HomeMy WebLinkAbout90 extension request 32025From:Dean Fiske
To:Meredith Badalucca
Cc:jmm@mielelaw.com
Subject:FW: Mostowy v. Montville Planning and Zoning Commission appeal
Date:Thursday, March 20, 2025 12:01:42 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good morning Meredith. As you can see below, we were able
to settle the appeal on application PZ #24 SUB 2 that was
initiated and ran over February and March. Given that, we still
intend to comply with the conditions in the approval, but I
don’t think we will be able to accomplish all of those as well
filing the mylar within the 90 time frame in your approval
letter. I think it would be prudent to ask the commission for a
90 extension at you next meeting to ensure we can accomplish
all of the required conditions. Can you please confirm this
email and kindly let me know if there is anything further I need
to do in terms of proper notice. Thanks, Dean
From: jmm@mielelaw.com [mailto:jmm@mielelaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 4:23 PM
To: Fiske, Dean B. <dbfiske.ravenswood@att.net>
Subject: FW: Mostowy v. Montville Planning and Zoning Commission appeal
Also, FYI. James M. Miele
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRS NOTICE: No advice regarding a federal tax issue included in this communication, norin any attachment hereto, is intended or written to be used, nor can it be used, for the purpose
of avoiding penalties that may be imposed upon a taxpayer. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the designatedrecipient named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and, as
such, is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you hereby arenotified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in relianceupon the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received thiscommunication in error, please notify us immediately by reply and delete the original.Thank you.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jon Chase <jonbchasepllc@outlook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 4:11 PM
To: Meredith Badalucca <mbadalucca@montville-ct.org>
Cc: Leonard Bunnell Sr. <lbunnell@montville-ct.org>; 'mcarey@sswbgg.com'
<mcarey@sswbgg.com>; jmm@mielelaw.com
Subject: Mostowy v. Montville Planning and Zoning Commission appeal
Montville Planning and Zoning Commission c/o Meredith Badalucca, Assistant Planner,
Town of Montville
Dear Meredith,
Please be advised that the administrative appeal taken on February 12, 2025 by my clientsRaymond B. Mostowy Sr. and Shirley D. Mostowy from the January 28, 2025 decision of the
Montville Planning and Zoning Commission approving the resubdivision application knownas 24 SUB 4 and involving property situated at 958 Route 163 in Montville, for which the
superior court Return Date is March 25, 2025, will not be returned to the court, as a result ofsettlement discussions between my clients and the defendant-applicant, The Nevar Company.
Please acknowledge receipt of this email, and let me know if you have any questions.
-Jon B. Chase