HomeMy WebLinkAboutSite PlanPROPOSED
A �G: ELATE
PROCESS \ G OPERAT 0\
LEGEND
o IRON PIN FOUND
Oa+ DRILL HOLE FOUND
0 U`TILI`TY POLE
---100--- ExiSTING CONTOURS
100 PROPOSED CONTOURS
INLAND WETLANDS FLAG
����■��� SILT FENCE
ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING
LEFFINGW ROAD & MOMMI ROAD
MONTA CONNECTICUT
PREPARW FOR:
AUK C
ding
TOWN
UNE
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
05/15/2007 ADDED NOTES do FENCING
r06/16/2007 REVISED PROCESSING LOCATION
9
TOWN
OF
NORWICH
co�L'
TOWN
OF
MONTVILu
V•
TOWN
UNE
"WOMIM 1/
,.I
PREPARED BY:
hic
Engineering • Surveying • Site Planning
INDEX -TO DRAWINGS
I�1E
COVER SHEET
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
SITE OPERATIONS PLAN
SIGHTUNE PLAN
DETAIL SHEET
SHEET
No.
1
OF
5
2
OF
5
3
OF
5
4
of
5
5
OF
5
This drawing is the intellectual property of
Provost and Rovero, Inc. Any alteration
or use of this drawing for other than the
specific purpose(s) shown hereon is
prohibited without the written permiAt
ssion
of Provost and Rovero, Inc
57 East Main Street, P.O. Box 191
Plainfield, Connecticut 06374
(860) 230-0856 - FAX: (860) 230-0860
.._.: {
EMAIL: info@prorovinc.com t v1�'L n
LC
AUG 19 2020
MAY 99 2007 By
.. . . .. Do�m DATE SHEET 1 OF 4
JOB NO: 073030
DWG N0: HF23
CURVE DATA
cl
R = 414.36'
D = 2704'04"
L m 349.60'
CH = N 13'32'02" E
339.32'
OF
( _ rA N D S
E T �'
W-94 TOWN
x-'296
UNE QATA 0 (Jt +! `\ APPROXIMATE LA11 S hP � � �--------; 300 OF
L 1 N 2X18"17* E 37.50' ! : OF 100 YEAR FLOOD 2� 41 " -- _ _ _ _ _ 302
�� i'CW
296 �' _� X04 NORWICH
12 S 65'! 1 *22* E 34.73 ;ii �' E T L A N D S tia °� 29s
L3 S 79 79 55 E 14.57 TOWN 0 F •� .� 1�
!� ��• \� :50 /+ \ -- -`- 304
NORWICH
0
n f m ;'� TOWN OFlli
r 1 MONTVILLE /---_`_ i //_����°� ,l
The Norwich Cemetery Association /
• / / / +
CENTERLINE OF BROOK IS ; J I j t1l
/ , / �P t; t ,,.. •
PROPERTY LINE &TOWN LINEglop*
% / ' �G �'" t +••
T R A D I N G /+
C 0 V E 0 4F d
259 I /+
0100 !4%b 10�_
.4; Nt,
INV - 289.19 - Z,'A'---`` -` -� • \ / % /
_ _
--ANN 40000
'--- ; - z �_ ,' / / /oo { � • ' i�
,.. `••� W + •:APPR004AATE UMTS
:. .- : 0 292 - s / / / ' 1 ••••r/ / "- ` OF 500 YE/1R FLOOD CJ
PROPOSEDCULIPRT ) # ' 6�y - ! • • • u ryes 4 9 6 — — \ �,�,,� �/ / (% + We e.r•- / „_,•.•�-i `�`'' ---"� .°Eo ��
REPAIR � � ,� --- 41- \ �0 \ .- -_- --- -- --- ,1;\ / / i 000-�LOCATI � 1�1AP
+ -' � _ _ `, -- — _._ ..`„ - • 1* s 1000'
• 0 / �ia - -" ' EXISTING ..
�► RIP RAP BERM � \ �' �- — — _ ._ — — TREE LINE
+ �` ,�
/' i GRAVEL + + + + i
ME
This drawing is the intellectual property of
/ - -- - _ -Rovero, Inc. Anyalteratt�on
- Provost and
ID
i
-- _ -- - - ' ( or use of this drawingfor other than the
�- ` f i '� ' i � - -"'�� -- ---------------------------T----- `'1 / + I
APPROXINATE
_-- i I ec�ficpurpose(s)shown hereon is
uMrrs of J __ _ ..}-- - _ - - r , - - _ + f :, , prohibited without the written permission
100 y
FLOOD � � � -+`' ----- � + +loll, ,..
--- -- - - - - of Provost and Rovero, Inc.
0+ I I
/
MW WAVEL
! / PILE r + ,- \ . _ -- • J 1
( RE SSE w WOOD PocsT + / \ J 1. This survey has been prepared pursuant to the Regulations of
r PILE ' ' -
�'-a X4•. PILE/ t ,,-' / , . i J ' Connecticut State Agencies Sections 20-300b-1 through 20-300b-20
GRAVEL
and the "Standards for Surveys and Maps in the State of Connecticut"
PILE
` (� I • I l N as adopted by the Connecticut Association of Land Surveyors, Inc.
�.�• +� f , / �. J / / - - - -" '�' \ i J ,�, on September 2fi, 1996;
302 . •. • .., �,: , 5f A� + ' ° •'
TOTAL EA 32 / �� ''�-� � I �' '
/ I ` 310 ' + ( I '� /� ,moo This map was prepared from record research, other maps, limited
field measurements and other sources,
'^`'' ? ' �� It is not to be construed
�0*� ,r� / �,� \ 1 i / ( ><�.;� ,
J , t A� \ \ __�t2 ,`+' /, / ! ; as a Property/Boundary or Limited Property/Boundary Survey and
l.� �� *,, �- / 1 3, 4,L _ ` - -.� 'J+- + is subject to such facts as sold surveys may disclose.
X04 .__. I J � � � ' � `\ \``! ' ! /\ �/� / �`` ,y�•-� \ i � � '_ �\� ` ` \,•� \ `` ' �� „ ,f
+ *,-' / `� This survey conforms to a Class C horizontal accuracy.
` ' \ APPROXIMATE UM1T5 + I \ ✓ `\ ,ti \ , j i �•
OF �o YEAR FLOOD
-._,, j �� 5, ; ` i ; 1 j JM - Topographic features conform to a Class "T-2 , "V-2 vertical
306 _.._ _ .-- I �-- - _ �o� oar --- ���- :�- ' / + / /� ; } 1,' j J •'"•• accuracy.
\ I t ASP}uLT = r �?� --' _� �' 11 ( n/f
PRE
t316, 4�?` ` ` l L .,, , + / / , , I 4 ,(� j� / / /,, 51.62#f - Survey Type: Topographic Survey.
a
1 t l +/ N'&--�-+, N 68'5759" w Gardner—Whale Cemetery
-..._. / / / \\ -� � ,� � 1 � 2. Own
_ _ �_ ` // //�/ \ \� \\ _ 1 t I + / + J,! r J I I I I I I N� o Owner of record. Seymour Adelman 38 Bozrah Street
sNEr \ I 1 , ExlsTl�G ; / — -_ - _ - -._ _ _ .� / / / / \ \ \ , \� \ + I r �' 1 J , (/ (I I I Bozrah, CT 06334
TREELNE-+ / / �� /, / 1\\ \ ` _ , \�\ \\ / / /------
1701 I I
310 --•.,_` \ � � r : + / / --' - '!- •'' _� _- -_ - ` \ \ ` r J I r ! 1� / / � '. \ \� � .�\ \\ \ \ \~\ � �.. / � � /'+� � � l J r�/1 /.� � I I (: (I I I � ( � I I �
b 3. Parcel is shown as Lot #16, on Assessors Tax Map #62.
-\ i \\ \\ \ �I( ` \1W�„;\ r •� ,oma ! -+�—' /`-``_• _ - - -- - --i - --- 3 3i- -ce;.-- -- �-- .1_._- : -__ =�_ _—_- -i��-\ � ,-�-3���_4 --... -+_'\-�'• _ _ -_ , �--Jil-�- . -' jJ t r / I/ / �► / /( /-/( )l/: `+\`�i
L23�6 L3!�
field survey.. Contour interval 21. 312 4. Elevations based on an assumed d
atum
i
Co
ntours taken from actuali I
+
� °,A-\� o3r4 + + 5. Wetlands shown were flagged in the f'eld by Joseph R. Theroux,330 Certified Soil Scientist, in March 2007. o ,o
%- \\ ��/ Zone AE (base flood elevation determined) and Flood Hazard Zone43t + 6. Land areas adjacent to Trading Cove Brook Ire within Flood Hazard
IN L,4
"X„ (areas of 500 year flood) as shown on FIRM Map #090099 Panel
316 `�- \ %��/ ��; / , - - + - /, --- - -_ - . •,'' �- _ - - - r - -- , , \''- ��.: ��� \ •.• { l 1 \ ` i w 0003C Effective Date: December 5 1995.
r� /�1•. \ • 7. Before an construction is to commence contact „CALL BEFORE YOU
J --- L �-� •.•/ , -f- \ \\ \ , 1 •••-•-•••••••••�' i DIG„ at 1-800-922-4455.
+ �\ \\\1 \ �
Zo .ei Y E U
' l' +\\ \\`�\ / I 1 i ! /� / �� MAP REFERENCE:
\ w
+ % ; e + \ \. ` \ �\ \\ \ ,+ I ,/ / ' �� n�t „PropPerty Survey -Property of -Seymour Adelman Prepared for
3'24-” 1 •� •••••-.-•••.�\,.,., • • \ + ��o \ \\ \ \ \ , r / / a; ago Kobyluck Sand & Gravel - Montville Road & Leffingwell Road P Montville
\ \ \ + �_ �Ee_ \ •.,. + + . + \ \� \ \\� 1+ j / / N ` owrz /nowlcZ Connecticut- Scale: 1 = 80 -Dated. 4/24/00 -Advanced Surveys .
326
� \ \ \ \ ; � .,, � �`•-� �- ` � - �,�� � �\ �••� / � �--_ • •••'•• / � �- \\ •� '; \ ,� i / to
_ \ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
, - f EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
POND
LX
332-�90
�- PREPARED FOR
3SNEr , 1 »c5T1NG -_ % 3361700 \ -+ T�rE EXIVINc
TREMME
\ -�- - p/I, / / ti • .
336 LVK LLC
��. � `I - �� f , I � 1 � i 4 \ \ _ ____ ------ _ -- / ��� � \ ._ — — _ -� .- � _ , ✓ -- . _ -- _ _+ / � /
3�a / N' / + �, ti ` S' , -•"i i � — i j� t -- _ -- �- — -- - '-'k` ` -- — %-7 — — — �% J"-'�' / G
350
53.02 y, - - _ - _ _ _3• --_3- ,.4 __� -- 84.68 ,
'S7 W + _ -- - -- �- 77.09 40 20 0 40 LEFFING�VELL ROAD & MONTVILLE ROAD
v _ -- C�- -
-_ �_4� r _ 3 - _- _1,'x'4 N 70' w �� N 74'12'18" W
/ _ 50 3g
N 21 L , . -43:15 _ , N 74.26 07 ���� J ____r WT GRAPW SCAE IN nXr MONTVILLE, CONNECTICUT
S5f ; F F 1 22 W W r
app _ � D•? 3gp / N � G w � \ N 69' � D
w -- L L -�••-- R A
Sr�ET \ 4/ INV - 336.24
1694
SIGN 346 -- \ W `'�� 169 34.00' ` REVISIONS
�" t - 348 N 73'27'53" W DATE DESCRIPTION
' 05/15/2007 ADDED NOTES & FENCING
\ ~ — J _- `Tno-
it THAI 06/06/2007 REVISED PRor'U NG LOCATION
APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
MONTVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Special Permit No:
Applicant:
Date Approved:
Chairman:
Date:
APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
MONTALLE INLAND WETLANDS COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN DATE
I HAVE REVIEWED THE FLAGGED INLAND WETLANDS
LOCATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND THEY APPEAR
TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY CORRECT.
Certified Soil Scientist • Date
11#W Ow UI LU T POI
S&T #1696
aEVAMN = 348.48
V \
ENGINEER DALE
TO MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THIS MAP IS SUBSTANTIALLY CORRECT
AS OTED HEREON,
Vill
DAVID J. HELD, L.S. LIC. NO. 24267 DATE
NO CERTIFICATION IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED UNLESS THIS MAP BEARS
THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE LAND SURVEYOR.
08/17/2007 SIGHT UNE
08/18/2015 E&S CONTROLS PER TOWN
DATE: 5/09/2007 DRAWN: AMR
SCALE: 1" = 40' DESGN: NET
SHEET: 2 OF 4 CHK BY: --
nWG Nn' HF?3 JOP Nm- 073030
Engineering • Surveying • Site Planning
57 East Main Street, P.O. Box 191
Plainfield, Connecticut 06374
(860) 230-0856 - FAX: (860) 230-0860
EMAIL: info@prorovinc•com
C! CURVE DATA
R ! 414.38'
D • 2704'04"
L 349.60'
CH = N 13.32'02" E
339.32'
UNE DATA
L1 N 23'1817" E 37.50'
L2 S 65'11'22" E 34.73'
L3 S 79.79'55" E 14.57'
T R
t '
SIV ! 2 ! INV 289.19
8' CMP {�
Jl
DIN G
71
TOWN OF
MONTVILLE f APPROXIMATE UMTS
OF 100 YEAR FLOOD
TOWN OF
WETLANDS
NORWICH
296
298
it s ! - �C&� 'pti )
The Norwich Cemetery Association �l , _ _ r - ' ;°
CENTERLINE OF BROOK IS •, / / *- / '
PROPERTY LINE & TOWN LINE / / ' ` / / Ile k P 0
C 0 V E e0l 00
00
OF
FLOOD
/
- '2„ / ,goo ( •,.,�' � ��.A'
W E T L �,....� �.� 2sz / t •'•
z9 0 g0 o C '�' '` / ' SED WOOD %
LANDS
2996
300
% y — ___- X042
306
1 _ 304
1
q/ lilt
--r
/
I
i f
CO
APPROXIMATE UNnS
OF 500 YEAR FLOOD
N
S
011111111111111111 1 ov HIP BERM •.r• �� ....--/
1sp 1p
4P 4 0 •
PROI 2 NEW �
,
PROVIDE NEW PAVFitiIENT '� POLES AND OVI�RHfAD \~''� " �P RAP sEl� r~ / +► / —
�- — __ — — - ► ; PROPOSED 4' MIN. -------
FROM SITE ENTIW4CE TO ''�_----� yo' WIRES FOR SITE U11UTE5 \ — 0/ �°� ®f 7REEL1 EN f 1►� � `� DIAMETER BOULDERS �
LIMIT OF PROPOSED
BRIDGE IU'AIR `o K PLE
PRDPOSED SWALE l N
Lill
• ••••••• •••••••••••••••• • l ` �'�,�i'•' •'•'•' ••••• • ••'•••'• • • • • •'�'� � '••••••••••••••••
p/
OFFSETDRN15 SIGHnJNE O o0°
Ile
1OTO PND/
!/7
"
/o
0o
.••./ . I % 1}: • ^ry�
et
O�'
' O
/r/p
REMOVIE./RELOCATE EXISTING
SOIL & STONESTOCKPILES , ! 00
• PROVIDE CRUSHED STONE
Q - -
ACCESS D AN?1-
TRACKING SURFACETOT& *51, AQ=
32
PROPOSED I 0'X20'
i � M
� --, ► _ --+_ ,,.,.""'--' / -''�"' __, % sCacF HousE/IracER If � � ,� / -,,, ,--________ _ , i1• � E� !
0!
RE i / PROPOSED 12 1X60' r / \
r ME
PILE TRUCK SCALE r • - ; i /
I
STONE
UMT OF PROPOSED MATERG4LS'PILE
►---'" PROPOSED PAVED PROCESSING AREA 6 r ( I crtwEL
PILE
ACCESS DRIVE
11.7 AICRES°% _ I '°� o� / , • I
Iry
302
1 f THA/ r , / ,�•.
•• i SPIKE 1W WOOD Posy 310
• / `. ELEVA77ON 304.79 ; ;
At
1 t.�.
3�s _ , A° �` CLEAR EXISTING VEGETATION 1 i / 3 '� _ _.
70 IMPROVE
?n i \ I j1 ` + ,�` •� + ��'�- �sl �LINE ArNE ' PROP0D �MATERAS
4 OF 4
`} ti
(SEE SHEETSTOCKPIUNG AREA
/VOLT l.7 `GAW
ti .
---..r
PtIE / 1 l J
'3 03,2 - 30,9•~
-- --' ` —i `� ` , 1 I ,� �l i•
I �' 't.;'L,'; if i 4 16 3 3J? --' .�\` — i \ fl 1 / / / / I l/ ! l / �- 1 ' n/f
7.� 310
t i �;'� ----� :�` _ ! 1 \ _ !!l ! �, ! i l ! ; __ _ ~'�, ...,,,4 fi , ���-- �� - _ _ \ 1111 I • I l !! ! (l 68.5r59, w - Gordinerholey Ce
metery
SNET + Exec _
_
10� ; ; / �� / / ���//f \�\\'� -- \ \\ \\ \ �/% j �� / SPOILS EA
. � ,� __ - _.__ _ ___ � l; I !Irk
tr �/� _ _---� _ \� ! r l \\ -\ \\ \\ \ \\/ fs !ll;,l I # I I I I I I I I !ISO
ro C4
312
Z"
314 �tW� ; I// // /l /l �-- _ \`�\\\�� ,\ �,` `` I \ \\\ \\ \ \\ _' _1� -_-�,4
I o� ,gyp,L2 L3
LA
T/
APPROXIMATE' LI/ //� o _ _ — _ — — / / .�•. _ -- \\ \\ ••..! ! i ��
goo i \' SOF 500 YEAR FLOOD / / '� — _ -- -- — -- ��� '�•• ••:•. �..,• �. ` \ \ \\ \ \ �'. f y l ! \ I ,. 1
X22 � � • \ �_—_ > > ____ �'� / \ � �\ \ 1 l ( f � �- �'�
24
1
\ \ ' `� �~. �\.`"qtr` `� ,�,. •••••••'••,, •• / \340 \ \ \ �� / j ► / '�
\ \ '` � :'`09
° \ •sem• _ \ / • •.,., \ \ I ; l / ai ..
\ \ \ \ �' `'a '' . ' ' ` y�0 -�� � �.''�• j �•-._. 1 • •'''... - / / C3 n1f
% \ \ \ \\ ,-' '� / ; / N C Linda J. Wowrzynow cz
3 \ \\ \ y 1 - \\\� — •••
330 N-1
w POND
SNET
1 goo334 ---___ �� o� - \ \ --- , / ,� � ,yc, •
\ \
WETLANDS
�--- r �o \ \ ' > 336
EXISTING \ / i i
c \ ,.f EXISTING J <_ , TREELNE
TREEUNE �' ` \ — �'� ; / / / ti •
36
3Q \ \ - %-�� 53.02 � -- -_ _ �� `----- - o ^ - �_-- 350
4•� --•.0 � o o , r --- .-- _. - .- - f-.'""` J .- ., 64.68 .- ---- ____ __ - _ -_
VJ
3 W. 'SO 3f--�8-- 1 �' N 7044t' W Q/ 09 40 20 0 40
N X21 38 / ' L E F _•,.�,,..,` . • �-_
-43.-W � � ry- � c�`'// N 74121 e w
-sT�P• o , F' N �a�..�.l.rl--�__!___N, 60!!17w wMEENNEW
�4 2s o! r , a4
/ SWT GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SIGN-- - -T `�-._. w w ,� N 8922 30 w , �--- 4
. ............................L L A D
STREET--_._. '' GR �S \ \
SK3N 346 INV - 338.24
SNEr 0 ° ` REVISIONS
348 ux
fir' 1895 34.00' DATE DESCRIPTION
N 73'27'53" w
APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
MONTVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Spedal Permit No:
applicant:
Date Approved:
Chairman:
Date:
APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
MONTVILLE INLAND WETLANDS COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN DATE
srW W anon ra
SW test
ELEMM - .He.4e
•
v .o
ENGNM DATE
TO MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THIS MAP IS SUBSTANTIALLY CORRECT
AS 1NRTED HEREON,
1 AVI.-4
DAVID J. H LD, LS. LIC. NO. 24267 DATE
NO CERTIFICATION IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED UNLESS THIS MAP BEARS
THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE LAND SURVEYOR.
05/15/2007 ADDED NOTES do FENCING
06/06/2007 REVISED PROCESSING LOCATION
08/17/2007 SIGHT UNE
08/18/2015 E&S CONTROLS PER TOWN
The professional engineer and surveyor
certifications provided hereon are
limited to revised erosion and
sedimentation controls to address
conditions associated with the 2015 Town
approval of this project.
NOTES:
1. This survey has beenprepared pursuant to the Regulations of
Connecticut State Agencies Section 20-300b-1 through 20-300b-20
and the "Standards for Surveys and Maps in the State of Connecticut"
as adopted by the Connecticut Association of Land Surveyors, Inc. on
September 26, 1996;
This plan was compiled from other maps, record research or other
sources of information. It Is not to be construed as having been
obtained as the result of a field survey and is subject to such
changes as an accurate field survey may disclose.
- This survey conforms to a Class "D" and "T -D" accuracy.
- Survey Type: Compilation Plan.
2. Property lines shown do not represent a property boundary opinion.
3. Parcel is shown as Lot #16 on Assessors Tax Map #62.
'4. Elevations based on and assumed datum. Contours taken from actual
field survey completed in 2007. Contour interval = 2'.
5. Wetlands shown were flagged in the field by Joseph R. Theroux,
Certified Soil Scientist, in March, 2007.
6. Land areas adjacent to Trading Cove Brook Ile within Flood Hazard
Zone "AE" (base flood elevation determined) and Flood Hazard Zone
"X" (areas of 500 year flood) as shown on FIRM Map #090099 Panel
0003C Effective Date: December 5, 1995.
7. Before and construction is to commence contact CALL BEFORE YOU
DIG at 1-800-922-4455.
8. Activities on this property do not propose any disturbance within
wetlands nor within the 50 upland review area. Any additional work
not depicted on these plans that involves disturbance in the wetlands
or upland review area will require a wetland permit.
MAP REFERENCE: -
"Property Survey - Property of - Seymour Adelman - Prepared for
Kobyluck Sand & Gravel - Montville Road & Leffingwell Road - Montville,
Connecticut - Scale: 1" = 80' - Dated: 4/24/00 - Advanced Surveys"
SITE OPERATIONS PLAN
PREPARED FOR
1VK LLC-
-LEFFINGWELL
ROAD & MONTVILLE ROAD
MONTVILLE, CONNECT_
Inee
Engineering • Surveying • Site Planning
57 East Main Street, P.O. Box 191
Plainfield, Connecticut 063 74
(860) 230-0856 - FAX: (860) 230-0860
EMAIL: info@prorovinc.com
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN:
REFERENCE IS MADE TO:
1. Connecticut Guidelines for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control 2002 (2002 Guidelines).
2. Soil Survey of New London County Connecticut, U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service 1983.
BOAS:
The proposed site is comprised mainly of four soil types;
Adrian and Palms "Aa", Agawam "AfA", Hinckley "HkC and Udorthenths "Ud"
Ao-Adrian and Palms mucks. This unit consists of nearly level, very poorly
drained organic solls in depressions and along streams of outwash plains and
glacial till uplands. The areas are mostly oval or long and narrow and range
from 5 to 40 acres. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent but are mostly less
than 1 percent.
AfA - Agawam fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This soil is nearly
level and well drained. It is on outwash plains and stream terraces. Areas of
this soil are irregular In shape or long and narrow and mostly range from 4 to 20 acres
HkC-Hinckley gravely sandy loom, 3 to 15 percent slopes. This is a gently sloping to sloping,
excessively drained soil on terraces of stream valleys and on glacial outwash plains. The areas of
this soil are oval or irregular in shape and range from 5 to 200 acres. Slopes are convex or
undulating and are are mostly less than 200 feet long.
Ud-Udorthents, smoothed. This unit consists of nearly level to sloping, excessively drained to
moderately well drained soils. The areas of this unit have been altered by excavating or filling. They
are mostly irregular in shape or are rectangular or long and narrow, and they generally range from 5
to 60 acres. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent.
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE:
1. Prior to any work on site, the limits of operations shall be clearly flogged in the field by a Land
Surveyor, licensed in the State of Connecticut. Once the limits are flagged, they shall be reviewed and
approved by an agent of the Town.
2. Install and maintain erosion and sedimentation control devices as shown on these plans. All erosion
control devices shall be Inspected by an agent of the Town. Any additional erosion control devices
required by the Town's Agent shall be installed and inspected prior to any construction on site. (See
silt fence installation notes.)
3. Install anti tracking surface and paved entrance.
4. Install scale and scale house in location depicted on the plan.
5. Transport required material sorting equipment to the site and place in dedicated processing orea(s).
6. Maintain erosion and sedimentation controls throughout operations.
7. Dust control wig be accomplished by spraying with water and if necessary, the application of calcium
chloride.
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN:
.1. Development of the site will be performed by the applicant, who will be responsible for the installation
and maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures required throughout operations.
2. Final stabilization of the site Is to follow the procedures outlined In "Permanent Vegetative Cover". If
necessary a temporary vegetative cover is to be provided until a permanent cover can be applied.
SiLT FENCE INSTALLATION__ AND
1. Dig a 6" deep trench on the uphill side of the barrier location.
2. Position the posts on the downhill side of the barrier and drive the posts 1.5 feet into the ground.
3. Lay the bottom 6" of the fabric in the trench to prevent undermining and backfill.
4. Inspect and repair barrier after heavy rainfall.
5. Inspections win be made at least once per week and within 24 hours of the end of a storm with a
rainfall amount of 0.5 inch or greater to determine maintenance needs.
6. Sediment deposits are to be removed when they reach a height of 1 foot behind the barrier or half
the height of the barrier and are to be deposited in an area which is not regulated by the inland
wetlands commission.
7. Replace or repair the fence within 24 hours of observed failure. Failure of the fence has occurred
when sediment fails to be retained by the fence because:
- the fence has been overtopped, undercut or bypassed by runoff water.
- the fence has been moved out of position (knocked over), or
- the geotextile has decomposed or been damaged.
HAY BALE .INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE
1. Bales shall be placed as shown on the plans with the ends of the bales tightly abutting each other.
2. Each bale shall be securely anchored with at least 2 stakes and gaps between bales shall be wedged
with straw to prevent water from passing between the bales.
3. Inspect bales at least once per week and within 24 hours of the end of a storm with a rainfall
amount of 0.5 inches or greater to determine maintenance needs.
4. Remove sediment behind the bales when It reaches half the height of the bale and deposit in an
area which is not regulated by the Inland Wetlands Commission.
5. Replace or repair the barrier within 24 hours of observed failure. Failure of the barrier has, occurred
when sediment fails to be retained by the barrier because:
- the barrier has been overtopped, undercut or bypassed by runoff water,
- the barrier has been moved out of position, or
- the hay bales have deteriorated or been damaged.
TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER:
SEED SELECTION
Grass species shall be appropriate for the season and site conditions. Appropriate species are outlined
in Figure TS -2 in the 2002 Guidelines.
TIMING CONSIDERATIONS
Seed with a temporary seed mixture within 7 days after the suspension of grading work in disturbed
areas where the suspension of work is expected to be more than 30 days but less than 1 year.
APPROVED BY THE MWN OF
MONT LLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Special Permit No:
Applicant:
Date Approved:
Chairman:
Date:
SEEDBED PREPARATION
Loosen the soil to a depth of 3-4 inches with a slightly roughened surface. N
the area has been recently loosened or disturbed, no further roughening is required.
Soni preparation can be accomp=lished by tracking with a bulldozer. disc Ing,
harrowing. raking or dragging with a section of chain link fence. Avoid excessive
compaction of the surface by equipment traveling back and forth over the surface.
If the slope is tracked, the cleat maks shag be perpendicular to the anticipated
direction of the flow of surface water.
if sod testing is not practical or feasible on small or variable sites, or where
timing is critical, fertilizer may be applied at the rate of 300 pounds per acre or
7.5 pounds per 1,000 square feet of 10-10-10 or equivalent. Additionally. lime
may be applied using rates given In Figure TS -1 in the 2002 Guidelines.
SEEDING
Apply seed uniformly by hand cyclone seeder, drill, eultipaeker type seeder or
hydroseeder at a minimum rate for the selected species. Increase seeding rates
by 107X when hydroseeding.
MULCFdNG
Temporary seedings made during optimum seeding dates shad be mulched
according to the recommendations In the 2002 Guidelines. Whenseeding outside
of the recommended dates, increase the application of mulch to provide 957x-10071;
coverage.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect seeded abs at least once a week and within 24 hours of the end of a
storm with a rainfall amount of 0.5 Inch or greater for seed and mulch movement
and rill erosion.
Where seed has moved or where sod erosion has occurred, determine the cause of
the failure. Repair eroded areas and Install additional controls If required to
prevent reoccurrence of erosion.
Continue inspections until the grasses aro ffly established. Grosses shoal not be
considered established until a ground cover Is achieved which its mature enough to
control sa erosion and to survive severe weather conditions (appmximatWy BOX
vegetative cover).
PERMANENT W&UAW COVER:
Refer to Permanent Seeding Measure In the 2002 Guidelines for specific applications
and details related to the Installation and maintenance of a permanent vegetative
cover. In general, the following sequence of operations shad apply:
1. Topsoll will be replaced once the excavation and grading has been completed.
Topsoll will be spread at a minimurn compacted depth of V.
2. Once the topsoil has been spread, all stones 2" or larger in any dimension will
be removed as well as debris.
3. Apply agricultural ground limestone at a rate of 2 tons per acre or 100 lbe..
per 1000 s.f. Apply 10-10-10 fertiliser or equivalent at a rote of 300 lbs. per
acro or 7.5 lbs. per 1000 e.f. Work lime and fertilizer Into the sod to a depth
of 4".
4. Inspect seedbed before sesalng. If traffic has compacted the soil, retill
compacted areas.
5. Apply the chosen grass seed mix. The recommended seeding dates aro: April 1
to June 15 do August 15 - October 1.
6. Following seeding, firm seedbed with a roller. Mulchimmedketelly owi
eeding. If a permanent vegetative stand cannot be September
30, apply a temporary cover on the topsoil such as nutting, mat or organic
mulch.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT„ CONTROL NARRATIVE=
PRINCIPLES OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
The primary function of erosion and sediment controls is to absorb
erosional energies and reduce runoff velocities that force the detachment
and transport of soil and/or encourage the deposition of eroded soil
particles before they reach any sensitive area.
KEEP LAND DISTURBANCE TO A MiNIMUM
The more land that is in vegetative cover, the more surface water will
infiltrate into the soil, thus minimizing stormwater runoff and potential
erosion. Keeping land disturbance to a minimum not only involves
minimizing the extent of exposure at any one time, but also the duration
of exposure. Phasing, sequencing and construction scheduling are
interrelated. Phasing divides a large project into distinct sections where
construction work over a specific area occurs over distinct periods of
time and each phase is not dependent upon a subsequent phase in
order to be functional. A sequence is the order in which construction
activities are to occur during any particular phase. A sequence should
be developed on the premise of "first things first" and "last things last"
with proper attention given to the inclusion of adequate erosion and
sediment control measures. A construction schedule is a sequence with
time lines applied to it and should address the potential overlap of
actions in a sequence which may be in conflict with each other.
- Limit areas of clearing and grading. Protect natural vegetation
from construction equipment with fencing, tree armoring, and
retaining woNs or tree wells.
- Route traffic patterns within the site to avoid existing or newly
planted vegetation.
- Phase construction so that areas which are actively being
developed at any one time are minimized and only that area
under construction is exposed. Clear only those areas
essential for construction.
- Sequence the construction of storm drainage systems so that they
are operational as soon as possible during construction.
Ensure all outlets are stable before outletting stornn drainage
flow into them.
- Schedule construction so that final grading and stabilization is
completed as soon as possible.
SLOW THE FLOW
Detachment and transport of eroded soil must be kept to a minimum by
absorbing and reducing the erosive energy of water. The erosive energy
of water increases as the volume and velocity of runoff increases. The
volume and velocity of runoff increases during development as a result
of reduced infiltration rates caused by the removal of existing vegetation,
removal of topsoil, compaction of soil and the construction of impervious
surf aces.
- Use diversions, stone dikes, silt fences and similar measures to
break flow lines and dissipate storm water energy.
- Avoid diverting one drainage system into another without calculating
the potential for downstream flooding or erosion.
KEEP CLEAN RUNOFF SEPARATED
Clean runoff should be kept separated from sediment laden water and
should not be directed over disturbed areas without additional controls.
Adftonally, prevent the mixing of clean off-site generated runoff with
sediment laden runoff generated on-site until after adequate filtration of
on-site waters has occurred.
- Segregate construction waters from clean water.
- Divert site runoff to keep it isolated from wetlands, watercourses
and drainage ways that flow through or near the development
until the sediment in that runoff is trapped or detained.
APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
MONTVILLE INLAND WETLANDS COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN DATE
REDUCE ON SiTE POTENTIAL INTERNALLY AND INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROLS
While it may seem less complicated to collect all waters to one point of
discharge for treatment and just install a perimeter control, it can be
more effective to apply internal controls to many small sub -drainage
basins within the site. By reducing sediment loading from within the
site, the chance of perimeter control failure and the potential off-site
damage that it can cause is reduced. It is generally more expensive to
correct off-site damage than it is to install proper internal controls.
Control erosion and sedimentation in the smallest drainage area
possible. It is easier to control erosion than to contend with
sediment after it has been carried downstream and deposited
In unwanted areas.
Direct runoff from small disturbed areas to adjoining undisturbed
vegetated areas to reduce the potential for concentrated flows
and increase settlement and fi=ltering of sediments.
Concentrated runoff from development should be safety conveyed
to stable outlets using rip rapped channels, waterways,
diversions. storm drains or similar measures.
SQUARE MESH CONSTRUCTION FENCING
With the vertical and horizontal strands, this product will install easier and stili withstand the most severe of
weather conditions.
Technical Data*
Model: Square Mesh
Color: Orange, Green, Black
Material: Polypropylene Copolymer
UV Resistance: One Year
Property
Unit
Value
Range
Method
Standard Height
cm (ft)
122 (4.0)
12%
ICE -05
Standard Lenghts
m (ft)
30.5 (100)/15.2 (50)
Standard
ICE -05
m (ft)
32 (105) /16 (52.5)
Max.
ICE -05
Weight per Roll
kg (ib)
12 (26) /6 (13)
Standard
ICE -05
kg (lb)
11.3 (24.9) / 5.6 (12-4)
Min.
ICE -05
Weight per
gr (lb)
390 /(0.86)
Standard
ICE -05
lineal Meter
gr (lb)
370 /(0.82)
Min.
ICE -05
Tensile Strenght
kgf (Ibf)
14/(30.8)
Min.
MPE-04
(MD Machine direction)
loor
Tensile Strenght
kgf (Ibf)
9/(19.8)
Min.
MPE-04
(TD Transversal direction)
Mesh Opening
mm (in)
35 x 35 /(1 A x1.4)
±5%
ICE -05
4' OF dor P Sive
AS DEFINED NV ''STATE OF CONNECTW
STANWO SPECFICAT>Onl3 FOR FIOWS�
8PdDGES AM 01COMAL CONSIRIJiC'IION'
FORM 816 OR LATEST REVISM
8' PROCESSED GRAVEL
SUBGR40E
GRAVEL DRIVE WITH,
DOT #3 STONE DETAIL
NOT TO SC4LE
(2)-2"x'STAKES
M BALE
a aILNS",n
D O a a
HAYBALE BARRIER
NOT TO SC4LE
1 14' im i i; i►JUIImillrxrs Mori -
1 1/2' CLAZ 1 BINDER COURSE
6' PROCESS GRAVU 84.SE -J
12' BAW-R!!!Y GRAVEL SUBBASE
320
310
k
»w
s+vo
SIGHTLINE SOUTH FROM ACCESS DRIVE
IN 4' WNWA
This drawing is the intellectual property of
Provost and Rovero, Inc. Any alteration
or use of this drawing for other than the
specific purpose(s) shown hereon is
prohibited without the written permission
of Provost and Bovero, Inc.
BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT
NOT 70 SC"
FILLER
FABRIC
� AMq.E 1P UP SLOPE
�T ]11
FUR STABHIIY AND
SQF (XFMMC
COiWACTO
M ` �xCV
84C*lu
SILT FENCE
NOT IV SUE
ENGINEER DATE
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
05/15/2007 ADDED NOTES do FENCING
06/06/2007 REVISED PROCESSING LOCATION
08/17/2007 SIGHT LINE
DATE: 5/09/2007 DRAWN: AMR
SCALE: AS NOTED DESIGN: NET
SHEET: 4 OF 4 CHK BY: --
DWr. Nn- HF?3 ,inti Nn: 073nzn
DETAIL SHEET
LVK LLC_
LEFFINGWELL ROAD & MONTVILLE ROAD
MONTVILLE, CONNECTICUT
Enginee=ring a Surveying * Site Planning
57 East Main. Street, P.O. Box 191
Plainfield, Connecticut 06374
(860) 230-0856 - FAX: (860) 230-0860
EMAIL: info@prorovinc.com
,k
loor
fXlSW GItA01E
100
� _ool �
FWMiFD (XLIDE
fIR
4q
40
»w
s+vo
SIGHTLINE SOUTH FROM ACCESS DRIVE
IN 4' WNWA
This drawing is the intellectual property of
Provost and Rovero, Inc. Any alteration
or use of this drawing for other than the
specific purpose(s) shown hereon is
prohibited without the written permission
of Provost and Bovero, Inc.
BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT
NOT 70 SC"
FILLER
FABRIC
� AMq.E 1P UP SLOPE
�T ]11
FUR STABHIIY AND
SQF (XFMMC
COiWACTO
M ` �xCV
84C*lu
SILT FENCE
NOT IV SUE
ENGINEER DATE
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
05/15/2007 ADDED NOTES do FENCING
06/06/2007 REVISED PROCESSING LOCATION
08/17/2007 SIGHT LINE
DATE: 5/09/2007 DRAWN: AMR
SCALE: AS NOTED DESIGN: NET
SHEET: 4 OF 4 CHK BY: --
DWr. Nn- HF?3 ,inti Nn: 073nzn
DETAIL SHEET
LVK LLC_
LEFFINGWELL ROAD & MONTVILLE ROAD
MONTVILLE, CONNECTICUT
Enginee=ring a Surveying * Site Planning
57 East Main. Street, P.O. Box 191
Plainfield, Connecticut 06374
(860) 230-0856 - FAX: (860) 230-0860
EMAIL: info@prorovinc.com