The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFW 8 Fawns Meadow (1) IPM.Note FW: 8 Fawns Meadow FW: Colleen Bezanson Thomas Fenton, P.E. SMTP TFenton@nlja.com 8 Fawns Meadow SMTP cbezanson@montville-ct.org Received: from barracuda01.mail.websolutions.net [172.16.4.251] by mail.websolutions.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-9.22) id AE7B03D0; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:03:39 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1225821983-72ac00d20000-cZcApb X-Barracuda-URL: http://172.16.4.251:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from nlja.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by barracuda01.mail.websolutions.net (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9410F33D66E for <cbezanson@montville-ct.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:06:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from nlja.com (mail.nlja.com [75.60.47.230]) by barracuda01.mail.websolutions.net with ESMTP id JYlIuC1Z0hdIvIXm for <cbezanson@montville-ct.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:06:23 -0500 (EST) Received:from pc2 ([192.168.1.2] helo=nlja.com) by nlja.com with esmtp (envelope-from <TFenton@nlja.com>) id 1KxQXq-0006tO-GI for cbezanson@montville-ct.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:22:26 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-ASG-Orig-Subj: FW: 8 Fawns Meadow Subject: FW: 8 Fawns Meadow MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C93EA8.3573D502" Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:07:33 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: <1EF9CF52D4FA954E8C7C05FAAA9468ED89BA4F@SBSERVER.nlja.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 8 Fawns Meadow thread-index: Ack6AvLOeR2sVUDsSxi5x+qm/wEnwABYHEIQANAYLXAAARmcEA== From: "Thomas Fenton, P.E." <TFenton@nlja.com> To: "Colleen Bezanson" <cbezanson@montville-ct.org> X-Envelope-From: TFenton@nlja.com X-Spam-Id: 20081104/1KxQXq-0006tO-GI-cbezanson@montville-ct.org:TFenton@nlja.com:192.168.1.1:8000 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail.nlja.com[75.60.47.230] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1225821984 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at mail.websolutions.net X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=EXTRA_MPART_TYPE, HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.9467 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.00 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Declude-RefID: X-Declude-Scan: Score [0] at 13:03:43 on 04 Nov 2008 X-Declude-Tests: None X-Seclude-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination X-RCPT-TO: <cbezanson@montville-ct.org> Status: X-UIDL: 485376589 X-IMail-ThreadID: 8e7b01f60000763e Thomas Fenton, P.E. SMTP TFenton@nlja.com Colleen Bezanson 8 Fawns Meadow 00000006cbezanson@montville-ct.orgmail.websolutions.net 00000006cbezanson@montville-ct.orgmail.websolutions.net From: Thomas Fenton, P.E. Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 1:07 PM To: Thomas Fenton, P.E. Subject: RE: 8 Fawns Meadow Colleen, I feel that $5,000 is a reasonable bond to ask for on this. I base this on assuming $2,000 for mitigation of buffer encroachment and allowing $3,000 for reseeding and provision of additional topsoil if needed. One other recommendation. I stopped out at the site after our meeting. There is some rill erosion evident in the backyard, particularly downgradient of the driveway and retaining wall. Since vegetation will not be permanently established before the winter, I would recommend that temporary erosion controls stay in place until that happens. This could include silt fence along with additional mulch. Tom Thomas H. Fenton, P.E. Associate Nathan L. Jacobson & Associates, Inc. 86 Main Street, P.O. Box 337 Chester CT 06412-0337 860-526-9591 tfenton@nlja.com From: Thomas Fenton, P.E. Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:04 AM To: 'Colleen Bezanson' Subject: RE: 8 Fawns Meadow Colleen, I did not take a copy of either of the design plans (CLA or Boundaries) or the As-built, so I am just going from memory and notes that I took from a meeting with Tom Sanders and Vern this past Tuesday and my site visit the week before. As I understand it an initial plan for the lot was done by CLA and then the there was a revised plan done by Boundaries. There was some discrepancies noted between the original plan and the revised plan and between what was actually constructed and both the original plan and revised plan. Here are the issues as I recall them: 1. The original plan had a different grading plan and had the footing drains tied into a drainage manhole rather than discharging overland. As actually constructed the footing drain discharge appears to extend into the 50 foot upland review zone. From a practical standpoint, I do not see a substantive impact from the discharge of the footing drain. I would be more concerned about the roof leaders discharging overland and causing potential erosion on the graded slope in the rear yard. 2. The submitted as-built did not show the location of the septic system. 3. Contours shown on the as-built would seem to indicate that lot grading may have extended into the upland review zone which was not shown on the original plan. 4. As I recall, the as-built indicated that building floor elevations were lower than on the original or revised plans. Grading on the original plan indicated that there was a swale from the front yard around the house. It should be confirmed that final grading will be such that runoff will be directed away from the front of the house. 5. There is a stone retaining wall just past the end of the driveway, which I do not believe was show on either of the design drawings. Although the wall is not very high, Vern questioned if the wall should be considered surcharged by live vehicle loads because it is so close to the driveway. This should be addressed by the Applicant’s Engineer. Also, with wall so close to a driveway with a significant grade, I questioned if some type of guard rail or protection should be provided at the top of the wall at the end of the driveway. I would be available to meet next Tuesday. At this point I am scheduled to meet with Marcia and Don in the afternoon to review proposed road regulation changes. Tom Thomas H. Fenton, P.E. Associate Nathan L. Jacobson & Associates, Inc. 86 Main Street, P.O. Box 337 Chester CT 06412-0337 860-526-9591 tfenton@nlja.com From: Colleen Bezanson [mailto:CBezanson@montville-ct.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 4:14 PM To: Thomas Fenton, P.E. Cc: Thomas E. Sanders; Vern D. Vesey Subject: 8 Fawns Meadow Gentlemen: Is there a way we can get a list and/or meet with Atty. Heller and the engineer for 8 Fawns Meadow to go over the issues of the site? Maybe next Tuesday????? Colleen Bezanson Planner II Town of Montville Planning Department 310 Norwich New London Tpke Uncasville, CT. 06382 (860) 848-8549 Ext 379 Fax (860) 848-2354 <1EF9CF52D4FA954E8C7C05FAAA9468ED89BA4F@SBSERVER.nlja.local> Colleen Bezanson urn:content-classes:message mail.websolutions.net 00000006cbezanson@montville-ct.org multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C93EA8.3573D502"; charset="us-ascii" None UNITED STATES->destination mail.nlja.com[75.60.47.230] Score [0] at 13:03:43 on 04 Nov 2008 1225821984 by Barracuda Spam Firewall at mail.websolutions.net 1225821983-72ac00d20000-cZcApb http://172.16.4.251:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi 8e7b01f60000763e 485376589 Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 <cbezanson@montville-ct.org> FW: 8 Fawns Meadow TFenton@nlja.com 20081104/1KxQXq-0006tO-GI-cbezanson@montville-ct.org:TFenton@nlja.com:192.168.1.1:8000 Colleen Bezanson SMTP cbezanson@montville-ct.org