Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Oxoboxo Lofts - Addendum 2 with sheet A5-10 Door Schedule
ADDENDUM 2 Issue Date: February 25, 2019 Oxoboxo Lofts 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT General Information: 1. This Addendum shall become a part of the Contract and the Contractor shall be bound thereby. Changes to the Drawings and Specifications Following the Final Construction Documents dated 10/12/2018: Additional Information – Environmental and Hazmat Reports: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede Property dated February 2019 Hazardous Building Materials Assessment Faria Beede dated October 2016 Request for Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB) State Listed Species Review dated 1-14-2019 Application for Emergency or Temporary Authorization to Discharge to Groundwater to Remediate Pollution dated 2-19-2019 Draft Executive Scour Report dated 12-12-2018 Revised Drawings: Cover 01 Drawing Sheet List 02 Drawing Sheet List 03 Drawing Sheet List Civil Drawings C5.0 Utility Plan Architectural Drawings R.1 Code Data Sheet A5.10 Door Schedule AB-A4.1 Roof Details at AB Connector Mechanical Drawings ABC-MD1.SB Mechanical Ductwork Plans – Bldg B Level SB and Bldg C Level 1 DE-MP1.1 Mechanical Piping Plans – Bldgs D and E Levels 1 and 2 F-MD1.1 Mechanical Ductwork Plans – Bldg F Levels 1 and 2 HK-MD1.1 Mechanical Ductwork Plans – Bldgs H and K Level 1 M2.2 Mechanical Schedules Plumbing Drawings ABC-PB1.SB Plumbing Plans – Bldg B Level SB and Bldg C Level 1 ABC-PB1.B Plumbing Plans – Bldg B Level B and Bldg C Level 2 ABC-PB1.1 Plumbing Plans – Bldg A Level 1 and Bldg B Level 1 DE-PB1.1 Plumbing Plans – Bldgs D and E Levels 1 and 2 F-PB1.1 Plumbing Plans – Bldg F Level 1, 2 and Mezzanine G-PB1.1 Plumbing Plan – Bldg G Level 1 HK-PB1.1 Plumbing Plan – Bldgs H and K Level 1 J-PB1.1 Plumbing Plan – Bldg J Level 1 LM-PB1.1 Plumbing Plans – Bldgs L and M Level 1 PB2.1 Plumbing Schedules, Notes, Symbols and Details Electrical Drawings ABC-EP1.SB Electrical Power Plans – Bldg B Level SB and Bldg C Level 1 ABC-EP1.B Electrical Power Plans – Bldg B Level B and Bldg C Level 2 ABC-EP1.1 Electrical Power Plans – Bldgs A and B Level 1 ABC-EP1.2 Electrical Power Plan – Bldg B Level 2 ABC-EP1.3 Electrical Power Plans – Bldgs A Level 2and Bldg B Level 3 ABC-EP1.4 Electrical Power Plan – Bldg B Level 4 DE-EP1.1 Electrical Power Plans – Bldgs D and E Levels 1 and 2 F-EP1.1 Electrical Power Plans – Bldg F Levels 1, 2 and Mezzanine GH-EP1.1 Electrical Power Plans – Bldgs G and H Level 1 J-EP1.1 Electrical Power Plan – Bldg J Level 1 LM-EP1.1 Electrical Power Plans – Bldgs L and M Level 1 E2.1 Power Riser Diagram E2.2 Power Riser Diagram E3.2 Electrical Panelboard Schedules END OF ADDENDUM 2 Information contained in this document is proprietary and confidential and may not be disseminated to any party other than the intended recipient without the written consent of Paul B. Bailey Architect, LLC. Down to Earth LLC 122 Church Street Naugatuck, CT 06770 203-683-4155 ext. 3 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FARIA BEEDE PROPERTY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 FOR: Dakota Partners 1264 Main Street Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 BY: Down To Earth, LLC 122 Church Street Naugatuck, Connecticut 06770 February 2019 View of Site looking towards the West (Google Earth, 2018) Down to Earth LLC 122 Church Street Naugatuck, CT 06770 203-683-4155 ext. 3 February 8, 2019 Mr. Scott Shaw Vice President of Acquisitions & Development Dakota Partners 1264 Main Street Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 Via email: sshaw@dakotapartners.net Re: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut Dear Mr. Shaw: As requested, Down To Earth, LLC (DTE) has prepared this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the above-referenced property (Site). This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) was completed in general accordance with standards published by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM E1527-13) and the state’s Site Characterization Guidance Document (CTDEEP, 2010). Our objective was to obtain information on historic and previous Site uses, in accordance with prevailing standards, and to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions and Areas of Concern at the Site. In addition, we have provided our opinion as to whether the Site meets the definition of an “Establishment” under the Connecticut Property Transfer Act (Connecticut General Statute 22a-134). For the purposes of this assessment, Areas of Concern (AOCs) are considered the same as Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), as defined by ASTM. The Site is regulated by the RCRA Corrective Action remediation program and the Property Transfer Act. Seventeen AOCs/RECs have been identified relative to current or past storage of oils and hazardous materials, spills, and known environmental impacts to Site soil and groundwater. Remediation is in progress in at least six Areas of Concern and is currently being overseen by Faria Beede’s environmental consultant, Applied Environmental Interface of Middlefield, Connecticut. To date, remedial actions have included soil excavation and capping, soil vapor extraction, and upgrades to the existing groundwater pump and treat containment system. We understand that additional remedial actions are being considered by Dakota Partners to more fully comply with the state’s Remediation Standard Regulations. Future remedial actions will be coordinated with potential redevelopment of the Site. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page ii We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, DOWN TO EARTH, LLC Sarah Anderson Timothy Carr, LEP Environmental Scientist Senior Project Manager G:\MY DRIVE\FARIA\FARIA PHASE I\PHASE I ESA - 2019\PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FARIA BEEDE UNCASVILLE - DTE 2-8-2019.DOCX TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION....................................................................................... 2 2.1 REASON FOR PERFORMING PHASE I ESA .................................................................. 2 2.2 APPRAISAL EVALUATION .............................................................................................. 2 2.3 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE ........................................................................................... 2 2.4 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION ............... 2 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY USE LIMITATIONS ......................................... 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 3 3.1 SITE LOCATION............................................................................................................... 4 3.2 PRESENT OWNERSHIP AND USE ................................................................................. 4 3.3 SITE IMPROVEMENTS .................................................................................................... 4 3.4 ADJOINING PROPERTY USES ....................................................................................... 5 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................... 5 4.1 TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................ 5 4.2 SURFICIAL AND BEDROCK GEOLOGY ......................................................................... 6 4.3 HYDROGEOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 6 4.4 WETLANDS ...................................................................................................................... 7 4.5 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS ................................................................................................ 7 5.0 SUMMARY OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS ........................................................ 7 5.1 REGULATORY STATUS AND AREAS OF CONCERN (AOCS) ....................................... 7 5.2 STATUS OF REMEDIATION PLANS ................................................................................ 8 6.0 SITE HISTORY ..................................................................................................................... 8 6.1 OWNERSHIP RECORDS ................................................................................................. 9 6.2 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS .............................................................................. 9 6.3 CITY DIRECTORIES ........................................................................................................ 9 6.4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS ...............................................................................................10 6.5 HISTORICAL USGS MAPS .............................................................................................10 7.0 GOVERNMENT RECORDS REVIEW AND INQUIRY ........................................................ 10 7.1 MONTVILLE MUNICIPAL RECORDS ..............................................................................10 7.2 CTDEEP Records ............................................................................................................11 7.3 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES ...................................................13 8.0 APPLICABILITY OF CONNECTICUT’S PROPERTY TRANSFER ACT ............................ 13 9.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ................................................................................................. 14 9.1 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS ..........................................................................................14 9.2 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS ...........................................................................................14 9.3 ASBESTOS .....................................................................................................................14 9.4 LEAD-BASED PAINT .......................................................................................................14 9.5 RADON ............................................................................................................................15 9.5.1 Radon Map Results from EDR ...................................................................................15 9.5.2 Site Specific Radon Testing .......................................................................................15 9.6 PCB-CONTAINING EQUIPMENT AND BUILDING MATERIALS .....................................15 9.7 MOLD ..............................................................................................................................16 10.0 INTERVIEWS .................................................................................................................... 16 10.1 INTERVIEW WITH OWNER REPRESENTATIVE ..........................................................16 10.2 INTERVIEW WITH SITE MANAGER .............................................................................16 10.3 INTERVIEWS WITH OCCUPANTS ...............................................................................16 10.4 INTERVIEWS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ............................................16 10.5 INTERVIEWS WITH OTHERS .......................................................................................16 11.0 ADDITIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND DEVIATIONS ............................................................. 16 11.1 ADDITIONS ...................................................................................................................16 11.2 EXCEPTIONS AND DEVIATIONS .................................................................................16 12.0 DATA GAPS ..................................................................................................................... 17 13.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................... 17 14.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................... 17 15.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS .............................................. 18 16.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................. 19 FIGURES FIGURE 1 AREA PLAN FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN WITH AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN FIGURE 3 ENVIRONMENTAL MAPPING TABLES TABLE 1 PREVIOUS SITE TENANTS TABLE 2 SITE HISTORY TABLE 3 EDR MAPPED PROPERTIES AND DATABASE IDENTIFICATION APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 USER QUESTIONNAIRE APPENDIX 2 PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX 3 REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN (AEI, REVISED March 2018) APPENDIX 4 HISTORICAL RECORDS APPENDIX 5 STATE AND MUNICIPAL RECORDS APPENDIX 6 ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION Down To Earth, LLC (DTE) has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) of the Faria-Beede Instruments property at 42 Pink Row in Uncasville, Connecticut (Site). This ESA was prepared in conformance with the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice E 1527-13 for Phase I ESAs, which meets the requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI); Final Rule (40 CFR Part 312). The ESA was also conducted in general accordance with prevailing standards and practices, including the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP) Site Characterization Guidance Document (SCGD). This report was completed on behalf of the Dakota Partners (“Client”) by Sarah Anderson and Timothy Carr, LEP of Down To Earth who have the requisite training and experience to complete this project. Resumes are available on request. No Phase I ESA can eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs)1 or Areas of Concern (AOCs)2 in connection with a property. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with the Site, and this practice recognizes reasonable limits of time and cost. To the extent possible, this Phase I ESA presents a summary that qualitatively identifies potential environmental liabilities and provides DTE’s professional opinions relative to the identified RECs and AOCs so that informed business and regulatory decisions may be made regarding the Site. If the findings from this Phase I ESA indicate or reasonably imply that environmentally regulated materials are affecting the Site, then the need for additional testing to evaluate the scope, location, source, and nature of any release or threat of release is included as a recommendation. In contrast, the Phase I ESA may also conclude that the likelihood of environmental problems is not significant and that there is no evidence of RECs or AOCs in connection with the Site. The benefit of the completed Phase I ESA is that any new owner would be eligible for the bona fide prospective purchaser liability protection. The Connecticut Property Transfer Program requires the disclosure of environmental conditions when ownership of certain real properties and/or businesses known as “Establishments”3 are transferred. When an Establishment is transferred, an Environmental Condition Assessment Form (ECAF) and one of four Property Transfer Forms must be executed, and a copy of the form must be filed with the Department of Energy & Environmental Protection (CTDEEP). When transferring an Establishment where there has been a release of a hazardous waste or a hazardous substance, the party signing the Property Transfer Form certification agrees to investigate the parcel and remediate pollution caused by any release of a hazardous waste or 1 See Recognized Environmental Condition - the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, past release, or material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with the law Section 17 – References; Page 27. 2 See Areas of Concern - locations or areas at a site where hazardous waste and or hazardous substances (including petroleum products) have been or may have been used, stored, treated, handled, disposed, spilled, and/or released to the environment. 3 Establishment - means any real property at which or any business operation from which (A) on or after November 19, 1980, there was generated, except as the result of (i) remediation of polluted soil, groundwater or sediment, or (ii) the removal or abatement of building materials, more than one hundred kilograms of hazardous waste in any one month, (B) hazardous waste generated at a different location was recycled, reclaimed, reused, stored, handled, treated, transported or disposed of, (C) the process of dry cleaning was conducted on or after May 1, 1967, (D) furniture stripping was conducted on or after May 1, 1967, or (E) a vehicle body repair facility was located on or after May 1, 1967. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 2 hazardous substance from the Establishment. This Phase I ESA is intended to provide information to assist in the determination of whether a subject property and/or business meet the definition of an Establishment. 2.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION In accordance with ASTM E 1527-13, the user(s) of this report was interviewed concerning their responsibilities under ASTM E 1527-13 Chapter 6. For the purpose of this ESA the “user” is defined as Dakota Partners. Mr. Scott Shaw of Dakota Partners was interviewed and following subsections summarize the information that the user provided to demonstrate that they met their responsibilities under ASTM E 1527-13. The User Questionnaire is attached in Appendix 1. 2.1 REASON FOR PERFORMING PHASE I ESA It is our understanding that this Phase I ESA is being performed to support the potential purchase and subsequent development of the Site by Dakota Partners. 2.2 APPRAISAL EVALUATION Completing an appraisal of the property was not within the scope of this Phase I ESA nor was one provided for review. 2.3 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE The User is relying on the findings of this Phase I ESA to assist in determining environmental liabilities associated with the Site. 2.4 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION The User provided DTE with multiple previous reports and information related to their plans for development. These are summarized below. Full chain-of-title records were not provided or within the scope of this Phase I ESA. However, it is DTE’s opinion that an adequate history of the Site was obtained from other historical sources. As such, the lack of title records was not determined to represent a significant data gap. 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY USE LIMITATIONS A third party, such as a state or federal governmental agency, may place environmental liens on a property in order to recover clean-up costs that were incurred by the party. The existence of a recorded environmental clean-up lien on a property is an indication that environmental conditions either currently exist or previously existed on a property. Activity or land use restrictions for a property may be placed on the property deed to prevent exposure to hazardous or contaminated materials. The existence of an environmental clean-up lien or activity/land use restrictions could be considered an indicator of potential environmental concerns and could be a basis for additional environmental investigations on a property to determine the potential existence of ongoing or continued releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 3 DTE did not identify existing environmental liens or activity use limitations as a part of the research conducted for this Phase I ESA. 2.7 USER OBLIGATIONS As required by ASTM E 1527-13, the User of this Phase I ESA completed a questionnaire to summarize any special knowledge or experience with respect to the Site. The completed User Questionnaire is included in Appendix 1. The user responsibilities, as applicable, are as follows: Identifying the scope of work; Deciding whether to use prior assessments; Checking title records for environmental liens and activity and use restrictions; Disclosing specialized knowledge and experience; Explaining why the purchase price is below market value, if it is discounted; Answering interview questions in good faith; and Providing information as outlined in Section 6 of ASTM E 1527-13, including completing the User Questionnaire. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject Site is an approximately 10.6-acre industrial property located in Uncasville, Connecticut. The property is occupied by eleven mill buildings, many of which are interconnected and several of which span Oxoboxo Brook, a water body that runs from west to east through the mill complex. The Site is in a mixed industrial, commercial, and residential area. An Area Plan is provided as Figure 1 and a Site Plan as Figure 2. The property includes approximately 100,000 square-feet of manufacturing, warehouse, and distribution space. The facility was initially constructed as a woolen mill in the 19th century with construction of buildings over time prior to Faria’s purchase of the property in 1964. Since 1964, the buildings have been used for the manufacture of analog and digital engine monitoring instruments used in a variety of marine, military, construction, and related equipment. The property has ten mostly interconnected buildings which are designated: M-4/4A, M-5, M-6, M-7, M-8, M-10/10A, M-11, M-12, M-13 and M-14 on Figure 2. Most of the buildings are one- to two-story brick structures. Several of the buildings have basements. Building M-4/4A has a total of six stories with two basement levels. Four of the buildings form a central courtyard. Faria conducts a wide range of manufacturing operations on-site including: printed circuit board design and manufacturing, plastic injection and blow molding, metal machining (turning, milling, grinding and punch press), painting, polishing, electrical assembly, warehousing, and shipping. The buildings have a combined total of approximately 100,000 square feet of floor space. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 4 The portions of the property that are not occupied by buildings consist of paved and unpaved employee parking areas, loading and unloading areas, and an area of recently imported fill. The approximately one-half acre area of imported fill forms a plateau approximately 8 feet above the surrounding grade in the southeast corner of the Site. The importation of the approximately 7,000 cubic yards of soil to the Site was approved by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP). Faria Beede maintains a groundwater pump-and-treat system which recovers solvent- contaminated groundwater from six extraction wells located within AOC-6, east of Building M-13. The collected groundwater is pretreated for elevated CVOCs through a tray aerator and carbon system prior to discharge to Oxoboxo Brook. The extracted water is also used for non-contact cooling water in molding machines prior to discharge under a NPDES permit issued by the CTDEEP. 3.1 SITE LOCATION The Site latitude and longitude coordinates are 41° 26’ 11.45” North and -72° 6’ 26.67” West. Figure 1 shows the general location of the Site in Uncasville, Connecticut. The Site is located in a mixed industrial, commercial, and residential area. An Area Plan is provided as Figure 1. Abutting land uses are shown on Figure 2. 3.2 PRESENT OWNERSHIP AND USE The Site is currently owned by Faria-Beede Instruments Inc. Faria uses the property for the manufacture of instruments and gauges. 3.3 SITE IMPROVEMENTS Site improvements are indicated on the Site Plan provided as Figure 2. Structures The property has ten mostly interconnected buildings which are designated: M-4/4A, M-5, M-6, M-7, M-8, M-10/10A, M-11, M-12, M-13 and M-14 on Figure 2. Buildings M-1, M-3, and M-9 have been demolished. Most of the buildings are one to two story and area constructed of brick. Several of the buildings have basements. Building M-4/4A has a total of six stories with two basement levels. Four of the buildings form one central courtyard. Roads Pink Row is located east of the Site. Depot Road is situated immediately adjacent to the south of the Site. The Norwich-New London Turnpike (Route 32) is located west of the Site. Heating/Cooling Source Buildings north of Oxoboxo Brook are heated by a central natural gas-fired low pressure steam boiler located in Building M-6. Buildings on the south side of the Oxoboxo Brook have individual gas-fired space heaters. No underground storage tanks are known to remain on the property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 5 Waste Water Disposal Sanitary wastewaters are discharged to the Montville Water Treatment Plant. Faria Beede maintains a remediation system which pumps groundwater from an area of chlorinated solvent contamination located east of Building M-13. The groundwater is treated through a tray aerator and carbon system prior to discharge to Oxoboxo Brook. The discharge is covered by a permit issued by the CTDEEP. Water Supply The Site is serviced by municipal water and sewer services. There are two water supply wells located on the property. One active well is located west of Building M-13 and is used for production cooling water. Other Utilities The Site is provided with natural gas and electric utilities. It is believed that electrical transformers are owned by Eversource. 3.4 ADJOINING PROPERTY USES Properties adjoining the subject Site are zoned for residential and commercial purposes. Figure 2 shows the land use with respect to surrounding properties. Field observations confirmed that the surrounding land use consists primarily of commercial properties including: To the north by residential properties; To the east by Pink Row and residential properties; To the south by Depot Road, commercial properties including Pennell’s Auto, and private residences; and, To the west by Route 32 and Oxoboxo Dam. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Information related to the environmental setting of the Site and vicinity was obtained from the Connecticut Environmental Conditions On-line website which is maintained by the University of Connecticut: http://ctecoapp1.uconn.edu/advancedviewer/). Figure 3 was developed using portions of the information obtained, as summarized below. 4.1 TOPOGRAPHY The Site and regional topography are shown on Figure 1. The Site is located in a valley formed by Oxoboxo Brook, which roughly bisects the Site and flows from west to east. The total topographic relief goes from Elv 74 in the southwest portion of the Site to approximately Elv 16 in the east-central portion of the Site. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 6 4.2 SURFICIAL AND BEDROCK GEOLOGY Surficial soils in the vicinity of the Site are comprised of glacial sand, silt, and gravel. Surficial geology consists of outwash and alluvium deposited by Oxoboxo Brook and to some degree by the Thames River. Construction of buildings, septic systems, and utilities are presumed to have disrupted natural deposition in the Subject Area. Deeper glacial deposits (glacial till) form a thin veneer over bedrock, particularly north of Oxoboxo Brook. Overburden deposits thicken to the east, with an increase in the depth of bedrock toward the Thames River. The depth to bedrock on the Site is approximately 60 feet below grade. Toward the Thames River, the depth to bedrock reaches 125 feet below ground surface (bgs) or more. Based on information collected during historical drilling efforts, the Site is underlain by two types of bedrock, a muscovite, biotite schist and a pink granite. The Bedrock Geological Map of Connecticut (Rogers, 1985) identifies the Potter Hill Granite Gneiss; the Hope Valley Alaskite Gneiss; and the Plainfield Formation quartzite in the vicinity of the Site. 4.3 HYDROGEOLOGY Site groundwater was reclassified by the CTDEEP in 2016/2017 from Class GA to GB. GB groundwater is defined as being located within a historically highly-urbanized area or an area of intense industrial activity and where public water supply service is available. Such groundwater may not be suitable for human consumption without treatment due to waste discharges, spills, or leaks of chemicals or land use impacts. Oxoboxo Brook is identified as a Class B surface water. Class B surface waters are designated for: habitat for fish and other aquatic life and wildlife; recreation; navigation; and industrial and agricultural water supply1. Picker Pond is located immediately west of the Site across Route 32, formed by a dam on Oxoboxo Brook upstream from the Site. The dam historically supplied hydroelectric power to the textile mill operations dating from the mid-1800s. Remnants of various hydropower head races and tail races remain on-Site. Currently, the Oxoboxo Brook channel passes through the central portion of the Site, is culverted below Pink Row on the eastern Site boundary, and drains into Gairs Pond located approximately 500 feet to the east. Gair’s Pond discharges to the Thames River, located 2,300 feet to the east of the Site. The eastern portion of Gairs Pond is mapped by the CTDEEP to be tidally influenced. Groundwater flow in the shallow overburden is towards Oxoboxo Brook from the north of the Brook and on the western portion of the Faria-Beede property, and towards the extraction wells (influenced by pumping) in the eastern portion of the Faria property. The shallow water table is affected by the stream and low-lying wetlands associated with Gairs Pond, where the flow regime is expected to be largely controlled by the presence of Oxoboxo Brook and Gairs Pond. Groundwater flow in the deeper overburden has been shown to be generally towards the extraction wells in the southern portion of the Site, which are screened from the bottom of the silt unit to the top of bedrock. The capture zone of the groundwater extraction system has been shown to extend from near Oxoboxo Brook south beyond the MW-4 cluster and appears to extend across Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 7 Pink Row. The overburden aquifer north of Oxoboxo Brook is much shallower than south of the brook and therefore is not bisected by the silt unit. As a result, the expected influence of pumping is unlikely to extends north of Oxoboxo Brook. Groundwater potentiometric surface data from the monitoring wells clusters at MW-3, MW-4, MW- 9, MW-10, MW-202, MW-204, and MW-205 indicates an overall trend of downward hydraulic gradients, with groundwater tending to flow from the shallow overburden aquifer to the deeper aquifer. 4.4 WETLANDS Wetlands associated with Oxoboxo Brook have been identified in the southwestern portion of the Site and along the stream channel itself. 4.5 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS The CT-ECO database indicates that the Site is in a Natural Diversity Database (NDDB) area. The NDDB area is indicated along the Oxoboxo Brook drainage channel through the Ste. This indicates that threatened or endangered species have been identified in the area. The mapping does not identify the specific species involved. 5.0 SUMMARY OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS In 1964, Thomas G. Faria Corporation purchased the property and has manufactured gauges for many types of motor-powered vehicles since that time. Faria used chlorinated organic solvents, including tetrachloroethene, for degreasing metal parts until 1987. Faria also performed electroplating of metal parts from 1973 to 1981. The company utilized four state permitted impoundments for drying metal hydroxide sludges generated from treating plating wastewaters. The surface impoundments were located in the southeastern portion of the Site (see Figure 2). Numerous environmental studies have been completed for the Site. A partial listing of prior environmental reports is referenced in Table 1. Electronic copies of prior reports are available on request. 5.1 REGULATORY STATUS AND AREAS OF CONCERN (AOCS) Due to releases of hazardous materials and impacts to soil and groundwater, the Faria Beede property is subject to several environmental regulatory programs including RCRA Corrective Action and the Connecticut Property Transfer Act. Seventeen Areas of Concern/Recognized Environmental Conditions have been identified by consultants that have previously evaluated the Site. The locations are shown on Figure 2. Table 2 summarize each AOC’s status with respect to whether or not investigation has been completed or remediation is required, per AECOM. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 8 5.2 STATUS OF REMEDIATION PLANS A Remedial Action Plan (RAP) which was prepared by Applied Environmental Interface of Middlefield, Connecticut (revised through March 22, 2018) was reviewed and is included in Appendix 3. Of the seventeen AOCs identified at the Site, the RAP has identified six areas (designated Area 1 through Area 6 on Figure 2) as requiring remediation. Each Area may include multiple AOCs. The seventeen AOCs and six Areas requiring remediation are identified on Figure 2. The RAP proposes completion of the following remedial actions: The excavation and off-site disposal of contaminated soils which contain elevated concentrations of metals and/or polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons above remedial standards. Much of this work has been completed in Areas 1, 2 and 3. On-site capping and the placement of Environmental Land Use Restrictions to render some soils environmentally inaccessible, as defined by the state Remediation Standard Regulations. Much of this work has been completed in Areas 1, 2 and 3. Soil vapor extraction of soil containing elevated concentrations of chlorinated volatile organic compounds identified below building M-10A. Three soil vapor extraction wells were placed on-line in 2018 and cover remedial Areas 3 and 4. Reclassification of groundwater from Class GA to GB was completed in 2017. This reclassification prevents the Site from having to remediate to meet the Groundwater Protection Criteria, as defined in the state remediation standards. In 2018, additional deep and shallow groundwater recovery wells have been installed, as required by the CTDEEP. The expansion was required to increase the level of recovery of the chlorinated solvent plume in the southern parking lot (Area 6). This plume has been identified as effective downgradient residential properties. 6.0 SITE HISTORY ASTM Standards for Phase I ESAs require that historical records be searched for information on the Site dating back to the Site’s earliest development or 1940, whichever is earliest, based on available documentation. Standard historical sources, as defined by ASTM E 1527-13, were reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA. The following subsections summarize our review of available historical records. The Site was one of the first woolen mills in the United States and was originally developed by John and Arthur Schofield. The Uncasville Manufacturing Corporation operated at the Site into the early 20th century. A postcard image of the Site dated approximately 1906 is included in the photographs in Appendix 2. Pink Row used to be known as the Old Norwich and New London Road. It became known as Pink Row due to the presence of textile discharges to the river. The textile mill relied on hydro power for textile operations and the water for treating and dying. In approximately 1964, Thomas G. Faria Corporation purchased the property, and have manufactured gauges for motor powered vehicles since that time. Faria used chlorinated organic solvents, including tetrachloroethene, for degreasing metal parts until 1987. Faria also performed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 9 electroplating of metal parts from 1973 to 1981 and dried metal hydroxide sludges from its wastewater treatment system in a series of four state-permitted surface impoundments in the southern portion of the Site. The metal hydroxide sludge impoundments are considered clean closed by the EPA. 6.1 OWNERSHIP RECORDS No title search information was provided by the user. Ownership records provided by the Montville Tax Assessor’s Office were reviewed. The records obtained from the Town of Montville are included in Appendix 4 and indicated the following ownership: Record of Ownership Sale Date Book/Page Faria Beede Instruments Inc. 10/29/2015 610/361 Thomas G. Faria 8/14/2009 540/156 Martin Gottesdiener Trustee 9/5/1980 143/206 6.2 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS Two historical Sanborn maps for the Site were provided by Environmental Data Resources. Copies of these Sanborn maps are located in Appendix 4 and can be summarized as follows: Year Map Summary 1924 The Sanborn map identified the Site as occupied by “Uncasville-Shelton Company manufacturing mohair plushes”. The building layout was similar to the present. The larger buildings on the southern portion of the Site are identified as factory buildings. The map shows a head race, located in the northwest corner of the Site which apparently discharged to a Pen Stock which flowed to a generator located in Building M-14 (known as the Power House). The area of the head race is now a parking lot. The Pen Stock no longer exists. 1945 This map was similar to the 1924 map. The Site is identified as being occupied by “Sidney Blumenthal & Co, Inc. manufacturers of mohair plushes”. 6.3 CITY DIRECTORIES Available city directories dated 1961, 1967, 1973, 1977, 1986, 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003, 2008, and 2013 were reviewed for indications of Site and surrounding area property uses that may be indicative of potential environmental concerns. Thomas G. Faria Corporation was identified at 36 Pink Row in 1967 and 1972, 0 Pink Row in 1992, and at 38 Pink Row in 2013. Surrounding properties were evaluated for potential environmental concerns. The Montville Waste Water Plant was identified at 51 Pink Row in 1995 and at 83 Pink Row in 2003 and 2008. Other properties in the vicinity of the Site appeared to be residential. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 10 6.4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS The following historical aerial photographs were reviewed to obtain information relative to changes to the Site and surrounding area. Aerial photographs 1934, 1951, 1957, 1970, 1974, 1990, 1991, 1996, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012 are included in Appendix 4. The aerials can be summarized as follows: Aerial Photo (Year) Significant Land Use 1934-1974 Multiple buildings appeared take up most of the northeastern property. The rest of the Site appears to be undeveloped. 1991 The 1991 photograph appeared to be similar to the photograph from 1974. A small addition was observed on the southernmost building on-Site. A parking lot was observed on the southeastern portion of the Site. Due to the quality of the photograph it unclear if the parking area is paved. 2005 The buildings on-Site are present. No additional observations can be made due to the scale and quality of the photograph. 2006-2012 The 2006-2012 maps appeared to be similar to the photograph from 1991. The quality of these maps show that the parking area located on the southeastern portion of the Site is paved. 6.5 HISTORICAL USGS MAPS The following historical USGS maps dated 1892, 1893, 1921, 1939, 1949, 1958, 1970, 1983, and 2013 were reviewed relative to the Site and surrounding area. Copies of these historical USGS maps are located in Appendix 4. No significant information was ascertainable from the topographic maps reviewed. 7.0 GOVERNMENT RECORDS REVIEW AND INQUIRY The following sections document the information gathered during review of available environmental records, physical setting sources, and historical site use information. 7.1 MONTVILLE MUNICIPAL RECORDS Uncasville is located within the Town of Montville which is the municipal governing agency for the Site. Records and information from the Town of Montville municipal offices were acquired on October 1, 2018. Assessor’s Office. We obtained with copies of property cards for the Site from the Assessor’s on- line portal. A copy of the information is included in Appendix 4. Clerk’s Office. The Clerk’s Office provided DTE with a copy of the property deed. A copy of the information is included in Appendix 4. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 11 Building, Engineering, and Environmental Health Departments. The Building Department and Health Department did not have any pertinent records pertaining to the Site. Numerous building permits were found relative hearting and electrical upgrades. Fire Marshal’s Office. The Montville Fire Marshal maintained records of hazardous material storage, underground storage tanks (USTs) and aboveground storage tanks (ASTs). Pertinent documents are included in Appendix 5. The fire marshal reported that he performs annual fire code inspections of the Site. He was not aware of significant environmental issues related to current manufacturing practices. 7.2 CTDEEP RECORDS The following records were provided by the current Site management and from a file review conducted at the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP). The following provides only a brief summary of the most current file information relative to Remedial Action Plans and regulatory review and comments since 2016. Pertinent file information is included in Appendix 5 and summarized below. The file contained a large volume of reports (as summarized on Table 1) and correspondence related to RCRA Facility Investigations, investigation addenda, risk assessments and interim remedial actions (pump and treat system), closures and remedial plans. 1. CTDEEP Letter to AEI - Dated June 16, 2016 - On June 16, 2016, Mr. Robert Bell of the CTDEEP sent a letter to Faria-Beede (included in Appendix 5) which summarized a meeting between the CTDEEP and Faria Beede on May 12, 2016. At the meeting, AEI’s May 2015 Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was discussed in light of Dakota Partners’ proposal to convert the industrial property to residential use. Some of the CTDEEP’s comments can be summarized as follows: a. Updating the Remedial Action Plan - Faria should prepare a detailed updated RAP that demonstrates how Faria’s clean-up will conform to the proposed future residential use at the site, and which includes remedial for soil in Areas 1, 2 and 3 which will satisfy the RSRs. b. Groundwater Monitoring and Reporting – Groundwater monitoring was not completed in 2015. CTDEEP requested that Faria provide written notice of its intent to continue monitoring or submit a revised plan that proposes a new monitoring plan. c. Groundwater Pump & Treat System – The CTDEEP requested the results of Faria’s evaluation if the pump and treat system was shut down, as proposed. The CTEEP requested that Faria address non-compliance issues related to the discharge of pump and treat wastewaters to Oxoboxo Brook. d. Groundwater Reclassification – The CTDEEP requested mapping and notifications related to the reclassification of groundwater at the Site from GA to GB. We understand that the groundwater reclassification is moving forward. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 12 e. Requests for Reuse of Polluted Soil – The CTDEEP indicated that it stopped evaluating three pending requests to reuse polluted soil as fill in the southern portion of the Site until Faria submitted an updated RAP the complies with the Remediation Standard Regulations. The CTDEEP requested information related to the proposed future use of the property for residential purposes as part of their evaluation of the polluted soil reuse requests. 2. CTDEEP Ground Water Reclassification Confirmation Dated December 15, 2016 – The CTDEEP issued a notice to Faria indicating the proposed final language to be incorporated into the reclassification of groundwater from GA to GB. The letter is included in Appendix 5. 3. CTDEEP Disapproval of RAP Letter Dated March 17, 2017 - On March 17, 2017, the CTDEEP issued Faria-Beede a disapproval of AEI’s RAP revised in October 2016. The letter states that the RAP disapproval was based on AEI’s proposal to shut-down the groundwater pump and treat system “without providing sufficient rationale for preventing potential health risks associated with the polluted groundwater on and emanating from the Faria Beede site. Specifically, the RAP does not adequately address potential soil vapor concerns at nearby residential properties once the pump and treat system is shut off. It also fails to identify the manner in which Faria Beede will demonstrate compliance with the regulatory requirements regarding the off-site migration of polluted groundwater from the site.” The letter is included in Appendix 5. 4. Letter to DEEP from AEI - Dated April 9, 2017 - This letter is included in Appendix 5 and provided a schedule and operations and maintenance plans to: a. Upgrade the groundwater pump and treat system, b. A revised groundwater monitoring plan, and c. A sub-slab depressurization system Operations and Maintenance plan, as required by CTDEEP’s March 2017 Disapproval letter. 5. Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, June 2016 (Revised October 2016, Revised May 2017), AEI, Inc. - Dated May 21, 2017 - This submittal presented AEI’s revised plans for remediation/corrective action at the Site, in response to CTDEEP’s March 2017 letter. The revised RAP is included in Appendix 3. 6. DEEP & EPA Comments on the Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, Revised May 2017 - Dated October 11, 2017 - The CTDEEP and EPA provided specific and general comments to AEI remedial action plans and progress. 7. CTDEEP RAP Comments Dated February 8, 2018 - On February 8, 2018, the CTDEEP and EPA provided comments to the October 2017 revision to a RAP prepared by AEI. This letter is included in Appendix 5. In addition to the comments to the RAP, the comments requested the following be submitted by AEI: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 13 a. Start-up and O&M for the expanding groundwater pump and treat system; b. Submittal of Revised Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP); c. Proposed soil vapor sampling at residential properties; d. Sampling/remediation of Interior Courtyard lead exceedances; e. Long-term stewardship permit application; f. ELUR application; and, g. Groundwater monitoring, operations and maintenance and annual reporting. 7.3 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES DTE reviewed federal and state environmental records in the form of an environmental database report provided by EDR®. A copy of the database report is included as Appendix 6. The findings of the EDR report are summarized on Table 3. As summarized on Table 3 and the EDR report, the Site is listed in the following federal and state databases: Property Transfer Act, Brownfields, hazard waste manifests, spills, enforcement, Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS), Facility Index System (FINDS), National Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA), Engineering Controls (ENG CONTROLS), Corrective Action (CORRACTS), Leachate Wastewater Disposal System (LWDS), Site Discovery and Assessment Database (SDADB), and underground storage tanks (USTs). Inclusion in these databases is the result of the past and current industrial operations and the environmental releases identified at the Site. As also summarized on Table 3, one property in the immediate vicinity and likely upgradient of the Site was identified in the database search. The Montville Auto Inc., Corner Tire Center, Ricks Auto and Texaco Gas Station at 341 Norwich-New London Turnpike is located to the southwest and likely upgradient of the Site. The property is listed for historic automobile repair, underground storage tanks (USTs), waste manifests, and the state’s Leachate Wastewater Disposal System databases. 8.0 APPLICABILITY OF CONNECTICUT’S PROPERTY TRANSFER ACT Based on the information reviewed, the Site is an establishment and subject to the requirements of the Property Transfer Act. Per Connecticut General Statutes 22a-134(a)(3), “Establishment” means any real property at which or any business operation from which (A) on or after November 19, 1980, there was generated, except as the result of (i) remediation of polluted soil, groundwater or sediment, or (ii) the removal or abatement of building materials, more than one hundred kilograms of hazardous waste in any one month, (B) hazardous waste generated at a different location was recycled, reclaimed, reused, stored, handled, treated, transported or disposed of, (C) the process of dry cleaning was conducted on or after May 1, 1967, (D) furniture stripping was conducted on or after May 1, 1967, or (E) a vehicle body repair facility was located on or after May 1, 1967 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 14 The Property Transfer Act is administered by the CTDEEP. The program requires the disclosure of environmental conditions when certain properties and/or businesses ("Establishments") are transferred. When transferring real estate that meets the definition of an Establishment, the environmental condition of the entire parcel needs to be evaluated and reported to the CTDEP on prescribed forms. The requirements of the Property Transfer Program are specified in Section 22a-134 of the Connecticut General Statutes. 9.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE Since October 2018, DTE personnel have visited the Site and observed surficial conditions and evidence of releases of oil or hazardous materials are the Site. General site features are shown on Figure 2. Site photographs are provided in Appendix 3. 9.1 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS The Site is fully utilized for various manufacturing and warehouse operations by Faria Beede. No evidence of impacts to Oxoboxo Brook were readily apparent. The stream channel was overgrown with brush. The storage of oil or hazardous materials was observed to be conducted inside the buildings or enclosures and included containment structures capable of preventing leaks and spills from impacting the environment. Waste paints are stored in 55-gallon drums in a trailer located in the southwestern portion of the Site (Figure 2). 9.2 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS In many instances, stored material and equipment prevented the ability to make direct observations of floors and surfaces for floor drains or evidence of releases. In general, the management of oil and hazardous materials appeared to be consistent with typical manufacturing operations. Chemical containers were labelled. Waste chemicals were stored on spill containment pallets. 9.3 ASBESTOS In 2017, an asbestos survey of the buildings was completed by Nobis Engineering of Naugatuck, Connecticut. The report identified relatively limited amounts of asbestos within the buildings, consistent with the age of the structures. The Hazardous Buildings Materials Assessment report (HBMA) should be reviewed for relevant information. 9.4 LEAD-BASED PAINT In 2017, a Lead Based Paint survey of the buildings was completed by Boston Lead of Meriden, Connecticut. Boston Lead’s report was part of the above-mentioned Hazardous Building Materials Assessment report (HBMA) completed by Nobis Engineering. Lead based paint was identified in the buildings. This was consistent with the age of the structures. The HBMA report should be reviewed for relevant information. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 15 9.5 RADON General information pertaining to radon in the Site area was obtained from the EDR report, as summarized below. In 2016, Nobis Engineering collected four radon samples on-site. These results are summarized below. 9.5.1 Radon Map Results from EDR The EPA has prepared a map to assist national, state, and local organizations to target their resources and to implement radon-resistant building codes. Review of the EPA Radon Summary indicated that of 101 sites tested for radon in Montville, eighty-four were found to have radon below the action level of 4.0 pCi/L. Eleven tested locations had radon greater than 4 pCi/L but less than 10 pCi/L, five had radon levels between 10 and 20 pCi/L and one location had radon between 20 and 50 pCi/L. 9.5.2 Site Specific Radon Testing Nobis Engineering collected four radon samples from the Site in 2016. The radon tests were performed using liquid scintillation radon detectors supplied by EMSL Analytical Laboratories of Cinnaminson, New Jersey and counted on a liquid scintillation counter by EMSL using approved EPA testing protocols for Radon in Air testing. The sample locations and results can be summarized as follows: Sample ID Analytical Result (pCi/L) Location Description Test 1 Test 2 Bldg M-14 - Power House Basement 1.8 1.5 Earth floor of restricted access building. Field stone foundation Bldg M-4 Basement – Closet 1 12.9 13.1 Enclosed closet – Concrete floor and field stone foundation. Bldg M-4 Basement – Closet 2 1.4 1.6 Enclosed closet – Concrete floor and field stone foundation. Bldg M-13 Basement Stairs 9.3 8.5 Enclosed stairwell – west end of building EPA’s Action Level of 4 pCi/L was exceeded in two samples, as indicated above. 9.6 PCB-CONTAINING EQUIPMENT AND BUILDING MATERIALS No information was obtained indicating that PCB-containing transformers are located at the facility. Three active transformers located east of Building M-14 and one newer active transformer located north of Building M-10A are marked as non-PCB. Three inactive transformers located north of Building M-13 are not marked and their status is not known. It is believed that the transformers are the property of Eversource. Multiple dry-type transformers are located through-out the Site. The HBMA report identified relatively low levels of PCBs in paint applied to the interior of Building M-4. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 16 9.7 MOLD A mold survey was not within the scope of this Phase I ESA or prior assessments provided for review. 10.0 INTERVIEWS In accordance with ASTM E 1527-13, interviews with present owners, operators, and occupants of the Site were conducted wherever possible, for the purpose of gathering information regarding the potential for RECs at the Site. The following presents a summary of the interviews that were conducted. 10.1 INTERVIEW WITH OWNER REPRESENTATIVE Mr. Richard Weiss is an Industrial Engineering Manager at Faria and appeared well versed in the status of environmental characterization of the Site. Mr. Weiss reported that he was not aware of releases of oil or hazardous materials at the Site, other than what was currently being investigated and remediation. 10.2 INTERVIEW WITH SITE MANAGER See information from Richard Weiss summarized in Section 10.1. 10.3 INTERVIEWS WITH OCCUPANTS See information from Richard Weiss summarized in Section 10.1. 10.4 INTERVIEWS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS The results of interviews and research at local government offices were discussed in Section 7.3. 10.5 INTERVIEWS WITH OTHERS DTE did not conduct interviews with others. 11.0 ADDITIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND DEVIATIONS 11.1 ADDITIONS No other additions to the ASTM E 1527-13 Phase I ESA practice were made than were noted above. 11.2 EXCEPTIONS AND DEVIATIONS No significant exceptions and/or deviations to the ASTM E 1527-13 Phase I ESA practice were made. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 17 12.0 DATA GAPS ASTM E 1527-13 requires the identification of data gaps that may affect our ability to identify potential environmental conditions on the Site, to further identify the sources of information consulted to attempt to fill these data gaps, and the significance of the data gap with regard to the ability to identify potential environmental conditions on-Site. Regarding this Phase I ESA, the following data gaps were identified: 1. The lack of interviews with past owners and certain local governmental officials is a data gap. However, due to the fact that significant environmental characterization of the Site has been conducted, this data gap is not considered to affect the overall conclusions of this Phase I ESA. 2. The large industrial buildings are full of equipment and other stored materials which obscured the majority of the floor space and limited the ability to make observations. 13.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Site is regulated by the RCRA Corrective Action remediation program and the Property Transfer Act. Seventeen AOCs/RECs have been identified relative to current or past storage of oils and hazardous materials, spills, and known environmental impacts to Site soil and groundwater. Remediation is in progress in at least six Areas of Concern and is currently being overseen by Faria Beede’s environmental consultant, Applied Environmental Interface of Middlefield, Connecticut. To date, remedial actions have included soil excavation and capping, soil vapor extraction, and upgrades to the existing groundwater pump and treat containment system. We understand that additional remedial actions are being considered by Dakota Partners to more fully comply with the state’s Remediation Standard Regulations. Future remedial actions will be coordinated with potential redevelopment of the Site. 14.0 LIMITATIONS Down To Earth has performed this Phase I ESA in conformance with ASTM Practice E 1527-13. This ESA was designed to provide the client with a broad overview of environmental conditions existing at the Site. No subsurface investigations or laboratory analysis were conducted as part of this investigation. This report is for the use and benefit of, and may be depended upon by, the Client or its affiliates, and third parties with prior written permission by Down To Earth, as well as the lender(s) in conjunction with a secured financing of the subject property, and their corresponding successors and assignees. Acceptance of this report by a third party signifies an agreement that any use or dependence on this report shall be circumscribed by the exceptions and limitations in this report, with the admission that real Site conditions may alter with time, and that hidden conditions may exist at the subject property that were not perceivable within the scope of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 18 No other representation is made to any third party by Down To Earth, except that the degree of concern and skill regularly exercised by environmental consultants has been used in the assembling of data and information and preparation of the report related thereto. No other warranties are made to any third party, either explicit or implicit. 15.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS The following individuals performed this Phase I ESA in conformance with ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13 and AAI Standards. Any work completed on this Phase I ESA by an individual who is not considered an environmental professional was completed under the supervision or responsible charge of the environmental professional listed after the Environmental Professionals Statement provided below. We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Sarah Anderson Timothy Carr, LEP Environmental Scientist Senior Project Manager Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria-Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, Connecticut February 8, 2019 – Page 19 16.0 REFERENCES LOCAL RESOURCES Montville Town Hall ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 1. Historical Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 2. Historical USGS Maps of New England. 3. USGS Topographic Quadrangle. 4. EDR® Database Report Dated October 5, 2018. 5. ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, American Society for Testing and Materials, Conshohocken, PA. 6. Site Characterization Guidance Document (Connecticut DEEP; September 2007, Revised December 2010). 7. Bedrock Geologic Map of Connecticut (Connecticut Geological and Natural History Survey, 1985) (obtained online at http://tmsc.org/geology/bedrock/). 8. CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Environmental Conditions Online, (http://www.cteco.uconn.edu/advanced_viewer.htm); Recognized Environmental Condition - the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, past release, or material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with the law. Areas of Concern - locations or areas at a site where hazardous waste and or hazardous substances (including petroleum products) have been or may have been used, stored, treated, handled, disposed, spilled, and/or released to the environment. FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT NO.QUADRANGLE LOCATION LOCUS PLAN Thomas G. Faria Corporation 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 91730.00 DATE: September 2016 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 INCH = 2,000 FEET Uncasville, CT September 2016 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP HELTCO6567PRI-M215BRIDGEOHW CPCO6564CL&P6255CL&P6256POLE12793POLE2746SNET2952SIGNLP TANKSLPCL&P2744SIGNPRI-M216SIGN UTUTUT CL&P2745SIGNA/CGUTGGAREA463,658 S.F.10.6441 AC.UTUTUTUTMH'SOHW TRANSPADUTSIGNFLAGPOLESGUTOHW UT RW - 1 0 1 GROUNDWATER RECOVERYSYSTEM (RW-101)HELTCO6566HELTCO6565GG16" GGG GG16"16"16 " G .M .OHWPOLEPOLEHELTCO6568HELTCO6570A/CTRANSPRI-M217SUPPORTPOLES UTA/CLPLPUT UT UTUTSoil VaporExtraction SystemTrailerSITE PLAN & AREAS OF CONCERNFARIA INDUSTRIES42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:JDVTFC91730.00OCTOBER 2018FIGURE 20100'200'0100'200'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETNOTES:1.THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASEMAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2.EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES.LEGENDAPPROXIMATE MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONMW-1MW-200MW-202RMW-202PZMW-205SMW-205DMW-201MW-204DMW-204SMW-4RMW-4DMW-4R2PZ-3PZ-2PZ-1MW-3RMW-104MW-2MW-102RW-120MW-103MW-105AREA 1AREA 2AREA 3AREA 4AREA 6CLEAN FILL AREAREMEDIATION TARGET AREAS:1.FORMER AST AND PAH IMPACTED SOIL2.METALS IMPACTED SOIL IN ALLEY3.PAH, METALS AND VOC IMPACTED SOIL (EXTERIOR)4.VOC IMPACTED SOIL (INTERIOR)5.LIMITED PAHS IN OXOBOXO BROOK SEDIMENTS6.VOC IMPACTED SOIL AND FORMER ONSITE SEPTIC TANKAND FIELDAREA 1REMEDIATION AREA DESIGNATION BYAPPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACEAREA OF CLEAN FILLPLACED 2016(10 FT HIGH +/-)TELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERSVE WELLGROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREATWELLSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLSRW-101RW-301SRW-302SRW-303DRW-303SRW-304SRW-301SAREA 5 Notes: Data obtained from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data download web page and Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online (CT ECO). The information was obtained from an internet download on October 10, 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT Scale: See Map Figure No. 6 Drawn By: NBK Checked By: TFC Site 42 Pink Row GA Groundwater may be impaired Water Supply Well Impaired GB Groundwater Oxoboxo Brook B Surface Water Thames River 3 TABLES 1 TABLE 1 LISTING OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS Thomas G. Faria Corporation 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT 1. "Woodard & Curran, 2000. Thomas G. Faria Corporation RCRA Facility Investigation Report, Woodard & Curran: Cheshire, Connecticut. June 16, 2000. 2. ENSR, 2006. Supplemental RFI Comments; Thomas G. Faria Corporation; Uncasville, Connecticut. (Correspondence to Stephanie Carr, EPA Region 1 dated February 15, 2006.) ENSR: Westford, Massachusetts. 3. ENSR, 2007, “Supplemental RFI Status Report, Thomas G. Faria Corporation; Uncasville, Connecticut. (Correspondence to Stephanie Carr, EPA Region 1 dated February 13, 2007.) ENSR: Westford, Massachusetts. 4. ENSR, 2007, “Residential and Off-Site Monitoring Well Data Report; Thomas G. Faria Corporation; Uncasville, Connecticut”. (Correspondence to Drew Kukucka, CTDEP dated December 5, 2007. ENSR: Westford, Massachusetts. 5. "Woodard & Curran, 2000. Thomas G. Faria Corporation RCRA Facility Investigation Report, Woodard & Curran: Cheshire, Connecticut. June 16, 2000. 6. ENSR, 2008, “Supplemental RFI Status Report Soil Addendum; Thomas G. Faria Corporation; Uncasville, Connecticut”. (Correspondence to Stephanie Carr, EPA Region 1 dated January 8, 2008. ENSR: Westford, Massachusetts. 7. ENSR, 2008, “Corrective Measures Study Work Plan, Thomas G. Faria Corporation, Uncasville, Connecticut”. (Correspondence to Stephanie Carr, EPA Region 1 dated March 20, 2008, ENSR: Westford, Massachusetts. 8. ENSR, 2008. “Response to EPA Comments on Corrective Measures Study Work Plan, Thomas G. Faria Corporation; Uncasville, Connecticut. (Correspondence to Stephanie Carr, EPA Region 1 dated May 19, 2008”. ENSR, Westford, Massachusetts. 9. ENSR, 2008, “Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment Addendum, Thomas G. Faria Corporation; Uncasville, Connecticut” ENSR, Westford, Massachusetts. July 2008. 10. ENSR,2008, “System Monitoring Report; Thomas G. Faria Corporation; Uncasville, Connecticut”, ENSR: Westford, Massachusetts. September 2008. 11. ENSR. 2008. “Supplemental RFI Status Report Soil Addendum: Thomas G. Faria Corporation, Uncasville, Connecticut”. (Correspondence to Stephanie Carr, EPA Region 1 dated September 18, 2008.) ENSR: Westford, Massachusetts. 12. AECOM, 2009. “Corrective Measures Study. Thomas G. Faria – Uncasville, Connecticut. AECOM, Inc.” April 2009, revised August 2009. 13. AECOM, 2012. “Corrective Measure Implementation (CMI) Plan, Thomas G. Faria – Uncasville, Connecticut”. AECOM, Inc. February 2012. 14. AECOM, 2012. “Response to USEPA Comments on the CMI Plan dated February 2012, Thomas G. Faria Corporation, Uncasville, Connecticut CTD04038744”, August 31, 2012. 15. AEI 2014, “Draft Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, Faria Beede, Uncasville, Connecticut”, May 2014. 16. AEI 2016, “Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, Faria Beede, Uncasville, Connecticut”, June 2016. 2 17. AEI 2016, “Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, Faria Beede, Uncasville, Connecticut”, June 2016 Revised May 2017. 18. AEI 2016, “Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, Faria Beede, Uncasville, Connecticut”, June 2016 Revised October 2017. 19. AEI 2016, “Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, Faria Beede, Uncasville, Connecticut”, June 2016 Revised March 2018. G:\MY DRIVE\FARIA\FARIA PHASE I\PHASE I ESA - 2019\TABLE 1 - FARIA HISTORICAL REPORTS REFERENCE LIST.DOCX MAP ID SITE NAME ADDRESS CITY DATABASES Estima te GW FLOW ELEV DIST (ft) 1 FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS 385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK MONTVILLE CT PROPERTY 2 THOMAS G FARIA CORPORATION 385 NOWICH NEW LONDON TPK MONTVILLE BROWNFIELDS 3 FARIA THOMAS G CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK UNCASVILLE MANIFEST 4 385 NORWICH/NEW LONDON TPK MONTVILLE SPILLS 5 FARIA THOMAS G CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK UNCASVILLE MANIFEST,ENF,AIRS 6 FARIA CORP, THOMAS G 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TPK UNCASVILLE AIRS 7 THOMAS G. FARIA CORPORATION 385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK MONTVILLE FINDS,ICIS,ECHO 8 THOMAS G. FARIA CORPORATION 385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK MONTVILLE NPDES 9 FARIA THOMAS G CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK UNCASVILLE RCRA-SQG, MANIFEST, US ENG CONTROLS, RCRA-TSDF, CORRACTS, RAATS, 2020 COR ACTION,SEMS-ARCHIVE 10 THOMAS G FARIA CORPORATION 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TPK MONTVILLE ICIS 11 THOMAS G. FARIA CORPORATION 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TPK UNCASVILLE NPDES,ENF 12 THOMAS G FARIA CORP PINK ROW MONTVILLE LWDS 13 THOMAS G FARIA CORP PINK ROW MONTVILLE LWDS 14 THOMAS FARIA CORP.PINK STREET MONTVILLE SDADB,CPCS,SHWS 15 D W TRANSPORT & LEASING INC 33 PEQUOT RD UNCASVILLE US AIRS,ICIS,RCRA NONGEN / NLR Cross Lower 46 16 CORNER TIRE CENTER 341 NORWICH-NW LONDON TPK UNCASVILLE EDR HIST AUTO Up Higher 141 17 MONTVILLE AUTO INC 341 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE UNCASVILLE UST Up Higher 141 18 MONTVILLE AUTO INC 341 NRWICH NEW LNDON TWKP UNCASVILLE EDR HIST AUTO Up Higher 201 19 RICKS AUTO LLC 341 RT 32 UNCASVILLE MANIFEST Up Higher 201 20 THOMAS G. FARIA CORPORATION 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE UST 21 THAMES PERMACRETE CORPORATION PINK ROW UNCASVILLE UST Cross Lower 211 22 TEXACO GAS STATION 341 NEW LONDON TURNPIKE MONTVILLE LWDS Up Higher 264 23 W & B KEENEY INC 309 NORWICH NEW LONDON TP UNCASVILLE EDR HIST CLEANER Up Higher 483 24 MONTIVILLE TOWN HALL 310 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TPK UNCASVILLE MANIFEST Up Higher 490 25 TOWN OF MONTVILLE TOWN HALL 310 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK UNCASVILLE MANIFEST Up Higher 490 26 MONTVILLE TOWN HALL 310 NORWICH - NEW LONDON TRPK UNCASVILLE MANIFEST Up Higher 490 27 TOWN OF MONTVILLE 310 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK UNCASVILLE MANIFEST Up Higher 490 28 TOWN HALL BUILDING 310 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE UNCASVILLE UST Up Higher 490 29 MONTVILLE CO (7321)12 LATHROP RD UNCASVILLE UST Down Higher 495 30 UNCASVILLE SCHOOL NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE.UNCASVILLE UST Cross Higher 641 31 MONTVILLE POLICE STATION FORT SHANTOK RD.UNCASVILLE UST Cross Higher 641 32 JOHN J DOYLE SAND & GRAVEL CO US MINES Cross Lower 858 33 MONTVILLE TOWN WPCF 51 PINK ROW MONTVILLE LWDS Cross Lower 1,264 34 MIDWAY MOBIL 568 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE.MONTVILLE UST Cross Higher 1,284 35 A E S THAMES INC 125 DEPOT RD UNCASVILLE MANIFEST,SPILLS,LUST, NPDES,ENF Down Lower 1,871 36 STONE CONTAINER 125 DEPOT ROAD MONTVILLE SDADB,CPCS Down Lower 1,899 37 MONTVILLE POWER LLC 74 LATHROP RD UNCASVILLE RCRA- SQG,MANIFEST,MANIFES T, MANIFEST,RCRA TSDF, CORRACTS, 2020 COR ACTION,US AIRS Cross Lower 2,382 Target Property Target Property Target Property Target Property Target Property Target Property NOTES: 1. Information downloaded from EDR database as of October 10, 2018. Target Property Target Property TABLE 3 FARIA-BEEDE INSTRUMENTS UNCASVILLE, CT EDR MAPPED PROPERTIES AND DATABASE IDENTIFICATION PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Target Property Target Property Target Property Target Property Target Property Target Property Target Property AOC Description Date Duration Volume Status AOC#1 -Former Surface Impoundment Sludge containing solvents generated from plating wastewater treatment process discharged to unlined impoundments 1973 -1981 Continuous discharge Unknown Remediated per AECOM - Covered by 8-ft of clean fill in 2016 AOC#2 -Groundwater Pump & Treat System Solvent impacted groundwater extracted, aerated, then discharged to unlined pond which overflowed to Oxoboxo Brook 1985 - Current Continuous discharge Unknown Switched to an aeration tray stripper and activated carbon sorption unit with a CTDEEP permit to discharge to Oxoboxo Brook AOC#3 -Former Outside Storage Area Solvents spilled on soil 1982 One-time release 2 gallons Interim remediation performed. Final remedy pending (excavation and SVE). AOC#4 -Former Septic System Sanitary wastewaters and industrial discharges containing solvents discharged to subsurface via septic system 1964 - 1987 Discontinued in 1987 Unknown Remediation underway via groundwater pump and treat AOC#5 -Storage Trailer Paints and paint-waste stored in trailer. Current Use No Discharge No Discharge No evidence of release, no investigation warranted per AECOM. No surficial evidence of spill per Down To Earth. AOC#6 -Boiler House Storage Area Used to store metal hydroxide sludge, and solvents from 4/81 to 2/82. Fuel oil release occurred on 2/8/85 April 1981 to Feb 1982 Feb 8, 1985 One time fuel oil release 10 gallons Investigated per AECOM AOC#7 -Inside Drum Storage Area, Former Plating and WWTS Area Metal hydroxide sludge generated from plating process, solvents from vapor degreaser 1973 -1993 Unknown Unknown Investigated per AECOM AOC#8 -Discharge to Oxoboxo Brook See AOC#2 1985 - Current Continuous discharge Unknown Investigated - No remediation required per AECOM AOC#9 -Former Gasoline USTs -2,000-galion leaded gasoline UST -10,000-gallon unleaded gasoline UST 7/1974 - 11/1990 8/1980 - 11/1990 No Discharge No Discharge Investigated per AECOM AOC#10 -ASTs Two 275-gallon kerosene ASTs, two 275-gallon unleaded gasoline ASTs 10,000 gal fuel oil AST in Bldg M-6. Varies Inactive in Bldg M-6 No Discharge No Discharge Investigated per AECOM AOC#11 - Spray Painting Area Spray painting of metal parts Current Use No Discharge No Discharge Investigated per AECOM AOC#12 -Etching Room Nitric acid used Not Specified No Discharge No Discharge No evidence of release, no investigation warranted per AECOM AOC#13 -Scrap Metal Storage Area Scrap metal stored Not Specified No Discharge No Discharge No evidence of release, no investigation warranted per AECOM AOC#14 -Solder Area Waste lead dross is stored in steel pails Current Use No Discharge No Discharge No evidence of release, no investigation warranted per AECOM AOC#15 -Lacquer Thinner Spill Lacquer thinner released outside spray paint area. 1986 One-time release 5-gallons Investigated per AECOM AOC#16 - Unidentified Source of Groundwater Contamination Near Wells MW-3S and MW-3D (east-central site area) Elevated solvents in groundwater - (possibly related to AOC 2 and other sources in that area)Unknown Unknown Unknown Investigated - Remediation underway via groundwater pump and treat AOC#17 -Electrical Transformers Several locations of possible PCB-containing transformers. Unknown Unknown Unknown Investigated per AECOM Notes: 1. Areas of Concern (AOCs) were identified in various reports prepared by AECOM and others. The status of investigation and remediation has been updated based on our current understanding of the remedial action planning. 2. For the purposes of this Phase I ESA, AOCs are considered synonymous with Recognized Environmental Conditions, as defined by ASTM. TABLE 2 AREAS OF CONCERN (AOCs) FARIA BEEDE FACILITY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT G:\My Drive\Faria\Faria Phase I\Phase I ESA - 2019\Table 2 - List of AOCs-RECs APPENDIX 1 USER QUESTIONNAIRE APPENDIX 2 PHOTOGRAPHS Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 1 Description: Historic photograph looking to the southwest of M-4/M-4a to the right and M-7 on the left based on a post card dated 1909. At the time, the Site housed a textile mill which specialized in the manufacture of mohair plushes. Description: View of the southern portion of the Site (from the area of fill placed in 2017) looking towards the northwest. Building M-14 is in the foreground. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 2 Description: View looking to the southwest of Building M-8 which contains offices, looking towards the west. Description: View of Oxoboxo Brook looking to the west from Building M-12. Building M-4 is visible in the upper right hand side of the photograph. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 3 Description: Photograph of Building M-6 which houses a 10,000-gallon fuel oil aboveground storage tank. The tank is no longer used and reportedly contains petroleum sludge. Description: View of an instrument assembly area located in Building M-11. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 4 Description: Photograph of machining area located in Building M-10. Description: Three inactive electrical transformers were observed in the courtyard and on the north exterior wall of Building M-13. The transformers were not marked with respect to PCBs and their ownership is also not known. PCB impacts have not been identified in soil samples obtained below the transformers. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 5 Description: Photograph of three active electrical transformers enclosed by chain link fence located on a concrete pad on the west side of the power house (Building M-14). These transformers are mark non-PCB and are believed to be owned by the electric utility. Description: A groundwater pump and treatment system is located in the basement of Building M- 13. The remedial system was designed to prevent the off-site migration of groundwater contaminated by chlorinated solvents. Groundwater is pumped from recovery well RW-101, through a tray aerator and then through activated carbon. Treated water is discharged to Oxoboxo Brook in accordance with a state discharge permit. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 6 Description: Photograph of a shed housing a 275-gallon aboveground diesel/kerosene storage tank located at the west end of Building M-13. Description: Photograph of the diesel/kerosene tank and containment. No evidence of a release was observed. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 7 Description: Drums accumulating regulated wastes were observed being stored in Building M-6. Description: Photograph of hazardous waste drum storage (less than 90 day) which is conducted in a tractor trailer located west of Building M-13. This location stores mostly waste paints. The drums were marked and stored on containment pallets. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 8 Description: A paint spray booth is located in the southwest corner of Building M-13. Description: Photograph of plastic injection molding machines located in Building M-10A. APPENDIX 3 REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN (AEI, REVISED March 2018) Table 3A Summary of Soil Vapor Laboratory Data During SVE Startup Testing Faria Beede Instruments Uncasville, Connecticut Date Received: 09/29/17 Analytical Method: GC/MS Whole Air Canisters; EPA TO-15 Date Prepped: 09/29/17 Sample Number RSV-VC SVE-1 SVE-2 SVE-3 Combined Effluent (SVE-1, 2 and 3) Air Volume Liters 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 SVE system airflow (acfm)215 126 166 172 Compounds ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm Acetone 2400 ND<0.0025 0.022 ND<0.0025 0.019 Chloroform 4.5 ND<0.0025 0.011 0.036 0.0046 Cyclohexane 110 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 0.087 Dichlorodifluoromethane 8 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 0.047 0.012 1,1-Dichloroethane 850 0.0035 0.022 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 ND<0.0025 0.006 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene NE 0.012 1.3 0.10 0.031 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene NE ND<0.0025 0.11 0.016 0.0037 Ethyl Benzene 1650 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 0.0027 Heptane NE ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 0.0066 Hexane 78 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 0.11 Isooctane NE ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 0.55 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 2400 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 0.044 2-Propanol NE ND<0.0025 1.0 ND<0.0025 0.02 Propene NE ND<0.0025 0.0064 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 0.0046 ND<0.0025 Tetrachloroethylene*11 2.6 18 34 0.93 Tetrahydrofuran 0.1 ND<0.0025 3.2 0.043 0.11 Toluene 760 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 ND<0.0025 0.049 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1310 0.023 0.60 0.056 0.016 Trichloroethylene 7 0.045 0.84 0.33 0.024 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane NE 0.050 ND<0.0025 0.0037 0.013 **Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOC)2.7 25.1 34.6 2.0 * I/C SV-VC for PCE = 27 ppm Bold Exceeds Residential Soil Vapor Volatilization Criteria (RSV-VC) **This value is a summation of all peak areas present in the sample (quantitated as toluene). SVE-1, SVE-2 and SVE-3 data were collected on a single well at a time. Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)MW-102Screened Interval (ft bg)14-24Date Sampled11/13/13 6/8/16 11/12/13 11/20/14 6/8/16 11/12/13 11/13/13 11/20/14Is Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)YESUSEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000 ND ND ND ND ND NDND NDBenzene 710 215 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEthylbenzene 580,000 50,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDToluene 4,000,000 23,500 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDVinyl Chloride 15,7502ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,1 -DCA** 4,100 34,600 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,1-DCE 961ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDcis 1,2-DCE** 6,200 ND ND 2.5 ND ND ND ND NDtrans 1,2-DCE** 10,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,1,1 -TCA 62,000 20,400 ND ND 1.3 ND ND ND ND ND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDTrichloroethylene 2,340219ND ND2.9 ND NDNDNDNDTetrachloroethylene88 1,500ND ND 6.0 ND 1.1 1.7 5.6 4.5Tetrahydrofuran* 9,600 250 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDXylenes** 270 21,300ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*YES YES10-20 9.85-19.85 17-27MW-105 MW-2 MW-103Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)ONSITE UPGRADIENT NORTH OF OXOBOXONo Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 1 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.PZ-15-2011/13/13 11/20/14 11/12/13 11/21/14 11/13/13 11/13/13 6/8/16 6/8/16YESND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND 1.2NDNDNDND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND 9.6 5.8 ND ND ND 8.9ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND 11ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND 4.8 6.9 1.0 ND ND 9.06.7 15 9.4 28 ND ND 18 2.3ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDYES40-5014-24 46-58RW-120MW-3R(BRX) MW-104ONSITE FORMER AERATION BASIN AREAADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 2 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.MW-4D (RE1)MW-4R(BRX)MW-4R andMW-4RDilution MW-4R2unknown unknown11/11/13 11/21/14 11/13/13 11/13/13 6/23/17 11/13/13 6/10/16 6/26/17YESND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND2.9 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / ND1.7 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / ND5.1ND ND ND ND / ND ND2.5/2.3(+)ND / ND29 ND ND 5.6 7.9 / 9.3 ND 4.2/3.6 1.1 / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND 11/9.6 4.2 / 3.7ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / ND4708326020 25 / 30 ND 5.1/5.0 2.11,800 2,100 3,500 240 400 / 440ND380/350 400 / 350ND ND ND NDND / ND ND ND ND / NDND ND ND NDND / ND NDNDND / ND66-75.55-20unknownMW-4DPZ-2 and PZ-2 DilutionONSITEFORMER SEPTIC AND LEACHING FIELD AREAADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 3 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.MW-M10S (RE1)26-2711/26/13 11/26/13 6/9/16 6/23/17 11/26/13 6/23/17 11/26/13 6/9/16 6/23/17 11/26/13ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND6.0 5.2 / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND4.9 ND 5.3 5.3 / ND ND ND 6.4 3.5 2.7 / ND ND3.5ND1.5 1.7 / NDND ND6.7 3.1 2.1 / NDND13 8.6 44/42 57 / 50 ND ND 9.0 18/15 17 / 16 5.6ND ND ND / ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND3.8 ND 2.3 2.4 / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND18 11 31/36 43 / 41 ND ND 53 120/130 120 / 120 34830 650 1800/1700 2,000 / 1,40023 ND990 1300/1100 1,100 / 910 800ND ND ND / ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND26-2729-3044-45MW-M9S and MW-M9S DilutionMW-M9D MW-10S and 10S with DilutionFORMER SEPTIC AND LEACHING FIELD AREAONSITEADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 4 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.MW-5unknown11/26/13 6/23/17 11/12/1311/12/13 11/20/14 11/11//13 11/20/14 6/10/16 6/23/17 11/11/13 6/23/17ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND 2.1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND8.1 16 5.3 ND ND 3.7 5.6 ND ND 1.1 7.8ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDMW-10D41-42MW-204S8-18MW-204D40-50YESunknownMW-5DFORMER SEPTIC AND LEACHING FIELD AREAONSITEADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 5 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.GW-CGW-B11/15/13 11/20/14 6/9/16 11/20/00 11/15/13 11/21/14 11/15/13 6/9/16 6/22/17 11/20/00YESND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND 1.8 ND ND ND ND ND ND1.6ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1.6 ND 1.3 2.8 1.9 ND ND ND 1.5 NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND 1.8 2.4 ND 2.2 ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND3.9 3.4 3.9 5.2 41 29 36 8.8 7.8 4.068 66 58 37350 340 320 90 9938ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND25.5-35.5MW -205S8-18YESMW-200OFFSITEACROSS PINK ROWADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 6 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.GW-EMW-205D and MW-205D withDilution GW-D11/20/00 11/15/13 11/21/14 11/15/13 11/21/14 6/22/17 11/15/13 11/21/14 11/20/000YESND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND 3.7 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND 1.1 / ND ND ND NDND 1.2 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND NDND6.5ND ND ND11 / NDND ND NDND 31 ND ND ND 22 / ND ND ND NDND72ND33ND39 / NDND ND NDND 31 ND ND ND 36 / ND ND ND NDND 1.0 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND NDND 12 ND ND ND 5.7 / ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND6.622098 110240 240 / NDND ND ND110 1,800 5,100 3,500 9,800 9,500 / 15,0003.1 4.3 NDND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND 2.3 / ND ND ND ND52-62MW-205D MW-20135-45ACROSS PINK ROWOFFSITEADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 7 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.MW-201 DugMW-202R (RE1)unknown 39-5911/15/13 11/15/13 6/10/16 6/23/17 11/15/13 6/23/17 11/15/13YESND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND 6.2 2.6 5.9ND ND1.6 1.3 15 4.5 14ND ND 1.5 1.5 15 7.0 13ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND 1.1 1.2 9.2 2.5 8.4ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND 1.0 3.9 4.1 33 24 30ND 19 71 88400 280 390ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDMW-202R(BRX)39-59MW-202PZ28-38ACROSS PINK ROWOFFSITEADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 8 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.RW-301 RW-302 RW-303S RW-304 RW-303D MW-311 MW-312COMP1-4S+DCOMP1-4S8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17YES YES YES YESYESYES N/A N/AND / ND ND / ND ND ND81/ NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND 3.4 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND 1.9 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND6.6 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND 6.6 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND13 / NDNDND ND ND / ND2.6 / 2.5 ND / ND 2.5 ND 27 / NDNDND ND1.8 / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDNDND ND ND / ND2.7 / 2.4 1.2 / ND ND ND 1.2 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND2.6 / NDNDND NDND / ND2.8 / 2.5 41 / 37 7.0 ND 120 / 100NDND21 17 / 15ND / ND ND / ND120791,900 / 16,00085ND1,300 530 / 440ND / ND ND / ND ND 10 150 / NDNDNDND 13 / NDND / NDND / NDND ND 3.9 / NDNDNDNDND / NDONSITEFORMER SEPTIC AND LEACHING FIELD AREAADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 9 of 9 APPENDIX 4 HISTORICAL RECORDS Property Card: 42 PINK ROW Town of Montville, CT Location:42 PINK ROW Property Use:Industrial Primary Use:Light Industrial Unique ID:G0366700 Map Block Lot:074-038-000 Acres:10.64 Zone:R20-M Volume / Page:0610/0361 Sale Date:10/29/2015 Sale Price:$0 Parcel Information Appraised Value Assessed Value Land 338200 236740 Buildings 947154 663010 Detached Outbuildings 57350 40140 Total 1342704 939890 Value Information Owner's Information Owner's Data FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS INC PO BOX 983 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Building 1 Category: Stories: GLA: Year Built: Commercial 5.00 56935 1900 Siding: Fuel: Heating: Fireplace: Brick/Masonry Natural Gas Hot Air No Duct 0 Total Rooms: Beds/Units: Baths: 0 0 0 Class: Use: Construction Style: Wood Frame Light Industrial Light Industrial Cooling Percent: Floors: Roof Material: Partial Concrete Tar and Gravel Half Baths: Basement Garage: Finished Basement: 0 0 0 Page 1 of 2 www.cai-tech.com Data shown on this report is provided for planning and informational purposes only. The municipality and CAI Technologies are not responsible for any use for other purposes or misuse or misrepresentation of this report. Property Information - Montville, CT2/4/2019 Building 2 Category: Stories: GLA: Year Built: Commercial 2.00 3760 1900 Siding: Fuel: Heating: Fireplace: Brick/Masonry Natural Gas Forced Hot Air 0 Total Rooms: Beds/Units: Baths: 0 0 0 Class: Use: Construction Style: Masonry Office Warehouse Office Warehouse Cooling Percent: Floors: Roof Material: Central Carpet Asphalt Half Baths: Basement Garage: Finished Basement: 0 0 0 Page 2 of 2 www.cai-tech.com Data shown on this report is provided for planning and informational purposes only. The municipality and CAI Technologies are not responsible for any use for other purposes or misuse or misrepresentation of this report. Property Information - Montville, CT2/4/2019 2/4/2019 PropertyRecordCards.Com http://www.propertyrecordcards.com/PrintPage.aspx?towncode=086&uniqueid=G0366700 1/4 The Assessor’s of ce is responsible for the maintenance of records on the ownership of properties. Assessments are computed at 70% of the estimated market value of real property at the time of the last revaluation which was 2016. Information on the Property Records for the Municipality of Montville was last updated on 2/2/2019. Parcel InformationParcel Information Location:42 PINK ROW Property Use:Industrial Primary Use:Light Industrial Unique ID:G0366700 Map Block Lot:074/038/000 Acres:10.64 490 Acres:0.00 Zone:R20-M Volume / Page:0610/0361 Developers Map / Lot:2525 Census:695100 Value InformationValue Information Appraised ValueAppraised Value Assessed ValueAssessed Value Land 338,200 236,740 Buildings 947,154 663,010 Detached Outbuildings 57,350 40,140 Total 1,342,704 939,890 Owner's InformationOwner's Information Owner's DataOwner's Data FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS INC PO BOX 983 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Building 1Building 1 2/4/2019 PropertyRecordCards.Com http://www.propertyrecordcards.com/PrintPage.aspx?towncode=086&uniqueid=G0366700 2/4 Category:Industrial Use:Light Industrial GLA:56,935 Stories:5.00 Construction:Wood Frame Year Built:1900 Heating:Hot Air No Duct Fuel:Natural Gas Cooling Percent:0 Siding:Brick/Masonry Roof Material:Tar and Gravel Beds/Units:0 Special FeaturesSpecial Features Comm Pass Elev 3 Wet Sprinklers 56935 Attached ComponentsAttached Components Type:Type:Year Built:Year Built:Area:Area: Un nished Area 1900 2,902 Un nished Area 1900 5,124 Category:Industrial Use:Of ce Warehouse GLA:3,760 Stories:2.00 Construction:Masonry Year Built:1900 Heating:Forced Hot Air Fuel:Natural Gas Cooling Percent:100 Siding:Brick/Masonry Roof Material:Asphalt Beds/Units:0 Special FeaturesSpecial Features Wet Sprinklers 3760 Attached ComponentsAttached Components Building 2Building 2 2/4/2019 PropertyRecordCards.Com http://www.propertyrecordcards.com/PrintPage.aspx?towncode=086&uniqueid=G0366700 3/4 Detached OutbuildingsDetached Outbuildings Type:Type:Year Built:Year Built:Length:Length:Width:Width:Area:Area: Lights in W/PL 1961 6.00 0.00 6 Paving 1960 60,000.00 0.00 60,000 Shed w Loft 1900 1,080.00 0.00 1,080 Shed w Loft 1960 256.00 0.00 256 Owner History - SalesOwner History - Sales Owner NameOwner Name VolumeVolume PagePage Sale DateSale Date Deed TypeDeed Type Valid SaleValid Sale Sale PriceSale Price FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS INC 0610 0361 10/29/2015 Warranty Deed No $0 THOMAS G FARIA CORP 0540 0156 08/14/2009 Quit Claim No $0 GOTTESDIENER MARTIN TRUSTEE 0143 0206 09/05/1980 No $0 Building PermitsBuilding Permits Permit NumberPermit Number Permit TypePermit Type Date OpenedDate Opened Date ClosedDate Closed Permit StatusPermit Status ReasonReason P2016-0041 Plumbing 04/05/2016 Permit Issued CA-REPL BILDING SPRINKLERS WITH NEW PIPING E2015-0139 Electrical 06/04/2015 Permit Issued ELECTRICAL FOR WEIGH STATION M2015-0073 Heating 05/29/2015 Permit Issued CA ISSUED-REPLACE A/C UNIT B2015-0183 Miscellaneous 05/26/2015 Permit Issued FOOTINGS & INSTALL OF WEIGH STATION B2015-0186 Miscellaneous 05/26/2015 Permit Issued TEMP CONST TRLR E2014-0215 Electrical 08/28/2014 Permit Issued CA ISSUED-TRANSFORMER P2012-0113 Plumbing 11/26/2012 Permit Issued PIPING FOR BOILER M2008-0173 Heating 10/07/2008 Permit Issued GAS HEAT INSTALLATION E2006-0049 Electrical 04/05/2006 Permit Issued INSTALL NEW 480/277 VOLT, 1200 AMP UNDERGROUND SERVICE 2/4/2019 PropertyRecordCards.Com http://www.propertyrecordcards.com/PrintPage.aspx?towncode=086&uniqueid=G0366700 4/4 Permit NumberPermit Number Permit TypePermit Type Date OpenedDate Opened Date ClosedDate Closed Permit StatusPermit Status ReasonReason B2004-0510 Roof 08/19/2004 Permit Issued REPLACE ROOF SHINGELS ON WAREHOUSE B2004-0212 HVAC 05/06/2004 Permit Issued B2004-0161 Roof 04/26/2004 Permit Issued M2003-0061 Air Conditioning 05/27/2003 Permit Issued INSTALL AC UNIT W/PROPANE HEATING SECTION B2003-0099 Roof 04/16/2003 Permit Issued REPLACE ROOF ON WAREHOUSE Information Published With Permission From The Assessor Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Farria Beede 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 October 05, 2018 5445063.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 1945 1924 10/05/18 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike Farria Beede Down To Earth, LLC 122 Church Street Uncasville, CT 06382 5445063.3 NAUGATUCK, CT 06770 Tim Carr The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Down To Earth, LLC were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 06A9-4B90-8C64 Dakota 2 Maps Provided: Farria Beede Certification #: 06A9-4B90-8C64 Down To Earth, LLC (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5445063 3 2 page- Sanborn Sheet Key This Certified Sanborn Map Report is based upon the following Sanborn Fire Insurance map sheets. 1945 Source Sheets 1945 Volume 1, Sheet 5 1945 Volume 1, Sheet 5 1924 Source Sheets 1924 Volume 1, Sheet 5 5445063 3 3 This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection.0 Feet 150 300 600 - page Certified Sanborn® Map 06A9-4B90-8C6406A9-4B90-8C64 1945 1945 Order Date:10/05/2018 Certification # Site Name: Address: Farria Beede 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike City, ST, ZIP:Uncasville, CT 06382 EDR Inquiry:5445063.3 Client:Down To Earth, LLC Copyright Volume 1, Sheet 5 Volume 1, Sheet 5 5445063 3 4 This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection.0 Feet 150 300 600 - page Certified Sanborn® Map 06A9-4B90-8C6406A9-4B90-8C64 1924 1924 Order Date:10/05/2018 Certification # Site Name: Address: Farria Beede 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike City, ST, ZIP:Uncasville, CT 06382 EDR Inquiry:5445063.3 Client:Down To Earth, LLC Copyright Volume 1, Sheet 5 5445063 3 5 Farria Beede 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 Inquiry Number: 5445063.5 October 09, 2018 The EDR-City Directory Image Report 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2014 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 2010 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 2005 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 2000 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 1995 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 1992 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 1987 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 1982 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 1977 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 1971 þ ¨Price & Lee's City Directory 1966 þ ¨Price and Lee Co 5445063-5 Page 1 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 Year CD Image Source NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE 2014 pg A1 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg A2 EDR Digital Archive 2005 pg A3 EDR Digital Archive 2000 pg A4 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg A5 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg A6 EDR Digital Archive 1987 pg A7 EDR Digital Archive 1982 pg A8 EDR Digital Archive 1977 pg A9 EDR Digital Archive 1971 pg A10 Price & Lee's City Directory NORWICH-NEW LONDON TPKE 1966 pg A11 Price and Lee Co 5445063-5 Page 2 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS No Cross Streets Identified 5445063-5 Page 3 City Directory Images - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE EDR Digital Archive 5445063.5 Page: A1 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 289 YOUTH SERVICES HIRE A TEEN 310 MONTVILLE CITY OF MONTVILLE TOWN OF 315 BEST NAIL SALON VANNESS, LEAH 325 FRIENDLY PIZZA 480 CABRAL, JOHN J K N K LAWN CARE LLC 491 ATKINSON, JAY H 500 LINDA, JOSHUA P 507 CAREY, EDWARD J OUELLETTE, NORMAN S 509 BAKER, MICHELLE L BETTERS, WILLIAM FRIEDRICH, ARTHUR G IVEY, DANNIELLE SUTTON, J 511 CORREDOR, ALEJANDRO LADD, SHARON K LEWIS, ROBERT W SAMPSON, DEBOROAH A 534 WRONOWSKI, MARILYN J - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE EDR Digital Archive 5445063.5 Page: A2 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 289 YOUTH SERVICES HIRE A TEEN 303 STANLEY, S J 310 MONTVILLE CITY OF MONTVILLE TOWN OF 315 BEST NAIL SALON OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 325 FRIENDLY PIZZA 480 HULS, ROBERT C JOHNSON, JOY S K N K LAWN CARE LLC ZUCKERMAN, CAROL S 491 ATKINSON, JAY H 500 LINDA, RAYMOND M 507 MORSE, LAURIE OUELLETTE, NORMAN S 509 BETTERS, WILLIAM BUNN, M FRIEDRICH, ARTHUR G SUTTON, J THOMAS, E TORRES, ERNESTO 511 CORREDOR, ALEJANDRO LEWIS, ROBERT W SAMPSON, DEBOROAH STEFANSKI, JEFFERY WOODWARD, LANCE A - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE EDR Digital Archive 5445063.5 Page: A3 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 274 NEW LONDON KOREAN UNITED 289 YOUTH SERVICES HIRE A TEEN 307 TINT MY RIDE LLC 310 MONTVILLE CITY OF MONTVILLE TOWN OF 325 FRIENDLY PIZZA 326 BAUR, WILLIAM 480 HULS, ROBERT C JOHNSON, JOY S ZUCKERMAN, JOSHUA A 491 ATKINSON, JAY H 500 LINDA, RAYMOND M 507 CONARY, LYNN MORSE, LAURIE THIVIERGE, KENNETH 509 BRYANT, RICHARD FRIEDRICH, ARTHUR G HOFFMAN, ALLISON M IVEY, DANNIELLE LETOURNEAU, BARBARA E THOMAS, E 511 ADAMS, SEAN FERGUSON, THERESA A LEWIS, ROBERT RICE, MICHAEL T WOODWARD, LANCE - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE EDR Digital Archive 5445063.5 Page: A4 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 303 OMNI HOME HEALTH SERVICES 309 ATTINELLO, ALICIA M 310 MONTVILLE TOWN OF 325 FRIENDLY PIZZA 480 MONTVILLE HEALTH CENTER PC ZUCKERMAN, C S 486 WILSON, SILAS E 491 ATKINSON, JAY H 500 LINDA, RAYMOND 505 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 507 NIELSON, PAMELA J 509 ATKINSON, STEVEN P CHAPMAN, SHAWN FRIEDRICH, ARTHUR G LEANDRI, A 511 GUILMET, DORIS LEWIS, ROBERT - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE EDR Digital Archive 5445063.5 Page: A5 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 303 PARE ENGINEERING CORPORATION 309 W & B KEENEY INC 310 MONTVILLE TOWN OF 313 ESQUIRE BARBER SHOP 314 MONTVILLE VISITING NURSES ASSN 325 FRIENDLY PIZZA 480 MONTVILLE HEALTH CENTER PC - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE EDR Digital Archive 5445063.5 Page: A6 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 300 UNCASVILLE SCHOOL 303 LAW ENFORCEMENT COUNCIL PARE ENGINEERING CORPORATION 307 JO JOS ICE CREAM CO 310 MONTVILLE TOWN OF 313 ESQUIRE BARBER SHOP 314 MONTVILLE VISITING NURSES ASSN 325 FRIENDLY PIZZA 480 MONTVILLE HEALTH CENTER PC - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE EDR Digital Archive 5445063.5 Page: A7 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1987 300 UNCASVILLE SCHOOL 325 FRIENDLY PIZZA 480 MONTVILLE HEALTH CENTER 517 PRASAD MOTURI B MD - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE EDR Digital Archive 5445063.5 Page: A8 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1982 300 UNCASVILLE SCHOOL 325 FRIENDLY PIZZA - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE EDR Digital Archive 5445063.5 Page: A9 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1977 310 MONTVILLE TOWN OF - NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE Price & Lee's City Directory 5445063.5 Page: A10 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1971 - NORWICH-NEW LONDON TPKE Price and Lee Co 5445063.5 Page: A11 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1966 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 September 14, 2016 4726036.9 Contact:EDR Inquiry # Search Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Year Details SourceScale EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Site Name: Client Name: 2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2010 1"=500'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2008 1"=500'Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP 2006 1"=500'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP 2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 1996 1"=500'Flight Date: April 15, 1996 Magic 1991 1"=500'Acquisition Date: April 12, 1991 USGS/DOQQ 1990 1"=500'Flight Date: March 26, 1990 MAGIC 1974 1"=500'Flight Date: February 24, 1974 USGS 1970 1"=500'Flight Date: March 01, 1970 USGS 1957 1"=500'Flight Date: April 10, 1957 USGS 1951 1"=500'Flight Date: November 21, 1951 CTMAGIC 1934 1"=500'Flight Date: April 09, 1934 FAIR 09/14/16 Faria Beede Nobis Engineering, Inc. 42 Pink Row 585 MIddlesex St UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Lowell, MA 01851 4726036.9 Alyssa Epstein This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 4726036 9 2 4726036.9 2012 = 500' 4726036.9 2010 = 500' 4726036.9 2008 = 500' 4726036.9 2006 = 500' 4726036.9 2005 = 500' 4726036.9 1996 = 500' 4726036.9 1991 = 500' 4726036.9 1990 = 500' 4726036.9 1974 = 500' 4726036.9 1970 = 500' 4726036.9 1957 = 500' 4726036.9 1951 = 500' 4726036.9 1934 = 500' EDR Historical Topo Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com with QuadMatch™ Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 September 13, 2016 4726036.4 EDR Historical Topo Map Report EDR Inquiry # Search Results: P.O.# Project: Maps Provided: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Zone: UTM X Meters: UTM Y Meters: Elevation: Contact: Site Name: Client Name: 2012 1983, 1984 1970 1958 1949, 1952 1939, 1941 1921 1893 1892 09/13/16 Faria Beede Nobis Engineering, Inc. 42 Pink Row 585 MIddlesex St UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Lowell, MA 01851 4726036.4 Alyssa Epstein EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Nobis Engineering, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. 91730.01 41.436514 41° 26' 11" North Phase I ESA -72.107411 -72° 6' 27" West Zone 18 North 741672.04 4591255.14 39.73' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 4726036 4 2 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 2012 Source Sheets 2012 Palmertown 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Uncasville 7.5-minute, 24000 1983, 1984 Source Sheets 1983 Montville 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1980 Edited 1983 1984 Uncasville 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1980 Edited 1983 1970 Source Sheets 1970 Montville 7.5-minute, 24000 Photo Revised 1970 Aerial Photo Revised 1970 1970 Uncasville 7.5-minute, 24000 Photo Revised 1970 Aerial Photo Revised 1970 1958 Source Sheets 1958 Montville 7.5-minute, 24000 1958 Uncasville 7.5-minute, 24000 Edited 1958 4726036 4 4 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1949, 1952 Source Sheets 1949 Montville 7.5-minute, 31680 Edited 1949 1952 Uncasville 7.5-minute, 31680 Edited 1949 1939, 1941 Source Sheets 1939 Montville 7.5-minute, 31680 1941 Uncasville 7.5-minute, 31680 1921 Source Sheets 1921 New London 15-minute, 62500 1893 Source Sheets 1893 New London 15-minute, 62500 4726036 4 5 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1892 Source Sheets 1892 New London 15-minute, 62500 4726036 4 6 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Nobis Engineering, Inc. TP, Uncasville, 2012, 7.5-minute W, Palmertown, 2012, 7.5-minute 4726036 4 7 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1983, 1984 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Nobis Engineering, Inc. TP, Uncasville, 1984, 7.5-minute W, Montville, 1983, 7.5-minute 4726036 4 8 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1970 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Nobis Engineering, Inc. TP, Uncasville, 1970, 7.5-minute W, Montville, 1970, 7.5-minute 4726036 4 9 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1958 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Nobis Engineering, Inc. TP, Uncasville, 1958, 7.5-minute W, Montville, 1958, 7.5-minute 4726036 4 10 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1949, 1952 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Nobis Engineering, Inc. TP, Uncasville, 1952, 7.5-minute W, Montville, 1949, 7.5-minute 4726036 4 11 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1939, 1941 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Nobis Engineering, Inc. TP, Uncasville, 1941, 7.5-minute W, Montville, 1939, 7.5-minute 4726036 4 12 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1921 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Nobis Engineering, Inc. TP, New London, 1921, 15-minute 4726036 4 13 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1893 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Nobis Engineering, Inc. TP, New London, 1893, 15-minute 4726036 4 14 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1892 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Faria Beede 42 Pink Row UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Nobis Engineering, Inc. TP, New London, 1892, 15-minute 4726036 4 15 APPENDIX 5 STATE AND MUNICIPAL RECORDS 1 DEEP & EPA’s COMMENTS on the REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN and RCRA CORRECTION MEASURES STUDY ADDENDUM, REVISED MAY 2017 PIT STOP HOLDINGS, LLC (dba FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS, INC.) 42 PINK ROW C/O 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TURNPIKE UNCASVILLE, CT February 8, 2018 Thank you for providing the Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, revised October 2017 (referred to herein as the “RAP”). The RAP was prepared by Advanced Environmental Interface Inc. (AEI) for Pit Stop Holdings, LLC (dba Faria Beede Instruments, Inc.), referred to herein as “Faria,” 42 Pink Row, c/o 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Uncasville, CT. This letter provides comments based on review of the RAP by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Along with responding to the comments below, please also provide an updated schedule that includes the implementation of the various aspects of the RAP including the following: 1. Start-up and O&M for the expanding groundwater pump and treat system 2. Submittal of Revised Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) 3. Proposed soil vapor sampling at residential properties 4. Sampling/remediation of Interior Courtyard lead exceedances 5. Long-term stewardship permit application 6. ELUR application 7. Groundwater monitoring, O&M and Annual reporting DEEP’s and EPA’s comments are as follows: General Comments Response to General Comment 1: CT DEEP had requested the following in General Comment 1 of its October 11, 2017 letter: “As part of revising the RAP to address these comments, please include a separate Response to Comments document that provides Faria’s specific responses to DEEP’s/EPA’s comments. The Response to Comments document should include responses to each of the comments provided by DEEP and EPA in this letter and those attached to DEEP’s March 17, 2017 letter.” Faria's October 30, 2017 letter responds to CT DEEP’s October 17, 2017 comments, but does not include responses to those transmitted as part of CT DEEP’s March 17, 2017 letter. Please revise the October 30, 2017 letter to include responses to CT DEEP’s March 17, 2017 comments, revise the RAP if necessary, and specify where in the RAP the comments are addressed. Response to Specific Comment 17: CT DEEP had requested “a technical justification supporting the current monitoring plan and well network based on its adequacy for evaluating groundwater capture and risk to downgradient receptors in light of changes to the plume since the 2012 2 CMIP.” This was not provided in the response to Specific Comment 17, nor in the Groundwater Monitoring Plan in Appendix 19. The Groundwater Monitoring Plan in Appendix 19 should be explicitly supported by the site conceptual model and current site conditions. While the RAP includes a discussion of the site conceptual model in Appendix 12, the RAP does not explicitly use this information to support the monitoring plan and to identify any potential monitoring gaps. As part of an adequately justified monitoring plan, the wells selected for evaluation of compliance with SWPC and RVC should be supported based on the conceptual site model and location of potential receptors and transport pathways, including vertical gradients, should be discussed in the context of the selection of these wells so that any potential pathways and receptors not adequately monitored can be identified. In addition, recent increases in the concentration of chlorinated solvents in deep overburden groundwater should be considered and discussed in the selection of monitoring points and frequency. This justification should also clearly articulate how the monitoring network will be used to evaluate the adequacy of plume capture by the groundwater recovery system and how this evaluation and any necessary actions to achieve capture will be communicated in annual monitoring reports. For the discussion on how adequacy of plume capture will be evaluated, CT DEEP and EPA recommend that Faria consider approaches set out in AECOM’s August 31 letter Regarding: Response to USEPA Comments on the CMI Plan, dated February 2012. Response to Specific Comment 19: The response proposes adding SMW-5 (shallow overburden) and SMW-9 (deep overburden) wells to the monitoring network if available and accessible and evaluating vertical gradients at MW-202R (bedrock) and MW-202PZ (shallow overburden). Consideration could also be given to including monitoring of existing off-site well MW-203D in addition to well clusters located closer to the elevated off-site deep overburden and bedrock concentrations. Regardless of the location proposed, the response and RAP should propose and justify locations for monitoring groundwater quality, and vertical and horizontal gradients based on a site conceptual model considering hydrogeology, contaminant distribution and trends, as well as current or potential surface water or vapor intrusion receptors. While evaluating vertical gradients at the MW-202 cluster should provide some information that will help understand the fate and transport of the PCE exceedances in deep overburden and bedrock, the sufficiency of this one location as a data point for assessing off-site vertical gradients should be evaluated in the context of the site conceptual model. In addition, while it is worth evaluating potential for sampling at existing off-site wells from a cost saving perspective, this proposal should be justified based on the site conceptual model as well as any known construction details for these wells. Response to Specific Comment 20: The initial comment generally requested that the RAP explain how the effect of the groundwater pump and treat system operation on VOC bedrock groundwater concentrations, further migration of VOCs in/from bedrock groundwater, and vertical gradients between bedrock, deep, and shallow overburden groundwater will be monitored and cited that no monitoring or gauging is proposed at any monitoring wells downgradient of MW-202R, where RVC exceedances are observed in bedrock, nor at any other bedrock wells across the site. The response does not fully address these concerns. Please respond to the original comment in the context of the site conceptual model (as requested for Responses to Comment 17 and 19, above). 3 Comments on the RAP 1. Section 2.4, page 6 of the RAP states, “Currently there are no residences in the area that use water supply wells.” This statement is misleading without details on what “the area” consists of. Faria should provide an updated well water receptor survey map that shows the parcels to the north, east, and south of the facility that clearly identifies which properties have been connected to public water and which properties utilize on-site drinking water wells. In addition, the RAP should include a discussion on the need to conduct any future monitoring of nearby drinking water wells to ensure that the groundwater plume emanating from the Faria facility does not adversely impact drinking water quality at these locations and to further support Faria’s Conceptual Site Model. 2. Section 2.5.1, page 8 of the RAP states, in reference to tetrachloroethene (PCE) concentrations on or emanating from Faria: “The highest offsite concentration currently, 15,000 µg/L, was collected from the deep overburden well, MW-205D.” The RAP notes in subsequent sections that this sample was collected in June 2017 and also reports a 16,000 µg/L PCE concentration detected in August 2017 at RW 303D. Please revise the RAP to include further discussion regarding: possible hypotheses that would account for this order-of-magnitude increase in PCE groundwater concentrations relative to recent on and off-site concentrations; an updated discussion regarding potential for DNAPL in consideration of these concentrations; and steps to investigate and monitor these concentration increases including consideration of more frequent groundwater quality monitoring. 3. Section 3.1, page 11 of the RAP includes a table showing the changes in the proposed remedy for each area of concern from the 2010 CMS and the latest revision of Faria’s RAP include a 3” asphalt cap and ELUR to address arsenic exceedances in soil above the residential direct exposure criteria. Section 3.2.2, page 17 describes remedial excavations of impacted soils in this area in 2016 and goes on to state “Confirmatory soil sample testing results indicate that all associated RSR criteria were met.” Footnote #14 further indicates “As noted above, with remedial excavations completed in Area 3 and a ground water reclassification from GA to GB, the requests for an EC should be rescinded.” Please revise the table in Section 3.1 to clearly indicate whether an EC is proposed for this area. If it has been determined that an EC is no longer needed, the table should be clear to indicate that the asphalt cap is only needed for rendering the soils inaccessible under the RSRs and the updated RAP should clearly explain this change. 4. Section 3.1, Footnote 10 on Page 12 states: “RVC exceedances were only noted in deep overburden groundwater, greater than 15 ft. bg, where RVC criteria do not apply. Groundwater from sentinel monitoring wells (e.g., upgradient of the nearest surface water body (Thames River)) are compliant with the SWP.” Please revise this footnote, Footnote 12 on Page 13, Section 3.3.1 on Page 20 and other parts of the RAP as appropriate to consider Comments 7 from CT DEEP’s March 17, 2017 letter as well as an understanding of the transport potential of upgradient and/or deeper concentrations exceeding Volatilization Criteria and Surface Water Protection Criteria per Specific Comments 19 and 20 from CT DEEP’s October 11, 2017 comments. 4 5. Section 3.2.1, Page 15 states: “Indoor air samples will be collected after Faria removes their equipment and the area is power-washed clean and before residential occupants enter the building.” Please provide a plan for performing this initial indoor air sampling. In the schedule in Section 4.0, please include a plan for regular indoor air monitoring, until compliance with the Residential Volatilization Criteria is achieved, to ensure that residents of the facility are not exposed to VOCs entering the building via vapor intrusion. 6. Section 3.3.5, Page 24 states: “The CTDEEP Water Supply Well Receptor Survey Guidance Document (January 2015) was used to calculate the capture zone of potable wells potential operating within 500 feet.” Please revise the RAP to provide these calculations. 7. Table 1A identifies SB-335 as having PAHs exceeding GB Pollutant Mobility Criteria (PMC). Please revise the RAP to include the approach for achieving compliance with Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations with respect to this exceedance. 8. Appendix 17, Section 2.2 states that “in-situ soil vapor and soil vapor from the residential off-site SSDSs will be collected using Suma Canisters and analyzed by a State approved laboratory for VOCs via EPA Method TO-15.” For the in-situ soil vapor samples, please be aware that the EPA OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air (https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/oswer-vapor-intrusion-technical-guide-final.pdf ) recommends that soil vapor samples collected for purposes of evaluating vapor intrusion be collected directly beneath the building structure in the coarsest, driest material in the vadose zone. In homogeneous soil, when the vapor source is beneath the building, soil gas concentrations tend to be greater beneath the building than at the same depth in adjacent open areas, even if the source is laterally extensive relative to the building footprint. Based on this information, soil gas samples collected outside of the building footprint would not be expected to accurately estimate sub-slab and hence indoor air concentrations. 9. Appendix 19, Section 1.0 states: “Groundwater sampling and gauging was performed last in June 2016.” It is important that the groundwater monitoring plan reflect all site data, particularly given the sharp increases in deep overburden concentrations observed in 2017. Please revise Appendix 19 to consider all groundwater data collected to date. 10. Appendix 19, Section 1.0 presents a list of Contaminants of Concern (COCs) in groundwater. However, the plan does not specify what the analytical parameters will be for groundwater samples collected as part of the monitoring plan. This information should be added to Appendix 19 and specified in the QAPP. The parameter list should include full suites of parameters for each contaminant class of concern plus 1,4-dioxane as specified in the 2006 QAPP Addendum prepared by ENSR for Faria, unless there is a well-supported justification provided for eliminating individual constituents. \ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION 79 Elm Street ° Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Fred Merritt, CEO Faria Beede Instruments, Inc. c/o Riverside Mfg., LLC14510 Lima Road Fort Wayne, IN 46818 DISAPPROVAL ALI ÿJATER MAIÿAGEMÿCT ]ÿE:Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum (October 2016) Faria Beede Instruments, Inc. 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Uncasville (Montville) Dear Mr. Men'itt: The Remediation Division of the Bureau of Water Protection and Land Reuse (DEEP), along with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 1, have reviewed the report titled, Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, dated June 2016 (Revised October 2016). The report was received by DEEP on November 2, 2016, mad was prepared by A1 Kovalik of Advanced Environmental Interface, Inc. on behalf of Faria Beede Instruments, Inc. (Faria Beede). The October 2016 Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was prepared in accordance with Faria Beede's obligations under Section 22a-449(c)-105(h) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies (referred to as voluntal2¢ RCRA Corrective Action), as well as Section. 22a-134a of the Connecticut General Statutes (CGS) (CT's Transfer Act). The RAP proposes to remediate soil, soil vapor and groundwater at the site through soil excavation and off-site disposal, use of engineered controls, installation of a soil vapor extraction system, and institutional controls. The above referenced report is hereby disapproved. The October 2016 RAP is disapproved because it proposes to shut down the existinggroundwater pump and treat system without providing sufficient rationale for preventingpotential health risks associated with the polluted groundwater on and emanating from the Faria Beede site. Specifically, the RAP does not adequately address potential soil vapor concerns at nearby residential properties once the pump and treat system is shut off. It also fails to identifythe manner in which Faria Beede will demonstrate compliance with the regulatory requirementsregarding the off-site migration of polluted groundwater from the site. DEEP and EPA have been working closely with Faria Beede and Mr. Kovalik, since 2013, to provide guidance and input on ÿm'jous. p, roposals to pro!qerly remediateÿthe.Faria Beede site.. ' . ,. ;ÿ Faria Beede Instruments, Inc. Page 2 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Montville Faria Beede has failed to develop an adequate understanding of the fate and transport of the groundwater plume on and emanating fi'om its site in the absence of full plume containment. The hydrogeologic setting is complex, the size of the affected area is large, and there are nearby residents and aquatic receptors. Given the amount of time that has transpired, since EPA's approval of the 2009 CMS/RAP, and the multiple revised RAPs and proposals that have been submitted since 2010, none of which are adequate to address risks and meet Remediation Standard Regulations, DEEP and EPA are directing Faria Beede to implement the groundwater pump and treat system expansion as approved in the 2009 CMS/RAP. Within 30 days from the date of this letter, please submit the following to DEEP and EPA for review and approval: 1. Schedule and Implementation Plan for the Expansion of the Groundwater Pump & Treat System 2. Revised Groundwater Monitoring Plan 3. Sub-slab Depressurization System Operation & Maintenance Plan Attached (Attaelmaent A) are specific written comments for the disapproval, based on DEEP's and EPA's review of the RAP. In addition to the plans requested above, please submit a revised RAP within 60 days from the date of this letter that addresses the comments attached. If you have o_n_y questions pertaining to tbAs matter, please contact Drew Ku_kueka of my staff at 860-418-5955 or via email at drew.kukucka@ct.gov. Slncereÿ,ÿiS Paÿlck F. Bowe Director Remediation Division Bureau of Water Protection and Land Reuse PFB:ÿ( Enclosure Copy:Fred Melxitt, Pitstup Holdings, LLC, c/o Riverside Mfg., LLC, 14510 Lima Rd., Fort Wayne, IN, 46818A1 Kovalik, PE, LEP, AEI, Inc., 8 Old Indian Trail, Middlefield, CT 06455 Stephanie Can', EPA Region 1BiI1 Warzecha, DEEP Remediation Drew Kukucka, DEEP Remediation Stacy Pappano, DEEP Land and Water Resources Graham Stevens, DEEP Constituent Affairs Land ManagementTim Sullivan, DECD Sent Cert'Wled Mail Return Receipt Requested 79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106-5127 Connecticut Department of ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ................... ÿ - ---..-., __ÿ, www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer ATTACHMENT A Faria Beede Instruments, Inc. 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Uneasville 0Montville) March 17, 2017 DEEP's and EPA's Comments for Disapproval of Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum. These comments accompany DEEP's disapproval, dated Mm'ch 17, 2017 for the October 2016 Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, submitted by A1 Kovalik, LEP, of Advanced Environmental Interface, Inc. on behalf of Faria Beede Instruments, Inc. (Faria Beede). DEEP, along with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 1, have reviewed the October 2016 RAP and have significant concerns regarding Faria Beede's proposal to shut down the groundwater pump and treat system. Faria Beede's RAP does not provide adequate measures to address groundwater pollution on and emanating from the site. Given the extent and degree of the groundwater contamination on- and off-site and the limited off-site characterization of these conditions, DEEP and EPA have concerns that not remediating tile source area o1" fÿly containing and treating the groundwater plume on-site will continue to result in increasing concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) off-site. As noted in Comment No. 11 below, VOC concentrations in off-site groundwater have already substantially increased in recent years. This is likely due to the documented inadequacy of the existing pump and treat system design to fully cdntaln the plume exacerbated by the fact that "well efficiency is getting noticeably reduced", as noted in the Jan - Dec 2014 Annual Status Report. Such conditions could pose a risk of vapor intrusion to nearby residents and create potential for impact to downgradient surface water receptors. Furthermore, the RAP does not demonstrate how the groundwater plume will be remediated to achieve compliance with the Remediation Standard Regulations (RSRs), as further explained below. As you are aware, in 2010 EPA approved Faria Beede's (operating as Thomas G. Faria Corporation at that time) plan to expand the existing pump and treat system to achieve full containment of the groundwater plume migrating from its site, thereby preventing adverse impacts to downgradient receptors. By expanding the groundwater pump and treat system and achieving full containment of the un-site groundwater plume, Faria Beede's 2010 CMS/RAP allowed for limited off-site groundwater characterization and monitoring. This was based on the expectation that the source area would be contained on-site, allowing for off-site groundwater concentrations to attenuate over time. Faria Beede's proposal to shut down the pump and treat system, as presented in the October 20 t 6 RAP, does not.identify ttÿesÿ ........ significant data gaps. By " ¢, -, . Faria Beede Insh'uments, Inc. Page 2 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Montville shutting down the pump and treat system without fully characterizing and monitoring off-site impacts, there is no way for Faria Beede to identify or prevent impacts to off-site receptors, nor to demonstrate that groundwater is in compliance with the Residential Volatilization Criteria and Surface Water Protection Criteria as defined in the RSRs. Additional comments specific to Faria Beede's October 2016 RAP are as follows: .Section 2.3, p. 5 states with respect to the sub slab depressurization systems installed in residential properties along Pink Row "... none of the systems installed were required Nevertheless, Faria Beede installed the systems' with the responsibility of operation reportedly left to the individual homeowners'. " DEEP/EPA Comment: In the fore" homes in which Faria installed sub-slab depressurization systems, Faria had measured VOC concentrations for which it calculated risks in excess of the most protective end of EPA's cancer risk range (an excess life-time cancer risk of 1 in 1,000,000) based on toxicity values in use at that time. At that time, the toxicity for trichloroethylene was in the process of being re-evaluated, and has since been found to be more toxic than previously thought (resulting in EPA changing the inhalation reference concentration). Therefore, EPA gave Faria Beede the option of performing additional study on the seasonal variation in vapor intrusion, exposares and risks at the homes or installing the sub slab depressmÿization systems to reduce exposure. Faria Beede chose to install the sub slab systems. Faria Beede's indoor air sampling in the five homes on Pink Row was performed with Faria Beede's groundwater recovely system in full operation. Without expanding the existing groundwater recovery system to fitly contain the VOC plume, in accordance with Faria B eede's plan approved by EPA in 2010, it is reasonable to expect that VOC-plume migration in the direction of these homes will continue to increase. In the absence of controls on the VOC plume, EPA and DEEP would expect Faria Beede to not only maintain the sub slab systems until such time it is determined there is no poteÿntial for human health risks, but also perform regular monitoring of the vapor intrusion pathway in these homes, including indoor air sampling, to further evaluate the potential risk of vapor intrusion. Results of this monitoring would need to be evaluated to determine if upgrades to the sub slab depressm'ization systems are necessary. Faria Beede should enter into a RCRA Corrective Action Long-Term Stewardship Pelrait with DEEP that incorporates the on-going oversight of the sub-slab depressurization systems. 2. Section 2.5.1, p. 7 describes the results of the MIP investigation in the former septic area (Area 6) which states that "the concentrations (of PCE) were lower beneath the silt/clay lens, with the notable exception of Mg, where elevated reading were observed all the way to the bottom of the boring, or approximately 60feet below grade ". DEEP/EPA Comment: The MIP investigation does not appear to delineate the extent of the impacts observed in M9 that extend velÿically down to the bedrock surface and Faria Beede Instruments, Inc. Page 3 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Montville laterally to the east and southeast beyond M16 (as depicted in Figures 4 & 5). By not performing the approved expansion of the pump and treat system to achieve full contaimnent of the on-site groundwater plume, Faria Beede is allowing these observed impacts to migrate further off-site. This will likely continue to result in increasing PCE concentrations off-site, potentially impacting off-site receptors. If the existing pump and treat system was not expanded, the plume would need to be fully delineated off-site in shallow and deep overburden and bedrock aquifers. .Section 2.7, p. 8 describes that, in order to collect static water levels without the influence of pumping, the ga'oundwater recovery well was shut off from Saturday, May 21 st (tooling) to Sunday, May 22nd (evening) and depth to water measurements were collected during the shut-down period. . . DEEP/EPA Comment: Appendix 12, p. 5 includes excet]?ts from the RFI (Woodurd & Curran, 2000) in which a pump test was performed. During this pump test, water levels measurements collected following shut down of the pumping system indicated it took approximately four days prior to the groundwater stabilizing. Please provide additional discussion on how Faria Beede determined that the water table had equilibrated during the period of May 21 ÿt-22na. Section 3.2.1.1, p. 11 states that the ' SVE system extracted air vacuum readings will be • l JJchecked by Faria Beede personnel and screened and/or sampled annual y . DEEP/EPA Comment: At what frequency will the readings be checked by Faria Beede personnel? How is Faria Beede planning to manage the monitoring if it is moving its operations off-site? Faria Beede should develop a plan for DEEP's approval that includes frequent system operational checks and screening early on, when VOC removal will likely be at its highest, and then propose decreasing frequency as VOC recovery diminishes over time. Section 3.2.2.1, p. 12 explains the proposed soil removal and post-excavation confirmatory sampling in Areas 1, 2, and 3. DEEP/EPA Comment: Please provide additional information, including a frgure, describing the number, locations, and depths of proposed post-excavation saaÿaples. In addition, fox" these data and any other data proposed in the RAP, please provide or reference a previously submitted Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) specifying the steps for ensuring that collected data is of a known and documented quality adequate for making final remedial decisions. The QAPP should include the following at a minimum: data quality objectives, field and laboratory quality control requirements, data verification, validation, and usability, and Standard Operating Procedures for sample collection, any proposed field screening, and sampling handling and custody requirements. The QAPP should also include, or provide a link to, the QAPP for the laboratory proposed for sample analysis. Faria Beede Instruments, Inc. Page 4 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Montville ,Section 3.2.3, p. 13 describes sediment in Oxoboxo Brook and Gairs Pond and states the VOCs, PAHs, and metals detected in sediments were either not connected to materials used at Faria Beede or at levels such that no further investigation or action was warranted. DEEP/EPA Comment: This statement does not accm'ately reflect EPA's determination based on investigation and ecological risk assessment of VOCs, PAHs, and metals detected in sediment. EPA's May 2010 Statement of Basis (attached) which proposed the site wide remedy states the following (and additional detail on the basis for this proposal can be found on p. 4 of EPA's December 16, 2008 letter to Faria Beede, wlfich provided feedback on Faria Beede's July 2008 Draft Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment (SLERA) Addendum): "In the section of Oxoboxo Brook thatpasses through the Faria facility property, the water moves' at a fast speed and the streambed consists of cobbles with minimal sand and gravel. Sediment samples showed PAHs and metals' in isolated portions of the brook in the section that passes through the facility. Oxoboxo Brook discharges to Gairs Pond, a man-made impoundment located approximately 200feet downstream of the Faria facility property. The brook then empties over an approximately 15-foot high spillway to the Thames River. Samples of surface sediment from Gaits Pond showed PAH and metal concentrations similar to'those in surface sediments from similar ponded areas upstream of Faria. Proposal: Impacted areas of the brook are limited in area and depth and consist of very little sediment. Removing any remaining sediment is' not practieal, as it would involve scraping the rocks in areas where access is very difficult, and little benefit would result. Any metals" and PAHs in the brook that originated from the Faria property were likely transported to the brook by storm water run-off from areas of the facility where cleanup is proposed Therefore, potential ongoing sources of contaminants' to the brook will be addressed with the proposed remediation. No remediation is proposed for Gairs Pond, as contaminant impacts in the pond are consistent with similar sediments upstream of Faria. However, if the Gaits Pond dam is ever removed, Faria would evaluate deeper sediments in Gaits Pond in advance of dam removal." Given the recent acquisition ofFaria Beede and its plans to transfer the facility property, EPA and CT DEEP recormnnnd that Faria Beede either perfolan this characterization of deeper sediments in Gair's Pond in the near term or enter into a Long-Term Stewardship Permit with CT DEEP encompassing this provision as well as all of the operation, maintenance, and monitoring needed for the Faria Beede site remedy. 7ÿ Section 3.3.1, p. 14 summarizes the results of on- and off-site monitoring wells in comparison to the Residential Volatilization Criteria (ResVC). The summary says that the majority of the wells that have elevated levels of PCE and/or TCE above the ResVC are screened below the water table, and concludes that the ResVC does not apply. , tlt!ÿl¢?l; DEEP/EPA Comment: First, the ResVC do apply. Only if wells are screened across the water table, representing the uppermost portion of the water column and demonstrate that there is a lens of groundwater below criteria (using the compliance monitoring provisions oftkeitÿSRs),ÿtheÿa deepel: plume can be considered to mecÿt:ResVC in,the ', ',., ,ÿ,,:,: ÿ:ÿ,: 'ÿ Faria Beede Instruments, Inc. Page 5 385 Norwich-New London Tui'npike, Montville location of such monitoring wells. Second, DEEP and EPA are concerned about the notable increasing PCE and TCE concentrations in these deeper screened wells indicating a considerable source area remains in the saturated zone beneath Area 6. Without full containment of the on-site groundwater plume, the source continues to migrate off-site further degrading groundwater quality downgradient of the site. There are very few monitoring wells located off-site. It appears that only one well is located off-site that is lmown to be screened across the water table, and therefore appropriate to use for evaluating volatilization concerns. If Faria Beede does not expand the pump and treat system as approved in Faria Beede's 2009 CMS/RAP, this source area would continue to migrate off site. Absent source removal or on-site containment, Faria Beede would need to expand its characterization and monitoring of off-site groundwater conditions between the site, the residential properties, and the surface water bodies to fully characterize and monitor the nature and extent of impacts from the Faria Beede site. This characterization will need to evaluate shallow and deep overburden and bedrock aquifer between the site and the Thames River. 8. Section 3.3.1.2, p. 14 proposes two soil vapor samples to be collected in Area 6 to• ' ÿ€ Oevaluate current conditions in soil vapor for purposes of detertmmng whether a n - build" ELUR is necessary. DEEP/EPA Comment: Given the variability of VOC concentrations in soil and groundwater in this area and given that the results will be used to assess risk to future residents, the proposed number of samples should be supparÿed by statistical analyses. Sample collection and analyses should be included in the QAPP requested above. 9. Section 3.3.2, p. 15 states "no one uses the groundwater anymore." DEEP/EPA Comment: If the pump and treat system is shut down, Faria Beede wili be required to monitor existing bedrock and overburden drinking water wells located north and south of the site, as the plume conditions change over time to provide assurances that Fm'ia Beede's groundwater plume does not impact drinking water quality in these wells. 10. Section 3.3.3, p. 15 indicates the monitoring wells that were used to evaluate compliance with the Surface Water Protection Criteria (SWPC). DEEP/EPA Comment" Similar to previous comments above, if the pump mad treat system continues to fail in containing the existing groundwater plume on-site or is turned off, Faria Beede will need to expand its existing network of monitoring wells to be able to monitor the plume as it migrates towards Gair's Pond and the Thames'River to ensure that there is no threat to aquatic life• This would require Faria Beede to develop a plan to investigate potential impacts to surface water receptors and take measures to prevent impacts to these receptors if the evaluation shows the potential for impacts. The current number of monitoring wells and locations m'e inadequate fQr tlfis evaluatio ,n .: ...... i, ,,ÿ:;ÿLi o Jÿ ÿ are iÿ:ÿ Faria Beede Inshaaments, Inc. Page 6 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Montville 11. Section 3.3.7, p. 19 states that "the primary objective in groundwater sampling is to monitor shallow groundwater conditions for potential significant changes that could require an expansion of the residential sub-slab vapor control systems currently in place . The following paragraph goes on to state that ...groundwater quality hasreached steady state." DEEP/EPA Comment: In reviewing Faria Beede's 2016 groundwater monitoring results with past results from 2013 and 2014, it is not clear why only shallow overburden wells were monitored in 2016. The 2013 and 2014 results show that the highest PCE concentrations in groundwater were detected in off-site deep overburden monitoring well MW-205D. In 2014, PCE concentrations observed in this well were five times greater than the levels observed in the 2013. Despite this sharp concentration increase and the proximity of the well to homes, it does not appear that Faria Beede has sampled this well since 2014. Other wells located on-site within AJ'ea 6 also demonstrated inereasing concentration trends. These results indicate that 1.) the plume has not reached steady state, 2.) the plume continues to migrate off-site as full containment of on-site groundwater has not been achieved, and 3.) further delineation of the source area extending off-site is warraxated if the pump and treat system is not expanded as originally proposed. Based on this, Faria Beede should implement the previously approved pump and treat system expansion and/or revise its monitoring plan accordingly. As DEEP reminded you in a June 16, 2016 letter from DEEP to Fm'ia Beede, quarterly water level gauging and groundwater quality monitoring of fifteen on- and off-site monitor wells was incorporated into Faria Beede's November 2001 Performance Monitoring Plan (PMP). The PMP stated that results of the gauging and water quality testing would be presented in annual reports and any changes to the monitoring program would be Woposed in those reports. Groundwater monitoring was not completed at the site in 2015 and only Select shallow groundwater wells were monitoring in 2016. By not completing the necessary groundwater monitoring in 2015 and 2016, without first notifying DEEP or EPA in writing, Faria violated its own approved monitoring plans identified and enforced pursuant to EPA's RCRA 3013 Order dated May 17, 1999. In addition, this lapse in groundwater monitoring further limits the ability to perfo:m the cma'ent evaluation of the groundwater plume conditions on- and off-site. DEEP and EPA requests that Faria Beede submit an updated groundwater monitoring plan that identifies the existing approved groundwater monitoring plan and includes newly installed monitoring wells. The plan should include a provision for Faria Beede to propose fÿture modifications to the monitoring plan in advance of implementing any changes to the monitoring scope or frequency. 1 DEEP & EPA’s COMMENTS on the REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN and RCRA CORRECTION MEASURES STUDY ADDENDUM, REVISED MAY 2017 PIT STOP HOLDINGS, LLC (dba FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS, INC.) 42 PINK ROW C/O 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TURNPIKE UNCASVILLE, CT February 8, 2018 Thank you for providing the Remedial Action Plan and RCRA Corrective Measures Study Addendum, revised October 2017 (referred to herein as the “RAP”). The RAP was prepared by Advanced Environmental Interface Inc. (AEI) for Pit Stop Holdings, LLC (dba Faria Beede Instruments, Inc.), referred to herein as “Faria,” 42 Pink Row, c/o 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Uncasville, CT. This letter provides comments based on review of the RAP by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Along with responding to the comments below, please also provide an updated schedule that includes the implementation of the various aspects of the RAP including the following: 1. Start-up and O&M for the expanding groundwater pump and treat system 2. Submittal of Revised Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) 3. Proposed soil vapor sampling at residential properties 4. Sampling/remediation of Interior Courtyard lead exceedances 5. Long-term stewardship permit application 6. ELUR application 7. Groundwater monitoring, O&M and Annual reporting DEEP’s and EPA’s comments are as follows: General Comments Response to General Comment 1: CT DEEP had requested the following in General Comment 1 of its October 11, 2017 letter: “As part of revising the RAP to address these comments, please include a separate Response to Comments document that provides Faria’s specific responses to DEEP’s/EPA’s comments. The Response to Comments document should include responses to each of the comments provided by DEEP and EPA in this letter and those attached to DEEP’s March 17, 2017 letter.” Faria's October 30, 2017 letter responds to CT DEEP’s October 17, 2017 comments, but does not include responses to those transmitted as part of CT DEEP’s March 17, 2017 letter. Please revise the October 30, 2017 letter to include responses to CT DEEP’s March 17, 2017 comments, revise the RAP if necessary, and specify where in the RAP the comments are addressed. Response to Specific Comment 17: CT DEEP had requested “a technical justification supporting the current monitoring plan and well network based on its adequacy for evaluating groundwater capture and risk to downgradient receptors in light of changes to the plume since the 2012 2 CMIP.” This was not provided in the response to Specific Comment 17, nor in the Groundwater Monitoring Plan in Appendix 19. The Groundwater Monitoring Plan in Appendix 19 should be explicitly supported by the site conceptual model and current site conditions. While the RAP includes a discussion of the site conceptual model in Appendix 12, the RAP does not explicitly use this information to support the monitoring plan and to identify any potential monitoring gaps. As part of an adequately justified monitoring plan, the wells selected for evaluation of compliance with SWPC and RVC should be supported based on the conceptual site model and location of potential receptors and transport pathways, including vertical gradients, should be discussed in the context of the selection of these wells so that any potential pathways and receptors not adequately monitored can be identified. In addition, recent increases in the concentration of chlorinated solvents in deep overburden groundwater should be considered and discussed in the selection of monitoring points and frequency. This justification should also clearly articulate how the monitoring network will be used to evaluate the adequacy of plume capture by the groundwater recovery system and how this evaluation and any necessary actions to achieve capture will be communicated in annual monitoring reports. For the discussion on how adequacy of plume capture will be evaluated, CT DEEP and EPA recommend that Faria consider approaches set out in AECOM’s August 31 letter Regarding: Response to USEPA Comments on the CMI Plan, dated February 2012. Response to Specific Comment 19: The response proposes adding SMW-5 (shallow overburden) and SMW-9 (deep overburden) wells to the monitoring network if available and accessible and evaluating vertical gradients at MW-202R (bedrock) and MW-202PZ (shallow overburden). Consideration could also be given to including monitoring of existing off-site well MW-203D in addition to well clusters located closer to the elevated off-site deep overburden and bedrock concentrations. Regardless of the location proposed, the response and RAP should propose and justify locations for monitoring groundwater quality, and vertical and horizontal gradients based on a site conceptual model considering hydrogeology, contaminant distribution and trends, as well as current or potential surface water or vapor intrusion receptors. While evaluating vertical gradients at the MW-202 cluster should provide some information that will help understand the fate and transport of the PCE exceedances in deep overburden and bedrock, the sufficiency of this one location as a data point for assessing off-site vertical gradients should be evaluated in the context of the site conceptual model. In addition, while it is worth evaluating potential for sampling at existing off-site wells from a cost saving perspective, this proposal should be justified based on the site conceptual model as well as any known construction details for these wells. Response to Specific Comment 20: The initial comment generally requested that the RAP explain how the effect of the groundwater pump and treat system operation on VOC bedrock groundwater concentrations, further migration of VOCs in/from bedrock groundwater, and vertical gradients between bedrock, deep, and shallow overburden groundwater will be monitored and cited that no monitoring or gauging is proposed at any monitoring wells downgradient of MW-202R, where RVC exceedances are observed in bedrock, nor at any other bedrock wells across the site. The response does not fully address these concerns. Please respond to the original comment in the context of the site conceptual model (as requested for Responses to Comment 17 and 19, above). 3 Comments on the RAP 1. Section 2.4, page 6 of the RAP states, “Currently there are no residences in the area that use water supply wells.” This statement is misleading without details on what “the area” consists of. Faria should provide an updated well water receptor survey map that shows the parcels to the north, east, and south of the facility that clearly identifies which properties have been connected to public water and which properties utilize on-site drinking water wells. In addition, the RAP should include a discussion on the need to conduct any future monitoring of nearby drinking water wells to ensure that the groundwater plume emanating from the Faria facility does not adversely impact drinking water quality at these locations and to further support Faria’s Conceptual Site Model. 2. Section 2.5.1, page 8 of the RAP states, in reference to tetrachloroethene (PCE) concentrations on or emanating from Faria: “The highest offsite concentration currently, 15,000 µg/L, was collected from the deep overburden well, MW-205D.” The RAP notes in subsequent sections that this sample was collected in June 2017 and also reports a 16,000 µg/L PCE concentration detected in August 2017 at RW 303D. Please revise the RAP to include further discussion regarding: possible hypotheses that would account for this order-of-magnitude increase in PCE groundwater concentrations relative to recent on and off-site concentrations; an updated discussion regarding potential for DNAPL in consideration of these concentrations; and steps to investigate and monitor these concentration increases including consideration of more frequent groundwater quality monitoring. 3. Section 3.1, page 11 of the RAP includes a table showing the changes in the proposed remedy for each area of concern from the 2010 CMS and the latest revision of Faria’s RAP include a 3” asphalt cap and ELUR to address arsenic exceedances in soil above the residential direct exposure criteria. Section 3.2.2, page 17 describes remedial excavations of impacted soils in this area in 2016 and goes on to state “Confirmatory soil sample testing results indicate that all associated RSR criteria were met.” Footnote #14 further indicates “As noted above, with remedial excavations completed in Area 3 and a ground water reclassification from GA to GB, the requests for an EC should be rescinded.” Please revise the table in Section 3.1 to clearly indicate whether an EC is proposed for this area. If it has been determined that an EC is no longer needed, the table should be clear to indicate that the asphalt cap is only needed for rendering the soils inaccessible under the RSRs and the updated RAP should clearly explain this change. 4. Section 3.1, Footnote 10 on Page 12 states: “RVC exceedances were only noted in deep overburden groundwater, greater than 15 ft. bg, where RVC criteria do not apply. Groundwater from sentinel monitoring wells (e.g., upgradient of the nearest surface water body (Thames River)) are compliant with the SWP.” Please revise this footnote, Footnote 12 on Page 13, Section 3.3.1 on Page 20 and other parts of the RAP as appropriate to consider Comments 7 from CT DEEP’s March 17, 2017 letter as well as an understanding of the transport potential of upgradient and/or deeper concentrations exceeding Volatilization Criteria and Surface Water Protection Criteria per Specific Comments 19 and 20 from CT DEEP’s October 11, 2017 comments. 4 5. Section 3.2.1, Page 15 states: “Indoor air samples will be collected after Faria removes their equipment and the area is power-washed clean and before residential occupants enter the building.” Please provide a plan for performing this initial indoor air sampling. In the schedule in Section 4.0, please include a plan for regular indoor air monitoring, until compliance with the Residential Volatilization Criteria is achieved, to ensure that residents of the facility are not exposed to VOCs entering the building via vapor intrusion. 6. Section 3.3.5, Page 24 states: “The CTDEEP Water Supply Well Receptor Survey Guidance Document (January 2015) was used to calculate the capture zone of potable wells potential operating within 500 feet.” Please revise the RAP to provide these calculations. 7. Table 1A identifies SB-335 as having PAHs exceeding GB Pollutant Mobility Criteria (PMC). Please revise the RAP to include the approach for achieving compliance with Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations with respect to this exceedance. 8. Appendix 17, Section 2.2 states that “in-situ soil vapor and soil vapor from the residential off-site SSDSs will be collected using Suma Canisters and analyzed by a State approved laboratory for VOCs via EPA Method TO-15.” For the in-situ soil vapor samples, please be aware that the EPA OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air (https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/oswer-vapor-intrusion-technical-guide-final.pdf ) recommends that soil vapor samples collected for purposes of evaluating vapor intrusion be collected directly beneath the building structure in the coarsest, driest material in the vadose zone. In homogeneous soil, when the vapor source is beneath the building, soil gas concentrations tend to be greater beneath the building than at the same depth in adjacent open areas, even if the source is laterally extensive relative to the building footprint. Based on this information, soil gas samples collected outside of the building footprint would not be expected to accurately estimate sub-slab and hence indoor air concentrations. 9. Appendix 19, Section 1.0 states: “Groundwater sampling and gauging was performed last in June 2016.” It is important that the groundwater monitoring plan reflect all site data, particularly given the sharp increases in deep overburden concentrations observed in 2017. Please revise Appendix 19 to consider all groundwater data collected to date. 10. Appendix 19, Section 1.0 presents a list of Contaminants of Concern (COCs) in groundwater. However, the plan does not specify what the analytical parameters will be for groundwater samples collected as part of the monitoring plan. This information should be added to Appendix 19 and specified in the QAPP. The parameter list should include full suites of parameters for each contaminant class of concern plus 1,4-dioxane as specified in the 2006 QAPP Addendum prepared by ENSR for Faria, unless there is a well-supported justification provided for eliminating individual constituents. APPENDIX 6 ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT FORM-NULL-PVC tropeR paM suidaR yrammuS RDE 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Farria Beede 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 Inquiry Number: 5445063.2s October 05, 2018 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 230 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-20 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-22 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC5445063.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5445063.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TURNPIKE UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 COORDINATES 41.4365140 - 41˚ 26’ 11.45’’Latitude (North): 72.1074110 - 72˚ 6’ 26.67’’Longitude (West): Zone 18Universal Tranverse Mercator: 741678.6UTM X (Meters): 4591042.5UTM Y (Meters): 40 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY TP Target Property: U.S. Geological SurveySource: W Target Property: U.S. Geological SurveySource: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140712Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 5445063.2s Page 2 37 MONTVILLE POWER LLC 74 LATHROP RD CORRACTS, RCRA-TSDF, RCRA-SQG, 2020 COR ACTION, US...Lower 2382, 0.451, South F36 STONE CONTAINER 125 DEPOT ROAD CT SDADB, CT CPCS Lower 1899, 0.360, East F35 A E S THAMES INC 125 DEPOT RD CT LUST, CT SPILLS, CT ENF, CT MANIFEST, CT NPDES Lower 1871, 0.354, ESE 34 MIDWAY MOBIL 568 NORWICH NEW LOND CT UST Higher 1284, 0.243, NNE 33 MONTVILLE TOWN WPCF 51 PINK ROW CT LWDS Lower 1264, 0.239, NE 32 JOHN J DOYLE SAND & US MINES Lower 858, 0.162, NE E31 MONTVILLE POLICE STA FORT SHANTOK RD. CT UST Higher 641, 0.121, SW E30 UNCASVILLE SCHOOL NORWICH NEW LONDON T CT UST Higher 641, 0.121, SW 29 MONTVILLE CO (7321) 12 LATHROP RD CT UST Higher 495, 0.094, SSE E28 TOWN HALL BUILDING 310 NORWICH NEW LOND CT UST Higher 490, 0.093, WSW E27 TOWN OF MONTVILLE 310 NORWICH NEW LOND CT MANIFEST Higher 490, 0.093, WSW E26 MONTVILLE TOWN HALL 310 NORWICH - NEW LO NY MANIFEST Higher 490, 0.093, WSW E25 TOWN OF MONTVILLE TO 310 NORWICH NEW LOND CT MANIFEST Higher 490, 0.093, WSW E24 MONTIVILLE TOWN HALL 310 NORWICH-NEW LOND CT MANIFEST Higher 490, 0.093, WSW E23 W & B KEENEY INC 309 NORWICH NEW LOND EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 483, 0.091, SW C22 TEXACO GAS STATION 341 NEW LONDON TURNP CT LWDS Higher 264, 0.050, West D21 THAMES PERMACRETE CO PINK ROW CT UST Lower 211, 0.040, ENE D20 THOMAS G. FARIA CORP 42 PINK ROW CT UST Lower 211, 0.040, ENE C19 RICKS AUTO LLC 341 RT 32 CT MANIFEST Higher 201, 0.038, WSW C18 MONTVILLE AUTO INC 341 NRWICH NEW LNDON EDR Hist Auto Higher 201, 0.038, WSW C17 MONTVILLE AUTO INC 341 NORWICH NEW LOND CT UST Higher 141, 0.027, WSW C16 CORNER TIRE CENTER 341 NORWICH-NW LONDO EDR Hist Auto Higher 141, 0.027, WSW 15 D W TRANSPORT & LEAS 33 PEQUOT RD RCRA NonGen / NLR, ICIS, US AIRS Lower 46, 0.009, SSE B14 THOMAS FARIA CORP. PINK STREET CT SHWS, CT SDADB, CT CPCS Lower 1 ft. B13 THOMAS G FARIA CORP PINK ROW CT LWDS Lower 1 ft. A12 THOMAS G FARIA CORP PINK ROW CT LWDS Lower 1 ft. A11 THOMAS G. FARIA CORP 385 NORWICH-NEW LOND CT ENF, CT NPDES TP A10 THOMAS G FARIA CORPO 385 NORWICH-NEW LOND ICIS TP A9 FARIA THOMAS G CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LOND SEMS-ARCHIVE, CORRACTS, RCRA-TSDF, RCRA-SQG, US... TP A8 THOMAS G. FARIA CORP 385 NORWICH AVENUE - CT NPDES TP A7 THOMAS G. FARIA CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LOND ICIS, FINDS, ECHO TP A6 FARIA CORP, THOMAS G 385 NORWICH-NEW LOND CT AIRS TP A5 FARIA THOMAS G CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LOND CT AIRS, CT ENF, CT MANIFEST TP A4 385 NORWICH/NEW LOND CT SPILLS TP A3 FARIA THOMAS G CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LOND NY MANIFEST TP A2 THOMAS G FARIA CORPO 385 NOWICH NEW LONDO CT BROWNFIELDS TP A1 FARIA BEEDE INSTRUME 385 NORWICH-NEW LOND CT PROPERTY TP MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TURNPIKE UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5445063.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA IDDatabase(s)Site FARIA BEEDE INSTRUME 385 NORWICH-NEW LOND MONTVILLE, CT N/ACT PROPERTY THOMAS G FARIA CORPO 385 NOWICH NEW LONDO MONTVILLE, CT N/ACT BROWNFIELDS Database: BROWNFIELDS 2, Date of Government Version: 08/03/2017 FARIA THOMAS G CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LOND UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 N/ANY MANIFEST EPA ID: CTD043038744 385 NORWICH/NEW LOND 385 NORWICH/NEW LOND MONTVILLE, CT N/ACT SPILLS Case Number: 3181 FARIA THOMAS G CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LOND UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 N/ACT AIRS CT ENF Status: Active Enforcement Action Id: COWRIN11003 CT MANIFEST EPA Id: CTD043038744 FARIA CORP, THOMAS G 385 NORWICH-NEW LOND UNCASVILLE, CT N/ACT AIRS OBS: 1238 OBS: 1239 THOMAS G. FARIA CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LOND MONTVILLE (UNCASVILLE), CT 06382 N/AICIS FRS ID:: 110030313676 FINDS Registry ID:: 110030313676 ECHO Registry ID: 110030313676 THOMAS G. FARIA CORP 385 NORWICH AVENUE - MONTVILLE, CT 06382 N/ACT NPDES Permit Number: GSI001414 Permit Number: CT0003158 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5445063.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 FARIA THOMAS G CORP 385 NORWICH NEW LOND UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 CTD043038744SEMS-ARCHIVE Site ID: 0100143 EPA Id: CTD043038744 CORRACTS EPA ID:: CTD043038744 RCRA-TSDF EPA ID:: CTD043038744 RCRA-SQG EPA ID:: CTD043038744 US ENG CONTROLS EPA ID:: CTD043038744 EPA ID:: CTD043038744 2020 COR ACTION EPA ID:: CTD043038744 RAATS Status: 02 Facility ID: CTD043038744 RI MANIFEST EPA Id: CTD043038744 Manifest Document Number: CTB0018843 THOMAS G FARIA CORPO 385 NORWICH-NEW LOND MONTVILLE, CT 06382 N/AICIS FRS ID:: 110030313676 THOMAS G. FARIA CORP 385 NORWICH-NEW LOND UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 N/ACT ENF Enforcement Action Id: NOVWSWDH03073 CT NPDES Permit Number: GTC000220 Permit Number: GGR001229 SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5445063.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MONTVILLE POWER LLC 74 LATHROP RD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.451 mi.) 37 16 EPA ID:: CTD049181654 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: A review of the RCRA-TSDF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-TSDF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MONTVILLE POWER LLC 74 LATHROP RD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.451 mi.) 37 16 EPA ID:: CTD049181654 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS CT SHWS: A review of the CT SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/23/2010 has revealed that there is 1 CT SHWS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ THOMAS FARIA CORP. PINK STREET 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B14 11 State ID: 248 EPA ID: CTD043038744 CT SDADB: A review of the CT SDADB list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/23/2010 has revealed that there are 2 CT SDADB sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ THOMAS FARIA CORP. PINK STREET 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B14 11 Facility Id: 248 STONE CONTAINER 125 DEPOT ROAD E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.360 mi.) F36 16 Facility Id: 1630 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5445063.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists CT LUST: A review of the CT LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/31/2018 has revealed that there is 1 CT LUST site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ A E S THAMES INC 125 DEPOT RD ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.354 mi.) F35 15 Lust Status: 3 LUST Id: 28472 State and tribal registered storage tank lists CT UST: A review of the CT UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/19/2018 has revealed that there are 8 CT UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MONTVILLE AUTO INC 341 NORWICH NEW LOND WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.027 mi.) C17 12 Facility Id: 86-1309 Tank Status: Permanently Closed TOWN HALL BUILDING 310 NORWICH NEW LOND WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) E28 14 Facility Id: 86-1313 Facility Id: 86-1311 Tank Status: Currently In Use Tank Status: Permanently Closed MONTVILLE CO (7321) 12 LATHROP RD SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.094 mi.) 29 14 Facility Id: 86-10766 Tank Status: Currently In Use UNCASVILLE SCHOOL NORWICH NEW LONDON T SW 0 - 1/8 (0.121 mi.) E30 14 Facility Id: 86-11849 Tank Status: Permanently Closed Tank Status: Currently In Use MONTVILLE POLICE STA FORT SHANTOK RD. SW 0 - 1/8 (0.121 mi.) E31 15 Facility Id: 86-1348 Tank Status: Permanently Closed Tank Status: Currently In Use MIDWAY MOBIL 568 NORWICH NEW LOND NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.243 mi.) 34 15 Facility Id: 86-9088 Tank Status: Permanently Closed Tank Status: Currently In Use PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ THOMAS G. FARIA CORP 42 PINK ROW ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.040 mi.) D20 12 Facility Id: 86-1387 Tank Status: Permanently Closed THAMES PERMACRETE CO PINK ROW ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.040 mi.) D21 13 Facility Id: 86-1385 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5445063.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Tank Status: Permanently Closed ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ D W TRANSPORT & LEAS 33 PEQUOT RD SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.009 mi.) 15 11 EPA ID:: CTD983902370 US MINES: A review of the US MINES list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 US MINES site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ JOHN J DOYLE SAND & NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) 32 15 Database: US MINES, Date of Government Version: 05/03/2018 Mine ID:: 0600233 CT CPCS: A review of the CT CPCS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/07/2018 has revealed that there are 2 CT CPCS sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ THOMAS FARIA CORP. PINK STREET 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B14 11 STONE CONTAINER 125 DEPOT ROAD E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.360 mi.) F36 16 Lust Status: Cleanup Initiated CT LWDS: A review of the CT LWDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/17/2009 has revealed that there are 4 CT LWDS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TEXACO GAS STATION 341 NEW LONDON TURNP W 0 - 1/8 (0.050 mi.) C22 13 Leachate and Wastewater Number: 3004018 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ THOMAS G FARIA CORP PINK ROW 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A12 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5445063.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Leachate and Wastewater Number: 3004013 THOMAS G FARIA CORP PINK ROW 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B13 11 Leachate and Wastewater Number: 3004010 MONTVILLE TOWN WPCF 51 PINK ROW NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.239 mi.) 33 15 Leachate and Wastewater Number: 3004017 CT MANIFEST: A review of the CT MANIFEST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/10/2018 has revealed that there are 4 CT MANIFEST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RICKS AUTO LLC 341 RT 32 WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.038 mi.) C19 12 EPA Id: CTP000024140 MONTIVILLE TOWN HALL 310 NORWICH-NEW LOND WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) E24 13 EPA Id: CTP000024323 TOWN OF MONTVILLE TO 310 NORWICH NEW LOND WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) E25 13 EPA Id: CTP000012994 EPA Id: CTP000015840 TOWN OF MONTVILLE 310 NORWICH NEW LOND WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) E27 14 EPA Id: CTP000024323 NY MANIFEST: A review of the NY MANIFEST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 NY MANIFEST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MONTVILLE TOWN HALL 310 NORWICH - NEW LO WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) E26 14 EPA ID: CTP000024323 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto: A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 EDR Hist Auto sites within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CORNER TIRE CENTER 341 NORWICH-NW LONDO WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.027 mi.) C16 12 MONTVILLE AUTO INC 341 NRWICH NEW LNDON WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.038 mi.) C18 12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5445063.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 EDR Hist Cleaner: A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ W & B KEENEY INC 309 NORWICH NEW LOND SW 0 - 1/8 (0.091 mi.) E23 13 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 7 records.MONTVILLE S104254351FOX’S PRIVATE LANDFILLROUTE 163 CT SDADBMONTVILLE S104563230ROBERTSON PAPER BOX CO., INC.ROUTE 163 CT SDADB, CT SWF/LF, CT PROPERTMONTVILLE S104254359R. BELANGER PROPERTYROUTE 16306353CT SDADBMONTVILLE S105147234PALMER SCHOOL - TOWN OF MONTVILLEMAPLE AVENUE06353CT LUST, CT SPILLS, CT CPCSMONTVILLE S121203111UNCASVILLE HENNY PENNY2212 NORWICH NEW LONDON TURNPI CT LUSTMONTVILLE S109033318MIDWAY MOBIL568 NORWICH NEW LONDON TURNPIK06353CT LUST, CT SPILLS, CT ENF, CTNPDESMONTVILLE S117978864CONNECTICUT DOT MONTIVILLE ELECTIC2090 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TURNPI CT LUSTTC5445063.2s Page 230 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.115 kV69 kV 3 6 0320 2 80 120 120160200200 8080 8080 800 120160 2 4 0 200320 3 2 0 200280 280120120280 24 0 240 2 0 0 200 200 40 160 160160120120120 4020 0 20 0 80 16080 80 408040 8080 40120160 404040160160260160160120120120 8080808 0 8080 808040404 0 4040 40404040 12 0 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.12040804080404080 80 4080 4080 80 80804040 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 1 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 1SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 2 NR 0 1 0 0 1.000 1CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 2 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500 1RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 1 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 1RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 1 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 1US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 1 NR 0 0 0 1 1.000CT SHWS 2 NR NR 1 0 1 0.500CT SDADB State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CT SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500CT LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST TC5445063.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 8 NR NR NR 1 7 0.250CT UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CT AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CT ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CT AUL State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CT VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 1 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 1CT BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CT SWRCY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCT CDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL Local Land Records 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1CT PROPERTY 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCT LIENS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1CT SPILLS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCT SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS TC5445063.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 1 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 12020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 2 NR NR NR NR NR TP 2ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1FINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1ECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 2 NR NR NR NR NR TP 2CT AIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCT ASBESTOS 2 NR NR 1 0 1 0.500CT CPCS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CT DRYCLEANERS 2 NR NR NR NR NR TP 2CT ENF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCT Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCT LEAD 4 NR NR NR 1 3 0.250CT LWDS 5 NR NR NR 0 4 0.250 1CT MANIFEST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250NJ MANIFEST 1 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 1RI MANIFEST 2 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250 1NY MANIFEST 2 NR NR NR NR NR TP 2CT NPDES 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CT SEH 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCT UIC EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP TC5445063.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 2 NR NR NR NR 2 0.125EDR Hist Auto 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCT RGA HWS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCT RGA LUST 53 0 0 5 3 22 23- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5445063.2s Page 7 TC5445063.2s Page 8 A5 CT AIRSFARIA THOMAS G CORP S109726789 Target CT ENF385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK N/A Property CT MANIFESTUNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details CT ENF Enforcement Action Id: COWRIN11003 Status: Active CT MANIFEST EPA Id: CTD043038744 A4 CT SPILLS S104081831 Target 385 NORWICH/NEW LONDON TNPKE N/A Property MONTVILLE, CT Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details CT SPILLS Case Number: 3181 A3 NY MANIFESTFARIA THOMAS G CORP S119069194 Target 385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK N/A Property UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details NY MANIFEST EPA ID: CTD043038744 A2 CT BROWNFIELDSTHOMAS G FARIA CORPORATION S120847503 Target 385 NOWICH NEW LONDON TURNPIKE N/A Property MONTVILLE, CT Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details A1 CT PROPERTYFARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS FKA THOMAS FARIA S120783820 Target 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TURNPIKE AKA 42 PINK ROW N/A Property MONTVILLE, CT Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC5445063.2s Page 9 A9 SEMS-ARCHIVEFARIA THOMAS G CORP 1000245276 Target CORRACTS385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK CTD043038744 Property RCRA-TSDFUNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details RCRA-SQG US ENG CONTROLS 2020 COR ACTION RAATS RI MANIFEST SEMS-ARCHIVE Site ID: 0100143 EPA Id: CTD043038744 CORRACTS EPA ID:: CTD043038744 A8 CT NPDESTHOMAS G. FARIA CORPORATION S108300507 Target 385 NORWICH AVENUE - NEW LONDON TURNPIKE N/A Property MONTVILLE, CT 06382 Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details CT NPDES Permit Number: GSI001414 Permit Number: CT0003158 A7 ICISTHOMAS G. FARIA CORPORATION 1016075043 Target FINDS385 NORWICH NEW LONDON TURNPIKE N/A Property ECHOMONTVILLE (UNCASVILLE), CT 06382 Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details ICIS FRS ID:: 110030313676 FINDS Registry ID:: 110030313676 ECHO Registry ID: 110030313676 A6 CT AIRSFARIA CORP, THOMAS G S108311302 Target 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TPKE N/A Property UNCASVILLE, CT Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details CT AIRS OBS: 1238 OBS: 1239 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC5445063.2s Page 10 A11 CT ENFTHOMAS G. FARIA CORPORATION S107412495 Target CT NPDES385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TURNPIKE N/A Property UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details CT ENF Enforcement Action Id: NOVWSWDH03073 CT NPDES Permit Number: GTC000220 Permit Number: GGR001229 A10 ICISTHOMAS G FARIA CORPORATION 1018307391 Target 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TPK N/A Property MONTVILLE, CT 06382 Actual: 40 ft. Click here for full text details ICIS FRS ID:: 110030313676 FARIA THOMAS G CORP (Continued) 1000245276 RCRA-TSDF EPA Id: CTD043038744 RCRA-SQG EPA Id: CTD043038744 US ENG CONTROLS EPA ID:: CTD043038744 EPA ID:: CTD043038744 2020 COR ACTION EPA ID:: CTD043038744 RAATS Status: 02 Facility ID: CTD043038744 RI MANIFEST EPA Id: CTD043038744 Manifest Document Number: CTB0018843 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC5445063.2s Page 11 15 RCRA NonGen / NLRD W TRANSPORT & LEASING INC 1000686990 SSE ICIS33 PEQUOT RD CTD983902370 < 1/8 US AIRSUNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 0.009 mi. 46 ft. RCRA NonGen / NLR EPA Id: CTD983902370 ICIS FRS ID:: 110002493631 US AIRS EPA plant ID:: 110002493631 B14 CT SHWSTHOMAS FARIA CORP.S100996751 CT SDADBPINK STREET N/A < 1/8 CT CPCSMONTVILLE, CT 06353 Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 1 ft. CT SHWS State ID: 248 EPA ID: CTD043038744 CT SDADB Facility Id: 248 B13 CT LWDSTHOMAS G FARIA CORP S109938622 PINK ROW N/A < 1/8 MONTVILLE, CT Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 1 ft. CT LWDS Leachate and Wastewater Number: 3004010 A12 CT LWDSTHOMAS G FARIA CORP S109938623 PINK ROW N/A < 1/8 MONTVILLE, CT Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 1 ft. CT LWDS Leachate and Wastewater Number: 3004013 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC5445063.2s Page 12 D20 CT USTTHOMAS G. FARIA CORPORATION U003540459 ENE 42 PINK ROW N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 0.040 mi. 211 ft. CT UST Tank Status: Permanently Closed Facility Id: 86-1387 C19 CT MANIFESTRICKS AUTO LLC S109751533 WSW 341 RT 32 N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.038 mi. 201 ft. CT MANIFEST EPA Id: CTP000024140 C18 EDR Hist AutoMONTVILLE AUTO INC 1020392283 WSW 341 NRWICH NEW LNDON TWKP N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.038 mi. 201 ft. C17 CT USTMONTVILLE AUTO INC U004246494 WSW 341 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.027 mi. 141 ft. CT UST Tank Status: Permanently Closed Facility Id: 86-1309 C16 EDR Hist AutoCORNER TIRE CENTER 1021151374 WSW 341 NORWICH-NW LONDON TPK N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.027 mi. 141 ft. MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC5445063.2s Page 13 E25 CT MANIFESTTOWN OF MONTVILLE TOWN HALL S109742097 WSW 310 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.093 mi. 490 ft. CT MANIFEST EPA Id: CTP000012994 EPA Id: CTP000015840 E24 CT MANIFESTMONTIVILLE TOWN HALL S113478473 WSW 310 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TPK N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.093 mi. 490 ft. CT MANIFEST EPA Id: CTP000024323 E23 EDR Hist CleanerW & B KEENEY INC 1020116032 SW 309 NORWICH NEW LONDON TP N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.091 mi. 483 ft. C22 CT LWDSTEXACO GAS STATION S109939172 West 341 NEW LONDON TURNPIKE ROUTE 32 N/A < 1/8 MONTVILLE, CT Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.050 mi. 264 ft. CT LWDS Leachate and Wastewater Number: 3004018 D21 CT USTTHAMES PERMACRETE CORPORATION U003540458 ENE PINK ROW N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 0.040 mi. 211 ft. CT UST Tank Status: Permanently Closed Facility Id: 86-1385 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC5445063.2s Page 14 E30 CT USTUNCASVILLE SCHOOL U003662835 SW NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE. N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.121 mi. 641 ft. CT UST Tank Status: Permanently Closed Tank Status: Currently In Use Facility Id: 86-11849 29 CT USTMONTVILLE CO (7321)U004246484 SSE 12 LATHROP RD N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.094 mi. 495 ft. CT UST Tank Status: Currently In Use Facility Id: 86-10766 E28 CT USTTOWN HALL BUILDING U004246496 WSW 310 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.093 mi. 490 ft. CT UST Tank Status: Currently In Use Tank Status: Permanently Closed Facility Id: 86-1313 Facility Id: 86-1311 E27 CT MANIFESTTOWN OF MONTVILLE S121139386 WSW 310 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPK N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.093 mi. 490 ft. CT MANIFEST EPA Id: CTP000024323 E26 NY MANIFESTMONTVILLE TOWN HALL 1009220549 WSW 310 NORWICH - NEW LONDON TRPK N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.093 mi. 490 ft. NY MANIFEST EPA ID: CTP000024323 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC5445063.2s Page 15 F35 CT LUSTA E S THAMES INC S104086555 ESE CT SPILLS125 DEPOT RD N/A 1/4-1/2 CT ENFUNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 0.354 mi.CT MANIFEST 1871 ft.CT NPDES CT LUST Lust Status: Cleanup Initiated LUST Id: 28472 CT SPILLS 34 CT USTMIDWAY MOBIL U002176325 NNE 568 NORWICH NEW LONDON TPKE. N/A 1/8-1/4 MONTVILLE, CT 06353 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.243 mi. 1284 ft. CT UST Tank Status: Permanently Closed Tank Status: Currently In Use Facility Id: 86-9088 33 CT LWDSMONTVILLE TOWN WPCF S109938625 NE 51 PINK ROW N/A 1/8-1/4 MONTVILLE, CT Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 0.239 mi. 1264 ft. CT LWDS Leachate and Wastewater Number: 3004017 32 US MINESJOHN J DOYLE SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY INC 1011136160 NE N/A 1/8-1/4 NEW LONDON (County), CT Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 0.162 mi. 858 ft. US MINES Mine ID:: 0600233 E31 CT USTMONTVILLE POLICE STATION U002022077 SW FORT SHANTOK RD. N/A < 1/8 UNCASVILLE, CT Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.121 mi. 641 ft. CT UST Tank Status: Permanently Closed Tank Status: Currently In Use Facility Id: 86-1348 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC5445063.2s Page 16 37 CORRACTSMONTVILLE POWER LLC 1000284950 South RCRA-TSDF74 LATHROP RD CTD049181654 1/4-1/2 RCRA-SQGUNCASVILLE, CT 06382 Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 0.451 mi.2020 COR ACTION 2382 ft.US AIRS RI MANIFEST NY MANIFEST NJ MANIFEST CORRACTS EPA ID:: CTD049181654 RCRA-TSDF EPA Id: CTD049181654 RCRA-SQG F36 CT SDADBSTONE CONTAINER U002172204 East CT CPCS125 DEPOT ROAD N/A 1/4-1/2 MONTVILLE, CT 06353 Relative: Lower Click here for full text details 0.360 mi. 1899 ft. CT SDADB Facility Id: 1630 CT CPCS Lust Status: Cleanup Initiated A E S THAMES INC (Continued)S104086555 Case Number: 2169 CT ENF Enforcement Action Id: COAR8124--02005 Enforcement Action Id: COAR8124A-03011 CT MANIFEST EPA Id: CTP000013481 EPA Id: CTD983901778 CT NPDES Permit Number: GSW000119 Permit Number: SP0002253 Permit Number: SP0001188 Permit Number: CT0026298 Permit Number: UI0000217 Permit Number: GSW000013 Permit Number: GSI000527 Permit Number: CT0021041 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC5445063.2s Page 17 MONTVILLE POWER LLC (Continued) 1000284950 EPA Id: CTD049181654 2020 COR ACTION EPA ID:: CTD049181654 US AIRS EPA plant ID:: 110000316006 RI MANIFEST EPA Id: CTD049181654 Manifest Document Number: RIS0017359 NY MANIFEST EPA ID: CTD049181654 NJ MANIFEST EPA Id: CTD049181654 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.CT AIRS Permitted Air Sources Listing Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/25/2018 07/31/2018 09/13/2018CT ASBESTOS Asbestos Notification Listing Department of Public Health 08/01/2018 08/02/2018 09/10/2018CT AST Marine Terminals and Tank Information Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 06/30/2018 08/09/2018 09/10/2018CT AUL ELUR Sites Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 05/04/2018 05/18/2018 06/20/2018CT BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Inventory Connecticut Brownfields Redevelopment Authori 03/25/2016 03/29/2016 05/18/2016CT BROWNFIELDS 2 Brownfields Inventory Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 08/03/2017 09/20/2017 09/26/2017CT CDL Clandestine Drug Lab Listing Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/31/2018 08/06/2018 09/10/2018CT CPCS Contaminated or Potentially Contaminated Sites Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 08/07/2018 08/10/2018 09/10/2018CT CT MANIFEST Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 08/10/2018 08/10/2018 09/10/2018CT CT PROPERTY Property Transfer Filings Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 08/10/2018 08/10/2018 09/10/2018CT DRYCLEANERS Drycleaner Facilities Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/18/2008 08/08/2008 08/27/2008CT ENFORCEMENT Enforcement Case Listing Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 09/21/2018 09/21/2018 10/04/2018CT ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Listing Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 03/05/2013 05/07/2013 06/19/2013CT Financial Assurance 1 Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 06/14/2018 06/22/201807/31/2018CT Financial Assurance 2 Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 06/14/2018 06/22/201807/31/2018CT LEAD Lead Inspection Database Department of Public Health 03/26/2014 03/27/2014 05/08/2014CT LIENS Environmental Liens Listing Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 10/23/2017 11/17/2017 12/13/2017CT LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank List Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/31/2018 08/06/2018 09/10/2018CT LWDS Connecticut Leachate and Wastewater Discharge Sites Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/17/2009 10/21/2009 10/30/2009CT NPDES Wastewater Permit Listing Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/13/2018 07/18/2018 08/01/2018CT RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilitie Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/01/2013 01/02/2014CT RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tan Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/01/2013 01/02/2014CT SDADB Site Discovery and Assessment Database Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 04/23/2010 04/23/2010 05/25/2010CT SEH List of Significant Environmental Hazards Report to DEEP Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 06/30/2018 07/24/2018 08/01/2018CT SHWS Inventory of Hazardous Disposal Sites Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 04/23/2010 04/23/2010 05/25/2010CT SPILLS Oil & Chemical Spill Database Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/31/2018 08/06/2018 09/10/2018CT SPILLS 90 SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch FirstSearch 10/15/2012 01/03/2013 02/11/2013CT SWF/LF List of Landfills/Transfer Stations Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 03/29/2018 07/25/2018 07/31/2018CT SWRCY Recycling Facilities Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 09/14/2018 09/20/2018 10/04/2018CT UIC Underground Injection Control Listing Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/16/2018 07/24/2018 09/14/2018CT UST Underground Storage Tank Data Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 06/19/2018 08/09/2018 09/10/2018CT VCP Voluntary Remediation Sites Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 08/10/2018 08/10/2018 09/10/2018US 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List Environmental Protection Agency 09/30/2017 05/08/2018 07/20/2018US ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines Department of Interior 09/10/2018 09/11/2018 09/14/2018US BRS Biennial Reporting System EPA/NTIS 12/31/2015 02/22/2017 09/28/2017US COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Department of Energy 12/31/2005 08/07/2009 10/22/2009US COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Environmental Protection Agency 07/01/2014 09/10/2014 10/20/2014US CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 03/31/2018 04/16/2018 06/29/2018US CORRACTS Corrective Action Report EPA 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EPA, Region 9 01/12/2009 05/07/2009 09/21/2009US DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing Environmental Protection Agency 01/04/2018 01/19/2018 04/13/2018US DOD Department of Defense Sites USGS 12/31/2005 11/10/2006 01/11/2007US DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeli 07/31/2012 08/07/2012 09/18/2012US Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions EPA 07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018US ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information Environmental Protection Agency 09/02/2018 09/05/2018 09/14/2018US EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR, Inc.TC5445063.2s Page GR-1GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date US EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR, Inc.US EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST Environmental Protection Agency 08/30/2013 03/21/2014 06/17/2014US ERNS Emergency Response Notification System National Response Center, United States Coast 06/18/2018 06/27/2018 09/14/2018US FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Environmental Protection Agency 11/07/2016 01/05/2017 04/07/2017US FEDLAND Federal and Indian Lands U.S. Geological Survey 12/31/2005 02/06/2006 01/11/2007US FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA 05/15/2017 05/30/2017 10/13/2017US FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EPA 02/21/2018 02/23/2018 03/23/2018US FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxi 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US FTTS INSP FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 01/31/2015 07/08/2015 10/13/2015US FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EPA 05/21/2018 05/23/2018 09/07/2018US FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Department of Energy 08/08/2017 09/11/2018 09/14/2018US HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US HIST FTTS INSP FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Lis Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/200704/10/2007US HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System U.S. Department of Transportation 03/26/2018 03/27/2018 06/08/2018US ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System Environmental Protection Agency 11/18/2016 11/23/2016 02/10/2017US IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian 04/01/2014 08/06/2014 01/29/2015US INDIAN LUST R1 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1 04/13/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R10 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 04/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 05/08/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R5 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 5 04/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R6 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 04/01/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R7 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 04/24/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 04/25/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R9 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Environmental Protection Agency 04/10/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/1998 12/03/2007 01/24/2008US INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations USGS 12/31/2014 07/14/2015 01/10/2017US INDIAN UST R1 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 1 04/13/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R10 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 04/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R4 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 05/08/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R5 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 5 04/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R6 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 04/01/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R7 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 04/24/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R8 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 04/25/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R9 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 9 04/10/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN VCP R1 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing EPA, Region 1 07/27/2015 09/29/2015 02/18/2016US INDIAN VCP R7 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng EPA, Region 7 03/20/2008 04/22/2008 05/19/2008US LEAD SMELTER 1 Lead Smelter Sites Environmental Protection Agency 05/13/2018 05/30/2018 06/29/2018US LEAD SMELTER 2 Lead Smelter Sites American Journal of Public Health 04/05/2001 10/27/2010 12/02/2010US LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Environmental Protection Agency 05/13/2018 05/30/2018 06/29/2018US LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Department of the Navy 05/14/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System Nuclear Regulatory Commission 08/30/2016 09/08/2016 10/21/2016US NPL National Priority List EPA 07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018US NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens EPA 10/15/1991 02/02/1994 03/30/1994US ODI Open Dump Inventory Environmental Protection Agency 06/30/1985 08/09/2004 09/17/2004US PADS PCB Activity Database System EPA 06/01/2017 06/09/2017 10/13/2017US PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database Environmental Protection Agency 05/24/2017 11/30/2017 12/15/2017TC5445063.2s Page GR-2GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date US PRP Potentially Responsible Parties EPA 10/25/2013 10/17/2014 10/20/2014US Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EPA 07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018US RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EPA 04/17/1995 07/03/1995 08/07/1995US RADINFO Radiation Information Database Environmental Protection Agency 04/03/2018 04/05/2018 06/29/2018US RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US RMP Risk Management Plans Environmental Protection Agency 05/01/2018 05/17/2018 09/07/2018US ROD Records Of Decision EPA 05/13/2018 05/30/2018 06/29/2018US SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Environmental Protection Agency 01/01/2017 02/03/2017 04/07/2017US SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA 07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018US SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive EPA 07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018US SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems EPA 12/31/2009 12/10/2010 02/25/2011US TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System EPA 12/31/2016 01/10/2018 01/12/2018US TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act EPA 12/31/2016 06/21/2017 01/05/2018US UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Department of Energy 06/23/2017 10/11/2017 11/03/2017US US AIRS (AFS) Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ( EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US AIRS MINOR Air Facility System Data EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Environmental Protection Agency 06/18/2018 06/20/2018 09/14/2018US US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Drug Enforcement Administration 05/18/2018 06/20/2018 09/14/2018US US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 07/31/2018 08/28/2018 09/14/2018US US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/27/2018 06/22/2018US US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Drug Enforcement Administration 05/18/2018 06/20/2018 09/14/2018US US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Environmental Protection Agency 07/31/2018 08/28/2018 09/14/2018US US MINES Mines Master Index File Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health A 05/03/2018 05/31/2018 06/29/2018US US MINES 2 Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing USGS 12/05/2005 02/29/2008 04/18/2008US US MINES 3 Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing USGS 04/14/2011 06/08/2011 09/13/2011US UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites Department of Defense 09/30/2017 06/19/2018 09/14/2018NJ NJ MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Environmental Protection 12/31/2017 07/13/2018 08/01/2018NY NY MANIFEST Facility and Manifest Data Department of Environmental Conservation 07/01/2018 08/01/2018 08/31/2018PA PA MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Environmental Protection 12/31/2016 07/25/2017 09/25/2017RI RI MANIFEST Manifest information Department of Environmental Management 12/31/2017 02/23/2018 04/09/2018VT VT MANIFEST Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Department of Environmental Conservation 08/23/2018 08/23/2018 09/18/2018WI WI MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Natural Resources 12/31/2017 06/15/2018 07/09/2018TC5445063.2s Page GR-3GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date US AHA Hospitals Sensitive Receptor: AHA Hospitals American Hospital Association, Inc.US Medical Centers Sensitive Receptor: Medical Centers Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesUS Nursing Homes Sensitive Receptor: Nursing Homes National Institutes of HealthUS Public Schools Sensitive Receptor: Public Schools National Center for Education StatisticsUS Private Schools Sensitive Receptor: Private Schools National Center for Education StatisticsCT Daycare Centers Sensitive Receptor: Licensed Child Care Facilities Department of Public HealthUS Flood Zones 100-year and 500-year flood zones Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)US NWI National Wetlands Inventory U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceCT State Wetlands Tidal Wetlands Department of Energy & Environmental ProtectionUS Topographic MapU.S. Geological SurveyUS Oil/Gas PipelinesPennWell CorporationUS Electric Power Transmission Line Data PennWell CorporationSTREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.TC5445063.2s Page GR-4GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date TC5445063.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5642435 PALMERTOWN, CTWest Map: 2012Version Date: 5644946 UNCASVILLE, CTTarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 40 ft. above sea levelElevation: 4591042.5UTM Y (Meters): 741678.6UTM X (Meters): Zone 18Universal Tranverse Mercator: 72.107411 - 72˚ 6’ 26.68’’Longitude (West): 41.436514 - 41˚ 26’ 11.45’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES UNCASVILLE, CT 06382 385 NORWICH-NEW LONDON TURNPIKE FARRIA BEEDE TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC5445063.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 40 ft. North South West East169143100757658452846406471971462202692471505322718716512983707894684022304029022244General ESEGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapUNCASVILLE NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data09011C0362J FEMA FIRM Flood data09011C0342G FEMA FIRM Flood data09011C0354G FEMA FIRM Flood data09011C0353G FEMA FIRM Flood data09011C0334G Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data09011C0361J Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Plutonic and Intrusive RocksCategory:PrecambrianEra: PrecambrianSystem: Z ganitic rocksSeries: ZgCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 13 23 1210 6 13 7 7 141 6 4 5 6 1 11 6 9 8 65 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC5445063.2s Page A-6 Min: 4.5 Max: 7.8 Min: 0.01 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay sandy loam very gravelly79 inches21 inches 3 Min: 4.5 Max: 7.8 Min: 0.01 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claygravelly loam21 inches 5 inches 2 Min: 4.5 Max: 7.8 Min: 0.01 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayloam 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Unknown Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: loamSoil Surface Texture: UdorthentsSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-7 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay gravelly sand extremely sand to cobbly coarse stratified59 inches42 inches 5 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay gravelly sand extremely sand to cobbly coarse stratified42 inches27 inches 4 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay sand very gravelly27 inches20 inches 3 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loamy sand very gravelly20 inches 7 inches 2 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam gravelly sandy 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: gravelly sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HinckleySoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-8 4.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay sandy loam gravelly fine64 inches27 inches 5 4.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay sandy loam gravelly fine27 inches18 inches 4 4.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam18 inches 7 inches 3 4.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam 7 inches 3 inches 2 4.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam 3 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 74 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: CharltonSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-9 Moderately well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: NinigretSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 5 Max: Min: Min: 0.07 Max: 141 Not reportedA-818 inches14 inches 5 Max: Min: Min: 0.07 Max: 141 Not reportedA-8 sandy loam gravelly fine14 inches 9 inches 4 Max: Min: Min: 0.07 Max: 141 Not reportedA-8 sandy loam channery fine 9 inches 5 inches 3 Max: Min: Min: 0.07 Max: 141 Not reportedA-8 sandy loam gravelly fine 5 inches 1 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 0.07 Max: 141 Not reportedA-8 plant material decomposed highly 1 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 2 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: highly decomposed plant materialSoil Surface Texture: HollisSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 4 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-10 Excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: gravelly sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HinckleySoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 6 Min: 4.5 Max: 6.5 Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay fine sand sand to loamy gravelly coarse stratified very64 inches25 inches 4 Min: 4.5 Max: 6.5 Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam25 inches16 inches 3 Min: 4.5 Max: 6.5 Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam16 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 4.5 Max: 6.5 Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 61 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-11 Soil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: gravelly sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: WaterSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 7 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay gravelly sand extremely sand to cobbly coarse stratified59 inches42 inches 5 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay gravelly sand extremely sand to cobbly coarse stratified42 inches27 inches 4 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay sand very gravelly27 inches20 inches 3 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loamy sand very gravelly20 inches 7 inches 2 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 141 Max: 703 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam gravelly sandy 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-12 Max: Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 soils, Peat. Highly organicA-8muck61 inches48 inches 5 Max: Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 soils, Peat. Highly organicA-8muck48 inches47 inches 4 Max: Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 soils, Peat. Highly organicA-8muck47 inches17 inches 3 Max: Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 soils, Peat. Highly organicA-8muck17 inches 1 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 4 Max: 42 soils, Peat. Highly organicA-8muck 1 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: All hydric Very poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: muckSoil Surface Texture: CatdenSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 8 No Layer Information available. > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Unknown ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-13 Min: 4.5 Max: 6.5 Min: 141 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam24 inches14 inches 3 Min: 4.5 Max: 6.5 Min: 141 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam14 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 4.5 Max: 6.5 Min: 141 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: AgawamSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 9 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-14 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8 sandy loam gravelly fine 3 inches 1 inches 2 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8 plant material decomposed moderately 1 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: moderately decomposed plant materialSoil Surface Texture: CantonSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 10 Min: 4.5 Max: 6.5 Min: 141 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay sand sand to fine gravelly coarse stratified very59 inches24 inches 4 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-15 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: MerrimacSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 11 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8 loamy sand very gravelly60 inches29 inches 6 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8gravelly loam29 inches24 inches 5 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8gravelly loam24 inches14 inches 4 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8gravelly loam14 inches 3 inches 3 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-16 Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: loamSoil Surface Texture: UdorthentsSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 12 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay gravelly sand sand to gravelly coarse stratified very59 inches24 inches 4 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam gravelly sandy24 inches16 inches 3 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam16 inches 9 inches 2 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam 9 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-17 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: moderately decomposed plant materialSoil Surface Texture: CantonSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 13 Min: 4.5 Max: 7.8 Min: 0.01 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay sandy loam very gravelly79 inches21 inches 3 Min: 4.5 Max: 7.8 Min: 0.01 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claygravelly loam21 inches 5 inches 2 Min: 4.5 Max: 7.8 Min: 0.01 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayloam 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Unknown ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-18 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: MerrimacSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 14 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8 loamy sand very gravelly60 inches29 inches 6 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8gravelly loam29 inches24 inches 5 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8gravelly loam24 inches14 inches 4 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8gravelly loam14 inches 3 inches 3 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8 sandy loam gravelly fine 3 inches 1 inches 2 3.5 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINEDA-8 plant material decomposed moderately 1 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-19 opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay gravelly sand sand to gravelly coarse stratified very59 inches24 inches 4 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam gravelly sandy24 inches16 inches 3 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam16 inches 9 inches 2 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 42 Max: 703 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam 9 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5445063.2s Page A-20 1/2 - 1 Mile NECTC000000000770 D11 1/2 - 1 Mile NECTC000000000771 D10 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWCTC000000001668 B6 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWCTC000000000772 B5 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWCTC000000001669 B4 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SWCT0869011 2 FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWUSGS40000225876 12 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUSGS40000225783 C9 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUSGS40000225791 C8 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUSGS40000225792 7 1/8 - 1/4 Mile ESEUSGS40000225824 A3 1/8 - 1/4 Mile ESEUSGS40000225825 A1 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 440400 360 3 6 03202 002 80 120 120160200200 8080 80 80320 0 8 0 8 0 120 2 8 0 2 4 0240240 1201201 20 1 6 0 2 00 4016040 3 603202802 4 0 240 2002 00320 3 2 0 2 00280 280120120280 240 24 0 20 0 200200 4040 160 160160120120120120402002008016040804080404 0 12040160 1404040 2 0 0 2 40160160120 2002 00160160200160160120120120 8080808 08080 8080804040404 0 40404 0 40404040 40 4 0 4 08 0 808 012 0 CT EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase A1 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower USGS40000225825FED USGSClick here for full text details 2 SW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher CT0869011FRDS PWSClick here for full text details A3 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower USGS40000225824FED USGSClick here for full text details B4 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CTC000000001669CT WELLSClick here for full text details B5 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CTC000000000772CT WELLSClick here for full text details B6 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CTC000000001668CT WELLSClick here for full text details 7 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000225792FED USGSClick here for full text details C8 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000225791FED USGSClick here for full text details Page: 1 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase C9 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000225783FED USGSClick here for full text details D10 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CTC000000000771CT WELLSClick here for full text details D11 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CTC000000000770CT WELLSClick here for full text details 12 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher USGS40000225876FED USGSClick here for full text details Page: 2 0%100%0%9.950 pCi/LBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.400 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 2 Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 06382 : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for NEW LONDON County: 1 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)36.3 (0)7 (63.6)11Salem 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)12 (12)87 (87)100Preston 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)3 (75)1 (25)4Pawcatuck 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (40)1 (20)2 (40)5Old Mystic 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (50)2 (50)4Old Lyme 0 (0)0 (0)2 (6.9)6 (20.7)8 (27.6)13 (44.8)29Oakdale 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (85.4)11 (84.6)13Norwich 0 (0)0 (0)2 (2)6 (5.9)20 (19.8)73 (72.3)101North Stonington 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)3 (6.5)43 (93.5)46North Franklin 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (100)1Noank 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)6 (50)6 (50)12Niantic 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (3)66 (97)68New London 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (22.2)7 (77.8)9Mystic 0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)5 (5)11 (10.9)84 (83.1)101Montville 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)3 (100)3Lyme 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)6 (100)6Ledyard 0 (0)0 (0)1 (12.5)0 (0)3 (37.5)4 (50)8Lebanon 0 (0)0 (0)2 (8)4 (16)8 (32)11 (44)25Hanover 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)7 (6.2)10 (8.9)96 (84.9)113Groton 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (66.7)1 (33.3)3Griswold 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (20)2 (20)6 (60)10Gales Ferry 0 (0)0 (0)1 (3)1 (3)2 (6.1)29 (87.9)33Franklin 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (100)1East Lyme 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (33.3)4 (66.7)6Colchester 0 (0)0 (0)1 (12.5)2 (25)1 (12.5)4 (50)8Canterbury 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (50)1 (50)2Bozrah 0 (0)0 (0)1 (1.4)4 (5.4)19 (25.7)50 (67.7)74Baltic 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)7 (6.5)100 (93.5)107Waterford 0 (0)1 (1.2)2 (2.4)5 (5.9)17 (20.2)59 (70.2)84Voluntown 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)6 (15.4)5 (38.5)6 (46.1)13Uncasville 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (100)1Taftville 0 (0)0 (0)2 (1.9)4 (3.9)10 (9.7)87 (84.5)103Stonington 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (100)1Sprague ___________________________________________________________________________ > 100 Pci/L50 < 100 Pci/L20 < 50 Pci/L10 < 20 Pci/L4 < 10 Pci/L< 4 Pci/L# SitesCity Radon Test Results State Database: CT Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TC5445063.2s Page 3 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Tidal Wetlands Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-4054 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5445063.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Connecticut Leachate and Wastewater Discharge Sites Source: Department of Environmental Protection The Leachate and Waste Water Discharge Inventory Data Layer (LWDS) includes point locations digitized from Leachate and Wastewater Discharge Source maps compiled by the Connecticut DEP. These maps locate surface and groundwater discharges that (1) have received a waste water discharge permit from the state or (2) are historic and now defunct waste sites or (3) are locations of accidental spills, leaks, or discharges of a variety of liquid or solid wastes. EPA-Approved Sole Source Aquifers in Connecticut Source: EPA Sole source aquifers are defined as an aquifer designated as the sole or principal source of drinking water for a given aquifer service area; that is, an aquifer which is needed to supply 50% or more of the drinking water for the area and for which there are no reasonable alternative sources should the aquifer become contaminated. Community and Non-Community Water System Wells Source: Department of Public Health, Water Supplies Section Telephone: 860-509-7333 Active, emergency and inactive wells used for potable purposes that are owned and operated by active community and non-community water systems in Connecticut. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION RADON State Database: CT Radon Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 860-509-7367 Radon Statistical Summary Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. TC5445063.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5445063.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS ASSESSMENT FARIA BEEDE UNCASVILLE, CT 06608 FOR: Dakota Partners 1264 Main Street Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 BY: Nobis Engineering, Inc. 378 Chase Avenue Waterbury, CT NOBIS ENGINEERING, INC. (800) 394-4182 www.nobiseng.com Nobis Project No. 91730.02 OCTOBER 2016 Nobis Engineering, Inc. 378 Chase Avenue Suite 301 Waterbury, CT 06704 T (203) 409-1292 October 17, 2016 Project No. 91730.02 Mr. Christopher Mora Dakota Partners 1264 Main Street Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 Via email: cmora@dakotapartners.net Re: Hazardous Building Materials Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Dear Mr. Mora: Enclosed is our Hazardous Building Materials Assessment (HBMA) report of the Faria Beede facility located 42 Pink Row in Uncasville, CT. Our assessment included collecting and testing samples for asbestos and polychlorinated biphenyls, screening painted building materials for lead, and observing the presence of other hazardous building materials. Nobis performed this survey to support the potential renovation of the Site and conversion into residential apartments by Dakota Partners. The means and methods of the preliminary survey are provided below as well as estimates for the cost of abating the hazardous building materials that were identified. The findings of this report are preliminary until plans for renovation and repurposing of the building are further identified. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, NOBIS ENGINEERING, INC. Alyssa Epstein Timothy Carr, LEP Staff Scientist Senior Project Manager O:\ACTIVE\91730.00 - LEP SERVICES AT FARIA CORP MONTVILLE CT\91730.02 - HBMA SURVEY\HBMA REPORT - FARIA BEEDE PROPERTY UNCASVILLE CT - NOBIS 10-5-2016.DOCX HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 1 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Site Description ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Inspection Survey Limitations ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS (ACM) SURVEY ........................................................... 1 2.1 Observations ..................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Asbestos Sampling Results .............................................................................................. 2 2.2.1 Thermal System Insulation .................................................................................... 2 2.2.2 Vinyl Floor Tile ....................................................................................................... 3 2.2.3 Roofing Materials ................................................................................................... 3 2.2.4 Miscellaneous Materials ......................................................................................... 3 3.2.5 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials ...................................................................... 4 3.0 LEAD PAINT SURVEY ................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 XRF Identification of LBP .................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Shallow Soil Sampling for Lead ........................................................................................ 5 3.3 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 5 4.0 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) ................................................................................. 6 4.1 PCB Sample Collection and Analyses .............................................................................. 6 4.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 7 5.0 MISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS ........................................................ 8 5.1 Abandoned Aboveground Fuel Oil Tank .......................................................................... 8 5.2 Fluorescent Light Tubes ................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Fluorescent Light Ballasts ................................................................................................. 8 5.4 Other Items ....................................................................................................................... 8 6.0 PRELIMINARY ABATEMENT COSTS & CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................... 9 6.1 Asbestos Abatement Costs .............................................................................................. 9 6.2 Lead Paint Abatement and Management ......................................................................... 9 6.2.1 Lead in Paint .......................................................................................................... 9 6.2.2 Lead in Soil .......................................................................................................... 10 6.3 Removal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls ........................................................................... 10 6.4 Removal of Fluorescent Light Fixtures ........................................................................... 11 6.5 Removal and Disposal of Other Building Materials ........................................................ 11 7.0 LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 12 TABLES TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS SAMPLING AND ANALYSES TABLE 2 LEAD PAINT XRF SCREENING RESULTS TABLE 3 PCB ANALYSES TABLE 4 FLUORESCENT LIGHT INVENTORY TABLE 5 ESTIMATED ASBESTOS ABATEMENT COSTS FIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE LOCUS FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 ASBESTOS LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT APPENDIX 2 LEAD XRF SCREENING APPENDIX 3 LEAD AND PCB SAMPLE ANALYTICAL REPORT HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 1 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background This Preliminary Hazardous Building Materials Assessment (HBMA) summarizes the means, methods, and results from a hazardous building materials survey of the Faria Beede facility, located at 42 Pink Row in Uncasville, Connecticut (Site). Nobis understands that Dakota Partners is evaluating the property for purchase and subsequent redevelopment as residential apartments. Our objective was to assess the industrial facility for hazardous building materials which would require proper in-place management and/or abatement and disposal as part of repurposing the building. 1.2 Site Description A Site Locus map is included as Figure 1. A Site Plan showing the overview of the property and building designations is included as Figure 2 The seven-acre Faria property includes a 100,000 square-foot manufacturing, warehouse and distribution operation located in eleven buildings. The facility was initially constructed as a woolen mill in the 19th century with construction of additional buildings over time prior to Faria’s purchase of the property in 1964. Since 1964, the buildings have been used for the manufacture of analog and digital engine monitoring instruments used in a variety of marine, military, construction and related equipment. Given the age of the structures, the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead paint, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and other hazardous building materials (e.g. fluorescent light tubes, light ballasts potentially containing PCBs, battery containing exit signs, and fire extinguishers) is likely. Our objective was to assess the building for Hazardous Building Materials (HBMs) which would require proper management and disposal prior to initiating building renovations. 1.3 Inspection Survey Limitations Because Faria Beede had on-going operations that required the use and storage of chemicals and hazardous materials, we did not assess or otherwise itemize chemicals and equipment owned by Faria. The degree and extent of renovation and repurposing of the buildings has not been determined. Therefore, this should be considered a screening level survey of building materials which were considered most likely to be disturbed during renovation activities (e.g. flooring, ceiling tiles, and representative wall systems). The survey concentrated on building materials which might result in significant cost to abate (relic heating systems and thermal system insulation and PCB sealants). In general, sampling was not performed on building materials which were physically intact, enclosed or inaccessible such as in wall spaces, ceiling plenums or confined spaces. 2.0 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS (ACM) SURVEY A building material is considered a regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) if it contains greater than 1% asbestos1. The survey included both suspect friable ACMs and non-friable ACMs. A friable ACM is defined as easily crushable or reduced to powder by hand pressure 1 Asbestos-containing materials are defined as containing greater than 1% asbestos by weight (RCSA 19a-332a-1). HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 2 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut such as ceiling tiles, sheetrock, plaster, thermal system insulation. Non-friable ACMs include roofing, floor tiles, mastics, and joint compound. Connecticut regulations require that multiple samples be collected from homogeneous areas identified throughout the facility to identify asbestos content in suspect ACM. Suspect ACM is identified by a Connecticut-licensed Asbestos Inspector. Homogeneous areas consist of areas that appear to be similar in material color, texture, and date of installation or application. Each set of homogeneous bulk samples is analyzed using the “positive-stop” procedure. According to this procedure, analysis of additional duplicate samples collected from homogeneous areas or materials is not required if asbestos is detected in any one of the samples from the homogeneous group. Connecticut-certified asbestos inspector Alyssa Epstein (Inspector No. 946) collected 228 bulk samples from areas of suspect ACM identified during the survey. Samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) “Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Material”; EPA/600/R- 93/116 (July 1993). Bulk samples were transmitted under a chain-of-custody to EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL is an accredited Connecticut-certified laboratory located in Wallingford, Connecticut. 2.1 Observations Mr. Brian Cofone, Facilities Manager, reported that asbestos abatement of pipe insulation had been previously performed. Based on the observations made during our survey, the abatement of friable asbestos insulation appears to have been fairly complete. No exterior thermal system insulation was observed on the low pressure gas-fired steam boiler located in Building M-6 and associated heating pipes and tanks. Where observed, insulation on pipes consisted of fiberglass or neoprene foam. Fiberglass is classified as a non-ACM and sampling to confirm the non-regulated nature of fiberglass is not required. Mr. Cofone reported that the only known ACM he was aware of was transite board (asbestos-cement board), surrounding the freight elevator shaft in building M-4. No spray-on fireproofing was observed on structural steel or roof deck components of the building. 2.2 Asbestos Sampling Results A total of 200 samples suspected of containing asbestos were selected for analysis by EMSL using Polarized Light Microscopy and Dispersion Staining. Laboratory data sheets are included in Appendix 1 and laboratory results of sample analyses are summarized on Table 1. Photographs of various materials are attached. 2.2.1 Thermal System Insulation Very little thermal system insulation was observed through the buildings. One approximately 75-foot length of insulated steam pipe was observed along the west wall of the Building M-14 cafeteria, as follows: HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 3 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut Sample ID Sample Location Total Asbestos (%) Asbestos Type TSI-1A Pipe insulation along west wall of cafeteria, near ceiling 5 Chrysotile 2.2.2 Vinyl Floor Tile The majority of the floor surfacing consisted of bare concrete or original wood floors. Some carpeting and vinyl flooring was observed in various office areas. The following vinyl floor tiles were found to be ACM: Sample ID Sample Location Total Asbestos (%) Asbestos Type FT-4A- Floor Tile Green Floor Tile under Carpet in Offices Off of the Cafeteria in Building M-12. 3 FT-4A-Floor Tile FT-6A Mint Green Floor Tile Under Carpet Room IE Off Cafeteria 4 FT-6A FT-8A- Floor Tile Beige 1x1 Floor Tile Under Carpet IE Room Off Cafeteria 3 FT-8A-Floor Tile FT-13A Beige 1x1 Floor Tile under Carpet M8 First Floor Rear Right Office 2 FT-13A FT-17A Beige 1x1 Tile M-7 Second Floor Women's Room 5 FT-17A FT-21A Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-7 Second Floor First Office on the Right 2 FT-21A FT-23A Mint Green 1x1 Tile M-7 Loading Dock Landing 4 FT-23A 2.2.3 Roofing Materials The majority of the mill buildings have low pitched membrane roofs. In general, the membrane roofing appeared to be relatively new and in reasonably good condition. Mr. Cofone reported that the roofing was less than 10 years old. Due to the apparent good condition, very little sampling was performed of roofing materials. Some buildings had shingled dormers which appeared to need replacement. Accessible roofing materials were sampled on multiple buildings on-Site. Two samples analyzed were found to be ACM as follows: Sample ID Sample Location Total Asbestos (%) Asbestos Type R-5A Roof Flashing Cement Black between Buildings M-4 and M-11 8 Chrysotile R-11A Roof Shingle Paper w/9A 5 Chrysotile 2.2.4 Miscellaneous Materials A variety of other building materials were sampled for asbestos and the following were found to be ACM: Sample ID Sample Location Total Asbestos (%) Asbestos Type S-5B White Exterior Window Glazing Boiler House 4 Chrysotile S-6A White Exterior Window Caulking Boiler House 8 Chrysotile HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 4 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut Sample ID Sample Location Total Asbestos (%) Asbestos Type S-15A-Caulk Caulking on Brick M-8 Inner Door 12 Chrysotile S-27A Grey Sealant w/R-9 8 Chrysotile S-29A Yellow Window to Brick Caulking M-10 - M-13 Courtyard 4 Chrysotile W-3A Transite Board Building M-4 Fifth Floor Elevator Shaft 20 Chrysotile W-7A Transite Board Building M-4 Elevator Shaft 25 Chrysotile 3.2.5 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials Review of the asbestos laboratory results summarized on Table 1 and provided in Appendix 1 indicates numerous samples that did not contain asbestos. These samples included cove base and cove base glue, wall board, wall board joint compound, ceiling tiles, carpet glue, newer window glazing and caulking. 3.0 LEAD PAINT SURVEY On September 27, 2016, a screening level X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) survey was conducted by Joyce Morin of Boston Lead Company in Middletown, Connecticut (Connecticut Lead Inspector License No. 002209). The screening level lead survey included non-destructive XRF testing of representative painted surfaces and other building materials throughout accessible interior and exterior areas of the buildings. This was a screening level, pre- renovation survey of a historic industrial mill building. The objective of the survey was to identify the degree and extent of lead in paint for the purposes of planning renovation activities. A Thermos Scientific™ Niton™ XLp 300 Series XRF instrument was used in general accordance with Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Chapter 7 Guidelines for Lead Based Paint Inspection, 1997 Revision. The XRF instrument used for the survey is designed to analyze the paint layers and not the substrate material (metal, wood, concrete, etc.) and does not require substrate correction. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) is defined as any paint, surface coating that contains lead equal to or exceeding one milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or 0.5% by weight. Lead Containing Paint (LCP) is defined as having any detectable lead content. A summary of the XRF testing results where LBP was identified are summarized on Table 2. The results of all the XRF test results are included in Appendix 2. 3.1 XRF Identification of LBP Lead paint was identified in all of the buildings. In general, LBP has been applied over significant areas of the building interiors including brick, plaster, concrete, wood beams and columns, wood bead board, metal hand rails, and steel trusses. Fewer exterior building components are leaded. Original wood soffits, windows, and doors should be presumed to be coated with LBP. Many exterior replacement windows have been installed. The original LBP coated window frames remain in most cases, enclosed by aluminum flashing. In many cases, the LBP was peeling and flaking, particularly where is has been applied to wood surfaces. HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 5 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut The results can best be summarized by identifying that remaining original windows and exterior doors, window framing, soffits, fascia, interior green, blue, and white painted brick, concrete, foundation stone, wood columns and wood support beams have LBP. Newer partition walls made of sheetrock do not have LBP. 3.2 Shallow Soil Sampling for Lead Three shallow composite soil samples were collected from the upper 3-inches of soil within the courtyard formed by Buildings M-10A, M-12, and M-13. Sample locations are shown on Figure 2. The samples were collected near the base of the building foundations, below where lead paint was present on exterior window frames, soffits and fascias. The ground surface in these areas consisted of a mixture of sand, gravel, and topsoil with some vegetation. Three shallow soil samples were submitted to Phoenix Environmental Laboratories of Manchester, Connecticut (Phoenix) for analysis of total lead. The laboratory results are attached in Appendix 3 and can be summarized as follows: Remedial Standard (mg/kg) Sample Designation and Result (mg/kg) LEAD-1 LEAD-2 LEAD-3 I/C DEC R DEC 1,000 400 876 1,590 796 Total lead in all three soil samples exceeded the Residential Direct Exposure Criteria (R-DEC) of 400 mg/kg. Sample “LEAD-2” exceeded the Industrial/Commercial Direct Exposure Criteria (I/C-DEC) of 1,000 mg/kg. 3.3 Recommendations LBP was identified on original windows and exterior doors, window framing, soffits, fascia, interior green, blue, and white painted brick, concrete, foundation stone, wood columns and wood support beams. Based on the proposed use of the buildings as apartments, residential regulatory requirements for LBP apply. The HUD Lead-Safe Housing Regulation requires different types of both evaluation and controls of LBP, depending on the amount of federal funding allocated to the project, per unit. These requirements are as follows: a. For renovation costs up to $5,000 per unit, a work site only evaluation or assumption of lead based paint is required and lead safe work practices (as required by state and federal agencies) and site clearance by a state licensed lead project monitor must be used. b. For renovation costs from $5,000 to $25,000 per unit, a risk assessment must be done on the entire property and lead-safe work practice must be used to correct all lead-based paint, dust and soil hazards. Clearance inspections and sampling are required at the end of the lead-safe work. c. For renovation costs of $25,000 per unit and above, a risk assessment and/or inspection must be done on the entire property and abatement methods must be used and performed by a lead abatement contractor. Clearance is required at the end of lead abatement. HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 6 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut In lieu of a risk assessment or lead inspection, it must be “presumed” that all painted surfaces are lead-based paint and all deteriorating surfaces must be corrected using lead-safe work practices or abatement. Non-metal solid waste debris generated from renovations will require testing to demonstrate that it is not a characteristically hazardous waste due to extractable lead using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). Scrap metal for recycling is not considered a solid waste per federal regulations 40 CFR 261.4(a) (13). Metal building components, if any, should be recycled at a permitted metal recycling facility. 4.0 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) Certain sealants used as part of standard construction practices for masonry buildings and concrete structures erected between the 1950’s and late 1970’s are known to have been manufactured with PCBs. Production and use of PCBs was halted in the United States in the late 1970s. The EPA regulates the disposal of caulk and other building sealants, particularly if the concentration of PCBs exceeds 50 parts per million (ppm). Such materials are classified as PCB-contaminated product waste and must be disposed in accordance with EPA regulations 40 CFR Part 761.3. Remedial activities to remove and dispose of this material must adhere to EPA regulations under 40 CFR 761. Materials containing PCBs in excess of 1 ppm, but less than 50 ppm must adhere to Regulations for Connecticut State Agencies Sections 22a- 463 through 22a-469. Per the state Remediation Standard Regulations, the risk-based Residential Direct Exposure Criterion or R-DEC is 1,000 µg/kg or ppb. The Industrial/Commercial Direct Exposure Criterion in 10,000 µg/kg or ppb. The I/C-DEC is 10,000 µg/kg or ppb. Since the proposed use of the Site is for residential purposes, the target criterion is 1,000 µg/kg or ppb. 4.1 PCB Sample Collection and Analyses Twenty samples consisting of window caulking, window glazing, paint, and shallow soil on or adjacent to two transformer pads were analyzed by Phoenix for PCBs using EPA Method 8082 with Soxhlet extraction. The results are summarized on Table 3. The laboratory report is included in Appendix 3. Sample descriptions and analytical results are summarized as follows: Sample Designation Sample Location Description Total PCBs (µg/kg or ppb) PCB-1 Black window to wall caulking fifth floor Bldg. M-4 3,500 PCB-2 Brown window sealant fifth floor Bldg. M-4 2,100 PCB-3 Black window glazing fifth floor Bldg. M-4 1,400 PCB-4 Black shiny window caulking fourth floor Bldg. M-4 1,000 PCB-5 White paint fourth floor Bldg. M-4 None Detected PCB-6 Green paint fourth floor Bldg. M-4 2,700 PCB-7 White exterior window glazing Bldg. M-6 (boiler house) None Detected PCB-8 White brick coating underneath cafeteria window None Detected HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 7 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut Sample Designation Sample Location Description Total PCBs (µg/kg or ppb) PCB-9 Yellow wood to brick caulking first floor computer room Bldg. M-8 None Detected PCB-10 White wood to wood caulking first floor Bldg. M-8 bathroom 1,800 PCB-11 White exterior door caulking outer door Bldg. M-8 None Detected PCB-12 Floor to wall caulking first floor Bldg. M-7 640 PCB-13 Bldgs. M-10A, M-12, M-13 courtyard soil on transformer concrete pad None Detected PCB-14 Bldgs. M-10A, M-12, M-13 courtyard soil surrounding transformer concrete pad None Detected PCB-15 Bldgs. M-10A, M-12, M-13 courtyard yellow window to brick caulking None Detected PCB-16 Bldgs. M-10A, M-12, M-13 courtyard black matte window caulking 500 PCB-17 Soil south of transformer cage next to the Power House (Bldg. M-14) None Detected PCB-18 White paint Bldg. M-11 None Detected PCB-19 Blue paint over green paint Bldg. M-11 None Detected PCB-20 Beige and white paint third floor Bldg. M-4 3,500 PCBs were detected in nine of the twenty samples analyzed. The maximum concentration of PCBs detected was 3,500 µg/kg in samples PCB-1 (black caulk in Building M-4) and PCB-20 (beige paint in Building M-4). Samples PCB-1, PCB-2, PCB-3, PCB-6, PCB-10, and PCB-20 are classified as PCB- containing at concentrations in excess of 1,000 µg/kg. Samples PCB-5, PCB-6, PCB-8, PCB-18, PCB-19 and PCB-20 consisted of paint. Of the six paint samples, PCBs exceeding 1,000 ug/kg were identified in samples PCB-6 (green interior wall paint on the fourth floor of Building M-4) and PCB-20 (beige interior wall paint in Building M-4). Low concentrations of PCBs, below 1,000 ug/kg, were detected in samples PCB-12 and PCB-16. Neither of these samples exceeded applicable remedial criteria. 4.2 Recommendations Of the twenty samples analyzed, PCBs were detected above 1,000 µg/kg in six samples. The highest concentration detected was 3,500 µg/kg. Unless additional testing is performed, we recommend assuming all older caulking and glazing materials will require management and disposal as PCB-contaminated materials (less than 50,000 µg/kg). The glazing was also identified as ACM. The presence of PCBs in paint may complicate disposal of lead paint debris from abatement activities. In addition, the enclosure of surfaces containing PCBs greater than the residential standard (1,000 ug/kg) may require EPA approval. HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 8 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut Remedial activities to remove and dispose of building materials must adhere to EPA regulations under 40 CFR 761. Materials containing PCBs in excess of 1,000 µg/kg, but less than 50,000 µg/kg must adhere to Regulations for Connecticut State Agencies Sections 22a- 463 through 22a-469. 5.0 MISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS Other hazardous building materials which were inventoried, as summarized below. 5.1 Abandoned Aboveground Fuel Oil Tank An abandoned approximately 10,000-gallon aboveground fuel oil storage tank is located east of the Boiler House (Building M-6). The tank is located inside a roofed enclosure which has a concrete containment. Fuel oil is no longer used. Mr. Cofone, Facilities Manager, reportedly was told that the aboveground tank contains a significant quantity of petroleum sludge. This building is slated to be removed as part of redevelopment. Costs for removal and disposal of the petroleum sludge and aboveground tank system will need to be prepared. 5.2 Fluorescent Light Tubes A total of approximately 800 fluorescent light fixtures were identified in the buildings. As summarized on Table 4, this includes estimated quantities of the different fixture types that were observed including: open and covered fixtures, fixtures containing two or four bulbs; and fixtures containing various bulbs lengths (typically 2 ft. and 4 ft.), and fixtures containing U- shaped bulbs. With approximately 800 fixtures observed, we estimate about 1,800 fluorescent light tubes are potentially located within the building. The fluorescent light tubes should be removed without breakage, boxed, transported and appropriately disposed/recycled as Universal Hazardous Wastes due to the presence of mercury. 5.3 Fluorescent Light Ballasts In accordance with convention, fluorescent light ballasts which are not marked with respect to PCB content are typically assumed to contain PCBs. Ballasts which are marked as “Non- PCB” and can be assumed to be free of PCBs. All PCB-containing fluorescent ballasts which are removed as part of renovation activities should be disposed according to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requirements. We could not access large areas of installed lighting to inventory the number of PCB- containing light ballasts. Older light fixtures (with assumed PCB ballasts) and circular lighting fixtures (with assumed non-PCB electronic ballasts) were observed throughout the buildings. As a conservative measure, we have assumed that all fixtures contained PCB-containing light ballasts. We estimate that at least 800 ballasts, many of which are PCB-containing, are present. 5.4 Other Items Emergency exit fixtures and emergency lights contain lead acid batteries as a power source were observed in various places throughout the buildings. Approximately 30 emergency exit signs and 30 emergency lights were estimated to be present and must be maintained in compliance with fire codes. HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 9 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut 6.0 PRELIMINARY ABATEMENT COSTS & CONSIDERATIONS The following potential abatement costs and considerations are provided on the basis of the HBMA results summarized above. Additional sampling analysis and evaluation of the scope of building improvements are required in order to provide more definitive abatement costs. 6.1 Asbestos Abatement Costs Abatement activities must be conducted in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations and protocols, and by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor. A Connecticut- certified Asbestos Project Monitor must provide abatement oversight, background/ambient air sampling, a final visual inspection, and final clearance air sampling during and at the completion of abatement activities. The estimated quantities of asbestos and our estimate of associated abatement costs are included on Table 5. Based on the amounts of asbestos identified and the assumptions presented in this report, our abatement estimate is in the range of $89,000. The abatement cost includes removal and disposal of the identified ACMs. It does not include replacement. Contractor estimates are strongly recommended to determine the best means, methods and actual costs for asbestos abatement. In addition, renovation activities can enclose certain ACMs such as vinyl flooring. Enclosing non-friable ACM is an acceptable practice provided the ACM remains undisturbed and would not incur the same cost as abatement. 6.2 Lead Paint Abatement and Management Lead paint has been applied over large areas of the building interiors. We have assumed that the extensive renovations required to meet code requirements for residential purposes will involve extensive gutting of existing non-structural building elements. Structural portions of the buildings to remain can be deleaded using physical or chemical stripper. We have assumed significant areas of leaded paint will be managed by enclosure. Bulky wastes generated by demolition will be subject to some testing to document that the debris it not a characteristically hazardous waste due to lead. Therefore, periodic composite samples of representative debris for testing of extractable lead by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) is recommended. 6.2.1 Lead in Paint The U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) dictates the majority of requirements and risk-based targets governing lead-safe practices. According to Ms. Penelope Craig of Boston Lead (Lead Risk Assessor License No. 002104), the project will require a Lead Hazard Control Plan and Lead Management Plan. These plans should be incorporated with the planned renovations of the buildings and subsequent management of the facility, once occupied. Based on conversations with licensed contractors, typical lead paint abatement costs can range from $8 to $20 per square foot. This assumes using negative pressure containment systems and pressure controlled shot blasting using coal slag (e.g. Black Beauty) or walnut shells. The Farrow System® should also be considered, particularly for stripping wooden beams. Lead paint removal should be evaluated in test areas to make sure the treated surfaces pass the required lead standard and that the substrate does not get physically damaged by the blasting process. HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 10 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut Lead-safe practices can be employed to allow the enclosure of leaded surfaces which then prevents contact and exposure. Enclosure and management of in- place leaded surfaces should be conducted in accordance with a Lead Management Plan. Under a management plan, periodic inspections will be required by a licensed lead inspector to evaluate the presence of exposed chipping or peeling lead paint. Lead wipe test dust results are compared to the clearance criteria specified by the Connecticut Department of Health and Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as follows: Wipe Sample Area Clearance Criterion Floors 40 µg/ft2 Window Sill 250 µg/ft2 Window Wells 400 µg/ft2 All corrective measures and/or abatement must be performed by a qualified abatement contractor. The degree and extent of lead paint abatement cannot be determined until the extent of renovations and building alterations is known. 6.2.2 Lead in Soil As summarized in Section 4.2, three shallow samples of soil located at the base of the foundations exceeded the state’s Residential Direct Exposure Criterion (R-DEC) for total lead of 400 mg/kg. One sample exceeded the Industrial/Commercial DEC of 1,000 mg/kg. It is presumed that the lead identified in the soil samples is from flaking lead paint from window frames, soffits and fascia boards and not from industrial activities. Removal or capping with clean fill will be required to make the soils comply with HUD requirements. Due to the limited sampling, the extent of lead impacts to soil is unclear and further sampling and analyses is recommended 6.3 Removal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls Low levels of PCBs were identified in caulking, glazing and paint. Two samples contained PCBs at 3,500 ug/kg which exceeded the Residential Direct Exposure Criterion of 1,000 ug/kg. No samples exceeded the Industrial/Commercial DEC of 10,000 ug/kg. Disposal of materials containing PCBs in excess of 1 ppm (or 1,000 ppb), but less than 50 ppm (or 50,000 ppb) must adhere to state regulations (Regulations for Connecticut State Agencies Sections 22a- 463 through 22a-469). We have assumed that removal of PCBs in glazing and caulking will be accomplished as part of the renovations and replacement of windows and doors. PCB product waste in excess of 1,000 ug/kg must be removed, stored and disposed separately at a permitted facility. HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 11 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut Samples PCB-5, PCB-6, PCB-8, PCB-18, PCB-19 and PCB-20 consisted of paint which is also presumed to be leaded. Of the six paint samples, PCBs exceeding 1,000 ug/kg were identified in samples PCB-6 (green interior wall paint on the fourth floor of Building M-4) and PCB-20 (beige interior wall paint in Building M-4). The presence of PCBs in paint in Building M-4 should be further evaluated. An approval may be required from the EPA to allow PCB-containing material to remain in excess of the residential standard. Alternatively, the paint could be removed as part of lead paint abatement. The cost for disposal of lead paint abatement debris may be effected by the presence of PCBs. Potentially, this issue is limited to Building M-4. Additional testing of PCBs in paint is warranted to ensure that the degree and extent of impact is documented. 6.4 Removal of Fluorescent Light Fixtures The removal of Universal Hazardous Waste mercury-containing fluorescent light tubes and PCB ballasts at this Site is a large job requiring coordinated electrical work, removal of regulated light tubes and ballasts from approximately 800 fixtures, packaging of the light tubes, sorting of PCB from non-PCB ballasts, and proper disposal of these items. We note that this work would be required as part of the facility renovation. Therefore, the added cost for disposal/recycling of the regulated PCB ballasts and mercury light tubes is estimated to be in the range of $45,000. This cost estimate does not include labor to remove or replace the light fixtures. 6.5 Removal and Disposal of Other Building Materials A 10,000-gallon aboveground fuel oil storage tank (AST) is located inside of a vault in Building M-6. The AST reportedly contains significant quantity of sludge. The tank is no longer used and slated for removal as part of development. For the purposes of this estimate, we anticipate that removal of the petroleum sludge and tank system should be in the range of $25,000. It is unclear whether this cost should be paid by Faria. HBMA of Faria Beede Facility Page 12 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut 7.0 LIMITATIONS The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the presence of asbestos, PCB, and other hazardous materials present in the subject building. Reasonable efforts were made to locate and sample suspect materials and document all above-mentioned materials. For any building, the existence of unique or concealed ACM or other hazardous material and debris is a possibility. There may be other non-accessible materials above ceilings, behind walls, and below floors that only become evident during renovations or demolition activities. Nobis Engineering does not warrant, guarantee, or profess to have the ability to locate or identify all ACM or other hazardous materials in the buildings. The intent of the report is for using it to plan the renovation and demolition of buildings surveyed. All quantities of materials identified in this report will have to be field verified by contractors prior to submitting bids to perform abatement work. Additional confirmatory sampling and detailed quantification may be required if demolition uncovers additional suspect materials. Nobis Engineering provided these services consistent with the level and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently providing similar services under similar circumstances at the time the services were provided. This statement is in lieu of others either expressed or implied. TABLES Client Sample Sample Location Asbestos Concentration (%) Asbestos Type Material Classification Friable? (Y/N) FT-4A-Floor Tile Green Floor Tile under Carpet In Offices Off Cafeteria 3 Chrysotile ACM N FT-6A Mint Green Floor Tile Under Carpet Room IE Off Cafeteria 4 Chrysotile ACM N FT-8A-Floor Tile Beige 1x1 Floor Tile Under Carpet IE Room Off Cafeteria 3 Chrysotile ACM N FT-13A Beige 1x1 Floor Tile under Carpet M8 First Floor Rear Right Office 2 Chrysotile ACM N FT-17A Beige 1x1 Tile M-7 Second Floor Women's Room 5 Chrysotile ACM N FT-21A Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-7 Second Floor First Office on the Right 2 Chrysotile ACM N FT-23A Mint Green 1x1 Tile M-7 Loading Dock Landing 4 Chrysotile ACM N R-5A Roof Flashing Cement Black between M-4 and M-11 8 Chrysotile ACM N R-11A Roof Shingle Paper w/9A 5 Chrysotile ACM N S-5B White Exterior Window Glazing Boiler House 4 Chrysotile ACM N S-6A White Exterior Window Caulking Boiler House 8 Chrysotile ACM Y S-15A-Caulk Caulking on Brick M-8 Inner Door 12 Chrysotile ACM N S-27A Grey Sealant w/R-9 8 Chrysotile ACM N S-29A Yellow Window to Brick Caulking M-10A, M-12, and M- 13 Courtyard 4 Chrysotile ACM N TSI-1A Pipe Insulation Cafeteria 5 Chrysotile ACM N W-3A Grey Sheetrock M-4 Fifth Floor Elevator Shaft 20 Chrysotile ACM Y W-7A Transite Board M-4 Elevator Shaft 25 Chrysotile ACM N C-1A White Ceiling Plaster above Wood Boards M-4 5th Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM N C-1B White Ceiling Plaster above Wood Boards M-4 5th Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable C-2A Wormy Ceiling Tile 2'x4' Boiler House Office ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable C-2B Wormy Ceiling Tile 2'x4' Boiler House Office ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable C-4A 2x4 Wormy Ceiling Tile First Aid Room Off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable C-4B 2x4 Wormy Ceiling Tile First Aid Room Off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable C-5A 1x1 Ceiling Tile Loft Office Above Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable C-5B 1x1 Ceiling Tile Loft Office Above Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-1A-Floor Tile Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Dark Blue Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-1A-Mastic Mastic with FT-1A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-1B-Floor Tile Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Dark Blue Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-1B-Mastic Mastic with FT-1A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-2A-Floor Tile Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Light Blue Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-2A-Mastic Mastic With FT-2A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-2B-Floor Tile Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Light Blue Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-2B-Mastic Mastic With FT-2B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-3A-Floor Tile Royal Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-3A-Mastic Mastic with FT-3A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-3B-Floor Tile Royal Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-3B-Mastic Mastic with FT-3A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-4A-Mastic Mastic with FT-4A <1 Chrysotile Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-4B-Floor Tile Green Floor Tile under Carpet In Offices Off Cafeteria Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-4B-Mastic Mastic with FT-4A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-5A Yellow Carpet Mastic In Offices Off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-5B Yellow Carpet Mastic In Offices Off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-6B Mint Green Floor Tile Under Carpet Room IE Off Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-7A-Floor Tile Sea Green Tile under Carpet Processing Office ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ANALYSES FARIA BEEDE HBMA SURVEY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT 1 of 5 Client Sample Sample Location Asbestos Concentration (%) Asbestos Type Material Classification Friable? (Y/N) TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ANALYSES FARIA BEEDE HBMA SURVEY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT FT-7A-Mastic Mastic with FT-7A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-7B-Floor Tile Sea Green Tile under Carpet Processing Office ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-7B-Mastic Mastic with FT-7B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-8A-Mastic Mastic with FT-8A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-8B-Floor Tile Beige 1x1 Floor Tile Under Carpet IE Room Off Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-8B-Leveler Leveler with FT-8B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-8B-Mastic Mastic with FT-8B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-9A-Floor Tile Sky Blue Floor Tile 1x1 Mens Room off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-9A-Mastic Yellow Mastic with FT-9A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-9B-Floor Tile Sky Blue Floor Tile 1x1 Mens Room off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-9B-Mastic Yellow Mastic with FT-9B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-10A Blue 1x1 Floor Tile in M-8 1st Floor Bathroom ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-10B Blue 1x1 Floor Tile in M-8 1st Floor Bathroom ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-11A Yellow Mastic w/10A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-11B Yellow Mastic w/10B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-12A Brown Mastic w/10A Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-12B Brown Mastic w/10B Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-13B Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-8 First Floor Rear Lab Area Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-13C Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-8 Second Floor Men's Room Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-13D Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-8 - M-7 Second Floor Building Connector Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-14A Brown Mastic w/13A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-14B Brown Mastic w/13B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-14C Brown Mastic w/13C ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-14D Brown Mastic w/13D ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-15A Flooring M-7 Second Floor Utility Room ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-15B Flooring M-7 Second Floor Utility Room ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-16A Black Mastic w/15A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-16B Black Mastic w/15B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-17B Beige 1x1 Tile M-7 Second Floor Women's Room Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-18A Brown Mastic w/17A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-18B Brown Mastic w/17B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-19A Brown 1x1 Floor Tile M-7 Raised Computer Room 2nd Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-19B Brown 1x1 Floor Tile M-7 Raised Computer Room 2nd Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-20A Black Mastic w/19A Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-20B Black Mastic w/19B Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-21B Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-7 Second Floor First Office on the Right Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-22A Black Mastic w/21A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-22B Black Mastic w/21B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-23B Mint Green 1x1 Tile M-7 Loading Dock Landing Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable FT-24A Black Mastic w/23A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-24B Black Mastic w/23B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-25A Off White 1x1 Floor Tile First Floor M7 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-25B Off White 1x1 Floor Tile First Floor M8 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-26A Brown Mastic w/25A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable FT-26B Brown Mastic w/25B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-10A Roof Shingle Tar w/9A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-1A Roof Shingle M-4 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable 2 of 5 Client Sample Sample Location Asbestos Concentration (%) Asbestos Type Material Classification Friable? (Y/N) TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ANALYSES FARIA BEEDE HBMA SURVEY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT R-1B Roof Shingle M-4 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-2A Roof Shingle Tar M-4 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-2B Roof Shingle Tar M-4 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-3A-Paper Paper M-8 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-3A-Roof Roof Shingle M-8 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-3A-Tar Tar M-8 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-3B-Paper Paper M-8 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-3B-Roof Roof Shingle M-8 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-3B-Tar Tar M-8 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-4A Black Electrical Conduit Riser Flashing Cement M-10 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-6A Green Roof Shingle AST Roof ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-6B Green Roof Shingle AST Roof ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-7A Roof Shingle Tar w/6A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-7B Roof Shingle Tar w/6B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-8A Roof Shingle Paper w/6A Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable R-8B Roof Shingle Paper w/6B Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable R-9A Brown Roof Patch middle Stick up AST Roof Shingle ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-9B Brown Roof Patch middle Stick up AST Roof Shingle ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-10B Roof Shingle Tar w/9B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-11B Roof Shingle Paper w/9B Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable R-12A Red Roof Shingle South Side M-8 Dog House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-12B Red Roof Shingle South Side M-8 Dog House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-13A Tar w/12A Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable R-13B Tar w/12B Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable R-14A White Roof Shingle South Side M-8 Dog House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-14B White Roof Shingle South Side M-8 Dog House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-15A Tar w/14A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable R-15B Tar w/14B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-1A Black Window to Wall Caulking M-4 Fifth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-1B Black Window to Wall Caulking M-4 Fifth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-1C Black Window to Wall Caulking M-4 Fifth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-1D Black Window to Wall Caulking M-5 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-1E Black Window to Wall Caulking M-7 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-2A Brown Window Sealant M-4 Fifth Floor Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable S-3A Black Window Glazing M-4 Fifth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-3B Black Window Glazing M-4 Fifth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-3C Black Window Glazing M-5 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-3D Black Glazing Window M-7 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-4A Brown Window Caulking M-4 Fourth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-4B Brown Window Caulking M-4 Fourth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-5A White Exterior Window Glazing Boiler House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-6B White Exterior Window Caulking Boiler House Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable S-7A-Cove Base Blue Cove Base Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-7A-Mastic Mastic with S-7A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-7B-Cove Base Blue Cove Base Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-7B-Mastic Mastic with S-7B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-8A Mortar between Rock Walls Exterior M-4 Second Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-9A Slop Sink to Floor Caulking Men's Room Off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-9B Slop Sink to Floor Caulking Men's Room Off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-10A Slop Sink to Wall Caulking Mens Room Off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-10B Slop Sink to Wall Caulking Mens Room Off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable 3 of 5 Client Sample Sample Location Asbestos Concentration (%) Asbestos Type Material Classification Friable? (Y/N) TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ANALYSES FARIA BEEDE HBMA SURVEY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT S-11A Carpet Glue M-8 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-11B Carpet Glue M-8 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-12A White Wood to Wood Caulking M-8 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-12B White Wood to Wood Caulking M-8 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-12C White Wood to Wood Caullking M-7 Second Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-13A Yellow Wood to Brick Caulking M-8 First Floor Computer Room ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-13B Yellow Wood to Brick Caulking M-8 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-14A White Exterior Window Caulking M-8 Front Entrance ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-14B White Exterior Window Caulking M-8 Front Entrance ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-15A-Concrete Concrete M-8 Inner Door Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable S-15B-Caulk Caulking on Brick M-8 Inner Door Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable S-15B-Concrete Concrete M-8 Inner Door Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable S-16A White Caulk M-8 Outer Door Frame to Brick ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-16B White Caulk M-8 Outer Door Frame to Brick ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-16C White Caulk M-8 Outer Door Frame to Brick ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-17A Brick Caulking M-8 Rear Door to Brick ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-17B Brick Caulking M-8 Rear Door to Brick ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-18A Caulk around Toilet Base M-7 Second Floor Women's ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-18B Caulk around Toilet Base M-7 Second Floor Women's ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-19A Brick Grout M-7 Loading Dock Second Floor Landing ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-19B Brick Grout M-7 Loading Dock Second Floor Landing ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-20A Floor to Wall Caulking M-7 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-20B Floor to Wall Caulking M-7 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-21A White Window to Brick Caulking M-7 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-21B White Window to Brick Caulking M-7 First Floor Foyer ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-22A Window to Wall Caulking M-7 First Floor Office Area ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-22B Window to Wall Caulking M-7 First Floor Office Area ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-23A Green Cove Base M-7 First Floor Office Area ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-23B Green Cove Base M-7 First Floor Office Area ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-24A Yellow Mastic w/23A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-24B Yellow Mastic w/23B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-25A Black Window to Sill Caulking M-7 Exterior Window ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-25B Black Window to Sill Caulking M-7 Exterior Window ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-26A White Window to Brick Exterior Caulking M-7 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-26B White Window to Brick Exterior Caulking M-7 ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-27B Grey Sealant w/R-9 Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable S-28A M-13 - M-10 Courtyard Window to Brick Caulking Matte ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-28B M-13 - M-10 Courtyard Window to Brick Caulking Matte ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-29B Yellow Window to Brick Caulking M-10A, M-12, and M- 13 Courtyard Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable S-30A Old Window White Glazing M-10 - M-13 Exterior ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable S-30B Old Window White Glazing M-10 - M-13 Exterior ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable TSI-1B Pipe Insulation Cafeteria Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable W-1A-Skim Coat Skim Coat With W-1A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-1A-Wall White Wall Plaster M-4 Fourth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-1B-Skim Coat Skim Coat With W-1B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-1B-Wall White Wall Plaster M-4 Fifth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-1C-Skim Coat Skim Coat With W-1C ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-1C-Wall White Horse Hair Wall Plaster M-4 Fourth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-1D-Skim Coat Skim Coat With W-1D ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable 4 of 5 Client Sample Sample Location Asbestos Concentration (%) Asbestos Type Material Classification Friable? (Y/N) TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ANALYSES FARIA BEEDE HBMA SURVEY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT W-1D-Wall White Horse Hair Wall Plaster M-4 Third Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-2A Light Brown Fiberboard M-4A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-2B Light Brown Fiberboard M-4A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-3B Grey Sheetrock M-4 Fifth Floor Elevator Shaft Pos Stop Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable W-4A White Horse Hair Wall Plaster M-4 First Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-5A Grey Wall Knob Grout M-4 Fourth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-6A-Joint Joint Compound M-4 Fourth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-6A-Sheetrock White Sheetrock M-4 Fourth Floor ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-8A Concrete Wall Covering over Brick Boiler House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-8B Concrete Wall Covering over Brick Boiler House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-9A Grey Wallboard Boiler House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-9B-Joint Grey Wallboard Boiler House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-9B-Wallboard Grey Wallboard Boiler House ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-10A White Wallboard Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-10B White Wallboard Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-10C White Wallboard Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-10D White Wallboard First Aid Room Off Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-11A-Plaster Grey Plaster under Window Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-11A-Skim Skim Coat With W-11A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-11B-Plaster Grey Plaster under Window Cafeteria ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-11B-Skim Skim Coat With W-11A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12A-Skim Skim Coat With W-12A ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12A-Wallboard M-8 Office Area ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12B-Skim Skim Coat With W-12B ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12B-Wallboard M-8 Office Area ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12C-Skim Skim Coat With W-12C ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12C-Wallboard M-8 Office Area ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12D-Skim Skim Coat With W-12D ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12D-Wallboard M-8 Utility Closet ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12E-Skim Skim Coat With W-12E ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12E-Wallboard M-7 Second Floor Hallway ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12F-Skim Skim Coat With W-12F ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12F-Wallboard M7 First Floor Office ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-12G-Skim Skim Coat With W-12G Not Analyzed Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable W-12G-Wallboard M-10 Under Cardboard Panels ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-13A Wall Pattern M-7 Second Floor East Hallway Area ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable W-13B Wall Pattern M-7 Second Floor East Hallway Area ND Not Applicable Non-ACM Not Applicable Notes: 1. Bulk samples of building materials were obtained by state licensed inspectors and analyzed by EMSL Analytical located in Wallingford, CT. 5 of 5 Side Room Component Substrate Feature Results PbC (mg/cm2) West Exterior Window Concrete Stool Positive 37.50 West Exterior Wall Brick Wall Positive 3.60 North Exterior Door Wood Casing Positive 3.60 North Exterior Door Wood Door Positive 1.80 North Entry Room Wall Panelling Wall Positive 9.50 North Entry Room Door Wood Casing Positive 3.80 North Entry Room Ceiling Wood Ceiling Positive 16.40 North Entry Room Floor Wood Column Positive 33.70 North Entry Room Floor Wood Column Positive 30.80 East Entry Room Wall Concrete Wall Positive 2.60 East Entry Room Window Wood Casing Positive 27.60 South Stairwell Wall Concrete Wall Positive 2.10 South Stairwell Wall Wood Column Positive 25.60 South Stairwell Ceiling Wood Ceiling Positive 39.00 South Stairwell Stair Wood Upper Trim Positive 35.40 South Stairwell Stair Wood Upper Trim Positive 36.60 West Stairwell Window Wood Casing Positive 32.00 West Stairwell Window Wood Stool Positive 2.60 West Room Floor Wood Column Positive 3.60 East Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 2.70 North Cellar Wall stone Wall Positive 3.30 South Cellar Wall Wood Wall Positive 4.50 East Elevator Area Wall Concrete Wall Positive 1.60 South Elevator Area Wall Brick Wall Positive 2.50 West Basement Door Wood Door Positive 2.20 North Break Room Window Wood Casing Positive 14.80 North Break Room Window Wood Stool Positive 17.10 South Side B Room Window Wood Casing Positive 2.30 South Back Office Window Wood Stool Positive 2.70 South Back Office Window Wood Stool Positive 2.90 North Exterior Upper Crossing Wood Wall Positive 8.30 North Exterior Wall Brick Wall Positive 7.60 North Exterior Window Brick Upper Trim Positive 30.00 Storage - Building M-4 Storage - Building M-4A Building M-5 Boiler/Maintenance - Building M-6 Office - Building M-7 SUMMARY OF LEAD BASED PAINT IDENTIFICATION FARIA BEEDE FACILITY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT TABLE 2 Page 1 of 2 Side Room Component Substrate Feature Results PbC (mg/cm2) SUMMARY OF LEAD BASED PAINT IDENTIFICATION FARIA BEEDE FACILITY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT TABLE 2 North Exterior Ceiling Wood Ceiling Positive 4.50 North Exterior Window Brick Upper Trim Positive 1.20 North Exterior Window Brick Upper Trim Positive 8.90 North Back Room Window Concrete Stool Positive 23.70 South Exterior Window Concrete Stool Positive 1.40 North Exterior Window Wood Stool Positive 2.80 North Exterior Wall Wood Wall Positive 1.20 East Room Wall Wood Wall Positive 3.50 West Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 1.00 South Room Window Wood Upper Trim Positive 1.20 East Room Wall Concrete Wall Positive 2.20 North Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 1.90 North Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 1.40 North Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 2.60 North Room Floor Metal Pipe Positive 18.40 South Room Window Wood Sash Positive 6.20 South Room Window Wood Casing Positive 6.90 South Room Window Wood Stool Positive 7.30 South Basement Wall Brick Wall Positive 1.60 West Basement Wall Brick Wall Positive 15.30 West Basement Window Wood Stool Positive 7.40 West Basement Window Wood Stool Positive 7.70 North Basement Window Wood Sash Positive 4.20 North Basement Window Wood Sash Positive 3.30 Notes: 1. Readings obtained on September 27, 2016 by Joyce Morin ( CT Licensed Lead Inspector #: 002209) of the Boston Lead Company, Middletown, CT. 2. Reading swere obtained using a Thermo Scientific™ Niton™ XLp 300 Series XRF Office Building - Building M-8 Manufacturing - Building M-10 & M-10A Manufacturing - Building M-11 Cafeteria/Offices - Building M-12 Manufacturing - Building M-13 Page 2 of 2 PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCB-1248 PCB-1254 PCB-1260 PCB-1262 PCB-1268 PCB-1 Black window to wall caulking fifth floor M-4 < 2300 < 2300 < 2300 < 2300 3,500 < 2300 < 2300 < 2300 < 2300 3,500 PCB-2 Brown window sealant fifth floor M-4 < 1200 < 1200 < 1200 < 1200 < 1200 2,100 < 1200 < 1200 < 1200 2,100 PCB-3 Black window glazing fifth floor M-4 < 1100 < 1100 < 1100 < 1100 1,400 < 1100 < 1100 < 1100 < 1100 1,400 PCB-4 Black shiny window caulking fourth floor M-4 < 900 < 900 < 900 < 900 1,000 < 900 < 900 < 900 < 900 1,000 PCB-5 White paint fourth floor M-4 < 780 < 780 < 780 < 780 < 780 < 780 < 780 < 780 < 780 No Detected PCB-6 Green paint fourth floor M-4 < 700 < 700 < 700 < 700 < 700 2,700 < 700 < 700 < 700 2,700 PCB-7 White exterior window glazing M-6 (boiler house)< 740 < 740 < 740 < 740 < 740 < 740 < 740 < 740 < 740 No Detected PCB-8 White brick coating underneath cafeteria window < 3300 < 3300 < 3300 < 3300 < 3300 < 3300 < 3300 < 3300 < 3300 No Detected PCB-9 Yellow wood to brick caulking first floor computer room M-8 < 720 < 720 < 720 < 720 < 720 < 720 < 720 < 720 < 720 No Detected PCB-10 White wood to wood caulking first floor M-8 bathroom < 630 < 630 < 630 < 630 < 630 1,800 < 630 < 630 < 630 1,800 PCB-11 White exterior door caulking outer door M-8 < 770 < 770 < 770 < 770 < 770 < 770 < 770 < 770 < 770 No Detected PCB-12 Floor to wall caulking first floor M-7 < 320 < 320 < 320 < 320 < 320 640 < 320 < 320 < 320 640 PCB-13 M-10A, M-12, M-13 courtyard soil on transformer concrete pad < 830 < 830 < 830 < 830 < 830 < 830 < 830 < 830 < 830 No Detected PCB-14 M-10A, M-12, M-13 courtyard soil surrounding transformer concrete pad < 570 < 570 < 570 < 570 < 570 < 570 < 570 < 570 < 570 No Detected PCB-15 M-10A, M-12, M-13 courtyard yellow window to brick caulking < 350 < 350 < 350 < 350 < 350 < 350 < 350 < 350 < 350 No Detected PCB-16 M-10A, M-12, M-13 courtyard black matte window caulking < 380 < 380 < 380 < 380 500 < 380 < 380 < 380 < 380 500 PCB-17 Soil south of transofmer cage next to the power house (M-14)< 390 < 390 < 390 < 390 < 390 < 390 < 390 < 390 < 390 No Detected PCB-18 White paint M-11 < 800 < 800 < 800 < 800 < 800 < 800 < 800 < 800 < 800 No Detected PCB-19 Blue paint over green paint M-11 < 790 < 790 < 790 < 790 < 790 < 790 < 790 < 790 < 790 No Detected PCB-20 Beige and white paint third floor M-4 < 710 < 710 < 710 < 710 < 710 3,500 < 710 < 710 < 710 3,500 Legend: = Laboratory Dection below Residential Direct Exposure Criterion of 1,000 ug/kg = Exceedance of Residential Direct Exposure Criterion of 1,000 ug/kg Notes: Samples were obtained by Nobis Engineering and analyzed by Phoenix Environmental Laboratories of Manchester, CT using EPA Method 8082 and Soxhlet extraction methods. Table 3 Summary of PCB Analytical Results Faria Beede Facility 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT PCB Aroclor and Analytical Result (µg/kg or ppb) Total PCBs Sample Designation Sample Location Description Building 2 Bulb 3' Fixture 2 Bulb 4' Fixture 4 Bulb 4' Fixture 2 Bulb U-Shaped 2 Bulb Circular Fixtures Emergency Lights Exit Signs Total Fixtures Total Bulbs First Floor 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 16 Second Floor 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 18 First Floor 2 47 20 6 0 1 7 75 190 Second Floor 0 43 0 0 0 3 2 43 86 Third Floor 0 3 0 0 22 2 0 25 50 Fourth Floor 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 16 32 Fifth Floor 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 South Stairwell 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 First Floor 0 0 41 9 0 2 2 50 182 Second Floor 0 0 17 4 0 2 2 21 76 Building M-6 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 13 26 First Floor 0 21 0 0 0 2 1 21 42 Second Floor 0 27 0 0 0 2 2 27 54 First Floor 0 18 12 0 0 3 2 30 84 Second Floor 0 26 0 0 0 1 1 26 52 Building M-10 and M-10A 0 101 0 0 0 3 3 101 202 Building M-11 0 81 0 0 0 0 2 81 162 Building M-12 0 33 0 0 0 1 1 33 66 Basement 0 90 0 0 0 1 2 90 180 First Floor 0 128 0 0 0 2 3 128 256 All Floors Total 2 669 90 19 22 27 30 802 1784 Notes: 1. Fluorescent light fixture and bulb counts are estimated based on survey conducted by Nobis Engineering. The presence of mercury containing bulbs and PCB ballasts is assumed. Building M-13 Table 4 Estimated Fluorescent Light Fixtures & Bulb Count Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Building M-4A Building M-4 Building M-5 Building M-8 Building M-7 O:\Active\91730.00 - LEP Services at Faria Corp Montville CT\91730.02 - HBMA Survey\Tables\Table 4 Bulb Count Table Material Description Location Estimated Amount Unit (SF/LF) Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Subtotal Cost Comment Beige 1'x1' Floor Tile Mint Green 1'x1' Floor Tile Green 1'x1' Floor Tile Underneath carpet in offices off the Cafeteria 1,200 SF $8 9,600$ Additional assessment of flooring under carpeting is warranted. Mint Green 1'x1' Floor Tile Loading dock landing of M-7 100 SF $8 800$ Beige 1'x1' Floor Tile Underneath carpet in offices in the first and second floors of buildings M-7 and M- 8; Second floor women's room in M-7; Underneath carpet in second floor offices in M-7; First floor rear lab area M-8; Second floor men's room M-8; Second floor building connector from M-7 to M-8 6,000 SF $8 48,000$ Additional assessment of flooring under carpeting is warranted. Roof Flashings/Cement Roof between M-4 and M-11 (at a minimum)1,500 SF $6 9,000$ This is an allowance. Additional roofing assessment is necessary Glazing and caulking on original windows and doors Facility-wide 75 EA $50 3,750$ Transite board and grey sheetrock M-4 Elevator Shaft 2,000 SF $8 16,000$ Pipe Insulation East wall of cafeteria (Bldg M-12)75 LF $27 2,025$ 89,175$ Notes: 1. Quantities of ACM are estimated and subject to changes based on development plans and requirements. Contractors should verify quantities prior to bidding. 2. The unit costs for asbestos abatement are estimated based on prior completed projects and includes removal using standard asbestos abatement protocols and disposal at a permitted facility. 3. This is an estimate of possible abatement costs. Actual costs will vary, potentially significantly. This consultant's opinion of probable abatement costs is made on the basis of professional judgement and experience. Significant data gaps exist between known and actual conditions which can significantly affect cost. Therefore, no warranty has been expressed or should be implied. ESTIMATED ABATEMENT COST Table 5 Estimated Asbestos Abatement Costs Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, Connecticut O:\Active\91730.00 - LEP Services at Faria Corp Montville CT\91730.02 - HBMA Survey\Tables\Table 5 - Asbestos Abatement Cost Estimate Spreasheet FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT NO.QUADRANGLE LOCATION LOCUS PLAN Thomas G. Faria Corporation 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 91730.00 DATE: September 2016 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 INCH = 2,000 FEET Uncasville, CT September 2016 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Nobis Engineering, Inc. 378 Chase Avenue, Suite 301 Waterbury, CT 06704 T(203) 409-1292 www.nobiseng.com Client-Focused, Employee-Owned HELTCO6567PRI-M215OHW POLE12793POLE2746LP TANKSLPPRI-M216SIGNA/CGUTGGUTUTUTUTMH' SOHW TRANSPADUTUTOHW UT RW - 1 0 1 RECOVERYSYSTEMHELTCO6566POLEPOLEA/CTRANSPRI-M217SUPPORTPOLES UTA/CLPLPUTSITE PLANFARIA BEEDE42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:JDVTFC91730.02OCTOBER 2016FIGURE 2050'100'VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET050'100'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETNOTES:1. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASE MAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES.BUILDINGM-4ABUILDINGM-4BUILDINGM-7BUILDINGM-8BUILDINGM-5BUILDINGM-6BUILDINGM-11BUILDINGM-10ABUILDINGM-10BUILDINGM-12BUILDINGM-13BLDNGM-14PAVILIONClient - Focused, Employee - OwnedNobis Engineering, Inc.378 Chase Avenue, Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704T(203) 409-1292www.nobiseng.com10,000-GALLONAST VAULT(INSIDE ENCLOSURE)BOILERHOUSECAFETERIAPOWERHOUSELEGENDSHALLOW COMPOSITE SOIL SAMPLECOLLECTED FOR TOTAL LEAD ANALYSISLEAD-1LEAD-3LEAD-2PCB-14PCB-13PCB-17THREE ELECTRICALTRANSFORMERS(OFFLINE)TRANSFORMERPAD(ONLINE)CHIMNEYDESIGNATIONLEAD-1SOIL SAMPLE FOR PCB ANALYSISDESIGNATIONPCB-17TTTPAVILION275 GAl.FUEL OILSTORAGE TANK(IN CONTAINMENT)TTELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER PHOTOGRAPHS Site Photographs HBMA Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 1 of 6 Description: View looking to the east from the roof of Building M-13. Description: Pipes were generally observed to be un-insulated throughout the buildings. Site Photographs HBMA Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 2 of 6 Description: Photograph of a typical manufacturing area. Description: Photograph of three off-line transformers located on a concrete pad in an enclosure along the north wall of Building M-13 (inside the courtyard). Two soil samples designated PCB-13 and PRB-14 were collected on and adjacent to the transformer pad. These samples indicated no PCBs were present in the soil. Site Photographs HBMA Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 3 of 6 Description: Photograph of the transformer enclosure an older window found in many buildings on-Site. Soils adjacent to the building foundation in this area had high lead concentrations (sample Lead-2). Description: Photograph of a shed housing a 275-gallon aboveground fuel oil storage tank located at the west end of Building M-13. The exterior newer aluminum-clad replacement windows are also visible. Site Photographs HBMA Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 4 of 6 Description: Photograph of an older wood window found in the boiler house (Building M-6). Description: Photograph of three active electrical transformers located on an enclosed concrete pad on the west side of the power house (Building M-14). Site Photographs HBMA Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 5 of 6 Description: Photograph of transite board around the freight elevator shaft in Building M-4. Description: Photograph of manufacturing area showing painted white and blue brick walls found in many areas. Samples of the paint designated PCB-18 and PCB-19 were found not to contain PCBs; however, the paint was indicated to be leaded. Site Photographs HBMA Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 6 of 6 Description: Photograph of the one section of asbestos insulated pie found on the western wall of the cafeteria (Building M-12). APPENDIX 1 ASBESTOS LABORATORY REPORTS EMSL LABORATORIES EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Attention:Phone:Timothy Carr (203) 232-1061 Fax:Nobis Engineering, Inc. Received Date:378 Chase Avenue 09/27/2016 3:05 PM Analysis Date:Suite 301 09/28/2016 Collected Date:Waterbury, CT 06704 Project:91730.02 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type C-1A 041626894-0001 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor - White Ceiling Plaster above Wood Boards M-4 C-1B 041626894-0002 None DetectedVermiculite Non-fibrous (Other) 2% 98% Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor - White Ceiling Plaster above Wood Boards M-4 R-1A 041626894-0003 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Glass20%Black/Green Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle M-4 R-1B 041626894-0004 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Glass20%Black Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle M-4 R-2A 041626894-0005 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle Tar M-4 R-2B 041626894-0006 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle Tar M-4 R-3A-Roof Shingle 041626894-0007 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)70%Cellulose30%Red/Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle M-8 R-3A-Tar 041626894-0007A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Tar R-3A-Paper 041626894-0007B None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)70%Cellulose30%Brown/Black Fibrous Homogeneous Paper R-3B-Roof Shingle 041626894-0008 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Black Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle M-8 R-3B-Tar 041626894-0008A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Tar R-3B-Paper 041626894-0008B None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)60%Cellulose40%Black Fibrous Homogeneous Paper C-2A 041626894-0009 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)15%Cellulose Min. Wool 50% 35% Gray/White Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House Office - Wormy Ceiling Tile 2'x4' C-2B 041626894-0010 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)25%Cellulose Min. Wool 45% 30% Gray/White Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House Office - Wormy Ceiling Tile 2'x4' C-4A 041626894-0011 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose Min. Wool 40% 40% Gray/White Fibrous Homogeneous First Aid Room - 2x4 Wormy Ceiling Tile C-4B 041626894-0012 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)25%Cellulose Min. Wool 45% 30% Gray/White Fibrous Homogeneous First Aid Room - 2x4 Wormy Ceiling Tile Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 1 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type R-4A 041626894-0013 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Roof - Black Electrical Conduit Riser Flashing Cement M-10 R-5A 041626894-0014 8%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Flashing Cement Black between M-4 and M-11 R-6A 041626894-0015 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)75%Glass25%Black/Green Fibrous Homogeneous Roof - Green Roof Shingle AST R-6B 041626894-0016 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Glass20%Black/Green Fibrous Homogeneous Roof - Green Roof Shingle AS R-7A 041626894-0017 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle Tar w/6A R-7B 041626894-0018 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle Tar w/6B R-8A 041626894-0019 Insufficient MaterialRoof Shingle Paper w/6A R-8B 041626894-0020 Insufficient MaterialRoof Shingle Paper w/6B R-9A 041626894-0021 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Glass20%Brown/Black Fibrous Homogeneous Brown Roof Patch middle Stick up AST Roof Shingle R-9B 041626894-0022 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Glass20%Brown/Black Fibrous Homogeneous Brown Roof Patch middle Stick up AST Roof Shingle R-10A 041626894-0023 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle Tar w/9A R-10B 041626894-0024 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle Tar w/9B R-11A 041626894-0025 5% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose Glass 10% 5% Black Fibrous Homogeneous Roof Shingle Paper w/9A R-11B 041626894-0026 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Roof Shingle Paper w/9B R-12A 041626894-0027 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)85%Glass15%Red/Black Fibrous Homogeneous South Side M-8 Dog House - Red Roof Shingle Shingle only, tar not present in sample bag. R-12B 041626894-0028 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Glass20%Red/Black Fibrous Homogeneous South Side M-8 Dog House - Red Roof Shingle Shingle only, tar not present in sample bag. R-13A 041626894-0029 Insufficient MaterialTar w/12A R-13B 041626894-0030 Insufficient MaterialTar w/12B Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 2 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type R-14A 041626894-0031 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Glass20%White/Black Fibrous Homogeneous South Side M-8 Dog House - White Roof Shingle R-14B 041626894-0032 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Glass20%White/Black Fibrous Homogeneous South Side M-8 Dog House - White Roof Shingle R-15A 041626894-0033 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Tar w/14A R-15B 041626894-0034 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Tar w/14B C-5A 041626894-0035 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Loft Office above Kitchen - 1x1 Ceiling Tile C-5B 041626894-0036 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)15%Cellulose85%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Loft Office above Kitchen - 1x1 Ceiling Tile S-1A 041626894-0037 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor - Black Window to Wall Caulking M-4 S-1B 041626894-0038 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor - Black Window to Wall Caulking M-4 S-1C 041626894-0039 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor - Black Window to Wall Caulking M-4 S-2A 041626894-0040 Not Submitted5th Floor - Brown Window Sealant M-4 S-3A 041626894-0041 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor - Black Window Glazing M-4 S-3B 041626894-0042 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor - Black Window Glazing M-4 S-4A 041626894-0043 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 4th Floor - Brown Window Caulking M-4 S-4B 041626894-0044 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 4th Floor - Brown Window Caulking M-4 S-1D 041626894-0045 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor - Black Window to Wall Caulking S-3C 041626894-0046 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor - Black Window Glazing S-5A 041626894-0047 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House - White Exterior Window Glazing The sample group is not homogeneous S-5B 041626894-0048 4% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)96%Beige Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House - White Exterior Window Glazing The sample group is not homogeneous Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 3 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type S-6A 041626894-0049 8%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House - White Exterior Window Caulking S-6B 041626894-0050 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Boiler House - White Exterior Window Caulking S-7A-Cove Base 041626894-0051 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Blue Cove Base S-7A-Mastic 041626894-0051A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Mastic S-7B-Cove Base 041626894-0052 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Blue Cove Base S-7B-Mastic 041626894-0052A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Mastic S-8A 041626894-0053 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor - Mortar between Rock Walls Exterior M-4 S-9A 041626894-0054 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mens Room off Cafeteria - Slop Sink to Floor Caulking S-9B 041626894-0055 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White/Clear Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mens Room off Cafeteria - Slop Sink to Floor Caulking S-10A 041626894-0056 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mens Room off Cafeteria - Slop Sink to Wall Caulking S-10B 041626894-0057 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mens Room off Cafeteria - Slop Sink to Wall Caulking S-11A 041626894-0058 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Carpet Glue M-8 S-11B 041626894-0059 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Carpet Glue M-8 S-12A 041626894-0060 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Bathroom - White Wood to Wood Caulking M-8 S-12B 041626894-0061 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Computer Room - White Wood to Wood Caulking M-8 S-13A 041626894-0062 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Computer Room - Yellow Wood to Brick Caulking S-13B 041626894-0063 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Computer Room - Yellow Wood to Brick Caulking S-14A 041626894-0064 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Front Entrance - White Exterior Window Caulking S-14B 041626894-0065 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Front Entrance - White Exterior Window Caulking Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 4 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type S-15A-Caulk 041626894-0066 12%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)88%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Inner Door - Caulking on Brick M-8 S-15A-Concrete 041626894-0066A Insufficient MaterialInner Door - Concrete S-15B-Caulk 041626894-0067 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Inner Door - Caulking on Brick M-8 S-15B-Concrete 041626894-0067A Insufficient MaterialInner Door - Concrete S-16A 041626894-0068 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Outer Door Frame - White Caulk S-16B 041626894-0069 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Rear Exterior Door - White Caulk S-16C 041626894-0070 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Rear Exterior Door - White Caulk S-17A 041626894-0071 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)96%Fibrous (Other)4%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Rear Door - Brick Caulking S-17B 041626894-0072 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Rear Door - Brick Caulking S-18A 041626894-0073 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)96%Fibrous (Other)4%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor Womens Room - Caulk around Toilet Base S-18B 041626894-0074 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)95%Fibrous (Other)5%White/Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor Womens Room - Caulk around Toilet Base S-12C 041626894-0075 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor Conference Room - White Wood to Wood Caullking M-7 S-19A 041626894-0076 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Loading Dock 2nd Floor Landing - Brick Grout M-7 S-19B 041626894-0077 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Loading Dock 2nd Floor Landing - Brick Grout M-7 S-20A 041626894-0078 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White/Pink Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor - Floor to Wall Caulking S-20B 041626894-0079 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor - Floor to Wall Caulking S-21A 041626894-0080 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor - White Window to Brick Caulking M-7 S-21B 041626894-0081 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)95%Fibrous (Other)5%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor - Foyer - White Window to Brick Caulking M-7 S-22A 041626894-0082 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Office Area - Window to Wall Caulking Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 5 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type S-22B 041626894-0083 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Office Area - Window to Wall Caulking S-23A 041626894-0084 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Office Area - Green Cove Base M-7 S-23B 041626894-0085 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Office Area - Green Cove Base M-7 S-24A 041626894-0086 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan/White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous Yellow Mastic w/23A Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis S-24B 041626894-0087 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan/Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Yellow Mastic w/23B S-3D 041626894-0088 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor - Black Glazing Window M-7 S-1E 041626894-0089 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor - Black Window to Wall Caulking S-25A 041626894-0090 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/Black/Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Exterior Window - Black Window to Sill Caulking M-7 S-25B 041626894-0091 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Exterior Window - Black Window to Sill Caulking M-7 S-26A 041626894-0092 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)95%Fibrous (Other)5%Tan/White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous White Window to Brick Exterior Caulking M-7 S-26B 041626894-0093 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)95%Fibrous (Other)5%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous White Window to Brick Exterior Caulking M-7 Recommend TEM S-27A 041626894-0094 8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black Fibrous Homogeneous Grey Sealant w/R-9 S-27B 041626894-0095 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Grey Sealant w/R-9 S-28A 041626894-0096 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Courtyard - M-13 - M-10 Window to Brick Caulking Matte Black S-28B 041626894-0097 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Courtyard - M-13 - M-10 Window to Brick Caulking Matte Black S-29A 041626894-0098 4% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)96%Tan/Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Courtyard - Yellow Window to Brick Caulking M-10 - M-13 S-29B 041626894-0099 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Courtyard - Yellow Window to Brick Caulking M-10 - M-13 S-30A 041626894-0100 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)98%Fibrous (Other)2%Gray/White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Exterior Windows - Old Window White Glazing M-10 - M-13 Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 6 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type S-30B 041626894-0101 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)96%Fibrous (Other)4%Gray/White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Exterior Windows - Old Window White Glazing M-10 - M-13 W-2A 041626894-0102 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)10%Cellulose90%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Building - Light Brown Fiberboard M-4A W-2B 041626894-0103 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Brown Fibrous Homogeneous Building - Light Brown Fiberboard M-4A W-3A 041626894-0104 20%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)80%Green Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor Elevator Shaft - Grey Sheetrock M-4 W-3B 041626894-0105 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)5th Floor Elevator Shaft - Grey Sheetrock M-4 W-1B-Wall Plaster 041626894-0106 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor - White Wall Plaster W-1B-Skim Coat 041626894-0106A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 5th Floor - Skim Coat W-1A-Wall Plaster 041626894-0107 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 4th Floor - White Wall Plaster W-1A-Skim Coat 041626894-0107A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 4th Floor - Skim Coat W-4A 041626894-0108 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)95%Hair5%White Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor - White Horse Hair Wall Plaster M-4 W-5A 041626894-0109 None DetectedVermiculite Non-fibrous (Other) 2% 98% Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 4th Floor - Grey Wall Knob Grout M-4 W-1C-Wall Plaster 041626894-0110 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)97%Hair3%Gray Fibrous Homogeneous 4th Floor - White Horse Hair Wall Plaster M-4 W-1C-Skim Coat 041626894-0110A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 4th Floor - Skim Coat W-6A-Sheetrock 041626894-0111 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/Gray Fibrous Homogeneous 4th Floor - White Sheetrock M-4 W-6A-Joint Compound 041626894-0111A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 4th Floor - Joint Compound W-1D-Wall Plaster 041626894-0112 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)97%Hair3%White Fibrous Homogeneous 3rd Floor - White Horse Hair Wall Plaster W-1D-Skim Coat 041626894-0112A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 3rd Floor - Skim Coat W-7A 041626894-0113 25% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)75%Brown Fibrous Homogeneous Elevator Shaft - Transite Board M-4 W-8A 041626894-0114 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House - Concrete Wall Covering over Brick Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 7 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type W-8B 041626894-0115 None DetectedVermiculite Non-fibrous (Other) 3% 97% Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House - Concrete Wall Covering over Brick W-9A 041626894-0116 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)95%Cellulose5%Brown/Gray Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House - Grey Wallboard W-9B-Wallboard 041626894-0117 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/Gray Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House - Grey Wallboard W-9B-Joint Compound 041626894-0117A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Boiler House - Grey Wallboard W-10A 041626894-0118 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - White Wallboard W-10B 041626894-0119 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - White Wallboard W-10C 041626894-0120 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - White Wallboard W-11A-Plaster 041626894-0121 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Grey Plaster under Window W-11A-Skim Coat 041626894-0121A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Various Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Skim Coat Sample appears to be paint. W-11B-Plaster 041626894-0122 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Grey Plaster under Window W-11B-Skim Coat 041626894-0122A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Various Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Skim Coat W-10D 041626894-0123 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous First Aid Room - White Wallboard W-12A-Wallboard 041626894-0124 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose Glass 15% 5% Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Office Area - Wallboard M-8 W-12A-Skim Coat 041626894-0124A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Office Area - Skim Coat Sample appears to be paint. W-12B-Wallboard 041626894-0125 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)78%Cellulose Glass 20% 2% Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Office Area - Wallboard M-8 W-12B-Skim Coat 041626894-0125A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Office Area - Skim Coat Sample appears to be paint. W-12C-Wallboard 041626894-0126 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Office Area - Wallboard M-8 W-12C-Skim Coat 041626894-0126A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Office Area - Skim Coat Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 8 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type Sample appears to be paint. W-12D-Wallboard 041626894-0127 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Utility Closet - Wallboard M-8 W-12D-Skim Coat 041626894-0127A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Utility Closet - Skim Coat Sample appears to be paint. W-12E-Wallboard 041626894-0128 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Floor Hallway - Wallboard M-7 W-12E-Skim Coat 041626894-0128A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Floor Hallway - Skim Coat Sample appears to be paint. W-13A 041626894-0129 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor East Hallway Area - Wall Pattern M-7 W-13B 041626894-0130 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor East Hallway Area - Wall Pattern M-7 W-12F-Wallboard 041626894-0131 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Office - Wallboard W-12F-Skim Coat 041626894-0131A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Office - Skim Coat Sample appears to be joint compound. W-12G-Wallboard 041626894-0132 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose20%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Under Cardboard Panels - Wallboard W-12G-Skim Coat 041626894-0132A Insufficient MaterialUnder Cardboard Panels - Skim Coat FT-1A-Floor Tile 041626894-0133 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Dark Blue FT-1A-Mastic 041626894-0133A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Mastic FT-1B-Floor Tile 041626894-0134 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Dark Blue FT-1B-Mastic 041626894-0134A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Mastic FT-2A-Floor Tile 041626894-0135 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Light Blue FT-2A-Mastic 041626894-0135A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Mastic FT-2B-Floor Tile 041626894-0136 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' Light Blue Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 9 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type FT-2B-Mastic 041626894-0136A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Mastic FT-3A-Floor Tile 041626894-0137 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Royal Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' FT-3A-Mastic 041626894-0137A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Mastic FT-3B-Floor Tile 041626894-0138 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Royal Blue Floor Tile 1'x1' FT-3B-Mastic 041626894-0138A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Mastic FT-4A-Floor Tile 041626894-0139 3% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)97%Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous In Offices off of Cafeteria - Green Floor Tile under Carpet FT-4A-Mastic 041626894-0139A <1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous In Offices off of Cafeteria - Mastic possible contamination from positive FT FT-4B-Floor Tile 041626894-0140 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)In Offices off of Cafeteria - Green Floor Tile under Carpet FT-4B-Mastic 041626894-0140A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous In Offices off of Cafeteria - Mastic FT-5A 041626894-0141 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous In Office off Cafeteria - Yellow Carpet Mastic Limited sample material present FT-5B 041626894-0142 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous In Office off Cafeteria - Yellow Carpet Mastic FT-6A 041626894-0143 4% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)96%Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Under Carpet 1E Room - Mint Green Floor Tile under Carpet FT-6B 041626894-0144 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Under Carpet 1E Room - Mint Green Floor Tile under Carpet FT-7A-Floor Tile 041626894-0145 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Processing Office - Sea Green Tile under Carpet FT-7A-Mastic 041626894-0145A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Processing Office - Mastic FT-7B-Floor Tile 041626894-0146 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Processing Office - Sea Green Tile under Carpet FT-7B-Mastic 041626894-0146A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Processing Office - Mastic Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 10 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type FT-8A-Floor Tile 041626894-0147 3% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)97%Beige Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Under Carpet 1E Room - Beige 1x1 Floor Tile FT-8A-Mastic 041626894-0147A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Under Carpet 1E Room - Mastic FT-8B-Floor Tile 041626894-0148 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Under Carpet 1E Room - Beige 1x1 Floor Tile FT-8B-Mastic 041626894-0148A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Under Carpet 1E Room - Mastic FT-8B-Leveler 041626894-0148B None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Under Carpet 1E Room - Mastic FT-9A-Floor Tile 041626894-0149 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mens Room off Cafeteria - Sky Blue Floor Tile 1x1 FT-9A-Mastic 041626894-0149A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mens Room off Cafeteria - Yellow Mastic FT-9B-Floor Tile 041626894-0150 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mens Room off Cafeteria - Sky Blue Floor Tile 1x1 FT-9B-Mastic 041626894-0150A None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mens Room off Cafeteria - Yellow Mastic FT-10A 041626894-0151 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Bathroom - Blue 1x1 Floor Tile in M-8 FT-11A 041626894-0152 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan/Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Yellow Mastic w/10A FT-12A 041626894-0153 Insufficient MaterialBrown Mastic w/10A FT-10B 041626894-0154 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor Bathroom - Blue 1x1 Floor Tile in M-8 FT-11B 041626894-0155 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Yellow Mastic w/10B FT-12B 041626894-0156 Insufficient MaterialBrown Mastic w/10B FT-13A 041626894-0157 2% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)98%Beige Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Rear Right Office - Beige 1x1 Floor Tile under Carpet FT-13B 041626894-0158 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Rear Lab Area - Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-8 FT-14A 041626894-0159 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Brown Mastic w/13A FT-14B 041626894-0160 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Brown Mastic w/13B Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 11 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type FT-13C 041626894-0161 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)2nd Floor Mend Room - Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-8 FT-14C 041626894-0162 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Brown Mastic w/13C FT-13D 041626894-0163 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)2nd Floor Building Connector - Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-8 - M-7 FT-14D 041626894-0164 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Brown Mastic w/13D FT-15A 041626894-0165 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Brown Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor Utility Room - Flooring M-7 FT-16A 041626894-0166 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Black Mastic w/15A FT-15B 041626894-0167 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor Utility Room - Flooring M-7 FT-16B 041626894-0168 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Black Mastic w/15B FT-17A 041626894-0169 5% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)95%Beige Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor Womens Room - Beige 1x1 Tile M-7 FT-17B 041626894-0170 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)2nd Floor Womens Room - Beige 1x1 Tile M-7 FT-18A 041626894-0171 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Brown Mastic w/17A FT-18B 041626894-0172 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Brown Mastic w/17B FT-19A 041626894-0173 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Raised Computer Room 2nd Floor - Brown 1x1 Floor Tile M-7 FT-19B 041626894-0174 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Raised Computer Room 2nd Floor - Brown 1x1 Floor Tile M-7 FT-20A 041626894-0175 Insufficient MaterialBlack Mastic w/19A FT-20B 041626894-0176 Insufficient MaterialBlack Mastic w/19B FT-21A 041626894-0177 2% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)98%Beige Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 2nd Floor 1st Right Side Office - Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-7 FT-21B 041626894-0178 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)2nd Floor 1st Right Side Office - Beige 1x1 Floor Tile M-7 Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 12 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type FT-22A 041626894-0179 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Black Mastic w/21A FT-22B 041626894-0180 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Black Mastic w/21B FT-23A 041626894-0181 4%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)96%Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Mint Green 1x1 Tile M-2 FT-23B 041626894-0182 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Mint Green 1x1 Tile M-2 FT-24A 041626894-0183 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Black Mastic w/23A FT-24B 041626894-0184 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Black Mastic w/23B FT-25A 041626894-0185 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor M-7 - Off White 1x1 Floor Tile FT-25B 041626894-0186 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor M-7 - Off White Floor Tile FT-26A 041626894-0187 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor M-7 - Brown Mastic w/25A FT-26B 041626894-0188 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1st Floor M-7 - Brown Mastic w/25B TSI-1A 041626894-0189 5% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)25%Cellulose70%Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous Cafeteria - Pipe Insulation TSI-1B 041626894-0190 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Cafeteria - Pipe Insulation Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 13 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 041626894EMSL Order: Customer ID:NOBI50A Customer PO:91730.02 Project ID: Analyst(s) Andrew Coward (3) Chelsey Bilhear (46) Christian Strey (16) Edward Zambrano (9) Jonathan Blanfort (20) Juli Patel (8) Matthew Hermann (55) Quynh Vu (20) Samantha Rundstorm-Cruz (17) Seri Smith (6) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government . Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# 68-00367 Initial report from: 09/28/2016 23:35:46 Page 14 of 14ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 9/28/2016 11:35 PM APPENDIX 2 LEAD PAINT XRF SCREENING RESULTS Index Time Side Room Component Substrate Feature Results mg/cm2 PbC Error PbL PbL Error PbK PbK Error 671 10:31 AM B Exterior Built-in Metal Hand Rail Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.62 3.69 672 10:31 AM A Exterior Door Wood Casing Negative 0.05 0.09 0.05 0.09 0.15 1.83 673 10:33 AM C Exterior Window Concrete Stool Positive 37.50 34 10.1 8.6 37.5 34 674 10:33 AM C Exterior Wall Brick Wall Positive 3.60 2.4 3.6 2.4 17.9 16.5 675 10:34 AM D Exterior Door Wood Casing Positive 3.60 2.3 3.6 2.3 4.6 7.1 676 10:34 AM D Exterior Door Wood Door Positive 1.80 0.8 1.8 0.8 1.5 2.9 677 10:36 AM A Exterior Door Metal Door Negative 0.14 0.2 0.14 0.2 0.4 3 678 10:37 AM D Entry Room Wall Panelling Wall Positive 9.50 8.4 9.5 8.4 14.7 14.4 679 10:37 AM D Entry Room Door Wood Casing Positive 3.80 2.4 3.8 2.4 10.4 10.1 680 10:38 AM D Entry Room Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.4 0.9 681 10:39 AM D Entry Room Wall Metal Pipe Negative 0.80 0.1 0.8 0.1 1.3 0.7 682 10:40 AM D Entry Room Floor Wood Column Negative 0.05 0.17 0.05 0.17 0.5 2.2 683 10:40 AM D Entry Room Ceiling Wood Ceiling Positive 16.40 15.3 7.2 6.3 16.4 15.3 684 10:41 AM D Entry Room Floor Wood Column Positive 33.70 30.9 2.1 2 33.7 30.9 685 10:41 AM D Entry Room Floor Wood Column Positive 30.80 27.9 5.4 4.6 30.8 27.9 686 10:41 AM D Entry Room Floor Wood Column Negative 0.05 0.17 0.05 0.17 1 2.2 687 10:43 AM A Entry Room Wall Concrete Wall Positive 2.60 1.5 2.6 1.5 2.5 6.1 688 10:43 AM A Entry Room Window Wood Stool Negative 0.09 0.13 0.09 0.13 0.9 2.7 689 10:44 AM A Entry Room Ceiling Wood Ceiling Negative 0.19 0.41 0.19 0.41 0.9 3.2 690 10:44 AM A Entry Room Window Wood Casing Positive 27.60 25.9 10.1 16.2 27.6 25.9 691 10:46 AM C Bath Wall Panelling Wall Negative 0.05 0.12 0.05 0.12 0.12 2.09 692 10:47 AM B Bath Window Wood Casing Negative 0.04 0.1 0.04 0.1 0.19 1.72 693 10:47 AM B Bath Window Wood Stool Negative 0.80 0.1 0.8 0.1 1.1 0.6 694 10:48 AM B Bath Wall Concrete Wall Negative 0.90 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.8 0.6 695 10:51 AM B Stairwell Wall Concrete Wall Positive 2.10 1.1 1.1 0.2 2.1 1.1 696 10:51 AM B Stairwell Wall Wood Column Positive 25.60 20.5 7.9 6 25.6 20.5 697 10:51 AM B Stairwell Ceiling Wood Ceiling Positive 39.00 34.2 8.1 14.9 39 34.2 698 10:52 AM B Stairwell Stair Wood Baseboard Negative 0.00 0.03 0 0.03 0.18 4.12 699 10:52 AM B Stairwell Stair Metal Hand Rail Negative 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.05 -0.02 3.95 700 10:53 AM B Stairwell Stair Wood Upper Trim Positive 35.40 32.1 2.3 4.6 35.4 32.1 701 10:53 AM B Stairwell Stair Wood Upper Trim Positive 36.60 32.8 3.8 6.6 36.6 32.8 702 10:53 AM C Stairwell Window Wood Casing Positive 32.00 28.8 7.1 5.2 32 28.8 703 10:53 AM C Stairwell Window Wood Stool Positive 2.60 1.6 2.6 1.6 5.6 6.6 704 10:54 AM C Stairwell Wall Concrete Wall Negative 0.80 0.1 0.8 0.1 1.6 0.7 705 10:55 AM C Stairwell Floor Wood Floor Negative 0.07 0.12 0.07 0.12 0.4 2.3 706 10:55 AM C Room Floor Wood Column Positive 3.60 2.6 3.6 2.6 9.6 11 707 10:59 AM A Room Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.60 0.1 0.6 0.1 1.2 0.6 708 11:02 AM A Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 2.70 1.2 1.3 0.4 2.7 1.2 709 11:04 AM D Exterior Door Wood Casing Negative 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.07 0.24 2.24 710 11:04 AM D Exterior Built-in Panelling Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.4 2.9 711 11:07 AM D Cellar Built-in Concrete Wall Negative 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 -0.03 1.7 712 11:08 AM D Cellar Floor Metal Pipe Negative 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.3 4.01 713 11:10 AM D Cellar Wall stone Wall Positive 3.30 2.2 3.3 2.2 4 6.8 714 11:11 AM B Cellar Wall Wood Wall Positive 4.50 3.5 4.5 3.5 6.4 7.7 715 11:13 AM B Cellar Ramp Floor Concrete Floor Negative 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.18 2.65 716 11:14 AM A Elevator Area Wall Concrete Wall Positive 1.60 0.6 0.08 0.04 1.6 0.6 717 11:15 AM B Elevator Area Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.06 0.5 0.9 718 11:15 AM B Elevator Area Wall Brick Wall Positive 2.50 1.3 2.5 1.3 3.1 3.4 729 11:36 AM A Exterior Door Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.09 2.4 730 11:36 AM A Exterior Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 1.63 731 11:41 AM A Basement Wall Brick Wall Null 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.9 0.6 732 11:42 AM A Basement Wall Brick Wall Null 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.9 0.8 Storage - Building M-4 Storage - Building M-4A Boiler/Maintenance - Building M-6 Building M-5 LEAD BASED PAINT IDENTIFICATION USING XRF METHOD FARIA BEEDE FACILITY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT 1 of 4 Index Time Side Room Component Substrate Feature Results mg/cm2 PbC Error PbL PbL Error PbK PbK Error LEAD BASED PAINT IDENTIFICATION USING XRF METHOD FARIA BEEDE FACILITY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT 733 11:42 AM A Basement Wall Brick Wall Null 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.9 0.8 734 11:43 AM B Basement Wall Brick Wall Null 0.17 0.13 0.17 0.13 0.8 2 735 11:43 AM B Basement Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.60 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.5 1 736 11:44 AM C Basement Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.3 0.97 737 11:45 AM C Basement Door Wood Door Negative 0.80 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.9 0.6 738 11:45 AM C Basement Door Wood Door Positive 2.20 1.2 2.2 1.2 3.2 4.9 636 9:59 AM A Break Room Door Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.03 0 0.03 0.5 2 637 10:00 AM A Break Room Wall Wood Wall Negative 0.40 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.3 2.48 638 10:00 AM A Break Room Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.06 -0.33 1.98 639 10:01 AM A Break Room Floor Concrete Floor Negative 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.01 1.12 640 10:01 AM D Break Room Window Wood Casing Positive 14.80 13.8 1.1 3.7 14.8 13.8 641 10:02 AM D Break Room Window Wood Stool Positive 17.10 15.5 3.1 4.6 17.1 15.5 642 10:02 AM C Break Room Door Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.28 2.27 643 10:02 AM C Break Room Door Wood Jamb Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.27 2.06 644 10:03 AM B Side B Room Window Wood Casing Positive 2.30 1.3 0.12 0.32 2.3 1.3 645 10:04 AM B Side B Room Window Wood Stool Negative 0.40 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 1.6 646 10:04 AM C Side B Room Door Wood Casing Null 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.01 2.7 647 10:04 AM C Side B Room Door Wood Casing Negative 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.1 2.08 648 10:07 AM B Back Office Window Wood Casing Negative 0.11 0.32 0.11 0.32 0.5 2.1 649 10:07 AM B Back Office Window Wood Stool Positive 2.70 1.6 2.7 1.6 3.8 4.7 650 10:07 AM B Back Office Window Wood Stool Positive 2.90 1.9 2.9 1.9 4.1 5 651 10:08 AM B Back Office Built-in Metal Pipe Negative 0.60 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.9 2.9 652 10:09 AM D Back Office Window Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.01 1.36 653 10:09 AM D Back Office Window Wood Stool Negative 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.07 0.23 1.8 654 10:10 AM D Back Office Wall Wallboard Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.29 1.36 655 10:11 AM A Exterior Door Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.4 1.9 656 10:12 AM A Exterior Door Wood Upper Trim Negative 0.00 0.03 0 0.03 -0.22 2.01 657 10:13 AM A Exterior Stair Metal Tread Negative 0.04 0.1 0.04 0.1 1.1 4.2 658 10:13 AM A Exterior Stair Metal Hand Rail Negative 0.60 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.7 2.9 659 10:14 AM A Exterior Stair Metal Baseboard Negative 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.01 4.08 660 10:15 AM B Exterior Door Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.03 0 0.03 0.5 1.9 661 10:15 AM B Exterior Door Metal Door Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.14 3.61 662 10:17 AM D Exterior Upper CrossingWood Wall Positive 8.30 6.4 8.3 6.4 11 15.4 663 10:18 AM D Exterior Wall Brick Wall Positive 7.60 6.3 1.6 0.8 7.6 6.3 664 10:19 AM D Exterior Window Brick Upper Trim Positive 30.00 28.2 10.1 17.1 30 28.2 665 10:20 AM D Exterior Built-in Wood Column Negative 0.30 0.35 0.3 0.35 -0.02 2.32 666 10:21 AM D Exterior Stair Wood Tread Negative 0.40 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.6 2.2 667 10:21 AM D Exterior Stair Wood Baseboard Negative 0.29 0.23 0.29 0.23 0.7 2.1 668 10:22 AM D Exterior Ceiling Wood Ceiling Positive 4.50 3.5 4.5 3.5 7.8 10.9 669 10:23 AM D Exterior Window Brick Upper Trim Positive 1.20 0.2 1.2 0.2 1.6 1.1 670 10:25 AM D Exterior Window Brick Upper Trim Positive 8.90 6.4 8.9 6.4 12.5 12.2 606 9:39 AM A Offices Door Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.13 2.27 607 9:40 AM B Offices Door Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.03 2.14 608 9:40 AM A Offices Door Wood Jamb Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.4 2.1 609 9:41 AM C Offices Wall Wallboard Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.18 1.77 610 9:41 AM C Offices Wall Wood Baseboard Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.32 1.77 611 9:41 AM D Offices Wall Brick Baseboard Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.4 0.9 612 9:42 AM B Offices Door Wood Jamb Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.21 1.9 613 9:43 AM C Offices Wall Panelling Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.5 1.69 614 9:44 AM D Offices Window Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.4 1.9 615 9:44 AM D Offices Window Wood Stool Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0 1.9 616 9:45 AM C Offices Wall Panelling Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.2 2.08 617 9:46 AM A Bath Wall Panelling Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.38 1.93 618 9:46 AM A Bath Wall Panelling Wall Negative 0.03 0.17 0.03 0.17 0.01 2.34 Office - Building M-7 Office Building - Building M-8 2 of 4 Index Time Side Room Component Substrate Feature Results mg/cm2 PbC Error PbL PbL Error PbK PbK Error LEAD BASED PAINT IDENTIFICATION USING XRF METHOD FARIA BEEDE FACILITY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT 619 9:46 AM A Bath Wall Wood Chair Rail Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.4 1.7 620 9:47 AM A Bath Wall Wood Baseboard Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.7 1.7 621 9:49 AM A Back Room Wall Wallboard Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.04 1.62 622 9:49 AM A Back Room Door Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.3 2.06 623 9:49 AM A Back Room Door Wood Jamb Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.33 1.83 624 9:50 AM A Back Room Door Wood Door Negative 0.00 0.03 0 0.03 -0.17 2.34 625 9:50 AM C Back Room Wall Tile Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.74 2.08 626 9:51 AM C Back Room Door Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.19 1.74 627 9:51 AM C Back Room Door Wood Jamb Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.06 2.08 628 9:52 AM D Back Room Window Wood Casing Negative 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.06 -0.12 2.23 629 9:52 AM D Back Room Window Concrete Stool Positive 23.70 21.5 10.1 8.6 23.7 21.5 634 9:57 AM A Stairwell Wall Panelling Wall Negative 0.02 0.18 0.02 0.18 -0.07 2.45 635 9:57 AM A Stairwell Stair Wood Baseboard Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.17 1.89 630 9:53 AM D Exterior Door entry Wood Casing Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.18 1.78 631 9:54 AM D Exterior Wall Panelling Wall Negative 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 -0.55 2.3 632 9:54 AM A Exterior Window Wood Casing Negative 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.06 -0.26 1.71 633 9:55 AM B Exterior Window Concrete Stool Positive 1.40 0.3 1.4 0.3 2.6 1.9 723 11:26 AM D Exterior Window Wood Stool Positive 2.80 1.6 2.8 1.6 3.1 5.4 724 11:27 AM D Exterior Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.3 0.95 725 11:28 AM D Exterior Wall Wood Wall Positive 1.20 0.2 1.2 0.2 1.7 0.7 726 11:31 AM D Room Door Wood Door Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.05 1.39 727 11:31 AM A Room Wall Wood Wall Positive 3.50 2.3 1.9 0.5 3.5 2.3 728 11:34 AM A Exterior Pillar Brick Wall Negative 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 -0.71 2.41 719 11:17 AM C Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 1.00 0.2 1 0.2 1.6 0.6 720 11:17 AM C Room Floor Wood Floor Negative 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.05 2.37 721 11:20 AM A Room Wall Wallboard Wall Negative 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.14 1.55 722 11:23 AM B Room Window Wood Upper Trim Positive 1.20 0.4 0.2 0.1 1.2 0.4 739 11:51 AM A Room Wall Concrete Wall Positive 2.20 1.2 1.4 0.7 2.2 1.2 740 11:52 AM D Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 1.90 0.9 0.8 0.4 1.9 0.9 741 11:53 AM D Room Door Wood Door Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.17 2.02 742 11:53 AM D Room Door Wallboard Door Negative 0.00 0.03 0 0.03 0.4 1.8 743 11:54 AM A Room Door Wood Casing Negative 0.16 0.21 0.16 0.21 0.4 2 744 11:54 AM A Room Door Wood Jamb Negative 0.10 0.17 0.1 0.17 0.04 1.94 745 11:55 AM C Room Wall Metal Pipe Negative 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.9 4 746 11:56 AM C Room Wall Plywood Wall Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 -0.23 1.79 747 11:56 AM C Room Wall Plywood Wall Negative 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 -0.12 1.62 748 11:58 AM C Room Stair Wood Baseboard Negative 0.00 0.03 0 0.03 0.11 1.52 749 12:01 PM D Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 1.40 0.3 1.4 0.3 2.2 1.9 750 12:01 PM D Room Wall Brick Wall Positive 2.60 1.6 2.6 1.6 1.4 4.9 751 12:02 PM D Room Wall Wood Baseboard Negative 0.03 0.09 0.03 0.09 1.1 2.2 752 12:04 PM D Room Floor Metal Pipe Negative 0.60 0.3 0.6 0.3 1 2.7 753 12:04 PM D Room Floor Metal Pipe Positive 18.40 17 9 9 18.4 17 754 12:06 PM B Room Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.80 0.1 0.8 0.1 1.2 0.4 755 12:07 PM B Room Window Wood Sash Positive 6.20 4.9 3 3.6 6.2 4.9 756 12:07 PM B Room Window Wood Casing Positive 6.90 5.9 0.4 0.6 6.9 5.9 757 12:07 PM B Room Window Wood Stool Positive 7.30 5.8 5.7 5 7.3 5.8 758 12:08 PM B Basement Floor Wood Floor Negative 0.02 0.1 0.02 0.1 0.5 2.4 759 12:09 PM B Basement Wall Brick Wall Positive 1.60 0.6 1.6 0.6 3.7 2.9 760 12:10 PM C Basement Wall Brick Wall Null 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.06 1 1.3 761 12:11 PM C Basement Wall Brick Wall Negative -0.05 0.91 0.06 0.05 -0.05 0.91 762 12:11 PM C Basement Wall Brick Wall Positive 15.30 13.2 5.2 4.6 15.3 13.2 763 12:11 PM C Basement Window Wood Stool Positive 7.40 6.1 2.7 2.4 7.4 6.1 Manufacturing - Building M-11 Cafeteria/Offices - Building M-12 Manufacturing - Building M-13 Manufacturing - Building M-10 & M-10A 3 of 4 Index Time Side Room Component Substrate Feature Results mg/cm2 PbC Error PbL PbL Error PbK PbK Error LEAD BASED PAINT IDENTIFICATION USING XRF METHOD FARIA BEEDE FACILITY 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT 764 12:12 PM C Basement Window Wood Stool Positive 7.70 6.6 4.4 3.5 7.7 6.6 765 12:13 PM C Basement Floor Concrete Floor Negative 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.2 1.02 766 12:13 PM C Basement Ceiling Wood Ceiling Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.4 1.8 767 12:14 PM C Basement Chimney Brick Wall Negative 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.4 0.8 768 12:14 PM D Basement Window Wood Sash Positive 4.20 3 4.2 3 5.7 9.3 769 12:15 PM D Basement Window Wood Sash Positive 3.30 2.2 3.3 2.2 8.4 11.6 770 12:15 PM D Basement Window Wood Upper Trim Negative 0.70 0.3 0.7 0.3 1.5 1.4 771 12:16 PM D Basement Window Brick Column Negative 0.00 0.02 0 0.02 0.5 0.9 772 12:18 PM D Basement Wall Brick Wall Negative 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.6 0.9 773 12:19 PM D Basement Wall stone Wall Negative 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1.1 0.6 774 12:19 PM D Basement Ceiling Wood Ceiling Negative 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.4 1.5 775 12:26 PM Positive 1.30 0.4 1.3 0.4 -0.2 1.79 776 12:26 PM Positive 1.00 0.3 1 0.3 0.4 1.5 777 12:27 PM Positive 1.00 0.2 1 0.2 0.5 1.2 Notes: 1. Readings obtained on September 27, 2016 by Joyce Morin ( CT Licensed Lead Inspector #: 002209) of the Boston Lead Company, Middletown, CT. 2. Reading swere obtained using a Thermo Scientific™ Niton™ XLp 300 Series XRF Calibrate 4 of 4 APPENDIX 3 PCB AND LEAD IN SOIL LABORATORY REPORT PHOENIX ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES BV24318 - BV24340 Monday, October 03, 2016 Sample ID#s: Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc 378 Chase Ave Suite 301 Waterbury, CT 06704 Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Sincerely yours, Laboratory Director Phyllis Shiller If you have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext. 200. NELAC - #NY11301 CT Lab Registration #PH-0618MA Lab Registration #MA-CT-007ME Lab Registration #CT-007 NH Lab Registration #213693-A,B NJ Lab Registration #CT-003 NY Lab Registration #11301PA Lab Registration #68-03530RI Lab Registration #63 VT Lab Registration #VT11301 This laboratory is in compliance with the NELAC requirements of procedures used except where indicated. This report contains results for the parameters tested, under the sampling conditions described on the Chain Of Custody, as received by the laboratory. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. A scanned version of the COC form accompanies the analytical report and is an exact duplicate of the original. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O. Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040Telephone (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-1 Phoenix ID:BV24318 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 2300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 2300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 2300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 2300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 3500PCB-1248 2300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1254 2300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 2300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 2300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 2300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 97% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 77% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 1 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-1 Phoenix I.D.:BV24318 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 2 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-2 Phoenix ID:BV24319 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 1200 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 1200 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 1200 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 1200 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1248 1200 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 2100PCB-1254 1200 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 1200 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 1200 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 1200 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 101% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 77% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 3 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-2 Phoenix I.D.:BV24319 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 4 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-3 Phoenix ID:BV24320 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 1100 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 1100 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 1100 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 1100 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 1400PCB-1248 1100 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1254 1100 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 1100 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 1100 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 1100 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 85% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 74% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 5 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-3 Phoenix I.D.:BV24320 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 6 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-4 Phoenix ID:BV24321 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 900 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1221 900 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1232 900 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1242 900 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 1000PCB-1248 900 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1254 900 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1260 900 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1262 900 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1268 900 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 QA/QC Surrogates 75% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 62% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 Page 7 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-4 Phoenix I.D.:BV24321 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 8 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-5 Phoenix ID:BV24322 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 780 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1221 780 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1232 780 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1242 780 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1248 780 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1254 780 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1260 780 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1262 780 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1268 780 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 QA/QC Surrogates 61% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 61% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 Page 9 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-5 Phoenix I.D.:BV24322 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 10 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-6 Phoenix ID:BV24323 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 700 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 700 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 700 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 700 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1248 700 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 2700PCB-1254 700 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 700 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 700 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 700 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 98% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 80% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 11 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-6 Phoenix I.D.:BV24323 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 12 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-7 Phoenix ID:BV24324 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 740 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 740 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 740 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 740 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1248 740 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1254 740 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 740 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 740 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 740 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 104% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 81% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 13 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-7 Phoenix I.D.:BV24324 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 14 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-8 Phoenix ID:BV24325 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 3300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 20 NDPCB-1221 3300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 20 NDPCB-1232 3300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 20 NDPCB-1242 3300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 20 NDPCB-1248 3300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 20 NDPCB-1254 3300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 20 NDPCB-1260 3300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 20 NDPCB-1262 3300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 20 NDPCB-1268 3300 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 20 QA/QC Surrogates 96% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%20 82% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%20 Page 15 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-8 Phoenix I.D.:BV24325 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. PCB Comment:Due to the presence of what appears to be Chlordane in the sample which co-elutes with the PCBs, an elevated RL was reported. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 16 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-9 Phoenix ID:BV24326 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/28/16 Q/I SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 720 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 720 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 720 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 720 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1248 720 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1254 720 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 720 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 720 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 720 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 91% DCBP 09/29/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 85% TCMX 09/29/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 17 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-9 Phoenix I.D.:BV24326 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 18 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-10 Phoenix ID:BV24327 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 630 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1221 630 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1232 630 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1242 630 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1248 630 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 1800PCB-1254 630 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1260 630 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1262 630 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1268 630 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 QA/QC Surrogates 47% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 37% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 Page 19 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-10 Phoenix I.D.:BV24327 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 20 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-11 Phoenix ID:BV24328 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 770 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 770 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 770 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 770 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1248 770 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1254 770 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 770 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 770 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 770 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 89% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 72% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 21 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-11 Phoenix I.D.:BV24328 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 22 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-12 Phoenix ID:BV24329 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 320 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1221 320 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1232 320 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1242 320 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1248 320 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 640PCB-1254 320 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1260 320 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1262 320 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1268 320 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 QA/QC Surrogates 75% DCBP 09/27/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 61% TCMX 09/27/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 Page 23 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-12 Phoenix I.D.:BV24329 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 24 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: SOIL NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-13 Phoenix ID:BV24330 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution 43Percent Solid 09/26/16 W SW846-%Solid% CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 830 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1221 830 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1232 830 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1242 830 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1248 830 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1254 830 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1260 830 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1262 830 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1268 830 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 QA/QC Surrogates 86% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%10 75% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%10 Page 25 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-13 Phoenix I.D.:BV24330 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 26 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: SOIL NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-14 Phoenix ID:BV24331 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution 62Percent Solid 09/26/16 W SW846-%Solid% CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 570 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1221 570 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1232 570 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1242 570 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1248 570 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1254 570 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1260 570 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1262 570 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1268 570 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 QA/QC Surrogates 83% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%10 81% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%10 Page 27 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-14 Phoenix I.D.:BV24331 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 28 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-15 Phoenix ID:BV24332 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 350 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1221 350 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1232 350 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1242 350 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1248 350 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1254 350 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1260 350 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1262 350 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1268 350 09/27/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 QA/QC Surrogates 72% DCBP 09/27/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 55% TCMX 09/27/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 Page 29 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-15 Phoenix I.D.:BV24332 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 30 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-16 Phoenix ID:BV24333 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 380 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1221 380 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1232 380 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1242 380 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 500PCB-1248 380 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1254 380 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1260 380 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1262 380 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 NDPCB-1268 380 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 2 QA/QC Surrogates 73% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 60% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%2 Page 31 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-16 Phoenix I.D.:BV24333 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 32 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: SOIL NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-17 Phoenix ID:BV24334 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution 86Percent Solid 09/26/16 W SW846-%Solid% CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 390 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1221 390 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1232 390 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1242 390 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1248 390 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1254 390 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1260 390 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1262 390 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 NDPCB-1268 390 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 10 QA/QC Surrogates 70% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%10 62% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%10 Page 33 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-17 Phoenix I.D.:BV24334 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 34 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-18 Phoenix ID:BV24335 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 800 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 800 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 800 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 800 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1248 800 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1254 800 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 800 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 800 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 800 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 97% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 83% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 35 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-18 Phoenix I.D.:BV24335 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 36 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-19 Phoenix ID:BV24336 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/28/16 Q/I SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 790 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 790 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 790 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 790 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1248 790 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1254 790 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 790 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 790 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 790 09/29/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 88% DCBP 09/29/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 69% TCMX 09/29/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 37 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-19 Phoenix I.D.:BV24336 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 38 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: BULK NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data PCB-20 Phoenix ID:BV24337 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution CompletedExtraction for PCB 09/26/16 Q/IR SW3540C PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 710 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1221 710 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1232 710 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1242 710 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1248 710 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 3500PCB-1254 710 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1260 710 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1262 710 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 NDPCB-1268 710 09/28/16 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5 QA/QC Surrogates 84% DCBP 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 71% TCMX 09/28/16 AW 30 - 150 %%5 Page 39 of 43 Ver 1 PCB-20 Phoenix I.D.:BV24337 Client ID: 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLEProject ID: Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By ReferenceDilution Comments: Results are reported on an ``as received`` basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Page 40 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: SOIL NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data LEAD-1 Phoenix ID:BV24338 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution 876Lead 3.1 10/02/16 LK SW6010Cmg/Kg 10 CompletedTotal Metals Digest 09/27/16 X/AG SW3050B Comments: Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level Page 41 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: SOIL NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data LEAD-2 Phoenix ID:BV24339 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution 1590Lead 34 10/02/16 LK SW6010Cmg/Kg 100 CompletedTotal Metals Digest 09/27/16 X/AG SW3050B Comments: Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level Page 42 of 43 Ver 1 Sample Information Custody Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: Collected by: Received by: Analyzed by: SOIL NOBIS Standard 91730.02 09/22/16 B see "By" below Laboratory Data LEAD-3 Phoenix ID:BV24340 09/26/16 14:30 Parameter Result RL/PQL Units Date/Time By Reference FOR:Attn: Ms. Alyssa EpsteinNobis Engineering, Inc378 Chase Ave Suite 301Waterbury, CT 06704 Analysis Report October 03, 2016 Date Time 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG ID:GBV24318 Client ID: Project ID:42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE Dilution 796Lead 3.0 10/02/16 LK SW6010Cmg/Kg 10 CompletedTotal Metals Digest 09/27/16 X/AG SW3050B Comments: Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director October 03, 2016 If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody. Reviewed and Released by: Bobbi Aloisa, Vice President RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level ND=Not Detected BRL=Below Reporting Level Page 43 of 43 Ver 1 QA/QC Data Parameter Blk Blank RL MS % MSD % MS RPD QA/QC Report October 03, 2016 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG I.D.:GBV24318 LCS % Dup RPD LCSD % LCS RPD %Rec Limits %RPD Limits Sample Result Dup Result QA/QC Batch 360423 (mg/kg), QC Sample No: BV24545 (BV24338, BV24339, BV24340) ICP Metals - Soil Lead 97.4BRL99.110.1 75 - 125 304.67 4.220.33 Page 1 of 3 QA/QC Data Parameter Blk Blank RL MS % MSD % MS RPD QA/QC Report October 03, 2016 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. SDG I.D.:GBV24318 LCS % LCSD % LCS RPD %Rec Limits %RPD Limits QA/QC Batch 360236 (ug/Kg), QC Sample No: BV24300 10X (BV24318, BV24319, BV24320, BV24321, BV24322) Polychlorinated Biphenyls - Bulk PCB-1016 89 96ND 7.686 102 17.0 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1221 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1232 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1242 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1248 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1254 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1260 78 87ND 10.990 90 0.0 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1262 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1268 ND 40 - 140 30170 % DCBP (Surrogate Rec)85 9290 7.998 98 0.0 30 - 150 30% % TCMX (Surrogate Rec)86 9089 4.597 103 6.0 30 - 150 30% QA/QC Batch 360241 (ug/Kg), QC Sample No: BV24323 10X (BV24323, BV24324, BV24325, BV24327, BV24328, BV24329, BV24330, BV24331, BV24332, BV24333, BV24334, BV24335, BV24337, BV24338, BV24339, BV24340) Polychlorinated Biphenyls - Bulk, Soil PCB-1016 ND 75 80 6.5 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1221 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1232 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1242 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1248 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1254 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1260 ND 70 73 4.2 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1262 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1268 ND 40 - 140 30170 % DCBP (Surrogate Rec)75 80 83 3.7 30 - 150 30% % TCMX (Surrogate Rec)65 73 76 4.0 30 - 150 30% A LCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate. Comment: QA/QC Batch 360439 (ug/Kg), QC Sample No: BV29054 10X (BV24326, BV24336) Polychlorinated Biphenyls - Bulk PCB-1016 ND 78 78 0.0 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1221 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1232 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1242 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1248 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1254 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1260 ND 84 84 0.0 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1262 ND 40 - 140 30170 PCB-1268 ND 40 - 140 30170 % DCBP (Surrogate Rec)100 99 99 0.0 30 - 150 30% % TCMX (Surrogate Rec)81 82 87 5.9 30 - 150 30% Page 2 of 3 QA/QC Data Parameter Blk Blank RL MS % MSD % MS RPD SDG I.D.:GBV24318 LCS % LCSD % LCS RPD %Rec Limits %RPD Limits MS - Matrix Spike Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200. October 03, 2016MS Dup - Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference LCS - Laboratory Control Sample LCSD - Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate NC - No Criteria Intf - Interference Page 3 of 3 Sample Criteria Exceedences ReportMonday, October 03, 2016 Page 1 of 2 Acode Phoenix Analyte CriteriaResultRLSampNo AnalysisUnitsCriteria GBV24318 - NOBISCriteria:CT: I/C, RC RLCriteria State:CT $PCB_SOXR PCB-1221 1000ND2300 ug/KgBV24318CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1232 1000ND2300 ug/KgBV24318CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1242 1000ND2300 ug/KgBV24318CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1248 10003500 2300 ug/KgBV24318CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1254 1000ND2300 ug/KgBV24318CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1260 1000ND2300 ug/KgBV24318CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1262 1000ND2300 ug/KgBV24318CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1268 1000ND2300 ug/KgBV24318CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1016 1000ND2300 ug/KgBV24318CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1221 1000ND1200 ug/KgBV24319CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1268 1000ND1200 ug/KgBV24319CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1262 1000ND1200 ug/KgBV24319CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1260 1000ND1200 ug/KgBV24319CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1254 10002100 1200 ug/KgBV24319CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1248 1000ND1200 ug/KgBV24319CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1232 1000ND1200 ug/KgBV24319CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1016 1000ND1200 ug/KgBV24319CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1242 1000ND1200 ug/KgBV24319CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1242 1000ND1100 ug/KgBV24320CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1248 10001400 1100 ug/KgBV24320CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1016 1000ND1100 ug/KgBV24320CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1221 1000ND1100 ug/KgBV24320CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1254 1000ND1100 ug/KgBV24320CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1260 1000ND1100 ug/KgBV24320CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1262 1000ND1100 ug/KgBV24320CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1268 1000ND1100 ug/KgBV24320CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1232 1000ND1100 ug/KgBV24320CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1248 10001000900 ug/KgBV24321CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1254 10002700700 ug/KgBV24323CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1242 1000ND3300 ug/KgBV24325CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1268 1000ND3300 ug/KgBV24325CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1262 1000ND3300 ug/KgBV24325CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1260 1000ND3300 ug/KgBV24325CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1248 1000ND3300 ug/KgBV24325CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1232 1000ND3300 ug/KgBV24325CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1221 1000ND3300 ug/KgBV24325CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1016 1000ND3300 ug/KgBV24325CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1254 1000ND3300 ug/KgBV24325CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 Sample Criteria Exceedences ReportMonday, October 03, 2016 Page 2 of 2 Acode Phoenix Analyte CriteriaResultRLSampNo AnalysisUnitsCriteria GBV24318 - NOBISCriteria:CT: I/C, RC RLCriteria State:CT $PCB_SOXR PCB-1254 10001800630 ug/KgBV24327CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 $PCB_SOXR PCB-1254 10003500710 ug/KgBV24337CT / PESTICIDES, PCB's, TPH, a / RES DEC (mg/kg)1000 PB-SM Lead 4008763.1 mg/KgBV24338CT / INORGANIC SUBSTANCES / RES DEC (mg/kg)400 PB-SM Lead 1000159034 mg/KgBV24339CT / INORGANIC SUBSTANCES / I/C DEC (mg/kg)1000 PB-SM Lead 400159034 mg/KgBV24339CT / INORGANIC SUBSTANCES / RES DEC (mg/kg)400 PB-SM Lead 4007963.0 mg/KgBV24340CT / INORGANIC SUBSTANCES / RES DEC (mg/kg)400 Phoenix Laboratories does not assume responsibility for the data contained in this report. It is provided as an additional tool to identify requested criteria exceedences. All efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of the data (obtained from appropriate agencies). A lack of exceedence information does not necessarily suggest conformance to the criteria. It is ultimately the site professional's responsibility to determine appropriate compliance. DEEP-REQ-APP-007 Page 1 of 6 Rev. 11/08/17 Request for Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB) State Listed Species Review Please complete this form in accordance with the instructions (DEEP-INST-007) to ensure proper handling of your request. There are no fees associated with NDDB Reviews. Part I: Preliminary Screening & Request Type Before submitting this request, you must review the most current Natural Diversity Data Base “State and Federal Listed Species and Significant Natural Communities Maps” found on the DEEP website. These maps are updated twice a year, usually in June and December. Does your site, including all affected areas, fall in an NDDB Area according to the map instructions: Yes No Enter the date of the map reviewed for pre-screening: Website 1-14-2019 This form is being submitted for a : New NDDB request Renewal/Extension of a NDDB Request, without modifications and within two years of issued NDDB determination (no attachments required) [CPPU Use Only - NDDB-Listed Species Determination # 1736] New Safe Harbor Determination (optional) must be associated with an application for a GP for the Discharge of Stormwater and Dewatering Wastewaters from Construction Activities Renewal/Extension of an existing Safe Harbor Determination With modifications Without modifications (no attachments required) [CPPU Use Only - NDDB-Safe Harbor Determination # 1736] Enter NDDB Determination Number for Renewal/Extension: Enter Safe Harbor Determination Number for Renewal/Extension: CPPU USE ONLY App #:____________________________ Doc #:____________________________ Check #: No fee required Program: Natural Diversity Database Endangered Species Hardcopy _____ Electronic _____ DEEP-REQ-APP-007 Page 2 of 6 Rev. 11/08/17 Part II: Requester Information *If the requester is a corporation, limited liability company, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or a statutory trust, it must be registered with the Secretary of State. If applicable, the name shall be stated exactly as it is registered with the Secretary of State. Please note, for those entities registered with the Secretary of State, the registered name will be the name used by DEEP. This information can be accessed at the Secretary of the State’s database CONCORD. (www.concord-sots.ct.gov/CONCORD/index.jsp) If the requester is an individual, provide the legal name (include suffix) in the following format: First Name; Middle Initial; Last Name; Suffix (Jr, Sr., II, III, etc.). If there are any changes or corrections to your company/facility or individual mailing or billing address or contact information, please complete and submit the Request to Change company/Individual Information to the address indicated on the form. 1. Requester* Company Name: Dakota Partners Contact Name: Scott Shaw Address: 1264 Main Street City/Town: Waltham State: MA Zip Code: 02451 Business Phone: 781-899-4002 ext. 301 **E-mail: sshaw@dakotapartners.net **By providing this email address you are agreeing to receive official correspondence from the department, at this electronic address, concerning this request. Please remember to check your security settings to be sure you can receive emails from “ct.gov” addresses. Also, please notify the department if your e-mail address changes a) Requester can best be described as: Individual Federal Agency State agency Municipality Tribal *business entity (* if a business entity complete i through iii): i) Check type corporation limited liability company limited partnership limited liability partnership statutory trust Other: ii) Provide Secretary of the State Business ID #: This information can be accessed at the Secretary of the State’s database (CONCORD). (www.concord-sots.ct.gov/CONCORD/index.jsp) iii) Check here if your business is NOT registered with the Secretary of State’s office. b) Acting as (Affiliation), pick one: Property owner Consultant Engineer Facility owner Applicant Biologist Pesticide Applicator Other representative: 2. List Primary Contact to receive Natural Diversity Data Base correspondence and inquiries, if different from requester. Company Name: Down To Earth, LLC Contact Person: Timothy Carr Title: LEP Mailing Address: 122 Church Street City/Town: Naugatuck State: CT Zip Code: 06770 Business Phone: 203-232-1061 ext. **E-mail: tim@downtoearthconsulting.com DEEP-REQ-APP-007 Page 3 of 6 Rev. 11/08/17 Part III: Site Information This request can only be completed for one site. A separate request must be filed for each additional site. 1. SITE NAME AND LOCATION Site Name or Project Name: Faria-Beede Instruments Town(s): Uncasville Street Address or Location Description: 42 Pink Row Size in acres, or site dimensions: 10.6-acres Latitude and longitude of the center of the site in decimal degrees (e.g., 41.23456 -71.68574): Latitude: 41.43606 N Longitude: 72.10646 Method of coordinate determination (check one): GPS Photo interpolation using CTECO map viewer Other (specify): 2a. Describe the current land use and land cover of the site. The Site is an active industrial facility which is planned for residential use. The land cover consists primarily of gravel parking lot at the area of proposed work. b. Check all that apply and enter the size in acres or % of area in the space after each checked category. Industrial/Commercial 98% Residential Forest Wetland Field/grassland Agricultural Water 2% Utility Right-of-way Transportation Right-of-way Other (specify): Part IV: Project Information 1. PROJECT TYPE: Choose Project Type: Residential development/Subdivision , If other describe: Temp Authorization to Discharge to Groundwater to Remediate Pollution 2. Is the subject activity limited to the maintenance, repair, or improvement of an existing structure within the existing footprint? Yes No If yes, explain. DEEP-REQ-APP-007 Page 4 of 6 Rev. 11/08/17 Part IV: Project Information (continued) 3. Give a detailed description of the activity which is the subject of this request and describe the methods and equipment that will be used. Include a description of steps that will be taken to minimize impacts to any known listed species. This NDDB request is being submitted per a "Temp Authorization to Discharge to Groundwater to Remediate Pollution". The Site is currently industrial and is regulated under RCRA Corrective Action. The Site is scheduled for residential redevelopment. A release of chlorinated solvents has contaminated soil and groundwater. The permit application proposes the subsurface discharge of chemical oxidant to groundwater. No daylighting or surface water discharge is allowed. The proposed activity will not affect threatened or endangered species. 4. If this is a renewal or extension of an existing Safe Harbor request with modifications, explain what about the project has changed. N/A 5. Provide a contact for questions about the project details if different from Part II primary contact. Name: Timothy Carr, LEP Phone: 203-232-1061 E-mail: tim@downtoearthconsulting.com DEEP-REQ-APP-007 Page 5 of 6 Rev. 11/08/17 Part V: Request Requirements and Associated Application Types Check one box from either Group 1, Group 2 or Group 3, indicating the appropriate category for this request. Group 1. If you check one of these boxes, complete Parts I – VII of this form and submit the required attachments A and B. Preliminary screening was negative but an NDDB review is still requested Request regards a municipally regulated or unregulated activity (no state permit/certificate needed) Request regards a preliminary site assessment or project feasibility study Request relates to land acquisition or protection Request is associated with a renewal of an existing permit or authorization, with no modifications Group 2. If you check one of these boxes, complete Parts I – VII of this form and submit required attachments A, B, and C. Request is associated with a new state or federal permit or authorization application or registration Request is associated with modification of an existing permit or other authorization Request is associated with a permit enforcement action Request regards site management or planning, requiring detailed species recommendations Request regards a state funded project, state agency activity, or CEPA request Group 3. If you are requesting a Safe Harbor Determination, complete Parts I-VII and submit required attachments A, B, and D. Safe Harbor determinations can only be requested if you are applying for a GP for the Discharge of Stormwater and Dewatering Wastewaters from Construction Activities If you are filing this request as part of a state or federal permit application(s) enter the application information below. Permitting Agency and Application Name(s): CTDEEP Remediation Division, Attn Drew Kuckucka for Temp Authorization to Discharge to Groundwater to Remediate Pollution Related State DEEP Permit Number(s), if applicable: Not issued yet State DEEP Enforcement Action Number, if applicable: Consent Order 3375/337 State DEEP Permit Analyst(s)/Engineer(s), if known: Drew Kuckucka Is this request related to a previously submitted NDDB request? Yes No If yes, provide the previous NDDB Determination Number(s), if known: DEEP-APP-007C 1 of 1 Rev. 04/08/14 Attachment C: Supplemental Information, Group 2 requirement Section i: Supplemental Site Information 1. Existing Conditions Describe all natural and man-made features including wetlands, watercourses, fish and wildlife habitat, floodplains and any existing structures potentially affected by the subject activity. Such features should be depicted and labeled on the site plan that must be submitted. Photographs of current site conditions may be helpful to reviewers. The subject Site is an approximately 10.6-acre industrial property located in Uncasville, Connecticut. The property is occupied by eleven mill buildings, many of which are interconnected and several which span Oxoboxo Brook. The Site coordinates are 41° 26’ 11.45” north latitude and -72° 6’ 26.67” west longitude. The Site is in a mixed industrial, commercial, and residential area. An Area Plan is provided as Figure 1 and a Site Plan as Figure 2. The property includes approximately 100,000 square-feet of manufacturing, warehouse and distribution space. The facility was initially constructed as a woolen mill in the 19th century with construction of buildings over time prior to Faria’s purchase of the property in 1964. Since 1964, the buildings have been used for the manufacture of analog and digital engine monitoring instruments used in a variety of marine, military, construction and related equipment. The property has ten mostly interconnected buildings which are designated: M-4/4A, M-5, M-6, M-7, M-8, M- 10/10A, M-11, M-12, M-13 and M-14 on Figure 2. Most of the buildings are one to two story brick structures. The remainder of the property consists of paved and unpaved employee parking, loading and unloading areas, and an area of recently imported fill. An approximately one-half acre area of imported fill forms a plateau approximately eight feet above the surrounding grade in the southeast corner of the Site. Faria Beede maintains a groundwater pump and treat system which recovers groundwater from approximately six extraction wells located in AOC-6, east of Building M-13. The collected groundwater is pretreated for elevated CVOCs through a tray aerator and carbon system prior to discharge to Oxoboxo Brook. The water is also used for non-contact cooling water in molding machines prior to discharge under a NPDES permit issued by the CTDEEP. Picker Pond is located immediately west of the Site across Route 32 and is formed by a dam on Oxoboxo Brook The dam supplied hydro power to the historic textile mill operations which operated on the Site since the mid-1800s. Remnants of various head races and tail races remain on-site. Currently, the Oxoboxo channel goes through the central portion of the Site, is culverted below Pink Row on the eastern Site boundary, and drains into Gairs Pond located approximately 500 feet to the east. Gair’s Pond discharges to the Thames River located 2,300 feet to the east. The area east of Gairs Pond is mapped by the CTDEEP to be tidally influenced. Site Photographs (optional) attached Site Plan/sketch of existing conditions attached 2. Biological Surveys Has a biologist visited the site and conducted a biological survey to determine the presence of any endangered, threatened or special concern species Yes No If yes, complete the following questions and submit any reports of biological surveys, documentation of the biologist’s qualifications, and any NDDB survey forms. Biologist(s) name: Habitat and/or species targeted by survey: Dates when surveys were conducted: DEEP-APP-007C 1 of 1 Rev. 04/08/14 Reports of biological surveys attached Documentation of biologist’s qualifications attached NDDB Survey forms for any listed species observations attached Section ii: Supplemental Project Information 1. Provide a schedule for all phases of the project including the year, the month and/or season that the proposed activity will be initiated and the duration of the activity. Public Notice March 2019 Pre-Injection Groundwater Sampling Week of April 6th, 2019 Implementation of ISCO-IRM April 15-30, 2019 Restore Pump & Treat System June 2019 Post-Injection Groundwater Sampling (Quarterly for one year) May, August, December 2019, and March 2020 Annual Report May 2020 2. Describe and quantify the proposed changes to existing conditions and describe any on-site or off-site impacts. In addition, provide an annotated site plan detailing the areas of impact and proposed changes to existing conditions. The In-situ Chemical Oxidation Interim Remedial Action will not impact ecological resources. Annotated Site Plan attached FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT NO.QUADRANGLE LOCATION LOCUS PLAN Thomas G. Faria Corporation 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 91730.00 DATE: September 2016 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 INCH = 2,000 FEET Uncasville, CT September 2016 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP HELTCO6567PRI-M215BRIDGEOHW CPCO6564CL&P6255CL&P6256POLE12793POLE2746SNET2952SIGNLP TANKSLPCL&P2744SIGNPRI-M216SIGN UTUTUT CL&P2745SIGNA/CGUTGGAREA463,658 S.F.10.6441 AC.UTUTUTUTM H ' SOHW TRANSPADUTSIGNFLAGPOLESGUTOHW UT RW - 1 0 1 GROUNDWATER RECOVERYSYSTEM (RW-101)HELTCO6566HELTCO6565GG16" GGG GG16"16"16" G . M . O H WPOLEPOLEHELTCO6568HELTCO6570A/CTRANSPRI-M217SUPPORTPOLES UTA/CLPLPUT UT UTUTSoil VaporExtraction SystemTrailerSITE PLANFARIA INDUSTRIES42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:VTITFC91730.00jAMUARY 2019FIGURE 20100'200'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETNOTES:1. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASEMAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES3. ECD IMAGE FROM HIGH RESOLUTION SITECHARACTERIZATION RESULTS PUBLISHED BY AEI, 2014.LEGENDAPPROXIMATE MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONMW-1MW-200MW-202RMW-202PZMW-205SMW-205DMW-201MW-204DMW-204SMW-4RMW-4DMW-4R2PZ-3PZ-2PZ-1MW-3RMW-104MW-2MW-102RW-120MW-103MW-105OXOBOXOBROOKOXOBOXOBROOKAREA 1AREA 2AREA 3AREA 4AREA 6CLEAN FILL AREAREMEDIATION TARGET AREAS OF CONCERN:1. FORMER AST AND PAH IMPACTED SOIL2. METALS IMPACTED SOIL IN ALLEY3. PAH, METALS AND VOC IMPACTED SOIL (EXTERIOR)4. VOC IMPACTED SOIL (INTERIOR)5. LIMITED PAHS IN OXOBOXO BROOK SEDIMENTS6. VOC IMPACTED SOIL AND FORMER ONSITE SEPTIC TANKAND FIELDAREA 1AREA OF CLEAN FILLPLACED 2016(10 FT HIGH +/-)TELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERSVE WELLGROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREATWELLSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLSRW-101RW-301SRW-302SRW-303DRW-303SRW-304SRW-301SAREA 50100'200'AREA OF CONCERNSEE NOTE 3SV-1 GRAN. MS.W/DRILL HOLEBROKENCHDGRAN. MS.W/DRILL HOLEHELTCO6567PRI-M215EXIST.CHDBRIDGEOHW CPCO6564CL&P6255CL&P6256POLE12793POLE2746SNET2952SIGNLP TANKSLPCL&P2744SIGNPRI-M216SIGN UTUTUTW CL&P2745SIGNA/CGWUTGGWAREA463,658 S.F.10.6441 AC.ELC- UGNDOHWTRANSPADUTW SIGNFLAGPOLESGUTOHW UT WGWWWAPPROX. LOC. 6" W.M.WWAPPROX. LOC. 8" W.M.WWWAPPROX. LOC. 6" W.M.WHELTCO6566HELTCO6565WWWWWAPPROX.LOC.12"&16"W.M.WWW W WWW W W12"&16"WWW12"&16"W W6" GG16" GGG GG16"16"16" G . M .WWWW 6"6" W.M.O H W W W12"&16" W.M.POLEPOLEHELTCO6568HELTCO6570A/CTRANSWAPPROX. LOC . 6" W .M.PRI-M217SUPPORTPOLES WW WWELL UTWUTWWVUTA/CWGLPLPWWWVW WWW W WUT UT UTUTWWW Soil VaporExtraction SystemTrailerELC- UGNDELC- UGNDLP TANKSLPCL&PCL&P27452745ELC- UGNDELC- UGNDOHWUT WWPOLEPOLEA/CTRANSWAPPROX. LOC . 6" W .M.APPROX. LOC . 6" W .M.APPROX. LOC . 6" W .M.ELC- UGNDELC- UGNDELC- UGNDELC- UGNDPROPOSED IN-SITU CHEMICALOXIDATION TREATMENT AREAFARIA INDUSTRIES42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:VTITFC91730.00JANUARY 2019FIGURE 30100'200'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETNOTES:1. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASEMAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES3. ELECTRON CAPTURE DEVICE IMAGE FROM HIGHRESOLUTION SITE CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS PUBLISHEDBY AEI, 2014.LEGENDAPPROXIMATE MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONMW-200MW-202RMW-202PZMW-205SMW-205DMW-201MW-204DMW-204SMW-4RMW-4DMW-4R2PZ-3PZ-2PZ-1MW-3RMW-104MW-2MW-102RW-120MW-103MW-105OXOBOXOBROOKOXOBOXOBROOKCLEAN FILL AREALIST OF AOCs:1. FORMER AST AND PAH IMPACTED SOIL2. METALS IMPACTED SOIL IN ALLEY3. PAH, METALS AND VOC IMPACTED SOIL (EXTERIOR)4. VOC IMPACTED SOIL (INTERIOR)5. LIMITED PAHS IN OXOBOXO BROOK SEDIMENTS6. SOUTHERN PARKING LOT - VOC IMPACTED SOIL ANDFORMER SEPTIC TANK AND LEACH FIELDTELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERSVE WELLGROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREATWELLSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLSRW-101RW-301SRW-302SRW-303DRW-303SRW-304SAREA OF PROPOSED CHEMICALINJECTIONSSEE NOTE 3DAK-2 S/DRW-304SDAK-3 S/DPROPOSED GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELLS(SHALLOW/DEEP)Recovery WellManifold Vault(UNGD)SVE-2SVE-1DAK-2 S/DMW-200RW-301SSVE-2 BRIDGESMHTF=23.66LP TANKSLPCL&P2744R.O .SIGN25x8CL&P2745ELC- UGNDRAMPOHWUT WGWWSANLATINV=13.06(IN S)WWW12"&16"GGG G16"16 " G. M .WWW6"6" W.M.POLEPOLEBUILDING M-10BUILDING M-13UILDING M-12CHIMNEYFFL=29.95A/CTRANSWAPPROX. LOC. 6" W.M.BUILDING M-10APAVILLIONROOFELC- UGNDELC- UGNDIN-SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATIONTREATMENT AREA DETAILFARIA INDUSTRIES42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:VTITFC91730.00JANUARY 2019FIGURE 4ANOTES:1. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASE MAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES3. ELECTRON CAPTURE DEVICE IMAGE FROM HIGHRESOLUTION SITE CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS PUBLISHEDBY AEI, 2014.LEGENDAPPROXIMATE MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONMW-1CLEAN FILL AREATELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERGROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREATWELLSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLS030'60'MW-205SMW-205DMW-4RMW-4DMW-4R2PZ-3PZ-2PZ-1MW-3RMW-104MW-2OXOBOXOBROOKRW-301SRW-302SRW-303DRW-303S030'60'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETRW-101SVE-2SVE-1Recovery WellManifold Vault(UNGD)TREATMENT AREAAPPROXIMATELY 18,000 SQFTMW-10SMW-10DMW-M9SDAK-1 S/DDAK-2 S/DDAK-3 S/DRW-101SV-1DAK-1 S/DPROPOSED GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELL (SHALLOW/DEEP)TREATMENT AREAAPPROXIMATELY 2,000 SQFT BRIDGESMHTF=23.66LP TANKSLPCL&P2744R.O .SIGN25x8CL&P2745ELC- UGNDRAMPOHWUT WGWWSANLATINV=13.06(IN S)WWW12"&16"GGG G16"16 " G. M .WWW6"6" W.M.POLEPOLEBUILDING M-10BUILDING M-13UILDING M-12CHIMNEYFFL=29.95A/CTRANSWAPPROX. LOC. 6" W.M.BUILDING M-10APAVILLIONROOFELC- UGNDELC- UGNDCL&PCL&P2745POLECL&PCL&P27452745UGNDDOHWEELLC-ULLCC-UUGGNNDEELLCC-UGNDDRAMPEELLRAMPPOLE9.95FFL=2A/CLPUT UILDINGM-13TRANSTRANSPAVILLIONLPTANKSWWBUWOC.6"W.M.PAVILLIONROOF12X.LOIN-SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATIONTREATMENT AREA DETAILFARIA INDUSTRIES42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:VTITFC91730.00JANUARY 2019FIGURE 4B030'60'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETNOTES:1. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASE MAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES3. ELECTRON CAPTURE DEVICE IMAGE FROM HIGHRESOLUTION SITE CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS PUBLISHEDBY AEI, 2014.LEGENDAPPROXIMATE MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONMW-1CLEAN FILL AREATELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERGROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREATWELLSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLS030'60'MW-205SMW-205DMW-4RMW-4DMW-4R2PZ-3PZ-2PZ-1MW-3RMW-104MW-2OXOBOXOBROOKRW-301SRW-302SRW-303DRW-303SRW-101SVE-2SVE-1Recovery WellManifold Vault(UNGD)TREATMENT AREAAPPROXIMATELY 18,000 SQFTMW-10SMW-10DMW-M9SDAK-1 S/DDAK-2 S/DDAK-3 S/DRW-101SV-1DAK-1 S/DPROPOSED GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELL (SHALLOW/DEEP)TREATMENT AREAAPPROXIMATELY 2,000 SQFT FariaBuildingGneiss/Granitic GneissMW-10DMW-4RRW-101RW-303DMW-205DMW-314DMW-10SRW-303SMW-205S23 Pink RowSiltBedrockGW Table NOTES:MW-314SAA'SepticWell Grout Casing Installed in Bedrock 65-75'20' NOffset distance and direction from A-A'MW-10sScreenMonitoring WellDesignationSB-405SB-400SB-406SiltSand and GravelSand and Gravel10' SVTIProject:GEOLOGIC PROFILE A-A'PROPOSED ISCO AREAFARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUTNovember 2018FIGURE 5Checked by:TFCDate:LEGEND:1. See figure for location of profile.2. Profile is based on boring logs for MW-4R, RW-101, RW-303S/D, SB-400, SB-406, SB-405, and MW-314S/D. Boring logs were not available for MW-10S/D and MW-205S/D3. Dashed lines show inferred geologic profile and groundwater table elevations where data are missing.4. Groundwater elevation do not reflect pumping conditions.Drawn by: Notes: Data obtained from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data download web page and Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online (CT ECO). The information was obtained from an internet download on October 10, 2018. SURFICIAL GEOLOGY FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS INC 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT Scale: See Map Figure No. 6 Drawn By: ANE Checked By: TFC Site 42 Pink Row Sand and Gravel Overlying Sand Gravel Overlying Sand and Gravel Overlying Sand Alluvium Overlying Sand and Gravel Coarse Gravel Glacial Till Notes: Data obtained from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data download web page and Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online (CT ECO). The information was obtained from an internet download on January 14, 2019. 122 Church Street Naugatuck, CT NATURAL DIVERSITY DATBASE AREA AND GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATIONS FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT Scale: Approximately 1” = 600’ Figure No. 7 Drawn By: NBK Checked By: TFC Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 1 Description: Historic photograph looking to the southwest of M-4/M-4a to the right and M-7 on the left based on a post card dated 1909. At the time, the Site housed a textile mill which specialized in the manufacture of mohair plushes. Description: View of the southern portion of the Site (from the area of fill placed in 2017) looking towards the northwest. Building M-14 is in the foreground. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 2 Description: View looking to the southwest of Building M-8 which contains offices, looking towards the west. Description: View of Oxoboxo Brook looking to the west from Building M-12. Building M-4 is visible in the upper right hand side of the photograph. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 3 Description: Photograph of Building M-6 which houses a 10,000-gallon fuel oil aboveground storage tank. The tank is no longer used and reportedly contains petroleum sludge. Description: View of an instrument assembly area located in Building M-11. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 4 Description: Photograph of machining area located in Building M-10. Description: Three inactive electrical transformers were observed in the courtyard and on the north exterior wall of Building M-13. The transformers were not marked with respect to PCBs and their ownership is also not known. PCB impacts have not been identified in soil samples obtained below the transformers. Site Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Faria Beede 42 Pink Row Uncasville, CT Page 5 Description: Photograph of three active electrical transformers enclosed by chain link fence located on a concrete pad on the west side of the power house (Building M-14). These transformers are mark non-PCB and are believed to be owned by the electric utility. Description: A groundwater pump and treatment system is located in the basement of Building M- 13. The remedial system was designed to prevent the off-site migration of groundwater contaminated by chlorinated solvents. Groundwater is pumped from recovery well RW-101, through a tray aerator and then through activated carbon. Treated water is discharged to Oxoboxo Brook in accordance with a state discharge permit. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 1 of 19 7/31/2012 Application for Emergency or Temporary Authorization to Discharge to Groundwater to Remediate Pollution Please complete this form in accordance with the instructions (DEEP-REM-GWP-INS-600) to ensure the proper handling of your application. Print or type unless otherwise noted. You must submit the application fee along with this form. Part I: Application Information A. This application is for (check one): A Temporary Authorization (TA) [#1746] An Emergency Authorization (EA) [#1747] B. This application is for A new authorization A modification* * C. Existing permit/authorization/registration ID DEEP REMEDIATION USE ONLY D. City or Town where site is located: Uncasville RemGIS RemID scanned E. Brief Description of Project: Interm remedial action to mitigate residual chlorinated solvents in the area of a former septic system and other hotspots. Part II: Fee Information: The application will not be processed without the fee. The fee shall be non- refundable and shall be paid by check or money order to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. The Base Fee is $1,500; There is no charge for modifications. FEE ENCLOSED $ 1,500 A 50% discount applies if the applicant is a municipality: Municipality Reduction Taken (CGS 22a-6(b)) Single family residence homeowners may request a waiver of the fee, even if they are not an applicant: Single Family Residence Waiver* (Complete signature box below) * I am the owner of a single family residence which is the location where the pollution that is to be remediated originates, and I request a fee waiver. ____________________________________ Homeowner’s Signature CPPU USE ONLY App #:________________________________ Doc #:________________________________ Check #:______________________________ Program: Remediation Groundwater Discharge DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 2 of 19 7/31/2012 Part III-A: Applicant Information • *If an applicant is a corporation, limited liability company, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or a statutory trust, it must be registered with the Secretary of State. If applicable, applicant’s name shall be stated exactly as it is registered with the Secretary of State. Please note, for those entities registered with the Secretary of State, The registered name will be the name used by DEEP. This information can be accessed at the Secretary of State’s database (CONCORD). http://www.concord-sots.ct.gov/CONCORD/index.jsp. • If an applicant is an individual, provide the legal name (include suffix) in the following format: First Name; Middle Initial; Last Name; Suffix (Jr, Sr., II, III, etc.). 1. Applicant: Dakota Partners Mailing Address: 1264 Main Street City/Town: Waltham State: MA Zip Code: 02451 Business Phone: 781-899-4002 ext.: 301 Contact Person: Scott Shaw Phone: 781-899-4002 ext. 301 *E-Mail: sshaw@dakotapartners.net *By providing this e-mail address you are agreeing to receive official correspondence from the Department, at this electronic address, concerning the subject application. Please remember to check your security settings to be sure you can receive e-mails from “ct.gov” addresses. Also, please notify the Department if your e-mail address changes. a) Applicant Type (check one): individual federal agency state agency municipality tribal *business entity (*If a business entity complete i through iii) i) check type: corporation limited liability company limited partnership limited liability partnership statutory trust Other: ii) provide Secretary of the State business ID #: (Information accessible through the CONCORD database at http://www.concord-sots.ct.gov/CONCORD/index.jsp) iii) Check here if you are not registered with the Secretary of State’s office. b) Applicant’s interest in property at which the proposed activity is to be located: site owner option holder lessee easement holder operator other (specify): Check if there are any co-applicants. If so, provide, for each such additional party, the information requested above. Space is provided on page 3 for the property owner and on page 4 for non-property- owners who are co-applicants. 2. Billing contact, if different than the applicant. Name: Same as applicant Mailing Address: City/Town: State: Zip Code: Business Phone: ext. Contact Person: Phone: ext. Title: Email: If there are any changes or corrections to your company/facility or individual name, mailing or billing address, or contact information, please complete and submit the Request to Change Company/Individual Information to the address indicated on the form. For any other changes you must contact the specific program from which you hold a current DEEP license. If there is a change in ownership, contact the Permit Assistance Office for questions concerning license transfers at 860-424-3003. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 3 of 19 7/31/2012 Part III-B: Additional Party Information 1. Owner of primary parcel where activity will occur, if different than applicant: N/A: Same as applicant Check if primary parcel owner is a co-applicant, and ensure an applicant certification is included. Name: Faria-Beede Instruments, Inc. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 983 City/Town: Uncasville State: CT Zip Code: 06382 Contact Person: Fred Merrit Title: CEO Contact Phone: 860-848-9271 ext.: *Email: Fewdm@faria-instruments.com *If a co-applicant, by providing this e-mail address you are agreeing to receive official correspondence from the Department, at this electronic address, concerning the subject application. Please remember to check your security settings to be sure you can receive e-mails from “ct.gov” addresses. Also, please notify the Department if your e-mail address changes. If primary parcel owner is neither an applicant nor co-applicant, describe how owner has granted permission and access. Access Summary: Permission is part of a purchase and sale agreement. Applicant will be the property owner before the field work is initiated. 2. List the primary technical contact (professional employed or retained to assist in preparing the application and/or to design or supervise the activity): Same as applicant Name: Timothy Carr LEP P.E Firm: Down To Earth, LLC License number: 118 Mailing Address: 122 Church Street City/Town: Naugatuck State: CT Zip Code: 06770 Contact Person: Timothy Carr Title: Principal Contact Phone: 203-232-1061 ext.: *Email: tim @downtoearthconsulting.com *By providing this e-mail address you are agreeing that this contact you have identified may receive official correspondence from the Department, at this electronic address, concerning the subject application. Please ask this contact to check their security settings to be sure they can receive e-mails from “ct.gov” addresses. Also, please ask them to notify the Department if their e-mail address changes. Service Provided: Review of existing conditions and ISCO remedial design and permitting. 3. In the space on the following page, identify other parties who DEEP should be aware of regarding this project, other than owners of parcels in addition to the primary parcel, which instead must be included in Table 1 (page 9). DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 4 of 19 7/31/2012 Identification of Additional Parties [Expandable text entry area for users of electronic form] This Site is under RCRA Corrective Action. Stephanie Carr of EPA New England has significant experience with the site. This interim remedial action is intended to mitigate impacts to downgradient private property owners at 15, 19, 23, and 31 Pink Row. These property owners are listed on Table 1 and will be provided with public notice. Part IV: Site Location and Additional Parcels 1. Identify, for the primary parcel associated with the area of proposed activity: Name of site: Faria-Beede Instruments, Inc. Is this name of the site the same as the name of the applicant? Yes No Is this the site of origin for the pollution being remediated? Yes No Street Address or Description of Location: 42 Pink Row City/Town: Uncasville State: CT Zip Code: 06382 Tax Assessor's Reference: Map: 074 Block: 038 Lot: 000 Latitude and longitude of the center of the proposed activity (in degrees, minutes, and seconds or in decimal degrees): Latitude: 41.43621 N Longitude: 72.10642 W Method of determination (check one): GPS USGS Map CTECO Other (specify): 2. Character of primary parcel (Check all that apply): Retail/commercial Industrial/manufacturing Other nonresidential (specify below) Single family residence Up to four residential units Other residential Explanation: Property is proposed for residential development. 3. Will the area of the proposed activity area or expected zone of influence extend beyond the boundary of the primary parcel identified above? Yes No If yes, Identify in Table 1 (on page 9) any other affected parcels and the owners of such other parcels, and indicate that you have obtained appropriate access permission. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 5 of 19 7/31/2012 Part V-A: Site Information- Site Setting 1. Check all that apply to any parcel, in whole or in part, that includes an area of proposed activity or any part of the expected zone of influence (consult the instructions for additional information): A. Is within the coastal area as defined in CGS section 22a-94 (a), Is within the coastal boundary as delineated on DEEP approved coastal boundary maps. If within the coastal boundary, and this application is for a new authorization or for a modification of an existing permit, you must submit a Coastal Consistency Review Form (DEP-APP-004) with your application as Attachment G. B. Is located on federally recognized Indian lands. C. Is subject to conservation or preservation restriction. If applicable, proof of written notice of this application to the holder of such restriction or a letter from the holder of such restriction verifying that this application is in compliance with the terms of the restriction, must be submitted as Attachment H. D. Is located within an area identified as a habitat for endangered, threatened or special concern species as identified on the "State and Federal Listed Species and Natural Communities Map". Date of Map: 1/14/2019 If applicable, complete and submit a Connecticut Natural Diversity Data Base (CT NDDB) Review Request Form (DEP-APP-007) to the address specified on the form. Please note NDDB review generally takes 4 to 6 weeks and may require additional documentation from the applicant. DEEP strongly recommends that applicants complete this process before submitting the subject application. When submitting this application, please include copies of any correspondence to and from the NDDB, including copies of the completed CT NDDB Review Request Form, as Attachment I. None of the above applies to any parcel that is the subject of this application. 2. Check all that apply to any part of the area of proposed activity, including access and support activity, or any part of the expected zone of influence: Is within 100 feet of any watercourse, coastal water, inland wetland, or tidal wetland. Is located within any identified floodplain; or within stream channel encroachment lines. Neither of the above applies to any area that is the subject of this application. 3. Provide, for the nearest downgradient stream or surface water body: A. Name of stream or water body: Oxoboxo Brook/Gair's Pond B. Distance (feet) from zone of influence: ~100 ft C. Surface water quality goal, as identified in the Connecticut Water Quality Standards adopted pursuant to CGS section 22a-426: AA A B C D + Coastal (S prefix) 4. Is any part of the area of proposed activity, including the predicted zone of influence, located within 1 mile of any public water supply well? Yes No DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 6 of 19 7/31/2012 Part V-B: Site Information- Regulatory Framework 1. Identify any remedial program creating an obligation to conduct remediation: A. Check all that apply to the primary parcel: List Associated DEEP ID numbers: CGS 22a-133x or CGS 22a-133y CGS 22a-134a (Prop. Transfer) 9532 RCSA 22a-449(c)-105(h) (RCRA Corr. Act.) CTD043038744 RCSA 22a-449(d)-(106) (UST Corr. Act.) Under a Pollution Abatement Order (CGS 22a-432) 3375/3376 Brownfield program (specify) None of the above applies to the primary parcel. B. For any other parcels where the zone of influence is present: N/A-No other parcels Some of the above apply to a parcel other than the primary parcel. If so, list on Table 1. None of the above applies to any other parcel in the area of activity or zone of influence. 2. For sites in a remedial program, or under any active oversight by DEEP LUST program, identify: A. LEP lead DEEP lead Not determined Not in a remedial program B. Name of supervising LEP: Alfred N. Kovalik License Number: 387 C. Name of DEEP project lead (if not LEP lead): Drew Kukucka 3. Identify programs that may apply or impose regulatory requirements: A Check all that apply to the primary parcel: List Associated ID numbers: Regulated under RCRA Subtitle C / CGS 22a-449(c) (HW) CTD043038744 Regulated under RCRA Subtitle D / CGS 22a-208a (SW) Regulated under RCRA Subtitle I / CGS 22a-449(d) (USTs) Issued a Water Discharge Permit under CGS 22a-430 GTC000220/GGR001229 (excluding stormwater discharge permits) None of the above applies to the primary parcel. B. For any other parcels where the zone of influence is present: N/A-No other parcels Some of the above apply to a parcel other than the primary parcel. If so, list on Table 1. None of the above applies to any other parcel in the area of activity or zone of influence. 4. Other programs: Identify any additional DEEP programs (not already noted above) or other governmental agencies that should be contacted when DEEP staff review this application: The Site is proposed for residential redevelopment under a CHFA grant. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 7 of 19 7/31/2012 Part V-C: Site Information- Relation to Water Supplies 1. Proximity to Public Water Supplies (PWS): Check all that apply for any part of the area of proposed activity or anticipated zone of influence: Within an aquifer protection area: Level A Level B Within a public water supply source water area: Surface Water Watershed Groundwater Well Source Water Area Upon water company owned land: Land Class: 1 2 3 If any apply, provide PWS ID number(s): If any apply, a duplicate or certified copy of the application and the supporting documents must be filed with the Drinking Water Section of the Department of Public Health. Check here to certify that a copy was sent. None of the above applies to any part of the area of proposed activity or anticipated zone of influence. 2. Identify the groundwater quality goal(s), adopted in the Connecticut Water Quality Standards pursuant to CGS section 22a-426, for any part of the area of proposed activity or anticipated zone of influence: GAA GAAs GA GB Other (specify): 3. Proximity to water supply wells: Check all that apply for any part of the area of proposed activity or anticipated zone of influence: Located within 1000 feet of a public water supply well. Within 200 feet of any water supply well pumping over 10 gallons per minute. Within 75 feet of any water supply well not owned by applicant or primary parcel owner. A water supply well owned by applicant or primary parcel owner is within 75 feet. If any apply, a duplicate or certified copy of the application form must be filed with the local director of health. Check here to certify that a copy was sent. None of the above applies to area of proposed activity or anticipated zone of influence. 4. A. List in Table 2 on page 9 of this application all public water supply wells within 1000 feet and all water supply wells within 500 feet of the proposed activity or anticipated zone of influence. Indicate if no wells were identified for listing: No wells are identified. B. Identify how the list was developed, or basis for determining no wells were present: Well inventory conducted: Year: 2016 and prior Other (explain below) Explanation: The last private water well in the vicinity was connected to the municipal system on June 7, 2016, just prior to the CTDEEP's approval of a groundwater reclassification to GB in late 2016/early 2017. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 8 of 19 7/31/2012 Part V-D: Site Information- Environmental Effect Mitigation (see instructions) Identify potential adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity on the site setting and receptors identified above in parts V-A and V-C and how these effects will be prevented. Also describe how these effects, should they occur, will be identified and mitigated, with particular attention to, but not limited to, a discussion of protection of water supply wells. Check here if continuation sheet is needed, and label and attach it to this sheet. Potential adverse effects have been identified to Oxoboxo Brook, which lies immediately north of the subject area, and downgradient residential properties at 15, 19, 23, 27 and 31 Pink Row. Adverse effects to subsurface utilities must also be minimized. 1. Potential adverse effects to Oxoboxo Brook from ISCO treatment of groundwater will be prevented by minimizing the mounding of groundwater at the oxidant injection points located closest to the surface water. The change in groundwater pH, temperature, specific conductance, and ORP will be monitored in the injection area. The surface water pH, temperature, specific conductance, and ORP will be monitored immediately adjacent to the injection area. The majority of the volume of oxidant injection will be below the elevation of the brook (treatment zone of 17 to 60 feet below grade). Injections will not be performed within the area of influence of storm sewers. 2. Potential adverse effects to Pink Row residences from ISCO treatment of groundwater will be prevented by monitoring and minimizing the strength and amount of oxidant present in groundwater migrating to the adjacent properties. The installation of two deep/shallow pairs of sentinel monitoring wells, downgradient of the treatment area and within the easement of Pink Row, are proposed on Figure 4. Groundwater pH, temperature, specific conductance, and ORP will be monitored in the injection and downgradient area to evaluate changing aquifer conditions. The majority of the volume of oxidant injection will be below the elevation of the residential basements (treatment zone of 17 to 30 feet below grade). 3. Potential adverse effects to subsurface utilities will be prevented by minimizing the amount of oxidant injected adjacent to and near the elevation of the utilities identified on Figure 4. By injecting oxidant below the elevation of the utilities (greater than 6 feet below grade), the potential to effect utilities will be minimized. It is expected that the majority of the volume of oxidant injection will be below the elevation of the residential basements (treatment zone of 17 to 60 feet below grade). DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 9 of 19 7/31/2012 Table 1 Listing of Additional Parcels that include any part of the proposed activity or zone of influence (Consult instructions, and see questions IV.3, V-B.1.B and V-B.3.B) [Expandable text entry area for users of electronic form] Map/Block/Lot Address Owner Phone Character Permission 070/114/000 15 Pink Row, Uncasville Alfonso & Ginny Agolio Downgradient private residence Pending 074/044/000 19 Pink Row, Uncasville Provvidenza A Langella Downgradient private residence Pending 074/043/000 23 Pink Row, Uncasville Troy & Jessica Boyer Downgradient private residence Pending 074/042/000 27 Pink Row, Uncasville Elsie Hamilton Downgradient private residence Pending Table 2 Identified Water Supply Wells (Consult instructions, and see question V-C.4) [Expandable text entry area for users of electronic form] Address Contact Name Phone Well/System type Distance from ZOI Remarks No Active Wells Remain DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 10 of 19 7/31/2012 Part VI-A: Detailed Information- Site and Pollution 1. Sensitive Site Receptors: Check all that apply within 25 feet of any part of the activity area or zone of influence; and explain in part VI-D how impact on identified receptors will be limited: Leaching system present. Coastal water, tidal wetland, inland wetland or watercourse present. Underground public utility present. Subsurface stormwater collection or management system present. Private utility or subsurface structure present. Occupied basement present. Occupied structure present and volatile organic chemicals are present as a CoC. None of the above is present in or within 25 feet of any part of the area of activity or zone of influence. 2. Pollution Presence: Check all that apply: (provide discussion as needed in part VI-D) A. Evidence of a release that discharge is proposed to treat: Quantitative Qualitative No evidence of release Identify nature of evidence: Soil and groundwater sampling results Identify mechanism for release: Releases to septic system and probable surface storage in containers B. Nature of pollution that activity is proposed to treat: Petroleum Fuel Organic Solvent (specify) PCE and breakdown products Metals (specify) Other (specify) C. Nature and origin of Petroleum Fuel Pollution: Not applicable; no petroleum fuel pollution Heating Oil Other Petroleum Fuel (specify) Yes No Pollution being remediated is associated with release from a tank with a capacity equal to or less than 2,100 gallons in size. Yes No Release is associated with a heating oil tank. D. Evaluation of Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (NAPL): Yes No Don’t Know or Not Applicable (provide discussion of either in part VI-D) Presence of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) has been evaluated. NAPL likely is or was present at the location of the proposed activity. Basis for answer: CTRSR Cnap over 1% soluability product encountered Other (specify) Removal actions have been implemented for any NAPL present. (Summarize actions and results achieved in part VI-D discussion) E. Contamination (non-natural) other than the target pollutant is present: Yes No If yes, Identify nature: Additional AOCs Polluted Fill/Urban Soil Other Describe: DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 11 of 19 7/31/2012 3. Hydrogeology: Check all that apply: Yes No Don’t Know or Not Applicable (provide discussion of either in part VI-D) Water table is less than 15 feet above the bedrock surface. Flow velocity is determined: State horizontal flow velocity: 1.8 to 2.7 ft/day Activity is within the area of influence of a high-yield (10 gpm) well. Temporal flow variation exists: seasonal pumpage related Significant vertical flow exists: State gradient ratio V:H:: .033 to .094 ft/ft Preferential flow pathways have been identified. Aquifer heterogeneity was evaluated and considered in remediation design. Explanations: Groundwater heads and velocities are variable due to active groundwater recovery wells. Recovery wells will be off during oxidant injections to reduce velocities. 4. Hydrogeochemistry: Check all that apply: Yes No Don’t Know or Not Applicable (provide discussion of either in part VI-D) Groundwater contains more than 10,000 mg/l petroleum or over 100 ppm VOCs. Vertical contaminant distribution is known and considered in remedial design. Groundwater/aquifer chemistry has been considered in design dosage. Potential interactions with/mobilization of aquifer matrix may occur. Potential interactions with other pollutants present may occur. Intermediate or by-products may be generated. End, intermediate, or by-products may have environmental effects. Explanations: In general, chlorinated VOC concentrations in groundwater are dilute. Based on data collected by AECOM in 2008 and AEI in 2012 (MIPs) the highest concentration of contaminants appear to reside in a discontinuous silt layer located between approximately 17 and 21 feet below grade and at depth (near bedrock at 60 fbg +/-). 5. Zone of Influence: Describe how the zone of influence depicted on the site map was determined: The ZOI is intended to cover the areas identified as having elevated chlorinated solvents in 2008 soil borings by AECOM and 2012 MIPs investigation by AEI. The target areas are shown on Figues 4A and 4B. 6. Imminent Threat: If applying for an Emergency Authorization, explain why the presence of the pollution described above presents an imminent threat to human health or the environment: No imminent threat exists. This temporary authorization is being submitted for CTDEEP request to coordinate the shutting down of the pump and treat system and implement multi-phase in-situ chemical oxidation and then reduction chemical injections to treat groundwater. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 12 of 19 7/31/2012 Part VI-B: Detailed Information- Activity Proposed 1. Objective and Scope: Check all that apply: A. Identify the general discharge objective: Pilot Test Source Control Remediation Other Explain: Mitigate residual chlorinated VOCs (PCE) in the former septic system and in the silt layer. B. Identify the general nature of the technology proposed: In situ chemical In situ biological In situ physical Other Explain: Sodium hydroxide-activated persulfate in targeted source areas, followed by biogeochemical agents such as ferrous or zero valent iron injection in areas where more dilute concentrations are present to promote reducing conditions in areas of residual impact. C. Identify the target environmental media: soil groundwater product D. Identify the performance objective: Reduce the overall concentrations of cVOCs migrating in groundwater to meet Residential Groundwater Volatilization Criteria and Surface Water Protection Criteria (e.g. PCE = 88 ug/l). 2. Primary Substance Discharged: (list chemical amounts in question 4, provide chemical details in Appendix F) A. Identify the primary substance(s): Water and sodium hydroxide-activated persulfate (ISCO). B. Categorize the nature of the principal substance to be discharged for the proposed activity. Electron Acceptor (typically for bioremediation of petroleum product) Chemical Oxidant: Peroxide Permanganate Persulfate Ozone Organic Electron Donor/Substrate (typically for biodegradation of chlorinated solvents) Reinjection of treated water (typically for an In situ physical process) Other/Composite: Explain: 3. Additional Discharge Information: (provide discussion as needed in part VI-D) A. Identify nature of additional chemicals that will be discharged (list chemicals in question 4) Supplemental buffering chemicals. Supplemental bio-nutrient substances. Cultured nonpathogenic naturally occurring biologic organisms. Surfactants Activators Other- Identify role: Biogeochemical reagent specifically designed to generate reactive iron sulfide minerals, ferrous iron sulfate, and/or zero valent iron and pH buffer (ISCR). B. Design/dosage based on Bench Testing Pilot Testing Other Explain: Input from various ISCO vendors has been provided including PeroxyChem, LLC and Regenesis. The vendor to be retained has not been decided. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 13 of 19 7/31/2012 C. Identify any residual that will remain in the subsurface after the discharge period: Radicals, salts, hydroxides. Sulfates will remain in solution for up to one year to facilitate natural bioattenuation processes. In-situ chemical reductants like ferrous iron will be employed for longer term reducing conditions (in-situ chemical reduction or ISCR). 4. Substances and Dosage List all substances to be discharged, identify the reason/role for their use, provide the proposed total discharge amounts, and identify the proposed concentrations if solutions are to be used. Include units of measurement. Provide, in Attachment F, MSDSs and detailed information about of each substance, including identification of proprietary chemical constituents and identification of appropriate monitoring parameters for the substance’s proposed use. Substance Role Total Amount Concentration Dihydrogen oxide (H20) Dispersion/solute 40,000 gals 80-86% Persulfate Oxidant ~40,000 lbs 16% Sodium hydroxide (25%) Activator ~80,000 lbs 25 wt% Ferrous iron sulfate Oxidant/electron donor ~40,000 lbs TBD 5. Delivery mechanism: Identify how the substances will be introduced into the subsurface A. Check all that apply: Emplacement in an open excavation resulting from removal of a tank or polluted soil. Emplacement of removable devices. Identify: Injection or emplacement on or below the ground surface: Single use Constructed Existing wells Other injection points multi-use points repurposed Describe: Primarily GeoProbe injection points of slurry at depths below the groundwater table to the depth of bedrock. Alternative delivery mechanism/source. Identify: B. Injection specifics (per discharge period or Discharge Event): Total discharge Volume (gal.): 30,000 Number of injection locations: 40 +/- Rate per point (range) (gpm): 3-5 gpm Expected pressure range (psi): 5-10 psi C. Depth range of discharge: Below Surface: 10-60 Below Water Table: 0-50 DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 14 of 19 7/31/2012 6. Other Considerations (provide discussion in part VI-D): A. Yes No Activity will result in introduction of chemicals into or on bedrock, or within 2 feet of the bedrock surface. B. Yes No Injection pressures are likely to alter aquifer hydrogeologic properties. C. Yes No Hydraulic controls are used to establish the Zone of Influence. D. Yes No A groundwater or soil vapor remedial system is in operation at the site or is proposed as an element of the remedial system. E. Yes No More than 50,000 gal/day of water/solution will be managed. F. Yes No Recurring scheduled discharge periods or multiple Discharge Events are proposed. Summarize any multiphase schedule: Phased application of ISCO and ISCR injections are likely to be required under this permit to meet remedial objectives. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 15 of 19 7/31/2012 Part VI-C: Detailed Information- Monitoring Proposed 1. Permit Compliance Monitoring: A. Identify receptors to be monitored: Water Supply Surface Water Storm and Sewer Indoor Air Wells (public/private) Receptors Systems Pathway Other Explain: B. How many wells/points will be used to monitor the limits of the zone of influence? 8 C. How many wells/points will monitor chemical conditions within the zone of influence? 6 D. Yes No Field observations and field parameter monitoring are proposed. E. Yes No Verification of injected chemical analysis/concentrations is proposed. 2. In the tables below, summarize the nature of the compliance monitoring program: Monitoring Well Location(s) Objective(s) Parameter Group(s)* Frequency* MW-104, MW-3R, MW-4R, PZ-2, RW- 303S, RW-303D. DAK-3S, and DAK-3D Within treatment area or downgradient and on-site. CVOCs, 1,4-dioxane, field parameters (water level, pH, conductance, temp, DO, ORP, sulfate) Prior to, 1 week after, then quarterly for 1 year DAK-1S, DAK-1D, DAK-2S, DAK-2D MW-205S and MW-205D Downgradient and off-site CVOCs, 1,4-dioxane, field parameters (water level, pH, conductance, temp, DO, ORP, sulfate) Prior to, 1 week after, then quarterly for 1 year Other Monitoring Sites(s) Objective(s) Parameter Group(s)* Frequency* Surface Water – Up Background for Oxoboxo pH, conductance, temp, DO, ORP, sulfate 3 times/day during injection Surface Water – Down Monitor Oxoboxo Brook surface water for indication of ISCO effects pH, conductance, temp, DO, ORP, sulfate 3 times/day during injection *Parameter Group Constituents Analyzed Objective(s) CVOCs and 1,4-Dioxane CVOCs & 1,4-Dioxane Monitor COCs and breakdown products Field parameters Water level, pH, conductance, temp, DO, ORP, sulfate Field monitoring to map chemical effects *Frequency During Active Discharge Post-Discharge 2 times/day minimum or as needed Quarterly for one year 3. Rebound: Identify how the occurrence of rebound will be evaluated: Post-ISCO monitoring will identify changes to the hydrogeochemistry and CVOC concentrations. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 16 of 19 7/31/2012 4. Other Monitoring Information: A. Summarize how monitoring frequency and duration take into account site groundwater flow conditions, discharge chemodynamics, receptor locations, and the activity timeline: Field monitoring of hydraulic conditions and effects in the groundwater and surface water will be monitored during injections. Persulfate's oxidant effectiveness lasts approximately 6 to 8 months. Quarterly monitoring is intended to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment, the amount of residual sulfate in the groundwater. The quarterly results will be used to determine if additional injection is needed or biogeochemical injections (ISCR) are recommended. B. Identify any changes in monitoring frequency (or parameters) associated with the shift from active injection to post injection monitoring, and the rationale for such modifications: Once determined that the injections are not significantly mounding groundwater and/or effecting the surface water, the hydrology will be allowed to equilibrate. C. Identify any indicator or surrogate parameters used and the rationale for their selection: Sulfate can be determinated in the field using a colorimetric test or titration. D. Summarize any monitoring that incorporates approaches other than field or laboratory measurement of water samples from wells: Drainage system on-site and Pink Row will be monitored to ensure that treated groundwater is not being intercepted. 5. Other Monitoring Considerations: A. A. Describe how the pre-discharge baseline condition for monitoring comparisons has been or will be established prior to initiation of the discharge: Prior data is available and will be compared to data collected one week prior to the discharge. The data set will be compared to identify anomalies. B. Summarize any operational or process monitoring of the discharge that will be conducted: The pressure and rate of pumping will be monitored and adjusted as necessary to prevent daylighting of oxidant. C. Identify any other periodic monitoring being conducted at the site that relates to the pollution being remediated or that may be affected by the discharge: Soil vapor extraction systems are being operated outside of the subject area. This system is being independently operated and maintained. D. Identify if any wells used for the discharge will later be used for compliance or verification monitoring, and how sample representativeness for the data objective will be evaluated: Injections will be through temporary GeoProbe points near and adjacent to monitoring wells which will be used for long-term compliance monitoring. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 17 of 19 7/31/2012 Part VI-D: Detailed Information- On-site Adverse Outcome Mitigation Describe how adverse outcomes associated with site conditions identified in Part VI-A and the specific proposed activities identified in Part VI-B will be prevented or minimized by the proposed activity design and implementation, how monitoring identified in Part VI-C will allow adverse outcomes to be identified, and the contingencies for mitigation of adverse outcomes should any occur. Also discuss any identified data gaps and how they are either not significant or will be addressed during implementation. Check here if continuation sheet is needed, and label and attach it to this sheet. Monitoring will prevent adverse effects. Data gaps will be addressed during the initial stages of implementation including installation of sentinel wells, evaluation of static groundwater conditions, elevation of utilities, and contaminant extent. DEEP-REM-GWP-APP-600 18 of 19 7/31/2012 Part VII-A: Supporting Documents Identify, by checking the box, each specific lettered attachment being submitted with this application form, and provide information regarding their content. When submitting any supporting documents, please label the documents as indicated in this part (e.g., Attachment A, etc.) and be sure to include the applicant's name as indicated on this application form. Attachment A: An 8 1/2” X 11” copy of the relevant portion or a full-sized original of a USGS Quadrangle Map indicating the exact location of the facility or site and required nearby features. Indicate the quadrangle name on the map. Attachment B: Site Conditions Report, including: found on page(s): Characterization of release being treated 6-8 Description of previous remedial actions 5-6 Identification of relevant site conditions and history 2-8 Characterization of hydrogeology and water chemistry 4-8 Identification of receptor or transport pathways 3-8 Attachment C: Site Plan(s), including: cross section(s) Basic site boundaries Location of significant site features Groundwater flow on maps & sections Depiction of release, plume, & other AOCs Location of wells and other data points Location(s) of proposed activity Specific proposed discharge location(s) Composite zone of influence Location(s) of receptors/pathways Monitoring locations Attachment D: Work Plan, including, but not limited to: found on page(s): Rational for technology selection / remedial goal 9-10 Identification of all substances to be discharged 12 Reason needed/evaluation of substances identified in VI-B 12-13 Evaluation of byproducts produced / interaction with aquifer 12-13 Bench/pilot study results, or reason unnecessary 12-13 Calculation of chemical dosage and distribution App 3 Description of discharge mechanisms 13 Chemical handling measures 12-14 Site safety measures 12-14 Contingency measures 13 Discussion of multiphase implementation approach 13-14 Attachment E: Monitoring Plan, including: found on page(s): Monitoring program objectives 11-14 Monitoring locations and frequencies, and rationale/objective 12 Monitoring constituents/parameters and rationale 11-14 Monitoring sampling and analytical methods 11-14 Data evaluation and reporting procedures 13-14 Attachment F: Specifications for substances to be discharged, as applicable. Attachment G: Coastal Consistency Review Form (DEP-APP-004), if applicable. Attachment H: Conservation/Preservation restriction information, if applicable. Attachment I: CT NDDB Information, if applicable, including CT NDDB Request Form (DEP-APP-007). Down To Earth, LLC 122 Church Street Naugatuck, Connecticut 06770 CHARACTERIZATION REPORT IN-SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION/REDUCTION - INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTION AREA OF CONCERN 6 - SOLVENT RELEASE AREA FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT Prepared for: Dakota Partners 1264 Main Street Waltham, MA 02451 Prepared By: Down To Earth, LLC 122 Church Street Naugatuck, CT 06770 February 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION & REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 3.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 3 3.1 TOPOGRAPHY 3 3.2 SURFICIAL AND BEDROCK GEOLOGY 3 3.3 HYDROGEOLOGY 4 3.4 WETLANDS 5 3.5 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS 5 3.6 RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION HISTORY 5 3.7 NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION 6 3.8 AOC-6 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS & REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES 7 3.9 AOC-7 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS (OFF-SITE PLUME) 8 4.0 PROPOSED INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTION 8 4.1 REMEDIAL OBJECTIVES 9 4.1.1 Remedial Objectives for Soils 9 4.1.2 Remedial Objectives for Groundwater 9 4.2 PERMITTING AND PUBLIC NOTICE 10 4.3 GROUND PENETRATING RADAR (GPR) SURVEY 10 4.4 GROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREAT SYSTEM 10 4.5 INSTALLATION OF SENTINEL MONITORING WELLS 11 4.6 BASELINE GROUNDWATER MONITORING 11 4.7 ISCO-IRA DETAILS 12 4.8 POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING 13 4.9 SCHEDULE 15 FIGURES APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 AECOM 2008 FIGURES SHOWING CONTAMINANTS IN SOIL SAMPLES APPENDIX 2 AEI SELECTED CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION 2012 to CURRENT APPENDIX 3 OXIDANT INFORMATION REDUCTANT INFORMATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION & REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES On behalf of Dakota Partners, Down To Earth, LLC (DTE) and Mabbett & Associates, Inc. (Mabbett) have prepared this In-situ Chemical Oxidation/Reduction Interim Remedial Action (ISCO-IRA) Characterization Report with the objective of mitigating potential risks associated with solvent-contaminated soils and groundwater in a release area identified at the Faria Beede Instruments/Thomas G. Faria Corp. property in Uncasville, Connecticut. The purpose of this plan is to describe the means and methods to inject sodium hydroxide-activated persulfate into the overburden aquifer to treat residual concentrations of tetrachloroethene (PCE) and related degradation by-products in-situ. A post-remediation groundwater monitoring plan is also proposed. A Locus Plan and a Site Plan are provided as Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The Subject Area for the proposed ISCO-IRA has been identified as Area of Concern 6 (AOC-6). This AOC has been labelled the “southern parking lot” where various known and suspected sources of chlorinated solvent releases have been studied since the 1980s. Details of the proposed ISCO-IRA are shown on Figures 3, 4A, and 4B. A geological cross-section through the proposed treatment area is provided on Figure 5. Implementation of the proposed ISCO-IRA includes the following activities: 1. Public notice of the proposed interim remedial action in accordance with CGS 22a-6g. 2. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey in the injection area to identify subsurface structures and anomalies that might impact the implementation of the ISCO-IRA. 3. A pump-and-treat system currently operates in eastern portion of the proposed injection area. The pump-and-treat system will need to be temporarily shut down during implementation of the ISCO-IRA for the following reasons: a. The pumping increases groundwater velocities in the contaminated zone due to the induced higher vertical gradients. The increased groundwater velocities reduce the residence time for the oxidant to react with contaminated soils and groundwater. Allowing increased time for the reductive dechlorination process increases the chance the oxidation will be successful. b. After pretreatment, the pump-and-treat system discharges to Oxoboxo Brook, in accordance with a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permit. The pretreatment system cannot adjust pH or remove persulfate from the water stream and direct discharge of oxidant-enriched water to the Oxoboxo Brook must be avoided. 4. New monitoring well installation. Three monitoring well pairs will be installed into the shallow and deep overburden aquifers at the downgradient zone of influence of the proposed ISCO treatment areas. The wells pairs will be installed to monitor changes in groundwater conditions, to allow early identification of adverse conditions (increased vapor intrusion potential etc.), and to monitor the effects of the ISCO injections on groundwater parameters. Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 2 5. Baseline groundwater sampling. A baseline groundwater sampling event consisting of the collection of samples from 8 existing monitoring wells and 6 monitoring wells that will be installed during the IRA. Each groundwater sample will be submitted for laboratory analysis of chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs). 6. Injection of sodium hydroxide-activated persulfate using a GeoProbe system in five areas totaling approximately 4,400 square foot area using approximately 40 injection points advanced to 60 feet below grade (to the top of bedrock). Injections will focus on hotspot areas identified from a 2012 Membrane Interface Probe (MIP) survey. Approximately 10 months after the chemical oxidant injections, an in-situ chemical reductant is proposed to be injected using similar methodologies. In-situ chemical reduction (ISCR) is slower acting and sustains reducing conditions in the aquifer to promote the bioattenuation of CVOCs. 5. Monitoring of groundwater parameters during and after the injections to evaluate the aerial extent of hydrogeologic changes, geochemical changes, to prevent impacts to sensitive receptors (Oxoboxo Brook and residential houses) and to document the permanence of anticipated reductions of CVOCs in groundwater. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject Site is an approximately 10.6-acre industrial property located in Uncasville, Connecticut. The property is occupied by eleven mill buildings, many of which are interconnected and several of which span Oxoboxo Brook, a water body that runs from west to east through the mill complex. The Site coordinates are 41° 26’ 11.45” north latitude and -72° 6’ 26.67” west longitude. The Site is in a mixed industrial, commercial, and residential area. An Area Plan is provided as Figure 1 and a Site Plan as Figure 2. The property includes approximately 100,000 square-feet of manufacturing, warehouse, and distribution space. The facility was initially constructed as a woolen mill in the 19th century with construction of buildings over time prior to Faria’s purchase of the property in 1964. Since 1964, the buildings have been used for the manufacture of analog and digital engine monitoring instruments used in a variety of marine, military, construction, and related equipment. The property has ten mostly interconnected buildings which are designated: M-4/4A, M-5, M-6, M-7, M-8, M-10/10A, M-11, M-12, M-13 and M-14 on Figure 2. Most of the buildings are one- to two-story brick structures. Several of the buildings have basements. Building M-4/4A has a total of six stories with two basement levels. Four of the buildings form a central courtyard. Faria conducts a wide range of manufacturing operations on-site including: printed circuit board design and manufacturing, plastic injection and blow molding, metal machining (turning, milling, grinding and punch press), painting, polishing, electrical assembly, warehousing, and shipping. The buildings have a combined total of approximately 100,000 square feet of floor space. The portions of the property that are not occupied by buildings consist of paved and unpaved employee parking areas, loading and unloading areas, and an area of recently imported fill. The approximately one-half acre area of imported fill forms a plateau approximately 8 feet above the Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 3 surrounding grade in the southeast corner of the Site. The importation of the approximately 7,000 cubic yards of soil to the Site was approved by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP). Faria Beede maintains a groundwater pump-and-treat system which recovers groundwater from six extraction wells located within AOC-6, east of Building M-13. The collected groundwater is pretreated for elevated CVOCs through a tray aerator and carbon system prior to discharge to Oxoboxo Brook. The extracted water is also used for non-contact cooling water in molding machines prior to discharge under a NPDES permit issued by the CTDEEP. Properties adjoining the subject Site are zoned for residential and commercial use. Figure 2 shows the current land use of the surrounding properties. Field observations by DTE confirmed that the surrounding land use consists of residential and commercial properties including: Residential properties to the north Pink Row and residential properties to the east Depot Road, commercial properties including Pennell’s Auto, and private residences to the south Route 32 and Oxoboxo Dam to the west 3.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Information related to the environmental setting of the Site and vicinity was obtained from the Connecticut Environmental Conditions On-line website which is maintained by the University of Connecticut: http://ctecoapp1.uconn.edu/advancedviewer/). Figures 6 and 7 were developed using portions of the information obtained, as summarized below. 3.1 TOPOGRAPHY The Site and regional topography is shown on Figure 1. The Site is in a valley formed by Oxoboxo Brook, which roughly bisects the Site and flows from west to east. The total topographic relief ranges from Elv 74 in the southwest portion of the Site to Elv 16 in the east-central portion of the Site. 3.2 SURFICIAL AND BEDROCK GEOLOGY As mapped on Figure 6, surficial soils in the vicinity of the Site are comprised of glacial sand, silt, and gravel. Surficial geology consists of outwash and alluvium deposited by Oxoboxo Brook and to some degree by the Thames River. Construction of buildings, septic systems, and utilities are presumed to have disrupted natural deposition in the Subject Area. Deeper glacial deposits (glacial till) form a thin veneer over bedrock, particularly north of Oxoboxo Brook. Overburden deposits thicken to the east, with an increase to the depth of bedrock toward the Thames River. Toward the Thames River, the depth to bedrock reaches 125 feet below ground surface (bgs) or more. Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 4 Based on information collected during historical drilling efforts, the Site is underlain by two types of bedrock, a muscovite, biotite schist and a pink granite. The Bedrock Geological Map of Connecticut (Rogers, 1985) identifies the Potter Hill Granite Gneiss; the Hope Valley Alaskite Gneiss; and the Plainfield Formation quartzite in the vicinity of the Site. 3.3 HYDROGEOLOGY The Site is located in a GB groundwater area based on the Connecticut Environmental Conditions on-line mapping (see Figure 7). GB groundwater is defined as being located within a historically highly-urbanized area or an area of intense industrial activity and where public water supply service is available. Such groundwater may not be suitable for human consumption without treatment due to waste discharges, spills, or leaks of chemicals or land use impacts. Oxoboxo Brook is identified as a Class B surface water. Class B surface waters are designated for: habitat for fish and other aquatic life and wildlife; recreation; navigation; and industrial and agricultural water supply. Picker Pond is located immediately west of the Site across Route 32, formed by a dam on Oxoboxo Brook upstream from the Site. The dam historically supplied hydroelectric power to the textile mill operations on the Site from the mid-1800s. Remnants of various head races and tail races remain on-Site. Currently, the Oxoboxo Brook channel passes through the central portion of the Site, is culverted below Pink Row on the eastern Site boundary, and drains into Gairs Pond located approximately 500 feet to the east of the Site. Gair’s Pond discharges to the Thames River, located 2,300 feet to the east of the Site. The eastern portion of Gairs Pond is mapped by the CTDEEP to be tidally influenced. A geologic profile depicting subsurface conditions within the proposed treatment zone is provided as Figure 6. Based on the findings from a significant amount of environmental investigation of the Site, the depth to groundwater varies between 6 and 12 feet below the ground surface. In general, there is an overburden aquifer unit comprised of stratified but poorly-sorted materials such as outwash, stratified-drift, and glacial deposits. In the eastern portion of the Site, south of Oxoboxo Brook, a discontinuous silt layer splits the aquifer into an upper and lower unit. A sand and gravel outwash deposit is located below the silt layer, where the silt layer has been encountered. Detections of chlorinated solvents have been identified in each of these formations. Data does suggest that the silt layer can act as an aquitard and inhibit the downward vertical migration of CVOCs to some extent. Higher concentrations of CVOCs may be found in the upper silt layer. However, the silt layer does not appear to be continuous, nor is it believed to extend north of Oxoboxo Brook. High concentrations of CVOCs are also found in groundwater in the deep aquifer. AECOM’s 2009 Revised RCRA Corrective Measures Study (CMS) report included the results of a pump test on the shallow aquifer. AECOM determined the hydraulic conductivity of the combined sand and silty sand aquifer above the silt unit to be approximately 4x10-3 centimeters per second (cm/sec). The hydraulic conductivity of the deep overburden was estimated to be similar in magnitude at 8 x 10-3 cm/sec. The hydraulic conductivity of the silt aquitard was estimated to be 3.6 x 10-7 cm/sec. In 2013, AEI used a Hydraulic Profiling Tool (HPT) to estimate hydraulic conductivities during a Membrane Interface probe study. Using this method, the Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 5 hydraulic conductivity of the sand and gravel was estimated to be 4.9 x 10-2 cm/sec and the silt unit to be 1.7 x 10-3 cm/sec. The source of the variability in the estimated hydraulic conductivities published by both AECOM and AEI is likely due to the different methods used. AECOM’s data was based on pump testing and likely represents the various saturated zones, whereas AEI’s data were based on individual data points measured using HPT at individual boring depths. Taken together, these measurements provide a reasonable estimate of the hydraulic conductivity throughout the treatment area and provide some perspective with regard to the variability in the formation. Groundwater flow in the shallow overburden is towards Oxoboxo Brook from the north of the Brook and on the western portion of the Faria-Beede property, and towards the extraction wells (influenced by pumping) in the eastern portion of the Faria property. Shallow groundwater is affected by the stream and low-lying wetlands associated with Gairs Pond, where the flow regime is expected to be largely controlled by the presence of Oxoboxo Brook and Gairs Pond. Groundwater flow in the deeper overburden has been shown to be generally towards the extraction wells in the southern portion of the Site, which are screened from the bottom of the silt unit to the top of bedrock. The capture zone of the groundwater extraction system has been shown to extend from near Oxoboxo Brook south beyond the MW-4 cluster and appears to extend across Pink Row. The overburden aquifer north of Oxoboxo Brook is much shallower than south of the brook and therefore is not bisected by the silt unit. As a result, the expected influence of pumping north of Oxoboxo Brook is expected to be minimal. Groundwater potentiometric surface data from the monitoring well clusters at MW-3, MW-4, MW- 9, MW-10, MW-202, MW-204, and MW-205 indicates an overall trend of downward hydraulic gradients, with groundwater tending to flow from the shallow overburden aquifer to the deeper aquifer. 3.4 WETLANDS Wetlands associated with Oxoboxo Brook have been identified in the southwestern portion of the Site and along the stream channel itself. 3.5 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS As shown on Figure 7, the Site is in a Natural Diversity Database (NDDB) area. The NDDB area is indicated along the Oxoboxo Brook drainage channel through the Site. The mapping identifies that threatened or endangered species have been identified in the area but does not identify the specific species. 3.6 RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION HISTORY The initial environmental investigation work at the Site was completed in the early 1980s when the CTDEEP and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted site inspections of Thomas G. Faria Corporation. Subsequent EPA groundwater monitoring detected chlorinated solvents in the groundwater and associated the release with Faria. Faria implemented a groundwater extraction and treatment system in 1985 to prevent off-site migration of impacted groundwater. Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 6 In 1994, TRC Environmental Consultants completed a RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA) for the Site and in 1996 A.T. Kearney prepared an Environmental Indicator (EI) Report to identify ecological impacts. In September 1999, Woodard & Curran prepared a scope of work (i.e., RFI Work Plan) that was approved by EPA and implemented. On May 17, 1999, The Thomas G. Faria Corporation was issued an Order by the EPA under Section 3013 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA’s Order required the facility to undertake corrective measures to mitigate soil and groundwater contamination. A Consent Agreement was also issued by the CTDEEP to require compliance with state statutes. Many of the required remedial measures developed under the 1999 Order have been completed at the Site including expansion of an existing groundwater pump-and-treat system, soil excavation, and installation of a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system. Since approximately 2013, the facility’s corrective actions have been implemented and overseen by Advanced Environmental Interface (AEI) of Middlefield, Connecticut. In 2016, Faria-Beede negotiated a transfer of the Site to Pit Stop Holdings, LLC. Pit Stop Holdings is currently in the process of negotiating a purchase and sale agreement for the real estate to Dakota Partners (Dakota) of Waltham, Massachusetts. Dakota intends to redevelop the site for residential purposes and has financing approval from the Connecticut Housing Finance Administration. 3.7 NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION Detailed descriptions of the Site and its history have been provided in previous reports, which are available electronically upon request. The following section summarizes some of the prior investigation and remediation activities performed at the Site. Figures from AECOM’s Supplemental RFI Status Report Soil Addendum (2008) report are attached in Appendix 1. Figures and tables generated by AEI which summarize some of the most recent data are included in Appendix 2. Groundwater at the Site contains a plume of dissolved chlorinated solvents (i.e., PCE, trichloroethene [TCE], 1,1,1-trichloroethane [TCA]) and their related biological degradation products (i.e., cis-1,2-dichloroethylene [cis-1,2-DCE]; 1,1-DCE; 1,1-dichloroethane; and vinyl chloride). Groundwater sampling results indicate the presence of CVOCs over much of the eastern portion of the facility property. Concentrations of CVOCs are generally highest in the immediate vicinity of the former leaching field and in the deeper overburden aquifer. From this area of high concentration, a plume of CVOCs extends to the east beyond residential homes toward a former industrial area, eventually reducing below detection limits before reaching the Thames River. CVOCs have been detected in groundwater samples to the east as far as Smurfit Stone overburden wells and as far south as Dock Road. CVOCs have been detected in both the overburden and bedrock in downgradient wells. According to Faria-Beede’s consultants, contaminant levels in the bedrock groundwater are a result of a downward vertical hydraulic gradient forcing dissolved contamination into the bedrock, and not indicative of the presence of DNAPL. Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 7 High concentrations of PCE in groundwater on-site (16 ppm in RW-303 in August 2017) and off- site at 31 Pink Row (15 ppm in well MW-205D in June 2017) remain. Several factors, including installation of a groundwater extraction and treatment system (pump-and-treat system), have served to mitigate the extent of the groundwater plume and inhibit the migration of contaminants. In the early 1980s, several high-volume production wells located offsite to the east and operated by Connecticut Light and Power (CL&P) provided a significant driver for contaminant migration to the east. These wells have since been abandoned. Further, a significant source of groundwater contamination (i.e., impacted soil in the drum storage area) was removed and discharges to the onsite septic system were ceased. Each of these measures has served to reduce the potential for migration of contaminants from the original release location. As summarized below in Section 3.8, there are residual high levels of contaminants that remain in soils within the deep overburden aquifer. The impacts extend beyond the limits of the characterization area and have not been fully delineated to the south and east of Area 6. Soils in these areas contained high concentrations of CVOCs, which are likely providing a continuing source of contamination to groundwater. Soil vapor sampling has been conducted at both on-site and off-site locations to delineate the extent of potential vapor intrusion impacts resulting from the groundwater plume. Soil vapor samples collected in 2017 and 2018 identified the highest concentrations of CVOCs in soil vapor samples collected from within the SVE area (Area 4, within the footprint of Building M-10A), lower concentrations within the paved portion of Area 6, and still lower concentrations moving off-site to the east. The results of this sampling effort identified detectable levels of CVOCs in soil vapor samples collected as far downgradient (east) as Depot Road, which runs north-south adjacent to the banks of the Thames River. However, none of the soil vapor samples collected during this sampling event (even those collected from the SVE area) exceeded the Residential Volatilization Criteria for soil vapor. 3.8 AOC-6 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS & REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES The primary source of the impacts is believed to be the former septic system located near the southeast corner of Building M-13 (see Figure 2). Discharges to the septic system were reportedly discontinued in 1982. The tank was decommissioned by pumping out its contents and filling the tank with soil. In 1985, groundwater extraction activities in the southern parking lot area (AOC-6) commenced with pumping from monitoring wells MW-3D, MW-4D, and MW-5. Initially, treatment included spraying the recovered water in an aeration pond located west of the MW-3 well cluster. In 2000, groundwater recovery well RW-101 was installed and the treatment method switched to include air stripping and vapor-phase carbon. The vast majority of groundwater cleanup criteria exceedances are related to impacts in the southern parking lot area (AOC-6) from the historical release of wastewater through the former septic system. The CVOC plume is understood to be primarily related to residual PCE adhered to the silt and silty sand zone immediately above it, which varies in depth between approximately 17- to 21-feet below grade. Impacts are also apparent in the vicinity of Building M-13 and the walkway between Building M-13 and M-10, in the area of MW-104. However, the source of these impacts has not been identified and concentrations are much lower overall. Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 8 In November 2013, AEI oversaw field testing of CVOC distribution at AOC-6 using a MIP, HPT, and Electrical Conductivity (EC) probe. The results were summarized in AEI’s Remedial Action Plan (Revised March 2018). The MIP results provided semi-quantitative estimate of contaminant levels. The color mapping is included on Figure 3. According to AEI, elevated readings correspond to the approximate depth of the observed silt layer. HPT was used to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of the geologic materials in AOC-6. As reported above, the results ranged between less than 5 ft/day (1.7 x 10-3 cm/sec) in the silt and clay unit to over 140 ft/day (4.9 x 10-2 cm/sec) in the sand and gravel aquifers. AEI concluded that, “It has been shown that there are residual high levels of contaminants that remain dispersed in the deeper aquifer. These impacts will remain in the aquifer, especially when they are associated with the marine clays and silts observed in the area.” 3.9 AOC-7 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS (OFF-SITE PLUME) Residential water wells on Pink Row, to the east of AOC-6, were first determined to be impacted by the release of CVOCs in the early 1980s. In 1983, Faria provided public water service to the Town of Montville, including the area downgradient of the Site, installing connections to 16 properties and making water available to the rest of the properties in the area. Over the years, Faria has helped connect Uncasville residents to public water and has worked with CTDEEP and the Uncas Health District to identify and address private water supply well issues. Faria completed an updated residential well survey in March 2009. The home serviced by the last private well in the area-of-impact was connected to the municipal water supply in 2016. In August 2003, following the completion of a soil vapor and indoor air quality investigation, Faria installed sub-slab depressurization (SSD) systems at the dwellings located at 19, 23, 27, and 31 Pink Row, as shown on Figure 2. According to AECOM’s Corrective Measures Study, exceedances of drinking water criteria were detected approximately 2,000 feet east of the Site and in both overburden and bedrock aquifers. Bedrock impacts above the drinking water standards extended from Pink Row to Depot Road to the eastern part of Dock Road, located approximately 2,000 feet to the east of the Site. AECOM estimated that the areal extent of CVOC concentrations in bedrock above the drinking water standards was approximately 44 acres. We note that all downgradient properties are now connected to municipal water supply and groundwater in this area has been re-classified as GB since 2017. All private and public water withdrawals are presumed to have stopped. 4.0 PROPOSED INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTION The following remedial actions are proposed with the objective of reducing the overall concentrations of CVOCs at Area 6. Sodium hydroxide-activated persulfate will be applied between approximately 10 to 60 feet below the ground surface (or to the depth of bedrock) using a GeoProbe or direct-push injection system through approximately 40 points encompassing an area of approximately 4,400 square feet, as shown on Figures 4A and 4B. Biogeochemical reagent products will also be injected during the Interim IRA to promote reducing conditions after the persulfate has been depleted. The manufacturer’s information on both products planned for Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 9 used during the Interim IRA is included in Appendix 3. Injections will focus on hotspot areas identified from the 2012 Membrane Interface Probe survey. A “General Permit Registration for In Situ Remediation: Chemical Oxidation” for this ISCO-IRA is being submitted under separate cover. The ISCO-IRA will be completed in accordance with the approved general permit’s terms and conditions. 4.1 REMEDIAL OBJECTIVES Remedial objectives of the ISCO-IRA are summarized below. 4.1.1 Remedial Objectives for Soils For soil, the remedial objectives of the ISCO-IRA are to: a. Reduce concentrations of CVOCs in soil within AOC-6, with a specific focus on the former location of a septic tank and presumed leaching field where elevated concentrations of CVOCs were identified by AEI and others. The septic tank has been inferred to be a primary source of the contamination and has been abandoned in place. b. Reduce concentrations of CVOCs in soil within and downgradient from the presumed release location, which have sorbed to a discontinuous fine-grained silt layer and aquitard located approximately 17 to 21 feet below grade. c. Reduce concentrations of CVOCs in saturated soils within the overburden to below the GB Groundwater Pollutant Mobility Criteria (GB-PMC). The GB-PMC applies to soil located above the seasonal high groundwater table. The impacts from ISCO will be limited to soil at the phreatic surface (soil/groundwater interface). 4.1.2 Remedial Objectives for Groundwater For groundwater, the remedial objectives of the ISCO-IRA are to: a. Provide groundwater conditions which are conducive to the long-term biodegradation/bioattenuation of organic compounds in the saturated zone by the generation of dissolved sulfates which promote reductive dechlorination. Long-term accelerated bioattenuation will include injection of biogeochemical reagents specifically designed to generate reactive iron sulfide minerals, ferrous iron sulfate and/or zero valent iron and pH buffer. Facilitating a reduction zone in groundwater (In- situ chemical reduction or ISCR) is intended to provide longer lasting accelerated biological degradation of CVOCs. b. Reduce concentrations of CVOCs in groundwater to below the Residential Groundwater Volatilization Criteria (R-GWVC). The R-GWVC for tetrachloroethene or PCE is 1,500 µg/l. Lowering the mass concentrations of CVOCs in groundwater is anticipated to also beneficially lower the concentrations of CVOCs in soil vapor, mitigating potential exposure to CVOCs in the indoor air of residential buildings. c. Reduce CVOC concentrations to below the Surface Water Protection Criteria (SWPC). The SPWC for PCE is 88 µg/l. Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 10 In accordance with the CTDEEP registration, groundwater conditions will be evaluated before and after implementation of the ISCO-IRA. Groundwater parameters will be monitored during and after the injections to evaluate the aerial extent of hydrogeologic impacts, geochemical changes, to prevent impacts to sensitive receptors (Oxoboxo Brook and residential houses), and to document the anticipated reductions of CVOCs in groundwater. 4.2 PERMITTING AND PUBLIC NOTICE Prior to the commencement of the ISCO-IRA, the applicant will provide notice of the remedial action by at least two of the following means, consistent with CTDEEP requirements: a. Publish a notice of remedial action in The Day, a daily newspaper published in New London, Connecticut. b. Erect, and maintain for at least thirty (30) days, a legible sign not less than 6 feet by 4 feet which is clearly visible from a public roadway and must include the words "ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP IN PROGRESS AT THIS SITE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ”Insert name" and include a telephone number for an office from which any interested person may obtain additional information about the remedial action. c. Mail a notice of the remedial action to each owner-of-record of properties which abut the Site using the address list on the last completed grand list of Uncasville. 4.3 GROUND PENETRATING RADAR (GPR) SURVEY The presumed locations of underground utilities are shown on Figure 4. These locations are based on survey information published by Aeschliman Land Surveying of East Hartford, Connecticut. A GPR survey will be conducted in the proposed treatment area to ensure that the locations of underground utilities and other underground structures are known. The location of injection points may be modified based on the findings of the GPR survey. Call Before You Dig will also be notified, as required by state law, and reported underground utilities will be compared against the results of the GPR survey to ensure completeness. 4.4 GROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREAT SYSTEM The pump-and-treat system currently operates within the proposed injection area and will need to be temporarily shut down for the following reasons: a. The extraction of groundwater increases groundwater velocities due to the induced increased vertical gradients. The increased groundwater velocities reduce the residence time of oxidants within the treatment zone, thereby limiting the duration of the chemical reactions necessary to break down the CVOCs, which are sorbed to soils and dissolved in groundwater. Allowing increased contact time for the reductive dechlorination process to occur increases the chance the ISCO-IRA will be successful. Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 11 b. Collected groundwater from the pump-and-treat system is currently discharged to Oxoboxo Brook in accordance with a NPDES discharge permit. The pretreatment system does not treat for persulfate nor adjust the pH of the treatment system effluent. Groundwater with elevated persulfate levels and pH cannot be discharged directly to Oxoboxo Brook under the NPDES permit, therefore discharges from the existing pump- and-treat system must be discontinued until after the impacts from oxidants have attenuated. The pump-and-treat system will only be shut down with the explicit approval of the CTDEEP and EPA. Monitoring will be conducted just before, during, and after the oxidant injections to ensure that baseline conditions have been restored before operation of the pump-and-treat system is resumed. The adverse impacts from the temporary shutdown of the pump-and-treat system are expected to be minimal in comparison to the benefits realized from the IRA. 4.5 INSTALLATION OF SENTINEL MONITORING WELLS Three deep/shallow well pairs (designated DAK-1 S/D through DAK-3 S/D) will be installed along the downgradient zone of influence of the proposed ISCO treatment areas at the approximate locations shown on Figure 4. The wells pairs will be installed in the shallow and deep aquifer at each location in order to monitor changes in groundwater conditions, to allow early identification of adverse conditions (increased vapor intrusion potential etc.), and to monitor the effects of the ISCO injections on groundwater parameters. 4.6 BASELINE GROUNDWATER MONITORING A baseline groundwater monitoring program will be implemented to establish aquifer conditions and CVOC concentrations in key monitoring wells before initiation of the IRA. The baseline program will be used to evaluate the extent of contaminant reduction in groundwater from the IRA, evaluate potential impacts to sensitive receptors, and to determine the appropriate time frame for resumption of the existing groundwater pump-and-treat system. Groundwater samples collected during the baseline monitoring program will be analyzed for the presence of CVOCs and screened in the field to measure pH, specific conductance, temperature, and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP). The following is a summary of the baseline monitoring program: a. The depth to groundwater will be measured in accessible groundwater monitoring wells located in the subject area. The total depth to the bottom of the wells will also be measured. Using the surveyed elevation of each monitoring well, the elevation of the groundwater surface will be calculated for each well. Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 12 b. Low-flow groundwater purging and sampling will be performed on the 14 groundwater monitoring wells included in the table below. A groundwater sample collected from each well will be analyzed for CVOCs by EPA Method 8260B and 1,4-dioxane by EPA Method 8270. c. The groundwater monitoring network is proposed to consist of the following 14 monitoring wells, eight of which are existing and six of which will be installed during the IRA. The network may be modified depending upon well accessibility and function, as determined in the field. Well Length of Screen Well Type (Overburden or Bedrock) Location Relative to Release Area MW-104 40-50 fbg Deep Overburden Upgradient MW-3R 46-58 fbg Deep Overburden Downgradient MW-4R 66-75 fbg Bedrock Within PZ-2 5-20 fbg Overburden Within MW-205S 8-18 fbg Overburden Downgradient - off-site MW-205D 35-45 fbg Deep Overburden Downgradient - off-site RW-303 S/D 33-48 fbg Deep Overburden Within DAK-1 S/D Proposed Overburden/Deep Overburden Downgradient - off-site DAK-2 S/D Proposed Overburden /Deep Overburden Downgradient - off-site DAK-3 S/D Proposed Overburden /Deep Overburden Downgradient - off-site 4.7 ISCO-IRA DETAILS Sodium hydroxide-activated sodium persulfate will be used to generate the combination of oxidative subsurface conditions that will reduce the highest concentrations of CVOCs which are sorbed to subsurface soils. Technical specifications for Peroxychem’s Klozur SP product, which is one example from a supplier of the ISCO chemical being proposed, are included in Appendix 3. Activated persulfate produces oxidative (SO4-, OH) and reductive (O2-) radicals creating aquifer conditions that are conducive to the destruction of organic compounds. Sodium persulfate can transfer electrons directly (direct oxidation). However, the primary mechanism of oxidation will be achieved by activating the formation of radicals (Petri et al., 2011). Approximately 10 months after the initial ISCO injections, the addition of in-situ chemical reduction agents (ISCR) are proposed such as reactive iron sulfide minerals, ferrous iron sulfate and/or zero valent iron and pH buffer. Facilitating a reduction zone in groundwater (In-situ chemical reduction or ISCR) is intended to provide longer lasting accelerated biological degradation of CVOCs. The following is a summary of the oxidant injection strategy that will be used during the Interim IRA: a. The ISCO injections will be implemented using a GeoProbe direct push system. Approximately 40 injection points will be used to treat the specific hot spot zones shown on Figure 4B. Alkaline-activated persulfate will be injected in five specific hot spots areas totaling approximately 4,400 square feet. The injection areas are intended to cover locations of known CVOC hotspots (the location of the former septic system and Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 13 downgradient impacted areas identified by the MIP study). The vertical extent of the treatment zone includes from approximately 10 feet below grade to the approximate depth of bedrock (approximately 60 feet below grade). The vertical zones of treatment will target depths identified by the Electron Capture Detector (ECD) provided in the MIPs data. b. The injection work will be conducted under the oversight of state-licensed well driller and personnel with appropriate OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) training. Injection chemicals will be transported on a hazardous materials Bill of Lading by DOT-licensed hazardous materials drivers on DOT-licensed trucks with appropriate spill containment equipment, as required by federal law. An eye wash station and decontamination shower will also be made available and ready for use. c. The oxidants (stored in bags) will be mixed with water and liquid sodium hydroxide (NaOH, stored in drums) in 330-gallon portable mixing tanks. The mixtures will conform to manufacturer’s recommended concentrations. The tanks will be plumbed to two injection pump skid rigs with chemically resistant-rated hoses and appropriate pressure ratings. Solution containing the activated persulfate will be prepared in the mixing tanks and batched as need on-site. d. The activated persulfate solution will be pumped into up to two GeoProbe-driven injection points at a time, at a flow rate of about 2 to 5 gpm. A total of approximately 40 locations will be injected. If daylighting of the oxidant solution occurs, the pump pressure and flow rates will be reduced. e. At least two times per day during oxidant injections, existing monitoring wells, groundwater recovery wells, and Oxoboxo Brook will be evaluated for changes in hydraulic head and field measurements for ORP, pH, specific conductance, and temperature (field parameters). A peristaltic pump will withdraw groundwater and the measurements will be obtained using a multi-parameter sonde affixed with a flow-through cell. Concurrent with these groundwater checks, storm drain pipes and discharges will be checked for flowing water unrelated to a storm event and the field parameters. If field parameter readings and/or observations identify potential impacts from oxidant-rich water to storm drains or Oxoboxo Brook, the discharges will be immediately discontinued. If oxidant- rich discharges are observed or identified, the CTDEEP Spill Notification number (860-424-3338) will be contacted immediately after the injections have been stopped and a state spill contractor will be called to respond. 4.8 POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING Natural attenuation monitoring is proposed to document the anticipated changes in aquifer conditions caused by the ISCO injection and to evaluate the permanence of CVOC concentration reductions as the persulfate oxidant is consumed. Post-remediation monitoring will also be used to determine whether the plume has reached steady state and operation of the pump-and-treat system may be resumed, and to evaluate the extent to which the IRA reduced the concentration Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 14 of CVOCs in groundwater. Post-remedial groundwater monitoring will consist of the following tasks: a. The depth to groundwater, and the associated groundwater elevations, will be measured in accessible groundwater monitoring wells prior to each sampling event. Groundwater contour plans will be completed for each sampling event to infer the direction of groundwater flow and calculate the hydraulic gradient. b. Low-flow groundwater purging and sampling will be performed on fourteen proposed groundwater monitoring wells (MW-104, MW-3R, MW-4R, PZ-2, MW-205S, MW-205D, RW-303S, RW-303D, DAK-1S, DAK-1D, DAK-2S, DAK-2D, DAK-3S, and DAK-3D). Each groundwater sample will be analyzed for the presence of CVOCs by EPA Method 8260B. If baseline groundwater sampling indicates the presence of 1,4-dioxane above applicable RSR standards, then post-remediation groundwater samples will also be analyzed for the presence of 1,4-dioxane. The groundwater monitoring network is shown on Figures 4A and 4B. c. The fourteen wells will be sampled and analyzed for CVOCs quarterly for a period of least one year in order to develop a data set to demonstrate the achievement of remediation goals considering seasonal variations in groundwater elevations. If an area of persistent CVOCs above remediation goals is identified, or the concentrations of CVOCs rebound above RSR standards, reinjection of persulfate will be targeted to treat the area of exceedance. Natural attenuation parameters of pH, conductance, temperature, ORP, DO, and sulfate will also be monitored quarterly using a calibrated sonde with flow-through cell. d. Concurrent with the sampling described above, an assessment will be made whether the addition of another round of persulfate injections is required or whether the introduction of reducing agents may be beneficial to enhance biological degradation of the residual CVOCs. Within approximately 9 months after the last persulfate injection, ISCR reagents may be injected in the treatment area. The ISCR reagents are intended to generate longer lasting subsurface conditions that are favorable for reductive dechlorination. e. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) sampling will be conducted in accordance with a site-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), which will be submitted under separate cover. Elements of the QA/QC procedures will include the use of trip blanks to be submitted with groundwater samples to evaluate the transfer of volatile contaminants into sample media during handling and shipping of field samples, the collection of blind duplicate samples for VOC analysis to evaluate sample collection and analytical precision, and the analysis of matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate samples to evaluate analytical bias. f. The results of the first year of post-remediation groundwater monitoring will be summarized in an Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report. The annual report will interpret the results of monitoring and provide an opinion regarding the progress achieved toward remedial objectives, additional remedial actions to be taken, or potential modifications to the monitoring network. Characterization Report Interim Remedial Action - ISCO Faria Beede Instruments 42 Pink Row, Uncasville, CT February 19, 2019 - Page No. 15 4.9 SCHEDULE The proposed schedule for implementing the ISCO-IRA assumes regulatory approval of this RAP and the ISCO General Permit during the first quarter of 2019: Activity Time Frame Public Notice March 2019 Pre-Injection Groundwater Sampling Week of April 6, 2019 Implementation of ISCO-IRA April 15-30, 2019 Restore Pump & Treat System June 2019 Post-Injection Groundwater Sampling (Quarterly for one year) May, August, December 2019, and March 2020 Implementation of ISCR injections November 2019 Annual Report May 2020 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT NO.QUADRANGLE LOCATION LOCUS PLAN Thomas G. Faria Corporation 385 Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382 91730.00 DATE: September 2016 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 INCH = 2,000 FEET Uncasville, CT September 2016 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP HELTCO6567PRI-M215BRIDGEOHW CPCO6564CL&P6255CL&P6256POLE12793POLE2746SNET2952SIGNLP TANKSLPCL&P2744SIGNPRI-M216SIGN UTUTUT CL&P2745SIGNA/CGUTGGAREA463,658 S.F.10.6441 AC.UTUTUTUTM H ' SOHW TRANSPADUTSIGNFLAGPOLESGUTOHW UT RW - 1 0 1 GROUNDWATER RECOVERYSYSTEM (RW-101)HELTCO6566HELTCO6565GG16" GGG GG16"16"16" G . M . O H WPOLEPOLEHELTCO6568HELTCO6570A/CTRANSPRI-M217SUPPORTPOLES UTA/CLPLPUT UT UTUTSoil VaporExtraction SystemTrailerSITE PLANFARIA INDUSTRIES42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:VTITFC91730.00jAMUARY 2019FIGURE 20100'200'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETNOTES:1. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASEMAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES3. ECD IMAGE FROM HIGH RESOLUTION SITECHARACTERIZATION RESULTS PUBLISHED BY AEI, 2014.LEGENDAPPROXIMATE MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONMW-1MW-200MW-202RMW-202PZMW-205SMW-205DMW-201MW-204DMW-204SMW-4RMW-4DMW-4R2PZ-3PZ-2PZ-1MW-3RMW-104MW-2MW-102RW-120MW-103MW-105OXOBOXOBROOKOXOBOXOBROOKAREA 1AREA 2AREA 3AREA 4AREA 6CLEAN FILL AREAREMEDIATION TARGET AREAS OF CONCERN:1. FORMER AST AND PAH IMPACTED SOIL2. METALS IMPACTED SOIL IN ALLEY3. PAH, METALS AND VOC IMPACTED SOIL (EXTERIOR)4. VOC IMPACTED SOIL (INTERIOR)5. LIMITED PAHS IN OXOBOXO BROOK SEDIMENTS6. VOC IMPACTED SOIL AND FORMER ONSITE SEPTIC TANKAND FIELDAREA 1AREA OF CLEAN FILLPLACED 2016(10 FT HIGH +/-)TELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERSVE WELLGROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREATWELLSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLSRW-101RW-301SRW-302SRW-303DRW-303SRW-304SRW-301SAREA 50100'200'AREA OF CONCERNSEE NOTE 3SV-1 GRAN. MS.W/DRILL HOLEBROKENCHDGRAN. MS.W/DRILL HOLEHELTCO6567PRI-M215EXIST.CHDBRIDGEOHW CPCO6564CL&P6255CL&P6256POLE12793POLE2746SNET2952SIGNLP TANKSLPCL&P2744SIGNPRI-M216SIGN UTUTUTW CL&P2745SIGNA/CGWUTGGWAREA463,658 S.F.10.6441 AC.ELC- UGNDOHWTRANSPADUTW SIGNFLAGPOLESGUTOHW UT WGWWWAPPROX. LOC. 6" W.M.WWAPPROX. LOC. 8" W.M.WWWAPPROX. LOC. 6" W.M.WHELTCO6566HELTCO6565WWWWWAPPROX.LOC.12"&16"W.M.WWW W WWW W W12"&16"WWW12"&16"W W6" GG16" GGG GG16"16"16" G . M .WWWW 6"6" W.M.O H W W W12"&16" W.M.POLEPOLEHELTCO6568HELTCO6570A/CTRANSWAPPROX. LOC . 6" W .M.PRI-M217SUPPORTPOLES WW WWELL UTWUTWWVUTA/CWGLPLPWWWVW WWW W WUT UT UTUTWWW Soil VaporExtraction SystemTrailerELC- UGNDELC- UGNDLP TANKSLPCL&PCL&P27452745ELC- UGNDELC- UGNDOHWUT WWPOLEPOLEA/CTRANSWAPPROX. LOC . 6" W .M.APPROX. LOC . 6" W .M.APPROX. LOC . 6" W .M.ELC- UGNDELC- UGNDELC- UGNDELC- UGNDPROPOSED IN-SITU CHEMICALOXIDATION TREATMENT AREAFARIA INDUSTRIES42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:VTITFC91730.00JANUARY 2019FIGURE 30100'200'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETNOTES:1. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASEMAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES3. ELECTRON CAPTURE DEVICE IMAGE FROM HIGHRESOLUTION SITE CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS PUBLISHEDBY AEI, 2014.LEGENDAPPROXIMATE MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONMW-200MW-202RMW-202PZMW-205SMW-205DMW-201MW-204DMW-204SMW-4RMW-4DMW-4R2PZ-3PZ-2PZ-1MW-3RMW-104MW-2MW-102RW-120MW-103MW-105OXOBOXOBROOKOXOBOXOBROOKCLEAN FILL AREALIST OF AOCs:1. FORMER AST AND PAH IMPACTED SOIL2. METALS IMPACTED SOIL IN ALLEY3. PAH, METALS AND VOC IMPACTED SOIL (EXTERIOR)4. VOC IMPACTED SOIL (INTERIOR)5. LIMITED PAHS IN OXOBOXO BROOK SEDIMENTS6. SOUTHERN PARKING LOT - VOC IMPACTED SOIL ANDFORMER SEPTIC TANK AND LEACH FIELDTELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERSVE WELLGROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREATWELLSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLSRW-101RW-301SRW-302SRW-303DRW-303SRW-304SAREA OF PROPOSED CHEMICALINJECTIONSSEE NOTE 3DAK-2 S/DRW-304SDAK-3 S/DPROPOSED GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELLS(SHALLOW/DEEP)Recovery WellManifold Vault(UNGD)SVE-2SVE-1DAK-2 S/DMW-200RW-301SSVE-2 BRIDGESMHTF=23.66LP TANKSLPCL&P2744R.O .SIGN25x8CL&P2745ELC- UGNDRAMPOHWUT WGWWSANLATINV=13.06(IN S)WWW12"&16"GGG G16"16 " G. M .WWW6"6" W.M.POLEPOLEBUILDING M-10BUILDING M-13UILDING M-12CHIMNEYFFL=29.95A/CTRANSWAPPROX. LOC. 6" W.M.BUILDING M-10APAVILLIONROOFELC- UGNDELC- UGNDIN-SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATIONTREATMENT AREA DETAILFARIA INDUSTRIES42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:VTITFC91730.00JANUARY 2019FIGURE 4ANOTES:1. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASE MAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES3. ELECTRON CAPTURE DEVICE IMAGE FROM HIGHRESOLUTION SITE CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS PUBLISHEDBY AEI, 2014.LEGENDAPPROXIMATE MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONMW-1CLEAN FILL AREATELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERGROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREATWELLSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLS030'60'MW-205SMW-205DMW-4RMW-4DMW-4R2PZ-3PZ-2PZ-1MW-3RMW-104MW-2OXOBOXOBROOKRW-301SRW-302SRW-303DRW-303S030'60'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETRW-101SVE-2SVE-1Recovery WellManifold Vault(UNGD)TREATMENT AREAAPPROXIMATELY 18,000 SQFTMW-10SMW-10DMW-M9SDAK-1 S/DDAK-2 S/DDAK-3 S/DRW-101SV-1DAK-1 S/DPROPOSED GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELL (SHALLOW/DEEP)TREATMENT AREAAPPROXIMATELY 2,000 SQFT BRIDGESMHTF=23.66LP TANKSLPCL&P2744R.O .SIGN25x8CL&P2745ELC- UGNDRAMPOHWUT WGWWSANLATINV=13.06(IN S)WWW12"&16"GGG G16"16 " G. M .WWW6"6" W.M.POLEPOLEBUILDING M-10BUILDING M-13UILDING M-12CHIMNEYFFL=29.95A/CTRANSWAPPROX. LOC. 6" W.M.BUILDING M-10APAVILLIONROOFELC- UGNDELC- UGNDCL&PCL&P2745POLECL&PCL&P27452745UGNDDOHWEELLC-ULLCC-UUGGNNDEELLCC-UGNDDRAMPEELLRAMPPOLE9.95FFL=2A/CLPUT UILDINGM-13TRANSTRANSPAVILLIONLPTANKSWWBUWOC.6"W.M.PAVILLIONROOF12X.LOIN-SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATIONTREATMENT AREA DETAILFARIA INDUSTRIES42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CTPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DATE:CHECKED BY:VTITFC91730.00JANUARY 2019FIGURE 4B030'60'HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEETNOTES:1. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED FROM BASE MAP PROVIDEDELECTRONICALLY BY AESCHLIMAN LAND SURVEYING, PC.DATED DECEMBER, 2013.2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE FEATURES DEPICTED AREAPPROXIMATE AND GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES3. ELECTRON CAPTURE DEVICE IMAGE FROM HIGHRESOLUTION SITE CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS PUBLISHEDBY AEI, 2014.LEGENDAPPROXIMATE MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONMW-1CLEAN FILL AREATELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERGROUNDWATER PUMP AND TREATWELLSOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLS030'60'MW-205SMW-205DMW-4RMW-4DMW-4R2PZ-3PZ-2PZ-1MW-3RMW-104MW-2OXOBOXOBROOKRW-301SRW-302SRW-303DRW-303SRW-101SVE-2SVE-1Recovery WellManifold Vault(UNGD)TREATMENT AREAAPPROXIMATELY 18,000 SQFTMW-10SMW-10DMW-M9SDAK-1 S/DDAK-2 S/DDAK-3 S/DRW-101SV-1DAK-1 S/DPROPOSED GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELL (SHALLOW/DEEP)TREATMENT AREAAPPROXIMATELY 2,000 SQFT FariaBuildingGneiss/Granitic GneissMW-10DMW-4RRW-101RW-303DMW-205DMW-314DMW-10SRW-303SMW-205S23 Pink RowSiltBedrockGW Table NOTES:MW-314SAA'SepticWell Grout Casing Installed in Bedrock 65-75'20' NOffset distance and direction from A-A'MW-10sScreenMonitoring WellDesignationSB-405SB-400SB-406SiltSand and GravelSand and Gravel10' SVTIProject:GEOLOGIC PROFILE A-A'PROPOSED ISCO AREAFARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS42 PINK ROWUNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUTNovember 2018FIGURE 5Checked by:TFCDate:LEGEND:1. See figure for location of profile.2. Profile is based on boring logs for MW-4R, RW-101, RW-303S/D, SB-400, SB-406, SB-405, and MW-314S/D. Boring logs were not available for MW-10S/D and MW-205S/D3. Dashed lines show inferred geologic profile and groundwater table elevations where data are missing.4. Groundwater elevation do not reflect pumping conditions.Drawn by: Notes: Data obtained from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data download web page and Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online (CT ECO). The information was obtained from an internet download on October 10, 2018. SURFICIAL GEOLOGY FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS INC 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT Scale: See Map Figure No. 6 Drawn By: ANE Checked By: TFC Site 42 Pink Row Sand and Gravel Overlying Sand Gravel Overlying Sand and Gravel Overlying Sand Alluvium Overlying Sand and Gravel Coarse Gravel Glacial Till Notes: Data obtained from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data download web page and Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online (CT ECO). The information was obtained from an internet download on January 14, 2019. 122 Church Street Naugatuck, CT NATURAL DIVERSITY DATBASE AREA AND GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATIONS FARIA BEEDE INSTRUMENTS 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CT Scale: Approximately 1” = 600’ Figure No. 7 Drawn By: NBK Checked By: TFC APPENDIX 1 AECOM 2008 FIGURES SHOWING CONTAMINANTS IN SOIL SAMPLES Table 1Summary of Soil Sample Collection and Analysis - 2007Thomas G. FariaUncasville, ConnecticutSoil BoringIdentifierDepth(feet bgs)NumberofSamplesSample Depth (feet bgs) Analytes RationaleSB-328 25 2 15 - 17, 23 - 25 VOCs Delineate extent of VOCs in silt unit around MW-4.SB-329 25 215 - 17, 23 - 25VOCs Delineate extent of VOCs in silt unit around MW-4.SB-330 25 2 15 - 17, 23 - 25 VOCs Delineate extent of VOCs in silt unit around MW-4.SB-331 10.5 1 6 - 8 TAL Metals Evaluate inorganics in AOC 3.SB-332 9 1 6 - 8 TAL Metals Evaluate inorganics in AOC 3.SB-333 4 1 0 - 1 PAHs Delineate extent of shallow PAHs detected in AOC 10.SB-334 6 1 4 - 6 VOCs, metals, PAHs Delineate extent of VOCs detected at MW-102.SB-335 4 1 2 - 4 VOCs, metals, PAHs Delineate extent of VOCs detected at MW-102.Notes:bgs = Below ground surfaceAOC = Area of concernTAL metals = Target analyte list metalsPAHs = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsVOCs = Volatile organic compounds Table 2Summary of VOCs Detected in Soil - 2007Thomas G. FariaUncasville, ConnecticutDirect PollutantSB-328 SB-329 SB-329Exposure Mobility7/12/2007 7/13/2007 7/13/2007CHEMICALCriteria Criteria Units23 - 25 15 - 17 23 - 251,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 24000 20 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE500000 240000 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE11000 2000 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1,1-DICHLOROETHANE500000 240000 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U1 J1,1-DICHLOROETHENE1000 140 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U3 JACETONE500000 240000 ug/Kg 4 U6224 U 4 UBENZENE21000 20 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U0.9 J4 U 4 UCHLOROFORM100000 120 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UCIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE500000 28000 ug/Kg8.268415DICHLOROMETHANE82000 100 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UNAPHTHALENE2500000 5600 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTETRACHLOROETHENE12000 100 ug/Kg140 140 380 J 280 J 110TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 500000 2000 ug/Kg 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 4 UTRICHLOROETHENE56000 100 ug/Kg2623 140 J 2329VINYL CHLORIDE320 40 ug/Kg2.6 J 2 J2 J2 J9Notes:This is a summary table only. Only chemicals detected in at least one sample are presented.Detected compounds presented in bold text.VOCs = Volatile organic compounds.ug/Kg = Micrograms per kilogram.U = Chemical not detected above given laboratory reporting limit.J = Estimated value.Project action levels taken directly from the Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulation.Shading indicates exceedance of pollutant mobility criteria, which apply above the water table. Water table ranges from 7 to 12 feet below ground surface.15 - 17Project Action Levels Soil Boring, Date, Depth (feet) and ConcentrationSB-3287/12/2007 Table 2Summary of VOCs Detected in Soil - 2007Thomas G. FariaUncasville, ConnecticutDirect PollutantExposure MobilityCHEMICAL Criteria Criteria Units1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 24000 20 ug/Kg1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 500000 240000 ug/Kg1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11000 2000 ug/Kg1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 500000 240000 ug/Kg1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 1000 140 ug/KgACETONE 500000 240000 ug/KgBENZENE 21000 20 ug/KgCHLOROFORM 100000 120 ug/KgCIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 500000 28000 ug/KgDICHLOROMETHANE 82000 100 ug/KgNAPHTHALENE 2500000 5600 ug/KgTETRACHLOROETHENE 12000 100 ug/KgTRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 500000 2000 ug/KgTRICHLOROETHENE 56000 100 ug/KgVINYL CHLORIDE 320 40 ug/KgNotes:This is a summary table only. Only chemicals detected in at least one sample are presented.Detected compounds presented in bold text.VOCs = Volatile organic compounds.ug/Kg = Micrograms per kilogram.U = Chemical not detected above given laboratory reporting limit.J = Estimated value.Project action levels taken directly from the Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulation.Shading indicates exceedance of pollutant mobility criteria, which apply above the water table.Project Action LevelsSB-334 SB-3357/14/2007 7/14/200715 - 17 23 - 25 4 - 6 2 - 43 U 3 U 4 UJ2 J3 U 3 U4 J 12 J3 U 3 U 4 UJ4 J3 U 3 U 4 UJ 4 UJ3 U 3 U 4 UJ 4 UJ3 U2 J4 UJ 4 UJ3 U 3 U 4 UJ 4 UJ3 U 3 U 4 UJ1 J3 U 3 U 4 UJ34 J3 U 3 U 4 UJ6 J3 U 3 U47210 U3 U 3 U140 J 2,1003 U 3 U 4 UJ1 J3 U 3 U2 J 23 J3 U 3 U 4 UJ 4 UJWater table ranges from 7 to 12 feet below ground surface.SB-3307/12/2007Soil Boring, Date, Depth (feet) and Concentration Table 3Summary of CVOCs Detected in Soil Vapor - 2007Thomas G. FariaUncasville, ConnecticutProposedIndustrial/Commercial SB-334 SB-335CHEMICALVolatilization Criteria Units 7/14/20077/14/2007ACETONE290ppmv1.054.31 UCARBON DISULFIDENEppmv0.789 J1.08 UDICHLOROMETHANE6.8ppmv0.7022.16 UISOPROPANOLNEppmv4.681.08 UTETRACHLOROETHENE1ppmv5.5267.3Notes:This is a summary table only. Only chemicals detected in at least one sample are presented.NE = No established criterion.Detected compounds presented in bold text.U = Chemical not detected above given laboratory reporting limit.J = Estimated value.Shading indicates exceedance of volatilization criteria.Sample Location, Date, and Concentration Table 4Summary of Metals Detected in Soil - 2007Thomas G. FariaUncasville, ConnecticutDirect PollutantSB-331SB-334 SB-335Exposure Mobility7/12/20077/14/2007 7/14/2007CHEMICAL NAME Criteria Criteria Unit 6 - 8 4 - 6 2 - 4ALUMINUM 76,000* mg/Kg23,800 EB 7,340 EB 7,790 EB 5,230 EB 4,520 EBARSENIC 10 mg/Kg9.0 J 23 J 23.2 J 7.2 J 3.0 JSPLP ARSENIC 50 ug/L 5 U 5 U 5 UBARIUM 4,700 mg/Kg73.0 EB 33.4 EB 38.4 EB 167 EB 78.6 EBSPLP BARIUM 20 ug/L 100 U 100 U 100 UBERYLLIUM 2 mg/Kg1.4 J 0.3 J 0.34 J 0.46 J 0.36 JBERYLLIUM 4 ug/L 2.5 U 2.5 U 2.5 UCADMIUM 34 mg/Kg1.8 J 0.38 J 0.37 J 1.2 JRSPLP CADMIUM 5 ug/L2.92.5 U 2.5 UCALCIUM METAL mg/Kg49346 U 45 U1,290 1,590CHROMIUM (TOTAL) 3,900 mg/Kg27.6 28.1 29.6 15.3 37.7SPLP CHROMIUM (TOTAL) 50 ug/L 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJCOBALT 900* mg/Kg8.4 JRR4.2 J 4.4 JCOPPER 2,500 mg/Kg92.6 J 95.3 J 51.9 J 264 J 61.3 JSPLP COPPER 1,300 ug/L 15 U33.1 38IRON 23,000* mg/Kg30,800 EB 39,900 EB 41,700 EB 7,570 EB 11,800 EBLEAD 500 0.3 mg/Kg35.8 J 9.3 J 10.3 J 112 J 69.1 JMAGNESIUM mg/Kg2,860 JEB 2,050 JEB 2,190 JEB 1,120 JEB 1,250 JEBMANGANESE 1,800* mg/Kg265 J 156 J 162 J 70.1 J 252 JMERCURY 20 mg/Kg0.094 0.048 0.038 0.11 0.3SPLP MERCURY 2 ug/L 0.20 UJ 0.20 UJ 0.20 UJNICKEL 1,400 mg/Kg21.7 JEB 5.8 JEB 6 JEB 12.5 JEB 9.2 JEBSPLP NICKEL 100 ug/L 25 U 25 U 25 UPOTASSIUM mg/Kg1,260 EB 713 EB 946 EB 1,040 EB 629 EBSELENIUM 340 mg/Kg3.4 JRR2.2 J 1.3 JSPLP SELENIUM 50 ug/L 15 U 15 U 15 USODIUM mg/Kg189 EB 174 EB 172 EB 510 EB 538 EBTHALLIUM 5.4 mg/Kg3.6 J 6.6 J 6.7 J 1.1 J 1.8 JSPLP THALLIUM 5 ug/L 5 U 5 U 5 UVANADIUM 470 mg/Kg44.4 EB 30.8 EB 32.5 EB 16.9 JEB 14.2 JEBSPLP VANADIUM 50 ug/L 25 U 25 U 25 UZINC 20,000 mg/Kg427 J 25.2 J 25.8 J 163 J 317 JSPLP ZINC 5,000 ug/L373 30.9 53.1Notes:Only compounds which were detected in at least one sample are shown.Blank spaces indicate sample not analyzed for given chemical.Detects are bolded.* Indicates that project action level is based on a EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remedial Goal (PRG) or soil screening level default value. All other criteria per Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulation.Yellow shading indicates exceedance of Direct Exposure Criteria. Direct exposure criteria apply at depths less than 15 feet bgs.U = Non-detect at laboratory detection limitJ = Estimated ValueEB = Indeterminate amount of equipment blank contamination noted.B = Indeterminate amount of laboratory blank contamination noted.Project Action LevelsSoil Boring, Date, Depth (feet) and Concentration 6 - 87/12/2007SB-332 Table 5Summary of PAHs Detected in Soil - 2007Thomas G. FariaUncasville, ConnecticutProject Action LevelsDirect Pollutant SB-333 SB-334 SB-335Exposure Mobility 7/13/2007 7/14/2007 7/14/2007Chemical Name Criteria Criteria Unit 0 - 1 4 - 6 2 - 4ACENAPHTHENE 1,000,000 8,400 ug/Kg390 34 40ACENAPHTHYLENE 1,000,000 8,400 ug/Kg120 16 95ANTHRACENE 1,000,000 40,000 ug/Kg970 120 230BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 1,000 1,000 ug/Kg2,500 380 J 1,200BENZO(A)PYRENE 1,000 1,000 ug/Kg2,100 280 J 1,200BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 1,000 1,000 ug/Kg2,600 360 1,200BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE 1,000,000 4,200 ug/Kg1,700 J 150 J 1,300BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 8,400 1,000 ug/Kg1,200 J 150 J 550CHRYSENE 84,000 1,000 ug/Kg2,700 480 J 1,200DIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENE 1,000 1,000 ug/Kg450 J 47 J 150 JFLUORANTHENE 1,000,000 5,600 ug/Kg5,600 550 1,600FLUORENE 1,000,000 5,600 ug/Kg390 32 36INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE 1,000 1,000 ug/Kg1,800 J 130 J 1,2002-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 474,000 980 ug/Kg190 J 22 J 23 JNAPHTHALENE 2,500,000 5,600 ug/Kg560 J 47 J 32 JPHENANTHRENE 1,000,000 4,000 ug/Kg5,400 620 1,100PYRENE 1,000,000 4,000 ug/Kg4,800 410 1,600Notes:Only compounds which were detected in at least one sample are shown.Detects are bolded.J = Estimated ValueYellow shading indicates exceedance of Connecticut Direct Exposure Criteria, which does not apply beneath site buildings.Blue shading indicates exceedance of Connecticut Pollutant Mobility Criteria, which does not apply beneath site buildings.Green shading indicates exceedance of both criteria.Soil borings SB-334 and SB-335 were collected beneath site buildings.Sample Location, Date, Depth (feet), and Concentration < <<< < < << < <<<< << < < < < < < ? ? ? ? ? DEPOT ROAD OXOBOXO BROOK PINK ROWBUILDING M-13 BUILDINGM-14 BUILDINGM-12 BUILDINGM-11 BUILDINGM-10 BUILDINGM-10-A BUILDINGM-6 BUILDINGM-5 BUILDINGM-8 BUILDINGM-7 BUILDINGM-4A BUILDINGM-4 MW-200 MW-201 MW-202R MW-202PZ PZ-3 PZ-2 PZ-1 MW-5 MW-3S MW-5D MW-4RMW-4D MW-3R MW-02 RW-101 MW-104 MW-105 MW-102 MW-4S MW-3D MW-4R2 MW-103 RW-120 RW-401 Figure Number: Sheet Number:Scale:Date:Project Number:J:\Indl_Service\Project Files\Faria_10125001\GIS\Projects\12-07\Figure 1 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations.mxd1 1" = 70'1/0810125-002-00101 µPROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONSTHOMAS G. FARIA CORP.UNCASVILLE, CTENSR CORPORATION2 TECHNOLOGY PARK DRIVEWESTFORD, MA 01886PHONE: (978) 589-3000WEB: WWW.ENSR.AECOM.COM0 70 14035 Feet Basemap is 2004 Digital Orthoimagery from Connecticut DEP. Note: Legend <Monitoring Well Piezometer? Proposed Monitoring Well? ! ! ! ! ! < < < < ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B-109 VOCs (ug/kg) (10-12) DICHLOROMETHANE 390 TETRACHLOROETHENE 4000 B-111 VOCs (ug/kg) (14-16) TETRACHLOROETHENE 1600 B-112 VOCs (ug/kg) (12-14) TETRACHLOROETHENE 560 B-117 VOCs (ug/kg) (12-14) TETRACHLOROETHENE 1500 B-119 VOCs (ug/kg) (10-12) TETRACHLOROETHENE 1400 MW-103 VOCs (ug/kg) (5-7) TETRACHLOROETHENE 300000 TRICHLOROETHENE 1600 MW-104 VOCs (ug/kg) (10-12) 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 17000 DICHLOROMETHANE 7800 TETRACHLOROETHENE 65000 TRICHLOROETHENE 4100 MW-4R2 VOCs (ug/kg) (18.5-19) (23-25) TETRACHLOROETHENE 550 1900 MW-102 VOCs (ug/kg) (10-12) DICHLOROMETHANE 3500 TETRACHLOROETHENE 91000 TRICHLOROETHENE 5600 SB-304 VOCs (ug/kg) (6-7) TETRACHLOROETHENE 33000 SB-309 VOCs (ug/kg) (17-19) (23-25) TETRACHLOROETHENE 4500 1000 SB-310 VOCs (ug/kg) (23-25) (29-31) TETRACHLOROETHENE 1700 940 TRICHLOROETHENE 330 SB-311 VOCs (ug/kg) (21-23) (23-25) TETRACHLOROETHENE 11000 1300 SB-312 VOCs (ug/kg) (15-17) (23-25) TETRACHLOROETHENE 220J 300 SB-314 VOCs (ug/kg) (15-17) TETRACHLOROETHENE 300 SB-323 VOCs (ug/kg) (19-21) TETRACHLOROETHENE 5400 TRICHLOROETHENE 130 SB-328 VOCs (ug/kg) (14-16) (14-16)(DUP) (22-24) TETRACHLOROETHENE 140 140 380J TRICHLOROETHENE 140J SB-329 VOCs (ug/kg) (14-16) (22-24) TETRACHLOROETHENE 280J 110 SB-334 VOCs (ug/kg) (2-4) TETRACHLOROETHENE 140J SB-335 VOCs (ug/kg) (2-4) TETRACHLOROETHENE 2100 BUILDINGM-7 DEPOT ROAD OXOBOXO BROOK PINK ROWBUILDINGM-4A BUILDINGM-4 BUILDINGM-8 BUILDINGM-5 BUILDINGM-6 BUILDINGM-11 BUILDINGM-14 BUILDING M-13 BUILDINGM-12 BUILDINGM-10BUILDINGM-10-A B-109 MW-4R2 MW-103 B-119 B-117 B-112 B-111 SB-335 SB-334 SB-329 SB-328 SB-323 SB-314 SB-312 SB-311SB-310SB-309 SB-304 MW-104 MW-102 SB-330 Figure Number: Sheet Number:Scale:Date:Project Number:J:\Indl_Service\Project Files\Faria_10125001\GIS\Projects\12-07\Figure 2 Soil VOCs 2006 onsite.mxd1 1" = 70'1/0810125-002-00102 µVOCs IN SOILTHOMAS G. FARIA CORP.UNCASVILLE, CTENSR CORPORATION2 TECHNOLOGY PARK DRIVEWESTFORD, MA 01886PHONE: (978) 589-3000WEB: WWW.ENSR.AECOM.COM0 70 14035 Feet Basemap is 2004 Digital Orthoimagery from Connecticut DEP. Note: Legend <Monitoring Well !Soil Boring Green values indicate exceedences and Pollutant Mobility Black values depict values where Pollutant Mobility Criteria do not apply. ND = No VOCs detected U = Chemical not detected above given detection limit J = Estimated valueug/kg = Micrograms per Kilogram Sample depth given in feet below grade. !!!!!E!E SS-9 Metals (mg/kg) (0-1) ARSENIC 21.2 DEPOT ROADOXOBOXOBROOKPINK ROW SB-300 Metals (mg/kg) (0-.5) ARSENIC 12.4J LEAD 1500J SB-301 Metals (mg/kg) (0-.5) (1-1.5) ARSENIC 29.7J 148J LEAD 779J SB-331 Metals (mg/kg) (6-8) ARSENIC 13.0371 SB-332 Metals (mg/kg) (6-8) (6-8)(DUP) ARSENIC 23J 23.2J SS-11 Metals (mg/L) (0-.5) LEAD 0.04 SS-9SS-11SB-332SB-331SB-301SB-300Figure Number:Sheet Number:Scale:Date:Project Number:J:\Indl_Service\Project Files\Faria_10125001\GIS\Projects\12-07\Figure 3 Soil Metals onsite_Rev.mxd11" = 70'1/0810125-002-00103µSVOCs IN SOILTHOMAS G. FARIA CORP.UNCASVILLE, CTENSR CORPORATION2 TECHNOLOGY PARK DRIVEWESTFORD, MA 01886PHONE: (978) 589-3000WEB: WWW.ENSR.AECOM.COM07014035FeetBasemap is 2004 Digital Orthoimagery fromConnecticut DEP.Note:Red values indicate Direct Exposure Critieria exceedance.Green values indicate Pollutant Mobility Criteria exceedance.ND = No SVOCs detectedU = Chemical not detected above given detection limitJ = Estimated valueug/kg = Micrograms per KilogramSample depth given in feet below grade.Legend!Soil Boring<Monitoring WellSoil Sample!E !E!E!E!E!E!E!EDEPOT ROADOXOBOXOBROOKPINK ROW MW-102 SVOCs (ug/kg) (10-12) BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 1800 BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 1300 BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 1600 PHENANTHRENE 4800 SB-316 SVOCs (ug/kg) (0-.5) BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 1100J SB-333 SVOCs (ug/kg) (0-2) BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 2500 BENZO(A)PYRENE 2100 BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 2600 BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 1200J INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE 1800J PHENANTHRENE 5400 PYRENE 4800 SS-10 SVOCs (ug/kg) (0-.5) BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 8900 BENZO(A)PYRENE 1700 BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 8400 BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 9300 CHRYSENE 9500 INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE 3600 FLUORANTHENE 20000 PHENANTHRENE 12000 PYRENE 22000 SS-11 SVOCs (ug/kg) (0-.5) BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 15000 BENZO(A)PYRENE 14000 BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 12000 BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 17000 CHRYSENE 16000 FLUORANTHENE 38000 PHENANTHRENE 31000 PYRENE 40000 SS-12 SVOCs (ug/kg) (0-.5) 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 4800 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 16000 BENZO(A)PYRENE 2800 BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 12000 BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 16000 CHRYSENE 17000 INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE 5500 FLUORANTHENE 42000 PHENANTHRENE 46000 PYRENE 44000 CARBAZOLE 5500 SS-13 SVOCs (ug/kg) (0-.5) BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 4400 BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 4000 BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 4900 FLUORANTHENE 10000 PHENANTHRENE 8600 PYRENE 10000 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 3800 SS-13SS-12SS-11SS-10MW-102SB-333SB-316Figure Number:Sheet Number:Scale:Date:Project Number:J:\Indl_Service\Project Files\Faria_10125001\GIS\Projects\12-07\Figure 4 Soil SVOCs onsite.mxd11" = 70'1/0810125-002-00104µSVOCs IN SOILTHOMAS G. FARIA CORP.UNCASVILLE, CTENSR CORPORATION2 TECHNOLOGY PARK DRIVEWESTFORD, MA 01886PHONE: (978) 589-3000WEB: WWW.ENSR.AECOM.COM07014035FeetBasemap is 2004 Digital Orthoimagery fromConnecticut DEP.Note:Red values indicate project action level exceedance.Green values indicate Pollutant Mobility Criteria exceedance.ND = No SVOCs detectedU = Chemical not detected above given detection limitJ = Estimated valueug/kg = Micrograms per KilogramSample depth given in feet below grade.LegendSoil Sample!E APPENDIX 2 AEI SELECTED CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION 2012 to CURRENT Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)MW-102Screened Interval (ft bg)14-24Date Sampled11/13/13 6/8/16 11/12/13 11/20/14 6/8/16 11/12/13 11/13/13 11/20/14Is Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)YESUSEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000 ND ND ND ND ND NDND NDBenzene 710 215 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEthylbenzene 580,000 50,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDToluene 4,000,000 23,500 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDVinyl Chloride 15,7502ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,1 -DCA** 4,100 34,600 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,1-DCE 961ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDcis 1,2-DCE** 6,200 ND ND 2.5 ND ND ND ND NDtrans 1,2-DCE** 10,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,1,1 -TCA 62,000 20,400 ND ND 1.3 ND ND ND ND ND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDTrichloroethylene 2,340219ND ND2.9 ND NDNDNDNDTetrachloroethylene88 1,500ND ND 6.0 ND 1.1 1.7 5.6 4.5Tetrahydrofuran* 9,600 250 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDXylenes** 270 21,300ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*YES YES10-20 9.85-19.85 17-27MW-105 MW-2 MW-103Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)ONSITE UPGRADIENT NORTH OF OXOBOXONo Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 1 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.PZ-15-2011/13/13 11/20/14 11/12/13 11/21/14 11/13/13 11/13/13 6/8/16 6/8/16YESND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND 1.2NDNDNDND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND 9.6 5.8 ND ND ND 8.9ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND 11ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND 4.8 6.9 1.0 ND ND 9.06.7 15 9.4 28 ND ND 18 2.3ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDYES40-5014-24 46-58RW-120MW-3R(BRX) MW-104ONSITE FORMER AERATION BASIN AREAADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 2 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.MW-4D (RE1)MW-4R(BRX)MW-4R andMW-4RDilution MW-4R2unknown unknown11/11/13 11/21/14 11/13/13 11/13/13 6/23/17 11/13/13 6/10/16 6/26/17YESND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND2.9 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / ND1.7 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / ND5.1ND ND ND ND / ND ND2.5/2.3(+)ND / ND29 ND ND 5.6 7.9 / 9.3 ND 4.2/3.6 1.1 / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND 11/9.6 4.2 / 3.7ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND / ND4708326020 25 / 30 ND 5.1/5.0 2.11,800 2,100 3,500 240 400 / 440ND380/350 400 / 350ND ND ND NDND / ND NDND ND / NDND ND ND NDND / ND NDNDND / ND66-75.55-20unknownMW-4DPZ-2 and PZ-2 DilutionONSITEFORMER SEPTIC AND LEACHING FIELD AREAADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 3 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.MW-M10S (RE1)26-2711/26/13 11/26/13 6/9/16 6/23/17 11/26/13 6/23/17 11/26/13 6/9/16 6/23/17 11/26/13ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND6.0 5.2 / NDND ND ND ND ND / ND ND4.9 ND 5.3 5.3 / ND ND ND 6.4 3.5 2.7 / ND ND3.5ND1.5 1.7 / NDND ND6.7 3.1 2.1 / NDND13 8.6 44/42 57 / 50 ND ND 9.0 18/15 17 / 16 5.6ND ND ND / ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND3.8 ND 2.3 2.4 / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND18 11 31/36 43 / 41 ND ND 53 120/130 120 / 120 34830 650 1800/1700 2,000 / 1,40023 ND990 1300/1100 1,100 / 910 800ND ND ND / ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND NDND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND26-2729-3044-45MW-M9S and MW-M9S DilutionMW-M9D MW-10S and 10S with DilutionFORMER SEPTIC AND LEACHING FIELD AREAONSITEADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 4 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.MW-5unknown11/26/13 6/23/17 11/12/1311/12/13 11/20/14 11/11//13 11/20/14 6/10/16 6/23/17 11/11/13 6/23/17ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND 2.1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND8.1 16 5.3 ND ND 3.7 5.6 ND ND 1.1 7.8ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDMW-10D41-42MW-204S8-18MW-204D40-50YESunknownMW-5DFORMER SEPTIC AND LEACHING FIELD AREAONSITEADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 5 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.GW-CGW-B11/15/13 11/20/14 6/9/16 11/20/00 11/15/13 11/21/14 11/15/13 6/9/16 6/22/17 11/20/00YESND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND 1.8 ND ND ND ND ND ND1.6ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1.6 ND 1.3 2.8 1.9 ND ND ND 1.5 NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND 1.8 2.4 ND 2.2 ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND3.9 3.4 3.9 5.2 41 29 36 8.8 7.8 4.068 66 58 37350 340 320 90 9938ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND25.5-35.5MW -205S8-18YESMW-200OFFSITEACROSS PINK ROWADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 6 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.GW-EMW-205D and MW-205D withDilution GW-D11/20/00 11/15/13 11/21/14 11/15/13 11/21/14 6/22/17 11/15/13 11/21/14 11/20/000YESND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND 3.7 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND 1.1 / ND ND ND NDND 1.2 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND NDND6.5ND ND ND11 / NDND ND NDND 31 ND ND ND 22 / ND ND ND NDND72ND33ND39 / NDND ND NDND 31 ND ND ND 36 / ND ND ND NDND 1.0 ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND NDND 12 ND ND ND 5.7 / ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND ND6.622098 110240 240 / NDND ND ND110 1,800 5,100 3,500 9,800 9,500 / 15,0003.1 4.3 NDND ND ND ND ND ND / ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND 2.3 / ND ND ND ND52-62MW-205D MW-20135-45ACROSS PINK ROWOFFSITEADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 7 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.MW-201 DugMW-202R (RE1)unknown 39-5911/15/13 11/15/13 6/10/16 6/23/17 11/15/13 6/23/17 11/15/13YESND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND 6.2 2.6 5.9ND ND1.6 1.3 15 4.5 14ND ND 1.5 1.5 15 7.0 13ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND 1.1 1.2 9.2 2.5 8.4ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND 1.0 3.9 4.1 33 24 30ND 19 71 88400 280 390ND ND ND ND ND ND NDND ND ND ND ND ND NDMW-202R(BRX)39-59MW-202PZ28-38ACROSS PINK ROWOFFSITEADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 8 of 9 Table 4DGroundwater Sampling Results Compared to Residential Volatilization Criteria Only (Showing Exceedances with GB Reclassification)Faria Beede InstrumentsUncasville, ConnecticutSWPC (µg/L)Screened Interval (ft bg)Date SampledIs Well Screend above 15 ft bg?(1)USEPA Method 8260C Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Acetone* 10,00050,000Benzene 710 215Ethylbenzene 580,000 50,000Toluene 4,000,000 23,500Vinyl Chloride 15,75021,1 -DCA**4,100 34,6001,1-DCE961cis 1,2-DCE**6,200trans 1,2-DCE**10,0001,1,1 -TCA62,000 20,4001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane112Trichloroethylene2,340219Tetrachloroethylene881,500Tetrahydrofuran*9,600250Xylenes**27021,300* - RVC from CTDEEP 3/8/2016 Technical Document** Alt Criteria570*Analyte1996 ResidentialVolatilization Criteria for Ground Water (µg/L)No Entry or ND indicates the Parameter was not detected above the laboratory report limit.NotesDupNEµg/L(1)= Duplicate sample.= None established.= Micrograms per liter.= VC applies to ground water within 15 ft. of ground surface.= Nondiluted/Diluted results.= Concentration exceeds associated criterion.RW-301 RW-302 RW-303S RW-304 RW-303D MW-311 MW-312COMP1-4S+DCOMP1-4S8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17 8/29/17YES YES YES YESYESYES N/A N/AND / ND ND / ND ND ND81/ NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND 3.4 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND 1.9 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND6.6 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND 6.6 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND13 / NDNDND ND ND / ND2.6 / 2.5 ND / ND 2.5 ND 27 / NDNDND ND1.8 / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND ND / NDNDND ND ND / ND2.7 / 2.4 1.2 / ND ND ND 1.2 / NDNDND ND ND / NDND / ND ND / ND ND ND2.6 / NDNDND NDND / ND2.8 / 2.5 41 / 37 7.0 ND 120 / 100NDND21 17 / 15ND / ND ND / ND120791,900 / 16,00085ND1,300 530 / 440ND / ND ND / ND ND 10 150 / NDNDNDND 13 / NDND / NDND / NDND ND 3.9 / NDNDNDNDND / NDONSITEFORMER SEPTIC AND LEACHING FIELD AREAADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACE, INC.AEI-13A-008Page 9 of 9 OxoboxoBrookPink RowRoute 32Depot RoadApproximate PropertyBoundaryPavedParkingPavedParkingPavedPavedParkingBuildingM-4ABuildingM-7BuildingM-8BuildingM-4BuildingM-5BuildingM-6BuildingM-11BuildingM-10ABuildingM-10BuildingM-12BuildingM-14PavilionTrailersDugWellOxoboxoBrookDrivewayWoodedWoodedWoodedBuildingM-13LawnLawnLawnLawnRetaining WallRetaining WallRetaining WallRetaining WallRetaining WallsRetaining WallLawnLawnTrailerWoodedWoodedMW-103RW-120MW-102MW-104MW-3RMW-4DMW-204DNSEWRW-101BridgeMW-200MW-205DDate: May 2016Figure 6A: Site Layout with DeepOverburden Ground Water ElevationContours, May 21, 2016Project No.: AEI-13A-008Location: Thomas G. Faria, Corp. 42 Pink Row Uncasville, ConnecticutMap Source:Environmental Basemap, #42 Pink Row,10/24/2013 Aeschliman Land Surveying, PCMiscellaneous AECOM Figures048 80160Approximate Scale in Feet(all locations are approximate)AdvancedEnvironmentalInterface, Inc.SwaleS wal e Pink RowNotes:MW-2= Ground Water Monitoring Well LocationGround water levels were measured on May 21, 2016.20.9021.4220.8020.7820.2321.2722.3521.95-5.53MW-10DMW-4RMW-9D APPENDIX 3 OXIDANT INFORMATION FROM PEROXYCHEM Field App. Instructions Application Method Direct Push Spacing Within Rows (ft)12 Spacing Between Rows (ft)12 Target Treatment Zone (TTZ) Info Unit Value Injection Points (per app.)24 Treatment Area ft2 3,500 Number of Applications 1 Top Treat Depth ft 10.0 Areal Extent (square ft)3,500 Field Mixing Ratios Bot Treat Depth ft 60.0 Top Application Depth (ft bgs)10 Water per Pt per app (gals) Vertical Treatment Interval ft 50.0 Bottom Application Depth (ft bgs)60 1054 Treatment Zone Volume ft3 175,000 PersulfOx to be Applied (lbs)40,223 PersulfOx per Pt per app (lbs) Treatment Zone Volume cy 6,481 PersulfOx Solution %16%1676 Soil Type ---silty sand Volume Water (gals)25,305 Total Volume per Pt per app (gals) Porosity cm3/cm3 0.40 Total Volume (gals)27,316 1138 Effective Porosity cm3/cm3 0.20 Per Application Totals Treatment Zone Pore Volume gals 523,636 PersulfOx per app. (lbs)40,223 Volume per vertical ft (gals) Treatment Zone Effective Pore Volume gals 261,818 Volume Water per app. (gals)25,305 23 Fraction Organic Carbon (foc)g/g 0.003 Total Volume per app. (gals)27,316 Soil Density g/cm3 1.6 Soil Density lb/ft3 100 Soil Weight lbs 1.7E+07 Hydraulic Conductivity ft/day 10.0 Hydraulic Conductivity cm/sec 3.53E-03 Hydraulic Gradient ft/ft 0.005 GW Velocity ft/day 0.25 GW Velocity ft/yr 91 Sources of Oxidant Demand Unit Value Sorbed Phase Contaminant Mass lbs 266 Dissolved Phase Contaminant Mass lbs 74.7 Total Contaminant Mass lbs 341 Stoichiometric PersulfOx Demand lbs 1,381 Stoichiometric PersulfOx Required lbs 1,381 Additional Soil Oxidant Demand g/kg 2.0 SOD PersulfOx Required lbs 38,836 Total PersulfOx Required lbs 40,218 PersulfOx Required lbs 40,223 Prepared By: Alana Miller Date:2/14/2019 Hot Spots Prepared For: Down to Earth Consulting, LLC Project Information PersulfOx® Application Design Summary Uncasville, CT Hot Spots Faria Beede Technical Notes/Discussion Application Dosing Assumptions/Qualifications In generating this preliminary estimate, Regenesis relied upon professional judgment and site specific information provided by others. Using this information as input, we performed calculations based upon known chemical and geologic relationships to generate an estimate of the mass of product and subsurface placement required to affect remediation of the site. REGENESIS developed this Scope of Work in reliance upon the data and professional judgments provided by those whom completed the earlier environmental site assessment(s). The fees and charges associated with the Scope of Work were generated through REGENESIS’ proprietary formulas and thus may not conform to billing guidelines, constraints or other limits on fees. REGENESIS does not seek reimbursement directly from any government agency or any governmental reimbursement fund (the “Government”). In any circumstance where REGENESIS may serve as a supplier or subcontractor to an entity which seeks reimbursement from the Government for all or part of the services performed or products provided by REGENESIS, it is the sole responsibility of the entity seeking reimbursement to ensure the Scope of Work and associated charges are in compliance with and acceptable to the Government prior to submission. When serving as a supplier or subcontractor to an entity which seeks reimbursement from the Government, REGENESIS does not knowingly present or cause to be presented any claim for payment to the Government. PersulfOx Technical Description Typically, sodium persulfate is activated with the addition of heat, chelated metals, hydrogen peroxide, or base in order to generate sulfate radicals. These activation processes are inherently complex, costly and can pose additional health and safety risks. In comparison, PersulfOx is a relatively safe and easy-to-use ISCO agent with a built-in catalyst which activates the persulfate component, generating contaminant-destroying free radicals without the need for the addition of a separate activator. The equation below shows the net complete oxidation of toluene, a constituent of gasoline, by PersulfOx: Chemical Composition • Sodium Persulfate - CAS #7775-27-1 • Sodium Silicate - CAS #1344-09-8 Properties • pH - 7 to 11.5 at 25°C • Appearance – White, free-flowing powder, clear to cloudy when mixed with water • Odor – Not detectable • Vapor Pressure – None • Chemical Hazard Classification - Class 5.1 Oxidizer PersulfOx is an In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) reagent that destroys organic contaminants found in groundwater and soil through powerful, yet controlled, chemical reactions. A sodium persulfate-based technology (figure 1), PersulfOx employs a patented catalyst to enhance the oxidative destruction of both hydrocarbons and chlorinated contaminants in the subsurface. Example of PersulfOx ® Storage and Handling Guidelines For a list of treatable contaminants with the use of PersulfOx, view the Range of Treatable Contaminants Guide Handling Store locked up Keep away from heat Store in a cool, dry place out of direct sunlight Minimize dust generation and accumulation Routine housekeeping should be instituted to ensure that dust does not accumulate on surfaces Storage ©2015 All rights reserved. Regenesis and PersulfOx® are registered trademarks of Regenesis Bioremediation Products. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. PersulfOx Technical Description® Health and Safety Material is relatively safe to handle; however, avoid contact with eyes, skin and clothing. OSHA Level D personal protection equipment including: vinyl or rubber gloves, eye protection, and dust mask are recommended when handling this product. Please review the Material Safety Data Sheet for additional storage, usage, and handling requirements here: PersulfOx SDS. Applications • PersulfOx is mixed with water at a rate of 5% to 20% prior to application. • For most applications, REGENESIS suggests a 10-15% solution. The resulting mixture has viscosity similar to water. • Injects into formation through direct push injection points, injection wells or other injection delivery systems. Application instructions for this product are contained here PersulfOx Application Instructions. Storage Handling Store in original tightly closed container Store in a well-ventilated place Do not store near combustible materials Store away from incompatible materials Recommended to store at less than 40°C Provide appropriate exhaust ventilation in places where dust is formed Avoid mixing with combustibles Avoid contamination Keep away from clothing and other combustible materials Wear appropriate personal protective equipment Avoid breathing dust Avoid contact with eyes, skin, and clothing Avoid prolonged exposure Do not taste or swallow When using, do not eat, drink or smoke Wear appropriate personal protective equipment Wash hands thoroughly after handling Observe good industrial hygiene practices (continued)(continued) Product Sheet remediation@peroxychem.com |1.866.860.4760 | peroxychem.com/remediation Klozur is a Trademark of PeroxyChem. © 2016 PeroxyChem. All rights reserved. Document 02-03-ESD-14 The Field Proven and Versatile ISCO Solution to Address Soil & Groundwater Contamination Klozur® SP is the oxidant of choice for in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO), because of its proven ability to treat a wide range of contaminants including chlorinated solvents, petroleum and PAHs. Based upon an environmental grade of sodium persulfate (SP), Klozur SP is ideal for contaminated source zones and hot spots that require rapid treatment. When properly activated, Klozur SP provides an unmatched combination of oxidative power, versatility, and control that can be delivered both safely and cost effectively. Successful field applications of Klozur activated persulfate have been performed globally. These applications demonstrate the ability of Klozur activated persulfate to treat diverse organic contaminants of concern including: chlorinated ethenes (TCE, PCE, DCE and vinyl chloride), chlorinated ethanes (TCA and DCA), chlorinated methanes (carbon tetrachloride and methylene chloride), BTEX, MTBE, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs, GRO, DRO), 1,4-dioxane and pesticides. The benefits of Klozur SP When used with PeroxyChem’s patented activation methods, Klozur SP produces the powerful oxidative (SO4-•, OH•) and reductive (O2-•) radicals creating a multi-radical attack for the rapid destruction of recalcitrant compounds. Multiple activation options and methods of delivery provide for a flexible and custom solution based on site conditions. With a solubility limit of up to 40 wt%, Klozur SP can be applied as a fully soluble solution. Klozur SP is a stable oxidant given its high oxidation potential, with a typical active lifetime in the subsurface of weeks to months, providing an extended radius of influence. Klozur SP is safe to handle with PeroxyChem’s recommended use guidelines and does not generate heat or gas. The sound science of Klozur Activated Persulfate Klozur activated persulfate has a long history of documented success having been used at thousands of sites to remediate contaminants of concern around the world. The field application of Klozur activated persulfate has been scientifically validated in hundreds of independent peer-reviewed journal articles and conference presentations. Applications methods Direct push injection Fixed well injection Soil blending For more information and detailed case studies, please visit our website. Examples ofContaminants of Concern CHLORINATED SOLVENTSPCE, TCE, DCE, VC, TCA, DCA, methylene chloride, carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene PETROLEUMTPH, BTEX, DRO, GRO PAHs creosote, MGP residuals 1,4-dioxane, MTBE, TBA, energetics, chlorinated pesticides S2O8-2 + Activator → SO4-•, OH•, O2-• Product Sheet remediation@peroxychem.com | 1.866.860.4760 |peroxychem.com/remediation GeoForm™Biogeochemical Reagents are engineered to deliver the building blocks needed to promote in situ biogeochemical reactions. GeoForm™provides a source of sulfate, ferrous iron, electron donors, pH buffer, and nutrients to promote mechanisms for dehalogenation via enhanced anaerobic bioremediation, abiotic degradation, and the formation of reactive minerals. The component ratios have been optimized to maximize the formation of reactive iron sulfide minerals that provide an expanded surface area for abiotic degradation pathways. In addition, the amount of electron donor can be adjusted based on site specific geochemistry. GeoForm™can be used for the treatment of groundwater and saturated soil impacted by persistent halogenated compounds and will also immobilize many heavy metals. Key Benefits •Multiple mechanisms for contaminant degradation •Promotes higher reaction rates •Treats mixed plumes with CVOCs and heavy metals •Improved distribution properties / reactive surface area •Minimal generation of daughter products •Improved longevity •pH balanced GeoForm™Formulations and Applications GeoForm is available in two formulations – a fully soluble formulation for ease of injection and a solid formulation for extended release. GeoForm™Soluble: o Formulated to deliver as a fully soluble dry powder in two parts: o GeoForm™Soluble Mix – a proprietary blend of sulfate and ferrous iron o ELS®Dry Concentrate – a powdered concentrate version of our ELS®Microemulsion organic carbon substrate o Remains fully in solution during mixing and injection o Ideal for plume and hot-spot treatment o Longevity of 2-3 years o Application via injection wells, infiltration networks or direct push GeoForm™Extended Release: o Formulated with a long-lasting source of hydrogen donor and zero valent iron (ZVI) for continued rejuvenation of iron sulfide minerals o Ideal for Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB) and source area treatment o Longevity of 5-10 years o Application via direct push, hydraulic or pneumatic fracturing or soil mixing Product Sheet remediation@peroxychem.com | 1.866.860.4760 |peroxychem.com/remediation GeoForm™Treatment Mechanisms GeoForm™rapidly creates reducing conditions by promoting both biotic and abiotic reduction mechanisms. The organic carbon serves as an electron donor for dechlorinating bacteria;stimulating biological reductive dechlorination. Under sulfate reducing conditions, the creation of reactive iron sulfide minerals will provide an expanded area for abiotic dehalogenation reactions. GeoForm™Extended Release also promotes direct chemical reduction in contact with ZVI. Composition Treatment Mechanisms Biotic Reduction Abiotic Reduction Reductive Minerals ZVI GeoForm™ Soluble Soluble Sulfate and Ferrous Iron Mix added to an Emulsified Organic Carbon Substrate •• GeoForm™Extended Release Extended Release Organic Carbon, Sulfate,Ferrous Iron, Micro-Scale ZVI • • • An Expanded Abiotic Treatment Zone A key attribute of GeoForm™is the creation of an expanded treatment zone for abiotic dehalogenation. While abiotic degradation in contact with ZVI is going to be limited to the ZVI particle surface interface, the reductive mineral zone created by GeoForm™may extend a significant distance downgradient from the placement zone. GeoForm™releases dissolved iron and sulfate which will diffuse in to the surrounding soil matrix and transport with groundwater flow. Once reducing conditions have been established, sulfate reducing bacteria will reduce the sulfate to sulfide which will co-precipitate with ferrous iron and coat the soil with reactive iron sulfide minerals. This increases the surface area for abiotic degradation beyond the area of application and solves an important limitation of traditional ISCR reagents. Furthermore, the iron sulfide zone may be continuously replenished from low levels of organic carbon or hydrogen,thereby acting as an electron shuttle for continued abiotic reduction. The main reaction pathway is via beta-elimination, limiting the generation of daughter products. Particle Size (µm) Surface Area (m2/kg) Micro-Scale ZVI 50-250 ~5-30 Framboidal Pyrite 20 ~10 FeS Coatings 3 ~80 Euhedral Pyrite 1 >200 GeoForm is a trademark of PeroxyChem. ©2018 PeroxyChem. All rights reserved. Document 102-02-ESD-17 Euhedral FeS2 ~1 µm Framboidal FeS2 ~20 µm Electron microprobe analyses performed on iron sulfide precipitation products estimated that 4.1 ft2 of very reactive surface area was generated per liter of groundwater with 3,000 mg/L sulfate reduced to an estimated 3 µm thick FeS precipitate (Leigh et al). Persulfates Technical Information Leading the persulfate market with the highest quality products and reliable supply. Persulfates ┃ 2 Index Applications and Chemistry 04 Applications 05 Oxidation Chemistry / Free Radical Chemistry Persulfate Chemical Structure Physical and Chemical Data 06 Physical and Chemical Properties of Persulfates / Solubilities of Persulfate Salts 07 Density of Aqueous Solutions / Viscosity of Aqueous Solutions 08 Electrical Conductance of Aqueous Solutions / Heat Capacity of Aqueous Solutions 09 Conversion Grams/Liter to Weight Percent 10 Decomposition Rates of 4% Solutions / Decomposition Rates of 10% Solutions 11 Typical Analysis of Persulfates 12 Analytical Chemistry / Assay Procedures General Material Information 13 Handling and Safety / First Aid / Storage / Containers and Packaging 14 Disposal / Shipping / Decomposition Hazard & Prevention Customer Support Services 15 Quality Assurance / Technical Services 16 Contact Information Persulfates ┃ 3 Introduction Persulfates are the most chemically active of the peroxygens, with great utility in a variety of chemical processes. PeroxyChem persulfates, backed by years of experience, are manufactured to strict specifications for thermal stability, making them among the most stable available. PeroxyChem is the leading producer of peroxygen chemicals and a major researcher in active oxidant chemistry. We are the world’s largest and North America’s only producer of peroxydisulfates, a group of chemicals commonly referred to as persulfates. PeroxyChem manufactures ammonium, potassium, and sodium persulfates at a plant in Tonawanda, New York and ammonium and sodium persulfates at a plant in Rheinfelden, Germany. Our dedicated plant employees contribute to PeroxyChem’s 70+ years of peroxygen production experience. PeroxyChem provides a reliable supply of high- quality, stable persulfates to the global market. The Tonawanda plant is an ISO-9002 certified facility near the Niagara River outside Buffalo, NY. The Rheinfelden plant is an ISO-9001, ISO-14001, and ISO-15001certified facility on the Rhine River in Germany. Both locations provide abundant local resources, including reliable supplies of hydroelectric power and cooling water. PeroxyChem has been the world’s leading producer of persulfates for decades, yet we continually find ways to improve our products, especially their safety. Our research into the characteristics of peroxydisulfates has improved the quality and the stability of all PeroxyChem persulfates. An understanding of the crystalline structure of persulfates and the interplay with heat and moisture have changed quality control procedures, manufacturing processes, and storage requirements for these products. We have established new specifications for thermal stability which make persulfates among the most stable available. Persulfates are strong oxidants, have excellent shelf life when stored properly, and are economical to use. These properties make persulfates suitable for a variety of applications. PeroxyChem is committed to the principles of Product Stewardship and to manufacturing, transporting, storing, and using chemicals in a safe manner. The commitment begins with the manufacturing process and continues throughout the life cycle of our products. Our continuing effort is to ensure that safety, health, and environmental issues are addressed wherever persulfates are handled or used. Persulfates ┃ 4 Applications & Chemistry Persulfates are key components in many industrial processes and commercial products. The polymer industry uses aqueous solutions of persulfates as initiators in the polymerization of latex and synthetic rubber. The electronics industry considers sodium persulfate an efficient microetchant in the manufacture of printed circuit boards. The following examples further illustrate the chemical versatility of persulfates. Polymerization PLASTICS AND RUBBER: Ammonium, potassium, and sodium persulfates are used as initiators for emulsion polymerization reactions in the preparation of acrylics, polyvinyl chlorides, polystyrenes, and neoprene. They are used as polymerization initiators in the manufacture of synthetic rubber (styrene butadiene and isoprene) for automobile and truck tires. Persulfate initiation is used to prepare latex polymers for paints, coatings, and carpet backing. STRUCTURAL MATERIALS: Persulfates are used as initiators in polymeric concrete formulations. INORGANIC CHEMICALS AND MINERALS: Persulfates are also initiators for the polymeric coating of graphite filaments. SOIL STABILIZATION: Ammonium persulfate is used as a curing agent in chemical grout systems used to stabilize soil near dams, tunnels, and buildings. Oxidation SURFACE PREPARATION: The oxidation power of persulfates is used to clean and microetch a variety of printed circuit board substrates. Persulfates are important oxidants in plating and coating processes. They are also etchants for nickel, titanium, and zinc alloys. Persulfates are used to clean and mill aluminum, brass, copper, and many other metal surfaces prior to plating or adhesive bonding. Persulfates are used to clean and activate carbon and charcoal before and after their use as absorbents. COSMETICS: The cosmetic industry has developed formulations which use persulfates to boost hair bleaching performance. ORGANIC SYNTHESIS: Persulfates are oxidizing agents in the preparation of aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, quinones, and a variety of other compounds. The pharmaceutical industry uses sodium persulfate as a reagent in the preparation of antibiotics. Other Applications ADHESIVE: Persulfates are used in the preparation of adhesive films and metal bonding adhesives. GAS AND OIL PRODUCTION: In enhanced oil recovery, persulfates are used “down hole” for gel forming and breaking. INKS, PIGMENTS, AND DISPERSANTS: Persulfates are used to graft substrates to polymers (for example, carbon black to sodium acrylate). Persulfates are used in the preparation of dispersants for ink jetting and toner formulations. MINING: Persulfates can be used in nickel and cobalt separation processes. PEROXYMONOSULFATE: PeroxyChem developed a process using ammonium and sodium persulfates to prepare peroxymonosulfate solutions. This patented process allows fast, efficient, on-site production of an alternative to Caro’s acid and potassium caroate. PHOTOGRAPHY: Persulfates are used in many photographic applications, including bleaching solutions, solution regeneration, equipment cleaning, and wastewater treatment. PULP AND PAPER: Persulfates are used in the sizing of paper, preparation of binders and coatings, and production of special papers. An activated alkali metal persulfate effectively repulps neutral/ alkaline wet- strength broke and decolorizes dyes and optical brightener. TEXTILES: Ammonium and sodium persulfates are used in the desizing and bleaching of textiles and the development of dyestuffs. ENVIRONMENTAL: Persulfates are very strong oxidants, have excellent shelf life when stored properly, and are economical to use. These properties make persulfates suitable for a variety of environmental applications, such as soil remediation and wastewater/groundwater cleanup. APPLICATIONS Persulfates ┃ 5 The persulfate anion is the most powerful oxidant of the peroxygen family of compounds. Persulfates produce free radicals in many diverse reaction situations. OXIDATION CHEMISTRY FREE RADICAL CHEMISTRY The electromotive force data listed below compares three commonly used peroxygens: S2O8-2 + 2H+ + 2e- 2HSO4 - E = 2.12V H2O2 + 2H+ + 2e- 2H2O E = 1.77V HSO5- + 2H+ + 2e- HSO4- + H2O E = 1.44V Many metals are oxidized by persulfate to form soluble metal sulfates, for example, copper: Cu + S2O8-2 CuSO4+ SO4-2 Under certain circumstances, hydrolysis of the persulfate anion will yield the bisulfate anion and hydrogen peroxide a kinetically faster oxidant than persulfate: S2O8-2 + 2H2O 2HSO4-2 + H2O2 Another reaction of note is the acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of persulfate to form peroxymonosulfate anion. Fast, high-temperature, acid hydrolysis followed by thermal quenching will yield solutions of peroxymonosulfate: S2O8-2 + H2O HSO4- + HSO5 The resulting solution is a useful replacement for Caro’s acid, H2SO5 and potassium caroate, KHSO5. Reactions at different pH: NEUTRAL (PH 3 TO 7) S2O8-2 + H2O 2HSO4- + 1/202 DILUTE ACID (PH > 0.3; [H+] < 0.5M) S2O8-2 + 2H2O 2HSO4- + H2O2 STRONG ACID ([H+] > 0.5M) S2O8-2 + H2O 2HSO4- + HSO5- ALKALINE (PH > 13) S2O8-2 + OH- HSO4- + SO4-2 + 1/202 H+ When solutions of the persulfates are heated, free radicals are formed: S2O8-2 + Heat 2SO4•- In the presence of suitable monomers, the radical anions act as polymerization initiators to produce polymer molecules: SO4•- + nCH2 = CH -O3SO(CH2(CH2(CH)n-1(CH2C•H) Free radicals suitable as polymerization initiators are also generated in the presence of reducing agents, for example, the bisulfite anion: S2O8-2 + HSO3- + 1/202 HSO4- + 2SO4•- Free radicals can also be generated in the presence of transition metals: S2O8-2 + Fe+2 Fe+3 + SO4-2 + SO4•- and mercaptans: S2O8-2 + 2RSH 2HSO4- + 2RS• R R R Persulfate Chemical Structure Persulfates ┃ 6 Physical & Chemical Data You will find the data useful for applying persulfate chemicals to various processes and products. The density, viscosity, electrical conductance, and solution heat capacity data are presented in graphic and equation form. This format enables you to view the general trend of the physical data. Then, with the aid of equations, you can calculate the correct values for your application. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF PERSULFATES Solubility (g/100g of H2O) Ammonium Persulfate Potassium Persulfate Sodium Persulfate 25° C 85 6 73 50° C 116 17 86 Common Name Ammonium Persulfate Potassium Persulfate Sodium Persulfate Chemical Name Ammonium Peroxydisulfate Potassium Peroxydisulfate Sodium Peroxydisulfate Physical Form Crystalline (monoclinic) Crystalline (triclinic) Crystalline (monoclinic) Formula (NH4)2S2O8 K2S2O8 Na2S2O8 Molecular Weight 228.2 270.3 238.1 Crystal Density (g/cc)1.98 2.48 2.59 Color Off-white Off-white White Odor None None None Loose Bulk Density (g/cc)1.05 1.30 1.12 Maximum solubility of Persulfate salts in water PeroxyChem conducted physical and chemical studies of persulfates to provide the data for this section. Persulfates ┃ 7 25° C 35° C 45° C Viscosity of H2O 0.8904 0.7194 0.5960 Salt Constant 25° C 35° C 45° C Ammonium C D E -1.0686x10-3 1.7140x10-4 2.4670x10-5 6.8050x10-3 -9.4542x10-4 5.9785x10-5 5.3134x10-3 -5.8450x10-4 4.5080x10-5 Potassium C D E 0 1.0661x10-3 9.8884x10-5 5.9187x10-3 -1.0551x10-3 1.0674x10-4 3.5413x10-3 -9.5623x10-5 1.2477x10-5 Sodium C D E 4.3857x10-3 -1.2218x10-3 1.5146x10-4 6.1743x10-3 -4.6619x10-4 8.1093x10-5 1.3461x10-2 -1.9741x10-3 1.3540x10-4 Salt Constant 25° C 35° C 45° C Ammonium A B 0.4903 -2.6730x10-4 0.4860 -7.6254x10-4 0.4789 -5.0971x10-4 Potassium A B 0.6368 -1.4934x10-3 0.6273 -8.1965x10-4 0.6294 -1.6472x10-3 Sodium A B 0.6709 -1.4934x10-3 0.6727 -1.4909x10-3 0.6610 -1.0038x10-3 DENSITY OF WATER 25° C 35° C 45° C Density H2O 0.99707 0.99406 0.99025 EQUATION FOR CALCULATION OF DENSITY Density (g/mL) = density H2O + (A/1000)X + (B/1000)X1.5, where X = solution concentration in grams per liter (g/L). EQUATION FOR CALCULATION OF VISCOSITY Viscosity (cp) = viscosity H2O + CX0.5 + DX + EX1.5, where X = solution concentration in grams per liter (g/L). VISCOSITY OF WATER Persulfates ┃ 8 Salt Constant 25° C Ammonium K L M 0.994 -1.863x10-3 4.531x10-5 Potassium K L M 0.997 1.150x10-3 2.670x10-5 Sodium K L M 0.997 1.190x10-3 3.112x10-5 Salt Constant 25° C 35° C 45° C Ammonium F G H 3.9016 0.8568 6.2904x10-4 6.6081 0.9804 -7.1312x10-4 6.2538 1.1578 -8.8912x10-4 Potassium F G H 2.9603 0.6704 -1.0456x10-3 3.7314 0.7972 -1.1982x10-3 4.1673 0.9525 -1.9173x10-3 Sodium F G H 5.9501 0.5880 -6.6193x10-4 7.1826 0.6967 -7.5821x10-4 8.1825 0.8123 -8.6226x10-4 EQUATION FOR CALCULATION OF ELECTRICAL CONDUCTANCE Conductance (mmho/cm) = F + GX + HX2, where X = solution concentration in grams per liter (g/L). EQUATION FOR CALCULATION OF HEAT CAPACITY Heat capacity (cal/g °C) = K - LX + MX1.5, where X = solution concentration in grams per liter (g/L). Conversion cal/g °C = Btu/lb °F = J/g °C 4.184 Persulfates ┃ 9 G/L 25° C 35° C 45° C 25° C 35° C 45° C 25° C 35° C 45° C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 2.477 2.485 2.495 2.468 2.476 2.486 2.466 2.474 2.484 50 4.895 4.911 4.931 4.861 4.877 4.896 4.854 4.868 4.888 75 7.256 7.281 7.311 7.183 7.208 7.237 7.167 7.187 7.219 100 9.562 9.598 9.635 —9.470 9.510 9.410 9.435 9.479 125 11.815 11.863 11.912 —11.668 11.719 11.586 11.616 11.672 150 14.017 14.077 14.136 ——13.868 13.699 13.733 13.801 175 16.170 16.244 16.311 ——15.959 15.751 15.790 15.870 200 18.275 18.364 18.440 ——17.994 17.745 17.788 17.880 250 22.349 22.471 22.564 ———21.572 21.620 21.738 300 26.251 26.411 26.519 ———25.197 25.250 25.394 350 29.993 30.194 30.316 ———28.634 28.695 28.864 400 33.583 33.831 33.964 ———31.910 31.969 32.164 450 37.031 37.329 37.473 ———35.026 35.087 35.307 500 40.346 40.699 40.850 ———37.998 38.060 38.305 550 43.536 43.946 44.104 ———40.836 40.898 41.168 600 46.607 47.079 47.241 ———43.551 43.613 43.905 650 49.566 50.103 50.268 ———46.150 46.211 46.527 700 52.420 53.025 53.191 ———48.642 48.702 49.040 Note: Potassium persulfate is the least soluble of PeroxyChem’s persulfate salts Persulfates ┃ 10 Persulfates ┃ 11 Analysis Ammonium persulfate Potassium persulfate Sodium persulfate Purity (%)99.5 99.5 99.4 Active oxygen (%)6.98 5.90 6.68 Moisture (%)0.02 0.02 0.01 Ammonium persulfate (%)—0.14 0.01 Sodium sulfate (%)——0.70 pH (1% solution)5.2 6.4 6.0 Iron (ppm)1 3 2 Insolubles (ppm)21 18 29 Copper (ppm)<0.3 <0.2 <0.2 Chloride (ppm)<10 <10 <10 Heavy metals, as lead (ppm)<1 <1 <1 Manganese (ppm)<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Chromium (ppm)<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Sodium (ppm)20 —— Potassium (ppm)50 —— TYPICAL ANALYSIS OF PERSULFATES Persulfates ┃ 12 Solids To a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, add about 1 gram of sample weighed to the nearest milligram and about 50 mL of 1N H2SO4. Dissolve the sample and add exactly 40 mL of 0.5 N ferrous ammonium sulfate solution. Swirl constantly while adding the ferrous ammonium sulfate solution. Let this stand for one minute and titrate with 0.5 N KMnO4 to permanent pink endpoint or with 0.5 N Ce(SO4)2 to a Ferroin indicator endpoint. The calculations require a blank titration on exactly 40 mL of ferrous ammonium sulfate solution, as used above, in 50 mL of the 1 N H2SO4. % active oxygen = (A - B)C x 0.8 D % ammonium persulfate = (A - B)C x 11.4 D % potassium persulfate = (A - B)C x 13.5 D % sodium persulfate = (A - B)C x 11.9 D A = mL KMnO4 or Ce(SO4)2 solution used for titrating the blank. B = mL KMnO4 or Ce(SO4)2 solution used for titrating the sample. C = Normality of the KMnO4 or Ce(SO4)2 solution used. D = Weight of sample in grams. Solutions To a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, pipette 2-20 mL of persulfate solution (depending on the approximate solution concentration). Add about 50 mL of about 1 N H2SO4 solution. Add exactly 40 mL of 0.5 N ferrous ammonium sulfate solution. Swirl constantly while adding the ferrous ammonium sulfate solution. Let stand for one minute and titrate with 0.5 N KMnO4 to a permanent pink endpoint or with 0.5 N Ce(SO4)2 to a Ferroin indicator endpoint. The calculations require a blank titration on exactly 40 mL of ferrous ammonium sulfate solution, as used above, in 50 mL of the 1 N H2SO4. g/L active oxygen = (A - B)C x 8 D g/L ammonium persulfate = (A - B)C x 114 D g/L potassium persulfate = (A - B)C x 135 D g/L sodium persulfate = (A - B)C x 119 D A = mL KMnO4 or Ce(SO4)2 solution used for titrating the blank. B = mL KMnO4 or Ce(SO4)2 solution used for titrating the sample. C = Normality of the KMnO4 or Ce(SO4)2 solution used. D = Volume of sample in milliliters. ASSAY PROCEDURES ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Persulfates or their solutions can be conveniently assayed by the methods described below. In each method, persulfate is determined by titration of a standardized potassium permanganate or ceric ammonium sulfate solution with a standardized ferrous ammonium sulfate solution, a backtitration technique. Reagents can be purchased prestandardized or prepared from commercially available chemicals. All reagents, chemicals, and apparatus used are common, off-the-shelf items, and can be purchased from commercial supply houses. Persulfates ┃ 13 General Material Information Persulfate Handling and Safety Persulfates are oxidizing chemicals that require careful attention to all aspects of handling and use. For more information, you may request a Safety Data Sheet (SDS) which is available from any PeroxyChem office and on our website at peroxychem.com. Personal Protective Equipment When handling persulfate chemicals, follow the guidelines listed here and in the SDS. PROTECT YOUR EYES: Wear chemical-type goggles or a face mask whenever splashing, spraying, or any eye contact is possible. PROTECT YOUR RESPIRATORY SYSTEM: Use dust respirators approved by NIOSH/MSA whenever exposure may exceed the established standard listed in the current SDS. PROTECT YOUR HANDS: Wear general purpose neoprene gloves. PROTECT YOURSELF WITH PROPER CLOTHING: Wear ordinary work clothes with long sleeves and full-length pants. PROTECT YOURSELF WITH PROPER FOOTWEAR: Wear shoes with neoprene soles. First Aid EYE CONTACT: Flush with water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation occurs and persists, obtain medical attention. SKIN CONTACT: Wash with plenty of soap and water. If irritation occurs and persists, obtain medical attention. Wash clothing before reuse. INHALATION: Get fresh air. If breathing difficulty or discomfort occurs, call a physician. INGESTION: Drink one to two glasses of water. Do not induce vomiting. Do not give anything by mouth to an unconscious individual. Call a physician immediately. When properly handled and stored, persulfates and their solutions do not present serious health hazards. The SDS provides information concerning exposure, emergency, first aid, and disposal of persulfates. Storage Persulfates should be stored in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 400 Hazardous Materials Code. PeroxyChem personnel can provide additional support in reviewing storage facilities. GENERAL PRECAUTIONS: Persulfates should be kept in a cool, dry storage area, in a configuration that is appropriate for the sprinkler capacity of the building per NFPA 400. Personnel should be trained to handle persulfates safely, properly dispose of spilled materials and prevent contamination. If material gets wet or spills, it must be isolated and disposed of properly. Containers and Packaging PeroxyChem packages and ships crystalline persulfate chemicals in three different container types, according to customer requests. Type Construction Persulfate wt/container Containers per pallet Persulfate wt/pallet Bag Polyethylene 55 lbs/25kg 40 2,200 lbs/1,000kg Drum Fiber drums, polyethylene liner 225 lbs/102kg 8 1,800 lbs/896kg IBC*Polypropylene sack 2,200 lbs/1,000kg 1 2,200 lbs/1,000kg *IBC = Intermediate Bulk Container, equipped with easy opening bottom spout for discharging into tanks or hoppers. Persulfates ┃ 14 HANDLING: To remove and transport persulfates from the shipping containers, use clean plastic or stainless steel scoops, shovels, pails, etc. Cleanliness is essential. SOLUTION STORAGE: Aqueous solutions of ammonium persulfate are more susceptible to decomposition than the solid product. The recommended materials of construction for storage and conveyance equipment (tanks, pipelines, etc.) are 304 and 316 stainless steel. Other acceptable materials include polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene, Plexiglas® plastic (or other suitable generic), Teflon® resin (or other suitable generic), chemical stoneware, and glass. Metals other than 304 and 316 stainless steel cause decomposition of the persulfate solutions or may be corroded by them. This is particularly true of Monel, copper, brass, and iron. Do not store or process persulfate solutions in sealed or closed containers or vessels. Normal solution decomposition will release oxygen gas which may overpressurize a sealed container and cause rupture. Storage of persulfate solutions above 25°C will accelerate the rate of decomposition. See data on decomposition hazard and decomposition prevention. Disposal Persulfate crystals should never be discarded to trash bins. Contact with moisture, contaminants, and/or reducing agents can initiate a chemical reaction or a persulfate decomposition. Persulfate crystals which become a waste material are classified as hazardous waste because they are oxidizers. Persulfates that are spilled on the floor, or otherwise contaminated, are best dissolved in copious quantities of water. An acceptable disposal method for spent persulfate solutions is to dilute with large quantities of water and dispose via a treatment system. Any disposal method must be in full accordance with all local, state and federal regulations. Shipping U.S. and international transportation regulations classify persulfates as OXIDIZERS and regulates their transport by air, water, and rail. These regulations detail the specific requirements for packaging, marking, labeling and describing persulfates for shipment. Decomposition Hazard Overheating or contamination of persulfates can lead to a runaway decomposition. The persulfate salt will begin to effervesce with an acid-like odor. Persulfates decompose to form solid sulfate salts and emit noxious fog or fumes of SOx and NOx. This decomposition may form a high temperature melt. The material will flow like magma and may ignite nearby combustible materials such as wood or paper. Oxygen produced by persulfate decomposition can increase the intensity of the fire. The only way to halt a decomposition event is to apply LARGE quantities of water to the reacting material. Eight pounds of water per pound of decomposing materials is recommended, but no less than two pounds of water should be applied. Insufficient amounts of water will intensify the reaction and increase the acid mist concentration. Please note that carbon dioxide (CO2) or other gas-filled extinguishers will have NO effect on decomposing persulfate. The use of water as an extinguishing agent is emphasized. Control of the melt and firefighting efforts are enhanced if persulfates are stored within containment areas. Persulfate decomposition will require emergency responders wearing full protective rubber clothing, face and head protection, plus self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA). Decomposition Prevention OBSERVE THE FOLLOWING PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT DECOMPOSITION: Do not expose persulfates or their containers to moisture. Moisture significantly lowers the decomposition temperature. Do not store persulfates near incompatible materials such as reducing agents, acids, bases, halide salt solutions, organics, ammoniacal solutions, alkaline cleansers, or other oxidizers. These materials can initiate decomposition. Do not store near point sources of heat such as steam pipes, electrical appliances, heating vents, gas flames, welding sparks, or radiant heaters. Do not store at ambient temperatures above 113°F or 45°C. Do not return spilled or unused portions of persulfates to the original container. Dirt, metal, moisture, or other contaminants can induce the decomposition of persulfates. Do not cross-contaminate with scoops, cups, or stirrers that may have been exposed to or used with other chemicals. Use only dedicated clean, dry plastic or stainless steel scoops and utensils for transfer. Do not grind or dry mix in equipment or machines that develop frictional heat. Persulfates ┃ 15 Quality Assurance PeroxyChem persulfate products are produced under an ISO-9002 certified quality system. Statistical Process Control (SPC) and a distributed control system combine to provide consistent process control. PeroxyChem operators monitor key parameters to ensure consistent quality for all products. All materials–raw, intermediate and final–are checked and tested in a new, modern laboratory employing the latest analytical technology. Quality test results are maintained on each batch of product. Certificates of Analysis and other end-product information can be customized to meet your system requirements. Our production facility uses SPC methods to improve and assure the quality of persulfate chemical products. PeroxyChem operators chart key operating parameters to maintain process control; this assures that quality is built in to each customer’s order. The SPC system is designed to meet your specific quality standards. Product is analyzed and identified as it leaves the packaging areas. Product quality is maintained by batch number. The information is then stored in a computer database, enabling PeroxyChem to issue Certificates of Analysis that are specific to each batch of materials received by our customers. PeroxyChem is the only persulfate producer that uses cutting edge technology to ensure that our products are stable for storage or transport and use. We have established new product safety standards for thermal stability to ensure a high-quality, stable persulfate. Technical Services All PeroxyChem customers have access to our staff of technical service representatives. These chemists and engineers are experienced in the production, sale, and distribution of peroxygen chemicals. They are fully capable of answering questions on the safe handling and usage of persulfates. In fact, PeroxyChem specialists have helped our customers pioneer many successful applications for persulfate chemicals. Our engineering services include the design and construction of storage facilities, or the safety inspection of your present warehouse or production facilities. PeroxyChem also offers a complete list of technical articles, bulletins, data sheets, and patents. Customer Support Services Persulfates ┃ 16 Contact Information For more information, please contact us at: PeroxyChem Global Headquarters One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street Suite 3200 Philadelphia, PA 19103 United States Ph +1 267 422 2400 European Persulfates RheinPerChemie GmbH Kattrepel 2 20095 Hamburg Germany Ph +49 40 32 50 95-0 Email sales@RheinPerChemie.com PeroxyChem Philippines 10/F, Net Lima 5th Ave. Cor. 26th St. Bonifacio Global City Taguig, Metro Manila 1634 Philippines Ph +63 2 669 2759 PeroxyChem Mexico Avenida Industrias No. 9 Col. Industrial Cerro Gordo Ecatepec de Morelos 55420 Ph +52 5 776-3933 3433 4050 PeroxyChem Brasil Rua Alvorada 1289 - Sala 310 VIla Olimpia, São Paulo/SP - Brasil CEP 04550-004 Ph +55 11 3280 1610 DRAFT EXECUTIVE SCOUR REPORT PREPARED FOR OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT ALONG OXOBOXO BROOK 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2018 PREPARED BY: BRANDON HANDFIELD, PE YANTIC RIVER CONSULTANTS, LLC 191 NORWICH AVE LEBANON, CT 06249 OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT TOC TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 EVALUATION BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 3 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 3 GROUT FILLED BAGS .................................................................................................................. 4 PILE INSTALLATION .................................................................................................................... 4 MONITORING ................................................................................................................................. 4 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 5 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX B: WASHED SIEVE ANALYSIS APPENDIX C: HEC-RAS OUTPUT (cross sections, flow distribution tables, detailed output tables) APPENDIX D: SCOUR COMPUTATIONS APPENDIX E: COUNTERMEASURE DETAILS TABLES TABLE 1: POTENTIAL SCOUR DEPTHS .............................................................................................. 3 OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dakota Partners, Inc. is proposing an adaptive reuse and historic conversion of a former cotton and textile mill at 42 Pink Row in Uncasville, CT to create the Oxoboxo Lofts. The redevelopment of the 10.64-acre parcel will include construction of 73 multi-family units and associated site improvements including parking, walkways and residential amenities. Oxoboxo Brook travels through the historic mill prior to its confluence with Horton Cove & the Thames River. Oxoboxo Brook and a portion of the mill lie within a regulated FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AE as depicted on FEMA FIRM Panel 09011C0361J. As such, the project is subject to Floodplain Management Certification through the Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection (CTDEEP). During the permitting process, CTDEEP identified that the existing brook shows signs of scour and portions of some buildings are being undermined. To address the noted scour, foundation reinforcement and countermeasure design is required at the northern embankment along Building J. In response to CTDEEP’s requirement, Yantic River Consultants, LLC (YRC) was subcontracted to perform a scour evaluation of Oxoboxo Brook along the southeast foundation of Building J. YRC visited the site in November 2018 to evaluate the stream in accordance with FHWA Hydraulic Engineering Circular (HEC)-20, obtain a streambed sample, and observe current conditions along the buildings. In general, a stable channel with potential for armoring was witnessed with localized undermining up to 18” deep along the southeast limit of Building J. 2016 STATEWIDE AERIAL, UCONN. BUILDING LABELS PER FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DATED 10/21/18 PREPARED BY BSC GROUP AND PAUL B. BAILEY ARCHITECT, LLC Long-term degradation and contraction and local scour were evaluated in accordance with HEC-18. The site conditions and flow distribution velocities were considered for long-term degradation. Potential scour depths were computed at the arch between Building J and M and at Bridge No. 03966 (Pink Row) to determine the impact of the restrictions on Oxoboxo Brook and Building J. Hydraulic data, results, and reports obtained from BSC Group were referenced by YRC in the scour evaluation. It is our understanding that the hydraulic information and reports, including HEC-RAS J I K G F E D C A B M L ARCH BRIDGE NO. 03966 OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT 2 models, were submitted to CTDEEP as part of the Flood Management Certification permit resubmission package dated October 2017. If any revisions to the model are required as part of the permitting process, a revised scour analysis will be required. Potential scour depths, computed velocities and site conditions were used to identify design parameters and countermeasures in accordance with HEC-23. The following are recommendations to mitigate and limit future undermining at Building J: 1. Placement of grout filled bags for foundation underpinning within the existing scour hole(s); 2. Installation of piles to provide foundation reinforcement; 3. Routine & flood event monitoring of the channel along Building J and outfall immediately downstream of Building J to identify any areas of further undermining. OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT 3 EVALUATION BACKGROUND Oxoboxo Brook within the project area is generally stable with potential for armoring. Localized undermining up to 18” deep was witnessed along the southeast limit of Building J due to an apparent loss of fine materials, while larger stones and cobbles remain intact. The undermining appears to be the result of long-term degradation as contraction and flow obstructions in the vicinity are limited. A streambed sample was obtained by YRC and delivered to Materials Testing, Inc. for a washed sieve analysis and determination of the streambed D50. A D50 of 2.2mm was determined, which is representative of a coarse sand. The grain sizes in the sample ranged from fine sand to cobbles, consistent with witnessed field conditions. A copy of the analysis is provided in Appendix B. Variables in the analysis were obtained from a HEC-RAS model of Oxoboxo Brook prepared by BSC Group; specifically, the proposed plan and 100-year and 500-year water surface profiles. No modifications to the original HEC-RAS model were made. Selective output from the model used in the analysis is provided in Appendix C. Oxoboxo Brook has experienced 50-year flood events in 1978 and 1979 and 100-year flood events in 1982 and 1992 as recorded in the CTDOT Comparative Scour Analysis of Bridge No. 03966 dated 12/08/98. No significant scour was recorded during these events. Routine inspections have observed maximum scour depths up to 1.5-feet. As such, it is recommended to design countermeasures for the 100-year design storm given the reach’s scour history, stability, and armoring potential. RECOMMENDATIONS Contraction and local scour were considered at the arch structure immediately upstream of Building J and at Bridge No. 03966 (Pink Row) immediately downstream. Computations are provided in Appendix D. Total scour depths at the northern embankments (left) are as follows: STORM EVENT ARCH BRIDGE NO. 03966 100-YEAR 4.40 4.69 500-YEAR (CHECK) 2.80 12.60 TABLE 1: POTENTIAL SCOUR DEPTHS The computed 100-year scour depths at both structures are low in magnitude. This is consistent with witnessed field conditions of limited contraction and obstruction of the channelized reach of Oxoboxo Brook through the mill. This supports the undermining along Building J is the result of long-term degradation and the angle of attack. For the 500-year storm, the arch has a reduced scour depth value as split flow occurs and 2/3± of the flow passes south of the mill in the right overbank. Bridge No. 03966 has an increase due to an apparent pressure flow condition resulting from the Pink Row embankment. These values are provided as a check only. The following countermeasures are recommended to address foundation undermining: OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT 4 GROUT FILLED BAGS Grout filled bags are recommended to address the undermining. As noted in HEC-23, grout bags provide and efficient and cost-effective means of underpinning foundations. They are also adaptable to variations in streambed and voids under the structure and allow for installation without significant dewatering. Prior to installation, a survey along the length of Building J should be completed to determine the full depth and extent of undermining to allow for design of the bag placement. Bags should be positioned to tightly abut each other, pumped uniformly, and joints between successive tiers staggered, if required. Bag sizing will be dependent on manufacturer and void requirements; typical fill thickness ranges from 6” to 18” with widths of 3’ to 4’. Placement may require modification of the streambed or removal of obstacles, such as cobbles or large stones, to allow for uniform placement. Any cavity remaining behind the bags should be filled with grout in accordance with HEC-23 and the Maryland State Highway Administration guidelines. A detail is provided in Appendix E. Velocities in the area of undermining have a magnitude of 6 to 10 ft/s. Prior to installation, the contractor shall submit manufacturer technical specifications or design to confirm the bags will withstand computed velocities. Riprap was considered although not recommended due to access limitations, requirement for hand placement, and potential for fines to be washed away. PILE INSTALLATION For structural reinforcement of the building, we understand that piles will be installed along the southern face of Building J. Piles must be designed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Connecticut in coordination with the architect. It is recommended the piles be designed to accommodate calculated 100-year scour depths and existing subchannel soil conditions. Borings are recommended to determine soil conditions in the area of proposed piles. Based on the Foundation Support Adjacent Block detail prepared by BSC Group on Sheet C-6.2 of the Oxoboxo Lofts Final Construction Documents dated July 13, 2018 and provided in Appendix E, brackets will be used to attach piles to building. It is anticipated this work will need to be completed during low flow conditions or will require the installation of temporary cofferdams to allow work to be performed in the dry. The design of the piles and grout filled bags must be coordinated to ensure the installation plans are compatible and the finished countermeasure will provide a tight system to prevent the migration of water under the building. MONITORING Routine and flood event monitoring of the channel along Building J is recommended following installation of the grout filled bags and piles. If continued undermining is noted, additional placement of grout filled bags or the addition of riprap along the limit of the bags may be warranted. OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT 5 An existing paved swale along the eastern limit of Building J discharges at the downstream limit of undermining. The swale will be removed as part of the redevelopment and a new headwall with an 18” outlet is proposed. Monitoring of this outfall is recommended to ensure the structural integrity of the headwall and standard riprap splash pad are not compromised. This is critical as failure would result in undermining of embankment immediate downstream of the revetment and introduction of velocities and water from the stormwater drainage system behind the installed revetment. CONCLUSION Based on witnessed field conditions, Building J is subject to undermining along Oxoboxo Brook due to long-term degradation and ordinary water surface elevations at the building. Potential scour depths, computed velocities, and site conditions were used to identify design parameters and countermeasures. Immediate countermeasures are recommended as part of the redevelopment of the existing historic mill including installation of grout filled bags, cavity grouting and installation of piles for building reinforcement. Future countermeasures may be required if additional undermining is noted under routine and flood monitoring. OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHS OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT PHOTOGRAPHS: Looking upstream (west) from Pink Row towards arch structure. Building J to right (north) Building J from south embankment; note discharge swale along southeast building corner Building J along Oxoboxo Brook in area of undermining Building J along Oxoboxo Brook in area of undermining (date unknown, assumed summer) NOTE: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN NOV. 2018 OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT PHOTOGRAPHS: Building J along Oxoboxo Brook in area of undermining Apparent undermining along Building J (18” max. observed depth) Foundation crack and undermining below Building J Building J at southeast corner; shovel provided for reference of channel depth NOTE: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN NOV. 2018 OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT PHOTOGRAPHS: Google Street View – Sep. 2013 from Pink Row (Bridge No. 03966) looking upstream (west) towards arch and Building J to the right (north) 2016 Statewide Aerial (Montville GIS) – General Site Location AREA OF EVALUATION OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT APPENDIX B WASHED SIEVE ANALYSIS MATERIALS TESTING, INC. 55 LAURA STREET • NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06512 • (203) 468-5216 42 BOSTON POST ROAD • WILLIMANTIC, CONNECTICUT 06226 • (860) 423-1972 DATE: 11-27-18 REPORT: M-1008 CLIENT: Yantic River Consultants, LLC 191 Norwich Avenue Lebanon, CT 06249 Attn: Mr. Brandon Handfield, PE PROJECT:Client’s Information SUBJECT: WASHED SIEVE ANALYSIS (ASTM C-136, D-1140) Material:Oxoboxo D50 Streambed Material Source:Oxoboxo Brook along existing foundation Sampled:by client and delivered to Materials Testing, Inc. on 11/20/18 Sieve Size Percent Passing 1 ½” (37.5mm) 100 1" (25mm) 90 ¾” (19mm) 77 ½” (12.5mm) 69 d” (9.5mm) 66 ¼” (6.3mm) 61 #10 (2.0mm) 49 #20 (850µm) 34 #40 (425µm) 17 #100 (150µm) 6 #200 (75µm) 4.1 D50 = 2.2mm A material specification was not provided at this time. Materials Testing, Inc. Bryan R. Kearns (1) Attachment: Grain Size Chart (1) Attachment: Chain of Custody William J. Soucy File: Original 1cc: Client brk. Test reports may not be reproduced without the express permission of Materials Testing, Inc. Results only relate to items tested. OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT APPENDIX C HEC-RAS OUTPUT (CROSS SECTIONS, FLOW DISTRIBUTION TABLES, DETAILED OUTPUT TABLES) 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 0 ft/s 1 ft/s 2 ft/s 3 ft/s 4 ft/s 5 ft/s 6 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s 12 ft/s 14 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s 12 ft/s 14 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 40010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s 12 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Section C Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50015 20 25 30 35 40 45 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s 12 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .1 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50015 20 25 30 35 40 45 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s 12 ft/s 14 ft/s 16 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .1 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 500 60015 20 25 30 35 40 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 100 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s Ground Bank Sta .05 .03 .05 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 0 ft/s 1 ft/s 2 ft/s 3 ft/s 4 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 0 ft/s 1 ft/s 2 ft/s 3 ft/s 4 ft/s 5 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 1 ft/s 2 ft/s 3 ft/s 4 ft/s 5 ft/s 6 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 0 ft/s 5 ft/s 10 ft/s 15 ft/s 20 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 40010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50010 20 30 40 50 60 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Section C Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 0 ft/s 1 ft/s 2 ft/s 3 ft/s 4 ft/s 5 ft/s 6 ft/s 7 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .03 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50015 20 25 30 35 40 45 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 0 ft/s 1 ft/s 2 ft/s 3 ft/s 4 ft/s 5 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .1 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 50015 20 25 30 35 40 45 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s 12 ft/s 14 ft/s 16 ft/s 18 ft/s Ground Ineff Bank Sta .1 .04 .03 0 100 200 300 400 500 60015 20 25 30 35 40 OXOBOXO BROOK Plan: Proposed Flow 12/12/2018 Station (ft)Elevation (ft)Legend WS 500 year 0 ft/s 2 ft/s 4 ft/s 6 ft/s 8 ft/s 10 ft/s 12 ft/s 14 ft/s Ground Bank Sta .05 .03 .05 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 Profile: 100 year E.G. US. (ft) 25.30 Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS W.S. US. (ft) 24.65 E.G. Elev (ft) 25.07 24.89 Q Total (cfs) 1700.00 W.S. Elev (ft) 23.70 23.36 Q Bridge (cfs) 1700.00 Crit W.S. (ft) 21.76 21.88 Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft) 6.30 5.86 Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 9.40 9.93 Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) 180.79 171.25 Weir Submerg Froude # Chl 0.66 0.72 Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft) 1091.79 1042.53 Min El Weir Flow (ft) 25.01 Hydr Depth (ft) 14.46 10.19 Min El Prs (ft) 24.06 W.P. Total (ft) 66.76 59.96 Delta EG (ft) 0.72 Conv. Total (cfs) 13047.7 12805.5 Delta WS (ft) 1.01 Top Width (ft) 12.50 16.81 BR Open Area (sq ft) 179.41 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.14 0.01 BR Open Vel (ft/s) 9.93 C & E Loss (ft) 0.05 0.29 BR Sluice Coef Shear Total (lb/sq ft) 2.87 3.14 BR Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s) 26.99 31.19 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 Profile: 500 year E.G. US. (ft) 29.10 Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS W.S. US. (ft) 28.92 E.G. Elev (ft) 29.00 28.10 Q Total (cfs) 2600.00 W.S. Elev (ft) 28.47 24.84 Q Bridge (cfs) 732.49 Crit W.S. (ft) 22.86 22.98 Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft) 11.07 7.34 Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 5.38 14.49 Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) 483.60 179.41 Weir Submerg Froude # Chl 0.31 0.94 Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft) 2422.41 1952.69 Min El Weir Flow (ft) 25.01 Hydr Depth (ft) 4.22 Min El Prs (ft) 24.06 W.P. Total (ft) 200.44 76.86 Delta EG (ft) 2.25 Conv. Total (cfs) 42483.9 11727.4 Delta WS (ft) 2.85 Top Width (ft) 114.55 BR Open Area (sq ft) 179.41 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.07 0.01 BR Open Vel (ft/s) 4.08 C & E Loss (ft) 0.82 1.24 BR Sluice Coef Shear Total (lb/sq ft) 0.56 7.16 BR Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s) 3.03 103.80 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 Profile: 100 year E.G. US. (ft) 23.41 Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS W.S. US. (ft) 22.14 E.G. Elev (ft) 23.08 22.23 Q Total (cfs) 1700.00 W.S. Elev (ft) 20.76 21.09 Q Bridge (cfs) 1700.00 Crit W.S. (ft) 20.76 19.50 Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft) 5.46 6.09 Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 12.23 8.53 Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) 139.00 199.20 Weir Submerg Froude # Chl 0.92 0.61 Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft) 970.71 1035.24 Min El Weir Flow (ft) 24.01 Hydr Depth (ft) 4.64 6.64 Min El Prs (ft) 22.90 W.P. Total (ft) 38.72 51.86 Delta EG (ft) 1.44 Conv. Total (cfs) 12105.2 24200.5 Delta WS (ft) 0.80 Top Width (ft) 29.94 29.99 BR Open Area (sq ft) 197.78 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.19 0.00 BR Open Vel (ft/s) 12.23 C & E Loss (ft) 0.60 0.25 BR Sluice Coef Shear Total (lb/sq ft) 4.42 1.18 BR Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s) 54.06 10.10 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 Profile: 500 year E.G. US. (ft) 26.37 Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS W.S. US. (ft) 26.16 E.G. Elev (ft) 25.43 24.27 Q Total (cfs) 2600.00 W.S. Elev (ft) 22.10 22.35 Q Bridge (cfs) 2600.00 Crit W.S. (ft) 22.10 20.71 Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft) 6.80 7.35 Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 14.65 11.09 Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) 177.52 234.39 Weir Submerg Froude # Chl 0.99 0.72 Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft) 1721.40 1754.70 Min El Weir Flow (ft) 24.01 Hydr Depth (ft) 6.66 9.08 Min El Prs (ft) 22.90 W.P. Total (ft) 43.48 56.74 Delta EG (ft) 2.69 Conv. Total (cfs) 16844.8 29888.2 Delta WS (ft) 3.24 Top Width (ft) 26.65 25.81 BR Open Area (sq ft) 197.78 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.27 0.00 BR Open Vel (ft/s) 14.65 C & E Loss (ft) 0.71 0.58 BR Sluice Coef Shear Total (lb/sq ft) 6.07 1.95 BR Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s) 88.93 21.65 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1869 Profile: 100 year E.G. Elev (ft) 25.54 Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.34 Wt. n-Val. 0.030 0.040 0.030 W.S. Elev (ft) 25.20 Reach Len. (ft) 65.00 65.00 65.00 Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) 8.92 298.50 81.35 E.G. Slope (ft/ft) 0.001689 Area (sq ft) 8.92 298.50 131.65 Q Total (cfs) 1700.00 Flow (cfs) 21.25 1476.58 202.16 Top Width (ft) 169.75 Top Width (ft) 5.27 49.53 114.95 Vel Total (ft/s) 4.37 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) 2.38 4.95 2.49 Max Chl Dpth (ft) 7.49 Hydr. Depth (ft) 1.69 6.03 0.71 Conv. Total (cfs) 41370.4 Conv. (cfs) 517.2 35933.4 4919.7 Length Wtd. (ft) 65.00 Wetted Per. (ft) 7.04 51.17 116.94 Min Ch El (ft) 17.71 Shear (lb/sq ft) 0.13 0.61 0.07 Alpha 1.15 Stream Power (lb/ft s) 0.32 3.04 0.18 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.15 Cum Volume (acre-ft) 0.02 1.25 0.26 C & E Loss (ft) 0.09 Cum SA (acres) 0.01 0.23 0.23 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1869 Profile: 500 year E.G. Elev (ft) 29.15 Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.10 Wt. n-Val. 0.030 0.040 0.030 W.S. Elev (ft) 29.06 Reach Len. (ft) 65.00 65.00 65.00 Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) 71.04 489.86 542.73 E.G. Slope (ft/ft) 0.000278 Area (sq ft) 71.04 489.86 593.03 Q Total (cfs) 2600.00 Flow (cfs) 79.54 1368.18 1152.27 Top Width (ft) 222.39 Top Width (ft) 48.97 49.53 123.89 Vel Total (ft/s) 2.36 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) 1.12 2.79 2.12 Max Chl Dpth (ft) 11.35 Hydr. Depth (ft) 1.45 9.89 4.38 Conv. Total (cfs) 155911.1 Conv. (cfs) 4770.0 82044.1 69097.0 Length Wtd. (ft) 65.00 Wetted Per. (ft) 55.89 51.17 134.40 Min Ch El (ft) 17.71 Shear (lb/sq ft) 0.02 0.17 0.07 Alpha 1.11 Stream Power (lb/ft s) 0.02 0.46 0.15 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.03 Cum Volume (acre-ft) 0.16 1.96 2.11 C & E Loss (ft) 0.03 Cum SA (acres) 0.12 0.23 0.67 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1804 Profile: 100 year E.G. Elev (ft) 25.30 Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.65 Wt. n-Val. 0.040 W.S. Elev (ft) 24.65 Reach Len. (ft) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit W.S. (ft) 21.89 Flow Area (sq ft) 263.81 E.G. Slope (ft/ft) 0.003282 Area (sq ft) 263.81 73.22 Q Total (cfs) 1700.00 Flow (cfs) 1700.00 Top Width (ft) 117.59 Top Width (ft) 40.00 77.59 Vel Total (ft/s) 6.44 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) 6.44 Max Chl Dpth (ft) 7.25 Hydr. Depth (ft) 6.60 Conv. Total (cfs) 29673.6 Conv. (cfs) 29673.6 Length Wtd. (ft) 1.00 Wetted Per. (ft) 50.07 Min Ch El (ft) 17.40 Shear (lb/sq ft) 1.08 Alpha 1.00 Stream Power (lb/ft s) 6.96 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.01 Cum Volume (acre-ft) 0.01 0.84 0.11 C & E Loss (ft) 0.22 Cum SA (acres) 0.00 0.16 0.09 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1804 Profile: 500 year E.G. Elev (ft) 29.10 Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.18 Wt. n-Val. 0.030 0.040 0.030 W.S. Elev (ft) 28.92 Reach Len. (ft) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit W.S. (ft) 23.14 Flow Area (sq ft) 29.05 434.48 323.28 E.G. Slope (ft/ft) 0.000683 Area (sq ft) 29.05 434.48 423.52 Q Total (cfs) 2600.00 Flow (cfs) 34.79 1603.67 961.54 Top Width (ft) 157.84 Top Width (ft) 31.22 40.00 86.62 Vel Total (ft/s) 3.30 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) 1.20 3.69 2.97 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1804 Profile: 500 year (Continued) Max Chl Dpth (ft) 11.52 Hydr. Depth (ft) 0.93 10.86 3.73 Conv. Total (cfs) 99491.7 Conv. (cfs) 1331.1 61366.1 36794.5 Length Wtd. (ft) 1.00 Wetted Per. (ft) 32.66 58.60 92.81 Min Ch El (ft) 17.40 Shear (lb/sq ft) 0.04 0.32 0.15 Alpha 1.07 Stream Power (lb/ft s) 0.05 1.17 0.44 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.00 Cum Volume (acre-ft) 0.08 1.27 1.35 C & E Loss (ft) 0.10 Cum SA (acres) 0.06 0.16 0.52 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1734 Profile: 100 year E.G. Elev (ft) 23.82 Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.85 Wt. n-Val. 0.030 0.040 0.030 W.S. Elev (ft) 22.98 Reach Len. (ft) 50.00 50.00 50.00 Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) 14.69 215.31 6.14 E.G. Slope (ft/ft) 0.004478 Area (sq ft) 14.69 215.31 6.14 Q Total (cfs) 1700.00 Flow (cfs) 74.66 1612.75 12.59 Top Width (ft) 55.58 Top Width (ft) 3.00 40.00 12.58 Vel Total (ft/s) 7.20 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) 5.08 7.49 2.05 Max Chl Dpth (ft) 7.18 Hydr. Depth (ft) 4.90 5.38 0.49 Conv. Total (cfs) 25404.5 Conv. (cfs) 1115.8 24100.6 188.1 Length Wtd. (ft) 50.00 Wetted Per. (ft) 7.74 41.16 12.62 Min Ch El (ft) 15.80 Shear (lb/sq ft) 0.53 1.46 0.14 Alpha 1.05 Stream Power (lb/ft s) 2.70 10.95 0.28 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.29 Cum Volume (acre-ft) 0.01 0.52 0.10 C & E Loss (ft) 0.13 Cum SA (acres) 0.00 0.11 0.06 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1734 Profile: 500 year E.G. Elev (ft) 26.52 Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.40 Wt. n-Val. 0.030 0.040 0.030 W.S. Elev (ft) 26.12 Reach Len. (ft) 50.00 50.00 50.00 Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) 24.13 341.13 256.32 E.G. Slope (ft/ft) 0.001403 Area (sq ft) 24.13 341.13 447.26 Q Total (cfs) 2600.00 Flow (cfs) 76.10 1943.71 580.18 Top Width (ft) 231.90 Top Width (ft) 3.00 40.00 188.90 Vel Total (ft/s) 4.18 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) 3.15 5.70 2.26 Max Chl Dpth (ft) 10.32 Hydr. Depth (ft) 8.04 8.53 1.36 Conv. Total (cfs) 69417.1 Conv. (cfs) 2031.9 51894.9 15490.3 Length Wtd. (ft) 50.00 Wetted Per. (ft) 10.88 41.16 190.18 Min Ch El (ft) 15.80 Shear (lb/sq ft) 0.19 0.73 0.12 Alpha 1.47 Stream Power (lb/ft s) 0.61 4.14 0.27 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.05 Cum Volume (acre-ft) 0.07 0.80 0.78 C & E Loss (ft) 0.09 Cum SA (acres) 0.06 0.11 0.29 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1684 Profile: 100 year E.G. Elev (ft) 23.41 Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.27 Wt. n-Val. 0.100 0.040 0.030 W.S. Elev (ft) 22.14 Reach Len. (ft) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit W.S. (ft) 20.82 Flow Area (sq ft) 0.01 187.96 0.04 E.G. Slope (ft/ft) 0.007508 Area (sq ft) 0.01 187.96 162.43 Q Total (cfs) 1700.00 Flow (cfs) 0.00 1699.97 0.03 Top Width (ft) 122.47 Top Width (ft) 0.14 34.00 88.33 Vel Total (ft/s) 9.04 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) 0.17 9.04 0.71 Max Chl Dpth (ft) 6.84 Hydr. Depth (ft) 0.07 5.53 0.07 Conv. Total (cfs) 19619.2 Conv. (cfs) 0.0 19618.9 0.3 Length Wtd. (ft) 1.00 Wetted Per. (ft) 0.19 39.91 0.58 Min Ch El (ft) 15.30 Shear (lb/sq ft) 0.02 2.21 0.03 Alpha 1.00 Stream Power (lb/ft s) 0.00 19.97 0.02 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.01 Cum Volume (acre-ft) 0.00 0.29 0.00 C & E Loss (ft) 0.32 Cum SA (acres) 0.00 0.06 0.00 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1684 Profile: 500 year E.G. Elev (ft) 26.37 Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.21 Wt. n-Val. 0.100 0.040 0.030 W.S. Elev (ft) 26.16 Reach Len. (ft) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit W.S. (ft) 22.29 Flow Area (sq ft) 51.73 324.81 464.22 E.G. Slope (ft/ft) 0.000873 Area (sq ft) 51.73 324.81 861.54 Q Total (cfs) 2600.00 Flow (cfs) 24.06 1442.17 1133.76 Top Width (ft) 292.53 Top Width (ft) 46.53 34.00 212.00 Vel Total (ft/s) 3.09 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) 0.47 4.44 2.44 Max Chl Dpth (ft) 10.86 Hydr. Depth (ft) 1.11 9.55 2.19 Conv. Total (cfs) 88014.7 Conv. (cfs) 814.6 48820.1 38380.0 Length Wtd. (ft) 1.00 Wetted Per. (ft) 47.42 39.91 215.27 Min Ch El (ft) 15.30 Shear (lb/sq ft) 0.06 0.44 0.12 Alpha 1.42 Stream Power (lb/ft s) 0.03 1.97 0.29 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.00 Cum Volume (acre-ft) 0.03 0.41 0.03 C & E Loss (ft) 0.94 Cum SA (acres) 0.03 0.07 0.06 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1869 Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 LOB 172.83 185.17 21.25 8.92 7.04 1.25 1.69 2.38 0.13 0.32 2 Chan 185.17 188.47 52.51 15.02 4.13 3.09 4.55 3.50 0.38 1.34 3 Chan 188.47 191.77 109.05 22.45 3.77 6.41 6.80 4.86 0.63 3.05 4 Chan 191.77 195.08 131.00 23.76 3.30 7.71 7.20 5.51 0.76 4.18 5 Chan 195.08 198.38 131.00 23.76 3.30 7.71 7.20 5.51 0.76 4.18 6 Chan 198.38 201.68 131.00 23.76 3.30 7.71 7.20 5.51 0.76 4.18 7 Chan 201.68 204.98 133.33 24.04 3.31 7.84 7.28 5.55 0.77 4.25 8 Chan 204.98 208.28 136.20 24.37 3.32 8.01 7.38 5.59 0.77 4.32 9 Chan 208.28 211.59 125.57 23.22 3.32 7.39 7.03 5.41 0.74 3.98 10 Chan 211.59 214.89 114.54 21.98 3.32 6.74 6.66 5.21 0.70 3.63 11 Chan 214.89 218.19 101.77 20.52 3.34 5.99 6.22 4.96 0.65 3.21 12 Chan 218.19 221.49 87.26 18.72 3.35 5.13 5.67 4.66 0.59 2.75 13 Chan 221.49 224.79 74.03 16.96 3.34 4.35 5.14 4.37 0.53 2.33 14 Chan 224.79 228.10 61.33 15.15 3.35 3.61 4.59 4.05 0.48 1.93 15 Chan 228.10 231.40 49.42 13.31 3.35 2.91 4.03 3.71 0.42 1.56 16 Chan 231.40 234.70 38.57 11.47 3.35 2.27 3.47 3.36 0.36 1.21 17 ROB 234.70 247.60 121.33 34.03 12.95 7.14 2.64 3.57 0.28 0.99 18 ROB 247.60 260.50 47.85 19.46 12.94 2.81 1.51 2.46 0.16 0.39 19 ROB 260.50 273.40 23.61 12.87 13.28 1.39 1.04 1.83 0.10 0.19 20 ROB 273.40 286.30 0.00 0.00 21 ROB 286.30 299.20 0.00 0.00 22 ROB 299.20 312.10 0.00 0.00 23 ROB 312.10 325.00 0.00 0.00 24 ROB 325.00 336.63 1.33 7.25 11.81 0.08 0.65 0.18 0.06 0.01 25 ROB 336.63 348.25 1.42 10.59 11.83 0.08 0.91 0.13 0.09 0.01 26 ROB 348.25 359.88 1.43 12.80 11.63 0.08 1.10 0.11 0.12 0.01 27 ROB 359.88 371.50 1.43 11.58 11.63 0.08 1.00 0.12 0.11 0.01 28 ROB 371.50 383.13 1.43 10.37 11.63 0.08 0.89 0.14 0.09 0.01 29 ROB 383.13 394.75 1.43 8.62 11.63 0.08 0.74 0.17 0.08 0.01 30 ROB 394.75 406.38 0.88 4.07 7.63 0.05 0.54 0.22 0.06 0.01 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1869 Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 LOB 74.07 86.41 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 2 LOB 86.41 98.76 3.42 6.50 12.40 0.13 0.53 0.53 0.01 0.00 3 LOB 98.76 111.10 11.37 13.34 12.34 0.44 1.08 0.85 0.02 0.02 4 LOB 111.10 123.45 12.69 14.24 12.34 0.49 1.15 0.89 0.02 0.02 5 LOB 123.45 135.79 6.27 7.67 7.56 0.24 1.21 0.82 0.02 0.01 6 LOB 135.79 148.14 0.00 0.00 7 LOB 148.14 160.48 0.00 0.00 8 LOB 160.48 172.83 0.00 0.00 9 LOB 172.83 185.17 45.80 29.28 10.90 1.76 5.56 1.56 0.05 0.07 10 Chan 185.17 188.47 60.44 27.77 4.13 2.32 8.41 2.18 0.12 0.25 11 Chan 188.47 191.77 95.35 35.20 3.77 3.67 10.66 2.71 0.16 0.44 12 Chan 191.77 195.08 110.75 36.52 3.30 4.26 11.06 3.03 0.19 0.58 13 Chan 195.08 198.38 110.75 36.52 3.30 4.26 11.06 3.03 0.19 0.58 14 Chan 198.38 201.68 110.75 36.52 3.30 4.26 11.06 3.03 0.19 0.58 15 Chan 201.68 204.98 111.96 36.79 3.31 4.31 11.14 3.04 0.19 0.59 16 Chan 204.98 208.28 113.45 37.13 3.32 4.36 11.25 3.06 0.19 0.59 17 Chan 208.28 211.59 107.59 35.98 3.32 4.14 10.90 2.99 0.19 0.56 18 Chan 211.59 214.89 101.45 34.74 3.32 3.90 10.52 2.92 0.18 0.53 19 Chan 214.89 218.19 94.08 33.28 3.34 3.62 10.08 2.83 0.17 0.49 20 Chan 218.19 221.49 85.69 31.48 3.35 3.30 9.53 2.72 0.16 0.44 21 Chan 221.49 224.79 77.88 29.71 3.34 3.00 9.00 2.62 0.15 0.40 22 Chan 224.79 228.10 70.10 27.91 3.35 2.70 8.45 2.51 0.14 0.36 23 Chan 228.10 231.40 62.57 26.07 3.35 2.41 7.90 2.40 0.14 0.32 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1869 Profile: 500 year (Continued) Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 24 Chan 231.40 234.70 55.38 24.23 3.35 2.13 7.34 2.29 0.13 0.29 25 ROB 234.70 247.60 233.36 83.87 12.95 8.98 6.50 2.78 0.11 0.31 26 ROB 247.60 260.50 169.91 69.30 12.94 6.53 5.37 2.45 0.09 0.23 27 ROB 260.50 273.40 112.35 60.51 17.14 4.32 4.91 1.86 0.06 0.11 28 ROB 273.40 286.30 0.00 0.00 29 ROB 286.30 299.20 0.00 0.00 30 ROB 299.20 312.10 0.00 0.00 31 ROB 312.10 325.00 0.00 0.00 32 ROB 325.00 336.63 73.88 50.47 15.67 2.84 4.51 1.46 0.06 0.08 33 ROB 336.63 348.25 95.04 55.50 11.83 3.66 4.77 1.71 0.08 0.14 34 ROB 348.25 359.88 96.16 57.71 11.63 3.70 4.96 1.67 0.09 0.14 35 ROB 359.88 371.50 96.16 56.50 11.63 3.70 4.86 1.70 0.08 0.14 36 ROB 371.50 383.13 96.16 55.28 11.63 3.70 4.76 1.74 0.08 0.14 37 ROB 383.13 394.75 96.16 53.53 11.63 3.70 4.60 1.80 0.08 0.14 38 ROB 394.75 406.38 79.18 45.33 12.11 3.05 3.90 1.75 0.07 0.11 39 ROB 406.38 418.00 3.91 5.03 5.25 0.15 1.04 0.78 0.02 0.01 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1804 Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 178.00 181.07 7.26 4.23 4.89 0.43 3.96 1.72 0.18 0.30 2 Chan 181.07 184.13 85.18 16.68 3.77 5.01 5.44 5.11 0.91 4.63 3 Chan 184.13 187.20 145.15 21.68 3.27 8.54 7.07 6.69 1.36 9.11 4 Chan 187.20 190.27 155.18 22.01 3.07 9.13 7.18 7.05 1.47 10.37 5 Chan 190.27 193.33 155.92 22.08 3.07 9.17 7.20 7.06 1.48 10.42 6 Chan 193.33 196.40 156.66 22.14 3.07 9.22 7.22 7.08 1.48 10.47 7 Chan 196.40 199.47 157.40 22.20 3.07 9.26 7.24 7.09 1.48 10.52 8 Chan 199.47 202.53 155.46 22.05 3.07 9.14 7.19 7.05 1.47 10.37 9 Chan 202.53 205.60 148.97 21.50 3.07 8.76 7.01 6.93 1.43 9.94 10 Chan 205.60 208.67 142.51 20.93 3.07 8.38 6.83 6.81 1.40 9.50 11 Chan 208.67 211.73 134.36 20.24 3.09 7.90 6.60 6.64 1.34 8.92 12 Chan 211.73 214.80 120.32 18.97 3.10 7.08 6.19 6.34 1.25 7.96 13 Chan 214.80 217.87 106.46 17.63 3.10 6.26 5.75 6.04 1.17 7.04 14 Chan 217.87 220.93 29.16 11.47 7.38 1.72 5.38 2.54 0.32 0.81 15 Chan 220.93 224.00 0.00 0.00 16 ROB 224.00 236.50 0.00 0.00 17 ROB 236.50 249.00 0.00 0.00 18 ROB 249.00 261.50 0.00 0.00 19 ROB 261.50 274.00 0.00 0.00 20 ROB 274.00 286.50 0.00 0.00 21 ROB 286.50 299.00 0.00 0.00 22 ROB 299.00 311.50 0.00 0.00 23 ROB 311.50 324.00 0.00 0.00 24 ROB 324.00 337.43 0.00 7.42 13.08 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.12 0.00 25 ROB 337.43 350.86 0.00 15.57 13.72 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.23 0.00 26 ROB 350.86 364.29 0.00 16.35 13.43 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.25 0.00 27 ROB 364.29 377.71 0.00 14.13 13.43 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.22 0.00 28 ROB 377.71 391.14 0.00 11.91 13.43 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.18 0.00 29 ROB 391.14 404.57 0.00 7.83 11.46 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.14 0.00 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1804 Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 LOB 94.93 106.80 7.10 6.98 9.86 0.27 0.74 1.02 0.03 0.03 2 LOB 106.80 118.67 14.76 11.66 11.87 0.57 0.98 1.27 0.04 0.05 3 LOB 118.67 130.53 12.92 10.41 10.93 0.50 1.05 1.24 0.04 0.05 4 LOB 130.53 142.40 0.00 0.00 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1804 Profile: 500 year (Continued) Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 5 LOB 142.40 154.27 0.00 0.00 6 LOB 154.27 166.13 0.00 0.00 7 LOB 166.13 178.00 0.00 0.00 8 Chan 178.00 181.07 6.78 8.78 9.16 0.26 8.23 0.77 0.04 0.03 9 Chan 181.07 184.13 93.76 29.76 3.77 3.61 9.71 3.15 0.34 1.06 10 Chan 184.13 187.20 133.68 34.77 3.27 5.14 11.34 3.84 0.45 1.75 11 Chan 187.20 190.27 141.58 35.10 3.07 5.45 11.44 4.03 0.49 1.97 12 Chan 190.27 193.33 142.01 35.16 3.07 5.46 11.47 4.04 0.49 1.97 13 Chan 193.33 196.40 142.43 35.22 3.07 5.48 11.49 4.04 0.49 1.98 14 Chan 196.40 199.47 142.85 35.29 3.07 5.49 11.51 4.05 0.49 1.99 15 Chan 199.47 202.53 141.69 35.13 3.07 5.45 11.46 4.03 0.49 1.97 16 Chan 202.53 205.60 137.96 34.58 3.07 5.31 11.28 3.99 0.48 1.91 17 Chan 205.60 208.67 134.22 34.02 3.07 5.16 11.09 3.95 0.47 1.86 18 Chan 208.67 211.73 129.32 33.33 3.09 4.97 10.87 3.88 0.46 1.79 19 Chan 211.73 214.80 120.92 32.06 3.10 4.65 10.45 3.77 0.44 1.66 20 Chan 214.80 217.87 112.59 30.71 3.10 4.33 10.02 3.67 0.42 1.55 21 Chan 217.87 220.93 23.88 20.57 11.65 0.92 9.64 1.16 0.08 0.09 22 Chan 220.93 224.00 0.00 0.00 23 ROB 224.00 236.50 0.00 0.00 24 ROB 236.50 249.00 0.00 0.00 25 ROB 249.00 261.50 0.00 0.00 26 ROB 261.50 274.00 0.00 0.00 27 ROB 274.00 286.50 0.00 0.00 28 ROB 286.50 299.00 0.00 0.00 29 ROB 299.00 311.50 0.00 0.00 30 ROB 311.50 324.00 0.00 0.00 31 ROB 324.00 337.43 124.73 61.05 17.35 4.80 4.86 2.04 0.15 0.31 32 ROB 337.43 350.86 162.87 72.86 13.72 6.26 5.43 2.24 0.23 0.51 33 ROB 350.86 364.29 165.22 73.65 13.43 6.35 5.48 2.24 0.23 0.52 34 ROB 364.29 377.71 165.22 71.43 13.43 6.35 5.32 2.31 0.23 0.52 35 ROB 377.71 391.14 165.22 69.21 13.43 6.35 5.15 2.39 0.22 0.52 36 ROB 391.14 404.57 159.85 64.06 13.81 6.15 4.77 2.50 0.20 0.49 37 ROB 404.57 418.00 18.44 11.27 7.64 0.71 1.63 1.64 0.06 0.10 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 BR U Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 181.07 184.13 8.88 3.21 5.50 0.52 1.36 2.76 0.62 1.71 2 Chan 184.13 187.20 69.09 11.81 6.55 4.06 3.85 5.85 1.91 11.19 3 Chan 187.20 190.27 111.89 15.54 6.31 6.58 5.07 7.20 2.61 18.78 4 Chan 190.27 193.33 143.65 17.89 6.17 8.45 5.83 8.03 3.07 24.66 5 Chan 193.33 196.40 210.23 19.13 4.12 12.37 6.24 10.99 4.92 54.05 6 Chan 196.40 199.47 259.38 19.28 3.07 15.26 6.29 13.45 6.66 89.64 7 Chan 199.47 202.53 255.75 19.13 3.07 15.04 6.24 13.37 6.60 88.25 8 Chan 202.53 205.60 243.45 18.57 3.07 14.32 6.06 13.11 6.41 83.98 9 Chan 205.60 208.67 165.69 17.75 4.89 9.75 5.79 9.33 3.85 35.93 10 Chan 208.67 211.73 113.36 15.57 6.22 6.67 5.08 7.28 2.65 19.32 11 Chan 211.73 214.80 74.35 12.11 6.25 4.37 3.95 6.14 2.05 12.60 12 Chan 214.80 217.87 37.00 8.02 6.35 2.18 2.61 4.61 1.34 6.17 13 Chan 217.87 220.93 7.28 2.79 5.19 0.43 1.31 2.61 0.57 1.49 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 BR U Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 LOB 94.93 106.80 5.49 3.21 7.51 0.21 0.45 1.71 0.10 0.17 2 LOB 106.80 118.67 12.39 6.28 11.87 0.48 0.53 1.97 0.12 0.24 3 LOB 118.67 130.53 12.27 5.94 10.47 0.47 0.60 2.07 0.13 0.27 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 BR U Profile: 500 year (Continued) Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 4 LOB 130.53 142.40 0.00 0.00 5 LOB 142.40 154.27 0.00 0.00 6 LOB 154.27 166.13 0.00 0.00 7 LOB 166.13 178.00 0.00 0.00 8 Chan 178.00 181.07 0.00 0.00 9 Chan 181.07 184.13 4.68 3.21 5.50 0.18 1.36 1.46 0.14 0.20 10 Chan 184.13 187.20 36.41 11.81 6.55 1.40 3.85 3.08 0.42 1.30 11 Chan 187.20 190.27 58.96 15.54 6.31 2.27 5.07 3.79 0.58 2.18 12 Chan 190.27 193.33 75.70 17.89 6.17 2.91 5.83 4.23 0.68 2.87 13 Chan 193.33 196.40 86.43 19.35 6.16 3.32 6.31 4.47 0.73 3.28 14 Chan 196.40 199.47 91.91 20.05 6.14 3.53 6.54 4.58 0.76 3.50 15 Chan 199.47 202.53 92.91 20.18 6.14 3.57 6.58 4.60 0.77 3.54 16 Chan 202.53 205.60 87.64 19.50 6.15 3.37 6.36 4.49 0.74 3.33 17 Chan 205.60 208.67 75.60 17.88 6.18 2.91 5.83 4.23 0.68 2.86 18 Chan 208.67 211.73 59.74 15.57 6.22 2.30 5.08 3.84 0.59 2.25 19 Chan 211.73 214.80 39.18 12.11 6.25 1.51 3.95 3.24 0.45 1.47 20 Chan 214.80 217.87 19.50 8.02 6.35 0.75 2.61 2.43 0.30 0.72 21 Chan 217.87 220.93 3.84 2.79 5.19 0.15 1.31 1.38 0.13 0.17 22 Chan 220.93 224.00 0.00 0.00 23 ROB 224.00 236.50 0.00 0.00 24 ROB 236.50 249.00 0.00 0.00 25 ROB 249.00 261.50 0.00 0.00 26 ROB 261.50 274.00 0.00 0.00 27 ROB 274.00 286.50 0.00 0.00 28 ROB 286.50 299.00 0.00 0.00 29 ROB 299.00 311.50 0.00 0.00 30 ROB 311.50 324.00 0.00 0.00 31 ROB 324.00 337.43 242.92 55.35 16.90 9.34 4.40 4.39 0.77 3.36 32 ROB 337.43 350.86 311.65 66.78 13.72 11.99 4.97 4.67 1.14 5.31 33 ROB 350.86 364.29 316.14 67.56 13.43 12.16 5.03 4.68 1.18 5.50 34 ROB 364.29 377.71 316.14 65.35 13.43 12.16 4.87 4.84 1.14 5.50 35 ROB 377.71 391.14 316.14 63.13 13.43 12.16 4.70 5.01 1.10 5.50 36 ROB 391.14 404.57 305.29 57.97 13.81 11.74 4.32 5.27 0.98 5.17 37 ROB 404.57 418.00 29.07 8.36 6.58 1.12 1.41 3.48 0.30 1.03 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 BR D Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 181.13 184.27 10.26 3.57 5.79 0.60 1.43 2.87 0.68 1.95 2 Chan 184.27 187.40 73.66 12.32 6.65 4.33 3.93 5.98 2.04 12.19 3 Chan 187.40 190.53 116.82 16.04 6.44 6.87 5.12 7.28 2.74 19.97 4 Chan 190.53 193.67 173.02 18.12 4.84 10.18 5.78 9.55 4.12 39.30 5 Chan 193.67 196.80 236.20 18.35 3.13 13.89 5.86 12.87 6.44 82.94 6 Chan 196.80 199.93 236.20 18.35 3.13 13.89 5.86 12.87 6.44 82.94 7 Chan 199.93 203.07 232.51 18.18 3.14 13.68 5.80 12.79 6.38 81.60 8 Chan 203.07 206.20 225.09 17.83 3.14 13.24 5.69 12.62 6.26 78.99 9 Chan 206.20 209.33 204.36 17.47 3.44 12.02 5.58 11.70 5.58 65.27 10 Chan 209.33 212.47 116.77 15.95 6.35 6.87 5.09 7.32 2.76 20.24 11 Chan 212.47 215.60 67.86 12.00 7.04 3.99 3.83 5.65 1.88 10.61 12 Chan 215.60 218.73 7.24 3.07 6.70 0.43 0.98 2.36 0.50 1.19 13 Chan 218.73 221.87 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.20 0.01 0.00 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 BR D Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 181.13 184.27 19.43 3.57 5.79 0.75 1.43 5.44 1.89 10.30 2 Chan 184.27 187.40 139.56 12.32 6.65 5.37 3.93 11.33 5.69 64.39 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 BR D Profile: 500 year (Continued) Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 3 Chan 187.40 190.53 221.35 16.04 6.44 8.51 5.12 13.80 7.65 105.52 4 Chan 190.53 193.67 279.18 18.29 6.31 10.74 5.84 15.27 8.90 135.84 5 Chan 193.67 196.80 316.28 19.68 6.29 12.16 6.28 16.07 9.61 154.39 6 Chan 196.80 199.93 333.23 20.29 6.27 12.82 6.48 16.42 9.93 163.06 7 Chan 199.93 203.07 334.44 20.33 6.27 12.86 6.49 16.45 9.95 163.70 8 Chan 203.07 206.20 318.31 19.76 6.28 12.24 6.30 16.11 9.65 155.44 9 Chan 206.20 209.33 274.67 18.11 6.31 10.56 5.78 15.17 8.81 133.60 10 Chan 209.33 212.47 221.25 15.95 6.35 8.51 5.09 13.88 7.71 106.97 11 Chan 212.47 215.60 128.58 12.00 7.04 4.95 3.83 10.71 5.23 56.04 12 Chan 215.60 218.73 13.72 3.07 6.70 0.53 0.98 4.47 1.41 6.29 13 Chan 218.73 221.87 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.39 0.04 0.01 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1794 Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 178.00 181.13 7.66 3.36 3.95 0.45 2.96 2.28 0.30 0.69 2 Chan 181.13 184.27 84.83 14.07 3.86 4.99 4.49 6.03 1.30 7.87 3 Chan 184.27 187.40 155.79 19.05 3.30 9.16 6.08 8.18 2.06 16.86 4 Chan 187.40 190.53 164.08 19.24 3.13 9.65 6.14 8.53 2.20 18.72 5 Chan 190.53 193.67 164.08 19.24 3.13 9.65 6.14 8.53 2.20 18.72 6 Chan 193.67 196.80 164.08 19.24 3.13 9.65 6.14 8.53 2.20 18.72 7 Chan 196.80 199.93 164.08 19.24 3.13 9.65 6.14 8.53 2.20 18.72 8 Chan 199.93 203.07 161.63 19.07 3.14 9.51 6.09 8.47 2.17 18.43 9 Chan 203.07 206.20 156.71 18.72 3.14 9.22 5.98 8.37 2.13 17.87 10 Chan 206.20 209.33 151.85 18.37 3.14 8.93 5.86 8.27 2.09 17.31 11 Chan 209.33 212.47 147.05 18.02 3.14 8.65 5.75 8.16 2.05 16.77 12 Chan 212.47 215.60 111.02 16.44 3.80 6.53 5.25 6.75 1.55 10.45 13 Chan 215.60 218.73 58.44 10.66 3.37 3.44 3.40 5.48 1.13 6.21 14 Chan 218.73 221.87 8.72 3.66 4.05 0.51 2.89 2.38 0.32 0.77 15 Chan 221.87 225.00 0.00 0.00 16 ROB 225.00 237.38 0.00 0.00 17 ROB 237.38 249.75 0.00 0.00 18 ROB 249.75 262.13 0.00 0.00 19 ROB 262.13 274.50 0.00 0.00 20 ROB 274.50 286.88 0.00 0.00 21 ROB 286.88 299.25 0.00 0.00 22 ROB 299.25 311.63 0.00 0.00 23 ROB 311.63 324.00 0.00 0.00 24 ROB 324.00 337.43 0.00 0.00 25 ROB 337.43 350.86 0.00 3.61 8.60 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.15 0.00 26 ROB 350.86 364.29 0.00 4.19 13.43 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.11 0.00 27 ROB 364.29 377.71 0.00 2.00 13.43 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.05 0.00 28 ROB 377.71 391.14 0.00 0.26 7.86 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1794 Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 178.00 181.13 11.51 6.11 6.38 0.44 5.39 1.89 0.22 0.41 2 Chan 181.13 184.27 133.01 21.68 3.86 5.12 6.92 6.14 1.28 7.83 3 Chan 184.27 187.40 208.11 26.65 3.30 8.00 8.51 7.81 1.83 14.30 4 Chan 187.40 190.53 218.14 26.84 3.13 8.39 8.57 8.13 1.94 15.80 5 Chan 190.53 193.67 218.14 26.84 3.13 8.39 8.57 8.13 1.94 15.80 6 Chan 193.67 196.80 218.14 26.84 3.13 8.39 8.57 8.13 1.94 15.80 7 Chan 196.80 199.93 218.14 26.84 3.13 8.39 8.57 8.13 1.94 15.80 8 Chan 199.93 203.07 215.78 26.68 3.14 8.30 8.51 8.09 1.93 15.62 9 Chan 203.07 206.20 211.07 26.33 3.14 8.12 8.40 8.02 1.91 15.28 10 Chan 206.20 209.33 206.41 25.98 3.14 7.94 8.29 7.95 1.88 14.94 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1794 Profile: 500 year (Continued) Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 11 Chan 209.33 212.47 201.79 25.63 3.14 7.76 8.18 7.87 1.85 14.61 12 Chan 212.47 215.60 159.67 24.04 3.80 6.14 7.67 6.64 1.44 9.54 13 Chan 215.60 218.73 109.43 18.26 3.37 4.21 5.83 5.99 1.23 7.38 14 Chan 218.73 221.87 13.43 6.74 6.48 0.52 5.32 1.99 0.24 0.47 15 Chan 221.87 225.00 0.00 0.00 16 ROB 225.00 237.38 0.00 0.00 17 ROB 237.38 249.75 0.00 0.00 18 ROB 249.75 262.13 0.00 0.00 19 ROB 262.13 274.50 0.00 0.00 20 ROB 274.50 286.88 0.00 0.00 21 ROB 286.88 299.25 0.00 0.00 22 ROB 299.25 311.63 0.00 0.00 23 ROB 311.63 324.00 0.00 0.00 24 ROB 324.00 337.43 37.80 25.16 14.49 1.45 2.00 1.50 0.39 0.59 25 ROB 337.43 350.86 43.53 34.98 13.84 1.67 2.60 1.24 0.57 0.71 26 ROB 350.86 364.29 44.41 36.77 13.43 1.71 2.74 1.21 0.62 0.75 27 ROB 364.29 377.71 44.41 34.59 13.43 1.71 2.58 1.28 0.58 0.75 28 ROB 377.71 391.14 44.41 32.72 13.43 1.71 2.44 1.36 0.55 0.75 29 ROB 391.14 404.57 42.26 28.17 13.83 1.63 2.10 1.50 0.46 0.69 30 ROB 404.57 418.00 0.40 0.33 1.30 0.02 0.28 1.20 0.06 0.07 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1759 Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 158.23 160.72 46.22 10.76 7.02 2.72 5.00 4.29 0.88 3.79 2 Chan 160.72 163.21 117.13 12.43 2.49 6.89 4.99 9.42 2.87 27.02 3 Chan 163.21 165.71 114.85 12.30 2.50 6.76 4.94 9.33 2.83 26.38 4 Chan 165.71 168.20 125.69 13.02 2.52 7.39 5.23 9.65 2.97 28.67 5 Chan 168.20 170.69 141.31 13.97 2.52 8.31 5.61 10.11 3.19 32.24 6 Chan 170.69 173.18 157.33 14.89 2.52 9.25 5.98 10.56 3.40 35.96 7 Chan 173.18 175.67 171.57 15.68 2.51 10.09 6.29 10.94 3.59 39.24 8 Chan 175.67 178.17 165.12 15.32 2.51 9.71 6.15 10.78 3.51 37.79 9 Chan 178.17 180.66 151.02 14.52 2.51 8.88 5.83 10.40 3.32 34.57 10 Chan 180.66 183.15 137.43 13.72 2.51 8.08 5.51 10.01 3.14 31.46 11 Chan 183.15 185.64 124.35 12.92 2.51 7.31 5.19 9.62 2.96 28.46 12 Chan 185.64 188.13 110.82 12.20 2.59 6.52 4.90 9.08 2.71 24.65 13 Chan 188.13 190.63 68.33 9.58 2.91 4.02 3.84 7.14 1.89 13.48 14 Chan 190.63 193.12 34.28 6.19 2.76 2.02 2.49 5.53 1.29 7.14 15 Chan 193.12 195.61 12.64 3.38 2.71 0.74 1.36 3.74 0.72 2.68 16 ROB 195.61 209.99 21.91 7.31 14.41 1.29 0.51 3.00 0.29 0.87 17 ROB 209.99 224.37 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.00 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1759 Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 158.23 160.72 39.12 17.78 10.28 1.50 8.26 2.20 0.23 0.50 2 Chan 160.72 163.21 128.09 20.55 2.49 4.93 8.25 6.23 1.09 6.76 3 Chan 163.21 165.71 126.45 20.43 2.50 4.86 8.20 6.19 1.07 6.65 4 Chan 165.71 168.20 133.35 21.15 2.52 5.13 8.49 6.31 1.10 6.96 5 Chan 168.20 170.69 143.46 22.10 2.52 5.52 8.87 6.49 1.15 7.49 6 Chan 170.69 173.18 153.73 23.02 2.52 5.91 9.24 6.68 1.20 8.04 7 Chan 173.18 175.67 162.71 23.81 2.51 6.26 9.55 6.83 1.25 8.52 8 Chan 175.67 178.17 158.69 23.45 2.51 6.10 9.41 6.77 1.23 8.31 9 Chan 178.17 180.66 149.78 22.65 2.51 5.76 9.09 6.61 1.19 7.85 10 Chan 180.66 183.15 141.08 21.85 2.51 5.43 8.77 6.46 1.14 7.39 11 Chan 183.15 185.64 132.59 21.05 2.51 5.10 8.45 6.30 1.10 6.95 12 Chan 185.64 188.13 122.71 20.32 2.59 4.72 8.16 6.04 1.03 6.25 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1759 Profile: 500 year (Continued) Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 13 Chan 188.13 190.63 89.98 17.70 2.91 3.46 7.10 5.08 0.80 4.06 14 Chan 190.63 193.12 65.53 14.32 2.76 2.52 5.75 4.58 0.68 3.13 15 Chan 193.12 195.61 46.06 11.50 2.71 1.77 4.62 4.00 0.56 2.24 16 ROB 195.61 209.99 259.80 54.19 14.41 9.99 3.77 4.79 0.50 2.37 17 ROB 209.99 224.37 151.37 39.20 14.42 5.82 2.73 3.86 0.36 1.38 18 ROB 224.37 237.73 33.68 27.93 13.36 1.30 2.09 1.21 0.28 0.33 19 ROB 237.73 251.08 33.68 26.14 13.36 1.30 1.96 1.29 0.26 0.33 20 ROB 251.08 264.44 33.68 24.71 13.36 1.30 1.85 1.36 0.24 0.33 21 ROB 264.44 277.79 33.68 23.66 13.36 1.30 1.77 1.42 0.23 0.33 22 ROB 277.79 291.15 33.68 23.87 13.36 1.30 1.79 1.41 0.24 0.33 23 ROB 291.15 304.51 33.68 26.01 13.36 1.30 1.95 1.29 0.26 0.33 24 ROB 304.51 317.86 33.68 28.10 13.36 1.30 2.10 1.20 0.28 0.33 25 ROB 317.86 331.22 32.99 36.89 13.78 1.27 2.76 0.89 0.35 0.32 26 ROB 331.22 344.58 33.68 40.58 13.36 1.30 3.04 0.83 0.40 0.33 27 ROB 344.58 357.93 33.68 41.13 13.36 1.30 3.08 0.82 0.41 0.33 28 ROB 357.93 371.29 33.68 41.68 13.36 1.30 3.12 0.81 0.41 0.33 29 ROB 371.29 384.64 25.70 27.00 13.05 0.99 2.17 0.95 0.27 0.26 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1734 Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 LOB 172.67 185.00 74.66 14.69 7.74 4.39 4.90 5.08 0.53 2.70 2 Chan 185.00 187.67 98.44 14.04 2.69 5.79 5.26 7.01 1.46 10.22 3 Chan 187.67 190.33 110.35 15.03 2.69 6.49 5.64 7.34 1.56 11.46 4 Chan 190.33 193.00 122.80 16.03 2.69 7.22 6.01 7.66 1.66 12.75 5 Chan 193.00 195.67 135.77 17.02 2.69 7.99 6.38 7.97 1.77 14.10 6 Chan 195.67 198.33 149.26 18.02 2.69 8.78 6.76 8.28 1.87 15.50 7 Chan 198.33 201.00 162.15 18.92 2.68 9.54 7.09 8.57 1.97 16.88 8 Chan 201.00 203.67 160.55 18.77 2.67 9.44 7.04 8.56 1.96 16.80 9 Chan 203.67 206.33 153.11 18.27 2.68 9.01 6.85 8.38 1.90 15.96 10 Chan 206.33 209.00 140.05 17.34 2.69 8.24 6.50 8.07 1.80 14.54 11 Chan 209.00 211.67 122.22 16.12 2.75 7.19 6.05 7.58 1.64 12.42 12 Chan 211.67 214.33 100.81 14.31 2.73 5.93 5.37 7.04 1.47 10.33 13 Chan 214.33 217.00 77.08 12.44 2.87 4.53 4.66 6.20 1.21 7.51 14 Chan 217.00 219.67 46.83 9.28 2.92 2.75 3.48 5.05 0.89 4.49 15 Chan 219.67 222.33 23.39 6.12 2.92 1.38 2.30 3.82 0.59 2.24 16 Chan 222.33 225.00 9.94 3.59 2.78 0.58 1.35 2.77 0.36 1.00 17 ROB 225.00 235.57 12.54 6.03 10.60 0.74 0.57 2.08 0.16 0.33 18 ROB 235.57 246.13 0.05 0.11 2.02 0.00 0.06 0.45 0.02 0.01 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1734 Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 LOB 172.67 185.00 76.10 24.13 10.88 2.93 8.04 3.15 0.19 0.61 2 Chan 185.00 187.67 124.74 22.43 2.69 4.80 8.41 5.56 0.73 4.06 3 Chan 187.67 190.33 134.10 23.42 2.69 5.16 8.78 5.73 0.76 4.36 4 Chan 190.33 193.00 143.73 24.42 2.69 5.53 9.16 5.89 0.79 4.68 5 Chan 193.00 195.67 153.63 25.41 2.69 5.91 9.53 6.05 0.83 5.00 6 Chan 195.67 198.33 163.80 26.41 2.69 6.30 9.90 6.20 0.86 5.33 7 Chan 198.33 201.00 173.50 27.30 2.68 6.67 10.24 6.35 0.89 5.66 8 Chan 201.00 203.67 172.49 27.15 2.67 6.63 10.18 6.35 0.89 5.65 9 Chan 203.67 206.33 166.81 26.66 2.68 6.42 10.00 6.26 0.87 5.45 10 Chan 206.33 209.00 156.87 25.73 2.69 6.03 9.65 6.10 0.84 5.10 11 Chan 209.00 211.67 142.58 24.51 2.75 5.48 9.19 5.82 0.78 4.54 12 Chan 211.67 214.33 126.21 22.70 2.73 4.85 8.51 5.56 0.73 4.05 13 Chan 214.33 217.00 105.64 20.82 2.87 4.06 7.81 5.07 0.64 3.22 14 Chan 217.00 219.67 79.48 17.67 2.92 3.06 6.63 4.50 0.53 2.39 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1734 Profile: 500 year (Continued) Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 15 Chan 219.67 222.33 57.16 14.51 2.92 2.20 5.44 3.94 0.43 1.71 16 Chan 222.33 225.00 42.96 11.98 2.78 1.65 4.49 3.59 0.38 1.35 17 ROB 225.00 235.57 153.86 39.26 10.60 5.92 3.72 3.92 0.32 1.27 18 ROB 235.57 246.13 97.16 29.84 10.64 3.74 2.82 3.26 0.25 0.80 19 ROB 246.13 259.89 27.34 29.08 13.76 1.05 2.11 0.94 0.19 0.17 20 ROB 259.89 273.65 27.34 27.54 13.76 1.05 2.00 0.99 0.18 0.17 21 ROB 273.65 287.41 27.34 25.67 13.76 1.05 1.87 1.07 0.16 0.17 22 ROB 287.41 301.17 27.34 24.64 13.76 1.05 1.79 1.11 0.16 0.17 23 ROB 301.17 314.93 27.34 24.36 13.76 1.05 1.77 1.12 0.16 0.17 24 ROB 314.93 328.69 27.34 25.84 13.76 1.05 1.88 1.06 0.16 0.17 25 ROB 328.69 342.44 27.33 28.12 13.76 1.05 2.04 0.97 0.18 0.17 26 ROB 342.44 356.20 26.96 33.77 14.05 1.04 2.45 0.80 0.21 0.17 27 ROB 356.20 369.96 27.34 39.00 13.76 1.05 2.83 0.70 0.25 0.17 28 ROB 369.96 383.72 27.34 39.69 13.76 1.05 2.88 0.69 0.25 0.17 29 ROB 383.72 397.48 27.33 41.32 13.76 1.05 3.00 0.66 0.26 0.17 30 ROB 397.48 411.24 26.66 37.27 14.29 1.03 2.71 0.72 0.23 0.16 31 ROB 411.24 425.00 2.20 1.87 3.00 0.08 0.70 1.18 0.05 0.06 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1684 Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 LOB 172.67 185.00 0.00 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.07 0.17 0.02 0.00 2 Chan 185.00 187.27 14.75 4.65 4.03 0.87 2.05 3.18 0.54 1.72 3 Chan 187.27 189.53 64.50 9.58 2.69 3.79 4.23 6.73 1.67 11.25 4 Chan 189.53 191.80 97.31 11.80 2.44 5.72 5.20 8.25 2.26 18.68 5 Chan 191.80 194.07 127.27 13.68 2.36 7.49 6.04 9.30 2.71 25.23 6 Chan 194.07 196.33 142.27 14.41 2.28 8.37 6.36 9.87 2.97 29.28 7 Chan 196.33 198.60 150.83 14.92 2.28 8.87 6.58 10.11 3.07 31.04 8 Chan 198.60 200.87 158.64 15.38 2.28 9.33 6.78 10.32 3.17 32.68 9 Chan 200.87 203.13 155.98 15.21 2.27 9.18 6.71 10.26 3.14 32.19 10 Chan 203.13 205.40 150.43 14.88 2.27 8.85 6.57 10.11 3.07 31.05 11 Chan 205.40 207.67 144.96 14.56 2.27 8.53 6.42 9.96 3.00 29.92 12 Chan 207.67 209.93 139.58 14.23 2.27 8.21 6.28 9.81 2.94 28.81 13 Chan 209.93 212.20 129.97 13.74 2.32 7.65 6.06 9.46 2.78 26.30 14 Chan 212.20 214.47 108.26 12.40 2.36 6.37 5.47 8.73 2.47 21.53 15 Chan 214.47 216.73 87.76 10.93 2.36 5.16 4.82 8.03 2.17 17.45 16 Chan 216.73 219.00 27.46 7.61 5.44 1.62 3.36 3.61 0.66 2.37 17 ROB 219.00 224.55 0.03 0.04 0.58 0.00 0.07 0.71 0.03 0.02 18 ROB 224.55 238.31 0.00 0.00 19 ROB 238.31 252.08 0.00 0.00 20 ROB 252.08 265.84 0.00 13.36 13.67 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.46 0.00 21 ROB 265.84 279.60 0.00 28.49 13.78 0.00 2.07 0.00 0.97 0.00 22 ROB 279.60 293.37 0.00 29.41 13.76 0.00 2.14 0.00 1.00 0.00 23 ROB 293.37 307.13 0.00 29.41 13.76 0.00 2.14 0.00 1.00 0.00 24 ROB 307.13 320.89 0.00 29.41 13.76 0.00 2.14 0.00 1.00 0.00 25 ROB 320.89 334.66 0.00 28.51 13.86 0.00 2.07 0.00 0.96 0.00 26 ROB 334.66 348.42 0.00 3.79 5.58 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.32 0.00 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1684 Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 LOB 135.67 148.00 0.14 1.42 9.54 0.01 0.15 0.10 0.01 0.00 2 LOB 148.00 160.33 1.84 7.36 12.36 0.07 0.60 0.25 0.03 0.01 3 LOB 160.33 172.67 6.77 16.06 12.35 0.26 1.30 0.42 0.07 0.03 4 LOB 172.67 185.00 15.31 26.89 13.18 0.59 2.18 0.57 0.11 0.06 5 Chan 185.00 187.27 31.91 13.77 4.03 1.23 6.07 2.32 0.19 0.43 6 Chan 187.27 189.53 69.58 18.70 2.69 2.68 8.25 3.72 0.38 1.41 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1684 Profile: 500 year (Continued) Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 7 Chan 189.53 191.80 89.43 20.92 2.44 3.44 9.23 4.28 0.47 2.00 8 Chan 191.80 194.07 105.48 22.80 2.36 4.06 10.06 4.63 0.53 2.43 9 Chan 194.07 196.33 113.96 23.53 2.28 4.38 10.38 4.84 0.56 2.73 10 Chan 196.33 198.60 118.14 24.05 2.28 4.54 10.61 4.91 0.58 2.83 11 Chan 198.60 200.87 121.96 24.50 2.28 4.69 10.81 4.98 0.59 2.92 12 Chan 200.87 203.13 120.73 24.33 2.27 4.64 10.73 4.96 0.58 2.90 13 Chan 203.13 205.40 118.04 24.01 2.27 4.54 10.59 4.92 0.58 2.83 14 Chan 205.40 207.67 115.37 23.68 2.27 4.44 10.45 4.87 0.57 2.77 15 Chan 207.67 209.93 112.73 23.35 2.27 4.34 10.30 4.83 0.56 2.70 16 Chan 209.93 212.20 107.40 22.86 2.32 4.13 10.09 4.70 0.54 2.53 17 Chan 212.20 214.47 95.99 21.52 2.36 3.69 9.50 4.46 0.50 2.22 18 Chan 214.47 216.73 85.33 20.05 2.36 3.28 8.85 4.25 0.46 1.97 19 Chan 216.73 219.00 36.12 16.73 5.44 1.39 7.38 2.16 0.17 0.36 20 ROB 219.00 224.55 63.61 19.38 5.71 2.45 3.49 3.28 0.18 0.61 21 ROB 224.55 238.31 72.25 35.02 13.78 2.78 2.54 2.06 0.14 0.29 22 ROB 238.31 252.08 71.81 40.37 13.90 2.76 2.93 1.78 0.16 0.28 23 ROB 252.08 265.84 71.87 68.75 13.89 2.76 5.00 1.05 0.27 0.28 24 ROB 265.84 279.60 72.23 83.89 13.78 2.78 6.09 0.86 0.33 0.29 25 ROB 279.60 293.37 72.30 84.81 13.76 2.78 6.16 0.85 0.34 0.29 26 ROB 293.37 307.13 72.30 84.81 13.76 2.78 6.16 0.85 0.34 0.29 27 ROB 307.13 320.89 72.30 84.81 13.76 2.78 6.16 0.85 0.34 0.29 28 ROB 320.89 334.66 71.95 83.90 13.86 2.77 6.10 0.86 0.33 0.28 29 ROB 334.66 348.42 70.84 50.77 14.19 2.72 3.69 1.40 0.19 0.27 30 ROB 348.42 362.18 72.27 32.28 13.77 2.78 2.35 2.24 0.13 0.29 31 ROB 362.18 375.95 71.55 41.55 13.98 2.75 3.02 1.72 0.16 0.28 32 ROB 375.95 389.71 72.30 44.28 13.76 2.78 3.22 1.63 0.18 0.29 33 ROB 389.71 403.47 70.38 41.15 14.33 2.71 2.99 1.71 0.16 0.27 34 ROB 403.47 417.24 72.27 36.26 13.77 2.78 2.63 1.99 0.14 0.29 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 BR U Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 185.00 187.27 7.02 1.90 2.64 0.41 1.16 3.69 0.89 3.28 2 Chan 187.27 189.53 52.97 6.45 2.69 3.12 2.84 8.22 2.95 24.26 3 Chan 189.53 191.80 92.45 8.66 2.44 5.44 3.82 10.67 4.37 46.63 4 Chan 191.80 194.07 131.10 10.55 2.36 7.71 4.65 12.43 5.49 68.27 5 Chan 194.07 196.33 150.25 11.28 2.28 8.84 4.98 13.32 6.10 81.21 6 Chan 196.33 198.60 161.84 11.79 2.28 9.52 5.20 13.73 6.37 87.47 7 Chan 198.60 200.87 172.44 12.24 2.28 10.14 5.40 14.08 6.63 93.31 8 Chan 200.87 203.13 168.76 12.08 2.27 9.93 5.33 13.97 6.55 91.48 9 Chan 203.13 205.40 161.21 11.75 2.27 9.48 5.18 13.72 6.37 87.39 10 Chan 205.40 207.67 153.81 11.42 2.27 9.05 5.04 13.46 6.19 83.38 11 Chan 207.67 209.93 146.54 11.10 2.27 8.62 4.90 13.21 6.02 79.44 12 Chan 209.93 212.20 134.19 10.61 2.32 7.89 4.68 12.65 5.64 71.31 13 Chan 212.20 214.47 105.89 9.27 2.36 6.23 4.09 11.43 4.84 55.30 14 Chan 214.47 216.73 53.41 7.38 3.73 3.14 3.26 7.23 2.44 17.64 15 Chan 216.73 219.00 8.12 2.52 4.27 0.48 1.63 3.22 0.73 2.34 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 BR U Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 185.00 187.27 16.12 3.88 4.79 0.62 2.02 4.16 1.20 5.00 2 Chan 187.27 189.53 105.45 9.50 2.69 4.06 4.19 11.11 5.25 58.34 3 Chan 189.53 191.80 159.53 11.71 2.44 6.14 5.17 13.62 7.14 97.20 4 Chan 191.80 194.07 208.98 13.60 2.36 8.04 6.00 15.37 8.55 131.46 5 Chan 194.07 196.33 233.74 14.33 2.28 8.99 6.32 16.32 9.35 152.62 6 Chan 196.33 198.60 247.88 14.84 2.28 9.53 6.55 16.70 9.69 161.85 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 BR U Profile: 500 year (Continued) Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 7 Chan 198.60 200.87 260.80 15.29 2.28 10.03 6.75 17.05 10.00 170.47 8 Chan 200.87 203.13 256.39 15.13 2.27 9.86 6.67 16.95 9.90 167.90 9 Chan 203.13 205.40 247.22 14.80 2.27 9.51 6.53 16.71 9.69 161.89 10 Chan 205.40 207.67 238.19 14.47 2.27 9.16 6.38 16.46 9.48 155.98 11 Chan 207.67 209.93 229.28 14.14 2.27 8.82 6.24 16.21 9.26 150.15 12 Chan 209.93 212.20 213.44 13.66 2.32 8.21 6.03 15.63 8.77 137.02 13 Chan 212.20 214.47 124.88 11.92 3.69 4.80 5.26 10.47 4.81 50.36 14 Chan 214.47 216.73 49.61 7.74 5.00 1.91 3.42 6.41 2.30 14.75 15 Chan 216.73 219.00 8.48 2.52 4.27 0.33 1.63 3.37 0.88 2.95 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 BR D Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 174.40 179.00 0.01 0.03 0.57 0.00 0.11 0.38 0.01 0.01 2 Chan 179.00 183.60 26.59 9.53 10.07 1.56 2.07 2.79 0.29 0.81 3 Chan 183.60 188.20 163.73 23.56 6.33 9.63 5.12 6.95 1.15 7.96 4 Chan 188.20 192.80 264.03 27.70 4.64 15.53 6.02 9.53 1.84 17.54 5 Chan 192.80 197.40 270.82 28.03 4.60 15.93 6.09 9.66 1.88 18.14 6 Chan 197.40 202.00 270.82 28.03 4.60 15.93 6.09 9.66 1.88 18.14 7 Chan 202.00 206.60 270.82 28.03 4.60 15.93 6.09 9.66 1.88 18.14 8 Chan 206.60 211.20 270.82 28.03 4.60 15.93 6.09 9.66 1.88 18.14 9 Chan 211.20 215.80 155.11 22.84 6.36 9.12 4.96 6.79 1.11 7.51 10 Chan 215.80 220.40 7.25 3.43 5.48 0.43 1.49 2.12 0.19 0.41 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 BR D Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P. Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft) (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) Conv Depth(ft) (ft/s) (lb/sq ft) (lb/ft s) 1 Chan 174.40 179.00 0.01 0.03 0.57 0.00 0.11 0.46 0.02 0.01 2 Chan 179.00 183.60 31.51 9.53 10.07 1.21 2.07 3.31 0.45 1.48 3 Chan 183.60 188.20 187.15 26.27 8.78 7.20 5.71 7.12 1.41 10.07 4 Chan 188.20 192.80 429.46 33.50 4.64 16.52 7.28 12.82 3.41 43.75 5 Chan 192.80 197.40 439.00 33.83 4.60 16.88 7.35 12.98 3.47 45.09 6 Chan 197.40 202.00 439.00 33.83 4.60 16.88 7.35 12.98 3.47 45.09 7 Chan 202.00 206.60 439.00 33.83 4.60 16.88 7.35 12.98 3.47 45.09 8 Chan 206.60 211.20 439.00 33.83 4.60 16.88 7.35 12.98 3.47 45.09 9 Chan 211.20 215.80 187.28 26.31 8.80 7.20 5.72 7.12 1.41 10.05 10 Chan 215.80 220.40 8.59 3.43 5.48 0.33 1.49 2.51 0.30 0.74 OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT APPENDIX D SCOUR COMPUTATIONS HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition COMMENTS: DATE:12/11/2018 SUBMISSION TO PAUL B. BAILEY ARCHITECT, LLC REVISED:N/A - VALUE denotes field entered by user or obtained from back-up spreadsheets VALUE denotes computed field or standard value VALUE denotes sum or conclusion LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT 100-YR 2.85 N/A 1.56 1.05 8.41 4.40 3.90 500-YR 1.20 N/A 1.60 0.96 1.69 2.80 2.16 NOTE:Live Bed + Froechlich's Abutment HEC-RAS MODEL DATA (ARCH STRUCTURE BETWEEN BUILDING J & M) FILE:OXOBOXO_SCOUR.prj XS #1869 PLAN:Proposed Flow 100-YR:1700 CFS XS #1804 500-YR:2600 CFS XS #1799 BR U CRITICAL VELOCITY Ref. HEC-18, page 6.2, Equation 6.1 If Vc is less than V upstream of the contraction → Live-Bed Scour If Vc is greater than V upstream of the contraction → Clear-Water Scour 100-YR 500-YR NOTES: Ku 11.17 11.17 Ku = coefficient (English Units) y (ft)6.03 9.89 y1 = average depth in upstream main channel D50 (mm)2.20 2.20 D50 (in)0.087 0.087 D50 (ft)0.007 0.007 Vc (ft/s)2.9 3.2 V (ft/s)4.95 2.79 V =main channel velocity LIVE CLEARSCOUR TYPE: LIVE /CLEAR PRES. FLOW NOTE: ORIGINAL HEC-RAS FILE DEVELOPED BY BSC GROUP AS PART OF CTDEEP FMC SUBMISSION DATED 10/2017. YRC ADDED FLOW DISTRIBUTIONS TO ALLOW FOR SCOUR ANALYSIS. NO MODIFICATION TO THE GEOMETRY & FLOWS OCCURRED. SCOUR SUMMARY FROEHLICH'S TOTALNCHRP 24-20STORM CONTRACTION SCOUR DETERMINATION VARIABLE STORM EVENT ()31 5061DyKVuc= HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition LIVE-BED CONTRACTION CLEAR WATER CONTRACTION Ref. HEC-18, page 6.10, Equations 6.2 and 6.3 Ref. HEC-18, page 6.12, Equations 6.4 and 6.5 100-YR 500-YR NOTES: Ku -0.0077 0.0077 Ku = coefficient (English Units) Dm (ft)0.009 0.009 Dm = 1.25 D50 y1 (ft)6.03 9.89 y1 = average depth in upstream main channel yo (ft)5.18 5.54 yo = average existing depth in the contracted section W1 (ft)49.53 49.53 W1 = bottom width upstream main channel W2 (ft)38.24 38.24 W2 = bottom width main channel in contr. RS less pier width Q1 (cfs)1,477 1,368 Q1 = flow in the upstream channel transporting sediment Q2 (cfs)1,700 732 Q2 = flow in contracted channel S1 (ft/ft)0.001689 0.000278 S1 = slope of energy grade line of main channel V*(ft/s)0.57 0.30 V*= shear velocity in the upstream section w (m/s)0.2 0.2 w = fall velocity of bed material (HEC-18, Figure 6.8) w (ft/s)0.66 0.66 V*/w -0.87 0.45 V*/w = See table below k1 -0.64 0.59 k1 = Exponent, see table below y2 (ft)8.03 6.74 y2 = average depth in the contracted section after scour 2.85 1.20 ys = average contraction scour depth V*/w k1 < 0.50 0.59 Mostly contact bed material discharge 0.50-2.0 0.64 Some suspended bed material discharge > 2.0 0.69 Mostly suspended bed material discharge SCOUR DEPTH (ft): LIVE BED EXPONENT TABLE (HEC-18 Sec. 6.3) CONTRACTION SCOUR COMPUTATION Mode of Bed Material Transport VARIABLE STORM EVENT 73 2 232 2 2 =WD QKy m u osyyy−=2 1 2 1 76 1 2 1 2 k/ W W Q Q y y = 2111/)Syg(*V =osyyy−=2 HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition PRESSURE FLOW SCOUR (LIVE BED APPLICATION) Ref. HEC-18, page 6.25, Equations 6.14 & 6.16 NOTES: ys = pressure scour depth (ft) y2 = avg. depth in contracted sect per Eqn. 6.2 (ft) (see live bed analysis for variables) t = separation zone thickness (ft) hb = bridge opening height (ft) ADJUSTED FORMULAS FOR OVERTOPPING: Effective upstream channel flow depth Effective Channel Discharge (6.15) Used as y1 in Eqn 6.2 for overtopping condition Used as Q1 in Eqn 6.2 for overtopping condition EVALUATE y2 100-YR 500-YR NOTES: y2 (ft)8.03 6.74 from previous contraction live bed scour comp. No No Based on HEC-RAS analysis Use 8.03 Use 6.74 hb (ft)6.66 6.66 hb = bridge opening height (low chord to channel invert) T (ft)N/A N/A T = height of the obstruction (girders/deck/parapet) (ft) hue (ft)N/A N/A hue = effective upstream channel flow depth hu (ft)6.03 9.89 hu = upstream channel flow depth (y1 from Eqn. 6.2) Que (cfs)N/A N/A Que = effective channel discharge (overtopping condition) y2 (ft)N/A N/A y2 = recomputed for overtopping ht (ft)-0.63 3.23 ht = dist. from water surface to bridge bottom (hu-hb) hw (ft)0 0 hw = weir flow height (if ht >T use ht - T; if ht ≤ T use 0) t (ft)-2.16 2.46 t = separation zone thickness -0.79 2.54 ys = pressure scour depth Note: BRIDGE DOES NOT OVERTOP DUE TO BUILDING RESTRICTIONS; DO NOT USE SCOUR DEPTH (ft): STORM EVENT Overtopping: Evaluation: PRESSURE FLOW SCOUR (LIVE BED) bshtyy−+=2 1.02.0 2 1**5.0 − − = t w u tb b h h h hh h t 7/8 1 = u ueueh hQQThhbue+= Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1869 Profile: 100 year Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 Profile: 100 year E.G. Elev (ft)25.54 Element Left OB Channel Right OB E.G. US. (ft)25.30 Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS Vel Head (ft)0.34 Wt. n-Val. 0.03 0.04 0.03 W.S. US. (ft)24.65 E.G. Elev (ft)25.07 24.89 W.S. Elev (ft)25.20 Reach Len. (ft)65.00 65.00 65.00 Q Total (cfs)1700.00 W.S. Elev (ft)23.70 23.36 Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft)8.92 298.50 81.35 Q Bridge (cfs)1700.00 Crit W.S. (ft)21.76 21.88 E.G. Slope (ft/ft)0.001689 Area (sq ft)8.92 298.50 131.65 Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft)6.30 5.86 Q Total (cfs)1700.00 Flow (cfs)21.25 1476.58 202.16 Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s)9.40 9.93 Top Width (ft)169.75 Top Width (ft)5.27 49.53 114.95 Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft)180.79 171.25 Vel Total (ft/s)4.37 Avg. Vel. (ft/s)2.38 4.95 2.49 Weir Submerg Froude # Chl 0.66 0.72 Max Chl Dpth (ft)7.49 Hydr. Depth (ft)1.69 6.03 0.71 Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft)1091.79 1042.53 Conv. Total (cfs)41370.40 Conv. (cfs)517.20 35933.40 4919.70 Min El Weir Flow (ft)25.01 Hydr Depth (ft)14.46 10.19 Length Wtd. (ft)65.00 Wetted Per. (ft)7.04 51.17 116.94 Min El Prs (ft)24.06 W.P. Total (ft)66.76 59.96 Min Ch El (ft)17.71 Shear (lb/sq ft)0.13 0.61 0.07 Delta EG (ft)0.72 Conv. Total (cfs)13047.70 12805.50 Alpha 1.15 Stream Power (lb/ft s 0.32 3.04 0.18 Delta WS (ft)1.01 Top Width (ft)12.50 16.81 Frctn Loss (ft)0.15 Cum Volume (acre-ft)0.02 1.25 0.26 BR Open Area (sq ft)179.41 Frctn Loss (ft)0.14 0.01 C & E Loss (ft)0.09 Cum SA (acres)0.01 0.23 0.23 BR Open Vel (ft/s)9.93 C & E Loss (ft)0.05 0.29 BR Sluice Coef Shear Total (lb/sq ft)2.87 3.14 BR Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s)26.99 31.19 Flow Depth US (ft):4.73 (Flow Area/Widt Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1869 Profile: 500 year Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 Profile: 500 year E.G. Elev (ft)29.15 Element Left OB Channel Right OB E.G. US. (ft)29.1 Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS Vel Head (ft)0.1 Wt. n-Val. 0.03 0.04 0.03 W.S. US. (ft)28.92 E.G. Elev (ft)29.00 28.10 W.S. Elev (ft)29.06 Reach Len. (ft)65.00 65.00 65.00 Q Total (cfs)2600 W.S. Elev (ft)28.47 24.84 Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft)71.04 489.86 542.73 Q Bridge (cfs)732.49 Crit W.S. (ft)22.86 22.98 E.G. Slope (ft/ft)0.000278 Area (sq ft)71.04 489.86 593.03 Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft)11.07 7.34 Q Total (cfs)2600 Flow (cfs)79.54 1368.18 1152.27 Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s)5.38 14.49 Top Width (ft)222.39 Top Width (ft)48.97 49.53 123.89 Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft)483.60 179.41 Vel Total (ft/s)2.36 Avg. Vel. (ft/s)1.12 2.79 2.12 Weir Submerg Froude # Chl 0.31 0.94 Max Chl Dpth (ft)11.35 Hydr. Depth (ft)1.45 9.89 4.38 Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft)2422.41 1952.69 Conv. Total (cfs)155911.1 Conv. (cfs)4770.00 82044.10 69097.00 Min El Weir Flow (ft)25.01 Hydr Depth (ft)4.22 Length Wtd. (ft)65 Wetted Per. (ft)55.89 51.17 134.40 Min El Prs (ft)24.06 W.P. Total (ft)200.44 76.86 Min Ch El (ft)17.71 Shear (lb/sq ft)0.02 0.17 0.07 Delta EG (ft)2.25 Conv. Total (cfs)42483.90 11727.40 Alpha 1.11 Stream Power (lb/ft s 0.02 0.46 0.15 Delta WS (ft)2.85 Top Width (ft)114.55 Frctn Loss (ft)0.03 Cum Volume (acre-ft)0.16 1.96 2.11 BR Open Area (sq ft)179.41 Frctn Loss (ft)0.07 0.01 C & E Loss (ft)0.03 Cum SA (acres)0.12 0.23 0.67 BR Open Vel (ft/s)4.08 C & E Loss (ft)0.82 1.24 BR Sluice Coef Shear Total (lb/sq ft)0.56 7.16 BR Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s)3.03 103.8 Flow Depth US (ft):12.65 (Flow Area/Widt Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 BR U Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P.Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft)(ft)(cfs)(sq ft)(ft)Conv Depth(ft)(ft/s)(lb/sq ft)(lb/ft s) 1 Chan 181.07 184.13 8.88 3.21 5.5 0.52 1.36 2.76 0.62 1.71 2 Chan 184.13 187.2 69.09 11.81 6.55 4.06 3.85 5.85 1.91 11.19 3 Chan 187.2 190.27 111.89 15.54 6.31 6.58 5.07 7.2 2.61 18.78 4 Chan 190.27 193.33 143.65 17.89 6.17 8.45 5.83 8.03 3.07 24.66 5 Chan 193.33 196.4 210.23 19.13 4.12 12.37 6.24 10.99 4.92 54.05 6 Chan 196.4 199.47 259.38 19.28 3.07 15.26 6.29 13.45 6.66 89.64 7 Chan 199.47 202.53 255.75 19.13 3.07 15.04 6.24 13.37 6.6 88.25 8 Chan 202.53 205.6 243.45 18.57 3.07 14.32 6.06 13.11 6.41 83.98 9 Chan 205.6 208.67 165.69 17.75 4.89 9.75 5.79 9.33 3.85 35.93 10 Chan 208.67 211.73 113.36 15.57 6.22 6.67 5.08 7.28 2.65 19.32 11 Chan 211.73 214.8 74.35 12.11 6.25 4.37 3.95 6.14 2.05 12.612Chan214.8 217.87 37 8.02 6.35 2.18 2.61 4.61 1.34 6.17 13 Chan 217.87 220.93 7.28 2.79 5.19 0.43 1.31 2.61 0.57 1.49 Avg Hydraulic Depth US (ft):5.18 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1799 BR U Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P.Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft)(ft)(cfs)(sq ft)(ft)Conv Depth(ft)(ft/s)(lb/sq ft)(lb/ft s) 1 LOB 94.93 106.8 5.49 3.21 7.51 0.21 0.45 1.71 0.1 0.17 2 LOB 106.8 118.67 12.39 6.28 11.87 0.48 0.53 1.97 0.12 0.24 3 LOB 118.67 130.53 12.27 5.94 10.47 0.47 0.6 2.07 0.13 0.27 4 LOB 130.53 142.4 0 0 5 LOB 142.4 154.27 0 0 6 LOB 154.27 166.13 0 0 7 LOB 166.13 178 0 0 8 Chan 178 181.07 0 0 9 Chan 181.07 184.13 4.68 3.21 5.5 0.18 1.36 1.46 0.14 0.2 10 Chan 184.13 187.2 36.41 11.81 6.55 1.4 3.85 3.08 0.42 1.3 11 Chan 187.2 190.27 58.96 15.54 6.31 2.27 5.07 3.79 0.58 2.1812Chan190.27 193.33 75.7 17.89 6.17 2.91 5.83 4.23 0.68 2.87 13 Chan 193.33 196.4 86.43 19.35 6.16 3.32 6.31 4.47 0.73 3.28 14 Chan 196.4 199.47 91.91 20.05 6.14 3.53 6.54 4.58 0.76 3.5 15 Chan 199.47 202.53 92.91 20.18 6.14 3.57 6.58 4.6 0.77 3.54 16 Chan 202.53 205.6 87.64 19.5 6.15 3.37 6.36 4.49 0.74 3.3317Chan205.6 208.67 75.6 17.88 6.18 2.91 5.83 4.23 0.68 2.86 18 Chan 208.67 211.73 59.74 15.57 6.22 2.3 5.08 3.84 0.59 2.25 19 Chan 211.73 214.8 39.18 12.11 6.25 1.51 3.95 3.24 0.45 1.47 20 Chan 214.8 217.87 19.5 8.02 6.35 0.75 2.61 2.43 0.3 0.72 21 Chan 217.87 220.93 3.84 2.79 5.19 0.15 1.31 1.38 0.13 0.17 22 Chan 220.93 224 0 0 23 ROB 224 236.5 0 0 24 ROB 236.5 249 0 0 25 ROB 249 261.5 0 0 26 ROB 261.5 274 0 0 27 ROB 274 286.5 0 0 28 ROB 286.5 299 0 0 29 ROB 299 311.5 0 0 30 ROB 311.5 324 0 0 31 ROB 324 337.43 242.92 55.35 16.9 9.34 4.4 4.39 0.77 3.36 32 ROB 337.43 350.86 311.65 66.78 13.72 11.99 4.97 4.67 1.14 5.31 33 ROB 350.86 364.29 316.14 67.56 13.43 12.16 5.03 4.68 1.18 5.534ROB364.29 377.71 316.14 65.35 13.43 12.16 4.87 4.84 1.14 5.5 35 ROB 377.71 391.14 316.14 63.13 13.43 12.16 4.7 5.01 1.1 5.5 36 ROB 391.14 404.57 305.29 57.97 13.81 11.74 4.32 5.27 0.98 5.17 37 ROB 404.57 418 29.07 8.36 6.58 1.12 1.41 3.48 0.3 1.03 Avg Hydraulic Depth US (ft):5.54 HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition COMMENTS: DATE:12/11/2018 SUBMISSION TO PAUL B. BAILEY ARCHITECT, LLC REVISED:N/A - VALUE denotes field entered by user or obtained from back-up spreadsheets VALUE denotes computed field or standard value VALUE denotes sum or conclusion As revised per CTDOT Drainage Manual, Chapter 9, Appendix B ys/ya = 2.27 K1 K2 (L'/ya)0.43 Fr 0.61 + 0.05 Fr = Ve/(gya)1/2 Ve = Qe/Ae LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT K1 -0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 Ø (deg.)90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 K2 -0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 L'(ft)0.69 0.93 0.69 0.93 Ae (ft²)3.76 3.49 6.71 6.25 Qe (cfs)19.21 8.86 21.14 7.26 Ve (ft/s)5.11 2.54 3.15 1.16 ya (ft)5.45 3.75 9.73 6.72 Fr -0.39 0.23 0.18 0.08 1.56 1.05 1.60 0.96 NOTES: K1 = Coefficient for abutment shape (see table)K1 Abutment Shape Ø = Angle of embankment to flow (Figure 8.5, HEC-18) 1.00 vertical-wall K2 = Coefficient embankment angle = (Ø/90)0.13 0.82 vertical-wall with wingwall L'= Length of active flow obstructed by the embankment 0.55 spill-through Ae = Flow area of the approach xsect obstructed by embankment Qe = Flow obstructed by the abutment & approach embankment Ve = Velocity of obstructed flow ya = Ae/L' (Average depth of flow on the floodplain) Fr = Froude Number of approach flow upstream of the abutment FROEHLICH'S ABUTMENT SCOUR VARIABLE STORM EVENT 100-YR 500-YR ABUTMENT: SCOUR DEPTH (ft): TABLE 8.1 HEC-18 HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition Per HEC-18 5th Ed. Section 8.6.3 Compute L/Bf to determine NCHRP Scour Condition LEFT RIGHT NOTES: L 3.76 104.86 L = Projected Length of the Embankment @ RS 1804 Bf 3.76 104.86 Bf = Floodplain Width @ RS 1804 L/Bf 100%100% Projected length of embankment > 75% of the floodplain width, compute using Live Bed condition (a) ymax = αayc or ymax = αbyc ys = ymax - y₀ yc = y1 *(q2c ÷ q1)6/7 100-YR 500-YR NOTES: LIVE CLEAR y1 (ft)6.03 9.89 y1 = upstream flow depth (see contraction comp.) W1 (ft)49.53 49.53 W1 = width upstream main channel (see contraction comp.) W2 (ft)38.24 38.24 W2 = width bridge opening (see contraction comp.) Q1 (cfs)1,477 1,368 Q1 = flow in the upstream channel (see contraction comp.) Q2 (cfs)1,700 732 Q2 = total discharge in bridge (see contraction comp.) q1 (ft²/s)29.81 27.62 q1 = upstream unit discharge (Q1/W1) q2c (ft²/s)44.46 19.16 q2c = unit discharge in constricted opening (Q2/W2) q2c ÷ q1 1.49 0.69 yc (ft)8.49 7.23 yc = flow depth including contraction scour αa 1.6 N/A = See Figure 8.10 for wingwall abutments (live)αb N/A 1 = See Figure 8.12 for wingwall abutments (clear) ymax (ft)13.59 7.23 = max. flow depth resulting from abutment scour yo (ft)5.18 5.54 yo = flow depth prior to scour 8.41 1.69 ys = average contraction scour depthSCOUR DEPTH (ft): VARIABLE STORM EVENT NCHRP 24-20 ABUTMENT SCOUR CONTRACTION Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1804 Profile: 100 yearPosLeft Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P.Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft)(ft)(cfs)(sq ft)(ft)Conv Depth(ft)(ft/s)(lb/sq ft)(lb/ft s) 1 Chan 178.00 181.07 7.26 4.23 4.89 0.43 3.96 1.72 0.18 0.302Chan181.07 184.13 85.18 16.68 3.77 5.01 5.44 5.11 0.91 4.63 Abutment at 181.76 3 Chan 184.13 187.20 145.15 21.68 3.27 8.54 7.07 6.69 1.36 9.114Chan187.20 190.27 155.18 22.01 3.07 9.13 7.18 7.05 1.47 10.37 5 Chan 190.27 193.33 155.92 22.08 3.07 9.17 7.20 7.06 1.48 10.42 6 Chan 193.33 196.40 156.66 22.14 3.07 9.22 7.22 7.08 1.48 10.477Chan196.40 199.47 157.40 22.20 3.07 9.26 7.24 7.09 1.48 10.528Chan199.47 202.53 155.46 22.05 3.07 9.14 7.19 7.05 1.47 10.379Chan202.53 205.60 148.97 21.50 3.07 8.76 7.01 6.93 1.43 9.94 10 Chan 205.60 208.67 142.51 20.93 3.07 8.38 6.83 6.81 1.40 9.50 11 Chan 208.67 211.73 134.36 20.24 3.09 7.90 6.60 6.64 1.34 8.9212Chan211.73 214.80 120.32 18.97 3.10 7.08 6.19 6.34 1.25 7.9613Chan214.80 217.87 106.46 17.63 3.10 6.26 5.75 6.04 1.17 7.0414Chan217.87 220.93 29.16 11.47 7.38 1.72 5.38 2.54 0.32 0.81 Abutment (Obstruction) at 220.00 15 Chan 220.93 224.00 0.00 0.00 16 ROB 224.00 236.50 0.00 0.0017ROB236.50 249.00 0.00 0.0018ROB249.00 261.50 0.00 0.0019ROB261.50 274.00 0.00 0.00 20 ROB 274.00 286.50 0.00 0.00 21 ROB 286.50 299.00 0.00 0.0022ROB299.00 311.50 0.00 0.0023ROB311.50 324.00 0.00 0.0024ROB324.00 337.43 0.00 7.42 13.08 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.12 0.00 25 ROB 337.43 350.86 0.00 15.57 13.72 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.23 0.00 26 ROB 350.86 364.29 0.00 16.35 13.43 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.25 0.0027ROB364.29 377.71 0.00 14.13 13.43 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.22 0.0028ROB377.71 391.14 0.00 11.91 13.43 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.18 0.0029ROB391.14 404.57 0.00 7.83 11.46 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.14 0.00 LEFT ABUTMENT VARIABLES RIGHT ABUTMENT VARIABLESLeft Floodplain Denoted As:Right Floodplain Denoted As: Obstructed Embankment (L')0.69 =Left Flood. Sta. - L Abut. Sta.Obstructed Embankment (L')0.93 =Right Floodplain Sta. - R Abutment Sta. Obstructed Subsection No 2 Obstructed Subsection No 14L Sta 181.07 R Sta 220.93L Abutment Sta 181.76 R Abutment Sta 220R Sta 184.13 L' Sta 217.87 % Obstructed 22.55%= in Subsection % Obstructed 30.39%= in Subsection Subsection Ae 3.76 = % Obstructed x Flow Subsection Subsection Ae 3.49 = % Obstructed x Flow SubsectionSubsection Qe 19.21 = % Obstructed x Area Subsection Subsection Qe 8.86 = % Obstructed x Area Subsection Ae 3.76 = Flood. Area + Subsection Ae Ae 3.49 = Flood. Area + Subsection AeQe19.21 = Flood. Flow + Subsection Qe Qe 8.86 = Flood. Flow + Subsection Qe <1% CONVEYANCE Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1804 Profile: 500 yearPosLeft Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P.Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft)(ft)(cfs)(sq ft)(ft)Conv Depth(ft)(ft/s)(lb/sq ft)(lb/ft s) 1 LOB 94.93 106.80 7.10 6.98 9.86 0.27 0.74 1.02 0.03 0.03 2 LOB 106.80 118.67 14.76 11.66 11.87 0.57 0.98 1.27 0.04 0.053LOB118.67 130.53 12.92 10.41 10.93 0.50 1.05 1.24 0.04 0.054LOB130.53 142.40 0.00 0.00 5 LOB 142.40 154.27 0.00 0.006LOB154.27 166.13 0.00 0.007LOB166.13 178.00 0.00 0.008Chan178.00 181.07 6.78 8.78 9.16 0.26 8.23 0.77 0.04 0.039Chan181.07 184.13 93.76 29.76 3.77 3.61 9.71 3.15 0.34 1.06 Abutment at 181.76 10 Chan 184.13 187.20 133.68 34.77 3.27 5.14 11.34 3.84 0.45 1.7511Chan187.20 190.27 141.58 35.10 3.07 5.45 11.44 4.03 0.49 1.9712Chan190.27 193.33 142.01 35.16 3.07 5.46 11.47 4.04 0.49 1.9713Chan193.33 196.40 142.43 35.22 3.07 5.48 11.49 4.04 0.49 1.9814Chan196.40 199.47 142.85 35.29 3.07 5.49 11.51 4.05 0.49 1.99 15 Chan 199.47 202.53 141.69 35.13 3.07 5.45 11.46 4.03 0.49 1.9716Chan202.53 205.60 137.96 34.58 3.07 5.31 11.28 3.99 0.48 1.9117Chan205.60 208.67 134.22 34.02 3.07 5.16 11.09 3.95 0.47 1.8618Chan208.67 211.73 129.32 33.33 3.09 4.97 10.87 3.88 0.46 1.7919Chan211.73 214.80 120.92 32.06 3.10 4.65 10.45 3.77 0.44 1.66 20 Chan 214.80 217.87 112.59 30.71 3.10 4.33 10.02 3.67 0.42 1.5521Chan217.87 220.93 23.88 20.57 11.65 0.92 9.64 1.16 0.08 0.09 Abutment (Obstruction) at 220.0022Chan220.93 224.00 0.00 0.0023ROB224.00 236.50 0.00 0.0024ROB236.50 249.00 0.00 0.00 25 ROB 249.00 261.50 0.00 0.0026ROB261.50 274.00 0.00 0.0027ROB274.00 286.50 0.00 0.0028ROB286.50 299.00 0.00 0.0029ROB299.00 311.50 0.00 0.00 30 ROB 311.50 324.00 0.00 0.0031ROB324.00 337.43 124.73 61.05 17.35 4.80 4.86 2.04 0.15 0.3132ROB337.43 350.86 162.87 72.86 13.72 6.26 5.43 2.24 0.23 0.5133ROB350.86 364.29 165.22 73.65 13.43 6.35 5.48 2.24 0.23 0.5234ROB364.29 377.71 165.22 71.43 13.43 6.35 5.32 2.31 0.23 0.52 35 ROB 377.71 391.14 165.22 69.21 13.43 6.35 5.15 2.39 0.22 0.5236ROB391.14 404.57 159.85 64.06 13.81 6.15 4.77 2.50 0.20 0.4937ROB404.57 418.00 18.44 11.27 7.64 0.71 1.63 1.64 0.06 0.10 LEFT ABUTMENT VARIABLES RIGHT ABUTMENT VARIABLES Left Floodplain Denoted As:Right Floodplain Denoted As: Obstructed Embankment (L')0.69 =Left Floodplain Sta. - L Abutment Sta.Obstructed Embankment (L')0.93 =Right Floodplain Sta. - R Abutment Sta. Obstructed Subsection No 9 Obstructed Subsection No 21 L Sta 181.07 R Sta 220.93L Abutment Sta 181.76 R Abutment Sta 220 R Sta 184.13 L' Sta 217.87% Obstructed 22.55%= in Subsection % Obstructed 30.39%= in Subsection Subsection Ae 6.71 = % Obstructed x Flow Subsection Subsection Ae 6.25 = % Obstructed x Flow SubsectionSubsection Qe 21.14 = % Obstructed x Area Subsection Subsection Qe 7.26 = % Obstructed x Area Subsection Ae 6.71 = Flood. Area + Subsection Ae Ae 6.25 = Flood. Area + Subsection AeQe21.14 = Flood. Flow + Subsection Qe Qe 7.26 = Flood. Flow + Subsection Qe <1% CONVEYANCE HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition COMMENTS: DATE:12/11/2018 SUBMISSION TO PAUL B. BAILEY ARCHITECT, LLC REVISED:N/A - VALUE denotes field entered by user or obtained from back-up spreadsheets VALUE denotes computed field or standard value VALUE denotes sum or conclusion LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT 100-YR 2.85 N/A 1.85 5.30 4.69 4.69 8.15 500-YR 8.61 8.46 3.99 6.15 13.20 12.60 14.76 NOTE:Live Bed + Froechlich's Abutment HEC-RAS MODEL DATA (BRIDGE NO. 03966 PINK ROW OVER OXOBOXO BROOK) FILE:OXOBOXO_SCOUR.prj XS #1734 PLAN:Proposed Flow 100-YR:1700 CFS XS #1684 500-YR:2600 CFS XS #1672 BR U CRITICAL VELOCITY Ref. HEC-18, page 6.2, Equation 6.1 If Vc is less than V upstream of the contraction → Live-Bed Scour If Vc is greater than V upstream of the contraction → Clear-Water Scour 100-YR 500-YR NOTES: Ku 11.17 11.17 Ku = coefficient (English Units) y (ft)5.38 8.53 y1 = average depth in upstream main channel D50 (mm)2.20 2.20 D50 (in)0.087 0.087 D50 (ft)0.007 0.007 Vc (ft/s)2.9 3.1 V (ft/s)7.49 5.70 V =main channel velocity LIVE LIVE SCOUR SUMMARY FROEHLICH'S TOTALNCHRP 24-20STORM CONTRACTION SCOUR DETERMINATION VARIABLE STORM EVENT SCOUR TYPE: LIVE PRES. FLOW NOTE: ORIGINAL HEC-RAS FILE DEVELOPED BY BSC GROUP AS PART OF CTDEEP FMC SUBMISSION DATED 10/2017. YRC ADDED FLOW DISTRIBUTIONS TO ALLOW FOR SCOUR ANALYSIS. NO MODIFICATION TO THE GEOMETRY & FLOWS OCCURRED. ()31 5061DyKVuc= HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition LIVE-BED CONTRACTION CLEAR WATER CONTRACTION Ref. HEC-18, page 6.10, Equations 6.2 and 6.3 Ref. HEC-18, page 6.12, Equations 6.4 and 6.5 100-YR 500-YR NOTES: Ku -0.0077 0.0077 Ku = coefficient (English Units) Dm (ft)0.009 0.009 Dm = 1.25 D50 y1 (ft)5.38 8.53 y1 = average depth in upstream main channel yo (ft)4.57 5.81 yo = average existing depth in the contracted section W1 (ft)40.00 40.00 W1 = bottom width upstream main channel W2 (ft)26.00 26.00 W2 = bottom width main channel in contr. RS less pier width Q1 (cfs)1,613 1,943 Q1 = flow in the upstream channel transporting sediment Q2 (cfs)1,700 2,600 Q2 = flow in contracted channel S1 (ft/ft)0.004478 0.001402 S1 = slope of energy grade line of main channel V*(ft/s)0.88 0.62 V*= shear velocity in the upstream section w (m/s)0.2 0.2 w = fall velocity of bed material (HEC-18, Figure 6.8) w (ft/s)0.66 0.66 V*/w -1.34 0.95 V*/w = See table below k1 -0.64 0.64 k1 = Exponent, see table below y2 (ft)7.42 14.42 y2 = average depth in the contracted section after scour 2.85 8.61 ys = average contraction scour depth V*/w k1 < 0.50 0.59 Mostly contact bed material discharge 0.50-2.0 0.64 Some suspended bed material discharge > 2.0 0.69 Mostly suspended bed material discharge Mode of Bed Material Transport VARIABLE STORM EVENT CONTRACTION SCOUR COMPUTATION SCOUR DEPTH (ft): LIVE BED EXPONENT TABLE (HEC-18 Sec. 6.3) 73 2 232 2 2 =WD QKy m u osyyy−=2 1 2 1 76 1 2 1 2 k/ W W Q Q y y = 2111/)Syg(*V =osyyy−=2 HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition PRESSURE FLOW SCOUR (LIVE BED APPLICATION) Ref. HEC-18, page 6.25, Equations 6.14 & 6.16 NOTES: ys = pressure scour depth (ft) y2 = avg. depth in contracted sect per Eqn. 6.2 (ft) (see live bed analysis for variables) t = separation zone thickness (ft) hb = bridge opening height (ft) ADJUSTED FORMULAS FOR OVERTOPPING: Effective upstream channel flow depth Effective Channel Discharge (6.15) Used as y1 in Eqn 6.2 for overtopping condition Used as Q1 in Eqn 6.2 for overtopping condition EVALUATE y2 100-YR 500-YR NOTES: y2 (ft)7.42 14.42 from previous contraction live bed scour comp. No Yes Based on HEC-RAS analysis Use 7.42 Adjust hb (ft)N/A 7.60 hb = bridge opening height (low chord to channel invert) T (ft)N/A 2.00 T = height of the obstruction (girders/deck/parapet) (ft) hue (ft)N/A 9.60 hue = effective upstream channel flow depth hu (ft)5.38 8.53 hu = upstream channel flow depth (y1 from Eqn. 6.2) Que (cfs)N/A 2224 Que = effective channel discharge (overtopping condition) y2 (ft)N/A 13.67 y2 = recomputed for overtopping ht (ft)#VALUE!0.93 ht = dist. from water surface to bridge bottom (hu-hb) hw (ft)#VALUE!0 hw = weir flow height (if ht >T use ht - T; if ht ≤ T use 0) t (ft)#VALUE!2.38 t = separation zone thickness #VALUE!8.46 ys = pressure scour depth Note: NO OVERTOPPING & MODEL EVALUATED UNDER ENERGY ONLY; DO NOT USE SCOUR DEPTH (ft): STORM EVENT Overtopping: Evaluation: PRESSURE FLOW SCOUR (LIVE BED) bshtyy−+=2 1.02.0 2 1**5.0 − − = t w u tb b h h h hh h t 7/8 1 = u ueueh hQQThhbue+= Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1734 Profile: 100 year Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 Profile: 100 year E.G. Elev (ft)23.82 Element Left OB Channel Right OB E.G. US. (ft)23.41 Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS Vel Head (ft)0.85 Wt. n-Val. 0.03 0.04 0.03 W.S. US. (ft)22.14 E.G. Elev (ft)23.08 22.23 W.S. Elev (ft)22.98 Reach Len. (ft)50.00 50.00 50.00 Q Total (cfs)1700.00 W.S. Elev (ft)20.76 21.09 Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft)14.69 215.31 6.14 Q Bridge (cfs)1700.00 Crit W.S. (ft)20.76 19.50 E.G. Slope (ft/ft)0.004478 Area (sq ft)14.69 215.31 6.14 Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft)5.46 6.09 Q Total (cfs)1700.00 Flow (cfs)74.66 1612.75 12.59 Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s)12.23 8.53 Top Width (ft)55.58 Top Width (ft)3.00 40.00 12.58 Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft)139.00 199.20 Vel Total (ft/s)7.20 Avg. Vel. (ft/s)5.08 7.49 2.05 Weir Submerg Froude # Chl 0.92 0.61 Max Chl Dpth (ft)7.18 Hydr. Depth (ft)4.90 5.38 0.49 Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft)970.71 1035.24 Conv. Total (cfs)25404.50 Conv. (cfs)1115.80 24100.60 188.10 Min El Weir Flow (ft)24.01 Hydr Depth (ft)4.64 6.64 Length Wtd. (ft)50.00 Wetted Per. (ft)7.74 41.16 12.62 Min El Prs (ft)22.90 W.P. Total (ft)38.72 51.86 Min Ch El (ft)15.80 Shear (lb/sq ft)0.53 1.46 0.14 Delta EG (ft)1.44 Conv. Total (cfs)12105.20 24200.50 Alpha 1.05 Stream Power (lb/ft s 2.70 10.95 0.28 Delta WS (ft)0.80 Top Width (ft)29.94 29.99 Frctn Loss (ft)0.29 Cum Volume (acre-ft)0.01 0.52 0.10 BR Open Area (sq ft)197.78 Frctn Loss (ft)0.19 0.00 C & E Loss (ft)0.13 Cum SA (acres)0.00 0.11 0.06 BR Open Vel (ft/s)12.23 C & E Loss (ft)0.60 0.25 BR Sluice Coef Shear Total (lb/sq ft)4.42 1.18 BR Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s)54.06 10.10 Flow Depth US (ft):5.35 (Flow Area/Width) Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1734 Profile: 500 year Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 Profile: 500 year E.G. Elev (ft)26.52 Element Left OB Channel Right OB E.G. US. (ft)26.37 Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS Vel Head (ft)0.4 Wt. n-Val. 0.03 0.04 0.03 W.S. US. (ft)26.16 E.G. Elev (ft)25.43 24.27 W.S. Elev (ft)26.12 Reach Len. (ft)50.00 50.00 50.00 Q Total (cfs)2600 W.S. Elev (ft)22.10 22.35 Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft)24.13 341.16 256.46 Q Bridge (cfs)2600 Crit W.S. (ft)22.10 20.71 E.G. Slope (ft/ft)0.001402 Area (sq ft)24.13 341.16 447.41 Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft)6.80 7.35 Q Total (cfs)2600 Flow (cfs)76.09 1943.37 580.54 Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s)14.65 11.09 Top Width (ft)231.9 Top Width (ft)3.00 40.00 188.90 Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft)177.52 234.39 Vel Total (ft/s)4.18 Avg. Vel. (ft/s)3.15 5.70 2.26 Weir Submerg Froude # Chl 0.99 0.72 Max Chl Dpth (ft)10.32 Hydr. Depth (ft)8.04 8.53 1.36 Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft)1721.40 1754.70 Conv. Total (cfs)69439.7 Conv. (cfs)2032.10 51902.70 15504.80 Min El Weir Flow (ft)24.01 Hydr Depth (ft)6.66 9.08 Length Wtd. (ft)50 Wetted Per. (ft)10.89 41.16 190.19 Min El Prs (ft)22.9 W.P. Total (ft)43.48 56.74 Min Ch El (ft)15.8 Shear (lb/sq ft)0.19 0.73 0.12 Delta EG (ft)2.69 Conv. Total (cfs)16844.80 29888.20 Alpha 1.47 Stream Power (lb/ft s 0.61 4.13 0.27 Delta WS (ft)3.24 Top Width (ft)26.65 25.81 Frctn Loss (ft)0.05 Cum Volume (acre-ft)0.07 0.80 0.78 BR Open Area (sq ft)197.78 Frctn Loss (ft)0.27 0.00 C & E Loss (ft)0.09 Cum SA (acres)0.06 0.11 0.29 BR Open Vel (ft/s)14.65 C & E Loss (ft)0.71 0.58 BR Sluice Coef Shear Total (lb/sq ft)6.07 1.95 BR Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s)88.93 21.65 Flow Depth US (ft):7.10 (Flow Area/Width) Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 BR U Profile: 100 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P.Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft)(ft)(cfs)(sq ft)(ft)Conv Depth(ft)(ft/s)(lb/sq ft)(lb/ft s) 1 Chan 185 187.27 7.02 1.9 2.64 0.41 1.16 3.69 0.89 3.28 2 Chan 187.27 189.53 52.97 6.45 2.69 3.12 2.84 8.22 2.95 24.26 3 Chan 189.53 191.8 92.45 8.66 2.44 5.44 3.82 10.67 4.37 46.63 4 Chan 191.8 194.07 131.1 10.55 2.36 7.71 4.65 12.43 5.49 68.27 5 Chan 194.07 196.33 150.25 11.28 2.28 8.84 4.98 13.32 6.1 81.21 6 Chan 196.33 198.6 161.84 11.79 2.28 9.52 5.2 13.73 6.37 87.47 7 Chan 198.6 200.87 172.44 12.24 2.28 10.14 5.4 14.08 6.63 93.31 8 Chan 200.87 203.13 168.76 12.08 2.27 9.93 5.33 13.97 6.55 91.48 9 Chan 203.13 205.4 161.21 11.75 2.27 9.48 5.18 13.72 6.37 87.39 10 Chan 205.4 207.67 153.81 11.42 2.27 9.05 5.04 13.46 6.19 83.38 11 Chan 207.67 209.93 146.54 11.1 2.27 8.62 4.9 13.21 6.02 79.44 12 Chan 209.93 212.2 134.19 10.61 2.32 7.89 4.68 12.65 5.64 71.3113Chan212.2 214.47 105.89 9.27 2.36 6.23 4.09 11.43 4.84 55.3 14 Chan 214.47 216.73 53.41 7.38 3.73 3.14 3.26 7.23 2.44 17.64 15 Chan 216.73 219 8.12 2.52 4.27 0.48 1.63 3.22 0.73 2.34 Avg Hydraulic Depth US (ft):4.57 Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1672 BR U Profile: 500 year Pos Left Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P.Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft)(ft)(cfs)(sq ft)(ft)Conv Depth(ft)(ft/s)(lb/sq ft)(lb/ft s)1 Chan 185 187.27 16.12 3.88 4.79 0.62 2.02 4.16 1.2 5 2 Chan 187.27 189.53 105.45 9.5 2.69 4.06 4.19 11.11 5.25 58.34 3 Chan 189.53 191.8 159.53 11.71 2.44 6.14 5.17 13.62 7.14 97.2 4 Chan 191.8 194.07 208.98 13.6 2.36 8.04 6 15.37 8.55 131.46 5 Chan 194.07 196.33 233.74 14.33 2.28 8.99 6.32 16.32 9.35 152.62 6 Chan 196.33 198.6 247.88 14.84 2.28 9.53 6.55 16.7 9.69 161.85 7 Chan 198.6 200.87 260.8 15.29 2.28 10.03 6.75 17.05 10 170.47 8 Chan 200.87 203.13 256.39 15.13 2.27 9.86 6.67 16.95 9.9 167.99Chan203.13 205.4 247.22 14.8 2.27 9.51 6.53 16.71 9.69 161.89 10 Chan 205.4 207.67 238.19 14.47 2.27 9.16 6.38 16.46 9.48 155.98 11 Chan 207.67 209.93 229.28 14.14 2.27 8.82 6.24 16.21 9.26 150.15 12 Chan 209.93 212.2 213.44 13.66 2.32 8.21 6.03 15.63 8.77 137.02 13 Chan 212.2 214.47 124.88 11.92 3.69 4.8 5.26 10.47 4.81 50.36 14 Chan 214.47 216.73 49.61 7.74 5 1.91 3.42 6.41 2.3 14.75 15 Chan 216.73 219 8.48 2.52 4.27 0.33 1.63 3.37 0.88 2.95 Avg Hydraulic Depth US (ft):5.81 HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition COMMENTS: DATE:12/11/2018 SUBMISSION TO PAUL B. BAILEY ARCHITECT, LLC REVISED:N/A - VALUE denotes field entered by user or obtained from back-up spreadsheets VALUE denotes computed field or standard value VALUE denotes sum or conclusion As revised per CTDOT Drainage Manual, Chapter 9, Appendix B ys/ya = 2.27 K1 K2 (L'/ya)0.43 Fr 0.61 + 0.05 Fr = Ve/(gya)1/2 Ve = Qe/Ae LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT K1 -0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Ø (deg.)90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 K2 -0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 L'(ft)2.00 1.47 2.00 1.47 Ae (ft²)4.10 26.57 20.73 78.84 Qe (cfs)13.00 185.33 100.41 231.85 Ve (ft/s)3.17 6.98 4.84 2.94 ya (ft)2.05 18.07 10.37 53.63 Fr -0.39 0.29 0.27 0.07 1.85 5.30 3.99 6.15 NOTES: K1 = Coefficient for abutment shape (see table)K1 Abutment Shape Ø = Angle of embankment to flow (Figure 8.5, HEC-18) 1.00 vertical-wall K2 = Coefficient embankment angle = (Ø/90)0.13 0.82 vertical-wall with wingwall L'= Length of active flow obstructed by the embankment 0.55 spill-through Ae = Flow area of the approach xsect obstructed by embankment Qe = Flow obstructed by the abutment & approach embankment Ve = Velocity of obstructed flow ya = Ae/L' (Average depth of flow on the floodplain) Fr = Froude Number of approach flow upstream of the abutment VARIABLE STORM EVENT 100-YR 500-YR ABUTMENT: SCOUR DEPTH (ft): TABLE 8.1 HEC-18 FROEHLICH'S ABUTMENT SCOUR HEC-18 SCOUR COMPUTATIONS Based on the CTDOT Drainage Manual and HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 5th edition Per HEC-18 5th Ed. Section 8.6.3 Compute L/Bf to determine NCHRP Scour Condition LEFT RIGHT NOTES: L 41.16 228 L = Projected Length of the Embankment @ RS 1684 Bf 41.16 228 Bf = Floodplain Width @ RS 1684 L/Bf 100%100% Projected length of embankment > 75% of the floodplain width, compute using Live Bed condition (a) ymax = αayc or ymax = αbyc ys = ymax - y₀ yc = y1 *(q2c ÷ q1)6/7 100-YR 500-YR NOTES: LIVE LIVE y1 (ft)5.38 8.53 y1 = upstream flow depth (see contraction comp.) W1 (ft)40.00 40.00 W1 = width upstream main channel (see contraction comp.) W2 (ft)26.00 26.00 W2 = width bridge opening (see contraction comp.) Q1 (cfs)1,613 1,943 Q1 = flow in the upstream channel (see contraction comp.) Q2 (cfs)1,700 2,600 Q2 = total discharge in bridge (see contraction comp.) q1 (ft²/s)40.32 48.58 q1 = upstream unit discharge (Q1/W1) q2c (ft²/s)65.38 100.00 q2c = unit discharge in constricted opening (Q2/W2) q2c ÷ q1 1.62 2.06 yc (ft)8.14 15.84 yc = flow depth including contraction scour αa 1.45 1.2 = See Figure 8.10 for wingwall abutments (live)αb N/A N/A = See Figure 8.12 for wingwall abutments (clear) ymax (ft)11.81 19.00 = max. flow depth resulting from abutment scour yo (ft)4.57 5.81 yo = flow depth prior to scour 7.24 13.20 ys = average contraction scour depthSCOUR DEPTH (ft): VARIABLE STORM EVENT NCHRP 24-20 ABUTMENT SCOUR CONTRACTION Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1684 Profile: 100 yearPosLeft Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P.Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft)(ft)(cfs)(sq ft)(ft)Conv Depth(ft)(ft/s)(lb/sq ft)(lb/ft s) 1 LOB 172.67 185.00 0.00 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.07 0.17 0.02 0.002Chan185.00 187.27 14.75 4.65 4.03 0.87 2.05 3.18 0.54 1.72 Abutment at 187 3 Chan 187.27 189.53 64.50 9.58 2.69 3.79 4.23 6.73 1.67 11.254Chan189.53 191.80 97.31 11.80 2.44 5.72 5.20 8.25 2.26 18.68 5 Chan 191.80 194.07 127.27 13.68 2.36 7.49 6.04 9.30 2.71 25.23 6 Chan 194.07 196.33 142.27 14.41 2.28 8.37 6.36 9.87 2.97 29.287Chan196.33 198.60 150.83 14.92 2.28 8.87 6.58 10.11 3.07 31.048Chan198.60 200.87 158.64 15.38 2.28 9.33 6.78 10.32 3.17 32.689Chan200.87 203.13 155.98 15.21 2.27 9.18 6.71 10.26 3.14 32.19 10 Chan 203.13 205.40 150.43 14.88 2.27 8.85 6.57 10.11 3.07 31.05 11 Chan 205.40 207.67 144.96 14.56 2.27 8.53 6.42 9.96 3.00 29.9212Chan207.67 209.93 139.58 14.23 2.27 8.21 6.28 9.81 2.94 28.8113Chan209.93 212.20 129.97 13.74 2.32 7.65 6.06 9.46 2.78 26.3014Chan212.20 214.47 108.26 12.40 2.36 6.37 5.47 8.73 2.47 21.53 Abutment at 213 15 Chan 214.47 216.73 87.76 10.93 2.36 5.16 4.82 8.03 2.17 17.45 16 Chan 216.73 219.00 27.46 7.61 5.44 1.62 3.36 3.61 0.66 2.3717ROB219.00 224.55 0.03 0.04 0.58 0.00 0.07 0.71 0.03 0.02 <1% CONVEYANCE18ROB224.55 239.30 0.00 0.0019ROB239.30 254.04 0.00 0.28 1.79 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.07 0.00 20 ROB 254.04 268.79 0.00 18.56 14.85 0.00 1.26 0.00 0.59 0.00 21 ROB 268.79 283.54 0.00 31.41 14.75 0.00 2.13 0.00 1.00 0.0022ROB283.54 298.28 0.00 31.52 14.75 0.00 2.14 0.00 1.00 0.0023ROB298.28 313.03 0.00 31.52 14.75 0.00 2.14 0.00 1.00 0.0024ROB313.03 327.78 0.00 31.52 14.75 0.00 2.14 0.00 1.00 0.00 25 ROB 327.78 342.52 0.00 17.59 12.56 0.00 1.43 0.00 0.66 0.00 LEFT ABUTMENT VARIABLES RIGHT ABUTMENT VARIABLESLeft Floodplain Denoted As:Right Floodplain Denoted As: Obstructed Embankment (L')2.00 =Left Flood. Sta. - L Abut. Sta.Obstructed Embankment (L')1.47 =Right Floodplain Sta. - R Abutment Sta. Obstructed Subsection No 2 Obstructed Subsection No 14L Sta 185.00 R Sta 214.47L Abutment Sta 187 R Abutment Sta 213 R Sta 187.27 L' Sta 212.20 % Obstructed 88.11%= in Subsection % Obstructed 64.76%= in Subsection Subsection Ae 4.10 = % Obstructed x Flow Subsection Subsection Ae 8.03 = % Obstructed x Flow SubsectionSubsection Qe 13.00 = % Obstructed x Area Subsection Subsection Qe 70.11 = % Obstructed x Area Subsection Ae 4.10 = Flood. Area + Subsection Ae Ae 26.57 = Flood. Area + Subsection AeQe13.00 = Flood. Flow + Subsection Qe Qe 185.33 = Flood. Flow + Subsection Qe <1% CONVEYANCE Plan: Pro Flow OXOBOXO BROOK OXOBOXO BROOK RS: 1684 Profile: 500 yearPosLeft Sta Right Sta Flow Area W.P.Percent Hydr Velocity Shear Power (ft)(ft)(cfs)(sq ft)(ft)Conv Depth(ft)(ft/s)(lb/sq ft)(lb/ft s) 1 LOB 135.67 148.00 0.14 1.42 9.54 0.01 0.15 0.10 0.01 0.00 2 LOB 148.00 160.33 1.84 7.36 12.36 0.07 0.60 0.25 0.03 0.013LOB160.33 172.67 6.77 16.06 12.35 0.26 1.30 0.42 0.07 0.034LOB172.67 185.00 15.31 26.89 13.18 0.59 2.18 0.57 0.11 0.06 5 Chan 185.00 187.27 31.91 13.77 4.03 1.23 6.07 2.32 0.19 0.43 Abutment at 1876Chan187.27 189.53 69.58 18.70 2.69 2.68 8.25 3.72 0.38 1.417Chan189.53 191.80 89.43 20.92 2.44 3.44 9.23 4.28 0.47 2.008Chan191.80 194.07 105.48 22.80 2.36 4.06 10.06 4.63 0.53 2.439Chan194.07 196.33 113.96 23.53 2.28 4.38 10.38 4.84 0.56 2.73 10 Chan 196.33 198.60 118.14 24.05 2.28 4.54 10.61 4.91 0.58 2.8311Chan198.60 200.87 121.96 24.50 2.28 4.69 10.81 4.98 0.59 2.9212Chan200.87 203.13 120.73 24.33 2.27 4.64 10.73 4.96 0.58 2.9013Chan203.13 205.40 118.04 24.01 2.27 4.54 10.59 4.92 0.58 2.8314Chan205.40 207.67 115.37 23.68 2.27 4.44 10.45 4.87 0.57 2.77 15 Chan 207.67 209.93 112.73 23.35 2.27 4.34 10.30 4.83 0.56 2.7016Chan209.93 212.20 107.40 22.86 2.32 4.13 10.09 4.70 0.54 2.5317Chan212.20 214.47 95.99 21.52 2.36 3.69 9.50 4.46 0.50 2.22 Abutment at 21318Chan214.47 216.73 85.33 20.05 2.36 3.28 8.85 4.25 0.46 1.9719Chan216.73 219.00 36.12 16.73 5.44 1.39 7.38 2.16 0.17 0.36 20 ROB 219.00 224.55 63.61 19.38 5.71 2.45 3.49 3.28 0.18 0.6121ROB224.55 238.31 72.25 35.02 13.78 2.78 2.54 2.06 0.14 0.2922ROB238.31 252.08 71.81 40.37 13.90 2.76 2.93 1.78 0.16 0.2823ROB252.08 265.84 71.87 68.75 13.89 2.76 5.00 1.05 0.27 0.2824ROB265.84 279.60 72.23 83.89 13.78 2.78 6.09 0.86 0.33 0.29 25 ROB 279.60 293.37 72.30 84.81 13.76 2.78 6.16 0.85 0.34 0.2926ROB293.37 307.13 72.30 84.81 13.76 2.78 6.16 0.85 0.34 0.2927ROB307.13 320.89 72.30 84.81 13.76 2.78 6.16 0.85 0.34 0.2928ROB320.89 334.66 71.95 83.90 13.86 2.77 6.10 0.86 0.33 0.2829ROB334.66 348.42 70.84 50.77 14.19 2.72 3.69 1.40 0.19 0.27 30 ROB 348.42 362.18 72.27 32.28 13.77 2.78 2.35 2.24 0.13 0.2931ROB362.18 375.95 71.55 41.55 13.98 2.75 3.02 1.72 0.16 0.2832ROB375.95 389.71 72.30 44.28 13.76 2.78 3.22 1.63 0.18 0.2933ROB389.71 403.47 70.38 41.15 14.33 2.71 2.99 1.71 0.16 0.2734ROB403.47 417.24 72.27 36.26 13.77 2.78 2.63 1.99 0.14 0.29 LEFT ABUTMENT VARIABLES RIGHT ABUTMENT VARIABLES Left Floodplain Denoted As:Right Floodplain Denoted As: Obstructed Embankment (L')2.00 =Left Floodplain Sta. - L Abutment Sta.Obstructed Embankment (L')1.47 =Right Floodplain Sta. - R Abutment Sta. Obstructed Subsection No 5 Obstructed Subsection No 21 L Sta 185.00 R Sta 214.47L Abutment Sta 187 R Abutment Sta 213R Sta 187.27 L' Sta 212.20% Obstructed 88.11%= in Subsection % Obstructed 64.76%= in SubsectionSubsection Ae 20.73 = % Obstructed x Flow Subsection Subsection Ae 22.68 = % Obstructed x Flow Subsection Subsection Qe 100.41 = % Obstructed x Area Subsection Subsection Qe 46.79 = % Obstructed x Area Subsection Ae 20.73 = Flood. Area + Subsection Ae Ae 78.84 = Flood. Area + Subsection AeQe100.41 = Flood. Flow + Subsection Qe Qe 231.85 = Flood. Flow + Subsection Qe <1% CONVEYANCE NOT CONSIDERED; AREA OF INEFFECTIVE FLOW PER MODEL OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT 42 PINK ROW UNCASVILLE, CONNECTICUT APPENDIX E COUNTERMEASURE DETAILS BROOK OXOBOXO BUILDING J OXOBOXO LOFTS DEVELOPMENT PREPARED FOR PAUL B. BAILEY ARCHITECT, LLC SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE DESIGN www.yanticriverconsultants.comWeb: (860) 367-7264Phone: LEBANON, CONN 06249 191 NORWICH AVENUE YANTIC RIVER CONSULTANTS, LLC CONTACT INFORMATION DATE 12/12/18 UNCASVILLE, CT42 PINK ROW SHEET 1OF 1 SCALE: 1"= N/A' 0 WITH MANUFACTURER) (SIZE TO BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE GROUT FILLED BAG PLACED ON FILTER FABRIC EXISTING STREAMBED PLACEMENT OF BAG(S) OR LARGE STONES TO ACCOMODATE POSSIBLE REMOVAL OF COBBLES ACHIEVED AND A TIGHT REVETMENT SYSTEM IS PLACEMENT TO ENSURE NO CONFLICT DESIGN TO BE COORDINATED WITH BAG PILES AND BRACKET (DESIGN BY OTHERS);18"NOV. 2018 OBSERVED UNDERMINED DEPTH 12" NOV. 2018 OBSERVED UNDERMINED WIDTH VOID SPACE TO BE GROUTED (DESIGN BY OTHERS) CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES DEWATERING AND (IF REQUIRED) FOR TEMPORARY COFFERDAM ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject NumberUNCASVILLE, CT01SHEET LISTDakotaPartners, Inc.OXOBOXOLOFTSCheckerAuthor10/12/201816-063No. Description Date1 Addendum 01 2/1/192 Addendum 02 2/25/191 - COVER DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionC01 COVER 1C02 COVER 201 SHEET LIST 2 2/25/19 Addendum 0203 SHEET LIST 2 2/25/19 Addendum 0202 SHEET LIST 2 2/25/19 Addendum 022 - CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionD1.0 OVERALL SITE DEMO PLANSSURV SITE SURVEYEC-1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONSC-1.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (NORTH)C-1.1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (SOUTH)C-2.0 SITE PREPARATION PLAN (NORTH)C-2.1 SITE PREPARATION PLAN (SOUTH)C-2.2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING PLAN (NORTH)C-2.3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING PLAN (SOUTH)C-3.0 LAYOUT PLAN (NORTH)C-3.1 MATERIAL PLAN (NORTH)C-3.2 MATERIAL PLAN (SOUTH)C-4.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN (NORTH)C-4.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN (SOUTH)C-4.2 HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLITY PLANC-5.0 UTILITY PLANC-6.0 DETAILSC-6.1 DETAILSC-6.2 DETAILSC-6.3 DETAILSC-6.4 DETAILSC-6.5 DETAILSC-6.6 DETAILSC-6.7 DETAILSC-7.0 SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN (NORTH)C-7.1 SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN (SOUTH)L-1.0 PLANTING PLAN (NORTH)L-1.0A PLANTING PLAN NORTHP-1.0 SITE LIGHTING PLANL-1.1 PLANTING PLAN (SOUTH)L-1.2 PLANTING PLAN (ENLARGEMENT)L-1.2A PLANTING PLAN (ENLARGEMENT)3 - LIFE SAFTEY DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionLS1.1 LIFE SAFETY PLANSLS1.2 LIFE SAFETY PLANSLS1.3 LIFE SAFETY PLANSLS1.4 LIFE SAFETY PLANSLS1.5 LIFE SAFETY PLANSLS1.6 LIFE SAFETY PLANS4 - RADON MITIGATION DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionEV1.1 RADON MITIGATION PLANSEV1.2 RADON MITIGATION PLANS5 - GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionR.1 CODE DATA AND GENERAL NOTESR.3 UNIT MIXR.4 INTERIOR ELEVATION MOUNTING DETAILSR.5 WALL TYPESR.6 FLOOR AND CEILING TYPESA5-1 WINDOW SCHEDULE 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01A5-2 WINDOW ELEVATIONS 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01A5-3 WINDOW ELEVATIONS 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01A5-4 DETAIL OF WINDOW HEAD,JAMB & SILLA5-5 DETAIL OF WINDOW HEAD,JAMB & SILLA5-6 DETAIL OF WINDOW HEAD,JAMB & SILLA5-7 DETAIL OF WINDOW HEAD,JAMB & SILLA5-8 DETAIL OF WINDOW HEAD,JAMB & SILL 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01A5-10 DOOR SCHEDULE 2 2/25/19 Addendum 02A5-11 DOOR ELEVATIONS - EXTERIORA5-12 DETAIL OF DOOR HEAD,JAMB & SILLA5-13 DETAILS OF DOOR HEAD, JAMB & SILL6 - SIGNAGE DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionA-7.1.1 SIGNAGE PLANSA-7.1.2 SIGNAGE PLANSA-7.1.3 SIGNAGE PLANSA-7.1.4 SIGNAGE PLANSA-7.1.5 SIGNAGE PLANSA-7.1.6 SIGNAGE PLANSA-7.1.7 SIGNAGE PLANSA-7.1.8 SIGNAGE PLANS7 - FINISH DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionA-7.0.1 FINISH PLANSA-7.0.2 FINISH PLANSA-7.0.3 FINISH PLANSA-7.0.4 FINISH PLANSA-7.0.5 FINISH PLANSA-7.0.6 FINISH PLANS8 - BUILDING A ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionA-D1.0 BUILDING A DEMO PLANSA-A1.0 BUILDING A - LEVEL 0 PLANA-A1.1 BUILDING A - LEVEL 1 PLAN 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01A-A1.2 BUILDING A - LEVEL 2 PLAN 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01A-A1.3 BUILDING A - ROOF PLANA-A1.11 BUILDING A REFLECTED CEILING PLANA-A2.1 BUILDING A ELEVATIONSA-A3.1 BUILDING A SECTIONSA-A3.2 BUILDING A SECTIONSA-A4.1 BUILDING A DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPET 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01A-A6.1 BUILDING A TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSA-A6.2 BUILDING A KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSA-A6.3 BUILDING A KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSA-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING AA-F1.0 BUILDING A FURNITURE PLANS8 - BUILDING AB ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionAB-A1.1 BUILDING AB CONNECTOR STAIR PLANS 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01AB-A3.1 BUILDING AB CONNECTOR SECTIONSAB-A3.2 BUILDING AB CONNECTOR SECTIONSAB-A3.3 BUILDING AB CONNECTOR SECTIONSAB-A4.1 BUILDING AB ROOF DETAILSAB-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING AB22 2/26/19 Addendum 021 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 012 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 02 ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject NumberUNCASVILLE, CT02SHEET LISTDakotaPartners, Inc.OXOBOXOLOFTSCheckerAuthor10/12/201816-063No. Description Date1 Addendum 01 2/1/192 Addendum 02 2/25/198 - BUILDING C ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionC-D1.1 BUILDING C DEMO PLANSC-A1.1 BUILDING C PLANS 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01C-A1.2 BUILDING C PLANSC-A1.11 BUILDING C REFLECTED CEILING PLANC-A2.1 BUILDING C ELEVATIONSC-A3.1 BUILDING C SECTIONSC-A4.1 BUILDING C DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPET 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01C-A6.1 BUILDING C TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSC-A6.2 BUILDING C KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSC-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING CC-F1.1 BUILDING C FURNITURE PLAN8 - BUILDING D ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionD-D1.1 BUILDING D DEMO PLANSD-A1.1 BUILDING D PLANS 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01D-A1.2 BUILDING D PLANSD-A1.11 BUILDING D REFLECTED CEILING PLAND-A2.1 BUILDING D ELEVATIONSD-A3.1 BUILDING D SECTIONSD-A4.1 BUILDING D DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPETD-A6.1 BUILDING D TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSD-A6.2 BUILDING D KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSD-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING DD-F1.1 BUILDING D FURNITURE PLAN8 - BUILDING E ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionE-D1.1 BUILDING E DEMO PLANSE-A1.1 BUILDING E PLANS 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01E-A1.2 BUILDING E PLANSE-A1.11 BUILDING E REFLECTED CEILING PLANE-A2.1 BUILDING E ELEVATIONSE-A3.1 BUILDING E SECTIONSE-A4.1 BUILDING E DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPET 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01E-A6.1 BUILDING E TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSE-A6.2 BUILDING E KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSE-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING EE-F1.1 BUILDING E FURNITURE PLAN8 - BUILDING F ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionF-D1.1 BUILDING F DEMO PLANSF-A1.1 BUILDING F PLAN - LEVEL 1 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01F-A1.2 BUILDING F PLAN - LEVEL 2 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01F-A1.3 BUILDING F PLAN - LEVEL 3F-A1.4 BUILDING F ROOF PLANF-A1.11 BUILDING F LEVEL 1 - REFLECTED CEILING PLANF-A1.12 BUILDING F LEVEL 2 - REFLECTED CEILING PLANF-A2.1 BUILDING F ELEVATIONSF-A2.2 BUILDING F ELEVATIONSF-A3.1 BUILDING F SECTIONF-A3.2 BUILDING F SECTIONF-A4.2 BUILDING F DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPETF-A6.1 BUILDING F TOILET & KITCHEN PLAN & ELEVATIONSF-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING F8 - BUILDING G ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionG-D1.1 BUILDING G DEMO PLANSG-KP1.1 BUILDING G KEY PLANG-A1.1 BUILDING G LEVEL 1 PART A 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01G-A1.2 BUILDING G LEVEL 1 PART B 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01G-A1.3 BUILDING G ROOF PLANG-A1.11 BUILDING G LEVEL 1 - REFLECTED CEILING PLANG-A1.12 BUILDING G LEVEL 1 - REFLECTED CEILING PLANG-A2.1 BUILDING G ELEVATIONSG-A3.1 BUILDING G SECTIONSG-A3.2 BUILDING G SECTIONSG-A3.3 BUILDING G SECTIONSG-A3.4 BUILDING G SECTIONSG-A4.1 BUILDING G DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPETG-A6.1 BUILDING G TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSG-A6.2 BUILDING G KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSG-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING GG-F1.1 BUILDING G FURNITURE PLAN8 - BUILDING HJ ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionHJ-D1.1 BUILDING HJ DEMO PLANSHJ-KP2.1 BUILDING HJ KEY PLANSHJ-A1.1 BUILDING H PLAN 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01HJ-A1.2 BUILDING J PLAN 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01HJ-A1.3 BUILDING J PLAN 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01HJ-A1.4 BUILDING HJ ROOF PLANSHJ-A1.11 BUILDING H REFLECTED CEILING PLANHJ-A1.12 BUILDING J REFLECTED CEILING PLANHJ-A1.13 BUILDING J REFLECTED CEILING PLANHJ-A2.1 BUILDING HJ ELEVATIONSHJ-A3.1 BUILDING H SECTIONSHJ-A3.2 BUILDING J SECTIONSHJ-A4.1 BUILDING HJ DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPETHJ-A6.1 BUILDING H TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSHJ-A6.2 BUILDING J TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSHJ-A6.3 BUILDING J TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSHJ-A6.4 BUILDING H KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSHJ-A6.5 BUILDING J KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSHJ-A6.6 BUILDING J KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSHJ-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING JHJ-A7.4 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING HHJ-A7.5 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING HJ COMMON AREASHJ-F1.1 BUILDING H & J FURNITURE PLAN8 - BUILDING JM ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrentRevisionDescriptionJM-A1.1 BUILDING JM BRIDGE8 - BUILDING K ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrentRevisionDescriptionK-D1.1 BUILDING K DEMO PLANSK-A1.0 BUILDING K PLAN - BASEMENTK-A1.1 BUILDING K PLAN - LEVEL 1 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01K-A1.2 BUILDING K - ROOF PLANK-A1.11 BUILDING K REFLECTED CEILING PLANK-A2.1 BUILDING K ELEVATIONSK-A3.1 BUILDING K SECTIONSK-A4.1 BUILDING K DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPETK-A6.1 BUILDING K TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSK-A6.2 BUILDING K KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSK-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING KK-F1.1 BUILDING K FURNITURE PLAN8 - BUILDING L ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrentRevisionDescriptionL-D1.1 BUILDING L DEMO PLANSL-A1.1 BUILDING L PLAN 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01L-A1.11 BUILDING L REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01L-A2.1 BUILDING L ELEVATIONSL-A3.1 BUILDING L SECTIONSL-A4.1 BUILDING L DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPETL-A6.1 BUILDING L TOILET & KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSL-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING LL-F1.1 BUILDING L FURNITURE PLAN8 - BUILDING M ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrentRevisionDescriptionM-D1.1 BUILDING M DEMO PLANSM-KP1.1 BUILDING M KEY PLANM-A1.1 BUILDING M PLAN - LEVEL BM-A1.2 BUILDING M PLAN - LEVEL BM-A1.3 BUILDING M PLAN - LEVEL BM-A1.4 BUILDING M PLAN - LEVEL 1 PART A 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01M-A1.5 BUILDING M PLAN - LEVEL 1 PART B 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01M-A1.6 BUILDING M PLAN - LEVEL 1 PART C 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01M-A1.7 BUILDING M ROOF PLANM-A1.11 BUILDING M REFLECTED CEILING PLANM-A1.12 BUILDING M REFLECTED CEILING PLANM-A1.13 BUILDING M REFLECTED CEILING PLANM-A2.1 BUILDING M ELEVATIONSM-A3.1 BUILDING M SECTIONSM-A3.2 BUILDING M SECTIONSM-A4.1 BUILDING M DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPETM-A6.1 BUILDING M TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSM-A6.2 BUILDING M TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSM-A6.3 BUILDING M KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSM-A6.4 BUILDING M KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSM-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING MM-F1.1 BUILDING M FURNITURE PLAN8 - BUILDING B ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionB-D1.0 BUILDING B DEMO PLANSB-D1.1 BUILDING B DEMO PLANSB-D1.2 BUILDING B DEMO PLANSB-D1.3 BUILDING B DEMO PLANSB-KP1.1 BUILDING B KEY PLANSB-KP1.2 BUILDING B KEY PLANSB-A1.1 BUILDING B PLANS - LEVEL SB 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01B-A1.2 BUILDING B PLANS - LEVEL B 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01B-A1.3 BUILDING B PLANS - LEVEL ONE 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01B-A1.4 BUILDING B PLANS - LEVEL TWO 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01B-A1.5 BUILDING B PLANS - LEVEL THREE 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01B-A1.6 BUILDING B PLANS - LEVEL FOUR 1 2/1/19 Addendum 01B-A1.7 BUILDING B PLANS - LEVEL ROOFB-A1.11 BUILDING B LEVEL SB - REFLECTED CEILING PLANB-A1.12 BUILDING B LEVEL B - REFLECTED CEILING PLANB-A1.13 BUILDING B LEVEL ONE - REFLECTED CEILING PLANB-A1.14 BUILDING B LEVEL TWO - REFLECTED CEILING PLANB-A1.15 BUILDING B LEVEL THREE - REFLECTED CEILING PLANB-A1.16 BUILDING B LEVEL FOUR - REFLECTED CEILING PLANB-A2.1 BUILDING B ELEVATIONSB-A2.2 BUILDING B ELEVATIONSB-A3.1 BUILDING B SECTIONSB-A3.2 BUILDING B SECTIONSB-A3.3 BUILDING B SECTIONSB-A3.4 BUILDING B SECTIONSB-A4.1 BUILDING B DETAIL ROOF EAVE, RAKE, PARAPETB-A5.1 BUILDING B STAIR 2B-A5.2 BUILDING B STAIR 2B-A5.3 BUILDING B STAIR 2B-A5.4 BUILDING B STAIR 2 SECTIONSB-A5.5 BUILDING B STAIR 2 SECTIONSB-A5.6 ELEVATOR PLANS AND SECTIONSB-A6.1 BUILDING B TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSB-A6.2 BUILDING B TOILET PLANS & ELEVATIONSB-A6.3 BUILDING B KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSB-A6.4 BUILDING B KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONSB-A7.3 FINISH SCHEDULE - BUILDING BB-F1.1 BUILDING B FURNITURE PLANSB-F1.2 BUILDING B FURNITURE PLANSB-F1.3 BUILDING B FURNITURE PLANS2 ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject NumberUNCASVILLE, CT03SHEET LISTDakotaPartners, Inc.OXOBOXOLOFTSCheckerAuthor10/12/201816-063No. Description Date1 Addendum 01 2/1/192 Addendum 02 2/25/199 - STRUCTURAL DRAWINGSSheet Number Sheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionA-S1.1 BUILDING A FRAMING PLANSAB-S1.1 AB CONNECTOR AND BRIDGE PLANSB-S1.0 BUILDING B LEVEL SB FOUNDATION PLANB-S1.0B BUILDING B LEVEL B FOUNDATION AND FRAMING PLANB-S1.1 BUILDING B LEVEL ONE FRAMING PLANB-S1.2 BUILDING B LEVEL TWO FRAMING PLANB-S1.3 BUILDING B LEVEL THREE FRAMING PLANB-S1.4 BUILDING B LEVEL FOUR FRAMING PLANC-S1.1 BUILDING C PLANSD-S1.1 BUILDING D PLANSE-S1.1 BUILDING E PLANSF-S1.1 BUILDING F PLANSG/H-S1.1 BUILDING G/H PLANSJ-S1.1 BUILDING J FOUNDATION PLANM-S1.1 BUILDING M FOUNDATION PLANS1.0 GENERAL NOTESS2.1 TYPICAL DETAILSS2.2 TYPICAL DETAILSS3.1 SECTIONSS3.2 SECTIONSS3.3 SECTIONS10 - MECHANICAL DRAWINGSSheet Number Sheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionABC-MD1.1 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDG A, B - LEVEL 1ABC-MD1.2 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDG B - LEVEL 2ABC-MD1.3 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDG A-LEVEL 2, BLDG B-LEVEL 3ABC-MD1.4 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDG A-ATTIC, BLDG B-LEVEL 4ABC-MD1.B MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDG A-CRAWLSPACE, BLDG C-LEVEL B, BLDG C-LEVEL 2ABC-MD1.SB MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL SB, BLDG C-LEVEL 1DE-MD1.1 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDGS D, E - LEVELS 1 AND 2F-MD1.1 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDG F - LEVELS 1 AND 2G-MD1.1 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDG G - LEVEL 1HK-MD1.1 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDGS H AND K - LEVEL 1J-MD1.1 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDG J - LEVEL 1LM-MD1.1 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - BLDGS L AND M - LEVEL 1ABC-MP1.1 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDGS A AND B - LEVEL 1ABC-MP1.2 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDGS B-LEVEL 2ABC-MP1.3 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDGS A-LEVEL 2 AND BLDG B-LEVEL 3ABC-MP1.4 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDGS A-ATTIC AND BLDG B-LEVEL 4ABC-MP1.B MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDGS B-LEVEL B AND C - LEVEL 2ABC-MP1.SB MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDGS B-LEVEL SB AND BLDG C-LEVEL 1DE-MP1.1 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDGS D AND E - LEVEL 1F-MP1.1 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDG F - LEVELS 1,2 AND 3G-MP1.1 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDG G - LEVEL 1HK-MP1.1 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDG H AND K - LEVEL 1J-MP1.1 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDG J - LEVEL 1LM-MP1.1 MECHANICAL PIPING PLAN - BLDGS L AND M - LEVEL 1M2.1 MECHANICAL SCHEDULESM2.2 MECHANICAL SCHEDULESM3.1 MECHANICAL DETAILSM3.2 MECHANICAL DETAILS, NOTES, SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONSM3.3 MECHANICAL DETAILSM3.4 MECHANICAL DETAILSM3.5 SOURCE WATER CONTROL DIAGRAM11 - PLUMBING DRAWINGSSheet Number Sheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionABC-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDG A AND BLDG B - LEVEL 1ABC-PB1.2 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDG B - LEVEL 2ABC-PB1.3 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDG A-LEVEL 2 AND BLDG B-LEVEL 3ABC-PB1.4 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL 4ABC-PB1.B PLUMBING PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL B AND BLDG C-LEVEL 2ABC-PB1.SB PLUMBING PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL SB AND BLDG C-LEVEL 1DE-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDGS D AND E - LEVELS 1 AND 2F-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDG F - LEVELS 1, 2 AND 3G-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDG G - LEVEL 1HK-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDGS H AND K - LEVEL 1J-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDG J - LEVEL 1LM-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLAN - BLDGS L AND M - LEVEL 1P2.1 PLUMBING SCHEDULES, NOTES, SYMBOLS AND DETAILSP3.1 PLUMBING DETAILS AND ABBREVIATIONSP3.2 PLUMBING DETAILS12 - FIRE SAFETY DRAWINGSSheet Number Sheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionABC-FP1.1 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDG A AND B - LEVEL 1ABC-FP1.2 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDG B - LEVEL 2ABC-FP1.3 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDG A-LEVEL 2 AND BLDG B-LEVEL 3ABC-FP1.4 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDG A-ATTIC AND BLDG B-LEVEL 4ABC-FP1.B FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL B AND BLDG C-LEVEL 2ABC-FP1.SB FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL SB AND BLDG C-LEVEL 1DE-FP1.1 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDGS D AND E - LEVELS 1 AND 2F-FP1.1 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDG F - LEVEL 1 AND 2G-FP1.1 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDG G - CRAWLSPACE AND LEVEL 1HK-FP1.1 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDGS H AND K - LEVEL 1J-FP1.1 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDG J - LEVEL 1LM-FP1.1 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - BLDGS L AND M - LEVEL 1FP2.1 FIRE PROTECTION LEGENDS, NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONFP3.1 FIRE PROTECTION DETAILS13 - ELECTRICAL DRAWINGSSheet Number Sheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionABC-EL1.1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDGS A AND B - LEVEL 1ABC-EL1.2 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDG B - LEVEL 2ABC-EL1.3 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDG A-LEVEL 2 AND BLDG B-LEVEL 3ABC-EL1.4 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDG A-ATTIC AND BLDG B-LEVEL 4ABC-EL1.B ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL B AND BLDG C-LEVEL 2ABC-EL1.SB ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL SB AND BLDG C-LEVEL 1ABC-EP1.1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDGS A AND B - LEVEL 1ABC-EP1.2 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDG B - LEVEL 2ABC-EP1.3 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDG A-LEVEL 2 AND BLDG B-LEVEL 3ABC-EP1.4 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDG A-ATTIC AND BLDG B-LEVEL 4ABC-EP1.B ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL B AND BLDG C-LEVEL 2ABC-EP1.SB ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDG B-LEVEL SB AND BLDG C-LEVEL 1DE-EL1.1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDG D AND E - LEVELS 1 AND 2DE-EP1.1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDGS D AND E - LEVELS 1 AND 2F-EL1.1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDG F - LEVELS 1 AND 2F-EP1.1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDG F - LEVELS 1,2 AND 3GH-EL1.1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDGS G AND H - LEVEL 1GH-EP1.1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDGS G AND H - LEVEL 1J-EL1.1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDG J - LEVEL 1J-EP1.1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDG J - LEVEL 1K-EL1.1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDG K - LEVEL 1K-EP1.1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDG K - LEVEL 1LM-EL1.1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - BLDGS L AND M - LEVEL 1LM-EP1.1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - BLDGS L AND M - LEVEL 1E2.1 POWER RISER DIAGRAME2.2 POWER RISER DIAGRAME2.3 ELECTRICAL DETAILSE3.1 ELECTRICAL PANEL BOARD SCHEDULESE3.2 ELECTRICAL PANEL BOARD SCHEDULESE3.3 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES21 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 012 2/25/19 Addendum 021 2/1/19 Addendum 012 2/25/19 Addendum 021 2/1/19 Addendum 012 2/25/19 Addendum 021 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 012 2/25/19 Addendum 021 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 012 2/25/19 Addendum 021 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 012 2/25/19 Addendum 021 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 012 2/25/19 Addendum 022 2/25/19 Addendum 022 2/25/19 Addendum 021 2/1/19 Addendum 011 2/1/19 Addendum 012 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/26/19 Addendum 022 2/25/19 Addendum 022 2/25/19 Addendum 022 2/25/19 Addendum 022 2/25/19 Addendum 022 2/25/19 Addendum 022 2/25/19 Addendum 0214 - SECURITY DRAWINGSSheetNumberSheet NameCurrentRevisionCurrentRevisionDateCurrent RevisionDescriptionSEC.1 SECURITY LEGENDS AND NOTESSEC.2 SECURITY USER SECTIONSEC.3 SECURITY EQUIPMENT SCHEDULESSEC.4 SECURITY EQUIPMENT SCHEDULESSEC.5 SECURITY EQUIPMENT SCHEDULESSEC.6 SECURITY EQUIPMENT SCHEDULESSEC.7 SECURITY PLAN - BLDG ASEC.8 SECURITY PLANS - BLDG B LEVELS SB, B, 1SEC.9 SECURITY PLANS - BLDG B LEVELS 2, 3, 4SEC.10 SECURITY PLANS - BLDG C LEVELS 1 AND 2SEC.11 SECURITY PLANS - BLDGS D AND E LEVELS 1 AND 2SEC.12 SECURITY PLANS - BLDG F LEVEL 1 AND 2SEC.13 SECURITY PLAN - BLDG G LEVEL 1SEC.14 SECURITY PLANS - BLDGS H AND K LEVEL 1SEC.15 SECURITY PLAN - BLDG J LEVEL 1SEC.16 SECURITY PLANS - BLDGS L AND M LEVEL 1SEC.17 SECURITY CAMERA SITE PLANSEC.18 TYPICAL SECURITY RISER DIAGRAMSEC.19 VIDEO SURVEILLANCE MOUNTING DETAILSSEC.20 ACCESS CONTROL MOUNTING DETAILSSEC.21 HEAD-END #5 WALL RACK DIMENSIONSSEC.22 HEAD-END #1, 2, 3, 4 AND 6 WALL RACK DIMENSIONS ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject NumberUNCASVILLE, CTN.T.S.R-1REFERENCESHEET: CODEDATA, GEN.NOTESDakotaPartners, Inc.OXOBOXOLOFTSSBOSBO16-063No.DescriptionDate58 Essex StreetDeep River, CT 06417(860) 532-0312Aztech Engineers, Inc.901 Wethersfield AvenueHartford, Ct. 06114INC.Phone (860)548-9987Fax (860)549-2572www.aztecheng.comZTECH ENGINEERS,Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033860 652 8227300 Winding Brook DriveFeb. 25, 2019ADDENDUM 22/25/20192 ,17(5,25'225(/(9$7,21667</($6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(67</()6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/((4 (46((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(67</(&67</(%6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/((4 (46((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(67</('67</((&/($5*/$66:,5(*/$66 6,0$; 67</(*6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(6((6&+('8/(67</(+6FDOH'DWH'UDZQ%\&KHFNHG%\3URMHFW1XPEHU81&$69,//(&7 $'2256&+('8/('DNRWD3DUWQHUV,QF2;2%2;2/2)76&KHFNHU$XWKRU'RRU6FKHGXOH0DUN 6W\OH /RFDWLRQ 'HVFULSWLRQ6LQJOH3DLU:LGWK +HLJKW )LUH5DWLQJ )UDPH7\SH 'RRU-DPE'HWDLO 'RRU+HDG'HWDLO+DUGZDUH6HW &RPPHQWV([WHULRU'RRUV' %8,/',1*$ :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVDQG6LGHOLJKW V DQG7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*$ :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVDQG6LGHOLJKW V 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*% :RRGDQG*ODVV 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*% :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVV 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG:RRG' %8,/',1*% :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVDQG6LGHOLJKW V DQG7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*% :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVDQG6LGHOLJKW V 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*& :RRG3DQHOZLWK7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*& :RRG3DQHOZLWK7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*& :RRG3DQHOZLWK6LGHOLJKW V 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*' :RRG3DQHOZLWK6LGHOLJKW V DQG7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*' :RRG3DQHOZLWK7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*' :RRG3DQHOZLWK6LGHOLJKW V DQG7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*( :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVDQG6LGHOLJKW V 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*( :RRGDQG*ODVVZLWK6LGHOLJKW V 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*( :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVZLWK7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*) :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVV 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG:RRG' %8,/',1*) :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVDQG6LGHOLJKW V DQG7UDQVRP 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*) :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVV 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG:RRG' %8,/',1** :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVDQG6LGHOLJKW V DQG7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1** :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVZLWK7UDQVRP 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*- :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVDQG6LGHOLJKW V DQG7UDQVRP 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*/ :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVV 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG:RRG' %8,/',1*0 :RRG3DQHOZLWK*ODVVZLWK7UDQVRP 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*$% :RRG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG' %8,/',1*$ )OXVK0HWDOLQVXODWHG 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG +ROORZ0HWDO,QWHULRU'RRUV' ) (;,767$,5 )OXVK0HWDOZLWK*ODVV 6LQJOH 0,1+ROORZ0HWDO $ $' * 0(&+$1,&$/-$1,725 )OXVK0HWDO 6LQJOH " +ROORZ0HWDO $ $' * 0(&+$1,&$/-$1,725 )OXVK0HWDO 6LQJOH " +ROORZ0HWDO $ $' $ 38%/,&72,/(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $' $ 2)),&( 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $$' $ /($6,1*2)),&( 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $' $ ),/(&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG$ $' * -$1,7255220 )OXVK0HWDO 6LQJOH " +ROORZ0HWDO $ $' + 0(&+$1,&$/5220%/'*) )OXVK0HWDO 'RXEOH <(6+ROORZ0HWDO $ $' + 6725$*(5220%/'*/ )OXVK0HWDO 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG +ROORZ0HWDO $ $8QLW'RRUV' $ 81,7(175< 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 0,1 +ROORZ0HWDO $ $' $ %('5220%$7+5220 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG:RRG $ $'$ $ %('5220%$7+5220 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $'% ( %('5220 :RRGDQG*ODVV 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $' $ &2$7&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $'% $ &2$7&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG$ $'& ' &2$7&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG$ $'' $ &2$7&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG$ $'( $ &2$7&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG$ $' & %('5220&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $'$ $ %('5220&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $'% ' %('5220&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 'RXEOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $' % /,1(1&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG$ $'$ % /,1(1&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $'% % /,1(1&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $'& % /,1(1&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $' $ 0(&+$1,&$/&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $' % /,1(1&/26(7 0ROGHG3DQHO 6LQJOH 1RW5DWHG :RRG $ $6((6+((7$'225(/(9$7,216(;7(5,251R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH $GGHQGXP $GGHQGXP 3HUPLW6HW UP UP WA L2.2 L2.A L2.B L2.C L2.D L2.E L2.F L2.G L2.H L2.J L2.K L2.M L2.N L2.1 L2.L UNIT C-1(2 BEDROOM) UNIT C-2(2 BEDROOM) STAIR 2 ELECTRICALMETER ROOM MAINTENANCE ROOM BOILER ROOM SPRINKLER ROOM BUILDING B BUILDING C BUILDING A (ABOVE) BUILDING D BUILDING G HP2 HP2 C-175 C-175 B-150 B-15010"ø8"ø14"øB-150 B-150 B-150 D-250 D-250 7"ø12"ø 12"ø T HP-2 R7-800 T HP2 R7-800 12"x10" EF-1 EWH-1 EWH-2 4" EA UP(TYPICAL) EF-1 EF-1 EUH-1 EF-1 14"ø 8"ø 4" EA TO WEATHERPROOFWALL CAP (TYPICAL FOR 4) DOMESTIC HOT WATER BOILER 6" FLUE VENT AND 8" COMBUSTION AIRINTAKE AXG AXGAXG AXG B-1 6" FLUE EXHAUST AND 8"COMBUSTION AIR INTAKE TOWALL TERMINAL KIT. SIZE,ROUTING, LOCATION ANDINSTALLATION AS PERMANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS (TYPICAL) 8"ø 6"ø 4"ø12X6" AIR TRANSFERGRILLE ASSEMBLY(AXG). PROVIDE 12"X3"TRANSFER DUCT INWALL WITH HIGHINLET GRILLE ANDLOW OUTLET GRILLE(TYPICAL FOR ALL) 4"ø4"ø 4"ø 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-MD1.SB MECHANICALDUCTWORK PLANBLDG 'B'-LEVEL SB BLDG 'C' - LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 UP DNDN DN DNDN DN 1 A B 2 OAL2.A L2.B L2.C L2.D O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 BUILDING D UNIT D-1 (2 BEDROOM) UNIT D-2(1 BEDROOM) RECEPTION OFFICE KITCHEN OFFICE WAITINGAREA HC LAV. JAN. MECH'L CONFROOM FITNESSROOM BUILDING E HP2 HP1 1"SWS&R UP HP-2 HP-2 1 1/4" SWS&R UP 1 1/4"ø SWR 1 1/4"ø SWS 2 3/4"ø SWR 1"ø SWR 1"ø SWS 1 A B 2 OAL2.A L2.B L2.C L2.D O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 BUILDING D BUILDING E UNIT D-3(2 BEDROOM) UNIT D-4(1 BEDROOM) UNIT E-2(2 BEDROOM) UNIT E-3(2 BEDROOM) HP2 HP1 HP1 HP2 1 1/2" SWS&R 1 1/4" SWS&R 2"SWS&R HP1 1"SWS&R DN 3/4"SWS&R DN 3/4"ø SWR 3/4"ø SWR 1"ø SWS 1 1/4" SWS&R DN 1"ø SWR 1"ø SWS 1"ø SWS1"ø SWR 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" DE-MP1.1 MECHANICALPIPING PLANBLDGS 'D', 'E' - LEVELS 1 & 2 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 COMMUNITY ROOM(OPEN ABOVE) KITCHENETTE JANTOILET FITNESS ROOM(OPEN ABOVE) TOILET R9-1800 24X14 RA DN TO FLOOR, MOUNTBOTTOM OF GRILLE MAX. 12" AFF.ENCLOSURE BY ARCHITECT HP-8 T EF-1EF-1 UC3/4"UC3/4"LEVEL ONE 6"ø 4"ø 6" EA TOWEATHERPROOFWALL CAP BOILER ROOM FITNESS ROOMBELOW COMMUNITYBELOW TOILETSBELOW S-1 COOLING TOWERSUMP 18"ø 18"ø10"ø14"ø 9"ø 12"ø HP8 C-200C-200 C-200C-200 C-200C-200 A-100 B-150 A-100 B-150 B-150 B-150 24"x14"24X14 RA DN8" COMBUSTION AIR INTAKE AND6" AL29-4C(SS) OR PPE FLUEEXHAUST UP THROUGH ROOF(TYPICAL FOR 2) LEVEL TWO 8" OA UP TO WEATHERPROOFROOF CAP. INTERLOCKMOTORIZED DAMPER WITHHEAT PUMP BLOWER 2 CT1 ROOF 8" OA FROM WEATHERPROOFROOF CAP DN TO HP8 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" F-MD1.1 MECHANICALDUCTWORKPLANS BLDG 'F' - LEVELS 1 & 2 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 B1 B1 2 UNIT H-2(2 BEDROOM) METERROOM UNIT H-1 (1 BEDROOM) METERROOM LAUNDRYROOM BOILER ROOM JANITOR LOBBY BUILDING H BUILDING J BUILDING KHP1 HP2 R7-800 16"x10" T B-175CFM A-100 C-200 C-200 B-1258"ø 12"ø 14"ø 7"ø 12"ø12"x10"R6-600 B-150 12"ø9"øD-225 D-225 T HP-1 HP-2 16"ø 14"ø A-100 CFM UNIT K-2 (2 BEDROOM) UNIT K-4(1 BEDROOM) UNIT K-1 (1 BEDROOM) UNIT K-3 (1 BEDROOM) HP1 HP1 HP1 C-175 C-200 D-225 R6-600 T HP-1 D-225 B-150 D-225R6-600 T HP-1 C-175 R6-600 C-200 D-225 THP-1 B-150 D-250 D-250 B-150 R7-800 14"ø 12"ø 10"ø 8"ø8"ø10"ø12"ø 8"ø8"ø10"ø8"ø12"ø12"x10"14"ø14"ø16"x10"8"ø10"ø12"ø 12"x10" HP2 EF-1 EF-1 4" DRYER EXHAUST UPTO WEATHERPROOF ROOFCAP (TYPICAL FOR 3) T HP-3 T HP-2 4"ø EF-1 4"ø 4"ø4"ø 4"ø 4"ø 4"ø 4"ø 4"ø 4"ø EF-1 EF-1EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 T HP-3 R9-1750CFM R8-1050CFM 14"ø B-150 CFM B-150 CFM 16"ø AXG AXG AXG AXG AXG AXG AXG 12"x6" AIR TRANSFER GRILLE ASSEMBLY(AXG). PROVIDE 12"X3" TRANSFER DUCTIN WALL WITH HIGH INLET GRILLE ANDLOW OUTLET GRILLE (TYPICAL FOR ALL) 12"x6" AIR TRANSFER GRILLE ASSEMBLY(AXG). PROVIDE 12"X3" TRANSFER DUCTIN WALL WITH HIGH INLET GRILLE ANDLOW OUTLET GRILLE (TYPICAL FOR ALL) EWH-13 4"ø4"ø 20"x12" 20"x10" HP3 HP3 4" EA UP TOWEATHERPOOFCAP (TYPICALFOR ALL KITCHENAND BATHROOMFANS) 6" FLUE VENT AND 8"COMBUSTUBLE AIR INTAKETO TERMINATE AT ROOFTOPWEATHERPROOF VENT KIT B-1 12X38"ø6"ø 2 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" HK-MD1.1 MECHANICALDUCTWORK PLANBLDGS, "H" & 'K' - LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 REMARKSTHROWINLET SIZENUMBERTYPE DIFFUSERS, REGISTERS & GRILLES SCHEDULE FACE SIZEMANUFACTURER / MODEL NUMBER NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF AIR INLETS AND OUTLETS SO AS TO ACHIEVE COMPATIBILITY WITH SELECTED CEILING, WALL OR DUCT SYSTEM2. AIR INLETS AND OUTLETS SHALL BE SELECTED BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA - MAXIMUM INLET OR OUTLET VELOCITY 500 FPM - MAXIMUM NC RATING NOT TO EXCEED 35 - THROW PATTERN AS PER SCHEDULES AND PLANS - THROWS SHALL NOT INTERSECT OR REACH WALLS AND PARTITIONS3. FINISH SELECTION BY ARCHITECT GALVANIZED STEELALINDAB/RGS-3 DUCT MOUNT 20 X 4 17 X 3 -ADJUSTABLE NECK SIZE MODEL NUMBER SCHEDULE OF ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATORS SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/LOCATION CFM EXHAUST AIROUTSIDE AIR CFM S.P. (IN. WG.) TOTALEXT. REMARKS ERV-1 A ATTIC A BUILDING RENEWAIRE/480 IN 250 0.75 N/A 240 .75 N/A ELECTRICAL VOLTHP PH 11200.6 WINTER 452 S.P. (IN. WG.) TOTALEXT. SUMMER SUMMER EAT DB/WB LAT DB/WB 91/73 80/63 AREA SERVED WEIGHT(LBS) 150 EAT DB WINTER LAT ERV-2 B ATTIC B BUILDING RENEWAIRE/HE 1.5X INH 800 0.75 N/A 750 .75 N/A 11201.0 452 91/73 80/63 400 MCA 9 18 MOCP 15 20 DAMPER INTEGRAL GALVANIZED STEELBLINDAB/RGS-3 16 X 7 13 X 6 -ADJUSTABLE INTEGRAL GALVANIZED STEELCLINDAB/RGS-3 20 X 7 17 X 6 -ADJUSTABLE INTEGRAL GALVANIZED STEELDLINDAB/RGS-3 24 X 7 21 X 6 -ADJUSTABLE INTEGRAL GALVANIZED STEELR1LINDAB/RGS-3 -INTEGRAL GALVANIZED STEELR2LINDAB/RGS-3 -INTEGRAL GALVANIZED STEELR3LINDAB/RGS-3 -INTEGRAL GALVANIZED STEELGMETALAIRE/V4004D 12 X 8 10 X 6 -ADJUSTABLE OBD GALVANIZED STEELELINDAB/RGS-3 28 X 7 25 X 6 -ADJUSTABLE INTEGRAL GALVANIZED STEELFLINDAB/RGS-3 24 X 10 21 X 9 -ADJUSTABLE INTEGRAL DUCT MOUNT DUCT MOUNT DUCT MOUNT DUCT MOUNT DUCT MOUNT DUCT MOUNT DUCT MOUNT DUCT MOUNT SIDEWALL MOUNT 20 X 4 17 X 3 16 X 7 13 X 6 20 X 7 17 X 6 - - - GALVANIZED STEELHMETALAIRE/V4004D 14 X 8 12 X 6 -ADJUSTABLESIDEWALL MOUNT GALVANIZED STEELIMETALAIRE/V4004D 20 X 8 18 X 6 -ADJUSTABLESIDEWALL MOUNT GALVANIZED STEELJMETALAIRE/V4004D 18 X 10 16 X 8 -ADJUSTABLESIDEWALL MOUNT GALVANIZED STEELKMETALAIRE/V4004D 22 X 10 20 X 8 -ADJUSTABLESIDEWALL MOUNT OBD OBD OBD OBD GALVANIZED STEELR4METALAIRE/RHD 12 X 8 10 X 6 -SIDEWALL MOUNT OBD- GALVANIZED STEELR5METALAIRE/RHD 20 X 10 18 X 8 -SIDEWALL MOUNT OBD- GALVANIZED STEELR6METALAIRE/RHD 20 X 14 18 X 12 -SIDEWALL MOUNT OBD- GALVANIZED STEELR7METALAIRE/RHD 30 X 14 28 X 12 -SIDEWALL MOUNT OBD- GALVANIZED STEELR8METALAIRE/RHD 26 X 20 24 X 18 -SIDEWALL MOUNT OBD- GALVANIZED STEELR9METALAIRE/RHD 32 X 26 30 X 24 -SIDEWALL MOUNT OBD- GALVANIZED STEELR10METALAIRE/RHD 14 X 14 12 X 12 -CEILING MOUNT OBD- GALVANIZED STEELE1METALAIRE/RHD 10 X 10 8 X 8 -CEILING MOUNT OBD- ELECTRIC HEATER SCHEDULE MANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBER CAPACITY (BTUH)SYMBOL LOCATION EWH-1 BUILDING 'B' SPRINKLER ROOM BERKO / SRA-1012A 3413 CFM 65 ENT LVG 104 TEMP (°F) AIR DATA ELECTRICAL DATA KW 1.0 8.4 A VOLT PH 120 1 INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, SURFACE MOUNTING SLEEVE REMARKS BUILDING 'B' ELECTRIC ROOM BUILDING 'B' SOUTH STAIRS BUILDING 'B' NORTH VESTIBULE EWH-2 EWH-3 EWH-4 BUILDING "B" MAINTENANCE ROOMEUH-1 UNIT B-12 BEDROOMEWH-5 UNIT B-17 BEDROOMEWH-6 UNIT B-22 BEDROOMEWH-7 UNIT D-2 BATHROOMEWH-8 UNIT D-1 BATHROOMEWH-9 BUILDING 'D' STAIRSEWH-10 UNIT D-4 BATHROOMEWH-11 BUILDING 'E' STAIRSEWH-12 BUILDING 'H' METERROOMEWH-13 BERKO / SRA-1812A BERKO / SRA-1812A BERKO / SRA-1012A BERKO / SRA-1512A BERKO / SRA-1012A BERKO / SRA-1812A BERKO / SRA-1512A BERKO / HUHAA-524 NOTE- PROVIDE ALL UNITS WITH TAMPERPROOF ENCLOSURE BERKO / SRA-1512A BERKO / SRA-1512A BERKO / SRA-1512A BERKO / SRA-1512A BERKO / SRA-1512A 6142 6142 3413 2560 2560 2560 2560 2560 5120 2560 3071 5120 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 111 111 104 98 98 98 98 98 108 98 101 108 118 1.8 1.8 1.0 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.5 0.90 0.75 1.5 3.7 18.0 12.5 7.5 6.25 12.5 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 8.4 15.0 15.0 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 208 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 112,600 350 INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, SURFACE MOUNTING SLEEVE INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, SURFACE MOUNTING SLEEVE INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, SURFACE MOUNTING SLEEVE INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, RECESSED MOUNTING SLEEVE INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, SURFACE MOUNTING SLEEVE INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, RECESSED MOUNTINGSLEEVE INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, SURFACE MOUNTING SLEEVE INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, SURFACE MOUNTING SLEEVE WALL THERMOSTAT, HORIZONTAL MOUNT NOTES:1) PROVIDE WITH MOTOR STARTER AND DISCONNECT SWITCH. 2) MANUFACTURER TO FURNISH INDOOR UNITS COMPLETE WITH ELECTRONIC EXPANSION VALVE. VALVE ACTUATOR SHALL BE REMOVABLE WITHOUT OF REFRIGERANT. 3) MANUFACTURER TO FURNISH EACH INDOOR UNIT WITH A WIRED, WALL MOUNTED CONTROLLER. 4) FAN COIL UNITS SHALL BE MOUNTED ON EQUIPMENT SUPPORT PAD WITH VIBRATION ISOLATION. 5) ALLOW PROPER CLEARANCES FOR SERVICE AND ACCESS. 6) DUCTED UNITS SHALL REQUIRE THE FACTORY FILTER TO BE REMOVED FROM THE FRONT OF THE UNIT. HEATPUMP DEPTH(IN.) FILTER DATA EFFICIENCYTYPE PHVOLT MCA ELECTRICAL DATA EXT. S.P.(IN. WG.) TOTALS.A.(CFM) AREASERVED MANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBERSYMBOL SCHEDULE OF FAN COIL UNITS LVG AIR (°F) DB/WB ENT AIR (°F) DB/WB COOLING DATA TOT CAP (BTUH)SENS CAP (BTUH) LVG AIR(°F)ENT AIR(°F) HEAT PUMP HEATING DATA TOT CAP (BTUH) NOTES REFRIGERANTLINE SIZE MOCP HP LIQ.SUCT. 7) FOR FC UNITS EXCLUDING ELECTRIC HEAT. CAPACITIES BASED ON -5°F HEATING & 87° F COOLING OUTDOOR AMBIENT TEMP CONDENSATEDRAIN SIZETONNAGE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7FC-1 AHP-1 7055412,35016,89056/5575/630.361.5SEE DRAWING FUJITSU/ARU18RLF 110 18,400 THROW AWAY 30%2"1 1515 3/8 3/4208- MCALIQUID SCHEDULE OF AIR SOURCE HEAT PUMPS NUMBER LOCATION VOLT ELECTRICAL DATALINE SIZES SUCTION PH REMARKSEQUIPMENT SERVED MANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBER NOMINALCOOLINGCAPACITYMBH NO. OFFANS NOMINALHEATINGCAPACITYMBH AHP-1 GRADE FC-3 16.9 18.4 1 1/2"17.32081 PROVIDE DISC. SWITCH, STARTERFUJITZU / AOU18RLFC NOTE: HEATING CAPACITY IS BASED ON -5°F OA CONDITION 1/4" INTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, RECESSED MOUNTINGSLEEVEINTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, RECESSED MOUNTINGSLEEVEINTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, RECESSED MOUNTINGSLEEVEINTEGRAL THERMOSTAT, RECESSED MOUNTING SLEEVE Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" M2.2 MECHANICALSCHEDULES Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS PC RMS 11/01/2017 16-063 No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/192 OA L2.2 L2.A L2.B L2.C L2.D L2.E L2.F L2.G L2.H L2.J L2.K L2.1 O1 O2 O3 O4 O5W1W2W3W4W5W6W7W8W9 L2.L BUILDING D BUILDING B BUILDING C BUILDING G BUILDING A UNIT A-1 (2 BEDROOM) UNIT A-2 (1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-3(1 BEDROOM) TYPE 'A' UNIT B-4(2 BEDROOM) UNIT B-5(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-6(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-7(STUDIO) UNIT A-2(2 BEDROOM) 4" CW SERVICE IN, SEESITE UTILITY PLAN FORCONTINUATION 4"ø WCO 4"ø W FD 2"ø2" W UP& DN 4"ø 3"ø 3"ø3/4"ø 4"ø 4" WUP&DN L-1 WC-1 B-1 S-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 S-1 4" CW SERVICE DN TOMETER EQUIPMENT, 3" CWUP TO BUILDING SERVICE 3" HW & 1" HWR DN S-1 S-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 L-1 WC-1 SH-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 L-1 WC-1B-1 L-1 WC-1B-1 S-1 S-1 S-1 FCO 2"ø2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 3" V UP 2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 2 1/2"ø 3" VUP 2 1/2"ø 2"ø2"ø 1 1/2"ø1 1/2"ø2"ø 3" VUP 1 1/2"ø 2"ø2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2 1/2"ø3" VUP 2"ø 1 1/2"ø 3"ø 2"ø 2 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 3" VUP 1 1/2"ø 3" V UP 3" V UP 2"ø2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2 1/2"ø 2"ø 4" W UP 2"ø HP1 HP-1 HP 2"ø 3/4" CONDENSATEDRAINS WITH INDIRECTWASTE CONNECTIONTO NEAREST SANITARY,VERIFY LOCATION ANDROUTING IN FIELD(TYPICAL) 2"ø 2"ø 3/4" CONDENSATE DRAINS WITHINDIRECT WASTE CONNECTION TONEAREST SANITARY, VERIFY LOCATIONAND ROUTING IN FIELD (TYPICAL) HP6 HP6 HP6 HP6 HP6 3/4" CONDENSATE DRAINS WITHINDIRECT WASTE CONNECTION TONEAREST SANITARY, VERIFY LOCATIONAND ROUTING IN FIELD (TYPICAL) 3"ø 4"ø4"ø DCW3"ø DCW3"ø DHW1"ø DHWR2"ø DCW2"ø DHW1"ø DHWR1/2"ø1/2"ø 1"ø 2"ø 2"ø 3"ø 3" V UP2"ø2"ø 2 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLANBLDG 'A' - LEVEL 1 BLDG 'B' - LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 OA L2.2 L2.A L2.B L2.C L2.D L2.E L2.F L2.G L2.H L2.J L2.K L2.M L2.N L2.1 O1 O2 O3 O4 O5W1W2W3W4W5W6W7W8W9 L2.L UNIT B-1(2 BEDROOM) TYPE A UNIT B-2 (2 BEDROOM) UNIT C-3 (2 BEDROOM)TYPE A UNIT C-4(2 BEDROOM) TYPE A ELEVATOR BUILDING B BUILDING C BUILDING A CRAWL SPACE BUILDING G BUILDING D 1" HWR UP&DN 3" HW UP&DN 3" CW UP&DN 4" CW SERVICEUP&DN L-1 WC-1 B-1 S-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 S-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 S-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 S-1 4" WDN 1 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 4"ø1"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø 3/4"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø 1"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø ERV-1 HP-5 HP7 HP7 HP2 HP2 1"ø1/2"ø1"ø 1"ø3/4"ø3/4"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø4"ø 1 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø 3/4" CONDENSATE DRAINS WITHINDIRECT WASTE CONNECTION TONEAREST SANITARY, VERIFY LOCATIONAND ROUTING IN FIELD (TYPICAL) 3/4" CONDENSATE DRAINS WITHINDIRECT WASTE CONNECTION TONEAREST SANITARY, VERIFY LOCATIONAND ROUTING IN FIELD (TYPICAL) 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-PB1.B PLUMBING PLANBLDG A-CRAWL SPACE BLDG 'B' - LEVEL BBLDG 'C' - LEVEL 2 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 UP UP BFP BFP L2.2 L2.A L2.B L2.C L2.D L2.E L2.F L2.G L2.H L2.J L2.K L2.1 L2.L UNIT C-1 (2 BEDROOM)UNIT C-2(2 BEDROOM) STAIR 2 ELECTRICAL METERROOM MAINTENANCEROOM BOILERROOMSPRINKLERROOM BUILDING B BUILDING C BUILDING A (ABOVE) BUILDING D BUILDING G ET2 AS2 B1 ET1 TMV1P1 P2 (2) 300 GALLON INDIRECT HOT WATERSTORAGE TANKS SEE 11/P3.2 FORPIPING DIAGRAM GAS FIRED DOMESTICHOT WATER BOILER FOR DOMESTIC WATERSERVICE INSTALLATIONSEE 7/P3.1 3"CW UP 4"CW SERVICEFROM ABOVE CO 6" SANITARY FROM ABOVE,PROVIDE CLEANOUT AT BASEOF RISER AS1 3"ø 2"ø 6"ø W 4"ø W co 3"ø V 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 4"ø W1 1/2V UP 1 1/2V UP 3"V UP 1/2"DH&CW DNTYP OF BATHTUB 4"ø3/4"ø DHWR 4" SANITARY FROM BUILDING D,SEE DRAWING DE-P1.1 FORCONTINUATION 4"ø WYCO 3"HW UP 1"HWR FROM ABOVE FCO 6"ø W S-1 L-1 WC-2 B-1 WC-1 L-1 S-1 6"ø YCO 4" SANITARY FROM BUILDING F,SEE DRAWING F-PB1.1 FORCONTINUATION 6" SANITARY AND 2" GASTO BUILDING G, SEEDRAWING G-PB1.1 FORCONTINUATION FCO6"ø2"ø DCW 4"ø2" HW AND3/4" HWR UP 1" CW UP 4" W UP&DN L-1 WC-1 B-1 S-1 L-1WC-1 B-1 1 1/2" CW AND 3" GAS TOBUILDING F, SEEDRAWING F-PB1.1 FORCONTINUATION B-1 SANITARY PIPING FROMRESPECTIVE FIXTURESABOVE (TYPICAL FOR ALL) 2"ø2"ø FD-1 2"ø GG G SANITARY PIPING FROMRESPECTIVE FIXTURESABOVE (TYPICAL FOR ALL)GHP2 HP2 3/4" CONDENSATE DRAINS WITHINDIRECT WASTE CONNECTION TONEAREST SANITARY, VERIFY LOCATIONAND ROUTING IN FIELD (TYPICAL) 4"ø G1 1/2"ø 2 GWScale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-PB1.SB PLUMBING PLANBLDG 'B' - LEVEL SB BLDG 'C' - LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 UP DNDN DN DN DN 1 A B 2 OA O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 BUILDING D UNIT D-1 (2 BEDROOM) UNIT D-2(1 BEDROOM) RECEPTION OFFICE KITCHEN OFFICE WAITINGAREA HC LAV. JAN. MECH'L CONFROOM FITNESSROOM BUILDING E 1/2"ø DCW 1/2"ø DCW 1/2"ø DHW 1" C&HW UP 1/2"C&HWUP 1/2" C&HW UP 3/4"ø 3/4"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø1"ø DHW 1"ø DCW 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø FCO 2"ø WFCO 1 1/2"ø W 4"ø4"ø W4"ø W 4"ø W UP 4"ø W UP 2"ø W 2"ø 4"ø 1 1/2"ø 4"ø 4"ø W 1 1/2" W UP 4" SANITARY TO BUILDING B,SEE DRAWING ABC-P1.SBFOR CONTINUATION LEVEL 1 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 2"ø 3" V UP 2 1/2"ø 2"ø2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 2"ø 2 1/2"ø V UP 2 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø HP1 HP2 S-1 S-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1 B-1 B-1 S-1 HP2 HP2 2 2 1 A B 2 OA O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 BUILDING D BUILDING E UNIT D-3(2 BEDROOM) UNIT D-4 (1 BEDROOM) UNIT E-2(1 BEDROOM)UNIT E-3(2 BEDROOM) 1 1/2"ø1 1/4"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø 1" C&HW DN 3/4"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 1/2"ø DHWR 1"ø DHW1"ø DCW 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø 1 1/4"ø1"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1"ø 1 1/4"ø1/2"ø1/2" CW&HW DN 1 1/4"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø DCW DHWDHWR 1"ø DCW1 1/4"ø DHW1/2"ø DHWR 1 1/2" CW &1 1/4" HW 4"ø W DN 4"ø W DN 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø W 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 4"ø 1 1/2" W DN 4" W DN 2" W DN 1 1/2" W DN LEVEL 2 1 1/2" W DN 4" W DN 3" V DN&UPTO 4" VTR 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø2"ø 2"ø 2 1/2"ø2 1/2"ø 4"ø 4" VENTTO VTR 2 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø2"ø 2"ø HP2 HP2 HP2 HP2 2 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" DE-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLANBLDGS 'D' AND 'E' - LEVEL 1 AND 2 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 S-1 S-1 S-1 S-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 B-1 WC-1 L-1 B-1 L-1 L-1 WC-1 WC-1 B-1 COMMUNITY ROOM (OPEN ABOVE) KITCHENETTE JAN TOILET FITNESS ROOM (OPEN ABOVE) 1 1/2"ø 4" W TO BLDG 'C',SEE DRAWINGABC-PB1.SB FORCONTINUATION 4"ø 3"ø 3"ø 2 1/2"ø 2 1/2" V &3" W UP 3"ø 3"ø S-1 L-2 WC-2 WH-1 L-2 WC-2 3/4"ø 4"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø3/4"ø 1/2"ø 1 1/2" CW FROM BLDG 'C',SEE DRAWINGABC-PB1.SB FORCONTINUATION 1 1/2" CW DN, 1" CW UPTO BOILER ROOM LEVEL 1 FD-1 3"ø 2"ø 2"ø 2"ø 2 1/2"ø FCO 3" W UP 3" GAS OUT, SEEDRAWINGABC-PB1.SB FORCONTINUATION G ELEVATOR PIT SUMP PIT INCOMING GAS SEVICEAND METER BY LOCALUTILITY COMPANY.SEE SITE UTILITY PLANFOR CONTINUATION 4" GAS UP,SEE LEVEL 2THIS SHEET FORCONTINUATION BOILER ROOM FITNESS ROOM BELOW COMMUNITYBELOW TOILETSBELOW 3" W DN,2" VTR 3" FD 1" CW MAKEUPTO BOILER LOOP 1" CW FILL FORSUMP TANK LEVEL 2 SUMPTANK 1" CWUP&DN 1"ø1"ø 1"ø G G 4" GAS FROM BELOW,SEE LEVEL 1 THIS SHEETFOR CONTINUATION2" GAS DN TOBOILER (TYPICALFOR 2) 3" GAS DN 2 4"ø 3"ø 2"ø2"ø B1 B1 2" V FROM BELOWTO 2" VTR ROOF CT-1 1" CW MAKE UP TOCOOLING TOWER 1"ø Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" F-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLANBUILDING 'F' - LEVEL 1, LEVEL 2AND MEZZANINE Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 2 2 BUILDING H BUILDING G 4"ø UNIT G-5(2 BEDROOM)UNIT G-6 (1 BEDROOM)UNIT G-7(1 BEDROOM) UNIT G-8 (1 BEDROOM)UNIT G-9(2 BEDROOM) UNIT G-4(1 BEDROOM)UNIT G-3(1 BEDROOM)UNIT G-2(1 BEDROOM) UNIT G-1(2 BEDROOM) 6"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø 1/2"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø3/4"ø 1"ø 6"ø 3/4"ø 1/2"ø S-1 S-1S-1 S-1 S-1 S-1S-1 S-1 S-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 B-1 B-1B-1 B-1B-1 B-1 B-1 B-1B-1 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 4" VTR BUILDING K 2" GAS & 6" SANITARY FROM BUILDINGS C & F,SEE DRAWING ABC-P1.SB FOR CONTINUATION SAN, CW, HW & HWRTO BUILDINGS H & J,SEE DRAWING HK-PB1.1FOR CONTINUATION FCO 1/2"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø 3/4"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø2"ø 3"ø 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1"ø 1"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 3/4"ø SIMILAR TOUNIT G-6 SIMILAR TOUNIT G-7 1/2"ø1/2"ø 2"ø4"ø2"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 2"ø 2 1/2"ø 3"ø L-1 4" VTR 6"ø 3/4"ø 2"ø2"ø 2"ø2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø HP1 HP2 3/4" CONDENSATE DRAINS WITH INDIRECT WASTECONNECTION TO NEAREST SANITARY, VERIFYLOCATION AND ROUTING IN FIELD (TYPICAL) 3/4"ø HP1 HP1 HP1 HP1 HP1 HP1 HP2G 2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø G 2"ø G 3/4"ø3/4"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 2"ø 2"ø 1 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 2"ø 2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø G 3/4"ø3/4"ø 1 1/4"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 2" GAS DN TO BELOW GRADE 2 6"øScale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" G-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLANBUILDING G Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 BFPBFP UNIT H-2 (2 BEDROOM) METERROOM LAUNDRYROOMLOBBY BUILDING H (2) 300 GALLONINDIRECT HOT WATERSTORAGE TANKS,SEE 11/P3.2 FORPIPING DIAGRAM GAS FIRED DOMESTICHOT WATER BOILER UNIT H-1(1 BEDROOM) BOILER AND SPRINKLERROOM JANITOR BUILDING J BUILDING K TMV1 B1 ET1 AS-1 3/4"ø DHWR 1"ø DHW 6"ø W 3/4"ø3/4"ø1 1/2"ø 1 1/4"ø UNIT K-2(1 BEDROOM)UNIT K-4 (1 BEDROOM) UNIT K-1(1 BEDROOM)UNIT K-3(1 BEDROOM) P-1 P-2 3"ø 3/4"ø S-1 L-1 WC-14"ø WFCO1 1/4"ø2"øFD-1 3"ø B-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 3/4" H&CW TO WASHING MACHINESUPPLY MANIFOLD, PROVIDELAUNDRY MATE CONNECTION FOREACH UNIT AS SCHEDULE WMF-1 WMF-1 WMF-1 3/4"ø3/4"ø 3" STANDPIPE FORWASHING MACHINEINDIRECT DRAIN S-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 1"ø DCW 2"ø B-1 WC-1 L-1 L-1 L-1WC-1 WC-1 B-1 B-1 S-1 S-1 S-1 S-1 FCO FCO 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 2 1/2"ø3"ø 4"ø2"ø W1 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 4" VTR 2"ø 4" VTR 2"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø SAN, CW, HW & HWR TOBUILDING G, SEE DRAWINGG-PB1.1 FOR CONTINUATION SAN, CW, HW & HWR TOBUILDING J, SEE DRAWINGJ-PB1.1 FOR CONTINUATION SAN, CW, HW & HWRTO BUILDINGS L & M,SEE DRAWING LM-PB1.1FOR CONTINUATION 3"ø G2"ø HP3 HP3 HP1 HP2 HP1 HP1HP1 HP2 3/4" CONDENSATE DRAINS WITHINDIRECT WASTE CONNECTION TONEAREST SANITARY, VERIFY LOCATIONAND ROUTING IN FIELD (TYPICAL) 1/2"ø1/2"ø 2"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø G G 2 2"ø Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" HK-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLANBLDGS 'H' & 'K' - LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 BUILDING J UNIT J-8 (2 BEDROOM) UNIT J-7(1 BEDROOM) UNIT J-6(2 BEDROOM) UNIT J-3 (2 BEDROOM) UNIT J-2(2 BEDROOM) UNIT J-1 (2 BEDROOM) UNIT J-5(2 BEDROOM) UNIT J-4 (2 BEDROOM) INV. =-6' 2 27/64" FCO3/4"ø 1"ø 3/4"ø 1"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø L-1 B-1WC-1 HP2 L-1 B-1 WC-1 HP2 S-1 S-1 L-1 L-1 HP HP WC-2 WC-1B-1 B-1 BUILDING H S-1 S-1 S-1 S-1 S-1 S-14" VTR 3/4" CONDENSATE DRAINS WITHINDIRECT WASTE CONNECTION TONEAREST SANITARY, VERIFY LOCATIONAND ROUTING IN FIELD (TYPICAL) HP3 HP2 HP1 HP6 L-1 WC-1B-1 L-1WC-1B-1 B-1 WC-1 WC-1WC-1 WC-1B-1B-1 B-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 4" VTR 4" VTR 2"ø 2"ø 3"ø 4" VTR 4" VTR 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø 3"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 3"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1"ø 3/4"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 6"ø 1 1/2"ø 1"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 6"ø 1"ø 3/4"ø 1"ø 6"ø 2"ø 3/4"ø 2"ø 2"ø 3"ø 4"ø 2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 4"ø 1 1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 3"ø 4"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 4"ø 2"ø 3"ø3"ø 2"ø 4"ø 2"ø 2"ø2 1/2"ø2 1/2"ø 1 1/2"ø1 1/2"ø 3"ø3"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 1/2"ø 3" FOECED MAIN SANITARY ACROSS CWILING OF CONNECTOR.CONFIRM SIZE WITH EJECTOR SYSTEM DESIGNER. COORDINATELOCATION, ROUTING AND INSTALLATION WITH ARCHITECTURALAND STRUCTURAL. SEE DRAWING LM-PB1.1 FOR CONTINUATION 3"ø 1 1/2"ø 4" SAN UP TOABOVE CEILING,FURRING BYARCHITECT CO 3" FORCED MAIN SANITARY FROMEJECTOR PIT, SEE SITE UTILITYPLAN FOR CONTINUATION 3"ø 4"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 2"ø 4"ø 1 1/2"ø 2"ø FCO6"ø6" SANITARY OUT TO SERVICEEJECTOR PIT, SEE SITE UTILITYPLAN FOR CONTINUATION 1 1/2"ø 2"ø2"ø 2"ø 4"ø 3"ø3"ø 2"ø4"ø 1 1/2"ø 3"ø3"ø2 1/2"ø2 1/2"ø Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" J-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLANBUILDING 'J' - LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 2 MAINTENANCE OFFICE/ STORAGE PROVIDE 1/2" H&CW AND2" SANITARY CAPPEDFOR FUTURE CONNECTION 1" CW AND 4" SANFROM BUILDING M,SEE BELOW FORCONTINUATION 1" CW FROM BELOW,PROVIDE 3/4" H&CWTO WH-1 WH-1 2 1/2"ø 4"ø 4"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø FCO 3/4"ø 3/4"ø1"ø L-1 WC-1 HP 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 1 1/2"ø 4"ø 1/2"ø 3" VTR 3 3"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø1/2"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 3"ø 3"ø 3"ø 2 1/2"ø2"ø2"ø1 1/4"ø1 1/4"ø1"ø 4"ø1/2"ø 1"ø 1"ø 4"ø 6"ø 6"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø1/2"ø3/4"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 1"ø 1"ø 3/4"ø 1"ø 6"ø 3"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø 3/4"ø B-1 WC-1 L-1 S-1 4" SANITARY FROMBUILDING L, SEEABOVE FORCONTINUATION 1" CW TO BUILDING L,SEE ABOVE FORCONTINUATION 4" SANITARY, 1 1/4"HW AND 3/4" HWRFROM BUILDINGK. SEE DRAWINGHK-PB 1.1 FORCONTINUATION 2" CW FROM BUILDING K.SEE DRAWING HK-PB1.1FOR CONTINUATION 6" SANITARY OUT,SEE SITE UTILITYPLANFOR CONTINUATION 3" CW SERVICE IN,SEE SITE UTILITYPLANFOR CONTINUATION FIRE PROTECTIONSERVICE IN ANDBACKFLOW.SEE DRAWING LM-FP1.1 UNIT M-6(2 BEDROOMS) UNIT M-7(2 BEDROOMS) UNIT M-8(2 BEDROOMS) UNIT M-9(2 BEDROOMS) UNIT M-10(2 BEDROOMS) UNIT M-11(2 BEDROOMS) UNIT M-5(2 BEDROOMS)UNIT M-4(2 BEDROOMS) UNIT M-3(2 BEDROOMS)UNIT M-2(2 BEDROOMS) UNIT M-1(1 BEDROOM) BUILDING M GG L-1 WC-1B-1B-1WC-1 L-1 S-1S-1L-1 WC-1B-1B-1WC-1L-1 S-1 S-1 L-1 S-1 WC-1B-1 S-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 S-1 L-1 WC-1 B-1 S-1 S-1 S-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 B-1 B-1 B-1B-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1WC-1HP2 HP2 HP1 HP1 HP1 HP1 HP1 HP2 HP2 2"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø 2"ø 4" VTR 4" VTR 1 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 2"ø 3/4"ø3/4"ø 1/2"ø 2"ø 4"ø2"ø 3"ø 2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 2"ø4"ø 2"ø 2"ø 4"ø2"ø 1"ø HP2 HP1 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 1/2"ø 1/2"ø1/2"ø 3" FORCED MAIN SANITARY ACROSSCEILING OF CONNECTOR. CONFIRM SIZEWITH EJECTOR SYSTEM DESIGNER.INSTALLATION WITH ARCHITECTURALAND STRUCTURAL. SEE DRAWUNGJ-PB1.1 FOR CONTINUATION 3" FORCED SANITARYMAIN DISCHARGE DNTO 6" SANITARY OUT.PROVIDE CLEANOUTAT BASE OF RISER 6"ø CO 3"ø 1 1/2"1 1/2" 2"1 1/2"2" 4" VTR 2"4" 2 1/2" 4"ø 3"ø 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 4" VTR 1 1/2"1/2"ø1/2"ø 2"4" 2" 1 1/2"ø 2"ø 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 4"ø4"ø 1/2"ø 2"ø 3/4" CONDENSATE DRAIN WITHINDIRECT WASTE CONNECTIONTO NEAREST SANITARY, VERIFYLOCATION AND ROUTING INFIELD (TYPICAL) 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/8" = 1'-0" LM-PB1.1 PLUMBING PLANBUILDINGS L AND M LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 BURNER DATA CONTROL 1. PROVIDE COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAL PLUMBING SYSTEMS INCLUDING ALL NECESSARY MATERIAL, LABOR, AND EQUIPMENT. 2. THE TERM "PROVIDE" SHALL MEAN FURNISH, INSTALL, CONNECT, AND MAKE OPERABLE. 3. THE TERM "INDICATED" SHALL MEAN AS SHOWN IN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS (DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND RELATED ATTACHMENTS). 4. ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL SHALL BE LABELED, LISTED, AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND ARRANGE FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. 6. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY LICENSED WORKMEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 7. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL CODES AND REGULATIONS WHICH MAY APPLY. 8. THE CONTRACTOR MAY SUBSTITUTE EQUIPMENT OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER IF IT IS EQUAL QUALITY AND RATING, SUBJECT TO THE OWNER'S AND ENGINEER'S REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL MANUFACTURER'S CATALOG NUMBERS WITH MANUFACTURERS FOR CURRENT CONFIGURATIONS AND FUNCTIONS. 10. BEFORE SELECTING MATERIALS AND/OR EQUIPMENT AND PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK, INSPECT ALLAREAS TO INSURE SUITABILITY, FIT, CLEARANCES, AND INTERCONNECTIONS. 11. PLUMBING DRAWINGS, PLANS, AND DETAILS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND DO NOT SHOW ALL INTERFERENCESAND CONDITIONS VISIBLE AND/OR HIDDEN THAT MAY EXIST. THE CONTRACTOR MUST VISIT THE JOB SITE TOBECOME FAMILIAR WITH CONDITIONS AND ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDITIONS THEREOF, BEFORE BIDDING AND DURING THE CONDUCT OF WORK. 12. PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH ALL MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTIES FOR EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS PROVIDED. 13. ALL SOIL, WASTE AND DRAIN PIPING SHALL BE BELOW THE FLOOR ON THE PLAN ON WHICH IT ISSHOWN OR BELOW THE SLAB, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14. WATER, VENT AND OTHER SERVICE PIPING SHALL BE RUN AT THE CEILING OF THE PLAN ON WHICH IT IS SHOWN, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 15. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR THE LOCATION AND MOUNTING HEIGHTS OF FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT. 16. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT. 17. ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS SHALL BE BY OWNER APPROVED ROOF CONTRACTORS. COORDINATE WITHOWNER AND ARCHITECT. CD ST G 1.ALL PIPE SIZES ARE FOR SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE ONLY. PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL NECESSARY FITTINGS, ADAPTERS, ECT. TO MAKE FINAL CONNECTION AND COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION. 2.COTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY CHROME SUPPLIES WITH STOPS, CHROME SEMI-CAST PRAPS, PLUMBING FIXTURE SUPPORTS, AND ANY OTHER REQUIRED TRIM FOR INSTALLATION AND PROPER OPERATION OF THE FIXTURES. TYPE FIXTURE SOIL VENT COLD HOT MOUNT DESCRIPTION REMARKS WC-1 WATER CLOSET 4"2"1/2"-FLOOR L-1 LAVATORY 1 1/2"1/2"1/2"1 1/2" S-1 KITCHEN SINK 1/2"COUNTER1 1/2"1 1/2"1/2" FLOOR1/2"1/2"2"3" BATHTUBB-1 SYMBOLS DESCRIPTION P-TRAP CAP 90° ELBOW UP 90° ELBOW DOWN BALL VALVE CLEANOUT FLOOR CLEANOUT WALL CLEANOUT SOIL OR WASTE ABOVE FLOOR OR GRADE SOIL OR WASTE BELOW FLOOR OR GRADE COLD WATER PIPING VENT CONDENSATE PIPING HOT WATER PIPING COUNTER REMARKS WADE MODEL 6004.1-NH, CAST IRON, 4" NO HUB OUTLET, BRONZE GASKETED PLUG, REVERSIBLE CLAMPING COLLAR, ROUND FRAME, NON SLIP COVER WITH VANDAL PROOF SCREWS FLOOR1/2"1/2"2"3"KOHLER K-193(6,7) SHOWER BASE WITH K-9132 CP SHOWER DRAIN AND WITH DELTA MONITOR 13 SERIES SHOWER TRIM, SHOWER VALVE AND HANSGROHE CROMA C-100 SHOWER HEAD. INSTALL KHOLER LATTIS PIVOTSHOWER DOOR IN BRUSHED NICKEL FINISH (NX) SHOWERSH-1 STORM PIPING GAS PIPING KOHLER CIMARRON K-3828/RA, VITREOUS CHINA, ELONGATED BOWL, CANISTER FLUSH VALVE, 1.28 GAL/FLUSH,CACHET QUIET-CLOSE SEAT, ANGLE SUPPLY WITH STOP, POLISHED CHROME TRIP LEVER. KOHLER CANVAS UNDERMOUNT K28740 WITH K9018CP TRAP AND K15241-7-CP FAUCET WITH LOW FLOW AERATOR TWO BAY STAINLESS STEEL SINK, ELKAY ECTC3322104 WITH DELTA 440-WE-DST FAUCET AND SIDE SPRAY. MINIMUM36" CABINET REQUIRED. KOHLER VILLAGER BATH K-715/716, DELTA INNOVATIONS MONITOR SCALD-GUARD TUB AND SHOWERS SINGLEHANDLE VALVE R10000. INSTALL WITH HANSGROHE CROMA C100 GREEN FLOW RATE SHOWER HEAD. INSTALL CANOPYPEVA HEAVYWEIGHT MILDEW RESISTANT SHOWER CURTAIN LINER WITH HEAVY DUTY ROLLER SHOWER CURTAIN RING ONCURVED MOEN DN2155BN STAINLESS STEEL ROD. PROVIDE WALL BLOCKING AND SUBFLOOR. S-2 SERVICE SINK 1/2"FLOOR2"1 1/2"1/2"FIAT MSB2424 WITH 8300AA FAUCET, 3/4" THREADED OUTLET WITH 5' HOSE, MOP RACK, BUCKET HOLDER HOT WATER RE-CIRCULATION PIPING BACKFLOW PREVENTER CO FCO WCO WASHING MACHINE SUPPLY AND WASTE SYSTEM, SINGLE LEVER SUPPLY CUTOFF, 1/2" H&CW, 2" INDIRECT WASTE SERVING SYMMONS/6-400 35 SYMMONS/TEMPTROL 3.2BATHROOMS 2"/2" 1/2" / 1/2" 15 15 WC-2 WATER CLOSET 4"2"1/2"-FLOOR KOHLER CIMARRON K-3828/RA, VITREOUS CHINA, ELONGATED BOWL, CANISTER FLUSH VALVE, 1.28 GAL/FLUSH,CACHET QUIET-CLOSE SEAT, ANGLE SUPPLY WITH STOP, POLISHED CHROME TRIP LEVER. L-2 LAVATORY 1 1/2"1/2"1/2"1 1/2"WALL AMERICAN STANDARD 0355.012 WITH 2385.049 SINGLE LEVER SUPPLY WITH POPUP AND TAILPIECE, 17 GA.,ADJUSTABLE P-TRAP, FLEX SUPPLIES AND ANGLE STOPS FLOOR CLEANOUT ROOF DRAIN SYMMONS LAUNDRY MATE REMARKS TYPESYMBOL TMV-1 LOCATION FLOWRATE(GPM) INLET/OUTLET SIZE PRESSUREDIFFERENTIAL(PSI) TMV-2 MANUFACTURER/ MODEL NUMBER DOMESTICHOT WATER SHOWER MIXINGVALVE DOMESTIC WATERBOILER ROOMS 1"1240AMTROL/THERM-X-TROLET-1 ACCEPTANCEFACTORMAX TANK VOL GALMANUFACTURER/MODEL NO.SYMBOL SYSTEMCONNECTION ET-2 DOMESTIC COLD WATER PROVIDE MATCHING LINE SIZEAIR SEPARATOR DOMESTIC HOT WATERAMTROL/THERM-X-TROL 1"2680 PROVIDE MATCHING LINE SIZEAIR SEPARATOR SET TEMPERATURE TO PRODUCE MAXIMUM. 110°F ATFARTHEST FIXTURE, BRASS AND BRONZE CONSTRUCTION SET AT MAXIMUM 110°F DISCHARGE REMARKSDESCRIPTIONSYMBOL WOODFORD #B65-CH, FREEZELESS, VACUUM BREAKER HOSE CONNECTION, LOCKABLE CHROME BOXHOSE BIBHB-1 WADE #1103STD6, OUTLET SIZE AS INDICATED ON PLANS, CAST IRON BODY, NICKEL BRONZE STRAINER, 4" DEEP SEAL TRAPFLOOR DRAINFD-1 PROVIDE PROSET TRAP GUARD OR APPROVED EQUAL 4 3 1A 3 4B 2C 2D 2A 1D 4B 4 1B 2B 3 1 2 4 3 1 2 4 4 FCO RD-1 WMF-1 B-1 NUMBER LOCATION TYPE CAMUS/DR600 MANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBER REMARKSBOILER DATA 60095.1%564 HEATING CAPACITY (MBH)QTY 1 TYPE (5 TO 1) MODULATINGNATURAL GAS FUEL HP - VOLT 115 1.5 AMP MOTOR ∅ 1 VOLT 115CONDENSING A.F.U.E.INPUT OUTPUT REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS PUMP TYPES: DS=DOUBLE SUCTION, HS=HORIZONTALMSPLIT, ES=BASE MOUNTED CENTRIFUGAL BASE SUCTION, IL=IN LINE MODEL NUMBER RPM PUMPTYPE 1641 IL FLUID WATER GPM 115 HEAD(FT) 40 2 1750 HP VOLT 208 PH 3 REMARKS BOILER CIRCULATOR MOTOR DATA 009 IL WATER 6 15 1/8 3250 115 1 HOT WATER RECIRCULATOR MANUFACTURERSYMBOLLOCATION P-1 DOMESTIC WATER BOILER ROOMS TACO P-2 TACO 2 TYPICAL FLOOR MOUNT PLUMBING FIXTURE FIRE STOPPING DETAILS 1 TYPICAL PLUMBING PIPING FIRE STOPPING DETAILS DOMESTIC WATERBOILER ROOMS DOMESTIC WATER BOILER ROOMSBUILDINGS 'B' & 'H' SECTION A-A A A SECURED TO UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR USING THE ANCHOR HOOKS PROVIDED WITH THE COLLAR. (MINIMUM 2 ANCHOR HOOKS FOR 1-1/2 AND 2 IN. DIAM PIPES AND 3 ANCHOR HOOKS FOR 3 AND 4 IN. DIAM PIPES). THE ANCHOR HOOKS ARE TO BE SYMMETRICALLY INSTALLED AND SECURED TO THE SURFACE OF FLOOR WITH MIN NO. 12 MIN 3/4 IN. LONG WOOD SCREWS AND WASHERS. HILTI CONSTRUCTION CHEMICALS, DIV OF HILTI INC -- CP 643 50/1.5 "N , CP 643 63/2 "N , CP 643 90/3 "N OR CP 643 110/4 "N FIRESTOP COLLAR *BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARK 2. CHASE WALL -- THE THROUGH PENETRANT (ITEM 3) SHALL BE ROUTED THROUGH A FIRE-RATED SINGLE, DOUBLE OR STAGGERED WOOD A. STUDS -- NOM 2 BY 6 IN. OR DOUBLE NOM 2 BY 4 IN. LUMBER STUDS. B. SOLE PLATE -- NOM 2 BY 6 IN. OR PARALLEL 2 BY 4 IN. LUMBER PLATES, TIGHTLY BUTTED. C. TOP PLATE -- THE DOUBLE TOP PLATE SHALL CONSIST OF TWO NOM 2 BY 6 IN. OR TWO SETS OF PARALLEL 2 BY 4 IN. LUMBER PLATES, TIGHTLY BUTTED. MAX DIAM OF OPENINGS IS 5 IN. D. GYPSUM BOARD* -- THICKNESS, TYPE, NUMBER OF LAYERS AND FASTENERS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL WALL AND PARTITION DESIGN. 3. THROUGH-PENETRANTS -- ONE NONMETALLIC PIPE, CONDUIT OR TUBING TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE FIRESTOP SYSTEM. DIAM OF OPENINGS ASSEMBLIES, THE T RATING IS 2 HR FOR 1-1/2 IN. DIAM (AND SMALLER) PIPES AND 1-1/2 HR FOR PIPES GREATER THAN 1-1/2 IN. DIAM. FOR 1 HR RATED ASSEMBLIES, THE T RATING IS 1 HR FOR 1-1/2 IN. DIAM (AND SMALLER) PIPES, 3/4 HR FOR 2 IN. DIAM PIPES AND 0 HR FOR PIPES GREATER THAN 2 IN. DIAM. THE FOLLOWING TYPES AND SIZES OF NONMETALLIC PIPES MAY BE USED: A. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE -- NOM 4 IN. DIAM (OR SMALLER) SCHEDULE 40 SOLID CORE OR CELLULAR CORE PVC PIPE FOR USE IN CLOSED (PROCESS OR SUPPLY) OR VENTED (DRAIN, WASTE OR VENT) PIPING SYSTEM B. CHLORINATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (CPVC) PIPE -- NOM 4 IN. DIAM (OR SMALLER) SDR17 CPVC PIPE FOR USE IN CLOSED (PROCESS OR SUPPLY) OR VENTED (DRAIN, WASTE OR VENT) PIPING SYSTEMS. C. ACRYLONITRILE BUTADIENE STYRENE (ABS) PIPE -- NOM 4 IN. DIAM (OR SMALLER) SCHEDULE 40 SOLID-CORE OR CELLULAR CORE ABS PIPE FOR USE IN CLOSED (PROCESS OR SUPPLY) OR VENTED (DRAIN, WASTE OR VENT) PIPING SYSTEMS. D. FLAME RETARDANT POLYPROPYLENE (FRPP) PIPE -- NOM 4 IN. DIAM (OR SMALLER) SCHEDULE 40 FRPP PIPE FOR USE IN CLOSED (PROCESS OR SUPPLY) OR VENTED (DRAIN, WASTE OR VENT) PIPING SYSTEM. 4. FIRESTOP SYSTEM -- THE DETAILS OF THE FIRESTOP SYSTEM SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: A. STEEL COLLAR -- COLLAR FABRICATED FROM PRECUT 0.017 IN. THICK (28 MSG) GALV STEEL AVAILABLE FROM SEALANT MANUFACTURER. COLLAR SHALL BE MIN 2 IN. DEEP WITH A MIN 1-1/4 IN. WIDE BY 2 IN. LONG ANCHOR TABS FOR SECUREMENT TO FLOOR SURFACE. RETAINER TABS 1-1/4 IN. WIDE BY 3/4 IN. LONG AND LOCATED OPPOSITE THE ANCHOR TABS ARE FOLDED 90 DEG TOWARDS THE PIPE SURFACE TO MAINTAIN THE ANNULAR SPACE AROUND THE PIPE AND TO RETAIN THE FILL MATERIAL. FOR \ NOM 2 IN. DIAM (OR SMALLER) PVC AND CPVC PIPES IN 1 HR RATED ASSEMBLIES, RETAINER TAB LENGTH MAY BE REDUCED TO 1/2 IN. COLLAR SECURED TO THE SURFACE OF FLOOR WITH WOOD SCREWS AND WASHERS AT EVERY OTHER ANCHOR TAB. A NOM 1/2 IN. WIDE STAINLESS STEEL HOSE CLAMP SHALL BE SECURED TO THE COLLAR AT MID-DEPTH. B. FILL, VOID OR CAVITY MATERIAL* -- SEALANT -- MIN 3/4 IN. THICKNESS OF FILL MATERIAL APPLIED WITHIN THE ANNULUS, FLUSH WITH TOP SURFACE OF THE FLOOR. MIN 1/2 IN. THICKNESS OF FILL MATERIAL APPLIED WITHIN THE ANNULUS FLUSH WITH THE BOTTOM SURFACE OF THE LOWER PLATE. FILL MATERIAL ALSO INSTALLED TO COMPLETELY FILL THE STEEL COLLAR. 1. FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY -- THE 1 OR 2 HR FIRE-RATED SOLID OR TRUSSED LUMBER JOIST FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTEDOF THE MATERIALS AND IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED IN THE INDIVIDUAL L500 SERIES FLOOR-CEILING DESIGNS IN THE UL FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY. THE F RATING OF THE FIRESTOP SYSTEM IS EQUAL TO THE RATING OF THE FLOOR-CEILING AND WALL ASSEMBLIES. THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTIONFEATURES OF THE FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY ARE SUMMARIZED BELOW: A. FLOORING SYSTEM -- LUMBER OR PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR WITH FINISH FLOOR OF LUMBER, PLYWOOD OR FLOOR TOPPING MIXTURE* AS SPECIFIED IN THE INDIVIDUAL FLOOR-CEILING DESIGN. MAX DIAM OF FLOOR OPENING IS 5 IN. B. JOISTS -- NOM 10 IN. DEEP (OR DEEPER) LUMBER, STEEL OR COMBINATION LUMBER AND STEEL JOISTS, TRUSSES OR STRUCTURAL WOOD MEMBERS* WITH BRIDGING AS REQUIRED AND WITH END FIRESTOPPED C. FURRING CHANNELS -- (NOT SHOWN) -- (NOT SHOWN) (AS REQUIRED) - RESILIENT GALVANIZED STEEL FURRING INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANNER SPECIFIED IN THE INDIVIDUAL L500 SERIES DESIGNS IN THE FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY. D. GYPSUM BOARD* -- THICKNESS, TYPE, NUMBER OF LAYERS AND FASTENERS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN THE INDIVIDUAL FLOOR-CEILING DESIGN, MAX DIAM OF OPENING IS 5 IN. 1.FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY - THE 1 HR FIRE-RATED SOLID OR TRUSSED LUMBER JOIST FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF THE MATERIALS AND IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED IN THE INDIVIDUAL L500 SERIES FLOOR-CEILING DESIGNS IN THE UL FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY.THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES OF THE FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY ARE SUMMARIZED BELOW: A.FLOORING SYSTEM - LUMBER OR PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR WITH FINISH FLOOR OF LUMBER, PLYWOOD OR FLOOR TOPPING MIXTURE* ASSPECIFIED IN THE INDIVIDUAL FLOOR-CEILING DESIGN. MAX DIAM OF OPENING SHALL BE 5 IN. B.WOOD JOISTS* - NOM 10 IN. DEEP (OR DEEPER) LUMBER, STEEL OR COMBINATION LUMBER AND STEEL JOISTS, TRUSSES ORSTRUCTURAL WOOD MEMBERS* WITH BRIDGING AS REQUIRED AND WITH ENDS FIRESTOPPED. C.GYPSUM BOARD* - NOM 5/8 IN. THICK, 4 FT WIDE AS SPECIFIED IN THE INDIVIDUAL FLOOR-CEILING DESIGN. 2.CLOSET FLANGE - ACRYLONITRILE BUTADIENE STYRENE (ABS) OR POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) CLOSET STUB SIZED TO ACCOMMODATE DRAIN PIPE.CLOSET FLANGE INSTALLED OVER DRAIN PIPING WITHIN FLOOR OPENING WITH FLANGE SECURED TO PLYWOOD FLOOR WITH STEEL SCREWS. ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN CLOSET FLANGE AND PERIPHERY OF OPENING SHALL BE 1/4 IN. 3.DRAIN PIPING - NOM 4 IN. DIAM SCHEDULE 40 ACRYLONITRILE BUTADIENE STYRENE (ABS) OR POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) DRAIN PIPE AND 90 DEGREE ELBOW FOR USE IN VENTED (DRAIN, WASTE OR VENT) PIPING SYSTEMS. PIPE INSTALLED CONCENTRICALLY WITHIN FIRESTOP SYSTEM. 4.FILL, VOID OR CAVITY MATERIALS* - SEALANT - MIN 3/4 IN. THICKNESS OF FILL MATERIAL APPLIED WITHIN THE ANNULUS,FLUSH WITH THE BOTTOM SURFACE OF FLOOR. HILTI CONSTRUCTION CHEMICALS, DIV OF HILTI INC - CP 606 FLEXIBLE FIRESTOP SEALANT OR FS-ONE SEALANT 5.WATER CLOSET - (NOT SHOWN) - FLOOR MOUNTED VITREOUS CHINA WATER CLOSET. L53.8597;*BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARK (MAINTAIN FLOOR SYSTEM FIRE RATING)RUN PIPING IN JOIST AS REQURED IN AREAS ABOVE SOFFITS THROUGH FLOORING SYSTEM MAX 1/2 IN. LARGER THAN THE OUTSIDE DIAM OF THROUGH-PENETRANT. PIPE OR CONDUIT TO BE RIGIDLY SUPPORTED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY. THE T RATING IS DEPENDENT ON THE SIZE OF THE THROUGH-PENETRANT. FOR 2 HR RATED STUD/GYPSUM WALLBOARD CHASE WALL HAVING A FIRE RATING CONSISTENT WITH THAT OF THE FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY. THE CHASE WALL SHALLBE CONSTRUCTED OF THE MATERIALS AND IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED IN THE INDIVIDUAL U300 SERIES WALL AND PARTITION DESIGNS IN THE ULFIRERESISTANCE DIRECTORY AND SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTIONFEATURES: C. FIRESTOP DEVICE* -- FIRESTOP COLLAR -- AS AN ALTERNATE TO ITEM A FILLED WITH B ABOVE. FIRESTOP COLLAR SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCOMPANYING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. COLLAR TO BE INSTALLED AND LATCHED AROUND THE PIPE AND PLUMBING FIXTURE SCHEDULE PLUMBING PIPING AND SYMBOLS ELECTRICAL DATA KW VOLT PH TYPESYMMANUFACTURERMODEL NUMBER ELECTRIC WATER HEATER SCHEDULE REMARKSLOCATION WH-1 BUILDING 'F'A.O.SMITH ECT 40 ELECTRIC 40 -21 4500 6000 5 240 1 8" DEEP 17 GAUGE WATER TIGHT PAN, WITH 3/4" DRAIN RECOVERY INGPH @ 90°FRISE MAXIMUM STORE INGALS. HEAD(FT) PLUMBING COMPONENTS SCHEDULE WH-2 GENERAL PLUMBING NOTES NOTES:1.PROVIDE FACTORY MOUNTED CONTROL CIRCUIT TRANSFORMER FOR STEPPING DOWN LINE VOLTAGE TO CONTROL VOLTAGE. POWER WIRING BY ELECTRICIAN, CONTROL WIRING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. DOMESTIC HOT WATER BOILERS-BURNERS SCHEDULE THERMOSTATIC TEMPERING VALVE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE OF PUMPS BUILDING 'L'A.O.SMITH ECT 40 ELECTRIC 40 -21 4500 6000 5 240 1 8" DEEP 17 GAUGE WATER TIGHT PAN, WITH 3/4" DRAIN STANDARD ELEMENT WATTAGE SCHEDULE OF EXPANSION TANKS PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR INTAKE AND FLUE EXHAUST TO TERMINAL KIT, MATERIAL AND SIZE ASPER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 2 2 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CT 1/4" = 1'-0" P2.1 PLUMBINGSCHEDULES, NOTES, SYMBOLS ANDDETAILS Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2017 16-063 No.Description Date Final Const Doc's 10/12/18 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 GFIGFIGFI GFI FF GFI GFIGFIGFIFF F J GFIJGFI GFIGFIGFIJGFIS FF S S J S S GFIGFI GFIGFI J GFI J S S GFI GFIGFIGFIGFI JGFI GFIGFI GFIGFIJ GFIGFIGFI GFI GFIJ GFIGFIJ J FFFF GFI J S S S TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV S S TV TV BUILDING D BUILDING B LEVEL 1 BUILDING C BUILDING G BUILDING A LEVEL 1 UNIT A-1(2 BEDROOM) UNIT A-2(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-3(1 BEDROOM)TYPE 'A' UNIT B-4(2 BEDROOM) UNIT B-5(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-6(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-7(STUDIO) UNIT A-2(2 BEDROOM) TPB7 TPB7 - 3 TPB4 - 1 TPB4 - 2 TPB4 - 3 TPB4 - 14 TPB4 - 4 TPB4 - 9 TPB4 - 7 11 1 TPA2 - 1 2 2 2 TPA2 - 2 TPA2 - 3 4 TPA2 - 4 5 5 4 TPA2 9 TPA2 - 9 TPA2 - 5 TPA2 - 6,8 TPA2 - 7 TPA2 - 11,13 KEF 2 HP1 TPA2 - 12 HPB1 - 17 HPB1 - 17 HP1 TPA1 - 1 1 1 1 1 TPA1 - 22 2 2 2 TPA1 - 3 4 TPA1 - 4 5 5 TPA1 - 5 TPA1 - 6,8 TPA1 - 7 TPA1 - 9 TPA1 - 11,13 HP1 TPA2 2 2 5 1 1 TPA2 - 1 TPA2 - 2 TPA2 - 3 4 TPA2 - 4 5 TPA2 - 5 TPA2 - 6,8TPA2 - 7 TPA2 - 9 TPA2 - 11,13 14 1414 TPA2 - 14 22 1 1 11 2 TPB7 - 1 TPB7 - 4 4 TPB7 - 5 TPB7 - 6,8 TPB7 - 7 TPB7 - 9 HP6 TPB7 - 11,13 TPB6 1 1 1 TPB6 - 1 22 2 2 TPB6 - 2 TPB6 - 3 HP1 4 4 4 55 TPB6 - 6,8 TPB6 - 7TPB6 - 9 TPB6 - 11,13 55 TPB4 - 5 4 4 11 1 2 2 2 14 14 HP6 TPB5 1 1 1 2 2 2 HP6 TPB5 - 2 TPB5 - 3 4 4 55 TPB5 - 6,8 TPB5 - 7 TPB5 - 9 TPB5 - 11,13 TPB5 - 5 14 TPB4 - 6,8 TPB4 - 11,13 TPB4 TPB3 1 11 1 TPB3 - 1 2 2 22 TPB3 - 2 4 TPB3 - 3 55 5 TPB3 - 5 TPB3 - 6,8 TPB3 - 7 4 TPB3 - 9 1 TPB3 - 4 HP2 TPB3 - 11,13 TPA2 - 12 TPA2 - 15 TPA1 TPA1 - 12 14 14 14 14 TPA1 - 14 TPA1 - 15 EF KEF 1 TPB5 - 1 TPB5 - 4 S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO 1A * 1A * 1A * 1A * FAAP HPB-19 EF-1 1A * 1A * HPB1 - 17 1A * S/CO S/CO S/CO 1A * INDICATED CIRCUIT # INASSOC. APARTMENTTENANT. PANEL (TP) TYP 2 TS FS 2 EWH-1 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, CONCEPT 90% CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-EP1.1 ELECTRICALPOWER PLANBLDGS A-B-C - LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 GFI J GFIJ FF S GFI GFI GFIGFIJ GFIGFIGFIGFIGFI J GFIGFIGFI GFI GFI GFIJ S S S S S TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV S J UNIT B-8(1 BEDROOM)TYPE A UNIT B-9(2 BEDROOM) UNIT B-10(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-11(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-12(1 BEDROOM) BUILDING B LEVEL 2 BUILDING BUILDING A BUILDING BUILDING TPB9 TPB9 - 1 1 1 1 TPB9 - 2 2 2 2 TPB9 - 3 54 4 5 5 TPB9 - 5TPB9 - 6,8 TPB9 - 7 TPB9 - 9 TPB9 - 11,13 HP6 14 14 14 TPB9 - 14 TPB10 1 1 1TPB10 - 1 2 4 TPB10 - 4 5 5 TPB10 - 6,8 TPB10 - 7 2 TPB10 - 2 TPB10 - 4 TPB10 - 11,13 HPB1 - 18 18 2 1 2 2 2 TPB8 - 2 TPB8 - 3 44 5 5 TPB8 - 6,8 TPB8 - 7 TPB8 TPB8 - 4 5 5 2 1 11 1 TPB8 - 9 TPB10 - 5 TPB10 - 9 TPB11 1 1 1 TPB11 - 1 22 2 TPB11 - 2 TPB11 - 3 4 4TPB11 - 4 TPB10 - 3 TPB11 - 5 5 TPB11 - 6,8 TPB11 - 7 TPB11 - 9 TPB11 - 11,13 1 1 1 TPB12 - 1 2 2 2 2 TPB12 - 2 TPB12 - 3 4 TPB12 - 4 5 TPB12 - 5 TPB12 - 6,8 TPB12 - 7 4 TPB12 TPB12 - 95 TPB12 - 11,13 TPB8 - 11,13 1A * 1 1 1 1 1 S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO 1A * 1A * HP 1A * HP HP HP 1A * 1A * TS FS 2 2 TPB12 - 12 EWH-5 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-EP1.2 ELECTRICALPOWER PLANBLDGS A-B-C - LEVEL 2 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 GFIGFIGFIJ GFI GFIJ FFGFIGFI GFI GFI GFIGFIS S J F GFI GFI GFI GFIGFIGFI J GFIGFIGFIGFIJ GFI GFIGFIGFIS S S S J GFIGFIGFIGFIGFI J S SS GFIGFIGFI GFI GFI GFIS S J GFI GFIGFIGFIS J TV TV TV TV TV TV TVTV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV S J BUILDING G BUILDING D BUILDING B LEVEL 3 BUILDING C BUILDING A LEVEL 2 UNIT A-4(1 BEDROOM)H.C. UNIT A-5(1 BEDROOM) UNIT A-6(2 BEDROOM)H.C. UNIT B-13(1 BEDROOM)TYPE A UNIT B-14(2 BEDROOM) UNIT B-15(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-16(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-17(1 BEDROOM) HP2 TPB14 1 1 1 TPB14 - 1 2 2 2 2 TPB14 - 3 TPB14 - 2 4 TPB14 - 4 5 5 TPB14 - 5 TPB14 - 6,8 TPB14 - 7 TPB14 - 9 TPB14 - 11,13 TPB14 - 14 14 14 14 TPB15 1 11 1 TPB15 - 1 2 2 TPB15 - 3 4 TPB15 - 4 5 5 TPB15 - 5 TPB15 - 6,8 TPB15 - 7 TPB15 - 2 TPB15 - 9 TPB15 - 11,13 HP1 TPA6 TPA6 - 1 1 1 12 2 2 TPA6 - 2 TPA6 - 3 TPA6 - 4 4 5 5 TPA6 - 6,8 TPA6 - 7 TPA6 - 11,13 TPA6 - 9 14 14 14 14 KEF TPA6 - 12 HPB1 - 19 19 HP1 TPA4 TPA4 - 1 1 1 1 2 2 2TPA4 - 2 TPA4 - 3 44 TPA4 - 4 TPA4 - 5 TPA4 - 6,8 TPA4 - 7 TPA4 - 9 TPA4 - 11,13 HP1 TPA5 TPA5 - 1 11 1 TPA5 - 2 2 2 2 TPA5 - 3 4 4 TPA5 - 4 5 TPA5 - 5 TPA5 - 6,8 TPA5 - 7 TPA5 - 9 TPA5 - 11,13 TPB17 1 1 TPB17 - 2 2 2 22 TPB17 - 3 4 TPB17 - 4 TPB17 - 5 4 5 TPB17 - 6,8 TPB17 - 7 HP2 2 TPB17 - 9 TPB17 - 11,13 HP2 TPB16 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 TPB16 - 2 TPB16 - 3 4 4 4 TPB16 - 4 5 TPB16 - 6,8TPB16 - 5 TPB16 - 7 TPB16 - 9 TPB16 - 11,13 TPB13 TPB13 - 1 1 11 1 2 2 2 2 2 TPB13 - 2 TPB13 - 3 TPB13 - 4 44 55TPB13 - 5 5 TPB13 - 6,8 TPB13 - 7 TPB13 - 9 HP2 TPB13 - 11,13 HP2 1 19 TS FS S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 11 1 1 TPB17 - 14 2 EWH-6 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-EP1.3 ELECTRICALPOWERPLAN BLDGS A-B-C- LEVEL 3 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 GFI J GFIGFIGFI GFI GFI GFIS J GFI GFIGFIGFIS J GFIS GFIGFIGFIGFIGFI J S S S J GFI F F TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV FF S S J BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING B LEVEL 4 BUILDING BUILDING A BUILDING UNIT B-18(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-19(2 BEDROOM) UNIT B-20(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-21(1 BEDROOM) UNIT B-22(1 BEDROOM) ATTIC SPACE KEF TPB19 1 1 TPB19 - 11 2 TPB19 - 2 2 2 TPB19 - 3 4 TPB19 - 4 55 TPB19 - 6,8 TPB19 - 7 TPB19 - 5 TPB19 - 9 TPB19 - 12 TPB19 - 11,13 14 14 14 TPB19 - 14 TPB18 - 1 1 11 1 2 2 2 2 2 TPB18 - 3 TPB18 - 2 55 444 TPB18 - 6,8 TPB18 - 9 1 1 1 25 TPB22 - 3 4 TPB22 - 44 5 TPB22 - 6,8 HP6 2 TPB22 - 9 1 11 TPB20 - 1 2 TPB20 - 6,8TPB20 - 5 TPB21 - 2 TPB21 - 3 2 TPB21 - 4 TPB21 - 6,8 TPB21 - 7 TPB18 - 4 TPB18 - 5 TPB18 - 7 TPB18 TPB18 - 11,13 TPB20 1 2 2 TPB20 - 2 TPB20 - 3 4 4 5 5 TPB20 - 7TPB20 - 9 TPB20 - 11,13 TPB21 1 11TPB21 - 1 2 2 4 4 5 5 TPB21 - 9 10 TPB21 - 11,13 TPB22 TPB22 - 1 TPB22 - 2 2 2 5 TPB22 - 7 10 TPB22 - 11,13 HPB1 - 20 20 HPB1 - 29 ERV2 IN BATTIC HP4 IN B ATTIC HPB1 - 30,32 HP6 HP6 HP6 HP6 1 1 1 TS FS S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 TPB22 - 12 2 HPB1 - 34 DRYER BOOSTER FANIN ATTIC 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-EP1.4 ELECTRICALPOWER PLANBLDGS A-B-C - LEVEL 4 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 FF FF J GFIGFIGFIGFIGFIGFI GFIGFIGFIGFIGFIGFIGFIGFIGFIGFI GFIGFI GFIJ J J GFI GFIJ J GFIGFIS S S S S TV TV TV TV TV TV S S S S S S TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV MMMMS J JJ J UNIT B-1(2 BEDROOM)TYPE A UNIT B-2(2 BEDROOM) UNIT C-3(2 BEDROOM)TYPE A UNIT C-4(2 BEDROOM)TYPE A ELEVATOR 1 BUILDING B LEVEL B BUILDING C LEVEL 2BUILDING A CRAWL SPACE BUILDING G BUILDING D HPB1 - 5 HPB1 - 6 HPB1 - 7 HPB1 - 8 HPB1 - 9,11 HPB1 - 13,15HPB1 - 10,12 HPB1 - 14,16 TPC4 TPC4 - 1 1 11 TPC4 - 22 2 2 2 TPC4 - 3 44 TPC4 - 4 5 5 TPC4 - 6,8 TPC4 - 7 TPC4 - 9 TPC4 - 11,13 TPC4 - 14 14 14 EF-1 TPB2 TPB1 TPC3 HP-2 2 2 TPB2 - 2 2 2 TPB2 - 1 1 1 114 14 14 TPB2 - 14 TPB2 - 4 TPB2 - 9 TPB2 - 5TPB2 - 7 TPB2 - 6,8 TPB2 - 11,13 554 4 TPB2 - 312 TPB1 - 2 TPB1 - 1 TPB1 - 5 TPB1 - 7 TPB1 - 4 TPB1 - 6,8 TPB1 - 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 4 4 1 1 114 14 14 TPB1 - 14 TPB1 - 11,13 12 TPC3 - 1 TPC3 - 4 TPC3 - 14 TPC3 - 2 TPC3 - 7 TPC3 - 3 TPC3 - 6,8 TPC3 - 9 TPC3 - 5 2 2 2 2 14 14 14 14 1 1 1 5 TPC3 - 11,134 4 4 4 HPB1 - 4 HPB - 12,14,16 ERV-1 HP-5 HPB1 - 22 HPB1 - 21,23 TPC4 - 12 TPC4 - 15 TPC3 - 12 EF-1 HP EF-1 HP EF 1A * 1A *1A * 1A *1A * 1A * TPB1 - 9 S/CO S/COS/CO S/CO HPB1 - 33 DENOTES CIRCUIT # FOR RECEPTACLEOUTLETS IN ASSOCIATED APARTMENTSTENANT PANEL TS FS 2 2 EWH-3 HPB - 22 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-EP1.B ELECTRICALPOWER PLANBLDGS B-C - LEVEL B Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 UP UP GFIGFIGFI FF GFIF F FFF F FFFFFFFF FFGFIGFIGFIGFI J GFI GFI GFI GFI GFI GFIJ S S S S J TV TV TV TV TV S J J J UNIT C-1(2 BEDROOM) UNIT C-2(2 BEDROOM) STAIR 2 ELECTRICALMETER ROOM MAINTENANCE ROOM BOILER ROOM SPRINKLER ROOM BUILDING B LEVEL SB BUILDING C LEVEL 1 BUILDING A (ABOVE) BUILDING D BUILDING G TPC1 TPC1 - 1 TPC2 TPC2 - 1 TPC2 - 14 TPC2 - 3 TPC1 - 2 TPC1 - 3 TPC1 - 14 HPB1 - 1 HPB1 - 2 HPB1 - 3 AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH(ATS1) GENERATOR DS(GDS1) MAIN DEVICE W/MCB SQUARE D EZM 31200 CBU 1200 AMP,208V/120V/3D/4W, FED FROM UTILITY TRANSFORMER SEESHEET E2.2 HPB1 HPB TPC1 - 9 TPC1 - 5 TPC1 - 11,13 TPC1 - 12 TPC1 - 4 TPC1 - 7 TPC2 - 5 TPC2 - 9 TPC2 - 4 TPC2 - 6,8 TPC2 - 7 TPC2 - 12 TPC2 - 11,13 TPC2 - 15 HP EF EF-1 TPC1 - 15 TPC1 - 6,8 HPB1 - 31 HPB - 13,15,17 BRANCH DEVICE, 5 METER SOCKET. RINGLESSWITH HORN BYPASS & 100 AMP CB, MODEL EZMH316(TYP OF 8) PLUS A 3 METER SOCKET COLUMN H1 HPB - 2 SECURITY HEAD ENDRACK- SEE SECURITYDWGS S/CO S/CO P1 P2 B1 1B TS FS FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL(FACP) S/CO 2 STRUCTURED MEDIAENCLOSURE (DEMARK) 2 HPB - 20 HPB - 19,21 HPB - 18 EWH-1 EUH-1 EWH-2 2 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" ABC-EP1.SB ELECTRICALPOWER PLANBLDG B-C - LEVEL SB Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 UP GFIGFIGFIS S S J J F F FF FF FF TV TV TV TV TV JJ J J DNDN DN DNDN DN GFIJGFIJ FFFF GFI J S S S S S S FF GFI J GFI TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV BUILDING D UNIT D-1(2 BEDROOM) UNIT D-2(1 BEDROOM) RECEPTION OFFICE KITCHEN OFFICE WAITINGAREA HC LAV. JAN. MECH'L CONFROOM FITNESSROOM BUILDING E HPE HPE - 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 HPE - 2 3 HPE - 3 HPE - 4 HPE - 5 5 7 HPE - 7 HPE - 8 HP1 TPD1 TPD2 TPD1 - 11 1 1 2 2 222 TPD1 - 3 4 9 TPD1 - 4 5 TPD1 - 5 TPD1 - 6,8 TPD1 - 7 4 TPD1 - 2 TPD1 - 11,13 14 14 14 TPD1 - 14 11 1 1 TPD2 - 1 2 2 2 TPD2 - 2 TPD2 - 3 TPD2 - 4 445 TPD2 - 6,8 TPD2 - 7 TPD2 - 9 5 TPD2 - 5 10TPD2 - 11,13 HPE - 12,14 HPE - 13,15TPD1 - 12 TPD1 - 15 TPD2 - 15 TPD2 - 12 H2 HPE - 16 SECURITY HEADEND RACK HPE - 17 H3 SECURITY HEAD END RACK S/CO S/CO 2 2 2 2 2 HPE - 18 TPD1 - 16 2 EWH-8 TPD2 - 14 2 HPE - 19 EWH-12 2 BUILDING D BUILDING E UNIT D-3(2 BEDROOM) UNIT D-4(1 BEDROOM) UNIT E-2(2 BEDROOM)UNIT E-3(2 BEDROOM) TPE3 TPE3 - 1 TPE3 - 2 TPE3 - 3 TPE3 - 4 TPE3 - 5TPE3 - 6,8 TPE3 - 7 TPE3 - 9 2 2 2 5 5 5 14 14 14 TPE3 - 14 TPE3 - 11,13 HP1 TPE3 - 12 1 1 1 1 TPD4 - 11,13 TPD4 1 1 1 1 TPD4 - 2 2 2 2 TPD4 - 4 TPD4 - 5 TPD4 - 9 TPD4 - 7 4 5 TPD4 - 3 5TPD4 - 5 TPD4 - 6,8 TPD4 - 12 TPD3 1 1 1 TPD3 - 1 TPD3 - 2 2 2 2 2 TPD3 - 3 4 4 TPD3 - 4 TPD3 - 55 TPD3 - 6,8 TPD3 - 7 TPD3 - 9 TPD3 - 11,13 14 14 14 TPD3 - 14 TPE2 1 1 1 TPE2 - 1 2 2 2 2 TPE2 - 2 TPE2 - 3 44 TPE2 - 6,8 5 5TPE2 - 5 TPE2 - 7 TPE2 - 9 TPE2 - 4 4 TPE2 - 11,13 10 TPD4 - 15 TPD3 - 15TPD3 - 12 TPE2 - 12 TPE2 - 15 TPE3 - 15 S/COS/CO 2 2 2 2 2 22 S/CO S/CO 2 2 2 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" DE-EP1.1 ELECTRICALPOWER PLANBLDGS D-E - LEVELS 1 AND 2 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 F TS IA IA FSSS S/CO IAS EOL 2 N.T.S. FIRE ALARM PANEL DETAIL FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL WITH VOICE EVAC (FACP) BASEMENT 3/4" RACEWAY AND WIRINGTO TELEPHONE SERVICE.TO CONNECT TO FD * 20A- IPPOWER CONNECTION INITIATION CIRCUITS TYPICAL INITIATION DEVICESMANUAL PULL STATIONS SMOKEAND CO DETECTORS. REFER TOPLANS FOR QUANTITIES ANDLOCATION TYPICAL NOTIFICATION DEVICESSPEAKER STROBES, SPEAKERS,AND STROBES. REFER TO PLANSFOR QUANTITY AND LOCATION TYPICAL ENDOF THE LINERESISTOR TYPICAL AUDIO/VISUAL CIRCUIT. PROVIDE MULTIPLE CIRCUITS TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS,LOAD CIRCUITS TO A MAXIMUM OF80% CONNECT TO BACK BOXES FORFUTURE ADDRESSABLE MODULES INDWELLING UNITS. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM NOTES: -FIRE ALARM SYSTEM TO BE FULLY ADDRESSABLE WITH VOICE EVACUATION CAPABILITIES. -SMOKE DETECTORS IN DWELLING UNITS TO BE LOCAL AC/DC NON-ADDRESSABLE NOT CONNECTEDTO THE FACP BUT INTERCONNECTED SO IF ONE INITIATES ALL SMOKES IN THE APARTMENT WILLNOTIFY. -PROVIDE BOX FOR FUTURE ADDRESSABLE MODULE IN EACH DWELLING UNIT. ADDRESSABLE MODULE WILL BE INSTALLED IF THE UNIT IS EVER CONVERTED FOR USE BY A HEARING IMPAIRED TENANT.-PROVIDE 18 / 2 WIRES FROM THE SMOKE DETECTORS TO THE IA BOX WITHIN EACH DWELLINGUNIT (NOT CONNECTED TO THE SMOKE DETECTOR). -PROVIDE BUILDING SYSTEM FIRE ALARM WIRING TO IA BOX IN EACH APARTMENT. -SPEAKERS ONLY IN DWELLING UNITS (EVEN THOUGH SYMBOL SHOWS SPEAKER STROBE) WILL SOUND (NOTIFY) IN THE EVENT OF A BUILDING FA DEVICE INITIATION TO MAINTAIN 75 dBA AT "THEPILLOW. 1 N.T.S. BLDGS G-L ELECTRICAL POWER RISER DIAGRAM 3 N.T.S. STRUCTURED CABLING & CATV SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM M M M M M M M M M M GRADE M M M M MMMM M M M M M M TPG1 TPG2 TPK1 TPK2 300 AMPOWNERS METER &MAIN BREAKER NOTE: BRANCH DEVICE METER SETS ARE 3∅ IN 1∅ OUT SO APARTMENT HAVE 1∅ 208 V FEED.BALANCE LOADS BETWEEN 3∅ PHASE LEGS. 14A 300 AMP AUTOMATICTRANSFER SWITCH(ATS) UTILITYTRANSFORMER TPG3 TPM1 TPM2 TPJ1 TPJ2 TPJ3 TPM3 TPM7 TPM8 TPM9 TPJ5 TPJ6 TPG6 TPG7 TPK3 TPK4 22B 300 AMP GENDISCONNECT SWITCH HPH1 14A14A G G-1 7A TYPICAL FOR ALL FEEDS TO TENANT'S PANELS, TP TENANT PANEL (TP)(TYPICAL OF 35) LETTER DESIGNATIONINDICATES UNIT TYPE MAIN INCOMING SWITCH (CIRCUITBREAKER. 1000 AMP,208Y/120V/3PH/4W M M M M MM M M M M MM TPH1 TPH2 TPG4 TPG5 TPG8 TPG9 TPJ4 TPJ7 TPE3 TPM4 TPM10 TPL1 TPM6TPM5 TPM11 BRANCH DEVICE METER SOCKET. RINGLESS WITH LEVER BYPASS AND 100 AMP CB MODEL EZMH316 TYPICAL OF 8. BRANCH DEVICE TO BE SELECTED TO STAY WITHIN EVERSOURCE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. AS SUCH THEY WILL LIKELY TO BE IN STACKS THAT ARE 4 OR 5 METERS HIGH. CONTRACTOR TO LAYOUT METER SETS INMETER/ELECTRICAL ROOM ACCORDINGLY.PROVIDE TAP BOXES NECESSARY TO EXTENDMETER SETS BEYOND ONE WALL. PACKAGED NATURAL GAS GENERATOR SET, G-1 BASIS OF DESIGN: GENERAC SG100 (100kW, 208Y/120V/3PH/4W) AT EXTERIOR W/LEVEL 1 ACOUSTICAL ENCLOSURE 120V HOTLEGS. METER SETS SECONDARY FEEDER INCOMING UTILITY ELECTRICAL POWER SERVICE H BUILDING G BUILDING K BUILDING M BUILDING J BUILDING L BUILDING MAIN BUILDING STRUCTURED MEDIA ENCLOSURE ON 1_2" THICKPAINTED PLYWOOD BACKBOARDAND BUILDING DEMARC SIZE FORREQUIRED EQUIPMENT AND CABLING. TWO 4" CONDUITSWITH PULL STRING TV CABLE (RG59 OR RG11) WITH APARTMENT# TAG (TYP FOR ALL 80 APARTMENTS CAT 6 CABLE WITH APARTMENT #TAG (TYP FOR ALL 80 APARTMENTS) APARTMENT CATV RECEPTACLE (TYP)SEE PLANS FOR QUANTITIES ANDLOCATIONS. VOICE OUTLET RJ11 OR RJ45 AS DIRECTED BY OWNER (TYP) SEE PLANS FOR QUANTITIES AND LOCATIONS. DATA OUTLET RJ45 (TYP) SEE PLANS FOR QUANTITIES AND LOCATIONS. COAX CABLE CAT 6 CABLE APARTMENT COMPACTSTRUCTURED MEDIAENCLOSURE LEVITONCAT#47605 OR EQUALPROVIDE 120 V OUTLET NEARBY.CAT 6 & COAX CABLE TO OTHER APARTMENTS OR DROPS IN OTHER AREAS.POLE ORUNDERGROUNDSERVICE LOCATION CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN AND SIZE BUILDING STRUCTURED CABLING SYSTEM. VOICE, DATA (CAT 6 INTERNET CONNECTION) AND CABLE TV SHALLBE PROVIDED TO EACH APARTMENT AND THE COMMON AND OFFICE AREAS. DROPS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. INCLUDE ALLOCATION FORFUTURE TENANT DATA, VOICE AND CATV REQUIREMENTS. TYPICAL APARTMENT CONFIGURATION Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" E2.1 POWER RISERDIAGRAM Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 2 2 2 2 2 2 No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 F TS IA IA FSSS S/CO IAS EOL 1 N.T.S. BLDGS A-F ELECTRICAL POWER RISER DIAGRAM 2 N.T.S. FIRE ALARM PANEL DETAIL 3 N.T.S. STRUCTURED CABLING & CATV SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM M M M M M M M M M M GRADE M M M M MMMM M M M M M M TPA1 TPA2 TPB1 TPB2 300 AMPOWNERS METER &MAIN BREAKER BRANCH DEVICE METER SOCKET. RINGLESS WITH LEVER BYPASS AND 100 AMP CB MODEL EZMH316 TYPICAL OF 8. BRANCH DEVICE TO BE SELECTED TO STAY WITHIN EVERSOURCE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. AS SUCH THEY WILL LIKELY TO BE IN STACKSTHAT ARE 4 OR 5 METERS HIGH.CONTRACTOR TO LAYOUT METER SETS INMETER/ELECTRICAL ROOM ACCORDINGLY.PROVIDE TAP BOXES NECESSARY TO EXTENDMETER SETS BEYOND ONE WALL. NOTE: BRANCH DEVICE METER SETS ARE 3∅ IN 1∅ OUT SO APARTMENT HAVE 1∅ 208 V FEED.BALANCE LOADS BETWEEN 3∅ PHASE LEGS. 16B 300 AMP AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH (ATS) UTILITYTRANSFORMER TPA3 TPA4 TPA5 TPB8 TPB9 TPB10 TPA6 TPB14 TPB15 TPB16 TPB12 TPD3 TPD4 TPB5 TPB6 TPB7 TPC3 TPC4 23B 300 AMP GENDISCONNECT SWITCH HPB 14B14B HPF G G-2 PACKAGED NATURAL GAS GENERATOR SET, G-2 BASIS OF DESIGN: GENERAC SG130 (130kW, 208Y/120V/3PH/4W) AT EXTERIOR W/LEVEL 1 ACOUSTICAL ENCLOSURE 7A TYPICAL FOR ALL FEEDS TO TENANT'S PANELS, TP TENANT PANEL (TP)(TYPICAL OF 38) LETTER DESIGNATIONINDICATES UNIT TYPE MAIN INCOMING SWITCH (CIRCUIT BREAKER. 1200 AMP, 208Y/120V/3PH/4W M M M M MM M M M M MM M M TPC1 TPC2 TPB3 TPB4 TPD1 TPD2 TPB11 TPE2 TPE3 TPB13 TPB17 TPB21 TPB22TPB20TPB19TPB18 HPE 12B 7A HPB1 12B FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL WITH VOICE EVAC (FACP) BASEMENT 120V HOT LEGS. METER SETS SECONDARY FEEDER INCOMING UTILITY ELECTRICAL POWER SERVICE LEVEL SB LEVLEL ONE LEVEL B LEVEL THREE LEVEL TWO LEVEL FOUR ROOF 3/4" RACEWAY AND WIRINGTO TELEPHONE SERVICE.TO CONNECT TO FD * 20A- IPPOWER CONNECTION INITIATION CIRCUITS TYPICAL INITIATION DEVICES MANUAL PULL STATIONS SMOKE AND CO DETECTORS. REFER TOPLANS FOR QUANTITIES ANDLOCATION TYPICAL NOTIFICATION DEVICESSPEAKER STROBES, SPEAKERS,AND STROBES. REFER TO PLANSFOR QUANTITY AND LOCATION TYPICAL ENDOF THE LINERESISTOR TYPICAL AUDIO/VISUAL CIRCUIT. PROVIDE MULTIPLE CIRCUITS TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS, LOAD CIRCUITS TO A MAXIMUM OF 80% CONNECT TO BACK BOXES FORFUTURE ADDRESSABLE MODULES INDWELLING UNITS. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM NOTES: -FIRE ALARM SYSTEM TO BE FULLY ADDRESSABLE WITH VOICE EVACUATION CAPABILITIES. -SMOKE DETECTORS IN DWELLING UNITS TO BE LOCAL AC/DC NON-ADDRESSABLE NOT CONNECTEDTO THE FACP BUT INTERCONNECTED SO IF ONE INITIATES ALL SMOKES IN THE APARTMENT WILLNOTIFY. -PROVIDE BOX FOR FUTURE ADDRESSABLE MODULE IN EACH DWELLING UNIT. ADDRESSABLE MODULE WILL BE INSTALLED IF THE UNIT IS EVER CONVERTED FOR USE BY A HEARING IMPAIRED TENANT. -PROVIDE 18 / 2 WIRES FROM THE SMOKE DETECTORS TO THE IA BOX WITHIN EACH DWELLINGUNIT (NOT CONNECTED TO THE SMOKE DETECTOR).-PROVIDE BUILDING SYSTEM FIRE ALARM WIRING TO IA BOX IN EACH APARTMENT. -SPEAKERS ONLY IN DWELLING UNITS (EVEN THOUGH SYMBOL SHOWS SPEAKER STROBE) WILL SOUND (NOTIFY) IN THE EVENT OF A BUILDING FA DEVICE INITIATION TO MAINTAIN 75 dBA AT "THEPILLOW. MAIN BUILDING STRUCTURED MEDIAENCLOSURE ON 1_2" THICK PAINTED PLYWOOD BACKBOARD AND BUILDING DEMARC SIZE FOR REQUIRED EQUIPMENT AND CABLING. TWO 4" CONDUITS WITH PULL STRING TV CABLE (RG59 OR RG11) WITH APARTMENT # TAG (TYP FOR ALL 80 APARTMENTS CAT 6 CABLE WITH APARTMENT #TAG (TYP FOR ALL 80 APARTMENTS) APARTMENT CATV RECEPTACLE (TYP) SEE PLANS FOR QUANTITIES AND LOCATIONS. VOICE OUTLET RJ11 OR RJ45 ASDIRECTED BY OWNER (TYP) SEEPLANS FOR QUANTITIES ANDLOCATIONS. DATA OUTLET RJ45(TYP) SEE PLANS FORQUANTITIES ANDLOCATIONS. COAX CABLE CAT 6 CABLE APARTMENT COMPACT STRUCTURED MEDIA ENCLOSURE LEVITON CAT#47605 OR EQUALPROVIDE 120 V OUTLET NEARBY.CAT 6 & COAXCABLE TO OTHERAPARTMENTS ORDROPS IN OTHERAREAS.POLE ORUNDERGROUNDSERVICE LOCATION CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN AND SIZE BUILDING STRUCTURED CABLING SYSTEM. VOICE, DATA (CAT 6 INTERNET CONNECTION) AND CABLE TV SHALL BE PROVIDED TO EACH APARTMENT AND THE COMMON AND OFFICE AREAS. DROPS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. INCLUDE ALLOCATION FOR FUTURE TENANT DATA, VOICE AND CATV REQUIREMENTS. TYPICAL APARTMENT CONFIGURATION Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" E2.2 POWER RISERDIAGRAM Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS Checker Author 11/01/2016 16066.01 2 2 2 2 2 No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, E3.2 ELECTRICALPANELBOARDSCHEDULES Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS Checker Author 11/01/2016 16066.01 Notes: Total Est. Demand:59 A Receptacle 540 VA 55.00%297 VA Total Conn.:59 A Other 5580 VA 100.00%5580 VA Total Est. Demand:12254 VA Motor 3274 VA 108.08%3539 VA Total Conn. Load:12233 VA Lighting - Dwelling Unit 1920 VA 100.00%1920 VA Load Classification Connected Load Demand Factor Estimated Demand Panel Totals Legend: Total Amps:57 A 60 A Total Load:5960 VA 6274 VA 41 42 39 40 37 38 35 36 33 Other 20 A 1 720 VA 529 VA ------34 31 529 VA 2 20 A Motor 32 29 Motor 20 A 1 50 VA 500 VA 1 20 A Power 30 27 Motor 20 A 1 550 VA 529 VA ------28 25 Security Head End Rack 20 A 1 360 VA 529 VA 2 20 A Motor 26 23 Lighting - Dwelling Unit 20 A 1 192 VA 180 VA 1 20 A Security Head End Rack 24 21 Lighting 20 A 1 192 VA 512 VA 1 20 A Lighting 22 19 ------529 VA 800 VA 1 20 A Lighting 20 17 SEWAGE EJECTOR PUMP 20 A 2 529 VA 540 VA 1 20 A Other 18 15 Lighting 20 A 1 224 VA 1080 VA 1 20 A CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 16 13 Spare 20 A 1 0 VA 540 VA 1 20 A CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 14 11 CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 20 A 1 360 VA 900 VA 1 20 A CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 12 9 WASHER 20 A 1 180 VA 360 VA 1 20 A CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 10 7 ------90 VA 180 VA 1 20 A WASHER 8 5 DRYER 20 A 2 90 VA 180 VA 1 20 A WASHER 6 3 ------90 VA 90 VA ------4 1 DRYER 20 A 2 90 VA 90 VA 2 20 A DRYER 2 CKT Circuit Description Trip Poles A B Poles Trip Circuit Description CKT Notes: Enclosure:MCB Rating:100 AMounting:Recessed Wires:3 Mains Rating:100 A Supply From:HPB Phases:1 Mains Type: Location:Volts:120/208 single A.I.C. Rating: Branch Panel:HPH1 Notes: Total Est. Demand:306 A Receptacle 1260 VA 40.00%504 VA Total Conn.:299 A Other 16380 VA 100.00%16380 VA Total Est. Demand:110392 VA Motor 78249 VA 104.31%81624 VA Total Conn. Load:107848 VA Lighting - Dwelling Unit 3121 VA 97.48%3042 VA Load Classification Connected Load Demand Factor Estimated Demand Panel Totals Legend: Total Amps:325 A 335 A 257 A Total Load:37901 VA 39155 VA 30792 VA 41 42 39 40 37 38 35 36 33 34 31 32 29 30 27 28 25 26 23 24 21 ------1850...500 VA 1 20 A Power 22 19 Power 20 A 2 1850...1000...1 20 A Power 20 17 ------987 VA 1000...1 20 A Power 18 15 ------987 VA 3300...------16 13 Motor 20 A 3 987 VA 3300...------14 11 ------1857...3300...3 80 A ELEVATOR 1 12 9 ------1875...6274...------10 7 HPFA 225 A 3 1931...5960...2 100 A HPH1 8 5 ------4109...2818...------6 3 ------3279...4218...2 100 A HPE 4 1 HPB1A 225 A 3 5319...180 VA 1 20 A Security Head End Rack 2 CKT Circuit Description Trip Poles A B C Poles Trip Circuit Description CKT Notes: Enclosure:Type 1 MCB Rating:400 A Mounting:Surface Wires:4 Mains Rating:400 A Supply From:Phases:3 Mains Type: Location:Volts:120/208 Wye A.I.C. Rating: Branch Panel:HPB Notes: Total Est. Demand:37 A Receptacle 720 VA 50.00%360 VA Total Conn.:35 A Other 5400 VA 100.00%5400 VA Total Est. Demand:13230 VA Motor 4791 VA 118.44%5674 VA Total Conn. Load:12707 VA Lighting - Dwelling Unit 1184 VA 100.00%1184 VA Load Classification Connected Load Demand Factor Estimated Demand Panel Totals Legend: Total Amps:45 A 27 A 35 A Total Load:5319 VA 3279 VA 4109 VA 41 42 39 40 37 38 35 36 33 Other 20 A 1 540 VA 50 VA 1 20 A Motor 34 31 Power 20 A 1 550 VA 1767...------32 29 ERV2 20 A 1 50 VA 1767...2 30 A HP-4 30 27 Lighting 20 A 1 160 VA 352 VA 1 20 A Lighting 28 25 Lighting 20 A 1 213 VA 288 VA 1 20 A Lighting 26 23 ------529 VA 331 VA 1 20 A Lighting 24 21 Motor 20 A 2 529 VA 50 VA 1 20 A Motor 22 19 LEVLEL 3 CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 20 A 1 540 VA 360 VA 1 20 A LEVEL 4 CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 20 17 LEVEL 1 CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 20 A 1 540 VA 360 VA 1 20 A LEVEL 2 CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 18 15 ------90 VA 90 VA ------16 13 DRYER 50 A 2 90 VA 90 VA 2 50 A DRYER 14 11 ------90 VA 90 VA ------12 9 DRYER 50 A 2 90 VA 90 VA 2 50 A DRYER 10 7 WASHER 20 A 1 180 VA 180 VA 1 20 A WASHSER 8 5 WASHER 20 A 1 180 VA 180 VA 1 20 A WASHER 6 3 MAINTENANCE RECEPTACLES 20 A 1 720 VA 540 VA 1 20 A B CORRIDOR RECEPTACLES 4 1 BOILER ROOM RECEPTACLE 20 A 1 540 VA 540 VA 1 20 A SB RECEPTACLES 2 CKT Circuit Description Trip Poles A B C Poles Trip Circuit Description CKT Notes: Enclosure:Type 1 MCB Rating:225 A Mounting:Surface Wires:4 Mains Rating:225 A Supply From:HPB Phases:3 Mains Type: Location:Volts:120/208 Wye A.I.C. Rating: Branch Panel:HPB1 Notes: Total Est. Demand:167 A Total Conn.:157 A Total Est. Demand:60023 VA Other 1440 VA 100.00%1440 VA Total Conn. Load:56648 VA Motor 55208 VA 106.11%58583 VA Load Classification Connected Load Demand Factor Estimated Demand Panel Totals Legend: Total Amps:161 A 157 A 155 A Total Load:19310 VA 18759 VA 18579 VA 41 42 39 40 37 38 35 1590...------36 33 Security Head End Rack 20 A 1 180 VA 1590...------34 31 BLDG F LIGHTING 20 A 1 0 VA 1590...3 40 A ELEVATOR 2 32 29 ------529 VA 987 VA ------30 27 Motor 20 A 2 529 VA 987 VA ------28 25 KITCHENETTE RECEPTACLES 20 A 1 0 VA 987 VA 3 20 A CT-1 26 23 FRIDGE 20 A 1 0 VA 0 VA 1 20 A KITCHENETTE RECEPTACLES 24 21 Other 20 A 1 0 VA 0 VA 1 20 A TOILET ROOM CIRCUIT 22 19 BOILER ROOM RECEPTACLES 20 A 1 720 VA 540 VA 1 20 A Other 20 17 ------2250...2250...------18 15 ------2250...2250...------16 13 P5 50 A 3 2250...2250...3 50 A P6 14 11 ------987 VA 987 VA ------12 9 ------987 VA 987 VA ------10 7 P3 20 A 3 987 VA 987 VA 3 20 A P4 8 5 ------4500...4500...------6 3 ------4500...4500...------4 1 P1 (VFD)80 A 3 4500...4500...3 80 A P2 (VFD)2 CKT Circuit Description Trip Poles A B C Poles Trip Circuit Description CKT Notes: Enclosure:Type 1 MCB Rating:225 AMounting:Surface Wires:4 Mains Rating:100 A Supply From:HPB Phases:3 Mains Type: Location:BOILER ROOM C-13 Volts:120/208 Wye A.I.C. Rating: Branch Panel:HPF 2 No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 GFIGFI GFI GFI GFI GFIGFIGFIFFF F FFFFS S COMMUNITY ROOM(OPEN ABOVE) KITCHENETTE JAN TOILET FITNESS ROOM(OPEN ABOVE) TOILET HPF - 20 HPF - 22 HPF - 23 HPF - 24 HPF - 25 HPF - 21 HPF - 32,34,36 ELEVATOR 2 2 BOILER ROOM FITNESS ROOMBELOW COMMUNITY BELOW TOILETSBELOW 2' - 3" P6 P5 B1 B2 P1 P2 HPF - 1,3,5 HPF - 2,4,6 VFD VFD HPF - 7,9,11 HPF - 8,10,12 P3 P4 HPF - 14,16,18 HPF - 13,15,17 HPF - 19 HPF HP HPF - 27,29 H4 HPF - 33 SECURITY HEAD END RACK S/CO 2 2 HPF - 27,29 HPF - 26,28,30 CT-1 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" F-EP1.1 ELECTRICALPOWER PLANSBLDG F - LEVELS 1 AND 2 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 S S GFI F F GFIGFI GFIJ GFI J GFIGFIJ GFI GFI GFIGFIJ GFI GFIGFI GFI GFI GFIGFI GFIGFI J J GFIGFI JGFIGFI GFIJ J S S GFI GFIGFIGFI GFI GFIGFIGFIGFIGFIJ GFIFFFF FF GFI GFI GFI GFIGFI S S S S S S S S S S S FFMM TV TV TV TVTV TV TV TV TV MM TV TV M TV MTVTV TV TV MMMMMMTV TV TVMTV TV TV TV TV MM M M TV J M TV BUILDING K BUILDING H BUILDING G TPG6 2 2 14 2 1 TPG6 - 3 4 TPG6 - 4 5 5 TPG6 - 5 TPG6 - 6,8 TPG6 - 7 TPG6 - 11,13 TPG4 2 2 TPG4 - 3TPG4 - 5 TPG4 - 4 TPG4 - 6,8 TPG4 - 7 TPG4 - 9 TPG4 - 11,13 4 4 55 TPG1 2 2 2 TPG1 - 4 4 4 5 TPG1 - 7 TPG2 2 2 TPG2 - 2 TPG2 - 3 4 4 TPG2 - 4 5 TPG2 - 5 TPG2 - 6,8 TPG2 - 7 TPG2 - 11,13 HP HP HP HP TPG7 2TPG7 - 2 4 5 5 5 TPG7 - 6,8 TPG7 - 7TPG7 - 5 TPG7 - 9 TPG7 - 3 TPG7 - 11,13 TPG8 TPG8 - 3 4 TPG8 - 2 5 TPG8 - 6,8 TPG8 - 7 TPG8 - 9 TPG8 - 11,13 2 TPG4 - 2 TPG3 - 3 TPG3 - 44 5TPG3 - 7 TPG3 - 9 TPG3 - 11,13 TPG9 2 2 2 TPG9 - 3 4 TPG9 - 4 5 TPG9 - 6,8 TPG9 - 7 TPG9 - 9 TPG9 - 11,13 TPG5 TPG5 - 1 TPG5 - 3 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 TPG5 - 5 5TPG5 - 6,8 TPG5 - 9 5 TPG5 - 12 TPG5 - 4 TPG5 - 7 TPG5 - 11,13 TPG5 - 2 HP HP HP HP HP KEF KEF KEF KEF EF-1 EF-1 EF EF EF-1 EF EF KEF 12 12 12 TPG3 - 12 TPG9 - 12 TPG7 - 12 TPG8 - 12 TPG7 - 12 TPG2 - 12 TPG2 - 12 12HPH1 - 18 114 14 141 4UNIT G-5(2 BEDROOM) UNIT G-6(1 BEDROOM) UNIT G-7(1 BEDROOM) UNIT G-8(1 BEDROOM) UNIT G-9(2 BEDROOM) UNIT G-4(1 BEDROOM)UNIT G-3(1 BEDROOM)UNIT G-2(1 BEDROOM) UNIT G-1(2 BEDROOM) LAUNDRYROOM REVISED UNIT G-9(1 BEDROOM)TPG5 - 12 TPG6 - 2 1 1TPG6 - 1 TPG3 1 1 1 TPG4 - 1 22 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 5 4 4 TPG9 - 1 1 1 1 TPG9 - 2 5 TPG9 - 5 5 TPG8 - 5 1 1 1 TPG7 - 1 22 4 4 TPG9 - 12 EF-1EF EF-1EF HP 2 1 1 1 TPG2 - 1 TPG1 - 11,13 1 1 1 TPG1 - 1 2 2 2 2 14 14 14 TPG1 - 14 TPG1 - 3 5 TPG1 - 6,8 TPG1 - 9 S/COS/COS/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO S/CO HPH1 - 18 HPH1 - 18 2 2 24 45 1 1 1 12 TPH1 - 1 TPH1 - 7 TPH1 - 4 TPH1 - 5 TPH1 - 6,8 TPH1 - 9 TPH1 - 2 TPH1 - 3 TPH1 - 13,15 14 14 14 TPH2 - 14 TPH2 - 2 14 14 TPK2 - 14 14 2 2 2 TPK2 - 2 2 2 4 4 TPK2 - 5 5 TPK2 - 6,8 5 TPK2 - 9 TPK4 - 3 1 1 1 TPK4 - 1 2 TPK4 - 4 TPK4 - 9 2 TPK2 - 11,13 TPK2 - 12 TPK2 TPK4 TPH1 TPH1 S/CO S/CO S/CO HPH1 - 1,3 HPH1 - 2,4 HPH1 - 5,7 HPH1 - 6 HPH1 - 8 HPH1 - 9 TPG4 - 12 EF-1 1 1A * 1A * TPG6 - 9 1A * 1 1A * 1 2 2 2 4 TPG3 - 6,8 2 TPG2 - 9 1A * 4 1 1A * 1A *1A * EF-1 EF-1 TPG9 - 12 EF-1 TPH1 - 12 EF-1 1A * 1A * 1A * 1A * TPG1 - 12 TPK2 - 11,13HP EF-1 TPK2 - 12 TPG2 - 12 HPH1 - 26,28 HPH1 - 32,34 HPH1 - 33 HPH1 - 27 HPH1 - 29 P-1 P-2 B-1 1A * BACK BOX AND FOR FUTURE FA ADDRESSABLEMODULE IF APARTMENT IS COVERTED FORHEARING IMPAIRED TENANTS 22 S/CO 2 22 2 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" GH-EP1.1 ELECTRICALPOWER PLANBLDG 'G' AND 'H' Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 J S GFISS GFIJ J J FF GFI JGFI GFIJ GFIS S S GFIJ J S S S S GFIJ GFIS S S S SS S S GFI TV TV TVTVTV TV TV TVTV MMTVTV TV TV MMMMMMMM TVMMTVTV TV TV TV TV TV TVTV MMM MMMJ UNIT H-2(2 BEDROOM) METERROOM HPH1 HPH1 - 9 HPH1 - 10 TPH2 TPH2 - 1 TPH2 - 2 TPH2 - 3 TPH2 - 4 TPH2 - 5 TPH2 - 6,8 TPH2 - 9 TPH2 - 7 TPH2 - 3,10 TPH2 - 3,10 TPH2 - 11,13 HP1 AUTOMATICTRANSFERSWITCH(ATS2) GENERATOR DS(GDS2) SECONDARYFEEDS FROM UTILITYTRANSFORMER 21B MAIN DEVICE W/MCB SQUARE DEZM 3800 CBU 800 AMP, 208V/120V/3D/4W TENANT METERS IN SQUARE DEZ METER -PAK3D IN-1D OUT EZM316125,1000 AMP, 208V/120V HP1 TPJ7 TPJ7 - 1 TPJ7 - 2 TPJ7 - 11,13 TPJ7 - 3 TPJ7 - 5 TPJ7 - 6,8 TPJ7 - 4 TPJ3 TPJ3 - 1 1 1 1TPJ3 - 2 22 2 TPJ3 - 3 4 4 TPJ3 - 4 5 5 TPJ3 - 6,8TPJ3 - 9 TPJ3 - 7 TPJ3 - 11,13 HP1 14 14 14 14 TPJ3 - 14 TPJ7 - 7 TPJ4 1 1 1 TPJ4 - 3 TPJ4 - 11,13 HP1 TPJ4 - 1 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 TPJ4 - 5 TPJ4 - 6,8 TPJ4 - 7 TPJ4 - 4 TPJ4 - 2 75 TPJ5 TPJ5 - 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 TPJ5 - 3 TPJ5 - 2 TPJ5 - 4 5 5 5 9 TPJ5 - 7 TPJ5 - 9 14 14 14 TPJ5 - 15 TPJ6 11 1 TPJ6 - 1 2 2 2 2 2 4 TPJ6 - 3 4 4 5 5 TPJ6 - 6,8 TPJ6 - 7 14 14 14 TPJ6 - 14 TPJ6 - 15 2 14 1 11 TPH2 - 1 2 2 2 2 2 TPH2 - 3 TPH2 - 2 4 5 5 5 TPH2 - 6,8 TPH2 - 7 TPH2 - 4 TPH2 - 9 TPH2 - 11,13 TPH2 - 14 14 14 14 14 TPH2 - 5 TPJ1 1 1 1 1 TPJ1 - 1 TPJ1 - 2 2 2 2 2 TPJ1 - 3 4 TPJ1 - 4 55 5 TPJ1 - 6,8 TPJ1 - 7 TPJ1 - 5 TPJ1 - 9 10 TPJ1 - 11,13 TPJ1 - 12 14 14 14 TPJ1 - 14 1 1 1 1 1 TPJ2 - 1 2 2 2 2 TPJ2 - 2 TPJ2 TPJ2 - 3 4 TPJ2 - 5 5 5 TPJ2 - 4 TPJ2 - 6,8 TPJ2 - 7 TPJ2 - 9 TPJ2 - 11,13 TPJ1 - 12 2 TPJ5 - 14 14 14 HPH1 - 14 10 TPJ6 - 11,13 TPH1 - 2 2 TPH1 - 12 HPH1 - 17,19 SEWAGE EJECTOR PUMP HPH1 - 24 H5 SECURITY SYSTEMHEAD END RACK 1A * TPJ4 - 12 5 TPJ4 - 9 TPJ5 - 6,8 TPJ5 - 16,18 1A * S/CO 1A * HP1 EF-1 TPJ5 - 17 EF-1 TPJ5 - 5 TPJ5 - 19EF-1 TPJ6 - 12 EF-1 TPJ6 - 16 EF-1 HP-1 TPJ6 - 9 TPJ6 - 17 TPJ6 - 5 EF-1 EF-1 TPJ3 - 15EF-1 TPJ3 - 16 S/CO 5 5 5 4 2 2 2 2 TPJ7 - 9 S/CO S/CO 11 1 1A * 1A * HP-1 HP-1 EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 TPJ7 - 12 1 1 1 1 EF-1 HP1 TPH2 - 15 EF-1 TPH2 TPH2 - 16 1515 15 15 DENOTES CIRCUIT IN ASSOCIATED APARTMENT TENANT PANEL TP S/CO S/CO EF-1 FIRE ALARMCONTROLPANEL (FACP) STRUCTURED MEDIAENCLOSURE (DEMARK) 2 2 2 HPH1 - 30 EWH-13 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" J-EP1.1 ELECTRICALPOWER PLANBLDG J - LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19 S S S J GFIJFFGFI SS S S J GFIGFIJ GFIGFI GFI GFI GFIGFIGFIGFI GFIGFI GFIGFI GFI GFI GFI GFI J J J GFIGFI GFIGFIGFI GFIGFI GFI GFI GFIGFI GFIJ GFIGFIGFIGFI GFI GFI GFIGFI J J J GFIGFIGFIGFI GFI GFI GFIGFIGFIGFI GFIGFIGFI GFI S S F F S S S S S S S S S S S S TV TV TV MMTV TVTV MMMTV TV MMMTV TVTV MM TV TV TV TV TV TV TV TV MTV TV TV TV TV M MM MM MTV TV TV TV M MMM MTVTV MSGFI TPM9 TPM9 - 1 HP1 EF-1 TPM9 - 7 TPM9 - 5 TPM9 - 2 TPM9 - 14 TPM9 - 6,8 TPM9 - 9 TPM9 - 4 TPM9 - 11,13TPM9 - 3 TPM9 - 12 TPM1 TPM1 - 2 TPM1 - 1 TPM1 - 4 TPM1 - 5 TPM1 - 6,8 TPM1 - 7 TPM1 - 9 TPM1 - 11,13 EF-1 HP1 HP1 TPM11 11 1 2 22 TPM11 - 2 TPM11 - 1 TPM11 - 3 4 4 4 55 TPM11 - 6,8 TPM11 - 4 TPM11 - 5 TPM11 - 7 TPM11 - 9 TPM11 - 11,13 TPM11 - 14 14 14 14 TPM10 EF-1 11 1 TPM10 - 1 2 22 2 TPM10 - 2 TPM10 - 3 4 4 5 55 TPM10 - 4 TPM10 - 6,8 TPM10 - 7 4 TPM10 - 9 HP1 TPM10 - 11,13 TPM10 - 12 14 14 14 TPM10 - 14 1 1 1 1 3 22 2 2 2 TPM594 5 5 5 4 TPM5 - 11,13 TPM5 - 12 14 14 14 14 14 TPM4 1 1 12 22 2 3 4 4 455 9 14 1414 TPM4 - 11,13 TPM4 - 6,8 TPM4 - 12 TPM4 - 1 TPM3 - 12 TPM3 - 5 TPM3 - 2 TPM3 - 7 TPM3 - 6,8 TPM3 - 9 TPM3 - 111 1 222 2TPM3 TPM3 - 4 4 4 5 TPM3 - 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 5 4 4 1 TPM2 TPM2 - 12 TPM2 - 5 TPM2 - 4 TPM2 - 7TPM2 - 11,13 TPM2 - 1 TPM2 - 2 TPM8 TPM7 TPM6 2 1 22 2 1 1 5 5 4 4 2 TPM8 - 5 TPM8 - 1 TPM8 - 14 TPM8 - 12 TPM8 - 11,13 TPM8 - 6,8 TPM8 - 7 TPM8 - 4 TPM8 - 3 TPM8 - 9 14 14 14 TPM7 - 6,8 TPM7 - 5 TPM7 - 4 TPM7 - 3 TPM7 - 11,13 TPM7 - 2 TPM7 - 14 2 2 22 1414 14 14 1 1 1 5 5 4 4 TPM6 - 1 TPM6 - 14 TPM6 - 2 TPM6 - 3 TPM6 - 12 TPM6 - 4 TPM6 - 5 TPM6 - 11,13 TPM6 - 7 TPM6 - 6,81 1 1 2 2 14 14 14 2 2 5 5 4 4 TPM1 - 12 TPM2 - 3 16 16 16 16 16 HPH1 - 16 UNIT M-11(2 BEDROOM) UNIT M-10(2 BEDROOM)UNIT M-9(2 BEDROOM) UNIT M-8(2 BEDROOM)UNIT M-7(2 BEDROOM) UNIT M-6(2 BEDROOM) UNIT M-1(1 BEDRROM) UNIT M-2(2 BEDROOM) UNIT M-3(2 BEDROOM) UNIT M-4(2 BEDROOM) UNIT M-5(2 BEDROOM) HPH1 - 25 H6 SECURITY HEADEND RACK S/CO 1A * EF-1 EF-1 TPM11 - 12 1A * TPM10 - 12 1A * 1A * S/CO EF-1 EF-1 TPM5 - 6,8 EF-1 HP-1 TPM5 - 15 TPM5 - 7 1A * TPM4 - 14 TPM4 - 5 TPM4 - 2 TPM4 - 15 TPM4 - 7 TPM5 - 2 TPM5 - 14 EF-1 EF-1 TPM4 - 12 HP1 14 14 S/CO1A *1A * 1A * 1A * 1A *1A * 1A * S/CO 1 1 1 1S/CO S/CO EF-1 TPM7 - 12 TPM7 - 9 TPM7 - 12 EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 EF-1 14 14 14 14 TPM2 - 14 14 14 14 14 TPM3 - 14 S/CO HP1 EF-1 EF-1 TPM2 - 9 TPM1 - 3 TPM1 - 12 S/CO S/CO EF-1 EF-1 HP-1 1A * TPM3 - 11,13 EF-1 DENOTES CIRCUIT # INASSOCIATED TENANTPANEL-TP (TYP) TPM7 - 1 S/CO S/CO DENOTES CIRCUIT # INPANEL HPH1 FORCORRIDOR RECEPTACLES(TYP) TPM5 - 1 TS FS 2 2 HPL 1 1 HPL - 1 HPL - 2 2 2 2 HPL - 4 HPL - 5,7 HPL - 3 FC 1 CU-1 HPL - 8,10 HPL - 9 H7 SECURITY HEAD ENDRACK BUILDING L DENOTES CIRCUIT # INPANEL HPL (TYP) Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number UNCASVILLE, 1/8" = 1'-0" LM-EP1.1 ELECTRICALPOWER PLANBLDG L AND M LEVEL 1 Dakota Partners, Inc. OXOBOXO LOFTS DA RS 11/01/2016 16066.01 A B D E C F G H J K L M NORTH SITE KEY PLAN No.Description Date 1 Final ConstructionDocs 10/12/2018 2 Addendum 2 02/25/19