Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSC Exempt Modification Application - 557 Rte 82March 1, 2021 Melanie A. Bachman Executive Director Connecticut Siting Council 10 Franklin Square New Britain, CT 06051 RE: Notice of Exempt Modification for T-Mobile Crown Site ID# 876371; T-Mobile Site ID# CTNL815A 557 Route 82, Oakdale, CT 06370 Latitude: / Longitude: - Dear Ms. Bachman: T-Mobile currently maintains six (6) antennas at the 180-foot mount on the existing 180-foot MonopoleTower located at 557 Route 82 in Oakdale. The property is owned by Carolyn Besade and the Tower is owned by Crown Castle. T-Mobile now intends to replace six (6) existing antennas and add three (3) new antennas. This modification/proposal includes hardware that is both 4G(LTE) and 5G capable through remote software configuration and either or both services may be turned on or off at various times. Planned Modifications: Tower: Remove and Replace: (3)RFS – APXVTMI4-ALU-I20 Antennas (REMOVE) - (3) RFS – APX16DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 Antennas (REPLACE) (3)Commscope – NNVV-65B-R4 Antennas (REMOVE) – (3) RFS – APXVAALL24_43-U-NA20 Antennas (REPLACE) (6)Alcatel Lucent RRH2X50-800 Radios (REMOVE) – (3) Ericsson 4415 B66A Radios + (3) Ericsson –4449 B71+B85 Radios (REPLACE) (3)Nokia – FZHN Radios (REMOVE) – (3) Ericsson – 4424 B25 Radios (REPLACE) Install New: (3)AIR6449 B41 Antennas(4)1 5/8’’ hybrid cable Remove: (3)Alcatel Lucent – PCS 1900MHz 4X45W-65MHz Radio Melanie A. Bachman Page 2 Ground: Install New: (1) SSC 6160 cabinet (1) RBS 6601 (1) B160 battery cabinet (1) BB6648 (3) BB6630 (1) DUG20 (1) PSU 4813 voltage booster (1) CSR IXRe V2 The facility was approved by the Montville Planning & Zoning Commission on October 26, 1999 by way of Zoning Permit 99-276. Please accept this letter as notification pursuant to Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies §16-50j-73, for construction that constitutes an exempt modification pursuant to R.C.S.A. § 16-50j-72(b)(2). In accordance with R.C.S.A. § 16-50j-73, a copy of this letter is being sent to Ronald McDaniel, Mayor for the Town of Montville, Marcia Vlaun, Montville Director of Planning, and Carolyn Besade, the property owner. 1. The proposed modifications will not result in an increase in the height of the existing tower. 2. The proposed modifications will not require the extension of the site boundary. 3. The proposed modification will not increase noise levels at the facility by six decibels or more, or to levels that exceed state and local criteria. 4. The operation of the replacement antennas will not increase radio frequency emissions at the facility to a level at or above the Federal Communication Commission safety standard. 5. The proposed modifications will not cause a change or alteration in the physical or environmental characteristics of the site. 6. The existing structure and its foundation can support the proposed loading. For the foregoing reasons, T-Mobile respectfully submits that the proposed modifications to the above-reference telecommunications facility constitutes an exempt modification under R.C.S.A. § 16-50j-72(b)(2). Melanie A. Bachman Page 3 Sincerely, Richard Zajac Site Acquisition Specialist 4545 East River Road, Suite 320 West Henrietta, NY (585) 445-5896 Richard.zajac@crowncastle.com cc: Ronald McDaniel, Mayor (via email only to rmcdaniel@montville-ct.org) Town Hall, 2nd Floor 310 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 860.848.6778 Marcia Vlaun, Director of Planning (via email only to planningdept@montville-ct.org) Montville Town Hall 310 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 860.848.6779 Carolyn Besade (via email only to redmoebesade@yahoo.com) 70 Platt Road PO Box 788 Shelton, CT 06484 Exhibit C Construction Drawings Exhibit D Structural Analysis Report Date: February 11, 2021 Tower Engineering Professionals 326 Tryon Road Raleigh, NC 27603 (919) 661-6351 Subject: Structural Analysis Report Carrier Designation: Sprint PCS Co-Locate Site Number: CTNL815A Site Name: CTNL815A Crown Castle Designation: BU Number: 876371 Site Name: Walden / Carolyn Besade JDE Job Number: 628850 Work Order Number: 1919566 Order Number: 538781 Rev. 1 Engineering Firm Designation: TEP Project Number: 25624.496701 Site Data: 557 Rte. 82, Oakdale, New London County, CT 06370 Latitude 41° 30' 20.3'', Longitude -72° 11' 51.1'' 180 Foot - Monopole Tower Tower Engineering Professionals is pleased to submit this “Structural Analysis Report” to determine the structural integrity of the above-mentioned tower. The purpose of the analysis is to determine acceptability of the tower stress level. Based on our analysis we have determined the tower stress level for the structure and foundation, under the following load case, to be: LC5: Proposed Equipment Configuration Sufficient Capacity - 89.7% This analysis utilizes an ultimate 3-second gust wind speed of 135 mph as required by the 2018 Connecticut State Building Code and Appendix N. Applicable Standard references and design criteria are listed in Section 2 - Analysis Criteria. Structural analysis prepared by: Gautam Sopal, E.I. / JCR Respectfully submitted by: Shawn Hoffmeyer, P.E. February 11, 2021 180-ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis Report CCI BU No 876371 TEP Project Number 25624.496701, Order 538781, Revision 1 Page 2 tnxTower Report - version 8.0.7.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) INTRODUCTION 2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA Table 1 - Proposed Equipment Configuration Table 2 - Other Considered Equipment 3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 3 - Documents Provided 3.1) Analysis Method 3.2) Assumptions 4) ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 4 - Section Capacity (Summary) Table 5 - Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity 4.1) Recommendations 5) APPENDIX A tnxTower Output 6) APPENDIX B Base Level Drawing 7) APPENDIX C Additional Calculations February 11, 2021 180-ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis Report CCI BU No 876371 TEP Project Number 25624.496701, Order 538781, Revision 1 Page 3 tnxTower Report - version 8.0.7.5 1) INTRODUCTION This tower is a 180-ft monopole tower designed by Engineered Endeavors, Inc. The tower has been modified multiple times in the past to accommodate additional loading. 2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA TIA-222 Revision: TIA-222-H Risk Category: II Wind Speed: 135 mph Exposure Category: B Topographic Factor: 1.0 Ice Thickness: 1.5 in Wind Speed with Ice: 50 mph Service Wind Speed: 60 mph Table 1 - Proposed Equipment Configuration Mounting Level (ft) Center Line Elevation (ft) Number of Antennas Antenna Manufacturer Antenna Model Number of Feed Lines Feed Line Size (in) 180.0 180.0 3 Ericsson AIR6449 B41_T-MOBILE w/ Mount Pipe 4 1-5/8 3 RFS Celwave APX16DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 w/ Mount Pipe 3 RFS Celwave APXVAALL24_43-U- NA20_TMO w/ Mount Pipe 3 Ericsson RADIO 4415 B66A 3 Ericsson RADIO 4424 B25_TMO 3 Ericsson RADIO 4449 B71 B85A_T-MOBILE 2 Tower Mounts Miscellaneous [NA 507-1] 1 Tower Mounts Platform Mount [LP 712-1_KCKR] 75.0 76.0 1 GPS GPS_A 1 1/2 75.0 1 Tower Mounts Side Arm Mount [SO 701-1] February 11, 2021 180-ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis Report CCI BU No 876371 TEP Project Number 25624.496701, Order 538781, Revision 1 Page 4 tnxTower Report - version 8.0.7.5 Table 2 - Other Considered Equipment Mounting Level (ft) Center Line Elevation (ft) Number of Antennas Antenna Manufacturer Antenna Model Number of Feed Lines Feed Line Size (in) 165.0 169.0 2 Antel LPA-80080-6CF-EDIN w/ Mount Pipe 14 1 1-5/8 1/2 4 Antel LPA-80063/6CF w/ Mount Pipe 3 Amphenol QUAD656C0000X w/ Mount Pipe 6 Commscope HBXX-6516DS-A2M w/ Mount Pipe 6 RFS Celwave FD9R6004/2C-3L 3 Alcatel Lucent RRH2X60-700 2 RFS Celwave DB-T1-6Z-8AB-0Z 3 Alcatel Lucent RRH2X60-PCS 3 Alcatel Lucent B66A RRH4X45 167.0 1 GPS GPS_A 165.0 1 Tower Mounts Platform Mount [LP 712-1] 148.0 148.0 3 Ericsson RRUS 12 B2/RRUS A2 - - 1 Tower Mounts Pipe Mount [PM 601-3] 147.0 147.0 3 Powerwave Technologies 7770.00 w/ Mount Pipe 12 2 2 2 1-5/8 7/8 7/16 3/8 3 CCI Antennas HPA-65R-BUU-H8 w/ Mount Pipe 3 CCI Antennas DMP65R-BU8D w/ Mount Pipe 1 Raycap DC6-48-60-18-8C-EV 3 Ericsson RRUS 4449 B5/B12 1 Raycap DC6-48-60-18-8F 3 Powerwave Technologies LGP21401 1 Tower Mounts Platform Mount [LP 1201-1_KCKR-HR-1] 3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 3 - Documents Provided Document Reference Source Geotechnical Report 2053524 CCISites Tower Foundation Drawings 1615419 CCISites Tower Manufacturer Drawings 1615393 CCISites Tower Reinforcement Drawings 2254969 CCISites Post-Modification Inspection 2447495 CCISites Tower Reinforcement Drawings 3345718 CCISites Post-Modification Inspection 3868204 CCISites February 11, 2021 180-ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis Report CCI BU No 876371 TEP Project Number 25624.496701, Order 538781, Revision 1 Page 5 tnxTower Report - version 8.0.7.5 3.1) Analysis Method tnxTower (version 8.0.7.5), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create a three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for various loading cases. Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A. When applicable, Crown Castle has calculated and provided the effective area for panel antennas using approved methods following the intent of the TIA-222 Standard. tnxTower was used to determine the loads on the modified structure. Additional calculations were performed to determine the stresses in the pole and in the reinforcing elements. These calculations are presented in Appendix C. 3.2) Assumptions 1) The tower and structures were maintained in accordance with the TIA-222 Standard. 2) The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as specified in Tables 1 and 2, and the referenced drawings. This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. Tower Engineering Professionals should be notified to determine the effect on the structural integrity of the tower. 4) ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 4 - Section Capacity (Summary)1,2 Elevation (ft) Component Type Size Critical Element % Capacity Pass / Fail 180 - 175 Pole TP19.063x18x0.25 Pole 8.3% Pass 175 - 170 Pole TP20.126x19.063x0.25 Pole 15.1% Pass 170 - 165 Pole TP21.188x20.126x0.25 Pole 20.9% Pass 165 - 160 Pole TP22.251x21.188x0.25 Pole 36.6% Pass 160 - 155 Pole TP23.314x22.251x0.25 Pole 45.8% Pass 155 - 150 Pole TP24.377x23.314x0.25 Pole 53.7% Pass 150 - 145 Pole TP25.439x24.377x0.25 Pole 63.0% Pass 145 - 140 Pole TP26.502x25.439x0.25 Pole 73.2% Pass 140 - 137 Pole TP27.99x26.502x0.25 Pole 78.7% Pass 137 - 132 Pole TP27.69x26.64x0.3125 Pole 69.7% Pass 132 - 131.08 Pole TP27.882x27.69x0.3125 Pole 70.7% Pass 131.08 - 130.83 Pole + Reinf. TP27.935x27.882x0.475 Reinf. 4 Tension Rupture 64.0% Pass 130.83 - 125.83 Pole + Reinf. TP28.984x27.935x0.4625 Reinf. 4 Tension Rupture 69.2% Pass 125.83 - 120.83 Pole + Reinf. TP30.034x28.984x0.4563 Reinf. 4 Tension Rupture 73.9% Pass 120.83 - 115.83 Pole + Reinf. TP31.084x30.034x0.45 Reinf. 4 Tension Rupture 78.1% Pass 115.83 - 110.83 Pole + Reinf. TP32.134x31.084x0.45 Reinf. 4 Tension Rupture 81.8% Pass 110.83 - 105.83 Pole + Reinf. TP33.184x32.134x0.4375 Reinf. 4 Tension Rupture 85.1% Pass 105.83 - 104.57 Pole + Reinf. TP33.45x33.184x0.4375 Reinf. 4 Tension Rupture 85.9% Pass 104.57 - 104.23 Pole + Reinf. TP33.52x33.45x0.475 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 73.7% Pass 104.23 - 104.08 Pole + Reinf. TP33.551x33.52x0.475 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 73.8% Pass 104.08 - 99.08 Pole + Reinf. TP34.601x33.551x0.4625 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 76.3% Pass 99.08 - 94.08 Pole + Reinf. TP35.651x34.601x0.4625 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 78.7% Pass 94.08 - 92.59 Pole + Reinf. TP37.05x35.651x0.4625 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 79.3% Pass 92.59 - 86.42 Pole + Reinf. TP36.633x35.34x0.525 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 74.2% Pass 86.42 - 81.42 Pole + Reinf. TP37.681x36.633x0.5125 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 75.8% Pass 81.42 - 76.42 Pole + Reinf. TP38.729x37.681x0.5125 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 77.1% Pass February 11, 2021 180-ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis Report CCI BU No 876371 TEP Project Number 25624.496701, Order 538781, Revision 1 Page 6 tnxTower Report - version 8.0.7.5 Elevation (ft) Component Type Size Critical Element % Capacity Pass / Fail 76.42 - 71.42 Pole + Reinf. TP39.777x38.729x0.5125 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 78.3% Pass 71.42 - 69.32 Pole + Reinf. TP40.218x39.777x0.5063 Reinf. 3 Tension Rupture 78.8% Pass 69.32 - 69.07 Pole TP40.27x40.218x0.375 Pole 89.7% Pass 69.07 - 68.83 Pole TP40.319x40.27x0.375 Pole 89.7% Pass 68.83 - 68.58 Pole + Reinf. TP40.372x40.319x0.5375 Reinf. 2 Compression 71.5% Pass 68.58 - 63.58 Pole + Reinf. TP41.42x40.372x0.525 Reinf. 2 Compression 72.5% Pass 63.58 - 58.58 Pole + Reinf. TP42.468x41.42x0.525 Reinf. 2 Compression 73.5% Pass 58.58 - 53.58 Pole + Reinf. TP43.516x42.468x0.5188 Reinf. 2 Compression 74.3% Pass 53.58 - 49.13 Pole + Reinf. TP45.76x43.516x0.5125 Reinf. 2 Compression 74.9% Pass 49.13 - 41.88 Pole + Reinf. TP45.22x43.7x0.575 Reinf. 2 Compression 69.8% Pass 41.88 - 36.88 Pole + Reinf. TP46.268x45.22x0.575 Reinf. 2 Compression 70.2% Pass 36.88 - 34.92 Pole + Reinf. TP46.679x46.268x0.575 Reinf. 2 Compression 70.4% Pass 34.92 - 34.67 Pole TP46.732x46.679x0.4375 Pole 81.8% Pass 34.67 - 34.33 Pole TP46.802x46.732x0.4375 Pole 81.8% Pass 34.33 - 34.08 Pole + Reinf. TP46.855x46.802x0.55 Reinf. 1 Tension Rupture 77.0% Pass 34.08 - 29.08 Pole + Reinf. TP47.903x46.855x0.55 Reinf. 1 Tension Rupture 77.3% Pass 29.08 - 24.08 Pole + Reinf. TP48.951x47.903x0.5438 Reinf. 1 Tension Rupture 77.6% Pass 24.08 - 19.08 Pole + Reinf. TP50x48.951x0.5375 Reinf. 1 Tension Rupture 77.8% Pass 19.08 - 14.08 Pole + Reinf. TP51.048x50x0.5375 Reinf. 1 Tension Rupture 78.0% Pass 14.08 - 9.08 Pole + Reinf. TP52.096x51.048x0.5375 Reinf. 1 Tension Rupture 78.2% Pass 9.08 - 4.08 Pole + Reinf. TP53.145x52.096x0.5375 Reinf. 1 Tension Rupture 78.3% Pass 4.08 - 0 Pole + Reinf. TP54x53.145x0.5375 Reinf. 1 Tension Rupture 78.3% Pass Summary Pole 89.7% Pass Reinforcement 85.9% Pass Overall 89.7% Pass Table 5 - Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity - LC5 Notes Component Elevation (ft) % Capacity Pass / Fail 1,2 Anchor Rods - 63.6 Pass 1,2 Base Plate - 52.3 Pass 1,2,3 Base Foundation - Design Reaction Comparison - 68.4 Pass Structure Rating (max from all components) = 89.7% Notes: 1) See additional documentation in "Appendix C - Additional Calculations" for calculations supporting the % capacity listed. 2) Rating per TIA-222-H Section 15.5 3) Foundation capacity determined by comparing analysis reactions to rock anchor design reactions per the structural modification report by Paul J. Ford and Company dated October 04, 2012 (CCI Doc ID# 3345718). 4.1) Recommendations 1) The tower and its foundation have sufficient capacity to carry the proposed load configuration. No modifications are required at this time. Exhibit E Mount Analysis Subject: Carrier Designation: Sprint PCS Crown Castle Designation: Engineering Firm Designation: Site Data: Structure Information: February 3, 2021 10.7 ft Platform Mount Analysis CCI BU No 876371 Order 538781 Rev. 0 Page 2 February 3, 2021 10.7 ft Platform Mount Analysis CCI BU No 876371 Order 538781 Rev. 0 Page 3 February 3, 2021 10.7 ft Platform Mount Analysis CCI BU No 876371 Order 538781 Rev. 0 Page 4 Tower Mount Analysis February 3, 2021 10.7 ft Platform Mount Analysis CCI BU No 876371 Order 538781 Rev. 0 Page 5 Exhibit F Power Density/RF Emissions Report RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS ANALYSIS REPORT EVALUATION OF HUMAN EXPOSURE POTENTIAL TO NON-IONIZING EMISSIONS T-Mobile Existing Facility Site ID: CTNL815A 557 Rte. 82 Oakdale, Connecticut 06370 March 12, 2021 EBI Project Number: 6221001152 Site Compliance Summary Compliance Status: COMPLIANT Site total MPE% of FCC general population allowable limit: 12.52% March 12, 2021 T-Mobile Attn: Jason Overbey, RF Manager 35 Griffin Road South Bloomfield, Connecticut 06002 Emissions Analysis for Site: CTNL815A EBI Consulting was directed to analyze the proposed T-Mobile facility located at 557 Rte. 82 in Oakdale, Connecticut for the purpose of determining whether the emissions from the Proposed T-Mobile Antenna Installation located on this property are within specified federal limits. All information used in this report was analyzed as a percentage of current Maximum Permissible Exposure (% MPE) as listed in the FCC OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01and ANSI/IEEE Std C95.1. The FCC regulates Maximum Permissible Exposure in units of microwatts per square centimeter (µW/cm2). The number of µW/cm2 calculated at each sample point is called the power density. The exposure limit for power density varies depending upon the frequencies being utilized. Wireless Carriers and Paging Services use different frequency bands each with different exposure limits; therefore, it is necessary to report results and limits in terms of percent MPE rather than power density. All results were compared to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) radio frequency exposure rules, 47 CFR 1.1307(b)(1) – (b)(3), to determine compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for General Population/Uncontrolled environments as defined below. General population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general population may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general population would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area. Public exposure to radio frequencies is regulated and enforced in units of microwatts per square centimeter (W/cm2). The general population exposure limits for the 600 MHz and 700 MHz frequency bands are approximately 400 W/cm2 and 467 W/cm2, respectively. The general population exposure limit for the 1900 MHz (PCS), 2100 MHz (AWS) and 11 GHz frequency bands is 1000 W/cm2. Because each carrier will be using different frequency bands, and each frequency band has different exposure limits, it is necessary to report percent of MPE rather than power density. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. Additional details can be found in FCC OET 65. CALCULATIONS Calculations were done for the proposed T-Mobile Wireless antenna facility located at 557 Rte. 82 in Oakdale, Connecticut using the equipment information listed below. All calculations were performed per the specifications under FCC OET 65. Since T-Mobile is proposing highly focused directional panel antennas, which project most of the emitted energy out toward the horizon, all calculations were performed assuming a lobe representing the maximum gain of the antenna per the antenna manufacturer’s supplied specifications, minus 10 dB for directional panel antennas and 20 dB for highly focused parabolic microwave dishes, was focused at the base of the tower. For this report, the sample point is the top of a 6-foot person standing at the base of the tower. For power density calculations, the broadcast footprint of the AIR6449 antenna has been considered. Due to the beamforming nature of this antenna, the actual beam locations vary depending on demand and are narrow in nature. Using the broadcast footprint accounts for the potential location of beams at any given time. For all calculations, all equipment was calculated using the following assumptions: 2 LTE channels (600 MHz Band) were considered for each sector of the proposed installation. These Channels have a transmit power of 30 Watts per Channel. 1 NR channel (600 MHz Band) was considered for each sector of the proposed installation. This Channel has a transmit power of 80 Watts. 2 LTE channels (700 MHz Band) were considered for each sector of the proposed installation. These Channels have a transmit power of 30 Watts per Channel. 4 GSM channels (PCS Band - 1900 MHz) were considered for each sector of the proposed installation. These Channels have a transmit power of 30 Watts per Channel. 2 LTE channels (PCS Band - 1900 MHz) were considered for each sector of the proposed installation. These Channels have a transmit power of 60 Watts per Channel. 2 LTE channels (AWS Band – 2100 MHz) were considered for each sector of the proposed installation. These Channels have a transmit power of 60 Watts per Channel. 1 LTE channel (BRS Band - 2500 MHz) was considered for each sector of the proposed installation. This Channel has a transmit power of 120 Watts. 1 NR channel (BRS Band - 2500 MHz) was considered for each sector of the proposed installation. This Channel has a transmit power of 120 Watts. All radios at the proposed installation were considered to be running at full power and were uncombined in their RF transmissions paths per carrier prescribed configuration. Per FCC OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01 recommendations to achieve the maximum anticipated value at each sample point, all power levels emitting from the proposed antenna installation are increased by a factor of 2.56 to account for possible in-phase reflections from the surrounding environment. This is rarely the case, and if so, is never continuous. For the following calculations, the sample point was the top of a 6-foot person standing at the base of the tower. The maximum gain of the antenna per the antenna manufacturer’s supplied specifications, minus 10 dB for directional panel antennas and 20 dB for highly focused parabolic microwave dishes, was used in this direction. This value is a very conservative estimate as gain reductions for these particular antennas are typically much higher in this direction. The antennas used in this modeling are the RFS APX16DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 for the 2100 MHz channel(s), the RFS APXVAALL24_43-U-NA20 for the 600 MHz / 600 MHz / 700 MHz / 1900 MHz / 1900 MHz channel(s), the Ericsson AIR 6449 for the 2500 MHz / 2500 MHz channel(s) in Sector A, the RFS APX16DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 for the 2100 MHz channel(s), the RFS APXVAALL24_43-U-NA20 for the 600 MHz / 600 MHz / 700 MHz / 1900 MHz / 1900 MHz channel(s), the Ericsson AIR 6449 for the 2500 MHz / 2500 MHz channel(s) in Sector B, the RFS APX16DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 for the 2100 MHz channel(s), the RFS APXVAALL24_43-U-NA20 for the 600 MHz / 600 MHz / 700 MHz / 1900 MHz / 1900 MHz channel(s), the Ericsson AIR 6449 for the 2500 MHz / 2500 MHz channel(s) in Sector C. This is based on feedback from the carrier with regard to anticipated antenna selection. All Antenna gain values and associated transmit power levels are shown in the Site Inventory and Power Data table below. The maximum gain of the antenna per the antenna manufacturer’s supplied specifications, minus 10 dB for directional panel antennas and 20 dB for highly focused parabolic microwave dishes, was used for all calculations. This value is a very conservative estimate as gain reductions for these particular antennas are typically much higher in this direction. The antenna mounting height centerline of the proposed antennas is 180 feet above ground level (AGL). Emissions values for additional carriers were taken from the Connecticut Siting Council active database. Values in this database are provided by the individual carriers themselves. All calculations were done with respect to uncontrolled / general population threshold limits. T-Mobile Site Inventory and Power Data Sector: A Sector: B Sector: C Antenna #: 1 Antenna #: 1 Antenna #: 1 Make / Model: RFS APX16DWV- 16DWV-S-E-A20 Make / Model: RFS APX16DWV- 16DWV-S-E-A20 Make / Model: RFS APX16DWV- 16DWV-S-E-A20 Frequency Bands: 2100 MHz Frequency Bands: 2100 MHz Frequency Bands: 2100 MHz Gain: 15.9 dBd Gain: 15.9 dBd Gain: 15.9 dBd Height (AGL): 180 feet Height (AGL): 180 feet Height (AGL): 180 feet Channel Count: 2 Channel Count: 2 Channel Count: 2 Total TX Power (W): 120 Watts Total TX Power (W): 120 Watts Total TX Power (W): 120 Watts ERP (W): 4,668.54 ERP (W): 4,668.54 ERP (W): 4,668.54 Antenna A1 MPE %: 0.55% Antenna B1 MPE %:0.55% Antenna C1 MPE %:0.55% Antenna #: 2 Antenna #: 2 Antenna #: 2 Make / Model: RFS APXVAALL24_43-U- NA20 Make / Model: RFS APXVAALL24_43-U- NA20 Make / Model: RFS APXVAALL24_43-U- NA20 Frequency Bands: 600 MHz / 600 MHz / 700 MHz / 1900 MHz / 1900 MHz Frequency Bands: 600 MHz / 600 MHz / 700 MHz / 1900 MHz / 1900 MHz Frequency Bands: 600 MHz / 600 MHz / 700 MHz / 1900 MHz / 1900 MHz Gain: 12.95 dBd / 12.95 dBd / 13.65 dBd / 15.45 dBd / 15.45 dBd Gain: 12.95 dBd / 12.95 dBd / 13.65 dBd / 15.45 dBd / 15.45 dBd Gain: 12.95 dBd / 12.95 dBd / 13.65 dBd / 15.45 dBd / 15.45 dBd Height (AGL): 180 feet Height (AGL): 180 feet Height (AGL): 180 feet Channel Count: 11 Channel Count: 11 Channel Count: 11 Total TX Power (W): 440 Watts Total TX Power (W): 440 Watts Total TX Power (W): 440 Watts ERP (W): 12,569.87 ERP (W): 12,569.87 ERP (W): 12,569.87 Antenna A2 MPE %: 2.17% Antenna B2 MPE %:2.17% Antenna C2 MPE %:2.17% Antenna #: 3 Antenna #: 3 Antenna #: 3 Make / Model: Ericsson AIR 6449 Make / Model: Ericsson AIR 6449 Make / Model: Ericsson AIR 6449 Frequency Bands: 2500 MHz / 2500 MHz Frequency Bands: 2500 MHz / 2500 MHz Frequency Bands: 2500 MHz / 2500 MHz Gain: 17.3 dBd / 17.3 dBd Gain: 17.3 dBd / 17.3 dBd Gain: 17.3 dBd / 17.3 dBd Height (AGL): 180 feet Height (AGL): 180 feet Height (AGL): 180 feet Channel Count: 2 Channel Count: 2 Channel Count: 2 Total TX Power (W): 240 Watts Total TX Power (W): 240 Watts Total TX Power (W): 240 Watts ERP (W): 12,888.76 ERP (W): 12,888.76 ERP (W): 12,888.76 Antenna A3 MPE %: 1.53% Antenna B3 MPE %:1.53% Antenna C3 MPE %:1.53% Site Composite MPE % Carrier MPE % T-Mobile (Max at Sector A): 4.26% Verizon 2.5% Sprint 1.82% AT&T 3.94% Site Total MPE % : 12.52% T-Mobile MPE % Per Sector T-Mobile Sector A Total: 4.26% T-Mobile Sector B Total: 4.26% T-Mobile Sector C Total: 4.26% Site Total MPE % : 12.52% • NOTE: Totals may vary by approximately 0.01% due to summation of remainders in calculations. T-Mobile Maximum MPE Power Values (Sector A) T-Mobile Frequency Band / Technology (Sector A) # Channels Watts ERP (Per Channel) Height (feet) Total Power Density (µW/cm²) Frequency (MHz) Allowable MPE (µW/cm²) Calculated % MPE T-Mobile 2100 MHz LTE 2 2334.27 180.0 5.54 2100 MHz LTE 1000 0.55% T-Mobile 600 MHz LTE 2 591.73 180.0 1.41 600 MHz LTE 400 0.35% T-Mobile 600 MHz NR 1 1577.94 180.0 1.87 600 MHz NR 400 0.47% T-Mobile 700 MHz LTE 2 695.22 180.0 1.65 700 MHz LTE 467 0.35% T-Mobile 1900 MHz GSM 4 1052.26 180.0 5.00 1900 MHz GSM 1000 0.50% T-Mobile 1900 MHz LTE 2 2104.51 180.0 5.00 1900 MHz LTE 1000 0.50% T-Mobile 2500 MHz LTE 1 6444.38 180.0 7.65 2500 MHz LTE 1000 0.77% T-Mobile 2500 MHz NR 1 6444.38 180.0 7.65 2500 MHz NR 1000 0.77% Total: 4.26% Summary All calculations performed for this analysis yielded results that were within the allowable limits for general population exposure to RF Emissions. The anticipated maximum composite contributions from the T-Mobile facility as well as the site composite emissions value with regards to compliance with FCC’s allowable limits for general population exposure to RF Emissions are shown here: T-Mobile Sector Power Density Value (%) Sector A: 4.26% Sector B: 4.26% Sector C: 4.26% T-Mobile Maximum MPE % (Sector A): 4.26% Site Total: 12.52% Site Compliance Status: COMPLIANT The anticipated composite MPE value for this site assuming all carriers present is 12.52% of the allowable FCC established general population limit sampled at the ground level. This is based upon values listed in the Connecticut Siting Council database for existing carrier emissions. FCC guidelines state that if a site is found to be out of compliance (over allowable thresholds), that carriers over a 5% contribution to the composite value will require measures to bring the site into compliance. For this facility, the composite values calculated were well within the allowable 100% threshold standard per the federal government.