HomeMy WebLinkAbout23SITE7-69 Fitch Hill Rd-TEComments 2 06162023
John U. Faulise, Jr., L.S. David C. McKay, P.E.
Gerald J. Stefon, L.S. (1952-2021) Jacob S. Faulise, E.I.T.
Boundaries LLC
179 Pachaug River Drive
P.O. Box 184
Griswold, CT 06351
T 860.376.2006 | F 860.376.5899
www.boundariesllc.net
June 16, 2023
Ms. Liz Burdick
Director, Land Use and Development Department
Town of Montville
310 Norwich-New London Turnpike
Uncasville, CT 06382
Re: 23SITE7 – A&B Excavation
69 Fitch Hill Rd & Leffingwell Rd
Montville, CT
Site Development Plan and Stormwater Management Report Review
Dear Ms. Burdick,
Per your request Boundaries, LLC. has completed a review of the site development plans and stormwater
management report for the proposed commercial development located at 69 Fitch Hill Road and
Leffingwell Road (Map 062, Lot 036-000) prepared by Green Site Design, LLC. A site walk was completed
with the Applicant’s representative and Town Staff on June 9, 2023, to review existing site conditions. The
project is located in the Light Industrial Zone and the proposed uses (office and warehousing/storage) are
permitted uses in the zone per Montville Zoning Regulations (ZR) Section 12.2.2 and 12.2.5. The project
includes activity within the upland review areas of delineated inland wetlands and is being reviewed by
the Inland Wetlands Commission under application 23IWC7. There are FEMA regulated Special Flood
Hazard Areas located on the property, however no activity is proposed within the 100-year flood plain
and only minor surface restoration/grading is proposed in the fringe of the 500-year flood plain.
The following documents were also received as part of the application package:
· Hydraulic Modeling/Analysis Letter Report for 69 Fitch Hill Road Development prepared by
Dewberry Engineers Inc. to Norwich Public Utilities indicating that there is adequate fire
protection for each building individually. The letter recommends coordination with the Fire
Department to determine if additional fire protection measures are required in the case that all
three buildings were on fire at the same time.
· Correspondence from the Montville WPCA indicating that an engineering study has been
previously prepared for development of the subject property with regards to sanitary flows.
Page 2
The following comments or question are based on review of the site plans dated May 25, 2023:
· Please add phase limit lines to the plans if any of the proposed infrastructure supporting future
Buildings 2 and 3 is intended to be constructed at a later date.
· Please provide the Uncas Health District approval letter for the proposed subsurface disposal
systems for the project file.
o Please review the elevations of the proposed septic tank and leaching field for Building 1,
there appears to be a typo.
o Please review the elevations of the proposed septic tank for Building 2, there appears to
be a typo.
o Please review the elevations of the proposed leaching field for Building 3, there appears
to be a typo.
o Please review the proposed grading in the areas of the leaching fields for Building 2 and
3. Based on contour interpolation it appears the bottom of the leaching fields may be
greater than 8 feet below grade at the southerly ends of the system (Section VIII.A. of the
CT DPH Technical Standards).
o Please verify that the subsurface sewage disposal systems comply with Appendix A of the
CT DPH Technical Standards for calculating the Flow Factor where multiple systems share
the same receiving soils.
· Per ZR Section 15.1.3 please provide a bond estimate for erosion controls and site restoration for
evaluation.
· The application indicates that OSTA approval is required for the proposed development, please
verify that the information is correct.
· Please verify that the approximate location of off-site structures within 100 feet of the subject
property lines are included on the site plans (ZR Section 17.4.8).
· Please confirm if any business signs are desired and add the locations to the site plan (ZR Section
17.4.13).
· Are preliminary architectural elevations warranted for the proposed addition to the existing
building given its visibility from the public right-of-way and proximity to residential properties (ZR
Section 17.4.18)?
· Is landscape screening between the abutting residentially zoned property (73 Fitch Hill Road) and
the proposed building addition and front parking area warranted given their proximity (ZR Section
17.6.5)? Please verify the property address indicated on the site plans. Also, the current property
owner appears to have changed since the date of the original survey.
· Please verify that the abutting residential property (73 Fitch Hill Road) is adequately
screened/protected from the proposed lighting for the building addition and parking area (ZR
Section 17.6.6 and ZR Section 18.16.2).
· Please verify that the proposed parking spaces provide the minimum required area of 180 square
feet (ZR Section 18.2.1).
· Please verify compliance with ZR Section 18.8.4 regarding the width of the proposed curb cut at
Fitch Hill Road.
· Please verify that a vehicle leaving the upper parking lot can complete a right turn onto Fitch Hill
Road as currently configured.
· The driveway serving 73 Fitch Hill Road appears to encroach onto the subject property and there
is a minor conflict between the proposed parking area and existing driveway limits. Is the existing
residential driveway proposed to be reconfigured to address the conflict?
Page 3
· Please provide additional spot elevations in the upper and lower parking areas at the existing
building and proposed addition to demonstrate that the ADA parking spaces do not exceed 2%
slopes. The line striping for the ADA aisle is missing from the lower parking space.
· Please provide additional spot elevations on the west side of Building 3 to demonstrate that the
ADA parking space does not exceed 2% slopes.
· Please verify the parking space count and line striping around Buildings 2 and 3. It appears that
some lines may be missing.
· Are bollards or another form of protection warranted between the parking spaces and proposed
Buildings 1, 2 and 3?
· Please add details for restoration of the public right-of-way for the proposed utility connections
and water main extension conforming to Town of Montville Road Standard and Improvement
Details (RS) Sections 140B.3 and 140B.4.
· Please provide a detail for the proposed driveway apron showing a 1-1/2-inch lip at the road edge
per RS Section 130B.2.
· Please confirm that the proposed driveway meets the minimum centerline radius of 75 feet per
RS Section 130B.6.
· Please demonstrate that the proposed driveway meets the sight distance requirements of RS
Section 130B.8.
· Is a stop sign/stop bar warranted at the exit to Fitch Hill Road?
· Is a guiderail or similar barrier warranted on the driveway above the 10 to 15-foot slope
descending into the site?
· Is a designated loading space warranted/necessary for the 1,916 square feet of warehouse space
remaining in the existing building?
· Is a designated dumpster space/enclosure warranted for the existing building?
· Please show the proposed utilities routes to service Buildings 1, 2 and 3. Will the existing
overhead service to the existing building be retained?
· Please show the location of proposed water services to Buildings 2 and 3.
· Please provide details for the minimum required separating distances between the proposed
water main/services and proposed building sewers.
· Is a blow-off or hydrant warranted at the dead end of the proposed 8-inch water main?
· Does the public sewer have adequate depth to provide gravity service to the proposed building
and addition? It appears that the building may have a walkout lower level accessed from the
lower parking area. Will plumbing be required in the lower level? Please provide details for the
proposed sewer lateral and grinder pump if required.
· Please provide details for protection of the proposed cleanouts from traffic within paved areas.
· Is a construction level drawing for the proposed water main extension in the public right-of-way
warranted? The drawing would demonstrate pavement restoration limits for excavations in the
public right-of-way as well as how to maintain required separating distances from existing catch
basins, drains, and other utilities in close proximity to the proposed water main.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.
Sincerely,
David C. McKay, P.E.